[Bug 1128356] Review Request: minipro - Utility for MiniPro TL866A/TL866/CS programmer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128356 --- Comment #3 from Lubomir Rintel --- SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/minipro.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/minipro-0-2.20140902git6f36b9e.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123402] Review Request: awscli - AWS Command Line Interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123402 --- Comment #4 from Lubomir Rintel --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1125033] Review Request: openstack-manila - OpenStack Shared Filesystem Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1125033 Pete Zaitcev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-09-25 01:44:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #33 from Martín Buenahora --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #32) > still includes the extraneous %doc Sorry, forgot that. Fixed. (https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/screenfetch.git/plain/screenfetch.spec) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #32 from Rex Dieter --- still includes the extraneous %doc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822718] Review Request: libesedb - Library to access the Extensible Storage Engine (ESE) Database File (EDB) format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822718 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- libesedb-20120102-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libesedb-20120102-7.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 Martín Buenahora changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #31 from Martín Buenahora --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: screenfetch Short Description: A "Bash Screenshot Information Tool" Upstream URL: https://github.com/KittyKatt/screenFetch Owners: zironid Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166 --- Comment #30 from Martín Buenahora --- Thanks for all your help, Rex! :D Updated the manpage to * (if you want the spec is here: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/screenfetch.git/plain/screenfetch.spec) I'll proced to request cvs Again, Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 244523] Review Request: ddrescue - Data recovery tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=244523 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- ddrescue-1.18.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ddrescue-1.18.1-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- md5deep-4.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-4.4-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- md5deep-4.4-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-4.4-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- md5deep-4.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/md5deep-4.4-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 845403] Review Request: onesixtyone - An efficient SNMP scanner - unretire
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845403 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- onesixtyone-0.3.2-12.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/onesixtyone-0.3.2-12.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 456385] Review Request: ptrash - Move file(s) to ~/.trash directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ptrash-1.0-3.el6|ptrash-1.0-10.el7 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- ptrash-1.0-10.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138898] Review Request: fastlz - Portable real-time compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138898 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |nrev12.el6 |nrev12.el7 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619svnrev12.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 670541] Review Request: libxc - Library of exchange and correlation functionals to be used in DFT codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=670541 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libxc-1.0-4.el5 |libxc-2.1.0-4.el7 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- libxc-2.1.0-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 583301] Review Request: whereami - Displays work location
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=583301 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|whereami-1.0-2.el6 |whereami-1.0-9.el7 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- whereami-1.0-9.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135411] Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular-Cookies - Angular-Cookies (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135411 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-XStatic-Angular-Cook |python-XStatic-Angular-Cook |ies-1.2.1.1-2.fc21 |ies-1.2.1.1-2.el7 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-XStatic-Angular-Cookies-1.2.1.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 739398] Review Request: openblas - An optimized BLAS library based on GotoBLAS2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=739398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|openblas-0.2.5-10.el6 |openblas-0.2.11-1.el7 --- Comment #52 from Fedora Update System --- openblas-0.2.11-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138898] Review Request: fastlz - Portable real-time compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138898 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |nrev12.el5 |nrev12.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619svnrev12.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: pdfcrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pdfcrack-0.14-1.el5 |pdfcrack-0.14-1.el7 --- Comment #55 from Fedora Update System --- pdfcrack-0.14-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1138898] Review Request: fastlz - Portable real-time compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138898 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619sv |nrev12.fc21 |nrev12.el5 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- fastlz-0.1.0-0.1.20070619svnrev12.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135461] Review Request: python-XStatic-Spin - Spin (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135461 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-XStatic-Spin-1.2.5.2 ||-2.el7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-09-24 20:16:39 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-XStatic-Spin-1.2.5.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1134338] Review Request: python-XStatic-Angular - Angular (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1134338 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-XStatic-Angular-1.2. |python-XStatic-Angular-1.2. |1.1-1.fc21 |1.1-1.el7 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-XStatic-Angular-1.2.1.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086790] Review Request: gnudos - A GNU library to help new users of the GNU system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086790 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|gnudos-1.7-1.fc21 |gnudos-1.7-1.el7 --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- gnudos-1.7-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 746754] Review request: pdfcrack - A Password Recovery Tool for PDF-files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=746754 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|pdfcrack-0.14-1.el6 |pdfcrack-0.14-1.el5 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- pdfcrack-0.14-1.el5 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222
--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 13 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1146222-jenkins-
junit-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata, /usr/share/jenkins,
/usr/share/jenkins/plugins
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins, /usr/share/jenkins/plugins
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
junit-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(m...@redhat.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146226] Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146226 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(m...@redhat.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Sorry, ignore comment #2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146242] Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146242 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- found non-blocking issues (see #c1), approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- found non-blocking issues (see #c1), approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146242] Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146242
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1146242-jenkins-
ant-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins/plugins, /usr/share/jenkins
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins, /usr/share/jenkins/plugins
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
ant-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{
[Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter --- Sorry, again Package Change Request == Package Name: nload New Branches: epel7 Owners: fab cicku itamarjp InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 477567] Review Request: nload - console ncurses network monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477567 --- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: nload New Branches: epel7 Owners: cicku itamarjp InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 821094] Review Request: scamper - A network measurement tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821094 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: scamper New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146213] Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146213 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- found non-blocking issues (see #c1), approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 478616] Review Request: srm - Secure file deletion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478616 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||srm Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: srm New Branches: epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1056235] Review Request: nfspy - An ID-spoofing NFS client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1056235 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: nfspy New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146213] Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146213
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1146213-jenkins-
external-monitor-job-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins/plugins, /usr/share/jenkins
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins, /usr/share/jenkins/plugins
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
external-monitor-job-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test
[Bug 550692] Review Request: tcpreen - A TCP/IP re-engineering and monitoring program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=550692 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: tcpreen New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 461358] Review Request: weplab - Analyzing WEP encryption security on wireless networks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461358 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||weplab Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: weplab New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 469494] Review Request: xlcrack - Recover lost and forgotten passwords from XLS files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=469494 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||xlcrack Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: xlcrack New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894176] Review Request: wbox - HTTP testing tool and configuration-less HTTP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894176 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Fabian Affolter --- Package Change Request == Package Name: wbox New Branches: el6 epel7 Owners: fab InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146226] Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146226
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1146226-jenkins-
javadoc-plugin/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins/plugins, /usr/share/jenkins
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/jenkins, /usr/share/jenkins/plugins
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in jenkins-
javadoc-plugin-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -r
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 --- Comment #99 from Ivan Romanov --- Ah ... first issue it is to have QCA 2.1.0 with cmake rules. But there is a critical bug ... I am fixing this now ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146242] Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146242 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Source package does not include license text, you SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 Ivan Romanov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dr...@land.ru)| --- Comment #98 from Ivan Romanov --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #95) > If you want this review to pass, options include: > * build iris packages from here, so they are shareable and usable elsewhere > (like kopete) see comment #83 , or > * use separate unbundled iris, which you seemed to prefer in comment #84 I am working on this. > but continuing to use a non-shared, bundled iris here is not an option. Yeah I know. Before I knew that all Kopete patches go to original iris. So now it is not a problem. Need only to put in order iris sources. Now Psi (I mean original Psi) seems uses some private iris headers. It's not a good. Also need to move some Psi+ iris patches to iris repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146242] Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146242 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146242] New: Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146242 Bug ID: 1146242 Summary: Review Request: jenkins-ant-plugin - Jenkins Ant Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-ant-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-ant-plugin-1.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: This package provides plugin which permits Jenkins to run Apache Ant build steps. Fedora Account System Username: msrb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1058163] Review Request: glmark2 - opengl benchmark tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058163 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jdisn...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(jdisn...@gmail.co ||m) --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- ping, any update? (assuming you're still interested in finishing the review) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 709328] Review Request: psi-plus - Jabber client based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709328 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dr...@land.ru) --- Comment #97 from Rex Dieter --- Ping, need answer to question posed in comment #95 if you're still interested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 812526] Review Request: kolab-webadmin - Kolab Groupware Web Administration Panel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=812526 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2014-09-24 16:18:55 --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter --- Marking as stalled review, feel free to reopen if you're ever interested in picking things up again. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121358] Review Request: xmlrpc-epi - An implementation of the XML-RPC protocol in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121358 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.st...@rogers.com Flags||needinfo?(shawn.starr@roger ||s.com) --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter --- Ping, I don't see any imports or builds yet. Did you forget or have some problem I can help with? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146213] Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146213 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Source package does not include license text, you SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Available 1.2-beta-1, you should update to this release. And source package does not include license text, you SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146226] Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146226 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Available 1.3-beta-1, you should update to this release. And source package does not include license text, you SHOULD query upstream to include it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1099166] Review Request: screenfetch - Display system information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099166
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #29 from Rex Dieter ---
naming: ok
license: ok
sources: ok
dff25a3e7593526390c695875f9c2ec0
screenFetch-dec1cd6c2471defe4459967fbc8ae15b55714338.tar.gz
1. SHOULD consider replacing in %files:
%doc %{_mandir}/man1/screenfetch.1.gz
with
%{_mandir}/man1/screenfetch.1*
man pages are automatically marked %doc, and the compressed filename is an
implementation detail (ie, theoretically fedora could someday switch to
uncompressed or bzip2-compressed manpages, and the build would fail).
scriptlets: ok (N/A)
macros: ok
otherwise, fairly simple and clean.
APPROVED (and sponsored).
you can move on to the next steps of the process:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #89 from Will Benton --- Package Change Request == Package Name: scala New Branches: master f20 f21 f19 epel7 Owners: willb mcpierce Sorry, Jon, I meant for this to be an ownership change of the package as well as creating the EPEL branch for Darryl, but it looks like I didn't get the request syntax right. Here's the FESCo ticket related to this: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1343 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146226] Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146226 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146226] New: Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146226 Bug ID: 1146226 Summary: Review Request: jenkins-javadoc-plugin - Jenkins Javadoc Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-javadoc-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-javadoc-plugin-1.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: This package provides plugin which adds Javadoc support to Jenkins. Fedora Account System Username: msrb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098965] Review Request: capstone - Multi-platform, multi-architecture disassembly framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098965 --- Comment #4 from Adel Gadllah --- Thanks for the review, will give you detailed answers (and fixes) this weekend. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146222] New: Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146222 Bug ID: 1146222 Summary: Review Request: jenkins-junit-plugin - Jenkins JUnit Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-junit-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-junit-plugin-1.1-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: This package provides Jenkins plugin which allows JUnit-format test results to be published. Fedora Account System Username: msrb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146213] Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146213 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146213] New: Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146213 Bug ID: 1146213 Summary: Review Request: jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin - Jenkins External Monitor Job Plugin Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/review/plugins/jenkins-external-monitor-job-plugin-1.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: This package provides Jenkins plugin which adds the ability to monitor the result of externally executed jobs. Fedora Account System Username: msrb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070398] Review Request: netstat-monitor - A command line tool to monitor network connections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- netstat-monitor-1.1.1-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 --- Comment #88 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 426867] Review Request: scala - Hybrid functional/object-oriented language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426867 Will Benton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #87 from Will Benton --- Package Change Request == Package Name: scala New Branches: epel7 Owners: willb mcpierce Here's the FESCo ticket related to this: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1343 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146181] New: Review Request: sqliteodbc - SQLite ODBC Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146181 Bug ID: 1146181 Summary: Review Request: sqliteodbc - SQLite ODBC Driver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dwro...@ertelnet.rybnik.pl QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SPECS/sqliteodbc.spec SRPM URL: https://dwrobel.fedorapeople.org/projects/rpmbuild/SRPMS/sqliteodbc-0.999-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: ODBC driver for SQLite interfacing SQLite 2.x and/or 3.x using the unixODBC or iODBC driver managers. For more information refer to: - http://www.sqlite.org- SQLite engine - http://www.unixodbc.org - unixODBC Driver Manager - http://www.iodbc.org - iODBC Driver Manager Fedora Account System Username: dwrobel Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7679014 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- hackrf-2014.08.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hackrf-2014.08.1-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/hackrf-2014.08.1-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144886] Review Request: hackrf - Utilities for HackRF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144886 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146179] New: Review Request - email-reply-parser - Email Reply Parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146179 Bug ID: 1146179 Summary: Review Request - email-reply-parser - Email Reply Parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ariel.bar...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Created attachment 940833 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=940833&action=edit output rebuild SPEC: https://arielb.fedorapeople.org/email-reply-parser.spec SRPM: https://arielb.fedorapeople.org/email-reply-parser-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Email Reply Parser for python makes it easy to grab only the last reply to an on-going email thread. Fedora Account System Username: arielb - rpmlint rpmlint email-reply-parser.spec ../SRPMS/email-reply-parser-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/email-reply-parser-0.3.0-1.fc20.noarch.rpm email-reply-parser.noarch: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. mock -r default --rebuild ../SRPMS/email-reply-parser-0.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm > test2 Attached:test2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140223] Review Request: perl-Data-Dump-Color - Like Data::Dump, but with color
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140223 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.21-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Data-Dump-Color-0.21-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1048618] Review Request: wp34s - RPN programmable calculator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048618 --- Comment #6 from Eric Smith --- The spec file is using the -k option to dos2unix, which preserves the timestamp. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #83 from Fedora Update System --- julia-0.3.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144087] Review Request: btest - A Simple Driver for Basic Unit Tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144087 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- btest-0.53-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070222] Review Request: python-impacket - Collection of Python classes providing access to network packets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070222 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-impacket-0.9.11-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070398] Review Request: netstat-monitor - A command line tool to monitor network connections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070398 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- netstat-monitor-1.1.1-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netstat-monitor-1.1.1-3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1140339] Review Request: virtme - Virtualize the running distro or a simple rootfs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140339 Yanko Kaneti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-09-24 11:27:01 --- Comment #8 from Yanko Kaneti --- All is done here I believe. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141711] Review Request: fusionforge - collaborative development tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #4 from Sylvain Beucler ---
Hi Lubomir!
> 0.) You seem to be packaging a version that does not exist?
Yes, we revamped the whole build system for the next release, and this is why
we now have a decent .spec file to propose.
I submitted it for review before the release so we can spot issues ahead :)
> 1.) You seem to disable the python precompilation:
>
> # Don't compile the .py utils from plugin-moinmoin, the pyc/pyo files are
> hard to properly package
> %global __os_install_post %(echo '%{__os_install_post}' | sed -e
> 's!/usr/lib[^[:space:]]*/brp-python-bytecompile[[:space:]].*$!!g')
>
> That is ordinarily not a good idea and would need a better explanation.
As you saw the core of this packaging relies on 'make install' and doesn't
attempt to manually relist all the files from all the different packages and
plugins at every release.
Among these files is are 3 MoinMoin glue/config files:
/usr/share/fusionforge/plugins/moinmoin/lib/fusionforge.py
/usr/share/fusionforge/plugins/moinmoin/lib/farmconfig.py
/usr/share/fusionforge/plugins/moinmoin/lib/ff_groups.py
Recent RPM now attempts to compile them automatically, creating new files, and
then it complains they not packaged!
I'd like to avoid making exception and relisting explicitely those files, which
incidentally are never compiled in any other FusionForge install or packaging,
hence why I disabled the Python bytecode compilation for these 3 files.
I would welcome a generic approach to tackle this issue.
> 2.) Your %post scriptlets seem to be somewhat fragile (some, maybe not all)
Indeed the installation requires a working database connection.
I'll add a README to explain how to relaunch
/usr/share/fusionforge/post-install.d/xxx if there's a problem during install.
> 3.) You use line breaks in weird places.
You mean I sometimes use "\n\n"? This clearly separates the different
sub-packages (since there is an empty line in the description, one line only is
not enough for my brain).
> 4.) Your section ordering is rather unusual.
The plugins sections gets automatically included in the .spec file, see
rpm/gen_spec.sh.
It will be pretty complex and far less readable to insert all the plugins bits
everywhere through the .spec file, rather than in a single bloc at the end.
(also I think it suits this package better :))
> 5.) rpmlint is very unhappy.
I had tried on my stable F20 but apparently quite a new tests were added.
What version are you using?
> fusionforge-web.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
> /usr/share/fusionforge/www/plugins/authbuiltin ../../plugins/authbuiltin/www
> fusionforge-web.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink
> /usr/share/fusionforge/www/DTD ../common/DTD
The targets are in fusionforge-common, which the package depends on.
I'll prepare a new srpm to fix the other warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070398] Review Request: netstat-monitor - A command line tool to monitor network connections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070398 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- netstat-monitor-1.1.1-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/netstat-monitor-1.1.1-3.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070398] Review Request: netstat-monitor - A command line tool to monitor network connections
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070398 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091203] Review Request: clpeak - Find peak OpenCL capacities like bandwidth & compute
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091203 Fabian Deutsch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(fdeutsch@redhat.c | |om) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122944] Review Request: rubygem-jquery-datatables-rails - jQuery datatables for rails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122944 Josef Stribny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-jquery-datatables-r ||ails-2.2.3-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-09-24 10:21:01 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122939] Review Request: rubygem-jquery-ui-rails - jQuery UI packaged for the Rails asset pipeline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122939 Josef Stribny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-jquery-ui-rails-5.0 ||.0-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-09-24 10:13:36 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799558] Review Request: xfce4-soundmenu-plugin - MPRIS2 control plugin for the Xfce panel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799558 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2014-09-24 08:26:15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1074515] Review Request: passenger - Passenger Ruby web application server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1074515 Marcela Mašláňová changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #24 from Marcela Mašláňová --- I was able to rebuild it in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7675225 Please, remove the condition in tmpfiles.d. I guess Vit found all possible Ruby problems. I reviewed all comments, specfile and installation. It looks good to me, let's finally APPROVE it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141872] Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-testify - Tools for testifying that your code will behave as you intend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141872 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-09-24 07:20:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 Bug 1122176 depends on bug 1141872, which changed state. Bug 1141872 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-testify - Tools for testifying that your code will behave as you intend https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141872 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141864] Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-objx - Go package for dealing with maps, slices, JSON and other data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141864 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-09-24 07:19:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
