[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #22 from Carlos Morel-Riquelme --- Hi mohammed The fedora-review give me again the warning of documentation Rpmlint --- Checking: layla-koufi-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-thuluth-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-boxer-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-ruqaa-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-basic-arabic-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-fonts-common-1.3-1.fc22.noarch.rpm layla-fonts-1.3-1.fc22.src.rpm layla-koufi-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation layla-thuluth-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation layla-boxer-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation layla-ruqaa-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation layla-basic-arabic-fonts.noarch: W: no-documentation 7 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 5 warnings. Here is the tree of the layla-fonts in the srpm [empateinfinito@localhost layla-fonts-1.3]$ tree . ├── Authors ├── ChangeLog ├── confs │ ├── 67-layla-BasicArabic.conf │ ├── 67-layla-Boxer.conf │ ├── 67-layla-Koufi.conf │ ├── 67-layla-Ruqaa.conf │ └── 67-layla-Thuluth.conf ├── COPYING ├── GPL.txt ├── LaylaBasicArabic.ttf ├── LaylaBoxer.ttf ├── layla-fonts-1.3.tar.gz ├── LaylaKoufi.ttf ├── LaylaRuqaa.ttf ├── LaylaThuluth.ttf └── README 1 directory, 16 files [empateinfinito@localhost layla-fonts-1.3]$ 1) It's strange because the documentation is here :/ 2) layla-fonts-1.3.tar.gz is void ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190060] Review Request: tanglet - Word finding game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190060 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Taking this… =) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093 --- Comment #9 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8) > qtile.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtile-session > qtile.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtile-run > > ---> Ignored. > > Hint: You can use help2man to generate some nice manpages if there's some > useful output for the --help or -h parameter option. But that is not a must. > Some samples could be found in my packages ;) > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/486 I intentionally ignored the absence of man-pages in this review run… There are real errors to fix in the spec-file. Creating man-pages with `help2man` is bonus-score, when everything else is fine and compliant to the guidelines. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141494] Review Request: python-flask-whooshalchemy - Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494 --- Comment #20 from Eduardo Echeverria --- btw consider make a build scratch before upload your SRPM, this would help you see this issues and fix them. if still you don't know what is a scratch build. take a look at. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_the_Koji_build_system#Scratch_Builds -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141494] Review Request: python-flask-whooshalchemy - Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494 --- Comment #19 from Eduardo Echeverria --- Another issue: I'm not sure if Whoosh == 2.5.7 could work fine with Flask-WhooshAlchemy, would be great if you can test it or ask to upstream. or simply ask to the maintainer (rkuska)for update the package. ➜ Flask-WhooshAlchemy-b0207cc23bc6f7f511e710b3e47e7273a3ff4074 cat requirements.txt Flask==0.10.1 Flask-SQLAlchemy==1.0 => Whoosh==2.6.0 blinker==1.3 ➜ ~ yum info python-whoosh --enablerepo=rawhide Complementos cargados:langpacks Paquetes disponibles Nombre: python-whoosh Arquitectura: noarch => Versión : 2.5.7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855192] Review Request: felix-fileinstall - A utility to automatically install bundles from a directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977017] Review Request: dozer - Java Bean to Java Bean mapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875676] Review Request: pax-web - OPS4J Pax Web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875676 Bug 875676 depends on bug 855192, which changed state. Bug 855192 Summary: Review Request: felix-fileinstall - A utility to automatically install bundles from a directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186345] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go wrapper for RocksDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-influxdb-rock |golang-github-influxdb-rock |sdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc21 |sdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968136] Review Request: camel - Apache Camel integration framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136 Bug 968136 depends on bug 855192, which changed state. Bug 855192 Summary: Review Request: felix-fileinstall - A utility to automatically install bundles from a directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 855192] Review Request: felix-fileinstall - A utility to automatically install bundles from a directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||felix-fileinstall-3.4.0-3.f ||c21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:05:03 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- felix-fileinstall-3.4.0-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 875692] Review Request: karaf - A lightweight OSGi based run-time
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875692 Bug 875692 depends on bug 855192, which changed state. Bug 855192 Summary: Review Request: felix-fileinstall - A utility to automatically install bundles from a directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=855192 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 904634] Review Request: mingw-sword - MinGW build of a cross-platform scripture text library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=904634 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||mingw-sword-1.7.4-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:04:24 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- mingw-sword-1.7.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 866273] Review Request: jaxb2-fluent-api - JAXB2 Commons - Fluent API Plugin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866273 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||jaxb2-fluent-api-3.0-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:03:43 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jaxb2-fluent-api-3.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968136] Review Request: camel - Apache Camel integration framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136 Bug 968136 depends on bug 866273, which changed state. Bug 866273 Summary: Review Request: jaxb2-fluent-api - JAXB2 Commons - Fluent API Plugin https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=866273 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1183924] Review Request: perl-Time-TAI64 - Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard unix timestamps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Time-TAI64-2.11-1.fc20 |perl-Time-TAI64-2.11-1.fc21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-TAI64-2.11-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186346] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go - Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-influxdb-hype |golang-github-influxdb-hype |rleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de9 |rleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de9 |4.fc21 |4.fc20 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1183924] Review Request: perl-Time-TAI64 - Perl extension for converting TAI64 strings into standard unix timestamps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Time-TAI64-2.11-1.fc20 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:02:41 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Time-TAI64-2.11-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|scamp-2.0.4-1.fc21 |scamp-2.0.4-1.fc20 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- scamp-2.0.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085840] Review Request: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient - Go Client for the Docker remote API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |kerclient-0.2.1-4.git0758f4 |kerclient-0.2.1-4.git0758f4 |0.fc20 |0.fc21 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0.2.1-4.git0758f40.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149410] Review Request: rubygem-aws-sdk-core - AWS SDK for Ruby - Core
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149410 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-aws-sdk-core-2.0.22-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 977017] Review Request: dozer - Java Bean to Java Bean mapper
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||dozer-5.5.1-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:00:39 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- dozer-5.5.1-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186345] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb - Go wrapper for RocksDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186345 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-influxdb-rock ||sdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 23:00:46 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-influxdb-rocksdb-0-0.1.git7adff3e.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968136] Review Request: camel - Apache Camel integration framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136 Bug 968136 depends on bug 977017, which changed state. Bug 977017 Summary: Review Request: dozer - Java Bean to Java Bean mapper https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977017 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186320] Review Request: perl-Apache-Session-LDAP - LDAP implementation of Apache::Session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186320 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Apache-Session-LDAP-0.3-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085840] Review Request: golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient - Go Client for the Docker remote API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085840 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |golang-github-fsouza-go-doc |kerclient-0.2.1-3.gitb52383 |kerclient-0.2.1-4.git0758f4 |4.el6 |0.fc20 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient-0.2.1-4.git0758f40.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144803] Review Request: globus-xio-udt-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO UDT Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc20, globus-common-15.27-2.fc20, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc20, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc20, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc20, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc20, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc20, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc20, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc20, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc20, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc20, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc20, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc20, globus-io-11.3-1.fc20, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc20, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc20, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc20, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc20, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc20, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc20, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc20, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc20, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144801] Review Request: globus-xio-gridftp-multicast - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GridFTP Multicast Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc20, globus-common-15.27-2.fc20, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc20, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc20, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc20, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc20, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc20, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc20, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc20, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc20, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc20, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc20, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc20, globus-io-11.3-1.fc20, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc20, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc20, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc20, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc20, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc20, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc20, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc20, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc20, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185582] Review Request: openambit - Open software for the Suunto Ambit(2)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185582 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||openambit-0.3-2.git5f2b784. ||fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:57:53 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- openambit-0.3-2.git5f2b784.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144802] Review Request: globus-xio-rate-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Rate Limiting Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc20, globus-common-15.27-2.fc20, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc20, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc20, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc20, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc20, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc20, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc20, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc20, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc20, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc20, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc20, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc20, globus-io-11.3-1.fc20, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc20, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc20, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc20, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc20, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc20, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc20, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc20, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc20, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1181194] Review Request: scamp - compute astrometric and photometric solutions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181194 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||scamp-2.0.4-1.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:58:12 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- scamp-2.0.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1181118] Review Request: globus-net-manager - Globus Toolkit - Globus Network Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc20, globus-common-15.27-2.fc20, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc20, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc20, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc20, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc20, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc20, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc20, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc20, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc20, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc20, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc20, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc20, globus-io-11.3-1.fc20, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc20, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc20, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc20, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc20, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc20, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc20, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc20, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc20, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186320] Review Request: perl-Apache-Session-LDAP - LDAP implementation of Apache::Session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186320 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Apache-Session-LDAP-0.3-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144800] Review Request: globus-gridmap-eppn-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus gridmap ePPN callout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21|globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc20, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc20, globus-common-15.27-2.fc20, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc20, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc20, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc20, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc20, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc20, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc20, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc20, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc20, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc20, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc20, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc20, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc20, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc20, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc20, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc20, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc20, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc20, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc20, globus-io-11.3-1.fc20, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc20, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc20, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc20, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc20, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc20, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc20, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc20, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc20, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc20, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc20, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc20, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc20, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144802] Review Request: globus-xio-rate-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO Rate Limiting Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144802 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:37 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc21, globus-common-15.27-2.fc21, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc21, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc21, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc21, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc21, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc21, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc21, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc21, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc21, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc21, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc21, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc21, globus-io-11.3-1.fc21, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc21, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc21, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc21, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc21, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc21, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc21, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc21, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc21, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1181118] Review Request: globus-net-manager - Globus Toolkit - Globus Network Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181118 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:41 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc21, globus-common-15.27-2.fc21, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc21, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc21, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc21, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc21, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc21, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc21, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc21, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc21, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc21, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc21, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc21, globus-io-11.3-1.fc21, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc21, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc21, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc21, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc21, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc21, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc21, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc21, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc21, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144803] Review Request: globus-xio-udt-driver - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO UDT Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144803 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:39 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc21, globus-common-15.27-2.fc21, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc21, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc21, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc21, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc21, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc21, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc21, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc21, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc21, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc21, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc21, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc21, globus-io-11.3-1.fc21, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc21, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc21, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc21, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc21, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc21, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc21, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc21, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc21, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144800] Review Request: globus-gridmap-eppn-callout - Globus Toolkit - Globus gridmap ePPN callout
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144800 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:32 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc21, globus-common-15.27-2.fc21, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc21, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc21, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc21, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc21, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc21, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc21, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc21, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc21, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc21, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc21, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc21, globus-io-11.3-1.fc21, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc21, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc21, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc21, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc21, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc21, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc21, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc21, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc21, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1144801] Review Request: globus-xio-gridftp-multicast - Globus Toolkit - Globus XIO GridFTP Multicast Driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1144801 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:35 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- globus-authz-3.10-2.fc21, globus-authz-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-callout-3.13-2.fc21, globus-common-15.27-2.fc21, globus-ftp-client-8.17-2.fc21, globus-ftp-control-6.6-1.fc21, globus-gass-cache-9.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-cache-program-6.5-2.fc21, globus-gass-copy-9.13-2.fc21, globus-gass-server-ez-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gass-transfer-8.8-2.fc21, globus-gatekeeper-10.9-2.fc21, globus-gfork-4.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-audit-4.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-client-13.12-1.fc21, globus-gram-client-tools-11.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-14.25-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-callout-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-condor-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-fork-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-lsf-2.6-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-pbs-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-scripts-6.7-2.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-sge-2.5-1.fc21, globus-gram-job-manager-slurm-2.5-2.fc21, globus-gram-protocol-12.12-3.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-7.20-1.fc21, globus-gridftp-server-control-3.6-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-callout-error-2.4-2.fc21, globus-gridmap-eppn-callout-1.7-3.fc21, globus-gridmap-verify-myproxy-callout-2.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-callback-5.6-2.fc21, globus-gsi-cert-utils-9.10-2.fc21, globus-gsi-credential-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-openssl-error-3.5-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-core-7.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-proxy-ssl-5.7-2.fc21, globus-gsi-sysconfig-6.8-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-error-5.4-2.fc21, globus-gssapi-gsi-11.14-2.fc21, globus-gss-assist-10.13-2.fc21, globus-io-11.3-1.fc21, globus-net-manager-0.6-2.fc21, globus-openssl-module-4.6-2.fc21, globus-proxy-utils-6.9-2.fc21, globus-rsl-10.9-2.fc21, globus-scheduler-event-generator-5.10-1.fc21, globus-simple-ca-4.18-2.fc21, globus-usage-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-5.4-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-driver-2.10-1.fc21, globus-xio-gridftp-multicast-1.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-gsi-driver-3.6-2.fc21, globus-xioperf-4.4-2.fc21, globus-xio-pipe-driver-3.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-popen-driver-3.5-2.fc21, globus-xio-rate-driver-1.7-2.fc21, globus-xio-udt-driver-1.16-2.fc21, myproxy-6.1.12-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186346] Review Request: golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go - Go wrapper for HyperLevelDB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186346 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||golang-github-influxdb-hype ||rleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de9 ||4.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:53:46 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-influxdb-hyperleveldb-go-0-0.1.gite24de94.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185814] Review Request: perl-Test-RequiresInternet - Easily test network connectivity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185814 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-RequiresInternet-0.03-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 968136] Review Request: camel - Apache Camel integration framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=968136 Bug 968136 depends on bug 974756, which changed state. Bug 974756 Summary: Review Request: flatpack - Flat File Parser via XML Mappings (fixed length,CSV) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 974756] Review Request: flatpack - Flat File Parser via XML Mappings (fixed length,CSV)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974756 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||flatpack-4.0.0-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:54:10 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- flatpack-4.0.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149212] Review Request: springframework-plugin - Simple plugin infrastructure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149212 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||springframework-plugin-1.1. ||0-2.fc21 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-02-06 22:53:33 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- springframework-plugin-1.1.0-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178149] Review Request: springframework-hateoas - Library to support implementing representations for hyper-text driven REST web services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178149 Bug 1178149 depends on bug 1149212, which changed state. Bug 1149212 Summary: Review Request: springframework-plugin - Simple plugin infrastructure https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149212 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1049076] Review Request: google-android-emoji-fonts - Android Emoji font released by Google
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1049076 Bryan Yount changed: What|Removed |Added CC||byo...@redhat.com --- Comment #18 from Bryan Yount --- Is it possible to get this font (or the discussed upstream replacement) included in a default Desktop install of Fedora? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1187869] Review Request: kdocker - Dock any application in the system tray
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869
--- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann ---
%{_qt4_qmake}
This expands to:
$ rpm --eval %{_qt4_qmake}
/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake
It calls the appropriate binary only. Have a look at a similar macro:
$ rpm --eval %{qmake_qt4}
/usr/lib64/qt4/bin/qmake \
QMAKE_CFLAGS_DEBUG="${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic}" \
QMAKE_CFLAGS_RELEASE="${CFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic}" \
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_DEBUG="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security
-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong
--param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64 -mtune=generic}" \
QMAKE_CXXFLAGS_RELEASE="${CXXFLAGS:--O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64
-mtune=generic}" \
QMAKE_LFLAGS_DEBUG="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }" \
QMAKE_LFLAGS_RELEASE="${LDFLAGS:--Wl,-z,relro }" \
QMAKE_STRIP=
That one makes sure that qmake is always called with sufficient and correct
options.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161965] Review Request: python-honcho - Python clone of Foreman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161965 William Moreno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #6 from William Moreno --- == Thanks for the review! == -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161965] Review Request: python-honcho - Python clone of Foreman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161965 --- Comment #7 from William Moreno --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-honcho - Short Description: Python clone of Foreman Upstream URL: https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho Owners: williamjmorenor Branches: f21 master InitialCC: williamjmorenor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1187869] Review Request: kdocker - Dock any application in the system tray
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187869 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added External Bug ID||Launchpad 1419170 --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Reported about incorrect-fsf-address to upstream: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdocker/+bug/1419170 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161965] Review Request: python-honcho - Python clone of Foreman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161965
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann ---
Scratch build:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8851724
$ rpmlint -i -v *
python-honcho.noarch: I: checking
python-honcho.noarch: I: checking-url https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-honcho.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary honcho
Each executable in standard binary directories should have a man page.
python-honcho.src: I: checking
python-honcho.src: I: checking-url https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho
(timeout 10 seconds)
python-honcho.src: I: checking-url
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/h/honcho/honcho-0.5.0.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
python-honcho.spec: I: checking
python-honcho.spec: I: checking-url
https://pypi.python.org/packages/source/h/honcho/honcho-0.5.0.tar.gz (timeout
10 seconds)
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
OK so far.
-
key:
[+] OK
[.] OK, not applicable
[X] needs work
-
[+] MUST: rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[+] MUST: The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[+] MUST: The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet
the Licensing Guidelines.
[+] MUST: The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
MIT
[.] MUST: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package must be included in %license.
[+] MUST: The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] MUST: The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[+] MUST: The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source,
as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it
is used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
$ sha256sum *
623fe325939219f61b41ab6124c57f4960ce4f486516846aaaf7d4775d2a2eda
honcho-0.5.0.tar.gz
623fe325939219f61b41ab6124c57f4960ce4f486516846aaaf7d4775d2a2eda
honcho-0.5.0.tar.gz.orig
[+] MUST: The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on
at least one primary architecture.
[.] MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[+] MUST: All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[.] MUST: The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[.] MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[.] MUST: Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[.] MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker.
[+] MUST: A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not
create a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does
create that directory.
[+] MUST: A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific
situations)
[+] MUST: Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set
with executable permissions, for example.
[+] MUST: Each package must consistently use macros.
[+] MUST: The package must contain code, or permissable content.
[.] MUST: Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not
restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or quantity).
[+] MUST: If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #23 from Pranav Kant --- Another informal review : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185550 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185550] Review Request: anything-sync-daemon - Offload any directories to RAM for speed and wear reduction
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185550
Pranav Kant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pranav...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Pranav Kant ---
This is an unofficial review only.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues ==
As the spec file is adapted from a similar project already in fedora
repository, as expected, the spec file is almost clean.
There is only thing that has changed since then. Just move the MIT file from
%doc to %license and I think it is fine.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[!]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required i
[Bug 1177019] Review Request: os-net-config - Host network configuration tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177019 Ben Nemec changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(bne...@redhat.com | |) | --- Comment #3 from Ben Nemec --- Thanks for the reviews guys. https://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/os-net-config.spec https://fedorapeople.org/~bnemec/os-net-config-0.1.1-2.fc21.src.rpm -Removed unnecessary systemd requires -Fixed tab/spaces mismatch -Build and include docs in the package -Removed the delorean changelog entry I did not remove the egg-info files because none of our other OpenStack packages seem to be doing that and we appear to be regenerating them at build time anyway. Also, I think the prohibition around egg files is for egg packages, whereas we've just got egg metadata. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159 --- Comment #27 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Spec URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml.spec SRPM URL: http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/fedora/libsbml-5.11.0-10.fc22.src.rpm It seems that the java build is broken. Antonio had a comment about that in his spec, which I removed because the parallel build seemed to work. I made it serial again for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #22 from Pranav Kant --- More informal reviews: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084 Please review my reviews. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082
Pranav Kant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pranav...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Pranav Kant ---
This is an unofficial review.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package doesn't contain BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
You must be more specific about the python version when defining BR.
- defattr is not needed in %files.
- Maybe put PKG-INFO in %doc ?
- Use versioned python macros. Unversioned macros are deprecated.
- Probably %prep need to remove egg-info.
- You should add egg-info files in %files.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Test run failed
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
Python:
[!]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
[?]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[?]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
Please see issues above.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[?]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to p
[Bug 1187084] Review Request: electrum - a lightweight Bitcoin client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187084
Pranav Kant changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pranav...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Pranav Kant ---
This is an unofficial review only.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
Your package contains only python-devel. If you need both python2, python3,
you need to add both of these as separate BRs, otherwise only add one of
these.
- Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
Please don't use a mixture of macro style and variable style. Keep it
consistent throughout the spec file.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#macros
- Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
Your package includes electrum.desktop file but doesn't use
desktop-file-install to install this desktop file. Also add a BR:
desktop-file-utils for this.
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#desktop-file-install_usage
- update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains
desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
Since, this package involves a desktop file, you probably need to add these
sections.
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
database
- Use %license and move LICENSE file from %doc to %license.
See :
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Use_license_macro_in_RPMs_for_packages_in_Cloud_Image
- You need to change %{__python} macro to specifically %{__python2} or 3 in
your
spec file. Unversioned python macros are deprecated.
- Use versioned python_sitelib in %files instead of unversioned
%{__python_sitelib}
- Your package doesn't include the *.egg-info in %files.
- Binary eggs must be removed in %prep probably.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Licenses found:
"Apache (v2.0)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
(BSD like)", "BSD (2 clause)", "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)". 44
files have unknown license.
Please make sure that you mention all of these licenses in License field
in
spec file or put an *effective* license in that field.
[?]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/ar_SA/LC_MESSAGES,
/usr/share/locale/eo_UY/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ky_KG,
/usr/share/locale/eo_UY, /usr/share/locale/ky_KG/LC_MESSAGES,
/usr/share/locale/ar_SA
[?]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners:
/usr/share/locale/eo_UY/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/eo_UY,
/usr/share/locale/ar_SA, /usr/share/locale/ky_KG,
/usr/share/locale/ky_KG/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ar_SA/LC_MESSAGES
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
You use macros at most of the places but there is still some scope. You
can
use %{name} when installing binaries and other files in %{datadir}.
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
This doesn't have large documentation.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package does not own files or direct
[Bug 1128841] Review Request: openmortal - Parody of an once popular coin-up fighting game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128841 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|700095 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=700095 [Bug 700095] remove incorrect fsf address or switch from error to warning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1156659] Review Request: indi-sx - INDI driver providing support for Starlight Xpress devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156659 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #950710|review? | Flags|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190269] New: Review Request: openstack-barbican - Secrets as a Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190269 Bug ID: 1190269 Summary: Review Request: openstack-barbican - Secrets as a Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: gregsw...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican.spec SRPM URL: http://nytefyre.net/rpms/openstack-barbican-2015.1-1.0b2.fc21.src.rpm Description: I'm an engineer on a team close to the Barbican dev group at Rackspace. I've been pushing to get it packaged and pushable into Fedora, and so here it is. For all of its dependencies to be met it only builds in fc22. fc21 is missing python-keystonemiddleware iirc. The kilo release and FC22 seem to be targetted around the same time for release, this is the kilo-2 release candidate. K-3 (final rc) should be cut before the FC22 feature freeze. Barbican is a ReST API designed for the secure storage, provisioning and management of secrets. It is aimed at being useful for all environments, including large ephemeral Clouds. Fedora Account System Username: xaeth -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner --- qtile.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtile-session qtile.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary qtile-run ---> Ignored. Hint: You can use help2man to generate some nice manpages if there's some useful output for the --help or -h parameter option. But that is not a must. Some samples could be found in my packages ;) https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/486 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186499] Review Request: tfdocgen - TiLP framework documentation generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186499 --- Comment #5 from Mario Blättermann --- BTW, ChangeLog is still missing from %doc. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186499] Review Request: tfdocgen - TiLP framework documentation generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186499
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Alias||tfdocgen
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Mario Blättermann ---
%{_mandir}/man1/tfdocgen.1.gz
Please use no certain ending for the compression algorithm. Use a wildcard
instead, then it is future-proof (default compression can change in the
future):
%{_mandir}/man1/tfdocgen.1.*
License files go into %license according to the latest guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188537] Review Request: rubygem-byebug - Ruby 2.0 fast debugger - base + CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188537 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-02-06 13:25:25 --- Comment #4 from Mamoru TASAKA --- simplecov BR dependency removed. Built successfully on F-22/21, push request for F-21 on bodhi, closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188537] Review Request: rubygem-byebug - Ruby 2.0 fast debugger - base + CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188537 Bug 1188537 depends on bug 1188536, which changed state. Bug 1188536 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-debugger-linecache - Read file with caching https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188536 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188536] Review Request: rubygem-debugger-linecache - Read file with caching
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188536 Mamoru TASAKA changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-02-06 13:24:26 --- Comment #8 from Mamoru TASAKA --- License issue is reported upstream, built successfully on F-22/21, push request for F-21 on bodhi, closing. Thank you for review and git procedure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #21 from Pranav Kant --- Sorry, I was a bit loose this time doing reviews. Will let you know of other informal reviews I make as soon as I get time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1186494 |1186501 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494 [Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501 [Bug 1186501] Review Request: libticables2 - Texas Instruments link cables library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1186557 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186501] Review Request: libticables2 - Texas Instruments link cables library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186501 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1186557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1186557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1186558 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 [Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1186557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1186558 | Depends On||1186494 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494 [Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 [Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1186557 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1186558 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 [Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186558] Review Request: gfm - Texas Instruments handheld(s) file manipulation program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186558 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1186557 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186557 [Bug 1186557] Review Request: libticalcs2 - Texas Instruments calculator communication library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #21 from Mohammed Isam --- NB: I had to bump the NVR as I removed the info & mans from the source pkg. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #20 from Mohammed Isam --- Spec URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts.spec SRPM URL: http://sites.google.com/site/mohammedisam2000/home/projects/layla-fonts-1.3-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #19 from Mohammed Isam --- (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #18) > The problem is that the manpages aren't packaged by %_font_pkg but are > listed in the %files sections. I would suggest dropping both the man and > info pages as they're really not necessary for a font. I checked a couple > of other Fedora fonts and they don't contain man or info pages. > > If you remove the man and info pages, then you can also remove all of the > %files sections except -common Ok. I removed the man pages & the info files. Links are updated accordingly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085890] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-pflag - Replacement for Go's flag package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.el6 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 6. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.el6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085890] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-pflag - Replacement for Go's flag package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1122176] Review Request: kubernetes - Kubernetes container management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1122176 --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kubernetes-0.9.1-0.2.git3623a01.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085890] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-pflag - Replacement for Go's flag package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189611] Review Request: fedpkg-minimal - Script to allow fedpkg fetch to work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189611 --- Comment #2 from Pavol Babinčák --- (In reply to Mathieu Bridon from comment #1) > [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %doc. > > => You could use the %license tag instead of %doc for the LICENSE file. > >I won't block the review on this though, you can just change it when >you import the package. ;) Fixed as suggested. > > [!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. > > => Please use "install -p" to install the files Fixed as suggested. > > [!] You're installing the README.md and LICENSE files twice: > - once in %install > - once by using the %doc macro on the file in the build dir > > Just drop the one from %install. Fixed as suggested. > [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > > => As we just discussed, curl is already in the minimal buildroot (it's a >dependency of rpm) but wget isn't, so for its intended purpose if > would >be better to have fepdkg-minimal depend on curl. > >That's certainly not a blocker for this review, though. Will be fixed in next upstream release. Updated spec URL: https://pbabinca.fedorapeople.org/fedpkg-minimal/fedpkg-minimal.spec Updated SRPM URL: https://pbabinca.fedorapeople.org/fedpkg-minimal/fedpkg-minimal-1.0.0-2.fc22.src.rpm Previously submitted spec and SRPM can be found here: https://pbabinca.fedorapeople.org/fedpkg-minimal/previous-2015-02-05/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1188537] Review Request: rubygem-byebug - Ruby 2.0 fast debugger - base + CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188537 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 --- Comment #49 from Jon Ciesla --- Done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 457213] Review Request: html2text - HTML-to-text converter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=457213 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 427411] Review Request: common-lisp-controller - Common Lisp source and compiler manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427411 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090 --- Comment #18 from Jonathan Dieter --- (In reply to Mohammed Isam from comment #16) > (In reply to Jonathan Dieter from comment #14) > > Mohammad, the problem is that the spec link still points to the old spec > > file. I've downloaded the srpm and run some preliminary checks. Thanks for > > fixing the items Carlos listed, but you also have %files being listed twice > > for each subpackage because %_font_pkg automatically creates a %files > > section for a font. > > Hi Jonathan > I am a little perplexed here. If I remove the %files sections, rpmbuild > complains about finding (Installed but unpackaged files) and terminates in > error. Still, it is working with the current spec file, how is it possible? > Furthermore, when I run (rpm -qpl) on the font packages, it lists the files > correctly (with no repeated files). Should I remove the %files sections from > my spec? If yes, how to solve the rpmbuild panic error? The problem is that the manpages aren't packaged by %_font_pkg but are listed in the %files sections. I would suggest dropping both the man and info pages as they're really not necessary for a font. I checked a couple of other Fedora fonts and they don't contain man or info pages. If you remove the man and info pages, then you can also remove all of the %files sections except -common -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186497] Review Request: libtifiles2 - Texas Instruments calculator files library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186497
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co
||m
Depends On||1186494
--- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann ---
%lang(fr) %{_datadir}/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/libtifiles2.mo
Instead of adding the translation files manually (even when it is only one
file) you have to use the find_lang macro:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Handling_Locale_Files
BuildRequires: libticonv-devel
This is unresolvable. This package is only available from CalcForge:
http://repo.calcforge.org/fedora/21/SRPMS/repoview/libticonv.html
Well, it is currently under review for official inclusion, that's why I add
that review ticket as a blocker.
The other dependency (tfdocgen) has already been added as a blocker for
libticonv.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494
[Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators
charsets library
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186494] Review Request: libticonv - Texas Instruments calculators charsets library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186494 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1186497 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186497 [Bug 1186497] Review Request: libtifiles2 - Texas Instruments calculator files library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1080411] Review Request: trojita - Qt IMAP e-mail client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1080411 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bjoern.es...@gmail.com Assignee|i...@cicku.me |bjoern.es...@gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(i...@cicku.me) | --- Comment #20 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Taking over here… -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1187337] Review Request: coval-fonts - font derived from sans-serif
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187337 --- Comment #11 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Just realized this font fits in fontconfig priority level 61-64. Other existing oflb LGC fonts are at 63 level. Choose 61 or higher maybe 63. │ 61-64 │ Low priority LGC fonts │ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190046] Review Request: averia-fonts - non-commercial font with OFL license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190046 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Just realized this font fits in fontconfig priority level 61-64. Other existing oflb LGC fonts are at 63 level. Choose 61 or higher maybe 63. │ 61-64 │ Low priority LGC fonts │ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1190048] Review Request: pecita-fonts - non-commercial font with OFL license
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190048 --- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Just realized this font fits in fontconfig priority level 61-64. Other existing oflb LGC fonts are at 63 level. Choose 61 or higher maybe 63. │ 61-64 │ Low priority LGC fonts │ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
