[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #14 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop-0.47b-1.fc21.src.rpm * Sat Nov 15 2014 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.47b-1 - New upstream version 0.47b. - Use stable Source URL. - Remove parallel fix which is now upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144803] Review Request: globus-xio-udt-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO UDT Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144803 --- Comment #1 from Mattias Ellert --- New version; Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-xio-udt-driver.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413 --- Comment #17 from Christopher Meng --- (In reply to Jeff Peeler from comment #16) > I was looking for this in Fedora and came across this review. Could the spec > files be re-uploaded once more? (Not fully committed here yet, but I am > interested in helping this along.) Yes, I'd like to finish this one ASAP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854237] Review Request: jcsp - Communicating Sequential Processes for Java (JCSP)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854237 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159976] Review Request: extra166y - Concurrency JSR-166 - Collections supporting parallel operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159976 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1123511] Review Request: nanomsg - A fast, scalable, and easy to use socket library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511 Japheth Cleaver changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(cleaver-redhat@te | |rabithia.org) | --- Comment #8 from Japheth Cleaver --- Hello. I was actually waiting on the 0.5 beta release, which just dropped today. Aside from the upstream fixes, there's no specific change here. SONAME was bumped to libnanomsg.so.0.2.1, with pkgconfig at 2.1.2 (per upstream nn.h generation). I'd considered moving -doc back into the main package, but with the recent emphasis on pruning down size as much as humanly possible I suppose this is a decent future-proof for those cloud use cases. I have not had a chance to do any other package reviews myself, unfortunately, but am certainly willing to look out for them. I've updated the versions at: http://terabithia.org/rpms/misc/f20/nanomsg-0.5-0.1.beta.fc20.src.rpm http://terabithia.org/rpms/misc/f20/nanomsg.spec Koji build logs: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8148256 Fedora20: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8148325 EPEL7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8148332 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #10 from Ivan Romanov --- I rebuild qca for F21 x68_64 in mock. But can't reproduce FileWatcher failing unittest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #9 from Ivan Romanov --- Need to gnupg to BR. It is used in tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147149] Review Request: python-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147149 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- python-cryptography-vectors-0.6.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cryptography-vectors-0.6.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147149] Review Request: python-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147149 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-cryptography-vectors-0.6.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-cryptography-vectors-0.6.1-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114267] Review Request: python-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114267 --- Comment #24 from Matěj Cepl --- (In reply to Tomas Mraz from comment #23) > Matěj, could you please update python-cryptography-vectors to the current > upstream version, so the build testsuite can pass? Reopened bug 1147149 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114267] Review Request: python-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114267 Bug 1114267 depends on bug 1147149, which changed state. Bug 1147149 Summary: Review Request: python-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147149 What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147149] Review Request: python-cryptography-vectors - Test vectors for the cryptography package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147149 Matěj Cepl changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #17 from Matěj Cepl --- Reopen for the upgrade required in bug 1114267 comment 23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- python-fixtures-0.3.14-3.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-fixtures-0.3.14-3.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162234] Request review: nss-securepass - NSS library for SecurePass.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162234 --- Comment #3 from Giuseppe Paterno' --- Updated the package at 0.2 UID lookup fixed in sources Buildroot macro have been used instead of $RPM_BUILD_ROOT New SRPM here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6937/8146937/nss-securepass-0.2-1.src.rpm Spec file location is unchanged -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1005718] Review Request: faience-icon-theme - Faience icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005718 Wolfgang Ulbrich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|ERRATA |--- Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #30 from Wolfgang Ulbrich --- Package Change Request == Package Name: faience-icon-theme New Branches: epel7 Owners: raveit65 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150512] Review Request: gr-fcdproplus - GNURadio support for FUNcube Dongle Pro+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150512 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- gr-fcdproplus-0-0.6.20140920git1edbe523.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gr-fcdproplus-0-0.6.20140920git1edbe523.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158065] Review Request: golang-github-stathat-go - Go package for reporting stat counts and values to StatHat
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158065 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-stathat-go-0- ||0.1.git01d012b.el6 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-14 15:28:30 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-stathat-go-0-0.1.git01d012b.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 785312] Review Request: e3 - Text editor with key bindings similar to WordStar, Emacs, pico, nedit, or vi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=785312 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|e3-2.8-3.fc18 |e3-2.8-6.el7 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- e3-2.8-6.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144665] Review Request: nodejs-xtend - Extend like a boss
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144665 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-xtend-4.0.0-2.el7|nodejs-xtend-4.0.0-2.1.el6 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-xtend-4.0.0-2.1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146929] Review Request: ansible-inventory-grapher - Creates graphs representing ansible inventory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146929 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ansible-inventory-grapher-1 |ansible-inventory-grapher-1 |.0.1-2.el6 |.0.1-2.el7 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- ansible-inventory-grapher-1.0.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142051] Review Request: nodejs-xmldom - A W3C Standard XML DOM implementation and parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142051 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-xmldom-0.1.19-1.el7 |nodejs-xmldom-0.1.19-1.1.el ||6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-xmldom-0.1.19-1.1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164378] New: Review Request: pulse - Open Source Continuous File Synchronization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164378 Bug ID: 1164378 Summary: Review Request: pulse - Open Source Continuous File Synchronization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: javier.wil...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://axioma.guegue.com/rpms/pulse/pulse.spec SRPM URL: http://axioma.guegue.com/rpms/pulse/pulse-0.10.5-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Pulse (previously Syncthing) replaces proprietary sync and cloud services with something open, trustworthy and distributed. Your data is your data alone and you deserve to choose where it is stored, if it is shared with some third party, and how it's transmitted over the Internet. Fedora Account System Username: axioma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146928] Review Request: ansible-lint - Best practices checker for Ansible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.el6|ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.el7 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144660] Review Request: nodejs-strscanner - Lexical string analysis for javascript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144660 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-strscanner-0.0.8-2.f |nodejs-strscanner-0.0.8-2.e |c19 |l7 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-strscanner-0.0.8-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146929] Review Request: ansible-inventory-grapher - Creates graphs representing ansible inventory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146929 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ansible-inventory-grapher-1 |ansible-inventory-grapher-1 |.0.1-2.fc21 |.0.1-2.el6 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- ansible-inventory-grapher-1.0.1-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 771123] Review Request: fex - Field split/extraction like cut/awk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771123 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fex-1.20100416.2814-2.el6 |fex-1.20100416.2814-7.el7 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- fex-1.20100416.2814-7.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144661] Review Request: nodejs-node-print - Printf in JavaScript Node.js module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144661 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-node-print-0.0.4-2.e |nodejs-node-print-0.0.4-2.1 |l7 |.el6 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-node-print-0.0.4-2.1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146928] Review Request: ansible-lint - Best practices checker for Ansible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146928 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.fc19 |ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.el6 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- ansible-lint-1.0.4-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144664] Review Request: nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client - Npm registry client that doesn't spam stdout/stderr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144664 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |client-0.0.1-1.el7 |client-0.0.1-1.el6 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client-0.0.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015867] Review Request: conky-manager - Conky scripts manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||conky-manager-2.3.1-1.el7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-14 15:23:57 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- conky-manager-2.3.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1158109] Review Request: xfce4-hamster-plugin - Clone of the gnome extension for xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1158109 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.5-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xfce4-hamster-plugin-1.5-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157273] Review Request: conky-manager-deluxepack - Deluxe Conky Manager Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157273 Bug 1157273 depends on bug 1015867, which changed state. Bug 1015867 Summary: Review Request: conky-manager - Conky scripts manager https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015867 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1051840] Review Request: python-libqutrub - Arabic verb conjuagtion library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051840 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-libqutrub-1.0-3.el7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-14 15:23:43 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-libqutrub-1.0-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1047788] Review Request: python-naftawayh - Arabic word tagger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047788 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-naftawayh-0.2-4.el7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2014-11-14 15:23:36 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- python-naftawayh-0.2-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144664] Review Request: nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client - Npm registry client that doesn't spam stdout/stderr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144664 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |nodejs-silent-npm-registry- |client-0.0.1-1.fc21 |client-0.0.1-1.el7 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-silent-npm-registry-client-0.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142049] Review Request: nodejs-chainsaw - Build chainable fluent interfaces the easy way
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142049 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|nodejs-chainsaw-0.1.0-1.el7 |nodejs-chainsaw-0.1.0-1.1.e ||l6 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-chainsaw-0.1.0-1.1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1146961] Review Request: libsysstat - Library to query system info and statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1146961 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libsysstat-0.1.0-1.fc21 |libsysstat-0.2.0-1.el7 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- libsysstat-0.2.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- Considering we will likely be adding qt5 support in the near future, using a Qt agnostic dir makes sense. I'll switch that in the next pkg iteration (but won't update the review *just* for that. As far as the failed test, good question, maybe the mock/koji environment is different somehow. You should be able to reproduce it in mock yourself, then run 'mock shell' to entire into the buildroot for more investigation if needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 --- Comment #24 from nucleo --- Help with fixing compilation error needed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1050744] Review Request: belle-sip - Linphone SIP stack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1050744 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tcall...@redhat.com --- Comment #23 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Status check here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #13 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8144827 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155829] Review Request: openvas-gsa - Greenbone Security Assistant (GSA) is GUI to the OpenVAS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155829 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||openvas-gsa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #12 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Spec URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop.spec SRPM URL: http://oirase.annexia.org/reviews/afl/american-fuzzy-lop-0.46b-1.fc21.src.rpm * Fri Nov 14 2014 Richard W.M. Jones - 0.46b-1 - New upstream version 0.46b. - Ditch USE_64BIT/CONF_64BIT. - Package now owns afl_helper_path. - Parallel builds now work, and make uses _smp_mflags. - Uses CFLAGS optflags. - Include (some) experimental scripts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348
--- Comment #7 from Ivan Romanov ---
Maybe should use %{_docdir} instead of %{_qt4_docdir}? Or there are reasons to
use %{_qt4_docdir}?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #6 from Ivan Romanov --- #The following tests FAILED: # 8 - FileWatch (Failed) How I can reproduce this? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca-2.1.0-2.fc20.src.rpm %changelog * Fri Nov 14 2014 Rex Dieter 2.1.0-2 - -botan, -doc subpkgs, and READMEs to plugin subpkgs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #11 from Richard W.M. Jones --- Michal has done some great stuff for us in 0.46b. From his email to me: So, in afl 0.46b: - Added support for DESTDIR, - make -j nnn should work fine, - The whole USE_64BIT thing is gone, and the tool should just honor -m32 / -m64 directives when building code. I will package that new version up later, plus the experimental scripts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 928576] Review Request: iris-kadu - A library for working with the XMPP/Jabber protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928576 Ivan Romanov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr...@land.ru --- Comment #9 from Ivan Romanov --- Fedora allready has jdns/qjdns package. No need to use bundled version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Ivan Romanov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Ivan Romanov changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|928937 (qt-reviews) | --- Comment #4 from Ivan Romanov --- Please add documentation and botan plugins subpackages. Use make doc to build documentation. Seems I didn't do install target for docs. So I must be copied to installation folder. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- Fyi, qca can now support Qt5 too, but I chose to not include that yet, in order to keep the review simpler. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164357] New: Review Request: rubygem-scrub_rb - Pure-ruby polyfill of MRI 2.1 String#scrub
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164357 Bug ID: 1164357 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-scrub_rb - Pure-ruby polyfill of MRI 2.1 String#scrub Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mtas...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-scrub_rb.spec SRPM URL: https://mtasaka.fedorapeople.org/Review_request/gem-related/rubygem-scrub_rb-1.0.1-1.fc.src.rpm Description: This gem provides a pure-ruby implementation of `String#scrub` and `#scrub!`, monkey-patched into String, that should work on any ruby platform. Fedora Account System Username: mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||512000 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=512000 [Bug 512000] rename qca2 -> qca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||qca --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- This is a update and rename of existing qca2 package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dr...@land.ru --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- *** Bug 1161767 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164348] New: Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164348 Bug ID: 1164348 Summary: Review Request: qca - Qt Cryptographic Architecture Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/qca/qca-2.1.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Qt Cryptographic Architecture Fedora Account System Username: rdieter Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8143408 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143 --- Comment #12 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-testscenarios New Branches: epel7 Owners: mrunge pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 964143] Review Request: python-testscenarios - Testscenarios, a pyunit extension for dependency injection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964143 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added CC||p...@draigbrady.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #11 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-fixtures New Branches: epel7 Owners: mrunge pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164333] New: Review Request: python-invoke - A Python task execution tool and library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164333 Bug ID: 1164333 Summary: Review Request: python-invoke - A Python task execution tool and library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: athma...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-invoke.spec SRPM URL: https://athmane.fedorapeople.org/pkgs/python-invoke-0.9.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Invoke is a Python (2.6+ and 3.2+) task execution tool and library, drawing inspiration from various sources to arrive at a powerful and clean feature set. Fedora Account System Username: athmane -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 --- Comment #20 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 --- Comment #21 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163666] Review Request: american-fuzzy-lop - Practical, instrumentation-driven fuzzer for binary formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163666 --- Comment #10 from David Tardon --- Could you include the experimental scripts in the package? Or at least those that seem useful, like minimization_script, crash_triage, distributed_fuzzing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1162148] Review Request: labiryntowy-fonts - Conscript (artifical font) letters consist of vertical and horizontal bars. No matter their thickness.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162148
--- Comment #24 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
1) Right its optional but I recommend to have fontconfig files for fonts.
Though this font is not covering any non CGL languages (only Latin) so it can
be optional but I will say add generic names rule file. You can use this font
style as fantasy in fontconfig.
2) Just by looking into this line
%{_font_pkg} %{_fontdir}
one can easily say its going to give duplicate dir installation warning.
Let's check on koji for this and I can see in build.log this
warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/fonts/labiryntowy
recommended way is
%_font_pkg *.ttf -f %{fontconf}
3) Marwin,
I observed either something is broken in this packaged font or in ttname
package itself. But I have ran ttname on some fonts in fedora and it worked
well. It helped to fix copyright as well as license metadata in font files but
for this font its failing. Maybe you want to report this to upstream and get
the font metadata fixed as given in fonts guidelines.
Also, When you do Ctrl+Shift+f in fontforge and click on "TTF names" in left
side, you will see on right side there is no license or license url field so
indeed that information is missing.
Check this ->
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:FontsPolicy#Correcting_the_metadata_with_ttname
4) I have recently added appdata metainfo file to many fonts packages in F21
and F22. This package also need to add metainfo file. I know this is not again
in Guidelines but Richard Hughes wants this. See
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203394.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163440] Review Request: plasma-oxygen - KDE and Qt widget style and window decorations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163440
--- Comment #6 from Kevin Kofler ---
And you actually need to "Obsoletes: plasma-oxygen-kde4 < 5.1.1-2",
because you shipped a plasma-oxygen-kde4-5.1.1-1%{?dist}.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160496] Review Request: flask-dropbox - package for add flask at dropbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160496 --- Comment #3 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Franko, can you update the links? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 --- Comment #28 from James Wilson Harshaw IV --- SPEC : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pYRhIhuHiqTkdzb2dTc1V3d1E/view?usp=sharing SRPM : https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B9pYRhIhuHiqbW9BTlNibE5aY0k/view?usp=sharing Sorry for the google drive location, will be setting up fedora hosted. Build tested, functionality remains intact after modifications. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163440] Review Request: plasma-oxygen - KDE and Qt widget style and window decorations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163440 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler --- The Obsoletes are still wrong. Why "Obsoletes: plasma-oxygen-kde4 < 5.1.1-1" in oxygen-cursor-themes and oxygen-sound-theme? This should be in qt4-style-oxygen instead of (or in addition to if you had shipped both names at some point in the past) your "Obsoletes: oxygen-plasma-kde4". oxygen-cursor-themes and oxygen-sound-theme should have "Obsoletes: plasma-oxygen-common < 5.1.1-1" instead, as they had in the first version of the specfile (but without the "5.1.1." typo ;-) ). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164176] Review Request: golang-github-vishvananda-netlink - Simple netlink library for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164176 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||l...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164152] Review Request: golang-github-emicklei-go-restful - Package for building REST-style Web Services using Google Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164152 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||l...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164170] Review Request: golang-github-vishvananda-netns - Simple network namespace handling for go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164170 Lokesh Mandvekar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||l...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #19 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: subunit New Branches: epel7 Owners: jjames pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 876645] Review Request: python-fixtures - Fixtures, reusable state for writing clean tests and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=876645 Pádraig Brady changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #20 from Pádraig Brady --- Package Change Request == Package Name: python-fixtures New Branches: epel7 Owners: pbrady apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114267] Review Request: python-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114267 --- Comment #23 from Tomas Mraz --- Matěj, could you please update python-cryptography-vectors to the current upstream version, so the build testsuite can pass? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 --- Comment #18 from Jerry James --- Sure, that's fine by me. If you guys want to comaintain the Fedora branches, too, that would also be fine by me. :-) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114267] Review Request: python-cryptography - PyCA's cryptography library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114267 --- Comment #22 from Terry Chia --- I think Matěj got all his concerns addressed upstream. The SRPM he uploaded looks good to me as well. If Matěj is willing to be the primary maintainer of the package I'd prefer he take up the role because he probably has much more experience with RPM packaging than me. My schedule is also pretty much unstable for the foreseeable future so me not being the primary maintainer probably means more timely updates to the RPM when upstream releases happen. I can help him coordinate with the other upstream developers on problems if necessary but we respond pretty fast to GitHub issues anyway so I don't think that's a major issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160857] Review Request: websocketpp - C++ WebSocket Protocol Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160857 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160857] Review Request: websocketpp - C++ WebSocket Protocol Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160857 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163816] Review Request: sonar-runner - Default launcher to analyze a project with SonarQube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163816 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- I have a doubt about this artifact mvn(org.codehaus.sonar-plugins:sonar-runner:zip:) is it really necessary? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163816] Review Request: sonar-runner - Default launcher to analyze a project with SonarQube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163816 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- NON blockin issues: [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. Please, ask to upstream to include copy of LGPL license text. Temporarily, install license file from https://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl.txt [!]: Latest version is packaged. (see above) Fix before import APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1145100] Review Request: zeromq2 - Software library for fast, message-based applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1145100 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-11-14 08:41:24 --- Comment #11 from Thomas Spura --- Building in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8142278 Will wait for the imports into other branches, when the exact transition of the depending packages is clear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163816] Review Request: sonar-runner - Default launcher to analyze a project with SonarQube
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163816
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"LGPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 9 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1163816-sonar-
runner/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/java/sonar, /usr/share/maven-metadata,
/usr/share/maven-poms/sonar
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/java/sonar, /usr/share
/maven-poms/sonar, /usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in sonar-
runner-javadoc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean secti
[Bug 1163440] Review Request: plasma-oxygen - KDE and Qt widget style and window decorations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163440 --- Comment #4 from Dan Vrátil --- Spec URL: https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/plasma-oxygen.spec SRPM URL: https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/plasma-oxygen-5.1.1-6.fc20.src.rpm Thanks for the comments. - fixed the Obsoletes/Conflicts issue (hopefully) - created empty %files section for main package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164257] New: Review Request: efl - Enlightenment Fundament Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164257 Bug ID: 1164257 Summary: Review Request: efl - Enlightenment Fundament Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: serein...@online.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://sereinit.fedorapeople.org/review/efl.spec SRPM URL: https://sereinit.fedorapeople.org/review/efl-1.12.0-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: EFL is a collection of libraries for handling many common task a developer may have such as data structures, communication, rendering, widgets and more. There are many components inside EFL. They also build various things like shared libraries, loadable plug-in modules and also binary executables. Copr repo: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/sereinit/E19/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 854237] Review Request: jcsp - Communicating Sequential Processes for Java (JCSP)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=854237 --- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo --- Package Change Request == Package Name: jcsp New Branches: f20 Owners: gil InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159976] Review Request: extra166y - Concurrency JSR-166 - Collections supporting parallel operations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159976 --- Comment #11 from gil cattaneo --- Package Change Request == Package Name: extra166y New Branches: f20 Owners: gil InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163814] Review Request: sonar - An open platform to manage code quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163814 --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- Found NON blocking issues: please, install COPYING copyright.txt files and change license tag in LGPLv3 (see attachment 957579). Fix before import APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163814] Review Request: sonar - An open platform to manage code quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163814 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Created attachment 957579 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=957579&action=edit licensecheck.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159315] Review Request: multiverse - A software transactional memory implementation for the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159315 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- multiverse-0.7.0-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/multiverse-0.7.0-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1159315] Review Request: multiverse - A software transactional memory implementation for the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159315 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1163814] Review Request: sonar - An open platform to manage code quality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1163814
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
Please install COPYING copyright.txt files
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v2 or
later)", "Unknown or generated". 1051 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/gil/1163814-sonar/licensecheck.txt
Please, change license tag in LGPLv3
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/maven-metadata, /usr/share/maven-
poms/sonar
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/maven-poms/sonar,
/usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[!]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[?]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]:
[Bug 1065539] Review Request: subunit - C bindings for subunit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065539 --- Comment #17 from Pádraig Brady --- Oops I should have added primary maintainers to Owners field anyway. Will do on next request. Jerry we need this for OpenStack testing on EL7. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160857] Review Request: websocketpp - C++ WebSocket Protocol Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160857 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter --- Thanks. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: websocketpp Short Description: C++ WebSocket Protocol Library Upstream URL: http://www.zaphoyd.com/websocketpp Owners: rdieter Branches: f19 f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161014] Review Request: llvm34 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161014] Review Request: llvm34 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161014 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
