[Bug 1204556] Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 Bug 1204556 depends on bug 1204555, which changed state. Bug 1204555 Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204555] Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-03-23 02:47:08 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Thanks! I no more interested to import this package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204555] Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 Mikolaj Izdebski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mizde...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mizde...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204556] Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-03-23 02:39:11 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- i no more interested to import this package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- NON blocking issue jetty-alpn-api-javadoc.noarch: W: no-version-in-last-changelog [!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file [!]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package is included in %doc.
Note: Cannot find LICENSE-2.0.txt in rpm(s)
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
IGNORE
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"Unknown or generated". 1 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/gil/1202421-jetty-alpn-api/review-jetty-alpn-
api/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must
be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share/maven-metadata
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses, /usr/share
/maven-metadata
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[?]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is
pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including depmaps) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use %{_mavenpomdir} instead of %{_d
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135700] Review Request: antlr4 - parser generator tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700 --- Comment #10 from Mikolaj Izdebski --- Some important stuff first: 1) To become Fedora packager you need to complete FPCA first. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Account_System/CompleteFPCA 2) Once you accept FPCA, any code submitted to Fedora will be licensed under "current default license", which is MIT. Thus you shouldn't add GPL headers to code you write for Fedora. 3) Bundling is strictly prohibited. The package needs to build without using any prebuilt binaries (JARs). 4) Make sure to read and understand packaging guidelines, especially Java-related. Also read Java packaging HOWTO: https://fedorahosted.org/released/javapackages/doc/ 5) The package should probably have simillar structure to antlr3 package. It should be built with Maven. All modules should be enabled, including Maven plugin, as noted by Gil. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: treelayout Short Description: Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java Upstream URL: http://treelayout.sourceforge.net/ Owners: gil Branches: f22 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from gil cattaneo --- Thanks! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: treelayout Short Description: Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java] Upstream URL: http://treelayout.sourceforge.net/ Owners: gil Branches: f22 InitialCC: java-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202421] Review Request: jetty-alpn-api - Jetty ALPN API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202421 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 979124] Review Request: qbs - Qt Build Suite
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979124 --- Comment #74 from Jake Petroules --- Status? Also, I'll re-iterate that I don't want you maintaining an exclusions list. It's a pointless maintenance hassle and it will very likely cause problems at some point if it doesn't already. The Debian packaging of Qbs doesn't do this (https://sources.debian.net/src/qbs/1.3.4%2Bdfsg-1/debian/rules/) and neither does the RPM packaging of CMake (http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/cmake.git/tree/cmake.spec) similarly exclude any of its roughly-equivalent Find modules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909
Mikolaj Izdebski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) |
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Mikolaj Izdebski ---
Package Review
==
Key:
- = N/A
x = Check
! = Problem
[x] rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the
build produces. The output should be posted in the review.
[x] The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines.
[x] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the
format %{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[x] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines.
[x] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual
license.
[x] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of
the license(s) for the package must be included in %doc.
[x] The spec file must be written in American English.
[x] The spec file for the package MUST be legible.
[x] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream
source, as provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use
sha256sum for this task as it is used by the sources file once
imported into git. If no upstream URL can be specified for this
package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to deal with
this.
[x] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms
on at least one primary architecture.
[x] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the
spec in ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST
have a bug filed in bugzilla, describing the reason that the
package does not compile/build/work on that architecture. The bug
number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the corresponding
ExcludeArch line.
[x] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for
any that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging
Guidelines; inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional.
Apply common sense.
[x] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using
the %find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly
forbidden.
[x] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared
library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's
default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[x] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[x] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must
state this fact in the request for review, along with the
rationalization for relocation of that specific package. Without
this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a blocker.
[x] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does
not create a directory that it uses, then it should require a
package which does create that directory.
[x] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec
file's %files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in
specific situations.)
[x] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be
set with executable permissions, for example.
[x] Each package must consistently use macros.
[x] The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[x] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The
definition of large is left up to the packager's best judgement,
but is not restricted to size. Large can refer to either size or
quantity).
[x] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the
runtime of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the
program must run properly if it is not present.
[x] Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[x] Development files must be in a -devel package.
[x] In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the
base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires:
%{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
[x] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be
removed in the spec if they are built.
[x] Packages containing GUI applications must include a
%{name}.desktop file, and that file must be properly installed
with desktop-file-install in the %install section. If you feel
that your packaged GUI application does not need a .desktop file,
you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[x] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other
packages. The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be
installed should own the files or directori
[Bug 1135700] Review Request: antlr4 - parser generator tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700 --- Comment #9 from Cooper Clauson --- Hi guys, To be honest, it's been a number of months since I looked at this, partially because I perceived that there was little to no demand for this package in Fedora. However, because of the request above for the maven plugin, maybe this has changed? If so, maybe I can take a look at this in the near future. Indeed, there might be a ways to go to get this package in to shape. Thanks and regards, Cooper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1204560 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204560 [Bug 1204560] Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204560] Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204560 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1015909 ||(org.abego.treelayout.core) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 [Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204560] Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204560 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1204558 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204558 [Bug 1204558] Review Request: stringtemplate407 - A Java template engine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204558] Review Request: stringtemplate407 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204558 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1204560 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204560 [Bug 1204560] Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204560] New: Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204560 Bug ID: 1204560 Summary: Review Request: antlr41 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/antlr41.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/antlr41-4.1-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: ANother Tool for Language Recognition, is a language tool that provides a framework for constructing recognizers, interpreters, compilers, and translators from grammatical descriptions containing actions in a variety of target languages. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204558] New: Review Request: stringtemplate407 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204558 Bug ID: 1204558 Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate407 - A Java template engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/stringtemplate407.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/stringtemplate407-4.0.7-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: StringTemplate is a java template engine (with ports for C# and Python) for generating source code, web pages, emails, or any other formatted text output. StringTemplate is particularly good at multi-targeted code generators, multiple site skins, and internationalization/localization. Used by Apache Tajo Fedora Account System Username: gil Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9299794 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1204556 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 [Bug 1204556] Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204556] Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1204555, 1015909 ||(org.abego.treelayout.core) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015909 [Bug 1015909] Review Request: treelayout - Efficient and customizable Tree Layout Algorithm in Java https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 [Bug 1204555] Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204555] Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1204556 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 [Bug 1204556] Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204556] New: Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204556 Bug ID: 1204556 Summary: Review Request: antlr43 - ANother Tool for Language Recognition Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/antlr43.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/antlr43-4.3-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: ANother Tool for Language Recognition, is a language tool that provides a framework for constructing recognizers, interpreters, compilers, and translators from grammatical descriptions containing actions in a variety of target languages. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204555] New: Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204555 Bug ID: 1204555 Summary: Review Request: stringtemplate408 - A Java template engine Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/stringtemplate408.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/stringtemplate408-4.0.8-1.fc20.src.rpm Description: StringTemplate is a java template engine (with ports for C# and Python) for generating source code, web pages, emails, or any other formatted text output. StringTemplate is particularly good at multi-targeted code generators, multiple site skins, and internationalization/localization. Fedora Account System Username: gil # Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9299287 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204543] Review Request: rubygem-turn - Test Reporters (New) -- new output formats for Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204543 --- Comment #1 from Graeme Gillies --- Builds successfully in Rawhide http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9299497 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204543] New: Review Request: rubygem-turn - Test Reporters (New) -- new output formats for Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204543 Bug ID: 1204543 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-turn - Test Reporters (New) -- new output formats for Testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ggill...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-turn.spec SRPM URL: http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-turn-0.9.7-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Turn provides a set of alternative runners for MiniTest, both colorful and informative. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1200672] Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos authentication for the OpenStack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200672 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-keystoneclient-kerberos-0.1.3-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-keystoneclient-kerberos-0.1.3-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1200672] Review Request: python-keystoneclient-kerberos - Kerberos authentication for the OpenStack clients
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1200672 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135700] Review Request: antlr4 - parser generator tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo --- Please, import/build also the maven plugin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204495] Review Request: xfwm4-themes - Additional themes for xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204495 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1201124 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201124 [Bug 1201124] Essential Xfce package missing from EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1135700] Review Request: antlr4 - parser generator tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1135700 Cooper Clauson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ceclauson@hotmail | |.com) | --- Comment #7 from Cooper Clauson --- New Links: Spec URL: http://ceclauson.ddns.net/misc/antlr4.spec SRPM URL: http://ceclauson.ddns.net/misc/antlr4-4.4-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148224] Review Request: mmdb2 - protein coordinate library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148224 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2014-12-11 23:34:05 |2015-03-22 17:36:26 --- Comment #31 from Mukundan Ragavan --- (In reply to Tim Fenn from comment #30) > Yes - just retired mmdb from F22/master branches. Thanks! Let me close this bug again then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894413] Review Request: davmail - DavMail is a POP/IMAP/SMTP/Caldav/Carddav/LDAP gateway for Microsoft Exchange
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894413 --- Comment #51 from Kevin R. Page --- Just an enquiry as to whether there's any further progress? (and to signal enthusiasm for this to become a Fedora package -- thank you for the effort that's got it this far) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202591] Review Request: muon - A collection of package management tools for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202591 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann --- %doc README COPYING Please move COPYING to %license. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1148224] Review Request: mmdb2 - protein coordinate library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1148224 --- Comment #30 from Tim Fenn --- Yes - just retired mmdb from F22/master branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204495] Review Request: xfwm4-themes - Additional themes for xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204495 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1204495] New: Review Request: xfwm4-themes - Additional themes for xfwm4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204495 Bug ID: 1204495 Summary: Review Request: xfwm4-themes - Additional themes for xfwm4 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: nonamed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Package Change Request == Package Name: xfwm4-themes New Branches: epel7 Owners: kevin nonamedotc InitialCC: nonamedotc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199268] Review Request: python-libdiscid - Python bindings for libdiscid
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199268 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Ville Skyttä --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: python-libdiscid Short Description: Python bindings for libdiscid Upstream URL: http://pythonhosted.org/python-libdiscid/ Owners: scop Branches: f21 f22 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199693] Review Request: pcp-pmda-cpp - C++ library for PCP PMDAs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693
--- Comment #16 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
* The -examples package now needs an explicit dependency on "pcp", because that
is the package that provides the /var/lib/pcp/pmdas directory.
The same bug affects the "pcp" packages: bug 1204467
> %package devel
> Requires: pcp-libs-devel
The explicit dependency on "pcp-libs-devel" would be safer (for the case when
linking with any of the pcp shared libs), if it were arch-specific:
Requires: pcp-libs-devel%{?_isa}
That is, because -devel packages and their dependencies are multilib packages:
# yum list pcp-libs-devel|grep ^pcp
pcp-libs-devel.i686 3.10.3-1.fc21
updates
pcp-libs-devel.x86_64 3.10.3-1.fc21
updates
* It doesn't build with latest GCC 5 in Rawhide:
[...]
/builddir/build/BUILD/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/example/simple/../../include/pcp-cpp/pmda.hpp:
In member function 'virtual int pcp::pmda::on_store(pmResult*, pmdaExt*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/example/simple/../../include/pcp-cpp/pmda.hpp:1135:38:
error: suggest parentheses around operand of '!' or change '&' to '&&' or '!'
to '~' [-Werror=parentheses]
if (!description.flags & pcp::storable_metric) {
^
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/example/simple/simple.cpp:18:0:
/builddir/build/BUILD/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/example/simple/../../include/pcp-cpp/pmda.hpp:
In member function 'virtual int pcp::pmda::on_store(pmResult*, pmdaExt*)':
/builddir/build/BUILD/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/pcp-pmda-cpp-0.4.2/example/simple/../../include/pcp-cpp/pmda.hpp:1135:38:
error: suggest parentheses around operand of '!' or change '&' to '&&' or '!'
to '~' [-Werror=parentheses]
if (!description.flags & pcp::storable_metric) {
^
cc1plus: all warnings being treated as errors
[...]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
