date:20141005

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsysstat-0.1.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsysstat-0.1.0-1.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsysstat-0.1.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsysstat-0.1.0-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1140377] Review Request: python-XStatic-Font-Awesome - Font-Awesome (XStatic packaging standard)

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140377



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-XStatic-Font-Awesome-4.1.0.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-XStatic-Font-Awesome-4.1.0.0-2.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1140377] Review Request: python-XStatic-Font-Awesome - Font-Awesome (XStatic packaging standard)

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140377

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566



--- Comment #2 from David Brown  ---
I fixed some minor spelling and tab issues.

16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 23 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149566] Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566



--- Comment #1 from David Brown  ---
Here's the rpmlint output.

slurm.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
slurm.src:19: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 19, tab: line 1)
slurm.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scalable -> salable,
callable, calculable
slurm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpmi2.so.0.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
slurm.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/salloc
slurm.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libpmi.so.0.0.0
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath /usr/lib64/libpmi.so.0.0.0
['/usr/lib64']
slurm.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/slurm/src/srun/srun.wrapper.c
slurm.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/slurm/LICENSE.OpenSSL
slurm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/slurm/cgroup/release_freezer
slurm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/slurm/cgroup/release_memory
slurm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/slurm/cgroup/release_cpuset
slurm.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib64/slurm/src/sattach/sattach.wrapper.c
slurm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file /etc/slurm/slurm.epilog.clean
slurm.x86_64: E: executable-marked-as-config-file
/etc/slurm/cgroup.release_common.example
slurm-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
slurm-lua.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US proctrack -> protract
slurm-munge.x86_64: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) crypto -> crypt, crypts,
crypt o
slurm-munge.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US crypto -> crypt,
crypts, crypt o
slurm-pam_slurm.x86_64: E: binary-or-shlib-defines-rpath
/lib64/security/pam_slurm.so ['/usr/lib64']
slurm-sjstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US availablilty ->
availability
slurm-sjstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US sinfo -> info, s
info, sinful
slurm-sjstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US squeue -> queue,
queues, s queue
slurm-sjstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US scontrol ->
control, controls, s control
slurm-sjstat.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US utilites ->
utilities, utilizes, utility
slurm-slurmdbd.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US slurmctld ->
slurred
slurm-slurmdb-direct.x86_64: W: non-etc-or-var-file-marked-as-conffile
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/config.slurmdb.pl
slurm-slurmdb-direct.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary moab_2_slurmdb
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qhold
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qstat
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qdel
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary pbsnodes
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qalter
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qrerun
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mpiexec
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qsub
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qrls
slurm-torque.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary generate_pbs_nodefile
16 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 9 errors, 29 warnings.

Many of the errors are because slurm has a lot of script hooks that reside 
out in /etc. These intended to be modified by users for their own custom 
cluster needs.

$ rpm -qlp results_slurm/14.03.8/1.fc20/slurm-14.03.8-1.fc20.x86_64.rpm | grep
'\.c$'
/usr/lib64/slurm/src/sattach/sattach.wrapper.c
/usr/lib64/slurm/src/srun/srun.wrapper.c

These are used for parallel debuggers like TotalView (shrug). Its the way
upstream packages the source.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149566] New: Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149566

Bug ID: 1149566
   Summary: Review Request: slurm - Simple LinUx Resource Manager
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: david.br...@pnnl.gov
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://github.com/dmlb2000/slurm-spec/raw/master/slurm.spec
SRPM URL:
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1774/7771774/slurm-14.03.8-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description:
Slurm is an open source, fault-tolerant, and highly
scalable cluster management and job scheduling system for Linux clusters.
Components include machine status, partition management, job management,
scheduling and accounting modules

Fedora Account System Username: dmlb2000

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1122244] Review Request: nodejs-superagent-proxy - Request proxy(uri) superagent extension

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122244

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-superagent-proxy-0.3 |nodejs-superagent-proxy-0.3
   |.0-2.fc19   |.0-2.fc20



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-superagent-proxy-0.3.0-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1040517] Review Request: julia - High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040517

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|julia-0.3.1-2.fc21  |julia-0.3.1-2.fc20



--- Comment #87 from Fedora Update System  ---
julia-0.3.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141446] Review Request: perl-Pod-Snippets - Extract and reformat snippets of POD

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141446

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1122244] Review Request: nodejs-superagent-proxy - Request proxy(uri) superagent extension

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122244

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||nodejs-superagent-proxy-0.3
   ||.0-2.fc19
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-superagent-proxy-0.3.0-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149556] Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty Printing

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149556

Ricky Elrod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rel...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rel...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149554] Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order unification

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149554

Ricky Elrod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rel...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rel...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149550] Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative command-line option parsing and documentation library

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149550

Ricky Elrod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rel...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rel...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language Compiler

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558

Ricky Elrod  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rel...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rel...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language Compiler

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||purescript



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149554] Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order unification

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149554

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1149558




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558
[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language
Compiler
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language Compiler

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1149550, 1149554, 1149556
 Whiteboard||NotReady



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
http://www.purescript.org/


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149550
[Bug 1149550] Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative command-line
option parsing and documentation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149554
[Bug 1149554] Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order
unification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149556
[Bug 1149556] Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty
Printing
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149556] Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty Printing

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149556

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1149558




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558
[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language
Compiler
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149550] Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative command-line option parsing and documentation library

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149550

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1149558




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558
[Bug 1149558] Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language
Compiler
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 664151] Review Request: ghc-Diff - A O(ND) diff algorithm in Haskell

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664151



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ghc-Diff-0.3.0-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149558] New: Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming Language Compiler

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149558

Bug ID: 1149558
   Summary: Review Request: purescript - PureScript Programming
Language Compiler
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/purescript.spec
SRPM URL:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/purescript-0.5.6.2-1.fc20.src.rpm

Description:
A small strongly, statically typed programming language with expressive types,
inspired by Haskell and compiling to Javascript.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149556] Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty Printing

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149556



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771648

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149556] New: Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty Printing

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149556

Bug ID: 1149556
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-pattern-arrows - Arrows for Pretty
Printing
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-pattern-arrows.spec
SRPM URL:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-pattern-arrows-0.0.2-1.fc20.src.rpm

Description:
A library for generating concise pretty printers based on precedence rules.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149554] Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order unification

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149554



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771642

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149554] New: Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order unification

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149554

Bug ID: 1149554
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-monad-unify - Generic first-order
unification
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-monad-unify.spec
SRPM URL:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-monad-unify-0.2.2-1.fc20.src.rpm

Description:
Generic first-order unification.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149550] Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative command-line option parsing and documentation library

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149550



--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen  ---
This package built on koji: 
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771638

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149550] New: Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative command-line option parsing and documentation library

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149550

Bug ID: 1149550
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cmdtheline - Declarative
command-line option parsing and documentation library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-cmdtheline.spec
SRPM URL:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-cmdtheline-0.2.3-1.fc20.src.rpm

Description:
CmdTheLine aims to remove tedium from the definition of command-line programs,
producing usage and help with little effort.

The inspiration was found in Daniel Bunzli's
 library.

CmdTheLine uses applicative functors to provide a declarative, compositional
mechanism for defining command-line programs by lifting regular Haskell
functions over argument parsers.

A tutorial can be found at
.

Suggestions, comments, and bug reports are appreciated. Please see the bug and
issue tracker at .

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 504641] Review Request: sendxmpp - A perl script to send xmpp messages

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=504641

Robert Scheck  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d
   ||e
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #6 from Robert Scheck  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: sendxmpp
New Branches: epel7
Owners: robert

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149524] New: Review Request: perl-Digest-Whirlpool - Interface to Whirlpool hash algorithm

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149524

Bug ID: 1149524
   Summary: Review Request: perl-Digest-Whirlpool - Interface to
Whirlpool hash algorithm
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: de...@fateyev.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/perl-Digest-Whirlpool.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.fateyev.com/RPMS/Fedora20/testing/SRPMS/perl-Digest-Whirlpool-2.03-1.fc20.denf.src.rpm
Description: This module provides an interface to Whirlpool hash algorithm.
Whirlpool is a 512-bit, collision-resistant, one-way hash function developed by
Paulo S. L. M. Barreto and Vincent Rijmen. It has been recommended by the
NESSIE project (along with SHA-256/384/512) and adopted as ISO/IEC 10118-3.
This module subclasses Digest::base and can be used either directly or through
the Digest meta-module.
Fedora Account System Username: dfateyev

Koji scratch builds:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771340 (Rawhide)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771336 (Fedora 21)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771351 (EPEL 7)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7771347 (EPEL 6)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1147743] Review Request: nose-cov - nose plugin for coverage reporting

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147743

John Dulaney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #11 from John Dulaney  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-nose-cov
Short Description: nose plugin for coverage reporting
Upstream URL: http://bitbucket.org/memedough/nose-cov/overview
Owners: jdulaney
Branches: f19 f20 f21
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141446] Review Request: perl-Pod-Snippets - Extract and reformat snippets of POD

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141446



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc19

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141446] Review Request: perl-Pod-Snippets - Extract and reformat snippets of POD

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141446



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141446] Review Request: perl-Pod-Snippets - Extract and reformat snippets of POD

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141446

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141446] Review Request: perl-Pod-Snippets - Extract and reformat snippets of POD

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141446



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Pod-Snippets-0.14-3.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1147743] Review Request: nose-cov - nose plugin for coverage reporting

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147743

Haïkel Guémar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Haïkel Guémar  ---
Since this package complies with Fedora packaging guidelines,
I hereby approve it into Fedora Packages collection



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[x] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/haikel/1147743-python-nose-cov/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[-]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: ta

[Bug 1006197] Review Request: stockfish - Powerful open source chess engine

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1006197



--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner  ---
(In reply to Dhiru Kholia from comment #5)
…
> Spec URL:
> https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/stockfish/stockfish.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://bitbucket.org/dhiru/packages/raw/master/stockfish/stockfish-4-2.fc19.
> src.rpm

% rpmlint stockfish.spec stockfish-4-2.fc22.x86_64.rpm
stockfish-4-2.fc19.src.rpm 
stockfish.spec: W: invalid-url Source1: stockfish-231-book.zip
Should be OK, since you're providing the file in your SRPM.

stockfish.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eboard -> board,
aboard, e board
Maybe easily fixable.

stockfish.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/stockfish/Copying.txt
You may use the tool dos2unix to fix this.

stockfish.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary stockfish
Not needed if upstream does not provide.

stockfish.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eboard -> board, aboard,
e board
Ignored. False positive.


Remove ExclusiveArch cause those are now the default primary ones in rawhide.

You should use macros where possible:
- sed -i "/Book File/s:book.bin:/usr/share/stockfish/Book.bin:"
src/ucioption.cpp
+ sed -i "/Book File/s:book.bin:%{_datadir}/%{name}/Book.bin:"
src/ucioption.cpp

The folder /var/games is marked as deprecated in FHS. What is
/var/games/stockfish/polyglot.ini about, configuration? If so, consider to move
the file into folder /etc/stockfish/ instead and patch the source to find it
there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 770740] Review Request: morse - Simulates robots using the Blender Game Engine

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770740

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||spencerandrewjackson@yahoo.
   ||com
  Flags||needinfo?(spencerandrewjack
   ||s...@yahoo.com)



--- Comment #10 from Raphael Groner  ---
Any news here? I could take the review process if you may like.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141390] Review Request: perl-DBIx-RunSQL - Run SQL commands from a file

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141390



--- Comment #4 from Denis Fateyev  ---
Yes, I think it would be okay here (with keeping Pod::Readme and dropping
Pod::Markdown) since Pod::Readme will be available soon in all Fedora/RHEL
scope.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 755510] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet - Gnome shell system monitor extension

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755510



--- Comment #62 from nicolas.vievi...@univ-valenciennes.fr ---
Hello Community,

Last upgrade from last upstream release. New SPEC, SRPMS files and noarch RPMS
packages for testing are provided (F-20, ***new*** F-21 and Rawhide - see above
to know how to compose the URL to download RPMS noarch files). New rpmlint
reports provided too. Previous RPMS, SRPMS en SPEC files for F-20 and Rawhide
are no longer available.

Rawhide Spec URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25699833/Fedora/Rawhide/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec

Rawhide SRPM URL:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/25699833/Fedora/Rawhide/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet/gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-0.0.1-0.1.gita232cb0.fc22.src.rpm


Project URL: https://github.com/paradoxxxzero/gnome-shell-system-monitor-applet

rpmlint for Rawhide

rpmlint gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet.spec
0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

rpmlint
gnome-shell-extension-system-monitor-applet-0.0.1-0.1.gita232cb0.fc22.src.rpm
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Cordially,


-- 
NVieville

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1128841] Review Request: openmortal - Parody of an once popular coin-up fighting game

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128841



--- Comment #17 from Raphael Groner  ---
At least, thin.ttf is definitely not redistributable within Fedora. Fontforge
warns about an FS Type of 2 and "not editable".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 701812] Review Request: brutalchess - Impressive 3D chess game

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=701812



--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner  ---
Fontforge warns me that Ghostwri.ttf has a "not editable" licence:
marked with an FS Type of 2 (Restricted Licence)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1147922] Review Request: XTandem - X!TANDEM Spectrum Modeler

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147922

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande  ---
Thank you Martin.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: XTandem
Short Description: X!TANDEM Spectrum Modeler
Upstream URL: http://www.thegpm.org/tandem/
Owners: sagitter
Branches: f20 f21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1149423] Review Request: gnurobbo - Port of the once famous ATARI game Robbo

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149423



--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner  ---
Update and new build.

Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/gnurobbo/gnurobbo.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/gnurobbo/gnurobbo-0.66-0.2.20141005svn412.fc20.src.rpm

koji rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7769950
koji f21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7770329

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1148936] Review Request: python-paho-mqtt - A Python MQTT version 3.1/3.1.1 client class

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148936

Florian "der-flo" Lehner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Unknown or generated".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 122880 bytes in 10 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
 -paho-mqtt
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-Engli

[Bug 1148935] Review Request: python-ipgetter - A Python module to fetch the external IP address

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148935

Florian "der-flo" Lehner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "WTFPL WTFPL (v2)", "Unknown or generated".
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python3-ipgetter
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains

[Bug 1148982] Review Request: python-aiohttp - A Python http client/server for asyncio

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148982

Florian "der-flo" Lehner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
   ---> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7770252
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should

[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700

Lokesh Mandvekar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request:
   |golang-github-bmizerany-ass |golang-github-bmizerany-ass
   |ert - Blake Mizerany and|ert - Assertions for Go
   |Keith Rarick|tests
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar  ---
update description as in Bug Summary :)


Rest looks good as per Golang packaging drafts.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 434698] Review Request: md5deep - A set of cross-platform tools to compute hashes

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434698

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|md5deep-4.4-1.fc21  |md5deep-4.4-1.fc20



--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System  ---
md5deep-4.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.  If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1 |python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1
   |.1-2.fc20   |.1-2.fc19



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1.1-2.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1132971] Review Request: python-pyvmomi - pyVmomi is the Python SDK for the VMware vSphere API that allows you to manage ESX, ESXi, and vCenter

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132971

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1 |python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1
   |.1-2.fc21   |.1-2.fc20



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyvmomi-5.5.0.2014.1.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146551] Review Request: nex - A lexer generator for Go that is similar to Lex/Flex

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146551



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
nex-20140621-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1142445] Review Request: cyreal-wireone-fonts - Wire One font by Alexei Vanyashin and Gayaneh Bagdasaryan

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142445

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000- |cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-
   |0.1.20140916hg.fc21 |0.2.20140916hg.fc20



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
cyreal-wireone-fonts-1.000-0.2.20140916hg.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20
stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1146551] Review Request: nex - A lexer generator for Go that is similar to Lex/Flex

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146551



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nex-20140621-1.fc19 has been pushed to the Fedora 19 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1144000] Review Request: autotrash - Automatically take-out the trash

2014-10-05 Thread bugzilla

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144000

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|autotrash-0.1.5-2.fc20  |autotrash-0.1.5-2.fc21



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
autotrash-0.1.5-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

59 matches

Mail list logo