[Bug 1149641] Review Request: xcat - A command line tool to explore blind XPath injection vulnerabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149641 Johnny Robeson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joh...@localmomentum.net --- Comment #10 from Johnny Robeson --- shouldn't this package depend on python 3.4 or a python3-asyncio asyncio package? I don't see how it would work out of the box on a fedora 20 install. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148982] Review Request: python-aiohttp - A Python http client/server for asyncio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148982 Johnny Robeson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joh...@localmomentum.net --- Comment #13 from Johnny Robeson --- This package needs a python3-asyncio package to work on fedora 20 as asyncio is only included with python 3.4 (which is not in fedora 20) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051840] Review Request: python-libqutrub - Arabic verb conjuagtion library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051840 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148982] Review Request: python-aiohttp - A Python http client/server for asyncio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148982 --- Comment #14 from Johnny Robeson --- here is the specific error message after installing: $ python3 >>> import aiohttp Traceback (most recent call last): File "", line 1, in File "/usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/aiohttp/__init__.py", line 6, in from .protocol import * File "/usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/aiohttp/protocol.py", line 20, in from aiohttp import errors File "/usr/lib/python3.3/site-packages/aiohttp/errors.py", line 9, in from asyncio import TimeoutError ImportError: No module named 'asyncio' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149641] Review Request: xcat - A command line tool to explore blind XPath injection vulnerabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149641 --- Comment #11 from Johnny Robeson --- sorry. i commented on the wrong package. :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1145443] Review Request: python-pdfkit - Python 2 wrapper for wkhtmltopdf utility to convert HTML to PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145443 --- Comment #11 from William Moreno --- I have added python3 as requires in python3 subpackage. Updated .spec: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-pdfkit.spec Updater .src.rpm: https://williamjmorenor.fedorapeople.org/rpmdev/python-pdfkit-0.4.1-5.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154163] Review Request: libmozjpeg - SIMD-accelerated JPEG codec that provides both the libjpeg and TurboJPEG APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154163 --- Comment #6 from Rahul Sundaram --- fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154163] Review Request: libmozjpeg - SIMD-accelerated JPEG codec that provides both the libjpeg and TurboJPEG APIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154163 Andrea Musuruane changed: What|Removed |Added CC||musur...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane --- Utils package description is wrong. It refers to libjpeg-turbo and not to libmozjpeg. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #10 from Alberto Chiusole --- Hi all, sorry for the absence, I've completely forgotten to review the package after Volker's advice. I've privately talked with Nicolas and I noted down some other recommendations, thank you. I think it's pretty useless to re-write all the code in a way compatible with python3, because the two versions will go ahead living for many years IMHO. And thanks for your direct intervention in the discussion, muflone. I will check those "requires" too (I think I've installed the right deps in my system, so the rpm builder hasn't complained). Now I'm under exams so I've rather no time to spend in fedora or in other fields. Around the first week of november I should have the time to work on it. I'm sorry for the drawback and the lack of time to spend on it, Alberto -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1145443] Review Request: python-pdfkit - Python 2 wrapper for wkhtmltopdf utility to convert HTML to PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145443 Eduardo Echeverria changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|echevemas...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129630] Review Request: riemann-c-client - The riemann C client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129630 --- Comment #14 from Peter Czanik --- The spec file is available at http://peter.czanik.hu/fedora/riemann-c-client.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154165] Review Request: golang-github-docker-libtrust - Library for managing authentication and authorization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154165 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-docker-libtrust-0-0.1.gitd273ef2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-docker-libtrust-0-0.1.gitd273ef2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129630] Review Request: riemann-c-client - The riemann C client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129630 --- Comment #13 from Peter Czanik --- It's available at http://peter.czanik.hu/fedora/riemann-c-client-1.2.1-3.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129630] Review Request: riemann-c-client - The riemann C client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129630 --- Comment #12 from Peter Borsa --- Peter, can you give us a version 3 of this package because I'll review it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1127173] Review Request: liborigin2 - Library for reading OriginLab OPJ project files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1127173 --- Comment #9 from Christian Dersch --- Still working on this, takes a bit longer due to a lack of time :( -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129630] Review Request: riemann-c-client - The riemann C client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129630 Peter Borsa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peter.bo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter.bo...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1152966] Review Request: indi-gphoto - INDI driver for many cameras using gPhoto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152966 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: indi-gphoto Short Description: INDI driver providing support for gPhoto Upstream URL: http://indilib.org/ Owners: lupinix Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1152966] Review Request: indi-gphoto - INDI driver for many cameras using gPhoto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152966 --- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch --- Thank you very much for your review :) I'll inform upstream about the wrong FSF address. Greetings, Christian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1152963] Review Request: indi-eqmod - INDI driver for SkyWatcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152963 --- Comment #4 from Christian Dersch --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: indi-eqmod Short Description: INDI driver providing support for SkyWatcher Protocol Upstream URL: http://indilib.org/ Owners: lupinix Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1152963] Review Request: indi-eqmod - INDI driver for SkyWatcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152963 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch --- Thank you very much for reviewing this package! Greetings Christian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1152966] Review Request: indi-gphoto - INDI driver for many cameras using gPhoto
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152966
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||d...@der-flo.net
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
hi!
Please inform upstream about the incorrect FSF-address in OPYING.LIB
Everything else looks fine :-)
Cheers,
Flo
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
---> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin
[Bug 1152963] Review Request: indi-eqmod - INDI driver for SkyWatcher
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1152963
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||d...@der-flo.net
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: SourceX tarball generation or download is documented.
Note: Package contains tarball without URL, check comments
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
---> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=7910621
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager,
[Bug 1066573] Review Request: taskd - Secure server providing multi-user, multi-client access to task data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066573 Matthew Miller changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mat...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) --- Comment #19 from Matthew Miller --- Christopher, any comments on updated RPM? Is this good to go? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151711] Review Request: liblxqt - Core LXQT library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151711 Eugene A. Pivnev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Last Closed||2014-10-19 10:12:42 --- Comment #10 from Eugene A. Pivnev --- LXQT-0.8.0 released. And it's not compatible with razorqt. Sorry everybody. Will try LXQT-0.8.0 with qt5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151747] Review request: onionshare - share files of any size securely and anonymously
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151747 --- Comment #22 from Robert Mayr --- Updated el6 build to 0.6-7 fixing the name of pyQt4. Probably it needs to be done also for all other builds to be consistent. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154406] New: Review Request: perl-Unicode-CaseFold - Unicode case-folding for case-insensitive lookups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154406 Bug ID: 1154406 Summary: Review Request: perl-Unicode-CaseFold - Unicode case-folding for case-insensitive lookups Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Unicode-CaseFold/perl-Unicode-CaseFold.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Unicode-CaseFold/perl-Unicode-CaseFold-1.00-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: This module provides Unicode case-folding for Perl. Case-folding is a tool that allows a program to make case-insensitive string comparisons or do case- insensitive lookups. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154405] New: Review Request: perl-Struct-Dumb - Make simple lightweight record-like structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154405 Bug ID: 1154405 Summary: Review Request: perl-Struct-Dumb - Make simple lightweight record-like structures Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Struct-Dumb/perl-Struct-Dumb.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Struct-Dumb/perl-Struct-Dumb-0.03-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Struct::Dumb creates record-like structure types, similar to the struct keyword in C, C++ or C#, or Record in Pascal. An invocation of this module will create a construction function which returns new object references with the given field values. These references all respond to lvalue methods that access or modify the values stored. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149423] Review Request: gnurobbo - Port of the once famous ATARI game Robbo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149423 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||gnurobbo-0.66-1.20141005svn ||412.fc20 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- gnurobbo-0.66-1.20141005svn412.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148481] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-exp - Experimental tools and packages for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148481 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-googlecode-go-exp-0- ||0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:24:07 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-go-exp-0-0.1.hgbd8df7009305.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1132008] Review Request: rubygem-openssl_cms - OpenSSL with CMS functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132008 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-openssl_cms-0.0.2-1.20140212git7fea071.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148452] Review Request: golang-github-onsi-gomega - Ginkgo's Preferred Matcher Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148452 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-onsi-gomega-0 ||-0.1.gita0ee4df.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:23:39 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-onsi-gomega-0-0.1.gita0ee4df.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 Bug 1122176 depends on bug 1141896, which changed state. Bug 1141896 Summary: Review Request: cadvisor - Analyzes resource usage and performance characteristics of running containers https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141896 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141896] Review Request: cadvisor - Analyzes resource usage and performance characteristics of running containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141896 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158 ||c3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:23:24 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- cadvisor-0.3.0-0.4.git9d158c3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148705] Review Request: golang-github-jmhodges-levigo - Go wrapper for LevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148705 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-jmhodges-levi ||go-0-0.1.git253793d.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:23:16 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-jmhodges-levigo-0-0.1.git253793d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151415] Review Request: perl-Return-MultiLevel - Return across multiple call levels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151415 Bug 1151415 depends on bug 1149978, which changed state. Bug 1149978 Summary: Review Request: perl-Data-Munge - Utility functions for working with perl data structures and code references https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149978 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149978] Review Request: perl-Data-Munge - Utility functions for working with perl data structures and code references
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149978 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Data-Munge-0.08-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:23:02 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Data-Munge-0.08-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148477] Review Request: golang-googlecode-gomock - Mocking framework for the Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148477 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-googlecode-gomock-0- ||0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:22:24 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-gomock-0-0.1.hge033c7513ca3.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148735] Review Request: golang-googlecode-log4go - Logging package similar to log4j for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148735 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-googlecode-log4go-0- ||0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:22:13 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-log4go-0-0.1.hgc3294304d93f.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149645] Review Request: perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI - Override LWP's HTTP/HTTPS backend with your own PSGI application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149645 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI-0.07 ||-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:22:18 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-LWP-Protocol-PSGI-0.07-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148447] Review Request: golang-github-kr-fs - Provides Go filesystem-related functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148447 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-kr-fs-0-0.1.g ||it2788f0d.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:22:07 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-kr-fs-0-0.1.git2788f0d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148456] Review Request: golang-github-onsi-ginkgo - A Golang BDD Testing Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-onsi-ginkgo-0 ||-0.1.git90d6a47.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:21:49 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-onsi-ginkgo-0-0.1.git90d6a47.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-bmizerany-pat ||-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:21:18 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-bmizerany-pat-0-0.1.gitb8a3500.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148692] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-go-cache - An in-memory key:value store/cache library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148692 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-influxdb-go-c ||ache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:20:53 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-influxdb-go-cache-0-0.1.git7d1d6d6.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150121] Review Request: perl-Module-Build-XSUtil - A Module::Build class for building XS modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150121 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Module-Build-XSUtil-0.14-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148702] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-pat - A Sinatra style pattern muxer for Go's net/http library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148702 Bug 1148702 depends on bug 1148700, which changed state. Bug 1148700 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148700] Review Request: golang-github-bmizerany-assert - Assertions for Go tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148700 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-bmizerany-ass ||ert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:19:26 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-bmizerany-assert-0-0.1.gite17e998.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148460] Review Request: golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema - Package for creating Google Big Query from Go structs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148460 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-SeanDolphin-b ||qschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc ||20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-10-19 09:18:51 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-SeanDolphin-bqschema-0-0.1.gita713d26.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #9 from Muflone Ovinis --- @Alberto Chiusole I've no great experience in Fedora packaging so I'm not entirely sure about this but the spec file contains: Requires:pygtk2 which seems to me a requirements for GTK+ 2.x bindings for Python. Since the version 0.6, gWakeOnLAN was rewritten to use the GTK+ 3 libraries, instead of the GTK+ 2. As you can see in the README [1] file some runtime libraries are required (xdg, GTK+3 gobject for Python). [1] https://github.com/muflone/gwakeonlan/blob/master/README.md -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060419] Review Request: gwakeonlan - A GTK+ utility to awake machines using the Wake on LAN
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060419 --- Comment #8 from Muflone Ovinis --- Hi The software gWakeOnLAN was written around Python 2.x and uses some pieces of code not compatible with Python 3: - print instruction instead of print function - module ConfigParser was renamed in configparser - xrange was renamed in range (and range was removed) - method sendto won't allow the use of strings Apart the external GTK dependencies, some patches are needed in order to allow this software to run with Python 3.x Muflone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060520] Review Request: qm-vamp-plugins - Vamp audio feature extraction plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060520 Martin Milata changed: What|Removed |Added CC||val...@civ.zcu.cz Flags||needinfo?(val...@civ.zcu.cz ||) --- Comment #1 from Martin Milata --- Only found one issue: [1] says that "Packages which explicitly need to link against the static version must BuildRequire: foo-static, so that the usage can be tracked.", however qm-vamp-plugins buildrequire qm-dsp-devel. I guess the spec should be more explicit about linking against static libraries and require qm-dsp-static instead. Otherwise looks good and when mixxx is run with VAMP_PATH=/usr/lib64/vamp/ the options "Tempo and Beat Tracker" appears in the list of beat analysers. I guess this means that the package functions as described:) [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Packaging_Static_Libraries_2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 895149] Review Request: qtchooser - Qt Chooser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=895149 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1154372 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154372 [Bug 1154372] /usr/lib/qtchooser not included -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 742389] Review Request: gtk-unico-engine - Unico Gtk+ theming engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=742389 --- Comment #18 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gtk-unico-engine New Branches: epel7 Owners: raveit65 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
