[Bug 1172968] Review Request: nodejs-event-stream - Construct pipes of streams of events

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172968

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1173387] Review Request: nodejs-browser-request - Browser port of the Node.js 'request' package

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173387

Parag pnem...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2014-12-25 05:32:19



--- Comment #9 from Parag pnem...@redhat.com ---
Built in rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1172976] Review Request: nodejs-follow - Extremely robust, fault-tolerant CouchDB changes follower

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172976
Bug 1172976 depends on bug 1173387, which changed state.

Bug 1173387 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-browser-request - Browser port of 
the Node.js 'request' package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173387

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413



--- Comment #20 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19)
 Hi Christopher.
 
 I have a smuxi-0.11 src-package almost ready for the review.
 Please, let me know if you are still interested to it; maybe we can
 co-maintain this package with Jeff, too.

Does your src package have the suggested package split?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413



--- Comment #21 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #20)
 (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #19)
  Hi Christopher.
  
  I have a smuxi-0.11 src-package almost ready for the review.
  Please, let me know if you are still interested to it; maybe we can
  co-maintain this package with Jeff, too.
 
 Does your src package have the suggested package split?

I have splitted in this way:

smuxi
smuxi-engine
smuxi-frontend-gnome
smuxi-stfl
smuxi-devel

and I have a doubt if we must use 'gautil' to register all .dll files.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Mono#gacutil_in_a_spec_file

However, 'gautil' fails with

Failure adding assembly bin/debug/?.dll to the cache: Attempt to install an
assembly without a strong name

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177055] (mesos) Review Request: mesos - Cluster Manager

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177055

Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||kushal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Ratnadeep Debnath rtn...@gmail.com ---
I have written some simple Python scripts[1] to figure out all missing
dependencies for mesos in CentOS 7 and EPEL 7 repositories and generate data
for creating a dependency graph.

Here's what I got: [2]. The data may not be perfect, but it's a good point to
start. In Fedora 21, Java packages use java-1.8.0-openjdk. However, I was able
to run successful build on EPEL7 enabled CentOS 7 with java-1.7.0-openjdk. So,
I will start by updating the Java dependency for all Java based packages and
run their builds.

[1]: https://github.com/rtnpro/rpmdev-assistant
[2]: https://gist.github.com/rtnpro/49bcc7020dd9a095bca9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1123511] Review Request: nanomsg - A fast, scalable, and easy to use socket library

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1123511

Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugs.mich...@gmx.net



--- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt bugs.mich...@gmx.net ---
Not much left:

* SONAME has not changed. It's still libnanomsg.so.0


* If you insist on creating a separate -doc package for only 39 files with a
total size of 1,021,705 bytes, also consider adding BuildArch: noarch to that
subpackage.



# pkg-config libnanomsg --libs
-lnanomsg -lanl -lrt 

Kinda odd to relink with libanl and librt since libnanomsg is linked with those
two already, and the nanomsg API does not pull in anything for those two libs:

  # grep .*#include /usr/include/nanomsg/*
  /usr/include/nanomsg/nn.h:#include errno.h
  /usr/include/nanomsg/nn.h:#include stddef.h
  /usr/include/nanomsg/reqrep.h:#include nn.h



The testsuite succeeds with this release, provided that the spec file points
the runtime linker at the freshly built lib:

--- nanomsg.spec.ORIG2014-11-15 00:34:06.0 +0100
+++ nanomsg.spec2014-12-25 15:42:38.301122955 +0100
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 %check
 # conditional: currently failing tests:
https://github.com/nanomsg/nanomsg/issues/281
 %if %{with check}
-make check DESTDIR=%{buildroot}
+LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$(pwd)/.libs make check
 %endif


Testsuite summary for nanomsg 0.5-beta

# TOTAL: 31
# PASS:  31
# SKIP:  0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL:  0
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413

Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard|NotReady|NotReady, Stalled



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413

Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|mmmba...@gnome.org  |
 CC||mmmba...@gnome.org



--- Comment #22 from Mirco Bauer mmmba...@gnome.org ---
Smuxi's libs are private and thus not signed. Unsigned assemblies can't be
installed into the GAC. The stfl package should be called smuxi-frontend-stfl
because it is also a frontend like GNOME.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1033413] Review Request: smuxi - An user-friendly IRC client based on GNOME/GTK+

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033413



--- Comment #23 from Antonio Trande anto.tra...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Mirco Bauer from comment #22)
 Smuxi's libs are private and thus not signed. Unsigned assemblies can't be
 installed into the GAC. The stfl package should be called
 smuxi-frontend-stfl because it is also a frontend like GNOME.

Okay.

My package is ready.
I'm waiting for a reply from Christopher, if he will not make contact in some
days, i close this review and take this package according to the policies for
stalled package reviews.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1174479] Review Request: beets - Music library manager and MusicBrainz tagger

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174479



--- Comment #3 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org ---
Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/beets/beets.spec
SRPM URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/beets/beets-1.3.9-2.fc22.src.rpm

For now I've disabled the following plugins (due to dependencies not existing
in Fedora):
- echonest
- echonest_tempo
- replaygain
- web
- convert
- discogs

The plugins were split off into a separate package.

Thanks,
Michele

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1051688] Review Request: compton - compositor forked from xcompmgr-dana

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051688

bodhi.zazen bodhi.za...@montanalinux.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bodhi.za...@montanalinux.or
   ||g



--- Comment #3 from bodhi.zazen bodhi.za...@montanalinux.org ---
I am posting here as I am willing to package this (rather then opening a new
review request)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1174288] Review Request: owl-lisp - functional dialect of Scheme

2014-12-25 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174288



--- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
One more fix needed. Compilation is not honoring compiler flags as given in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags

You need to use in %build as
%build
make CFLAGS=%{optflags} %{?_smp_mflags}

# Fix permissions for -debuginfo rpmlint warning
chmod 644 c/ol.c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review