[Bug 1188530] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock - DocBlock parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock-2.0.4-1.fc21 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock-2.0.4-1.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188530] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock - DocBlock parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock-2.0.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora EPEL 7.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock-2.0.4-1.el7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188530] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock - DocBlock parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195058] Review Request: php-kolab-net-ldap3 - Advanced functionality for accessing LDAP directories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195058



--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet  ---
Probably "composer.json" is not as much as strict as it should be ;)

From the file header:
 | Licensed under the GNU General Public License version 3 or|
 | any later version with exceptions for plugins.|

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155376] Review Request: rnetclient - Program to submit the Brazilian Tax Report

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155376



--- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) 
 ---
> %install
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT

You may drop the "rm -rf ..." line here:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195054] Review Request: php-pear-Net-LDAP2 - Object oriented interface for searching and manipulating LDAP-entries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195054

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #3 from Remi Collet  ---
Thanks for the review

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-pear-Net-LDAP2
Short Description: Object oriented interface for searching and manipulating
LDAP-entries
Upstream URL: http://pear.php.net/package/Net_LDAP2
Owners: remi
Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093

John Dulaney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RELEASE_PENDING



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093

John Dulaney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|RELEASE_PENDING |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2015-02-24 01:43:23



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195573] Review Request: dropbox-api-command - Dropbox API wrapper command

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||perl-devel@lists.fedoraproj
   ||ect.org
  Alias||dropbox-api-command



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9048548

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195573] New: Review Request: dropbox-api-command - Dropbox API wrapper command

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195573

Bug ID: 1195573
   Summary: Review Request: dropbox-api-command - Dropbox API
wrapper command
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//dropbox-api-command.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//dropbox-api-command-1.17-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
Dropbox API wrapper command.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 974725] Review Request: ghc-pretty-show - Tools for working with derived Show instances and generic inspection of values

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974725

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(maths...@gmail.co |
   |m)  |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 974725] Review Request: ghc-pretty-show - Tools for working with derived Show instances and generic inspection of values

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974725



--- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-pretty-show.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-pretty-show-1.6.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Scratch: ghc-pretty-show-1.6.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Scratch build is *slightly* different; just missing the Requires on js-jquery1
(which shouldn't affect the build).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195557] Review Request: ghc-Decimal - Decimal numbers with variable precision

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195557

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-Decimal



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9047786

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195557] New: Review Request: ghc-Decimal - Decimal numbers with variable precision

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195557

Bug ID: 1195557
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-Decimal - Decimal numbers with
variable precision
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-Decimal.spec
SRPM URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-Decimal-0.4.2-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
A decimal number has an integer mantissa and a negative exponent. The exponent
can be interpreted as the number of decimal places in the value.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195557] Review Request: ghc-Decimal - Decimal numbers with variable precision

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195557

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1142913




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142913
[Bug 1142913] ghc-hledger-lib-0.24 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 974725] Review Request: ghc-pretty-show - Tools for working with derived Show instances and generic inspection of values

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=974725

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1142913




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142913
[Bug 1142913] ghc-hledger-lib-0.24 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733



--- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System  ---
Coin3-3.1.3-6.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Coin3-3.1.3-6.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733



--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System  ---
Coin3-3.1.3-6.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/Coin3-3.1.3-6.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195554] Review Request: ghc-wizards - High level, generic library for interrogative user interfaces

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195554

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1142928




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142928
[Bug 1142928] hledger-0.24 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195555] Review Request: ghc-tabular - Two-dimensional data tables with rendering functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=119

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1142928




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1142928
[Bug 1142928] hledger-0.24 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195555] Review Request: ghc-tabular - Two-dimensional data tables with rendering functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=119



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Better scratch build (files replaced):
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9047683

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195555] Review Request: ghc-tabular - Two-dimensional data tables with rendering functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=119

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-tabular



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9047635

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195555] New: Review Request: ghc-tabular - Two-dimensional data tables with rendering functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=119

Bug ID: 119
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-tabular - Two-dimensional data
tables with rendering functions
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-tabular.spec
SRPM URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-tabular-0.2.2.6-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
Tabular provides a Haskell representation of two-dimensional data tables, the
kind that you might find in a spreadsheet or or a research report. It also
comes with some default rendering functions for turning those tables into ASCII
art, simple text with an arbitrary delimiter, CSV, HTML or LaTeX.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195554] Review Request: ghc-wizards - High level, generic library for interrogative user interfaces

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195554

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1195553
   ||(ghc-control-monad-free)
  Alias||ghc-wizards




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195553
[Bug 1195553] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads and
monad transformers
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195553] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads and monad transformers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195553

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1195554 (ghc-wizards)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195554
[Bug 1195554] Review Request: ghc-wizards - High level, generic library for
interrogative user interfaces
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195554] New: Review Request: ghc-wizards - High level, generic library for interrogative user interfaces

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195554

Bug ID: 1195554
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-wizards - High level, generic
library for interrogative user interfaces
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-wizards.spec
SRPM URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-wizards-1.0.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
'wizards' is a package designed for the quick and painless development of
/interrogative/ programs, which revolve around a "dialogue" with the user, who
is asked a series of questions in a sequence much like an installation wizard.

Everything from interactive system scripts, to installation wizards, to
full-blown shells can be implemented with the support of 'wizards'.

It is developed transparently on top of a free monad, which separates out the
semantics of the program from any particular interface. A variety of backends
exist, including console-based "System.Console.Wizard.Haskeline" and
"System.Console.Wizard.BasicIO", and the pure "System.Console.Wizard.Pure".
It is also possible to write your own backends, or extend existing back-ends
with new features. While both built-in IO backends operate on a console, there
is no reason why 'wizards' cannot also be used for making GUI wizard
interfaces.



See the github page for examples on usage:



For creating backends, the module "System.Console.Wizard.Internal" has a brief
tutorial.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195553] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads and monad transformers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195553

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1195551
  Alias||ghc-control-monad-free




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551
[Bug 1195551] Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher
order versions of Prelude classes
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195551] Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias||ghc-prelude-extras



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195551] Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1195553
   ||(ghc-control-monad-free)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195553
[Bug 1195553] Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads and
monad transformers
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195553] New: Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads and monad transformers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195553

Bug ID: 1195553
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-control-monad-free - Free monads
and monad transformers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-control-monad-free.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-control-monad-free-0.6.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
This package provides datatypes to construct Free monads, Free monad
transformers, and useful instances. In addition it provides the constructs to
avoid quadratic complexity of left associative bind, as explained in:

Janis Voigtlander, Asymptotic Improvement of Computations over Free Monads,
MPC'08/. http://www.janis-voigtlaender.eu/Voi08d.html

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195551] Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9047514

fedora-create-review is choking on koji giving it an early EOF :( .

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195551] Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551

Jens Petersen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|peter...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195551] New: Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195551

Bug ID: 1195551
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-prelude-extras - Haskell 98 -
higher order versions of Prelude classes
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-prelude-extras.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org//ghc-prelude-extras-0.4-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description:
Haskell 98 - higher order versions of Prelude classes to ease programming with
polymorphic recursion and reduce UndecidableInstances

See  for further discussion
of the approach taken here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155376] Review Request: rnetclient - Program to submit the Brazilian Tax Report

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155376

Sergio Durigan Junior  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #6 from Sergio Durigan Junior  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: rnetclient
Short Description: Submit the Brazilian Income Tax Report to the Brazilian Tax
Authority
Upstream URL: http://wiki.libreplanetbr.org/rnetclient/
Owners: sergiodj
Branches: f20 f21 f22
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155376] Review Request: rnetclient - Program to submit the Brazilian Tax Report

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155376

Lukas Berk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1155376] Review Request: rnetclient - Program to submit the Brazilian Tax Report

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1155376

Lukas Berk  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lb...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Lukas Berk  ---
Hi, I've reviewed the latest packages,

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "GPL (v3 or later)". Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/lberk/Downloads/rnetclient/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 51200 bytes in 5 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0. |perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0.
   |28-1.fc21   |28-1.fc20



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0.28-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc
   |20  |21



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0.
   ||28-1.fc21
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-02-23 18:28:14



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Bytes-Random-Secure-0.28-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183286] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 - Read and write Passwordsafe v3 files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286
Bug 1183286 depends on bug 1183258, which changed state.

Bug 1183258 Summary: Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension 
to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc
   |6   |20



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1173159] Review Request: libsbml - Systems Biology Markup Language library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173159

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System  ---
libsbml-5.11.0-11.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc21  |layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc20



--- Comment #50 from Fedora Update System  ---
layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1190411] Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy - Implementation of the Snappy compression format for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-syndtr-gosnap |golang-github-syndtr-gosnap
   |py-0-0.1.gitce8acff.fc21|py-0-0.1.gitce8acff.fc20



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy-0-0.1.gitce8acff.fc20 has been pushed to the
Fedora 20 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1190418] Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-goleveldb - LevelDB key/value database in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190418
Bug 1190418 depends on bug 1190411, which changed state.

Bug 1190411 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy - 
Implementation of the Snappy compression format for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188178] Review Request: python-requests-toolbelt - A utility belt for advanced users of python-requests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188178

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-requests-toolbelt-0. |python-requests-toolbelt-0.
   |3.1-2.fc21  |3.1-2.fc20



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-requests-toolbelt-0.3.1-2.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1079090] Review Request: layla-fonts - A collection of traditional Arabic fonts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079090

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc21
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-02-23 18:25:45



--- Comment #49 from Fedora Update System  ---
layla-fonts-1.4-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1190411] Review Request: golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy - Implementation of the Snappy compression format for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1190411

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||golang-github-syndtr-gosnap
   ||py-0-0.1.gitce8acff.fc21
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-02-23 18:25:34



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-syndtr-gosnappy-0-0.1.gitce8acff.fc21 has been pushed to the
Fedora 21 stable repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186497] Review Request: libtifiles2 - Texas Instruments calculator files library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186497



--- Comment #4 from Ben Rosser  ---
Added new documentation subpackage and fixed a few other things:

Spec: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2.spec
SRPM: https://tc01.fedorapeople.org/tilp2/libtifiles2-1.1.6-1.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1191042] Review Request: perl-MouseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MouseX::Getopt and App::Cmd

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #4 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Thanks, Petr.

New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: Review Request: perl-MouseX-App-Cmd
Short Description: Mashes up MouseX::Getopt and App::Cmd
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/MouseX-App-Cmd/
Owners: eseyman
Branches:
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1187944] Review Request: nodejs-tern-cordovajs - A Tern plugin adding support for CordovaJS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187944



--- Comment #2 from Gerard Ryan  ---
Hi Piotr,

Thanks for the reviews this evening! Do you have any open reviews on which I
could return the favor?

I'll have a look at this one tomorrow and hopefully push a working version.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195153] Review Request: python-lmiwbem - package rename

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195153

Michal Minar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mimi...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Michal Minar  ---
My findings:
  * there's a new version of lmiwbem available (0.7.0) why not bundle it?
  * moreover lmiwbem-0.6.0-2.fc22 already exists in koji
  * lmiwbem.spec should be python-lmiwbem.spec 
- fedora-review tool refused to run due to this
  * according to [1], Obsoletes should include a release higher than the last
available release of the old package
- If I understand this correctly, it should be:
  Obsoletes: lmiwbem <= 0.6.0-3
  * again according to [1], Provides should be listed twice - once with
%{?_isa} macro and once without:
  Provides: lmiwbem = %{version}-%{release}
  Provides: lmiwbem%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}

rpmlint findings:
  * python-lmiwbem.spec: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/phatina/lmiwbem/releases/download/python-lmiwbem-0.6.0/python-lmiwbem-0.6.0.tar.gz
HTTP Error 404: Not Found
The value should be a valid, public HTTP, HTTPS, or FTP URL.

[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188514] Review Request: nodejs-time -time.h bindings for Node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188514

Piotr Popieluch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||piotr1...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch  ---
some comments:


- this is a native module and needs to be compiled
see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Node.js?rd=Node.js/Packagers#Building_native_modules_with_node-gyp
for instructions on how to build the module


- package fails to install on rawhide:

[root@localhost ~]# dnf install nodejs-time-0.11.0-1.fc23.noarch.rpm
Failed loading plugin: kickstart
Using metadata from Mon Feb 23 20:58:32 2015
Error: nothing provides npm(nan) = 1.1.2 needed by
nodejs-time-0.11.0-1.fc23.noarch

nodejs_fixdep might help with this


- description too long
please rewrap to 80 chars width


- please enable tests
%global enable_tests 1


- %check section occurs twice in spec file
please remove one


- symlink deps missing in %build
or is this not needed?


- %nodejs_symlink_deps --check missing in %check section
please add this

- latest version is 0.11.1 packaged is 0.11.0
please update

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188018] Review Request: nodejs-tern-liferay - Tern plugin for Liferay JavaScript API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188018

Piotr Popieluch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|piotr1...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch  ---
APPROVED




Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 168 files
 have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/piotr/rpmbuild/1188018-nodejs-tern-liferay/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.

[Bug 1188530] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock - DocBlock parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530



--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188530] Review Request: php-phpdocumentor-reflection-docblock - DocBlock parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188530

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1178912] Review Request: cairo-dock-plug-ins - Plug-ins files for Cairo-Dock

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912

Jan Pokorný  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(jpokorny@redhat.c |
   |om) |



--- Comment #30 from Jan Pokorný  ---
I do apologize, Mamoru, more pressing stuff keeps coming and it
is not easy to estimate the time needed to review this convoluted
package.

Now, I've started to looking into that again, overall the structure
looks better modulo these spots:

- %description at -dbus
  s/This packagcontains/This package contains/

- two identical Provides at cairo-dock-python2
  (cairo-dock-python = %{version}-%{release})

- changelog
  s/Make some package noarch/Make some packages noarch/


No need to rush with the fixes, I should have finished the review
by tomorrow.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093



--- Comment #27 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188093] Review Request: qtile - A pure-Python tiling window manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188093

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692

Adam Williamson (Fedora)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson (Fedora)  
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-natxet-cssmin
Short Description: Configurable CSS parser and minifier
Upstream URL: https://github.com/natxet/CssMin
Owners: adamwill
Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692



--- Comment #10 from Adam Williamson (Red Hat)  ---
christ, this bureaucracy is so ridiculous. clearly, the person who filed the
damn review request is an owner. why do we still have this ludicrous system?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
No owners listed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1187961] Review Request: nodejs-typescript - A language for application scale JavaScript development

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187961

Piotr Popieluch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||piotr1...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|piotr1...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch  ---
issue: version in changelog incoherent with actual version

Please consider to use github as source0 and enable tests.


Overall APPROVED, 
please update changelog version before pushing to scm




Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
 "Apache (v2.0)". Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/piotr/rpmbuild/1187961-nodejs-typescript/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
 supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
 in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
 for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
 are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
 in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
 from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: Dist tag is present (not strictly required in GL).
[

[Bug 1195058] Review Request: php-kolab-net-ldap3 - Advanced functionality for accessing LDAP directories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195058

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|limburg...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:

Nothing.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
! license ( Spec says GPLv3+, composer.json says GPLv3)
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file

Looks like just the license tag unless GPLv3+ is listed elsewhere.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 665733] Review Request: Coin3 - High-level 3D visualization library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=665733

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195054] Review Request: php-pear-Net-LDAP2 - Object oriented interface for searching and manipulating LDAP-entries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195054

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|limburg...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Good:

- rpmlint checks return:

php-pear-Net-LDAP2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US LDAPs -> Laps,
Leaps, Lapps
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

php-pear-Net-LDAP2.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ldap -> lap,
leap, dapple
The value of this tag appears to be misspelled. Please double-check.

Ignore.

- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license ( LPGLv3 ) OK
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86_64)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file 

Everything looks great.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1187944] Review Request: nodejs-tern-cordovajs - A Tern plugin adding support for CordovaJS

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187944

Piotr Popieluch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||piotr1...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Piotr Popieluch  ---
Installing this fails on Rawhide:

Error: nothing provides npm(acorn) < 0.6 needed by
nodejs-tern-cordovajs-0.1.0-1.fc23.noarch

nodejs-acorn 0.9.0 is in Rawhide, you might try a %nodejs_fixdep  if acorn
0.9.0 is backwards compatible with 0.6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183286] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 - Read and write Passwordsafe v3 files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc20

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183286] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 - Read and write Passwordsafe v3 files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Crypt-PWSafe3-1.16-1.fc21

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183286] Review Request: perl-Crypt-PWSafe3 - Read and write Passwordsafe v3 files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183286

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1183258] Review Request: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure - Perl extension to generate cryptographically-secure random bytes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183258

David Dick  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #9 from David Dick  ---
Package Change Request
==
Package Name: perl-Bytes-Random-Secure
New Branches: f22
Owners: ddick
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1178528] Review Request: python-Send2Trash - Python module to send files to trash natively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178528



--- Comment #3 from Christian Krause  ---
Here are the update files using a lowercase package name:

Spec URL: https://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/python-send2trash.spec
SRPM URL:
https://chkr.fedorapeople.org/review/python-send2trash-1.3.0-1.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1143032] Review Request: python-gssapi - GSSAPI bindings for python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1143032

Solly Ross  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sr...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(abokovoy@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #10 from Solly Ross  ---
I've updated the spec file and SRPM.  Currently, one of the requirements for
running the tests is not packaged in Fedora, so the tests are disabled.  FWIW,
we do run per-commit CI upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1194188] Review Request: fastd - Fast and secure tunneling daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194188

Florian "der-flo" Lehner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||d...@der-flo.net
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@der-flo.net
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner  ---
Hi Felix!

[ ] Please remove COPYRIGHT from %doc and add
   %license COPYRIGHT
to the files section

I will do another review, if libuecc is available upstream. So long it will
fail to build on all plattforms:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9042593

Cheers, 
 Florian

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1141494] Review Request: python-flask-whooshalchemy - Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141494



--- Comment #24 from Tonet Jallo  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: python-flask-whooshalchemy
Short Description: Whoosh extension to Flask/SQLAlchemy
Upstream URL: https://github.com/gyllstromk/Flask-WhooshAlchemy
Owners: tonet666p
Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7
InitialCC: tonet666p

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 902086] Review request: Elasticsearch

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=902086

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #138 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
(In reply to jiri vanek from comment #137)
> Is there something more you need me to do?
Nope. Package is APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1186819] Review Request: burp - Network backup / restore program

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186819



--- Comment #10 from Andrew Niemantsverdriet  ---
I have updated and tested the spec file and fixed the systemd service issues.

The updated files are located here:
SPEC URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~kaptk2/burp.spec
SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~kaptk2/burp-1.3.48-4.fc20.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195255] Review Request: compat-tolua++ - lua-5.1 compatible version of tolua++ (C++ Lua integration)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255

Martin Preisler  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Martin Preisler  ---
Looks reasonably good now. Accepted.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1177692] Review Request: php-natxet-cssmin - Configurable CSS parser and minifier

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177692

Adam Williamson (Fedora)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from Adam Williamson (Fedora)  
---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: php-natxet-cssmin
Short Description: Configurable CSS parser and minifier
Upstream URL: https://github.com/natxet/CssMin
Owners: 
Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1191042] Review Request: perl-MouseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MouseX::Getopt and App::Cmd

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata  ---
Indeed, all fixed.  Approving.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195375] Review Request: autoconf268 - autoconf 2.68 for epel6

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375

Dave Love  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1174292




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1174292
[Bug 1174292] please update for EPEL6
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195375] New: Review Request: autoconf268 - autoconf 2.68 for epel6

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195375

Bug ID: 1195375
   Summary: Review Request: autoconf268 - autoconf 2.68 for epel6
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: d.l...@liverpool.ac.uk
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/autoconf268.spec
SRPM URL:
https://loveshack.fedorapeople.org/review/autoconf268-2.68-1.el6.src.rpm
Description: autoconf 2.68 for epel6
Fedora Account System Username: loveshack

This provides an updated autoconf for epel6 to support packaging things
which need to use autoconf 2.68 after patching their configuration files,
e.g. .  It's minimally
modified from the RHEL autoconf-2.63 packaging, with names by analogy with
cmake28 and autoconf213.

koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9037957

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1191042] Review Request: perl-MouseX-App-Cmd - Mashes up MouseX::Getopt and App::Cmd

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191042



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
Sorry about the delay,I got distracted by other stuff.

(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
>
> Missing BRs:

Fixed.

> Many missing dependencies from the resulting binary RPM.  This is mostly
> from Moose-like keywords.

Added.

> Explicitly require Getopt::Long::Descriptive 0.091+ and filter out the
> underspecified autogenerated dependency.

Done.

Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd/perl-MouseX-App-Cmd-0.30-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 824083] Review Request: nyancat - A terminal Nyan Cat renderer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824083

Ben Rosser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC|rosser@gmail.com|



--- Comment #11 from Petr Šabata  ---
Ping once again.

Your git branches were created.  How about building the package?  And
submitting new-package updates for stable releases...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058



--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla  ---
There's a problem with git branch creation at the moment, we're working on it. 
Once we have it worked out I'll run the whole queue ASAP.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1195255] Review Request: compat-tolua++ - lua-5.1 compatible version of tolua++ (C++ Lua integration)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1195255



--- Comment #2 from Hans de Goede  ---
Hi,

Thanks for the review. I've done a new version fixing the Source0 problem by
not using an url. You can verify the md5sum of the sources by looking in the
lookaside cache for the normal tolua++ package. I've also fixed the tab usage
and done s/define/global/ here is the new version:

Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/compat-tolua++.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~jwrdegoede/compat-tolua++-1.0.93-2.fc22.src.rpm

Regards,

Hans

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1194058] Review Request: atomic - Tool for managing ProjectAtomic systems and containers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194058

Lokesh Mandvekar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||limburg...@gmail.com



--- Comment #10 from Lokesh Mandvekar  ---
ping limb..

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1172603] Review Request: golang-github-ghodss-yaml - A better way to marshal and unmarshal YAML in Golang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172603

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0 |golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0
   |-0.3.git3bc1590.fc20|-0.3.git3bc1590.el6



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-ghodss-yaml-0-0.3.git3bc1590.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el
   |7   |6



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1172198] Review Request: golang-github-davecgh-go-spew - Implements a deep pretty printer for Go data structures to aid in debugging

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172198

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-davecgh-go-sp |golang-github-davecgh-go-sp
   |ew-0-0.2.git1aaf839.fc21|ew-0-0.2.git1aaf839.el6



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-davecgh-go-spew-0-0.2.git1aaf839.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1188895] Review Request: python-GridDataFormats - Read and write data on regular grids in Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1188895

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|python-GridDataFormats-0.2. |python-GridDataFormats-0.2.
   |4-1.fc21|4-1.el7



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-GridDataFormats-0.2.4-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1085890] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-pflag - Replacement for Go's flag package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085890

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-pflag-0 |golang-github-spf13-pflag-0
   |-0.4.gitf82776d.fc21|-0.4.gitf82776d.el6



--- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-spf13-pflag-0-0.4.gitf82776d.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 6 stable repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 956147] Review Request: wide-dhcpv6 - DHCPv6 Prefix Delegation client that works on PPP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956147

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.e |wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.e
   |l7  |l6



--- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System  ---
wide-dhcpv6-20080615-13.1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable
repository.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1086231] Review Request: nodejs-jsonparse - Pure-js JSON streaming parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086231

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version|nodejs-jsonparse-0.0.6-5.el |nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el
   |6   |7



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-jsonparse-1.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository.  If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review