[Bug 1162484] Review Request: python-unittest2 - The new features in unittest backported to Python 2.4+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162484 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- python-unittest2-0.8.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-unittest2-0.8.0-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162484] Review Request: python-unittest2 - The new features in unittest backported to Python 2.4+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162484 Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||python-unittest2-0.8.0-2.fc ||22 ||python-unittest2-0.8.0-2.fc ||21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151072] Review Request: fig - Punctual, lightweight development environments using Docker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151072 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mstuc...@redhat.com Flags|needinfo?(dridi.boukelmoune |needinfo?(mstuchli@redhat.c |@gmail.com) |om) --- Comment #10 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- (In reply to Matej Stuchlik from comment #9) > Hey Dridi, > f20 doesn't seem to have python-texttable [0], one of the dependencies of > fig. Is this the only missing piece? I can open a bug, hoping that python-texttable isn't itself missing something else in f20. > Are you particularly interested in having fig in f20? Yes! Because I know for a fact that 50% of my laptops won't upgrade immediately to f21 (and by that I mean my $dayjob laptop:) and I need fig on both for different self-contained reasons. > Matt > > [0] https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/python-texttable -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666
Andy Lutomirski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from Andy Lutomirski ---
It looks like parallel-installing the 64-bit and 32-bit versions would be quite
useful. That would mostly involve moving everything to %{_libdir}, possibly
all in a subpackage, and having a separate package with symlinks. The arch
packages should possibly also install an afl-fuzz-64 or afl-fuzz-32 symlink in
%{_bindir}, too. (Feel free to disagree with me here.)
I'm ambivalent about the sed vs make args. I think make args would be nicer
(as noted above).
The source URL is actively problematic. Downloading it right now results in a
tarball that is materially different (docs only, fortunately) from the one in
your SRPM. Can you use a different URL or none at all and ask upstream to
provide usable download links?
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in
the spec URL.
Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/luto/devel/fedora/afl
/american-fuzzy-lop/diff.txt
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are
listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: sed
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/luto/devel/fedora/afl/american-
fuzzy-lop/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/afl
^^^ The package must own %{_libdir}/afl
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/afl
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
^^^ %{optflags} isn't being honored. Something like make CFLAGS="%{optflags}"
could work.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
I think that BR: sed is unnecessary, though.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
It does require it, and it's there.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 686080 bytes in 25 files.
[ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
See notes above
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %m
[Bug 1132356] Review Request: perl-Mo - Micro Objects. Mo is less
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1132356 --- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Mo-0.39-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Mo-0.39-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164078] New: Review Request: twms - Tiny web map service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164078 Bug ID: 1164078 Summary: Review Request: twms - Tiny web map service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: e...@mayorgalinux.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/twms.spec SRPM URL: https://mayorga.fedorapeople.org/twms-0.05-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: tWMS is a tiny WMS server written in Python and using tiles as a backend storage. Fedora Account System Username: mayorga -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@draigbrady.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: subunit New Branches: epel7 Owners: pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 913200] Review Request: python-testrepository - A repository of test results
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913200 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #21 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-testrepository New Branches: epel7 Owners: pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148224] Review Request: mmdb2 - protein coordinate library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148224
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
$ diff -Nu ~/ownCloud/pkg_reviews/mmdb2/rev1/srpm-unpacked/mmdb2.spec
mmdb2.spec
--- /home/mukundan/ownCloud/pkg_reviews/mmdb2/rev1/srpm-unpacked/mmdb2.spec
2014-09-30 20:22:44.0 -0500
+++ mmdb2.spec2014-11-13 20:50:19.0 -0600
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
Summary: Macromolecular coordinate library
Name: mmdb2
Version: 2.0.1
-Release: 1%{?dist}
+Release: 2%{?dist}
License: LGPLv3
Group: System Environment/Libraries
URL: ftp://ftp.ccp4.ac.uk/opensource/
@@ -53,31 +53,28 @@
make %{?_smp_mflags}
%install
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL='install -p'
+make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL='install -p'
# remove unpackaged files from the buildroot
-rm -f $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_libdir}/*.la
+rm -f %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/*.la
%post -p /sbin/ldconfig
%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig
-%clean
-rm -rf %{buildroot}
-
%files
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%doc AUTHORS COPYING README
%{_libdir}/libmmdb2.so.0.0.0
%{_libdir}/libmmdb2.so.0
%files devel
-%defattr(-,root,root,-)
%{_libdir}/libmmdb2.so
%{_includedir}/mmdb2/
%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/%{name}.pc
%changelog
+* Sun Nov 2 2014 Tim Fenn - 2.0.1-2
+- spec file clean ups/modernization
+
* Sun Sep 21 2014 Tim Fenn - 2.0.1-1
- Initial build
Package builds fine in mock. No other issues in review.
Package APPROVED. Cheers, and sorry for the delays.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148224] Review Request: mmdb2 - protein coordinate library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148224 --- Comment #12 from Tim Fenn --- Updated: Spec URL: https://sites.google.com/site/timfenn/mmdb2.spec SRPM URL: https://sites.google.com/site/timfenn/mmdb2-2.0.1-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1145100] Review Request: zeromq2 - Software library for fast, message-based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145100 --- Comment #5 from Robin Lee --- > SRPM URL: http://tomspur.fedorapeople.org/review/zeromq2-2.2.0-12.fc20.src.rpm This URL returns 404. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) --- (In reply to Lubomir Rintel from comment #12) > (In reply to Parag AN(पराग) from comment #11) > > Lubomir, > >First, this package is not following Fonts packaging guidelines. > > Could you please be more specific? > 1) We need to have a fontconfig file. This one only need to cover generic names rule. 2) I think as per guidelines this font need to fix its metadata. There is no license text, neither in source nor in font file itself. There is a example given on the guidelines page on how to do this. Copyright contains license information which looks incorrect and need to be fixed. 3) Incorrect usage of %_font_pkg macro. I have not checked what the package submitter has checked in git yet as there is no approved updated srpm here to verify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161014] Review Request: llvm34 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Jens Petersen --- Thank you Mukundan for taking time to review this carefully and for good suggestions to improve the packaging. :) I see there is an open RFE bug 1127916 for fedora-review to support %license. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: llvm34 Short Description: Low Level Virtual Machine compiler infrastructure Upstream URL: http://llvm.org/ Owners: petersen Branches: InitialCC: If llvm-3.5 is backported to F21 then I will request a f21 branch later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161014] Review Request: llvm34 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Hi Jens, I do not have anything else to complain about! :) Package APPROVED! Cheers! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161014] Review Request: llvm34 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014
--- Comment #15 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: llvm34-doc : /usr/share/doc/llvm34-doc/examples/BrainF/BrainF.h
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages
---> Already discussed. No problems.
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find LICENSE.TXT in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
---> This is a fedora-review problem. %license macro is not implemented
everywhere yet.
License is installed in /usr/share/license/llvm-libs
FPC ticket 411.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"BSD (3 clause)", "ISC", "Unknown or generated". 2381 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mukundan/ownCloud/pkg_reviews/llvm34/1161014-llvm34/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses
---> This is provided by filesystem in rawhide.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/llvm34,
/usr/share/licenses
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
---> -O3 flag removed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 686080 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: Static libraries in -static or -devel subpackage, providing -devel if
present.
Note: Package has .a files: llvm34-static.
[x]: F
[Bug 1159601] Review Request: php-twig-extensions - Twig extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-twig-extensions-1.2.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1091483] Review Request: python-pyprintr - Module that allows to emulate the print_r() PHP function
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1091483 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-pyprintr-1.0-3.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-13 19:16:00 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyprintr-1.0-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123654] Review Request: smemstat - Shared memory usage monitoring tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123654 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||smemstat-0.01.10-2.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-13 19:15:43 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- smemstat-0.01.10-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #25 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- (In reply to Itamar Reis Peixoto from comment #24) > any news about this ? Will hopefully be done before Saturday. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157908] Review Request: calamares - Installer from a live CD/DVD/USB to disk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157908 Kevin Kofler changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Kevin Kofler --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: calamares Short Description: Installer from a live CD/DVD/USB to disk Upstream URL: http://calamares.github.io/ Owners: kkofler Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123169] Review Request: nodejs-linify - Transform a file's line endings from \r\n to \n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123169 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123169] Review Request: nodejs-linify - Transform a file's line endings from \r\n to \n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123169 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123169] Review Request: nodejs-linify - Transform a file's line endings from \r\n to \n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123169 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #24 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- any news about this ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160857] Review Request: websocketpp - C++ WebSocket Protocol Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160857
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||d...@der-flo.net
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated",
"zlib/libpng". 18 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/cmake(cmake)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
---> Patch is justified
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
---> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8133376
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that
[Bug 1123169] Review Request: nodejs-linify - Transform a file's line endings from \r\n to \n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123169 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-linify-1.0.1-4.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123169] Review Request: nodejs-linify - Transform a file's line endings from \r\n to \n
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162217] Review Request: perl-Test-CleanNamespaces - Check for uncleaned imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162217 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162217] Review Request: perl-Test-CleanNamespaces - Check for uncleaned imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162217 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162217] Review Request: perl-Test-CleanNamespaces - Check for uncleaned imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162217 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162217] Review Request: perl-Test-CleanNamespaces - Check for uncleaned imports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162217 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-CleanNamespaces-0.16-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160857] Review Request: websocketpp - C++ WebSocket Protocol Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160857 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/websocketpp/websocketpp.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/websocketpp/websocketpp-0.4.0-2.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Thu Nov 13 2014 Rex Dieter 0.4.0-2 - use (upstreamable) cmake_noarch.patch instead of manually moving files around -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/labiryntowy-fonts-1.53-1.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter --- APPROVED, items were fixed in comment #2 resetting fedora-cvs (sorry): New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lxqt-about Short Description: about dialog of lxqt desktop suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- once more with feeling New Package SCM Request === Package Name: liblxqt-mount Short Description: Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163969] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163969 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2014-11-13 15:00:36 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1158625 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: lxqt-mount |Review Request: |- Mount library utility for |liblxqt-mount - Mount |LXQt desktop Suite |library utility for LXQt ||desktop Suite Alias|lxqt-mount |liblxqt-mount -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Helio Chissini de Castro changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: lxqt-about |liblxqt-about - about |- about dialog of lxqt |dialog of lxqt desktop |desktop suite |suite | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||he...@kde.org --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter --- *** Bug 1163969 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: liblxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Helio Chissini de Castro changed: What|Removed |Added CC||he...@kde.org Summary|Review Request: lxqt-about |Review Request: |- about dialog of lxqt |liblxqt-about - about |desktop suite |dialog of lxqt desktop ||suite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163969] New: Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163969 Bug ID: 1163969 Summary: Review Request: liblxqt-mount - Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: he...@kde.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/lxqt/liblxqt-mount.spec SRPM URL: https://heliocastro.fedorapeople.org/lxqt/liblxqt-mount-0.8.0-3.fc21.src.rpm Description: Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite Fedora Account System Username: heliocastro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811769] Review Request: python-tw2-dynforms - Dynamic forms for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811769 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811769] Review Request: python-tw2-dynforms - Dynamic forms for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811769 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159882] Review Request: lxqt-config - Config tools for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159882 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159882] Review Request: lxqt-config - Config tools for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159882 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159877] Review Request: lxqt-powermanagement - Powermanagement daemon for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159877 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159874] Review Request: lxqt-policykit - PolicyKit agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159874 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159877] Review Request: lxqt-powermanagement - Powermanagement daemon for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159877 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159874] Review Request: lxqt-policykit - PolicyKit agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159874 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159873] Review Request: lxqt-panel - Main panel bar for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159873 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159841] Review Request: lxqt-runner - Application runner agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159841 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159841] Review Request: lxqt-runner - Application runner agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159841 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- WARNING: fedora-review flag not set to '+' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158999] lxqt-session - Main session for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158999 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158999] lxqt-session - Main session for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158999 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158996] Review Request: lxqt-qtplugin - Qt plugin framework for LXQt Desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158996 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811769] Review Request: python-tw2-dynforms - Dynamic forms for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811769 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-tw2-dynforms New Branches: epel7 Owners: ralph InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158996] Review Request: lxqt-qtplugin - Qt plugin framework for LXQt Desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158996 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158632] Review Request: lxqt-common - Common resources for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158632 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158632] Review Request: lxqt-common - Common resources for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158632 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: lxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: lxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- WARNING: Requested package name liblxqt-mount doesn't match bug summary lxqt-mount -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811782] Review Request: python-tw2-sqla - SQLAlchemy database layer for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811782 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811782] Review Request: python-tw2-sqla - SQLAlchemy database layer for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811782 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146662] Review Request: java-libpst - A pure Java library for the reading of Outlook PST and OST files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146662 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Upstream didn't respond, so please, i install LGPLv3 license text and you'll continue with the review, if there aren't objections. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 811782] Review Request: python-tw2-sqla - SQLAlchemy database layer for ToscaWidgets2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=811782 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-tw2-sqla New Branches: epel7 Owners: ralph InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159601] Review Request: php-twig-extensions - Twig extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159601 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159601] Review Request: php-twig-extensions - Twig extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159601 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-twig-extensions-1.2.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-twig-extensions-1.2.0-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159601] Review Request: php-twig-extensions - Twig extensions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159601 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-twig-extensions-1.2.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-twig-extensions-1.2.0-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151415] Review Request: perl-Return-MultiLevel - Return across multiple call levels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151415 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.04 |perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.04 |-1.fc21 |-1.fc20 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.04-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149641] Review Request: xcat - A command line tool to explore blind XPath injection vulnerabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|xcat-0.7.1-1.fc20 |xcat-0.7.1-1.fc21 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- xcat-0.7.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148982] Review Request: python-aiohttp - A Python http client/server for asyncio
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148982 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|python-aiohttp-0.9.1-2.fc21 |python-aiohttp-0.9.1-2.fc20 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-aiohttp-0.9.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149641] Review Request: xcat - A command line tool to explore blind XPath injection vulnerabilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149641 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||xcat-0.7.1-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-13 13:17:47 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- xcat-0.7.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151815] Review Request: nodejs-nomnom - Nodejs option parser with generated usage and commands
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151815 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-nomnom-1.8.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144664] Review Request: nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client - Npm registry client that doesn't spam stdout/stderr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144664 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |client-0.0.1-1.fc20 |client-0.0.1-1.fc21 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client-0.0.1-1.fc21, nodejs-xtend-4.0.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158670] Review Request: golang-github-Sirupsen-logrus - Structured logger for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158670 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-Sirupsen-logrus-0.5.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151415] Review Request: perl-Return-MultiLevel - Return across multiple call levels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151415 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.04 ||-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-13 13:11:12 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Return-MultiLevel-0.04-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158080] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-ringphp - Simple handler system used to power clients and servers in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158080 --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- Updated to 1.0.3 COPR build: http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/siwinski/php-experimental/build/59377/ Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/83fce19b792f9c35d1c7391b9249394e2fd0507e/php-guzzlehttp-ringphp.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/copr/php-experimental/php-guzzlehttp-ringphp-1.0.3-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159841] Review Request: lxqt-runner - Application runner agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159841 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159882] Review Request: lxqt-config - Config tools for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159882 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159874] Review Request: lxqt-policykit - PolicyKit agent for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159874 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159877] Review Request: lxqt-powermanagement - Powermanagement daemon for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159877 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159873] Review Request: lxqt-panel - Main panel bar for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159873 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158999] lxqt-session - Main session for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158999 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lxqt-session Short Description: Main session for LXQt desktop suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159819] Review Request: lxqt-about - about dialog of lxqt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159819 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lxqt-about Short Description: about dialog of lxqt desktop suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158996] Review Request: lxqt-qtplugin - Qt plugin framework for LXQt Desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158996 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lxqt-qtplugin Short Description: Qt plugin framework for LXQt Desktop Suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158632] Review Request: lxqt-common - Common resources for LXQt desktop suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158632 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: lxqt-common Short Description: Common resources for LXQt desktop suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158625] Review Request: lxqt-mount - Mount library utility for LXQt desktop Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158625 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: liblxqt-mount Short Description: Mount utility library for LXQt Desktop Suite Upstream URL: http://lxqt.org/ Owners: heliocastro rdieter tieugene Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: heliocastro -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157908] Review Request: calamares - Installer from a live CD/DVD/USB to disk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157908 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Kofler --- As for the length of the release tags, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages allows up to 13 characters for the commit ID, and I'm using exactly 13. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
