[Bug 1169793] Review Request: libstemmer - C stemming algorithm library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169793 Marek Skalický changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2014-12-05 02:18:20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169966] Review Request: rocket - CLI for running app containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #13 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- (In reply to Timothy St. Clair from comment #12) > As I had mentioned: > > An important point to clarify is that two things were announced: > > 1. a spec (App Container) > https://github.com/coreos/rocket/blob/master/app-container/SPEC.md > 2. and an implementation (Rocket). > > Meaning, there may well be several implementations to the spec. Yup, comment from upstream author: - The coreos rootfs is by no means a hard requirement of rocket - we intend for stage1 and stage0 to be decoupled and modular. However, there's a fairly close relationship between the stage1 init binary and the stage1 rootfs, so if you want to change the latter, you have two options: - Replace it with something that's still compatible with the existing stage1 init binary. This will probably be fairly plausible with something Fedora-based, as long as the systemd is relatively recent (this is basically the main thing we use, as you can see in the mkrootfs.sh) - Roll your own init binary as well as rootfs. In this case, you are free to use whatever you like in both, as long as you can continue to work with the output that the stage0 generates, and then comply with the ACE spec - Origin: https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/173#issuecomment-65739099 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151818] Review Request: nodejs-typeahead.js - Autocomplete library for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151818 Dan Callaghan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Dan Callaghan --- Built in rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=597159 Will build for F21 and EPEL7 once dependencies are pushed to stable. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170529] Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local repositories of Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529 --- Comment #5 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Only three items need fixing (see [!]) - license should be GPLv2 and GPLv2+ and MIT, with a comment describing what files are not under GPLv2 (see attachment) - try and enable at least some of the tests - or maybe create a %check section with a comment showing how to invoke the tests but document which missing dependencies are preventing us from running them - try and adjust Makefile (or call make with the appropriate argument) so that install is called with -p to preserve timestamps The latter two are not mandatory though (but the latter might cause Also, this rpmlint warning: - sftp.py in docs should not have executable permission -- it's missing shebangs and doesn't have an if __name__ == '__main__' section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170529] Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local repositories of Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529
--- Comment #4 from Michel Alexandre Salim ---
Created attachment 965001
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=965001&action=edit
License check result
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2)", "Unknown or
generated", "*No copyright* Public domain". 84 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/michel/sources/fedora/reviews/1170529-reprepro/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 430080 bytes in 28 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[?]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Upstream sources contain tests/test.sh but between missing dependencies
and
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
install is called without -p
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from
[Bug 1170529] Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local repositories of Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529 --- Comment #3 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Any idea where the testtool referenced in tests/test.sh comes from? I'm going through my review checklist and am about to suggest enabling at least some of the available tests, but hits a snag there. Checking the package's list of Debian dependencies don't really reveal anything informative either. We can skip that for now I suppose. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170529] Review Request: reprepro - Tool to handle local repositories of Debian packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170529 Michel Alexandre Salim changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mic...@michel-slm.name Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mic...@michel-slm.name Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim --- Taking this review -- could you review this in return? Thanks beforehand! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170875] New: Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170875 Bug ID: 1170875 Summary: Review Request: budgie-desktop - An elegant desktop with GNOME integration Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mic...@michel-slm.name QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop.spec SRPM URL: https://salimma.fedorapeople.org/specs/desktop/budgie-desktop-8-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Budgie is the flagship desktop of the Evolve OS Linux Distribution, and is an Evolve OS project. Designed with the modern user in mind, it focuses on simplicity and elegance. The Budgie Desktop tightly integrates with the GNOME stack, employing underlying technologies to offer an alternative desktop experience. In the spirit of open source, the project is compatible with and available for other Linux distributions. Fedora Account System Username: salimma COPR repo: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/salimma/budgie-desktop/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169966] Review Request: rocket - CLI for running app containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #12 from Timothy St. Clair --- As I had mentioned: An important point to clarify is that two things were announced: 1. a spec (App Container) https://github.com/coreos/rocket/blob/master/app-container/SPEC.md 2. and an implementation (Rocket). Meaning, there may well be several implementations to the spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1167478] Review Request: python-pysb - Rule-based modeling of biochemical systems as Python programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167478 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Just noticed that I had left the review incomplete here (copy/paste snafu). (In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #3) > Python: > [ ]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. > [ ]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should > provide egg info. > [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python > [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel > [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep This should be Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep With the updated spec and srpm, I have no further issues. Package APPROVED! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 459934] Review Request: perl-DateTime-Format-Pg - Parse and format PostgreSQL dates and times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=459934 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.1 ||6010-6.el7 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DateTime-Format-Pg-0.16010-6.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1165620] Review Request: biber - Command-line bibliographic manager, BibTeX replacement
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1165620 --- Comment #11 from Colin Macdonald --- Upstream thinks we can relax the Unicode::Collate requirement so I'll do that and leave a comment in the spec file on my next revision. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- xml2-0.5-7.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml2-0.5-7.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 492708] Review Request: xml2 - XML/Unix Processing Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=492708 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- xml2-0.5-7.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/xml2-0.5-7.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148704] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto - Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166919] Review Request: python-fastcache - C implementation of python3 lru_cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-fastcache-1.0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170149] Review Request: mingw-librsvg2 - SVG library based on cairo for MinGW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- mingw-librsvg2-2.40.6-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147351] Review Request: python-modestmaps - Modest Maps python port
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147351 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-modestmaps-1.4.6-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169966] Review Request: rocket - CLI for running app containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #11 from Matthew Miller --- (In reply to Lokesh Mandvekar from comment #7) > Maybe we could try a fedora rootfs instead, but no idea how well that'd > work, also gotta check with upstream about that (if we're to pursue that > option) > > Correct me if I'm wrong, people If the intention is to require CoreOS as the stage1 rootfs it's kind of a nonstarter for every other distribution -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169966] Review Request: rocket - CLI for running app containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 --- Comment #10 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- (In reply to Tomas Tomecek from comment #9) > Wanted to give rocket a shot, so I made your spec a source of information; > couple points: > > * latest build of go-bindata is 0.0.6, while your spec requires 3.0.7-1 (on > the other hand, I can see that you have built the new version in koji, looks > like that repos weren't regenerated yet) yup only built for rawhide (mostly to get this going), I'll push builds for others soon, co-maintainers welcome :) > > * my VM missed gnupg, might be a good idea to add it to buildrequires hmm, koji didn't seem to complain, but I will double-check > > * (same point for tar but since it's in minimum build env set, it doesn't > make sense to make it a BR I guess) ack -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170824] New: Review Request: nodejs-async-each - Async parallel forEach / map function for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170824 Bug ID: 1170824 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-async-each - Async parallel forEach / map function for JavaScript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-async-each.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-async-each-0.1.6-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Async parallel forEach / map function for JavaScript Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170811] Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170811 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1170816 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170816 [Bug 1170816] Review Request: nodejs-astral-angular-annotate - AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170815] Review Request: nodejs-astral-pass - Pass helper for Astral that simplifies traversal.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170815 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1170816 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170816 [Bug 1170816] Review Request: nodejs-astral-angular-annotate - AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170816] Review Request: nodejs-astral-angular-annotate - AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170816 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1170815, 1170811 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170811 [Bug 1170811] Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170815 [Bug 1170815] Review Request: nodejs-astral-pass - Pass helper for Astral that simplifies traversal. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170816] New: Review Request: nodejs-astral-angular-annotate - AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170816 Bug ID: 1170816 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-astral-angular-annotate - AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral-angular-annotate.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral-angular-annotate-0.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: AngularJS DI annotation pass for astral Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170815] New: Review Request: nodejs-astral-pass - Pass helper for Astral that simplifies traversal.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170815 Bug ID: 1170815 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-astral-pass - Pass helper for Astral that simplifies traversal. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral-pass.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral-pass-0.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Pass helper for Astral that simplifies traversal. Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170812] Review Request: nodejs-astral - AST tooling framework for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170812 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1170811 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170811 [Bug 1170811] Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170811] Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170811 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1170812 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170812 [Bug 1170812] Review Request: nodejs-astral - AST tooling framework for JavaScript -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170812] New: Review Request: nodejs-astral - AST tooling framework for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170812 Bug ID: 1170812 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-astral - AST tooling framework for JavaScript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-astral-0.1.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: AST tooling framework for JavaScript Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170811] New: Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170811 Bug ID: 1170811 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-clone - deep cloning of objects and arrays Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-clone.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-clone-0.1.18-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: deep cloning of objects and arrays Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170802] New: Review Request: nodejs-relateurl - Minify URLs by converting them from absolute to relative
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170802 Bug ID: 1170802 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-relateurl - Minify URLs by converting them from absolute to relative Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: piotr1...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-relateurl.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-relateurl-0.2.5-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Minify URLs by converting them from absolute to relative Fedora Account System Username: piotrp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170072] Review Request: python-rfc6266 - Parse and generate Content-Disposition headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170072 --- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169358] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride - Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169358 --- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170072] Review Request: python-rfc6266 - Parse and generate Content-Disposition headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170072 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169358] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride - Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169358 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 --- Comment #24 from Kevin Fenzi --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179904] Review Request: icecast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179904 --- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179904] Review Request: icecast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179904 Kevin Fenzi changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 179904] Review Request: icecast
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179904 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #10 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- I want to build to epel7. # Package Change Request == Package Name: icecast New Branches: epel7 Owners: besser82 ixs InitialCC: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 526738] Review Request: py-radix - Radix tree data structure for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=526738 Matt Domsch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #23 from Matt Domsch --- Package Change Request == Package Name: py-radix New Branches: EL-7 Owners: InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154213] Review Request: python-structlog - Painless structural logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154213 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-structlog-0.4.2-5.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-structlog-0.4.2-5.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170664] Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170664 --- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch --- Thank you for your fast review! Fixed the issues: Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-mistune.spec SRPM URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-mistune-0.4.1-2.fc20.src.rpm Koji rawhide build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8296802 Greetings, Christian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169358] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride - Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169358 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman --- (In reply to Jitka Plesnikova from comment #1) > > TODO: Remove BRs perl(Test::Builder), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage), they are > not used Done. Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride/perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride/perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.10-2.fc20.src.rpm > Package APPROVED. Thank you, Jikta. Requesting SCM. New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride Short Description: Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride/ Owners: eseyman Branches: f21 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170774] New: Review Request: upconvert - A python script that converts between schematic file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170774 Bug ID: 1170774 Summary: Review Request: upconvert - A python script that converts between schematic file formats Product: Fedora Version: 21 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/upconvert.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/upconvert-0.8.9-1.20140403gita5975a5.fc21.src.rpm Description: A command line python anything-in anything-out file converter to go between the multitude of electrical circuit schematic file formats. This project was started by Upverter (http://upverter.com). The converter can import and export in the following formats: Upverter OpenJSON KiCad gEDA Fritzing NC Drill Eagle Eagle XML (in testing) ViewDraw/DxDesigner (in testing) DSN (in testing) PNG Image Bill of Materials CSV Netlist Altium (in development) Telesis Netlist (in development) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154213] Review Request: python-structlog - Painless structural logging
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154213 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-structlog-0.4.2-5.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-structlog-0.4.2-5.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170664] Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170664
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Spura ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
- The egg is not deleted.
- Please be more specific in %files.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
/usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__ should not be owned, only
%{upname}.* inside it.
Could you please be a bit more specific in %files, such as:
%{python2_sitearch}/%{upname}.*
%{python2_sitearch}/%{upname}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
Python:
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
Please do so.
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-mistune
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
archite
[Bug 1168907] Package Review: freerouting - Circuit Board Routing Tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168907 Richard Marko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rma...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rma...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168907] Package Review: freerouting - Circuit Board Routing Tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168907 Richard Marko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 Juan Orti changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2014-12-04 14:30:34 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170213] Review Request: modoboa - Mail hosting and management platform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170213 Bug 1170213 depends on bug 1169895, which changed state. Bug 1169895 Summary: Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170072] Review Request: python-rfc6266 - Parse and generate Content-Disposition headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170072 Juan Orti changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Juan Orti --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-rfc6266 Short Description: Parse and generate Content-Disposition headers Upstream URL: https://github.com/g2p/rfc6266 Owners: jorti Branches: f19 f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170664] Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170664 Thomas Spura changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|toms...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170072] Review Request: python-rfc6266 - Parse and generate Content-Disposition headers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170072
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages,
/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/__pycache__, /usr/lib/python3.4
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python3-rfc6266
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should c
[Bug 1167830] Review Request: python-ptyprocess - Run a subprocess in a pseudo terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167830 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1167830] Review Request: python-ptyprocess - Run a subprocess in a pseudo terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167830 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Same error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135503] Review Request: khelpcenter - Application to show KDE Application's documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135503 --- Comment #5 from Kevin Kofler --- The -O3 comes from CMake's default flags for the Release build type. I think KDE 4 overrode those in FindKDE4Internal.cmake, but KF5 keeps CMake's defaults. IMHO, we should change that default in the cmake package. And yes, ANY package that uses -O3 without a good justification (and "CMake has broken defaults" is not) should not pass review. I think using RelWithDebInfo instead will make it use -O2, it may or may not have other side effects. (IIRC, we opted against defaulting to RelWithDebInfo because KDE 4 stuff only had -DNDEBUG in Release, or something like that. Not sure how KF5 behaves there.) But I insist, the default for Release should be fixed in CMake packaging. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1167830] Review Request: python-ptyprocess - Run a subprocess in a pseudo terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1167830 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Pierre-YvesChibon --- This is odd, the group is present both in FAS and pkgdb. @Jon, would you mind trying again? Maybe we hit some caching issue or something weird. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170720] Review Request: mingw-colorhug-client - MinGW Tools for the Hughski ColorHug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170720 David King changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||amigad...@amigadave.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|amigad...@amigadave.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170720] New: Review Request: mingw-colorhug-client - MinGW Tools for the Hughski ColorHug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170720 Bug ID: 1170720 Summary: Review Request: mingw-colorhug-client - MinGW Tools for the Hughski ColorHug Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rhug...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/mingw-colorhug-client.spec SRPM URL: http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/temp/mingw-colorhug-client-0.2.4-1.fc22.src.rpm Koji URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8295544 Description: MinGW Tools for the Hughski ColorHug Fedora Account System Username: rhughes Other notes: The ColorHug is an open-source, open-hardware colorimeter device designed for Linux users and developers. I'm also the project lead upstream :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1142407] Review Request: drpm - deltarpm manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142407 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt --- For example: $ pkg-config --cflags --libs drpm Package rpm-devel was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `rpm-devel.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'rpm-devel', required by 'drpm', not found > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8286489 > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6491/8286491/build.log cc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -std=c99 -pedantic -Wall -Wextra -fPIC -g -O0 -c -o drpm.o drpm.c #warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) [-Wcpp] # warning _FORTIFY_SOURCE requires compiling with optimization (-O) https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-sievelib-0.8-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169358] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride - Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169358 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.10-1.fc22.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl >= 1:5.8.1 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.1) 1 perl(Plack::Middleware) 1 perl(URI) 1 perl(parent) 1 perl(strict) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.10-1.fc22.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Plack::Middleware::MethodOverride) = 0.10 1 perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride = 0.10-1.fc22 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride.spec ./perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride-0.10-1.fc22.* perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US http -> HTTP 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint is ok TODO: Remove BRs perl(Test::Builder), perl(Test::Pod::Coverage), they are not used Otherwise package is good. Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148704] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto - Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148704] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto - Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148704] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto - Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-go-crypto-0-0.1.hg69e2a90ed92d.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148704] Review Request: golang-googlecode-go-crypto - Supplementary Go cryptography libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148704 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114737] Review Request: openms - Open-source software for LC/MS data management and analyses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737
--- Comment #15 from Jerry James ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jerry James from comment #13)
> > - The main package installs over 93 Mbytes of files in %{_datadir},
> > including
> > the examples. Can any of those files go into a noarch subpackage?
>
> Too sub-packages in my opinion.
>
> > - The entire %{_datadir}/OpenMS directory, except for the examples, is
> > duplicated in the python-openms package, as
> > %{python2_sitearch}/pyopenms/share/OpenMS. Is that really necessary? Can
> > %{python2_sitearch}/pyopenms/share/OpenMS instead be a symbolic link to
> > %{_datadir}/OpenMS?
>
> Python OpenMS may be used as standalone software so it must have own data
> directories.
This means that we are duplicating that 93 Mbytes of files across all
architectures, and over 2 packages per architecture. All you need to do is
make a single subpackage, say openmms-data, that is noarch, contains all this
data, and is a dependency of both the main package and python-mms, and all that
duplication will go away. It really is worth doing. Please consider it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 449784] Review Request: rpmreaper - A tool for removing packages from system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=449784 Miroslav Lichvar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #7 from Miroslav Lichvar --- Package Change Request == Package Name: rpmreaper New Branches: epel7 Owners: mlichvar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170664] Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170664 --- Comment #1 from Christian Dersch --- Small adjustment, new Koji build for rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8295003 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168009] Review Request: python-gbpclient - Python API and CLI for OpenStack Neutron Group Based Policy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168009 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168009] Review Request: python-gbpclient - Python API and CLI for OpenStack Neutron Group Based Policy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168009 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170664] New: Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170664 Bug ID: 1170664 Summary: Review Request: python-mistune - Markdown parser for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lupi...@mailbox.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-mistune.spec SRPM URL: https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-mistune-0.4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: Markdown parser for Python Fedora Account System Username: lupinix Koji builds: rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8294829 f20 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8294851 f21 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8294845 Thanks for review in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168006] Review Request: openstack-neutron-gbp - Group Based Policy service plugin for OpenStack Networking Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168006 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168006] Review Request: openstack-neutron-gbp - Group Based Policy service plugin for OpenStack Networking Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168006 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1114737] Review Request: openms - Open-source software for LC/MS data management and analyses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1114737
--- Comment #14 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #13)
> Issues:
> ===
> - The gtk-update-icon-cache invocations are being run on the main package,
> but
> instead should be run on the openms-TOPP package; i.e., move them to
> "%posttrans TOPP" and "%postun TOPP".
Done.
> - The source tarball, OpenMS-Release1.11.1.tar.gz, has 0600 permissions.
> Please change that to 0644.
Done.
> - All software in Fedora is open source, so I think the summary should just
> read "LC/MS data management and analyses"
Done.
> - The debuginfo generator gets a little confused while trying to locate some
> source files. Look in the build log for errors like this:
>
> cpio:
> OpenMS-Release1.11.1/include/OpenMS/ANALYSIS/DECHARGING/FeatureDeconvolution.
> h: Cannot stat: Permission denied
> cpio:
> OpenMS-Release1.11.1/include/OpenMS/ANALYSIS/DECHARGING/ILPDCWrapper.h:
> Cannot stat: Permission denied
>
> The problem is the initial "OpenMS-Release1.11.1" part of the path. To fix
> the problem, add this at the end of %install:
>
> ln -s . OpenMS-Release%{version}
Done.
> - The openms-devel package contains the directory /usr/include/OpenMS, but
> there are no files inside that directory. Also, the directory has 0644
> permissions, but should have 0755 permissions.
Done.
> - The openms-devel package installs a symbolic link libOpenMS_GUI.so that
> points to %{_libdir}/libOpenMS_GUIso.1.11.1, but the target name is
> actually
> %{_libdir}/libOpenMS_GUI.so.1.11.1; i.e., there is a missing dot.
Done.
> - ldd -u reports that the libraries and most of the binaries are linked with
> libraries that are not actually used; see the
> unused-direct-shlib-dependency
> rpmlint warnings below. It might we worthwhile to add "-Wl,--as-needed" to
> LDFLAGS.
Okay.
> - The cmake invocation specifies -DCMAKE_MT_ENABLE_TBB=ON and related
> variables, and the spec file contains BuildRequires: tbb-devel, yet I see
> this in the build log:
>
> -- Intel TBB: OFF
>
> Perhaps it should be -DMT_ENABLE_TBB=ON (without the "CMAKE_" prefix)?
Done.
> - Use the new %license macro to install license texts, rather than %doc.
Done.
> - The main package installs 80 Mbytes of files in
> %{_datadir}/OpenMS/examples.
> Are those files used at runtime? If not, consider moving them to a -doc
> subpackage.
They could be used as examples by a beginner user.
> - The main package installs over 93 Mbytes of files in %{_datadir}, including
> the examples. Can any of those files go into a noarch subpackage?
Too sub-packages in my opinion.
> - The entire %{_datadir}/OpenMS directory, except for the examples, is
> duplicated in the python-openms package, as
> %{python2_sitearch}/pyopenms/share/OpenMS. Is that really necessary? Can
> %{python2_sitearch}/pyopenms/share/OpenMS instead be a symbolic link to
> %{_datadir}/OpenMS?
Python OpenMS may be used as standalone software so it must have own data
directories.
> - Some installed files have their executable bits set inappropriately. See
> the rpmlint messages about scripts without shebangs.
> - /usr/share/OpenMS/CV/psi-mzdata.obo has DOS end-of-line markers.
> - Fix the description-line-too-long error in the rpmlint output.
>
Okay.
I'm building latest release; soon i will post it.
Thanks.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169358] Review Request: perl-Plack-Middleware-MethodOverride - Override REST methods to Plack apps via POST
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169358 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168009] Review Request: python-gbpclient - Python API and CLI for OpenStack Neutron Group Based Policy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168009 Robert Kukura changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Kukura --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-gbpclient Short Description: Python API and CLI for OpenStack Neutron Group Based Policy Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/group-based-policy-client Owners: rkukura Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168006] Review Request: openstack-neutron-gbp - Group Based Policy service plugin for OpenStack Networking Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168006 Robert Kukura changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Robert Kukura --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: openstack-neutron-gbp Short Description: Group Based Policy service plugin for OpenStack Networking Service Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/group-based-policy Owners: rkukura Branches: f20 f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170629] New: Review Request: python-ncclient - Python library for NETCONF clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170629 Bug ID: 1170629 Summary: Review Request: python-ncclient - Python library for NETCONF clients Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ihrac...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ihrachys/python-ncclient.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/~ihrachys/python-ncclient-0.4.2-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: This project is a Python library that facilitates client-side scripting and application development around the NETCONF protocol. Fedora Account System Username: ihrachyshka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.fc19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- 2048-cli-0.8-2.el5 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 5. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/2048-cli-0.8-2.el5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141528] Review Request: php-horde-mnemo - A web based notes manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141528 --- Comment #2 from Remi Collet --- Update to 4.2.3 (security) https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/2a1d024c443081812cd205c3b0f8462aa1186272 Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/2a1d024c443081812cd205c3b0f8462aa1186272/php/horde/php-horde-mnemo/php-horde-mnemo.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-horde-mnemo-4.2.3-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1170231] Review Request: 2048-cli - The game 2048 for your Linux terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1170231 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169895] Review Request: python-sievelib - Client-side SIEVE library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169895 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168260] Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the data from a debian Packages.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168260] Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the data from a debian Packages.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
