[Bug 1185082] Review Request: golang-github-golang-appengine - Go App Engine for Managed VMs

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186345] New: Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go wrapper for RocksDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345

Bug ID: 1186345
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go
wrapper for RocksDB
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb/golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb.spec

SRPM URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb/golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20.src.rpm

Description: Go wrapper for RocksDB

Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup

Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8736922

$ rpmlint golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20.src.rpm
golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-devel-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20.noarch.rpm
golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb.spec
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Upstream: https://github.com/influxdb/rocksdb

Notes: go test does not pass because there is not rocksdb in Fedora. This is
only a wrapper without database itself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171129] Review Request: freeradius-client - Client library and utilities for radius

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171129



--- Comment #11 from Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos nmavr...@redhat.com ---
  Generic:
  [!]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
   Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment.
   See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools
   This is probably best addressed by forwarding it upstream.
   See the list below for the obsolete macros found by fedora-review.
 
 I believe that these are autogenerated macros. If you check the open and
 closed issues in https://github.com/FreeRADIUS/freeradius-client/issues
 I have reported that they should not keep these files forever but
 auto-generate them per release. They upstream believes otherwise though.

My reply on this one, doesn't seem on the point. However, yes, I have brought
that issue to upstream.
https://github.com/nmav/radiusclient-dtls/commit/cd6ca2df74f9783115ca0265e35522f145889917

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185018] Review Request: gap-pkg-sonata - GAP package for systems of nearrings

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185018] Review Request: gap-pkg-sonata - GAP package for systems of nearrings

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185018

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240



--- Comment #28 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 453858] Review Request: globus-gsi-callback - Globus Toolkit - Globus GSI Callback Library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453858

Mattias Ellert mattias.ell...@fysast.uu.se changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|t.sai...@alumni.ethz.ch



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1150152] Review Request: rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint - Internal HashiCorp service to check version information

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150152

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1150152] Review Request: rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint - Internal HashiCorp service to check version information

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150152



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185932] Review Request: osgi-annotation - Annotations for use in compiling OSGi bundles

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185932



--- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185932] Review Request: osgi-annotation - Annotations for use in compiling OSGi bundles

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185932

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456



--- Comment #46 from Aleksandar Kostadinov akost...@redhat.com ---
@Michael, did you file a formal request somewhere I can monitor? I'm referring
to comment 44.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186346] New: Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go - Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346

Bug ID: 1186346
   Summary: Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go
- Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go/golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go.spec

SRPM URL:
https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go/golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc20.src.rpm

Description: Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB

Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup

Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8736926

Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup

$ rpmlint golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc20.src.rpm
golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-devel-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc20.noarch.rpm
golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go.spec
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

Upstream: https://github.com/influxdb/hyperleveldb-go

Notes: go test does not pass because there is not rocksdb in Fedora. This is
only a wrapper without database itself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186345] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go wrapper for RocksDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186346] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go - Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|l...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186345] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go wrapper for RocksDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1161618




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161618
[Bug 1161618] influxdb: please update to 0.8.5
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186346] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go - Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346

Jan Chaloupka jchal...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1161618




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161618
[Bug 1161618] influxdb: please update to 0.8.5
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186351] New: Review Request: rubygem-web-console - A set of debugging tools for your Rails application

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186351

Bug ID: 1186351
   Summary: Review Request: rubygem-web-console - A set of
debugging tools for your Rails application
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: vondr...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/vondruch/public_git/rubygem-web-console.git/tree/rubygem-web-console.spec?id=aa84cfe4b6097159b8d058bc9262add41f0683be
SRPM URL:
http://people.redhat.com/vondruch/rubygem-web-console-2.0.0-1.fc22.src.rpm
Description: A set of debugging tools for your Rails application
Fedora Account System Username: vondruch

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186351] Review Request: rubygem-web-console - A set of debugging tools for your Rails application

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186351

Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1184910
 Depends On||1185957




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184910
[Bug 1184910] Ruby on Rails 4.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957
[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the
binding of a method's caller
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957

Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1186351




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186351
[Bug 1186351] Review Request: rubygem-web-console - A set of debugging
tools for your Rails application
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957

Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the review!


New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rubygem-binding_of_caller
Short Description: Retrieve the binding of a method's caller
Upstream URL: http://github.com/banister/binding_of_caller
Owners: vondruch jstribny
Branches: 
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 904634] Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904634

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 904634] Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904634



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456



--- Comment #45 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185582] Review Request: openambit - Open software for the Suunto Ambit(2)

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185582



--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com ---
Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/openambit.spec
SRPM URL:
https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/openambit-0.3-2.git5f2b784.fc22.src.rpm

%changelog
* Tue Jan 27 2015 Sandro Mani manisan...@gmail.com - 0.3-2.git5f2b784
- Bump wireshark version
- Fix License
- Add openambit_strict-aliasing-fixes.patch
- Add openambit_fix-maybe-uninitialized.patch
- Unbundle hidapi

 Is there a reason you are using a github checkout, rather than one of the 
 tarballs at http://openambit.org/downloads/ ?

Yes, various fixes and features which have been added since. Was hoping that a
new official release would pop up in the meantime, but has not happened yet.
Will suggest upstream to release a new version as soon as they merge my two
pending pull requests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957

Jon Ciesla limburg...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186320] Review Request: perl-Apache-Session-LDAP - LDAP implementation of Apache::Session

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186320

David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||dd...@cpan.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dd...@cpan.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1103539] Review Request: drupal7-email - This module provides a field type for email addresses

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103539

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-email-1.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1120867] Review Request: golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics - Go port of Coda Hales Metrics library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120867

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-rcrowley-go-m |golang-github-rcrowley-go-m
   |etrics-0-0.2.gitdee209f.fc2 |etrics-0-0.2.gitdee209f.el6
   |1   |



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-rcrowley-go-metrics-0-0.2.gitdee209f.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185281] Review Request: golang-google-golangorg-cloud - Google Cloud Platform APIs related types and common functions

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185281

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-google-golangorg-cloud-0-0.1.git2e43671.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186497] New: Review Request: libtifiles2 - Texas Instruments calculator files library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186497

Bug ID: 1186497
   Summary: Review Request: libtifiles2 - Texas Instruments
calculator files library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2-1.1.6-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The tifiles library is a library capable of reading, modifying,
and writing TI formatted files. It can also group/ungroup files.
This library is able to manipulate files in a fairly transparent
fashion. With this library, the developer does not have to worry
about the different file formats.
Fedora Account System Username: tc01

A general disclaimer: there's a lot of changelog at the bottom of this spec
file. That's because two years ago (approximately), I was not a sponsored
Fedora packager and the tilp2 software and its libraries were not compliant
with Fedora packaging guidelines. I wrote these spec files and worked with the
maintainers to fix these bugs.

Now that the major problems have been fixed, I'd like to try to actually get
these RPMs into Fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186501] New: Review Request: libticables2 - Texas Instruments link cables library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501

Bug ID: 1186501
   Summary: Review Request: libticables2 - Texas Instruments link
cables library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticables2.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticables2-1.3.4-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The ticables library is able to handle the different link cables
designed for Texas Instruments's graphing calculators (also called
handhelds) in a fairly transparent fashion. With this library, the
developer does not have to worry about the different link cables'
characteristics as well as the different platforms. The library
provides a complete API which is very easy to use and makes things
easier.
Fedora Account System Username: tc01

A general disclaimer: there's a lot of changelog at the bottom of this spec
file. That's because two years ago (approximately), I was not a sponsored
Fedora packager and the tilp2 software and its libraries were not compliant
with Fedora packaging guidelines. I wrote these spec files and worked with the
maintainers to fix these bugs.

Now that the major problems have been fixed, I'd like to try to actually get
these RPMs into Fedora.

For this specific package, I am also not really sure what the right way is to
package udev rules for Fedora; the included libticables rules file was taken
from an Arch AUR pkgbuild.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186503] New: Review Request: openclonk - Fast-paced 2d genre mix

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186503

Bug ID: 1186503
   Summary: Review Request: openclonk - Fast-paced 2d genre mix
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mgans...@alice.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/openclonk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/openclonk-5.5.1-1.fc21.src.rpm

Description: Clonks are witty and nimble human-like creatures.
They build, run, dig and fight: everything in
real-time and in direct control, alone, with or
versus other players.

Fedora Account System Username: martinkg

rpmlint openclonk-5.5.1-1.fc21.x86_64.rpm
openclonk.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary openclonk
openclonk.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary c4group
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

%changelog
* Tue Jan 27 2015 Martin Gansser marti...@fedoraproject.org - 5.5.1-1
- initial build for Fedora 21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183924] Review Request: perl-Time-TAI64 - Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard unix timestamps

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924

David Dick dd...@cpan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from David Dick dd...@cpan.org ---
Thanks for the review Paul.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Time-TAI64
Short Description: Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard
unix timestamps
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Time-TAI64/
Owners: ddick
Branches: f20, f21, el6, epel7
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171303] Review Request: nodejs-upper-case - Upper case a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171303



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-upper-case-1.0.3-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-upper-case-1.0.3-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186494] New: Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494

Bug ID: 1186494
   Summary: Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments
calculators charsets library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticonv.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticonv-1.1.4-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The ticonv library is a library capable of conversions between
Texas Instruments character sets and UTF-8/UTF-16 character sets.
Fedora Account System Username: tc01

A general disclaimer: there's a lot of changelog at the bottom of this spec
file. That's because two years ago (approximately), I was not a sponsored
Fedora packager and the tilp2 software and its libraries were not compliant
with Fedora packaging guidelines. I wrote these spec files and worked with the
maintainers to fix these issues.

Now that the major problems have been fixed, I'd like to try to actually get
these RPMs into Fedora.

rpmlint output:

$ rpmlint SRPMS/libticonv-1.1.4-0.fc21.src.rpm 
libticonv.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) charsets - char sets,
char-sets, charters
libticonv.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ticonv - convict
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/i686/libticonv-1.1.4-0.fc21.i686.rpm 
libticonv.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ticonv - convict
libticonv.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libticonv/html/clean.bat
libticonv.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libticonv/README
libticonv.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libticonv/ChangeLog
libticonv.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libticonv/AUTHORS
libticonv.i686: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/libticonv/html/style.css
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/i686/libticonv-debuginfo-1.1.4-0.fc21.i686.rpm 
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

$ rpmlint RPMS/i686/libticonv-devel-1.1.4-0.fc21.i686.rpm 
libticonv-devel.i686: W: no-documentation
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194

Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Florian der-flo Lehner d...@der-flo.net ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 GPL (v2 or later), GPL (v3 or later), GPL (v3 or later) (with
 incorrect FSF address) LGPL (v3 or later) (with incorrect FSF address).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/man/manx
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/man/manx
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
   --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8740185
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: 

[Bug 1150152] Review Request: rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint - Internal HashiCorp service to check version information

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150152



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint-0.1.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-hashicorp-checkpoint-0.1.4-1.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1103852] Review Request: drupal7-site_map - This module provides a site map that gives visitors an overview of your site

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103852

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
drupal7-site_map-1.2-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185082] Review Request: golang-github-golang-appengine - Go App Engine for Managed VMs

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
Package golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.el6:
* should fix your issue,
* was pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository,
* should be available at your local mirror within two days.
Update it with:
# su -c 'yum update --enablerepo=epel-testing
golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.el6'
as soon as you are able to.
Please go to the following url:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-0471/golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.el6
then log in and leave karma (feedback).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186499] New: Review Request: tfdocgen - TiLP framework documentation generator

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186499

Bug ID: 1186499
   Summary: Review Request: tfdocgen - TiLP framework
documentation generator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/tfdocgen.spec
SRPM URL:
https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/tfdocgen-20131011git-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The tfdocgen program is a program used by the libti*
libraries to generate their HTML documentation from
sources and misc files. You don't need this package
unless you want to develop on the libti*2 libraries.
Fedora Account System Username: tc01

A general disclaimer: there's a lot of changelog at the bottom of this spec
file. That's because two years ago (approximately), I was not a sponsored
Fedora packager and the tilp2 software and its libraries were not compliant
with Fedora packaging guidelines. I wrote these spec files and worked with the
maintainers to fix these bugs.

Now that the major problems have been fixed, I'd like to try to actually get
these RPMs into Fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177009] Review Request: python-tempest-lib - OpenStack Functional Testing Library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177009



--- Comment #12 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Running file on the appropriate file gives:

$ file jquery.js
jquery.js: ASCII text, with very long lines, with CRLF line terminators

Then I launch dos2unix:

$ dos2unix jquery.js
dos2unix: Datei jquery.js wird ins Unix-Format umgewandelt …

And finally I get:

$ file jquery.js
jquery.js: ASCII text, with very long lines


I don't use fedora-review at all. I prefer launching certain commands, I don't
like the automatic way.


I'm a bit confused about the changelog warning:

python-tempest-lib.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.0.2-1
['0.0.4-1.fc22', '0.0.4-1']

This is for the noarch package only, but not for srpm or spec file... Any idea?


Regarding the missing docs for the base package: I had a look at the sources,
and I've found some files which would be worth to be added there. The file
README.rst (now in the -doc subpackage) contains some basic info about the
package and should be moved to that, moreover HACKING.rst, AUTHORS, Changelog
and CONTRIBUTING.rst. Although we have the -doc subpackage, we should also feed
the user with docs without the need to have the -doc package installed. BTW, to
let the docs depend on the base package is unusual:

%package doc
Summary: Documentation for %{name}
Group: Documentation
Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release}

Drop the Requires: line. Imagine, someone is searching for info about
python-tempest-lib, let him be able to install the docs independently from the
package itself. Actually there is no extra requirement to read the docs, just a
text viewer and HTML browser.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1128754] Review Request: mozilla-requestpolicy - Firefox and Seamonkey extension that gives you control over cross-site requests

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
mozilla-requestpolicy-1.0-0.2.20141213gitd27363.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183924] Review Request: perl-Time-TAI64 - Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard unix timestamps

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
rpmlint output
==
perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unix - UNIX, Unix,
uni
perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) timestamps - time
stamps, time-stamps, times tamps
perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamps -
time stamps, time-stamps, times tamps
perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multilog -
multilevel
perl-Time-TAI64.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamp -
time stamp, time-stamp, times tamp
perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) unix - UNIX, Unix, uni
perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) timestamps - time
stamps, time-stamps, times tamps
perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamps - time
stamps, time-stamps, times tamps
perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multilog -
multilevel
perl-Time-TAI64.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US timestamp - time
stamp, time-stamp, times tamp
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.

checklist
=
- rpmlint OK (just spelling complaints about technical terms)
- package and spec file naming OK
- package meets guidelines
- license is same as perl, OK for Fedora, matches upstream
- no license text to include
- spec file written in English and is legible
- source file matches upstream, including timestamp
- package builds OK in mock for Rawhide x86_64, and is not arch-specific
- buildreqs OK
- no locales, libraries etc. to bother with
- no intent to make the package relocatable
- directory ownership and permissions OK
- no duplicate files
- macro usage is consistent
- code, not content
- no large docs, docs don't affect runtime
- not a GUI app, no desktop file needed
- filenames are all ASCII


notes
=
%description needs re-wording to improve English, e.g. s/provides/providing/

Should BR: perl itself, needed to run Makefile.PL


Package APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185082] Review Request: golang-github-golang-appengine - Go App Engine for Managed VMs

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.fc20 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185082] Review Request: golang-github-golang-appengine - Go App Engine for Managed VMs

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183924] Review Request: perl-Time-TAI64 - Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard unix timestamps

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|p...@city-fan.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1179346] Review Request: python-pytest-sourceorder - Test-ordering plugin for pytest

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179346

Petr Viktorin pvikt...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(pviktori@redhat.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #3 from Petr Viktorin pvikt...@redhat.com ---
Oops.

Fixed version:
Spec URL:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/python-pytest-sourceorder.git/plain/python-pytest-sourceorder.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~pviktori/srpms/python-pytest-sourceorder-0.4-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1179350] Review Request: python-pytest-beakerlib - A pytest plugin that reports test results to the BeakerLib framework

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179350



--- Comment #4 from Petr Viktorin pvikt...@redhat.com ---
Oops, forgot to change to %license for both Pythons


Spec URL:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/python-pytest-beakerlib.git/plain/python-pytest-beakerlib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~pviktori/srpms/python-pytest-beakerlib-0.5-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1179336] Review Request: python-pytest-multihost - Utility for writing multi-host tests for pytest

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179336



--- Comment #3 from Petr Viktorin pvikt...@redhat.com ---
Oops, forgot to change the license for both Pythons

SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~pviktori/srpms/python-pytest-multihost-0.6-2.fc21.src.rpm
Spec URL:
https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/python-pytest-multihost.git/plain/python-pytest-multihost.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185963] Review Request: kde-gtk-config - Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963

Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(dvra...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #2 from Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com ---
Spec URL: https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/kde-gtk-config.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dvratil.fedorapeople.org/plasma5/review/kde-gtk-config-5.2.0-2.fc21.src.rpm

* Tue Jan 27 2015 Daniel Vrátil dvra...@redhat.com - 5.2.0-2
- fix license
- remove Obsoletes/Provides kcm-gtk
- remove Requires xsettings-kde

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185082] Review Request: golang-github-golang-appengine - Go App Engine for Managed VMs

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185082



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.el6 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-golang-appengine-0-0.1.git1c3fdc5.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155826] Review Request: libu2f-host - Yubico Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) Host C Library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155826

Till Maas opensou...@till.name changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||opensou...@till.name



--- Comment #12 from Till Maas opensou...@till.name ---
There were several new releases:
https://developers.yubico.com/libu2f-host/Releases/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1174479] Review Request: beets - Music library manager and MusicBrainz tagger

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174479



--- Comment #4 from Michele Baldessari mich...@acksyn.org ---
New upstream:
Spec URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/beets/beets.spec
SRPM URL: http://acksyn.org/files/rpms/beets/beets-1.3.10-1.fc22.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957

Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jstri...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jstri...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Taking for a review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814

Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Test-RequiresInternet
Short Description: Easily test network connectivity
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Test-RequiresInternet/
Owners: pghmcfc
Branches: f20 f21 el6 epel7
InitialCC: perl-sig

Thanks for the review David. Do you have any packages for review at the moment?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185957] Review Request: rubygem-binding_of_caller - Retrieve the binding of a method's caller

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185957

Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Spec looks sane; package builds, installs and runs (needs debug_inspector from
the other review); rpmlint does not complain. == APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171306] Review Request: nodejs-camel-case - Camel case a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171306



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-sentence-case-1.1.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-sentence-case-1.1.0-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171311] Review Request: nodejs-lower-case - Lowercase a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171311



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-lower-case-1.0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-lower-case-1.0.2-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171341] Review Request: nodejs-dot-case - Dot case a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171341



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-dot-case-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-dot-case-1.0.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194



--- Comment #2 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org ---
Thank you very much for the review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171323] Review Request: nodejs-swap-case - Swap the case of a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171323



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-swap-case-1.0.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-swap-case-1.0.2-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171327] Review Request: nodejs-path-case - Path case a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171327



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-path-case-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-path-case-1.0.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194

Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: scamp
Short Description: compute astrometric and photometric solutions from
sextractor catalogs
Upstream URL: http://www.astromatic.net/software/scamp
Owners: lupinix
Branches: f20 f21
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171338] Review Request: nodejs-is-lower-case - Check if a string is lower cased

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171338



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-is-lower-case-1.0.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-is-lower-case-1.0.0-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194

Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1181193 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181193
[Bug 1181193] Review Request: cdsclient - Tools to query databases at CDS
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 866273] Review Request: jaxb2-fluent-api - JAXB2 Commons - Fluent API Plugin

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866273



--- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jaxb2-fluent-api.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jaxb2-fluent-api-3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8742721

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171309] Review Request: nodejs-upper-case-first - Upper case the first character of a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171309



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-upper-case-first-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-upper-case-first-1.0.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1142753] Review Request: python-oslo-serialization - OpenStack oslo.serialization library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142753



--- Comment #8 from John Boero jbo...@redhat.com ---
Or will it only be in EPEL?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171314] Review Request: nodejs-snake-case - Snake case a string

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171314



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-snake-case-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL
7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-snake-case-1.0.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1171336] Review Request: nodejs-is-upper-case - Check if a string is upper cased

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1171336



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
nodejs-is-upper-case-1.0.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-is-upper-case-1.0.1-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1181193] Review Request: cdsclient - Tools to query databases at CDS

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181193

Christian Dersch lupi...@mailbox.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1181194 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194
[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric
solutions
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814

Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.el6 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for
Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1142753] Review Request: python-oslo-serialization - OpenStack oslo.serialization library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142753

John Boero jbo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||jbo...@redhat.com



--- Comment #7 from John Boero jbo...@redhat.com ---
Any idea when this will hit EL7 and/or RHSCL?  It's a dependency for some newer
OpenStack scripts I'm trying to use.  Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1178940] Review Request: libqhyccd - Library to control QHY CCD devices

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178940



--- Comment #7 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
Ups, sorry for the noise. Wolfgang, could you put fedora-review to ?  ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186558] New: Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558

Bug ID: 1186558
   Summary: Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s)
file manipulation program
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/gfm.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/gfm-1.07-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The GFM is an application allowing for the manipulation of
single/group/tigroup files from all Texas Instruments handhelds.
It can create a new file, open an existing file, save file,
rename variables, remove variables, create folders, group files
into a group/tigroup file, and ungroup a group/tigroup file
into single files.
Fedora Account System Username: tc01

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1121601] Review Request: rt - request tracker

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1121601



--- Comment #46 from Jason Tibbitts ti...@math.uh.edu ---
Just wanted to thank you for doing the heavy lifting here.  I'm sorry I didn't
see this ticket much sooner; I only recently had occasion to mess with RT again
and was surprised to find it had dropped out of the distribution.  I guess
there's not any other way I could have known; if you made an announcement on
one of the lists, I didn't see it.

I'll try to find some time soon to test the latest update and give karma.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186557] New: Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557

Bug ID: 1186557
   Summary: Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments
calculator communication library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticalcs2.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libticalcs2-1.1.8-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: The ticalcs library is a library which brings about all the
functions needed to communicate with a Texas Instruments
graphing calculator (or hand-held). Currently, it does not
support some education devices (such as CBL/CBR and others).
This library is able to communicate with handhelds in a fairly
transparent fashion. With this library, the developer does not
have to worry about the packet oriented protocol, the file
management and some other stuff.

Fedora Account System Username: tc01

A general disclaimer: there's a lot of changelog at the bottom of this spec
file. That's because two years ago (approximately), I was not a sponsored
Fedora packager and the tilp2 software and its libraries were not compliant
with Fedora packaging guidelines. I wrote these spec files and worked with the
maintainers to fix these issues.

Now that the major problems have been fixed, I'd like to try to actually get
these RPMs into Fedora.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186560] New: Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s) - PC communication program

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186560

Bug ID: 1186560
   Summary: Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s)
- PC communication program
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rosser@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/tilp2.spec
SRPM URL: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/tilp2-1.17-0.fc21.src.rpm
Description: TiLP2 is a Texas Instruments handhelds - PC communication
program for Linux. It is able to use any type of link cable
(Gray/Black/Silver/Direct Link) with any calculator. See
http://lpg.ticalc.org/.

With TiLP, you can transfer files from your PC to your Texas
Instruments calculator, and vice-versa. You can also make a
screen dump, send/receive data, backup/restore contents,
install FLASH applications, or upgrade the  OS.

Fedora Account System Username: tc01

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155055] Review Request: jenkins-pam-auth-plugin - Jenkins PAM Authentication plugin

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155055

Michael Simacek msima...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||msima...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msima...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186351] Review Request: rubygem-web-console - A set of debugging tools for your Rails application

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186351

Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jstri...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jstri...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Josef Stribny jstri...@redhat.com ---
Taking.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1020456] Review Request: vagrant - an automation tool used to manage development environments

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020456



--- Comment #47 from Michael Adam ma...@redhat.com ---
(In reply to Aleksandar Kostadinov from comment #46)
 @Michael, did you file a formal request somewhere I can monitor? I'm
 referring to comment 44.

@Aleksander: No, not yet. Should I do that?
And how?

I was told I should just follow the Guidlines here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests
and these simply manage the package change request
for adding a package to more versions.

Thanks for clarification and please ignore my ignorance,
I am still somewhat new to the process... 

Michael

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 - OAuth 2.0 for Go clients

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.fc21 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 - OAuth 2.0 for Go clients

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.fc20 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141822] Review Request: golang-googlecode-goauth2 - OAuth 2.0 for Go clients

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141822



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.el6 has been submitted as an update
for Fedora EPEL 6.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-googlecode-goauth2-0-0.5.hg267028f.el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185932] Review Request: osgi-annotation - Annotations for use in compiling OSGi bundles

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185932

Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-01-27 10:04:29



--- Comment #9 from Mat Booth mat.bo...@redhat.com ---
Built for all requested branches:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=606920

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1179336] Review Request: python-pytest-multihost - Utility for writing multi-host tests for pytest

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179336

Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com ---
Review approved

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1179346] Review Request: python-pytest-sourceorder - Test-ordering plugin for pytest

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1179346

Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sgall...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com ---
Review approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in
  the spec URL.
  Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /dev/shm/1179346-python-
  pytest-sourceorder/diff.txt
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
  its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
  package is included in %doc.
  Note: Cannot find COPYING in rpm(s)
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text


= MUST items =

Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 Unknown or generated. 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /dev/shm/1179346-python-pytest-
 sourceorder/licensecheck.txt
[X]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[X]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[X]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[X]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[X]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python3
 -pytest-sourceorder
[?]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: 

[Bug 1173683] Review Request: pg-semver - A semantic version data type for PostgreSQL

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173683

Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(rma...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #11 from Richard Marko rma...@redhat.com ---
Thanks for the reminder. Builds pushed to stable and added to monitoring.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 905240] Review Request: rubygem-log4r - Comprehensive and flexible logging library for ruby

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=905240



--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
rubygem-log4r-1.1.10-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/rubygem-log4r-1.1.10-2.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1185509] Review Request: python-photutils - Astropy affiliated package for image photometry tasks

2015-01-27 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185509

Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Sergio Pascual sergio.pa...@gmail.com ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-photutils
Short Description: Astropy affiliated package for image photometry tasks
Upstream URL: http://photutils.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
Owners: sergiopr
Branches: f21
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

  1   2   >