[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jstri...@redhat.com --- Comment #10 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Hi Ingvar, I accidentally opened a second review request[0]. Can I ask you whether you want to continue with this? If so, I am gonna close mine as a duplicate. Also I briefly looked at your spec and some tests can be actually run [1] so you can try to run them. [0] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150151 [1] http://data-strzibny.rhcloud.com/rubygem-log4r.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150151] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Log4r, logging framework for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150151 --- Comment #3 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- I asked Ingvar and I will close this as duplicate if applicable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829892] Review Request: python27 - Parallel-installable Python 2.7 for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829892 Moez Roy moez@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |urgent Summary|Review Request: python27 - |Review Request: python27 - |Parallel-installable Python |Parallel-installable Python |2.7 for EPEL|2.7 for EL6 OS|Linux |All Severity|medium |urgent -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150152] Review Request: rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint - Internal HashiCorp service to check version information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150152 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Thanks for the review. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint Short Description: Internal HashiCorp service to check version information Upstream URL: http://www.hashicorp.com Owners: jstribny Branches: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #13 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- Hi Petr, f20 and f21 are already available. el6 fails due to a missing dependency on perl(Class::XSAccessor) - http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7809082 I'd be happy to maintain el6 if you could arrange Class::XSAccessor to be included in el6. Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Mo New Branches: epel7 Owners: ddick InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 --- Comment #11 from Ingvar Hagelund ing...@linpro.no --- Maintaining this package doesn't seem much work, so I'd like to continue, please :-) I'll add the tests that actually run, and put up a new package. Ingvar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1136389] Review Request: rubygem-rspec2-core - Rspec-2 runner and formatters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136389 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Ok, the naming is imperfect in either case and there are other packages that follow this convention so I agree. == APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1136384] Review Request: rubygem-rspec2-expectations - Rspec 2 expectations (should and matchers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136384 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Thanks. == APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1136385] Review Request: rubygem-rspec2-mocks - Rspec 2 doubles (mocks and stubs)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136385 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- The package looks good now == APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1136390] Review Request: rubygem-rspec2 - Behaviour driven development (BDD) framework for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1136390 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Spec looks sane, package builds and runs. Rpmlint complains about: rubygem-rspec2.noarch: W: obsolete-not-provided rubygem-rspec which is sane as well. = APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148477] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gomock - Mocking framework for the Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148477 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148477] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gomock - Mocking framework for the Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148477 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148477] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gomock - Mocking framework for the Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148477 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148477] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gomock - Mocking framework for the Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148477 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150151] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Log4r, logging framework for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150151 Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-10-09 04:35:15 --- Comment #4 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 905240 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 --- Comment #12 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- *** Bug 1150151 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240 --- Comment #13 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com --- Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829892] Review Request: python27 - Parallel-installable Python 2.7 for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829892 Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mc...@redhat.com --- Comment #17 from Matěj Cepl mc...@redhat.com --- This seems like a very bad idea ... one should use Software Collections for this. For example https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/rhscl/python27/ (or supported ones for RHEL). I would suggest CLOSED/WONTFIX. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148484] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-gomdb - Go wrapper for LMDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148484 Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: golang-github-influxdb-gomdb Short Description: Go wrapper for LMDB Upstream URL: https://github.com/influxdb/gomdb Owners: jchaloup lsm5 vbatts Branches: f21 f20 f19 el6 InitialCC: golang-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148484] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-gomdb - Go wrapper for LMDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148484 --- Comment #5 from Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com --- Hi, Jon, golang-github-influxdb-gomdb is still not created. Can you take a look at it again? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148529] Review Request: python-flask-rstpages - Adds support for reStructuredText to a Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148529 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148481] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-exp - Experimental tools and packages for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148481 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148481] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-exp - Experimental tools and packages for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148481 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148481] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-exp - Experimental tools and packages for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148481 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148481] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-exp - Experimental tools and packages for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148481 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148816] Review Request: python-XStatic-Bootstrap-Datepicker - Bootstrap-Datepicker (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148816 Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150504] Review Request: openstack-ironic-discoverd - hardware properties discovery daemon for OpenStack Ironic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150504 --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com --- As part of the sponsoring process, I will ask to do two informal reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148529 + one taken from this list http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (preferably non-green ones) I suggest you look at the fedora-review tool to assist you and Fedora Packaging Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines This is to assess your understanding of packaging and our guidelines, as until you're sponsored, I can't approve yet your package (which should be fast) When you're done, please link the two reviews here and set the needinfo flag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148692] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148692 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148692] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148692 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148692] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148692 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148692] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148692 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148460] Review Request: golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema - Package for creating Google Big Query from Go structs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148460] Review Request: golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema - Package for creating Google Big Query from Go structs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148460] Review Request: golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema - Package for creating Google Big Query from Go structs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148460] Review Request: golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema - Package for creating Google Big Query from Go structs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150284] Review Request: perl-CGI-Deurl-XS - Fast decoder for URL parameter strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150284
Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com ---
--- a/perl-CGI-Deurl-XS.spec
+++ b/perl-CGI-Deurl-XS.spec
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Name: perl-CGI-Deurl-XS
Version:0.07
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Fast decoder for URL parameter strings
-License:GPL+ or Artistic
+License:(GPL+ or Artistic) and ASL 2.0
Group: Development/Libraries
URL:http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Deurl-XS/
Source0:
http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/CGI/CGI-Deurl-XS-%{version}.tar.gz
@@ -13,6 +13,8 @@ BuildRequires: perl(encoding)
BuildRequires: perl(Exporter)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::Constant)
BuildRequires: perl(ExtUtils::MakeMaker)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Copy)
+BuildRequires: perl(File::Spec)
BuildRequires: perl(strict)
BuildRequires: perl(Test::More)
BuildRequires: perl(warnings)
--
Approving.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150284] Review Request: perl-CGI-Deurl-XS - Fast decoder for URL parameter strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150284 David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-CGI-Deurl-XS Short Description: Fast decoder for URL parameter strings Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/CGI-Deurl-XS/ Owners: ddick Branches: f20, f21, epel7, el6 InitialCC: perl-sig Thanks for the review Petr. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150959] New: Review Request: CAROL - Common Architecture for RMI Objectweb Layer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150959 Bug ID: 1150959 Summary: Review Request: CAROL - Common Architecture for RMI Objectweb Layer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: wei.d.c...@intel.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/chendave/OAT2.X-fedora21-Dependencies/blob/master/carol.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/chendave/OAT2.X-fedora21-Dependencies/blob/master/carol-2.0.7-1_1fc.src.rpm Could anyone give some review on this package, appreciate for any comments you drop by. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150105] Review Request: python-pynn - Simulator-independent specification of neuronal network models
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150105 Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NOTREADY --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) sanjay.an...@gmail.com --- This isn't very useful until we have NEURON, NEST and BRIAN packaged. Marking as not ready. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099 --- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com --- You can perform tests by using 'nosetests' and build documentation. See doc/source/developers_guide.rst . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144111] Review Request: copr-keygen - Copr aux service that generate keys for sign.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144111 --- Comment #4 from Miroslav Suchý msu...@redhat.com --- copr-keygen.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Part of Copr build system. Aux service that generate keys for sign. copr-keygen.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/share/copr-keygen/application.py 0644L /usr/bin/python3 copr-keygen.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/objects.inv copr-keygen.noarch: W: non-executable-in-bin /usr/bin/gpg_copr.sh 0644L copr-keygen.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/bin/gpg_copr.sh 0644L /bin/bash copr-keygen.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/.buildinfo copr-keygen.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/copr-keygen wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/_static/jquery.js and bundled jquery. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148956] Review Request: python-XStatic-Bootstrap-SCSS - Bootstrap-SCSS (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148956 Alan Pevec ape...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ape...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ape...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 752829] Review Request: glue-validator - A validation framework for GLUE 2.0 information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=752829 Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Steve Traylen steve.tray...@cern.ch --- Package Change Request == Package Name: glue-validator New Branches: epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144111] Review Request: copr-keygen - Copr aux service that generate keys for sign.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144111 --- Comment #5 from Valentin Gologuzov vgolo...@redhat.com --- SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/~vgologuz/keygen-1.58_WIP/copr-keygen-1.58-1.git.47.af3ad7e.fc20.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/~vgologuz/keygen-1.58_WIP/copr-keygen.spec copr-keygen.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Part of Copr build system. Fixed copr-keygen.noarch: E: non-executable-script ... Fixed copr-keygen.noarch: W: hidden-file-or-dir /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/.buildinfo Fixed by cleanup of .buildinfo copr-keygen.noarch: W: log-files-without-logrotate /var/log/copr-keygen Logs are rotated by python log handler copr-keygen.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/objects.inv This file is binary in fact ( mix of text header and zlib compressed data) wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding /usr/share/doc/copr-keygen/html/_static/jquery.js This file produced by python-sphinx, so accept that or remove all sphinx generated documentation and only publish docs to readthedocs.org . About end-of-line is jquery.js: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107813 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148529] Review Request: python-flask-rstpages - Adds support for reStructuredText to a Flask application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148529
Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||divius.ins...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com ---
Hi! Some comments to this package:
1. Inconsistent python2 and python3 packages naming (note case):
python-flask-rstpages-0.3-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
python3-Flask-RSTPages-0.3-1.fc20.noarch.rpm
2. sphinx-build-3.3 docs html
I suggest using just sphinx-build-3 (it's also present). There's no point in
assuming specific version of Python 3.
E.g. in F21 your package fails to build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7811395
3. You should BuildRequire python[3]-flask, otherwise Sphinx fails with
ImportError on building docs.
4. You have this line (likely due to following Python packaging guide):
find %{py3dir} -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '1s|^#!python|#!%{__python3}|'
but the guide also states symmetric:
find -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '1s|^#!python|#!%{__python2}|'
after Python 3 part.
5. %doc html docs/_themes/LICENSE LICENSE
Here one LICENSE file is overwriting another, so only the last is actually
included.
Smaller things:
1. Somewhere your spec is using
%if %{?with_python3}
somewhere
%if 0%{?with_python3}
I guess it should be just
%if 0%{?with_python3}
everywhere, but at least it should be consistent.
2. Just a suggestion: won't it be good to
Provide: Flask-RSTPages
so that people can easily find it?
F20 build for reference:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7811450
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150504] Review Request: openstack-ironic-discoverd - hardware properties discovery daemon for OpenStack Ironic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150504 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com --- First review ready, second to go soon: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148529#c1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148705] Review Request: golang-github-jmhodges-levigo - Go wrapper for LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148705 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148705] Review Request: golang-github-jmhodges-levigo - Go wrapper for LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148705 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148705] Review Request: golang-github-jmhodges-levigo - Go wrapper for LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148705 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148705] Review Request: golang-github-jmhodges-levigo - Go wrapper for LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148705 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148735] Review Request: golang-googlecode-log4go - Logging package similar to log4j for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148735 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148735] Review Request: golang-googlecode-log4go - Logging package similar to log4j for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148735 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148735] Review Request: golang-googlecode-log4go - Logging package similar to log4j for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148735 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148735] Review Request: golang-googlecode-log4go - Logging package similar to log4j for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148735 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 960061] Review Request: rubygem-guard - Guard gives notifications about file modifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960061 Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com --- The rubygem-listen was updated recently, so this review could continue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 474818] Review Request: perl-Class-XSAccessor - Generate fast XS accessors without runtime compilation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474818 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||psab...@redhat.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: perl-Class-XSAccessor New Branches: el6 Owners: psabata InitialCC: perl-sig I'd like to get this into EPEL6 for #1132356. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 --- Comment #14 from Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com --- (In reply to David Dick from comment #13) I'd be happy to maintain el6 if you could arrange Class::XSAccessor to be included in el6. Thanks, David. I've requested the el6 branch and will let you know once it's ready. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 Petr Šabata psab...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? fedora-cvs+ |fedora-review+ fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 225341] Review Request: php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer - PHP coding standards enforcement tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225341 Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@famillecollet.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: php-pear-PHP-CodeSniffer New Branches: epel7 Owners: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109717] Review Request: python-evtx - Windows Event Log parsing library and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109717
Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||divius.ins...@gmail.com
--- Comment #7 from Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com ---
Hi!
1. BuildRequires: python
should be
BuildRequires: python2-devel
2. find Evtx -name '*.py' | xargs sed -i '/\/usr\/bin\/python/d'
I think it would be better to check for shebang only, something like:
| xargs sed -i ''/^#!.*\/python/d'
3. Why not use summary and description from package's setup.py?
https://github.com/williballenthin/python-evtx/blob/master/setup.py
Also I think in Programming documentation for %{name} using full summary of
the base package would be more helpful for a user.
Newer build for reference:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7811652
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150504] Review Request: openstack-ironic-discoverd - hardware properties discovery daemon for OpenStack Ironic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150504 Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Tantsur divius.ins...@gmail.com --- The second: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109717#c7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 950171] Review Request: librecad - Computer Assisted Design (CAD) Application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=950171 --- Comment #38 from Tom spot Callaway tcall...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Alain Portal from comment #36) Can we hope a package for EPEL6? No. The EPEL6 compiler is too old, librecad depends on c++11 features that didn't show up until gcc 4.7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822283] Review Request: vim-omnicppcomplete - vim c++ completion omnifunc with a ctags database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283 Marc Deop m...@marcdeop.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(m...@marcdeop.com | |) | --- Comment #10 from Marc Deop m...@marcdeop.com --- Hello, I am really sorry for the delay (if we can even call it delay). I do plan on importing this, give me 10 more days please. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141711] Review Request: fusionforge - collaborative development tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141711
--- Comment #13 from Sylvain Beucler b...@beuc.net ---
(In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #9)
Sorry it took so long and thanks for the patience.
Reviewing a package of this complexity requires some extra setup, especially
as you seem to do very dangerous things from the scriptlets.
So, here we go; it still needs some amount of work:
0.) % characters in comments:
# Marking /etc as conffiles and exclude locales (cf. mandatory %find_lang)
# Not using recursive dirs listing because that is processed when all
# packages are mixed in the common install dir (so using %dir instead)
Please escape them: s/%/%%/. Otherwise RPM attempts to expand them.
Done.
1.) Your %descriptions for subpackage do not make much sense
They're all the same. Please describe what the package is for.
They begin with a general stanza about FusionForge but continue with a
description of the sub-package.
The summaries can be improved a bit too. E.g.:
Summary: Collaborative development tool - CAS authentication
Can be better written as:
Summary: CAS authentication plugin for Fusionforge
CAS authentication is an existing gettext string that is directly extracted
from the plugin.
I changed to FusionForge plugin - CAS authentication to be able to reuse
translated strings.
2.) Please try to keep the whitespace less crazy
Please crop the four line breaks above %changelog to two.
Done.
3.) Your scriptlets seem to do insane things
Following the discussion above we can conclude that post-install scripts need
to be removed. README.Fedora still explains what to do after install.
Done.
Please let me know directly when a fix is incomplete - this issue was adressed
2 weeks ago (comment #4) by adding documentation, and we only knew that this
eventually wasn't enough yesterday.
Some tips:
* Do _NOT_ assume database is running
* Do not fail under any circumstances
* Do not spew any output
To verify, try to use install your packages from a kickstart -- do an
unattended installation or run livecd-creator and ensure your log is empty.
3.0.) Do not attempt to create directories that you already ship in the
package.
Installing : fusionforge-common-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
77/136
useradd: warning: the home directory already exists.
Not copying any file from skel directory into it.
3.1.) Do not enable or disable sevices
Installing : fusionforge-db-local-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
99/136 Note: Forwarding request to 'systemctl enable postgresql.service'.
ln -s '/usr/lib/systemd/system/postgresql.service'
'/etc/systemd/system/multi-user.target.wants/postgresql.service'
...
Note: Forwarding request to 'systemctl enable httpd.service'.
...
That is system operator's duty. With systemd, you may want to create a target
that depends on services you need.
3.2.) Avoid debugging output
Installing : fusionforge-db-local-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
99/136
...
Importing initial database...
Running script: 20100308-drop-forum-attachment-type.sql
/usr/share/fusionforge/db/20100308-drop-forum-attachment-type.sql ran
correctly
Installing : fusionforge-plugin-scmsvn-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
132/136
Running /usr/share/fusionforge/plugins/scmsvn/bin/install.sh configure
Modifying inetd for Subversion server
TODO: xinetd support
Direct it to a log if needed.
3.3.) Note that there might not be enough entropy available
Generating RSA private key, 1024 bit long modulus
.++
.++
e is 65537 (0x10001)
Ensure this can not lock up system forever. It's probably better done in a
separate service, on startup and asynchronously. See what sshd does.
3.4.) Use systemd integration properly
Installing : fusionforge-plugin-admssw-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
102/136
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl reload httpd.service
If you need to refresh a service, do not call /sbin/service. See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
3.5.) Do not assume a database is running
Installing : fusionforge-shell-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
109/136
...
Could not connect to database
Scriptlet might be running from a kickstart or during system installation.
3.6.) Do not do this:
Installing : fusionforge-shell-5.3.50+201410011756-1.fc20.noarch
109/136
...
useradd: cannot create directory /nonexistent
The nonexistent directory is supposedly nonexistent. Also, it makes the
security policy angry:
type=AVC msg=audit(1412781994.848:906): avc: denied { create } for
pid=28546 comm=useradd name=nonexistent
scontext=unconfined_u:system_r:useradd_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023
tcontext=system_u:object_r:etc_runtime_t:s0 tclass=dir permissive=0
For the record, the upstream installation script didn't use useradd -M which
forces disabling homedir creation, which itself is normally
[Bug 1151072] New: Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072 Bug ID: 1151072 Summary: Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mstuc...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/fig.spec SRPM URL: https://mstuchli.fedorapeople.org/fig-0.5.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker Fedora Account System Username:mstuchli Based on spec from rhbz#1129889. I've added bunch of missing BuildRequires, added patch that unbundles python-docker and python-six, disabled %check section (the test suite requires running Docker) and made few smaller changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829892] Review Request: python27 - Parallel-installable Python 2.7 for EL6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829892 Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hho...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Honza Horak hho...@redhat.com --- (In reply to Matěj Cepl from comment #17) I would suggest CLOSED/WONTFIX. I agree, EPEL guys are already looking into SCL inclusion, or solve it differently using more repos: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/epel-devel/2014-August/010055.html I'd rather suggest to talk to EPEL guys directly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 799650] Review Request: python-django-tagging - A generic tagging application for Django projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799650 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #16 from Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-django-tagging New Branches: epel7 Owners: mrunge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150762] Review Request: python-xcffib - A drop in replacement for xpyb, an XCB python binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150762
Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||admil...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Permissions on files are set properly.
Note: See rpmlint output
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#FilePermissions
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Apache (v2.0), Unknown or generated. 30 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/admiller/1150762-python-
xcffib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xcffib
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/xcffib
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if
[Bug 1150762] Review Request: python-xcffib - A drop in replacement for xpyb, an XCB python binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150762 Adam Miller admil...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|admil...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822283] Review Request: vim-omnicppcomplete - vim c++ completion omnifunc with a ctags database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822283 --- Comment #11 from Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu --- Great! glad to hear from you, looking forward to seeing it. Please let me know if you have any other questions or need anything else. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151072] Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072 Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rku...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rku...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com --- I'll take this for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148816] Review Request: python-XStatic-Bootstrap-Datepicker - Bootstrap-Datepicker (XStatic packaging standard)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148816
Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Haïkel Guémar karlthe...@gmail.com ---
As with all xstatic packages, please request that xstatic upstream keeps
license files in the tarball.
Overall, this package complies with Fedora Packaging guidelines, so I hereby
approve it into Fedora Packages Collection.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
Unknown or generated, *No copyright* Apache (v2.0). 55 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1148816
-python-XStatic-Bootstrap-Datepicker/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
packages/xstatic/pkg
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the
[Bug 1120982] Review Request: scythestat - Scythe Statistical Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120982 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@cicku.me Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #4 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog - Leveled execution logs for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.3.gitda775f0.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.3.gitda775f0.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141864] Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-objx - Go package for dealing with maps, slices, JSON and other data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141864 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-stretchr-objx-0-0.2.gitcbeaeb1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-stretchr-objx-0-0.2.gitcbeaeb1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141872] Review Request: golang-github-stretchr-testify - Tools for testifying that your code will behave as you intend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141872 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.3.gitda775f0.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-stretchr-testify-0-0.3.gitda775f0.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141861] Review Request: golang-github-golang-glog - Leveled execution logs for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141861 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- golang-github-golang-glog-0-0.2.gitd1c4472.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-golang-glog-0-0.2.gitd1c4472.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 248291] Review Request: libXNVCtrl - Library that provides the NV-CONTROL API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=248291 Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC||chat-to...@raveit.de Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #14 from Wolfgang Ulbrich chat-to...@raveit.de --- Package Change Request == Package Name: libXNVCtrl New Branches: epel7 Owners: raveit65 needed to build mate-sensor-applet see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1140374 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129220] Review Request: bash-argsparse - An high level argument parsing library for bash
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129220 --- Comment #10 from Dams an...@livna.org --- Alright, so it need a few more tweaking but I made it build on koji. * The SRPMS with its sha256 : 0a96184f6f0892f43a115a6934bfbedf376fc5d58868b20eb63ef2c214d68f21 http://argsparse.livna.org/bash-argsparse-1.6.1-1.fc20.src.rpm * The spec file : http://argsparse.livna.org/bash-argsparse.spec * The koji build --scratch task : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7815491 Hopefully this will be the end of it :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103554] Review Request: cppcms - a Free High Performance Web Development Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103554 --- Comment #29 from Raphael Groner projects...@smart.ms --- IIRC, we should also ask for an exception to keep booster as it is and embedded: * Exception for using bundled bullet library for supertuxkart - https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/459 (spot, 16:12:03) * ACTION: Permit supertuxkart to include and use its forks of irrlicht and bullet. (+1:5, 0:0, -1:0) (spot, 16:19:28) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151072] Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072 Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Robert Kuska rku...@redhat.com --- Rmplint complies about 'no binary' but the Arch exclusivity is inherited from docker. This looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151072] Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072 Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Matej Stuchlik mstuc...@redhat.com --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fig Short Description: Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker Upstream URL: http://www.fig.sh Owners: mstuchli Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141896] Review Request: cadvisor - Analyzes resource usage and performance characteristics of running containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141896 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158c3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158c3.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141896] Review Request: cadvisor - Analyzes resource usage and performance characteristics of running containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141896 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141896] Review Request: cadvisor - Analyzes resource usage and performance characteristics of running containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141896 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158c3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158c3.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1013807] Review Request: python-sendgrid - SendGrid library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013807 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-10-09 15:29:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1027506] Review Request: python-proboscis - A test framework that extends Python's built-in unit test
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1027506 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-10-09 15:30:42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 947640] Review Request: snappy-player - An open-source Gnome media player
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947640 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-10-09 15:32:06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1002013] Review Request: httpdtap - Tool for querying httpd using SystemTap scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002013 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-10-09 15:33:23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1012169] Review Request: python-llvmmath - LLVM math library in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012169 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co | |m | Assignee|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co |nob...@fedoraproject.org |m | Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1012169] Review Request: python-llvmmath - LLVM math library in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1012169 Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135906] Review Request: ghc-http-date - HTTP Date parser and formatter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135906 Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ghc-http-date-0.0.4-1.fc19 |ghc-http-date-0.0.4-1.el7 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org --- ghc-http-date-0.0.4-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
