[Bug 1120865] Review Request: golang-github-BurntSushi-toml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120865 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(walt...@redhat.co | |m) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1137018] Review Request: labelleaurore-fonts -La Belle Aurore fonts by Kimberly Geswein
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1137018 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Looks good. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1137021] Review Request: monofett-fonts - Monofett font released by Vernon Adams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1137021 Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |monofett-fonts - Monofett |monofett-fonts - Monofett |fonts released by Vernon|font released by Vernon |Adams |Adams Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com --- Looks good now. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818602] Review Request: gfalFS - Filesystem client based on GFAL 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818602 Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alejandro.alvarez.ayllon@ce ||rn.ch Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Alejandro Alvarez alejandro.alvarez.ayl...@cern.ch --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gfalFS New Branches: epel7 Owners: adev aalvarez -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 --- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- My reading of the code is that MIME::Base64 will be required if the user input contains more than 50 bytes AND is not UTF8. eg. MIME::Base64 will be required for the following; my $str = ''; $str .= chr ( rand ( 255) ) foreach ( 1 .. 100 ); dd($str); This will include things like inlined images, etc. I think it's worth including. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129220] Review Request: bash-argsparse - An high level argument parsing library for bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129220 --- Comment #7 from Dams an...@livna.org --- Please consider this updated spec file srpm : * https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Anvil/bash-argsparse/8694d1fa89dd74e80cab0342761e581710704319/bash-argsparse.spec * SRPM : (sha256) bc9d0e931419150db7fbeabbf85a974b0091ab7d18d3cec3e45fe8c72d4c2b2a http://argsparse.livna.org/bash-argsparse-1.6-2.fc20.src.rpm It only brings the changelog date fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 --- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- It is preferred for long input but not necessary. Anyhow, updating. Adding MIME::Base64 and chagning Data::Dump::Filtered and Data::Dump::FilterContext to runtime deps; this was actually a typo. The test suite only checks if the module loads. SPEC: https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/perl-Data-Dump-Color/perl-Data-Dump-Color.spec SRPM: https://psabata.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/perl-Data-Dump-Color/perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.21-2.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115702] Review Request: nodejs-postcss - Framework for CSS postprocessors with full source map support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115702 --- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu --- Well you can probably get away without gulp, and just run transpiler directly in the spec but I don't see any way to avoid transpiler if we're genuinely going to package from source. You could always ask on the fedora nodejs list and see if people have any suggestions? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140136] Review Request: python-tooz - Coordination library for distributed systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140136 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- Ok. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135430] Review Request: python-XStatic-jquery-ui - jquery-ui (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135430
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
As with the other XStatic packages, please request upstream to add the license
file.
Since this package complies with Fedora packaging guidelines, I hereby approve
it into Fedora Packages Collection. Please submit a SCM request.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated. 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/haikel/1135430-python-XStatic-jquery-
ui/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[Bug 1074515] Review Request: passenger - Passenger Ruby web application server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074515 --- Comment #20 from Jan Kaluža jkal...@redhat.com --- Updated to latest passenger version: Spec URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/passenger.spec SRPM URL: http://jkaluza.fedorapeople.org/passenger-4.0.50-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141711] New: Review Request: fusionforge - collaborative development tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711 Bug ID: 1141711 Summary: Review Request: fusionforge - collaborative development tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: b...@beuc.net QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge.spec SRPM URL: http://fusionforge.fusionforge.org/fedora/fusionforge-5.3.50+201409151132-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Hi, FusionForge is a extensive collaborative environment for development, used at e.g. https://alioth.debian.org/ , http://pgfoundry.org/ or http://gforge.inria.fr/ . The official .spec description is: FusionForge provides many tools to aid collaboration in a development project, such as bug-tracking, task management, mailing-lists, SCM repository, forums, support request helper, web/FTP hosting, release management, etc. All these services are integrated into one web site and managed through a web interface. The project has historically provided custom RPMs, but after a massive rewrite of the build system during last month, we now have a decent .spec file and hence we wish to submit and maintain it officially at Fedora :) The packaging is split on multiple packages to ease selecting which feature the user wants to install with its dependencies (Git, SVN, MediaWiki, Mailman...), and also allow split installation on multiple servers (e.g. one for the web front-end, one for the SCM repos). I'd also like to know how to proceed for co-maintaining the package: I do have a few packages in Fedora already, but I'd like to give privileges to other packagers who don't - do they need to go through a personal validation process and can I give upload privileges directly? Cheers! Fedora Account System Username: beuc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 --- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Thank you, David. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr --- APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Data-Dump-Color Short Description: Like Data::Dump, but with color Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Data-Dump-Color/ Owners: psabata jplesnik ppisar Branches: f21 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Thanks for the review! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator Short Description: Perl extension for libappindicator Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Gtk2-AppIndicator/ Owners: remi Branches: f19 f20 f21 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179237] Review Request: swaks - A command-line SMTP transaction tester
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179237 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 191473] Review Request: kdiff3: Compare + merge 2 or 3 files or directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191473 --- Comment #48 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 189009] Review Request: bzrtools - A collection of utilities and plugins for Bazaar-NG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=189009 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Dropped bar from the owners list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 590305] Review Request: vile - VI Like Emacs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=590305 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771123] Review Request: fex - Field split/extraction like cut/awk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771123 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771123] Review Request: fex - Field split/extraction like cut/awk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771123 --- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784156] Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 784156] Review Request: uwsgi - Fast, self-healing, application container server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784156 --- Comment #39 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785312] Review Request: e3 - Text editor with key bindings similar to WordStar, Emacs, pico, nedit, or vi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785312 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785312] Review Request: e3 - Text editor with key bindings similar to WordStar, Emacs, pico, nedit, or vi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785312 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818602] Review Request: gfalFS - Filesystem client based on GFAL 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818602 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875359] Review Request: willie - a simple, lightweight, open source, easy-to-use IRC Utility bot, written in Python.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875359 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 818602] Review Request: gfalFS - Filesystem client based on GFAL 2.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=818602 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083344] Review Request: hub - A command-line wrapper for git with github shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083344 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083344] Review Request: hub - A command-line wrapper for git with github shortcuts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083344 --- Comment #14 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089493] Review Request: bashmount - A menu-driven bash script for mounting removable media
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089493 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089493] Review Request: bashmount - A menu-driven bash script for mounting removable media
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089493 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- WARNING: Package does not appear to exist in pkgdb currently. NOTE: Misformatted request; using 'Branches' instead. WARNING: SCM request was not the last comment. WARNING: No new branches requested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138321] Review Request: reeniebeanie-fonts - Reenie Beanie fonts by James Grieshaber
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138321 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138321] Review Request: reeniebeanie-fonts - Reenie Beanie fonts by James Grieshaber
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138321 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138924] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages-Fast - Alternative parser for CPAN's package index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138924 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138924] Review Request: perl-Parse-CPAN-Packages-Fast - Alternative parser for CPAN's package index
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138924 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141389] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Connector - Fast, safe DBI connection and transaction management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141389 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141389] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Connector - Fast, safe DBI connection and transaction management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141389 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #14 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- WARNING: Package does not appear to exist in pkgdb currently. I guess this happened because I forgot to assign the bug to myself when reviewing? Retrying. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|echevemas...@gmail.com |rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #21 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Re: Comment #19 the AUR way isn't the fedora way. Please don't follow that advice here, but rather: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages Looks like the existing reviewer has not responded, so I'll take it from here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Version|20 |rawhide Flags|needinfo?(echevemaster@gmai |fedora-cvs? |l.com) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #15 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- NOTE: Misformatted request; using 'Branches' instead. Not sure what this means: I followed the syntax from https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests Package Change Request == Package Name: dSFMT Short Description: Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister Upstream URL: http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~%20m-mat/MT/SFMT/index.html New Branches: f19 f20 f21 epel7 Owners: laxathom nalimilan InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Initial comments: 1. MUST: fix version/release to match snapshot guidelines referenced in comment #21 2. MUST: Your %changelog is pretty empty. Please update changelog for *every* change made to the packaging, including those here. See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs 3. SHOULD drop extraneous mkdir in %install section, and use install -D flag installing the stuff to %_bindir instead (it'll create the target dir(s) for you). While you're at it, use -p flag too to preserve timestamps. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #23 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- And with item 2, while fixing changelog, please use a valid email address. If you'd rather not use a personal one, then ziro...@fedoraproject.org will suffice too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140136] Review Request: python-tooz - Coordination library for distributed systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140136 --- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- Few things: * python3-oslo-config does not exist yet, I'm fixing it on rawhide * do you plan to maintain an EL6 version, Juno release of RDO will drop EL6 support, so you could remove the EL6 macro definitions at the beginning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1069556] Review Request: zeromq4 - Software library for fast, message-based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1069556
Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||steve.tray...@cern.ch
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|steve.tray...@cern.ch
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros
- There are some rpmlint warnings below
zeromq4-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
zeromq4.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libzmq.so.3.1.0
/lib64/libm.so.6
Maybe it's worth to investigate and at least comment on these.
Comments:
=
As mentinoned above it's a little odd how we are packaging renaming from
zeromq3 - 4 here
despite the fact that there is no .so bump here.
Is another option to update the existing zeromq package to this one and add a
compat
package for runtime.
Indeed I think the decision is yours though.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
We presume that the exceptions were already approved for the existing
zeromq packages.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
LGPL (v3 or later), GPL (v2 or later), Unknown or generated. 4
files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File
[Bug 1140136] Review Request: python-tooz - Coordination library for distributed systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140136 --- Comment #2 from Nejc Saje ns...@redhat.com --- * great, thanks, I missed that one! * removed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1108765] Review Request: dSFMT - Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1108765 --- Comment #16 from Milan Bouchet-Valat nalimi...@club.fr --- I just saw Paulo's mail on fedora-devel. Funny how I checked all fields, but not the header. So here we are: New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dSFMT Upstream URL: http://www.math.sci.hiroshima-u.ac.jp/~%20m-mat/MT/SFMT/index.html Short Description: Double precision SIMD-oriented Fast Mersenne Twister Owners: laxathom nalimilan Branches: f19 f20 f21 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128841] Review Request: openmortal - Parody of the once popular coin-up fighting game, Mortal Kombat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128841 --- Comment #15 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #14) (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #7) (In reply to Michael Schwendt from comment #9) Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openmortal/openmortal.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openmortal/openmortal-0.7-4.fc20.src. rpm Rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7576267 (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #12) (In reply to Stephen Gallagher from comment #13) Stephen, thanks a lot for your explanation of legal issues at the fonts where I do fully confirm. But consider thar upstream is inactive since years. Therefore, it's doubtful that a notice to upstream will decide anything and in the short term. As I said, this *could* be resolved as a packager fix rather than an upstream one: you could remove the questionable fonts from the tarball before uploading it and then patch the source code to use some existing fonts that are packaged (They won't look the same as the upstream release, but I suspect that people are more concerned with the gameplay). Maybe it's the easier way to move this package to RPM Fusion and avoid all that nasty legal discussion? RPM Fusion doesn't protect you from either of these legal issues. If there's a trademark or likeness issue, then RPM Fusion cannot carry it either. As for the fonts, I'm not sure how they would handle that, but you'd likely need to get a legal opinion either way, so scrubbing the fonts from the tarball is likely to be needed regardless. So for the moment, I'd wait to hear a real legal opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141801] New: Review Request: swid_generator - Application which generates SWID-Tags from rpm database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141801 Bug ID: 1141801 Summary: Review Request: swid_generator - Application which generates SWID-Tags from rpm database Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sluka...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/swid_generator/0.3.0-1/swid_generator.spec SRPM URL: https://isimluk.fedorapeople.org/swid_generator/0.3.0-1/swid_generator-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: A small application for Python 3 which generates SWID tags from Linux package managers like dpkg, rpm or pacman. Fedora Account System Username: isimluk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141807] New: Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807 Bug ID: 1141807 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Flags: fedora-review? Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-github-coreos-go-etcd/golang-github-coreos-go-etcd.spec FAS username: jchaloup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141807] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #24 from Martín Buenahora martinbuenah...@openmailbox.org --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #22) Initial comments: 1. MUST: fix version/release to match snapshot guidelines referenced in comment #21 As the upstream does occasionally releases, I prefer using that method, rather that commit versioning, as I don't totally understand how will be that way. 2. MUST: Your %changelog is pretty empty. Please update changelog for *every* change made to the packaging, including those here. See also: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/ Guidelines#Changelogs (I haven't looked at the changelog guidelines yet) As I've been changing the version from release to git, I thought that I had to remove them, because rpmlint showed warnings of inconsistent changelog. As I uploaded everything to a git repo, I can recover the changelogs, put them at the begining, and change the release to 3.2.2, and the version of the package to the number that should be. 3. SHOULD drop extraneous mkdir in %install section, and use install -D flag installing the stuff to %_bindir instead (it'll create the target dir(s) for you). While you're at it, use -p flag too to preserve timestamps. Ok. I hope to be making the changes today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppi...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- The declared license (Artistic) is unacceptable for Fedora https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Bad_Licenses. However the wording under the same terms as Perl itself means (GPL+ or Artistic) as has been approved by Fedora legal department. (I will find the link later). Therefore you should change the license declaration from (Artistic) to (GPL+ or Artistic). Just for your information, the gperl.h reads: * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License as published by * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2.1 of the License, or (at your * option) any later version. The file is included at AppIndicator.xs:8. I hope including LGPL header file into non-LGPL does breach the LGPL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #12 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #11) However the wording under the same terms as Perl itself means (GPL+ or Artistic) as has been approved by Fedora legal department. (I will find the link later). See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120297#c5 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120299#c2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127914] Review Request: python-jsonrpclib - JSON-RPC v2.0 client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127914 Ihar Hrachyshka ihrac...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-09-15 09:58:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- As the upstream does occasionally releases, I prefer using that method, rather that commit versioning, as I don't totally understand how will be that way. The method is approximately the same, it just matters how you treat the Version: Release: tags differently. fedora's guildelines recommend you use Version: to refer to either the previous or upcoming application Version number and put the git commit/tag into Release: so, in this case, you'll end up with something like: Version: 3.2.2 Release: 1.20140914gitdec1cd6 I'd recommend you (re)read: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages and let me know if you have any more questions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141817] New: Review Request: golang-github-google-gofuzz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817 Bug ID: 1141817 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-google-gofuzz Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-github-google-gofuzz/golang-github-google-gofuzz.spec FAS username: jchaloup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #13 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- @Petr, thanks. Reverted http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator.git/commit/?id=b858399dc0d1a8b1179fabfc9754f5436a78cca7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141822] New: Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822 Bug ID: 1141822 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-googlecode-goauth2.spec FAS username: jchaloup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141817] Review Request: golang-github-google-gofuzz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141817 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps/golang-github-google-gofuzz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141807] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps/golang-github-coreos-go-etcd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701812] Review Request: brutalchess - Impressive 3D chess game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701812 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(timur.kristof@gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #6 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- SPEC URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/brutalchess/brutalchess.spec As written already in comment #5, I see legal issues with the included fonts. So I don't want to request an official review for now. The referenced sources could be downloaded via spectool. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141830] New: Review Request: golang-googlecode-uuid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141830 Bug ID: 1141830 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-uuid Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-googlecode-uuid.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 701812] Review Request: brutalchess - Impressive 3D chess game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701812 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138980] Review Request: perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator - Perl extension for libappindicator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138980 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Gtk2-AppIndicator-0.15-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141841] New: Review Request: golang-googlecode-google-api-client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141841 Bug ID: 1141841 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-google-api-client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-googlecode-google-api-client.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140403] Review Request: dreamchess - open source chess game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140403 Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: dreamchess Short Description: Portable, open-source and 3D chess game Upstream URL: http://www.dreamchess.org/ Owners: raphgro Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: lupinix -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #26 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- No SCM request found. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140403] Review Request: dreamchess - open source chess game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140403 Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140403] Review Request: dreamchess - open source chess game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140403 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #27 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Oops, I'd set fedora-cvs instead of fedora-review flag, sorry. (fixed) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141841] Review Request: golang-googlecode-google-api-client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141841 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- rpmbuild -ba golang-googlecode-google-api-client.spec ... Checking for unpackaged file(s): /usr/lib/rpm/check-files /root/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/golang-googlecode-google-api-client-0-0.1.alpha.hge1c259484b49.fc21.x86_64 error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found: /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com/p/google-api-go-client/googleapi/internal/uritemplates/LICENSE /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com/p/google-api-go-client/googleapi/internal/uritemplates/uritemplates.go /usr/share/gocode/src/code.google.com/p/google-api-go-client/googleapi/internal/uritemplates/utils.go LICENSE, uritemplates.go and utils.go are not listed in %files section. They are new from revision: 11e893087017. The newest is e1c259484b49. They should be added to %files section. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] New: Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 Bug ID: 1141861 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-github-golang-glog.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141864] New: Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-objx
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141864 Bug ID: 1141864 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-objx Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-github-stretchr-objx.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141872] New: Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-testify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141872 Bug ID: 1141872 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-testify Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-github-stretchr-testify.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141875] New: Review Request: golang-gopkg-yaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141875 Bug ID: 1141875 Summary: Review Request: golang-gopkg-yaml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-gopkg-yaml.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr ||a...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr ||a...@gmail.com --- Comment #61 from Paulo Andrade paulo.cesar.pereira.de.andr...@gmail.com --- This pseudo-patch appears to be required at least for rawhide. +sed -i 's/-xnolibs//' deps/libuv/Makefile.in + %build -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141880] New: Review Request: golang-googlecode-gcfg
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141880 Bug ID: 1141880 Summary: Review Request: golang-googlecode-gcfg Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/master/deps/golang-googlecode-gcfg/golang-googlecode-cfg.spec FAS username: jchaloup repo: https://github.com/projectatomic/kubernetes-package/tree/master/deps/golang-googlecode-gcfg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
