[Bug 1179350] Review Request: python-pytest-beakerlib - A pytest plugin that reports test results to the BeakerLib framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179350
Niranjan MR changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||niran...@ashoo.in
--- Comment #1 from Niranjan MR ---
Greetings,
Please note this is Un-official review.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
! %check is present and all tests pass.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/review/1179350
-python-pytest-beakerlib/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 102400 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[?]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
-pytest-beakerlib
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[
[Bug 1180460] New: Review Request: ghc-JuicyPixels - Picture loading and serialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180460 Bug ID: 1180460 Summary: Review Request: ghc-JuicyPixels - Picture loading and serialization Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-JuicyPixels.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-JuicyPixels-3.2.1-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: This library can load and store images in PNG, Bitmap, Jpeg, Radiance, Tiff and Gif images. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180460] Review Request: ghc-JuicyPixels - Picture loading and serialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180460 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8568111 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180460] Review Request: ghc-JuicyPixels - Picture loading and serialization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180460 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org Blocks||1095644 Whiteboard||Ready Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1095644 [Bug 1095644] pandoc-1.13.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128480] Review Request: pipsi - Wraps pip and virtualenv to install scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480 Robert Kuska changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert Kuska --- Just a note for others, pipsi allows to specify python interpreter as --python python3 when user wants python3 virtualenv so I am fine with pipsi being only python2 package. Looks good, APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174408] Review Request: libblockdev - A library for low-level manipulation with block devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174408 Vratislav Podzimek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Vratislav Podzimek --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: libblockdev Short Description: A library for low-level manipulation with block devices Upstream URL: https://github.com/vpodzime/libblockdev Owners: vpodzime Branches: f20 f21 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128480] Review Request: pipsi - Wraps pip and virtualenv to install scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480 Matej Stuchlik changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Matej Stuchlik --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: pipsi Short Description: Wraps pip and virtualenv to install scripts Upstream URL: http://github.com/mitsuhiko/pipsi/ Owners: mstuchli Branches: f21 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179133] Review Request: rubygem-globalid - Refer to any model with a URI: gid://app/class/id
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179133 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Vít Ondruch --- The package builds just fine: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8568152 and I can't fine any other issues => APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822187] Review Request: novnc - websockets based VNC client and simple server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822187 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@gmail.com Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #24 from Alan Pevec --- Unretiring novnc in EPEL6 https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/206230.html Package Change Request == Package Name: novnc New Branches: el6 Owners: apevec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1038274] Review Request: rubygem-liquid - A secure, non-evaling end user template engine with aesthetic markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038274 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-liquid-3.0.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169493] Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169493 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-markups-0.5.2-4.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-09 06:54:30 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-markups-0.5.2-4.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169498] Review Request: retext - Text editor for Markdown and reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169498 Bug 1169498 depends on bug 1169493, which changed state. Bug 1169493 Summary: Review Request: python-markups - A wrapper around various text markups https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169493 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277 --- Comment #28 from Raphael Groner --- Ivan, you have to set review-granted cause you are the reviewer according to the normal process. Otherwise you (or I) may remove the ownership, unfortunately. I do not want to orphan the package! Thanks for your help. Also at Björn. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822187] Review Request: novnc - websockets based VNC client and simple server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822187 --- Comment #25 from Jon Ciesla --- Complete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 822187] Review Request: novnc - websockets based VNC client and simple server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822187 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018092] Review Request: barman - Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092 --- Comment #22 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018092] Review Request: barman - Backup and Recovery Manager for PostgreSQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018092 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128480] Review Request: pipsi - Wraps pip and virtualenv to install scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174408] Review Request: libblockdev - A library for low-level manipulation with block devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174408 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128480] Review Request: pipsi - Wraps pip and virtualenv to install scripts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128480 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1174408] Review Request: libblockdev - A library for low-level manipulation with block devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174408 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178684] Review Request: gnome-multi-writer - Write an ISO file to multiple USB devices at once
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178684 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- gnome-multi-writer-3.15.2-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gnome-multi-writer-3.15.2-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #14 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #13) > Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml.spec > SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml-5.11.0-5.fc22.src.rpm > koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8541928 > > version -5: unbundle minizip, add render extension. There is code for Octave, C#, Java, Ruby bindings with related tests which can be included in this SPEC file. Some patches have been added by upstream maintainer for RPM packaging in Fedora (http://sourceforge.net/p/sbml/libsbml/milestone/libSBML-5.11.0/). Why ignore them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1169966] Review Request: rocket - CLI for running app containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1169966 Iago López changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i...@endocode.com --- Comment #29 from Iago López --- I just wanna mention that, as discussed in https://github.com/coreos/rocket/issues/43, fetching and running images should not be restricted to the superuser. To allow that, a "rocket" group should be created and permissions in /var/lib/rkt/ should be set accordingly. That is: drwxrwxr-x 4 root rocket 4.0K Jan 9 10:37 cas/ drwxrwx--- 4 root rocket 4.0K Jan 9 10:56 containers/ drwxrwxr-x 2 root rocket 4.0K Jan 9 10:56 tmp/ Then, any user belonging to "rocket" can fetch images and read them (running is not possible since systemd-nspawn requires root). I think distribution packages are a good place for setting these. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179350] Review Request: python-pytest-beakerlib - A pytest plugin that reports test results to the BeakerLib framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179350 --- Comment #2 from Petr Viktorin --- Thanks for the review! With separate %doc the diffs are prettier, so I'd like to leave that as it is. For python2_sitelib and the copyright notice, I made a new release, 0.4-2: Spec URL: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/python-pytest-beakerlib.git/plain/python-pytest-beakerlib.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~pviktori/srpms/python-pytest-beakerlib-0.4-2.fc21.src.rpm COPR: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/pviktori/pytest-plugins/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1007619] Review Request: eatmydata - Library and utilities designed to disable fsync
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1007619 Derek Higgins changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- gerrymander-1.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/gerrymander-1.4-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #15 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14) > Why ignore them? Jest plain laziness^W^W minimization of work. Package description has the following text: "LibSBML is compiled with Python and PERL bindings for Fedora. If you need additional bindings, feel free to create a bug report." I suspect that for those esoteric binding the use will be close to nil. But if you think that there are users who will use C# and other bindings, we can add them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1121601] Review Request: rt - request tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601 --- Comment #13 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Trevor Cordes from comment #12) > Hi, I just upgraded to F21 and (obviously) it broke my rt(3), so to my > dismay I come here and see there is no rtX in F21 (yet?). That may be a bit > disturbing and suprising for upgraders. Correct. rt3 is dead, gone and abandoned upstream, and should be removed anywhere (comprising EPEL and Fedora), because running it is a security risk. I had hoped this package was ready in time to replace rt3, unfortunately there doesn't seem to be sufficient interest in rt in Fedora to provide a review :( > Anyhow, what's the easiest way for me to rt back on my system. I realize it > will be rt4. Should I just grab your src/spec you provide here and build it > up myself? That's what I do - I am using them ;) > Will the fc22 srpms work on fc21? There also are fc21 versions on https://corsepiu.fedorapeople.org/packages I also have older versions of them on the packman repo (ftp://packman.links2linux.de/pub/packman/fedora). Likely I'll sync them with my Fedora submission. > What's going to be the ongoing plan for rt on F21? There is no plan - It's just that this review is stuck ;) > What's the best way for > me to ensure I stay patched? It certainly would be best to provide a review, such that these packages can be provided through Fedora :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #16 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #15) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #14) > > Why ignore them? > Jest plain laziness^W^W minimization of work. > > Package description has the following text: "LibSBML is compiled with Python > and PERL bindings for Fedora. If you need additional bindings, feel free to > create a bug report." I suspect that for those esoteric binding the use will > be close to nil. But if you think that there are users who will use C# and > other bindings, we can add them. Well, libsbml/libsedml/linsbw/copasi maintainers helped me a lot in these days for all bindings. I think they are still interested but i don't know if these libraries are really useful to somebody. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177857] Review Request: libsedml - Library that fully supports SED-ML for SBML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177857 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: libSEDML - |Review Request: libsedml - |Library that fully supports |Library that fully supports |SED-ML for SBML |SED-ML for SBML --- Comment #2 from Antonio Trande --- Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSEDML/libsedml-0.3.0-3.20141230gitb455cd.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177958] Review Request: libsbw - C++ Broker library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177958 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: libSBW -|Review Request: libsbw - |C++ Broker library |C++ Broker library --- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande --- Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSBW/libsbw.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSBW/libsbw-2.11.1-2.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176658] Review Request: adwaita-qt - Adwaita Qt theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176658 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1176658] Review Request: adwaita-qt - Adwaita Qt theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176658 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- naming: ok license: ok sources: ok 69e3c8927d88fe0a5f1846ce983c2f9d 024b00bfd7c8cb27d09188ddc239391c2c05bac4.tar.gz macros: ok scriptlets: ok (n/a) some non-blockery stuff: * SHOULD consider making -common subpkg noarch * SHOULD consider moving Requires: oxygen-icon-theme to -common, or remove it... having it in the main meta-pkg makes less sense otherwise, relatively simple and clean: APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173205] Review Request: nodejs-dependency-lister - Lists your module's dependencies with URLs and licenses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173205 --- Comment #3 from Parag --- nodejs-yargs is updated just now on all stable branches. Can we have this approved now? thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- I cannot see any problem now, approving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1070482] Review Request: reaver-wps - Brute force attack against Wifi Protected Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070482 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965835] Review Request: mingw-protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965835 --- Comment #4 from Pavol Rusnak --- Bump? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 850949] Review Request: pam_google_authenticator - Pluggable authentication module for Google Authenticator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=850949 --- Comment #11 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 913574] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-per-window-keyboard-layout - Remembers keyboard layout for each window
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=913574 --- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180698] New: Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class software phone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180698 Bug ID: 1180698 Summary: Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class software phone Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: manisan...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/sflphone.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/sflphone-1.4.1-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class software phone Fedora Account System Username: smani Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8572738 Currently builds on rawhide only (needing iaxclient-libiax, see [1]). FPC ticket for bundling exception of libiax for F20, F21 filed here [2]. [1] https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-January/206126.html [2] https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/491 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692131] Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class softphone for multi-way conferencing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692131 Bug 692131 depends on bug 1128464, which changed state. Bug 1128464 Summary: Update to 0.2.3 (unofficial) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128464 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 692131] Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class softphone for multi-way conferencing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692131 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2015-01-09 12:44:16 --- Comment #25 from Sandro Mani --- All pieces are now in place. New review request posted in bug 1180698. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1180698 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180698] Review Request: sflphone - SIP/IAX2 compatible enterprise-class software phone
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180698 Sandro Mani changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) CC||linux.n@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani --- *** Bug 692131 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361 --- Comment #11 from MartinKG --- Created attachment 978352 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=978352&action=edit 0001-unbundle-tinyxml.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361 --- Comment #12 from MartinKG --- Created attachment 978353 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=978353&action=edit 0002-unbundle-bullet.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361 --- Comment #13 from MartinKG --- Created attachment 978354 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=978354&action=edit 0003-unbundle-shiny.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361 --- Comment #14 from MartinKG --- Created attachment 978356 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=978356&action=edit 0004-unbundle-pagedgeometry.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984560] Review Request: Enki - Extensible text editor for programmers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560 --- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177958] Review Request: libsbw - C++ Broker library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177958 --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSBW/libsbw.spec SRPM URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/libSBW/libsbw-2.11.1-3.fc21.src.rpm Static file packaged again; the binary file seems directly linked to it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178361] Review Request: stuntrally - Stunt Rally game with Track Editor, based on VDrift and OGRE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178361 --- Comment #15 from MartinKG --- i attached the patches for unbundle tinyxml, bullet, shiny and pagedgeometry here again, because they differs from Igor's patches on https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/public_git/stuntrally.git/tree/ 82 % of the code compiles fine with the recent spec file https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/stuntrally/SPECS/stuntrally-2.5-5/stuntrally.spec but then a error message comes: /usr/bin/cmake -E cmake_progress_report /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/build/CMakeFiles [ 82%] Building CXX object source/CMakeFiles/stuntrally.dir/ogre/common/Slider.cpp.o cd /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/build/source && /usr/bin/c++ -DOGRE_PLUGIN_DIR_DBG=\"/lib64/OGRE\" -DOGRE_PLUGIN_DIR_REL=\"/lib64/OGRE\" -DSHARED_DATA_DIR=\"/usr/share/stuntrally\" -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic -fno-strict-aliasing -fPIC -O3 -DNDEBUG -I/usr/include/OGRE -I/usr/include/OGRE/Terrain -I/usr/include/OGRE/Paging -I/usr/include/OGRE/Overlay -I/usr/include/bullet -I/usr/include/SDL2 -I/usr/include/MYGUI -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/btOgre -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/paged-geom -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/road -I/home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/vdrift-o CMakeFiles/stuntrally.dir/ogre/common/Slider.cpp.o -c /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.cpp In file included from /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.cpp:3:0: /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.h: In constructor 'MyGUI::Slider::Slider()': /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.h:56:9: warning: 'MyGUI::Slider::mfValue' will be initialized after [-Wreorder] float mfValue; ^ /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.h:24:9: warning: 'float MyGUI::Slider::mfDefault' [-Wreorder] float mfDefault; ^ /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/Slider.cpp:12:2: warning: when initialized here [-Wreorder] Slider::Slider() : ^ /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/SceneTrees.cpp: In member function 'void CScene::CreateTrees()': /home/martin/rpmbuild/BUILD/stuntrally-2.5/source/ogre/common/SceneTrees.cpp:194:38: error: 'class Forests::PagedGeometry' has no member named 'getTempDir' resMgr.addResourceLocation(trees->getTempDir(), "FileSystem", "BinFolder"); ^ that means that OGRE with pagedgeometry must be unbundled also ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1180723] New: Review Request: clufter - Tool for transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1180723 Bug ID: 1180723 Summary: Review Request: clufter - Tool for transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jpoko...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jnpkrn/clufter/next/misc/clufter.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jpokorny/pkgs/clufter/review/clufter-0.3.3_alpha-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Tool for transforming/analyzing cluster configuration formats Fedora Account System Username: jpokorny COPR: http://copr-fe.cloud.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jpokorny/clufter/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1171553] Review Request: csvdiff - Generate a diff between two CSV files on the command-line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171553 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1171553] Review Request: csvdiff - Generate a diff between two CSV files on the command-line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171553 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- csvdiff-0.1.0-3.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/csvdiff-0.1.0-3.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 965835] Review Request: mingw-protobuf - Protocol Buffers - Google's data interchange format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=965835 František Dvořák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(ulat...@yahoo.com | |) | Last Closed||2015-01-09 16:00:31 --- Comment #5 from František Dvořák --- Yes, let's close this one. New review can be submitted, if needed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1155400] Review Request: pygeoip - Pure Python GeoIP API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155400 --- Comment #10 from William Moreno --- Hello, I have not updated this package, this is a dependency for another app than I would like to package into RPM, it is ERP Next, but there will make a new release soon (I guees so), so I am waiting the reales of v5 for return to this project. By the way, did you find a sponsor? Maybe i can help you to find one, in the other hand I have some packaqes in review but I did not find a reviewer yet, maybe you can help me to review those packages please. Regards. William -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 Donald Pellegrino changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dapellegr...@dow.com --- Comment #9 from Donald Pellegrino --- I am unable to find a package for Apache Jena by searching for "jena" in the Fedora Package List (https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/s/jena). I do not see it in the list of Deprecated Packages (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Deprecated_packages). This bug report was closed in 2011 and marked as NEXTRELEASE, so I expected to find the package in the distribution. What is the status of this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 740814] Review Request: jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web Applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=740814 --- Comment #10 from Alexander Kurtakov --- The maintainer retired it as he lost interest in it. If you want to revive it please open a new review request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 749673] eclipse-mylyn: Build Eclipse Mylyn code review integration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=749673 --- Comment #12 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868 --- Comment #7 from Fedora End Of Life --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179947] Review Request: python-parsley - Parsing and pattern matching made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179947 --- Comment #4 from Robert Mayr --- Thank you, changes applied here: Spec URL: https://robyduck.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/python-parsley.spec SRPM URL: https://robyduck.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-parsley-1.2-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179947] Review Request: python-parsley - Parsing and pattern matching made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179947 Eduardo Echeverria changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Ok tests not ready for now. Please check with upstream [echevemaster@localhost ~]$ rpmlint -vi python-parsley-1.2-3.fc22.noarch.rpm python-parsley.noarch: I: checking python-parsley.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US parsers -> parser, parses, parers The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-parsley.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US pyparsing -> sparring The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-parsley.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US yacc -> yak, Yacc, ya cc The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check. python-parsley.noarch: I: checking-url https://launchpad.net/parsley (timeout 10 seconds) 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1029750] Review Request: netbeans-platform - Continuing orphaned package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1029750 Julien Enselme changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-01-09 18:46:12 --- Comment #2 from Julien Enselme --- netbeans-platform is not an orhpan: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/netbeans-platform.git/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1179947] Review Request: python-parsley - Parsing and pattern matching made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179947 Robert Mayr changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Robert Mayr --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-parsley Short Description: Parsing and pattern matching made easy Upstream URL: https://launchpad.net/parsley Owners: robyduck Branches: f20 f21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177730] Review Request: php-patchwork-jsqueeze - Efficient JavaScript minification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177730 Adam Williamson (Fedora) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from Adam Williamson (Fedora) --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-patchwork-jsqueeze Short Description: JSqueeze shrinks / compresses / minifies / mangles Javascript code. Upstream URL: https://github.com/tchwork/jsqueeze Owners: adamwill Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1128253] Review Request: gerrymander - A client API and command line tool for gerrit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128253 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- gerrymander-1.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
