[Bug 1210993] Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993 --- Comment #3 from Denis Arnaud --- Successful builds on all the architectures: EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463323 EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 --- Comment #25 from Denis Arnaud --- Successful builds on EPEL 6 for all the architectures: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463313 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 Tim Lauridsen changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Tim Lauridsen --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: yumex-dnf Short Description: Graphical package tool for maintain packages on the system Upstream URL: https://github.com/timlau/yumex-dnf Owners: timlau Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 --- Comment #7 from Tim Lauridsen --- Thanks a lot, your you have any packages needing review now or in the future, then just let me know. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210993] Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993 --- Comment #2 from Denis Arnaud --- Successful builds: EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463308 EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463310 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210969] Review Request: python-munch - A dot-accessible dictionary (a la JavaScript objects)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Docs Contact||pin...@pingoured.fr Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Pierre-YvesChibon --- * Using the sources from upstream: SRPM: 68fd192e64a22a69d445a74d84da640cb2314e9571114836864a7b5c06d1454d Upstream: 68fd192e64a22a69d445a74d84da640cb2314e9571114836864a7b5c06d1454d * License MIT is valid, present in the sources and installed correctly in the spec file * Spec file looks good ! rpmlint output can be improved: python-munch.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/munch/__init__.py 0644L /usr/bin/env python3-munch.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/munch/__init__.py 0644L /usr/bin/env 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 0 warnings. Maybe https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Remove_shebang_from_Python_libraries could help After this I'll approve the review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210993] Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993 --- Comment #1 from Denis Arnaud --- Successful build on EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463282 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 --- Comment #24 from Denis Arnaud --- Successful build on EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463281 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #23 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to Denis Arnaud from comment #21)
> (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #20)
> > The el6 failure is an undefined macro:
> > + '%{_mpich2_load}'
> > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pLSGl7: line 97: fg: no job control
>
> The only thing I do not understand, then, is why it used to work before. For
> instance,
> http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost148/boost148-1.48.0-4.spec
> contains the exact same macro (%{_mpich2_load})...
>
As a matter of fact, MPICH2 has been upgraded into MPICH v3. So, the macro is
now simply named _mpich_load (the '2' suffix has been dropped).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.0-1.el |qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.0-1.el |7 |6 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.0-1.el ||7 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-04-11 22:44:37 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202146] Review Request: python-munkres - A Munkres algorithm for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202146 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-munkres-1.0.7-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 Denis Arnaud changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs+ --- Comment #22 from Denis Arnaud --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: boost148 Short Description: The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries Upstream URL: http://www.boost.org/users/history/version_1_48_0.html Owners: denisarnaud Branches: f20 f21 f22 el5 el6 epel7 InitialCC: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #21 from Denis Arnaud ---
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #20)
> The el6 failure is an undefined macro:
> + '%{_mpich2_load}'
> /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pLSGl7: line 97: fg: no job control
Thanks!
The only thing I do not understand, then, is why it used to work before. For
instance,
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost148/boost148-1.48.0-4.spec
contains the exact same macro (%{_mpich2_load})...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161483] Review Request: o3dgc - an open 3D graphics compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161483 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Ploumistos --- The latest link to the spec file still points to the one from 0-2, not the one in your source rpm and the scripts will whine about that. I did the exact same thing a few days ago, that's why I checked :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1177038] Review Request: qt5-qtwebsockets - Qt5 - WebSockets component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1177038 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/qt5-qtwebsockets-5.4.1-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: qt5-qtwebchannel Short Description: Qt5 WebChannel component Upstream URL: http://qt.io Owners: nocnokneo group::kde-sig Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- Sorry, checking other reviews, looks like the correct syntax is group::kde-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Taylor Braun-Jones changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #4 from Taylor Braun-Jones --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: qt5-qtwebchannel Short Description: Qt5 WebChannel component Upstream URL: http://qt.io Owners: nocnokneo group:kde-sig Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 --- Comment #3 from Taylor Braun-Jones --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #1) > looks like the qt5-qtwebsocket build dependency is optional and only for > some examples, but using it here is mostly harmless. Probably worth adding > a .spec comment about this, in case it helps bootstrapping new archs. Fixed with comment explanation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194798] Review Request: GeoIP-GeoLite-data - Free GeoLite IP geolocation country database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798 --- Comment #17 from Philip Prindeville --- (In reply to Paul Howarth from comment #16) > Ping? Just reran the review tool, and the sizes changed again. Looks like you ran this on 1 April, and upstream updated again on 5 April. Real moving target! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- If you don't mind, please add group:kde-sig as comaintainer for this package when submitting scm request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- $ rpmlint qt5-qtwebchannel qt5-qtwebchannel-devel qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 5.4.0-1 ['5.4.1-1.fc22', '5.4.1-1'] qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libQt5Network.so.5 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libpthread.so.0 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libm.so.6 qt5-qtwebchannel.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency /usr/lib64/libQt5WebChannel.so.5.4.1 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1 qt5-qtwebchannel-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib qt5-qtwebchannel-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 7 warnings. mostly harmless naming: ok, matches standard naming of other qt5- modules in distro license: ok sources: ok $ md5sum *.xz bb914134c164c6758a0074748cc678ff qtwebchannel-opensource-src-5.4.1.tar.xz builds/installs: ok macros: ok scriptlet: ok looks like the qt5-qtwebsocket build dependency is optional and only for some examples, but using it here is mostly harmless. Probably worth adding a .spec comment about this, in case it helps bootstrapping new archs. Otherwise, thanks, looks good, APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210993] New: Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210993 Bug ID: 1210993 Summary: Review Request: boost157 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: denis.arnaud_fed...@m4x.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157.spec SRPM URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost157/boost157-1.57.0-1.src.rpm Description: A few packages require a fairly recent Boost version, which EPEL does not provide. EPEL 5 and 6 have had Boost-1.41 (and EPEL Boost-1.53) for a while (as a parallel installation for EPEL 5), thanks to Robert Scheck and the Zarafa project. The very same way they built Boost-1.41 for EPEL 5, I therefore propose to build Boost-1.57 for EPEL 6 and 7, as a parallel installation to the currently officially supported Boost packages (Boost-1.31 on EPEL 5, Boost-1.41 on EPEL 6 and Boost-1.53 on EPEL 7). To minimise the work (and the support!) to be required, I re-start from the Boost-1.57 package (on Fedora 22), which cleanly builds on EPEL 7 without any modification. For EPEL 5 and its MPI-related issues, I re-inject the work-arounds of Boost141 and Boost148 (on EPEL 5). For EPEL 6, work-arounds of Boost148 may have to be re-injected. References: * Review request for Boost-1.48 on EPEL 5 and 6: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 * Review request for Boost-1.41 on EPEL 5: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=673839 * Feature request for Boost-1.57 on Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F22Boost158 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews) Summary|Review Request: Qt5 - |Review Request: |WebChannel component|qt5-qtwebchannel - Qt5 ||WebChannel component Alias||qt5-qtwebchannel Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937 [Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] Review Request: Qt5 - WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|rdie...@math.unl.edu Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter ---
The el6 failure is an undefined macro:
+ '%{_mpich2_load}'
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.pLSGl7: line 97: fg: no job control
I won't treat it as a review blocker here, since the epel-7 build succeeds, but
obviously this needs to be fixed if you want to support epel-6
Thanks.
APPROVED.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134 --- Comment #19 from Denis Arnaud --- EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463024 The builds were successful for both x86-64 and ppc64 (there is an error at the end in Koji, but it seems to be a Koji issue, as all the RPMs have successfully been built) - So, ready for approval? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210972] Review Request: libkgeomap - A wrapper around different world-map components, to browse and arrange photos over a map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210972 --- Comment #1 from Rex Dieter --- Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkgeomap.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkgeomap-15.03.97-2.fc22.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Apr 11 2015 Rex Dieter 15.03.97-2 - switch to publically-available 15.03.97 - fix missing %%description - -devel: %%license COPYING.LIB COPYING-CMAKE_SCRIPTS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210971] Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210971 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkface.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkface-15.03.97-2.fc22.src.rpm %changelog * Sat Apr 11 2015 Rex Dieter 15.03.97-2 - switch to publically-available 15.03.97 - fix missing %%description - -devel: %%license COPYING.LIB COPYING-CMAKE_SCRIPTS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210990] New: Review Request: Qt5 - WebChannel component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210990 Bug ID: 1210990 Summary: Review Request: Qt5 - WebChannel component Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tay...@braun-jones.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://files.braun-jones.org/qt5-qtwebchannel.spec SRPM URL: http://files.braun-jones.org/qt5-qtwebchannel-5.4.1-1.el7.centos.src.rpm Description: The Qt WebChannel module provides a library for seamless integration of C++ and QML applications with HTML/JavaScript clients. Any QObject can be published to remote clients, where its public API becomes available. Fedora Account System Username: nocnokneo Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9463055 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 921134] Review Request: boost148 - The free peer-reviewed portable C++ source libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921134
--- Comment #18 from Denis Arnaud ---
Spec URL: http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost148/boost148.spec
SRPM URL:
http://denisarnaud.fedorapeople.org/boost/boost148/boost148-1.48.0-5.fc20.src.rpm
EPEL 7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462960
EPEL 6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462986 (the build
is fine, but the Koji build process fails at the end because of a lack of
resource)
===
(In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #16)
> May be worth reviewing later commits/fixes to base boost-1.48.0 pkg up to:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/boost.git/commit/
> ?id=dcde8a75575cb4c256ea982593c9710ac16b022c
Done. Integrated all the missing patches.
> 1 MUST fix missing -math dep in main metapackage and missing scriptlets
> fixed in:
> http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/boost.git/commit/
> ?id=8aad81e67cbfd196e040449b0bf2cd854642c447
Done
> 2. SHOULD consider using %{name} and %{?_isa} macros in place of
> hard-coding boost148 in dependencies. imo, that simplifies things keeps
> things consistent. for example, replace
> Requires: boost148-chrono = %{version}-%{release}
> with
> Requires: %{name}-chrono%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Done
Did not check yet whether the fix for ppc64 works.
===
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||970285 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970285 [Bug 970285] Review Request: shiro - A powerful and flexible open-source security framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 970285] Review Request: shiro - A powerful and flexible open-source security framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970285 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1193730 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 [Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193730] Review Request: apache-jena - Java framework for building Semantic Web and Linked Data applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193730 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1210958 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210958 [Bug 1210958] apache-commons-csv-1.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208904] Review Request: python-jenkins-job-builder - Manage Jenkins jobs with YAML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-jenkins-job-builder-1.1.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jenkins-job-builder-1.1.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208904] Review Request: python-jenkins-job-builder - Manage Jenkins jobs with YAML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-jenkins-job-builder-1.1.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-jenkins-job-builder-1.1.0-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208904] Review Request: python-jenkins-job-builder - Manage Jenkins jobs with YAML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208904 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210978] Review Request: python-contextlib2 - Backports and enhancements for the contextlib module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210978 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1210983 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210983 [Bug 1210983] Review Request: python-vcrpy - Automatically mock your HTTP interactions to simplify and speed up testing -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210983] Review Request: python-vcrpy - Automatically mock your HTTP interactions to simplify and speed up testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210983 Ralph Bean changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1210982, 1210978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210978 [Bug 1210978] Review Request: python-contextlib2 - Backports and enhancements for the contextlib module https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210982 [Bug 1210982] [patch] Add a python3 subpackage -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210983] New: Review Request: python-vcrpy - Automatically mock your HTTP interactions to simplify and speed up testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210983 Bug ID: 1210983 Summary: Review Request: python-vcrpy - Automatically mock your HTTP interactions to simplify and speed up testing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rb...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-vcrpy.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-vcrpy-1.4.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: Simplify and speed up testing HTTP by recording all HTTP interactions and saving them to "cassette" files, which are yaml files containing the contents of your requests and responses. Then when you run your tests again, they all just hit the text files instead of the internet. This speeds up your tests and lets you work offline. If the server you are testing against ever changes its API, all you need to do is delete your existing cassette files, and run your tests again. All of the mocked responses will be updated with the new API. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161099] Review Request: nodejs-wrappy - Callback wrapping utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161099 --- Comment #14 from Zuzana Svetlikova --- "The canonical method for shipping most node modules is tarballs from the npm registry." "This method should be preferred to using checkouts from git or automatically generated tarballs from GitHub." Also, the github source might include things the developer doesn't want to have in official tarball posted on npmjs.org Given the tarballs are the same, the missing macros made the builds fail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194428] Review Request: fedfind - Fedora image finder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194428 awill...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(awilliam@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #6 from awill...@redhat.com --- No, I've been busy with Beta work. I need to drop the bundled cached_property now we package it, but haven't had time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210978] New: Review Request: python-contextlib2 - Backports and enhancements for the contextlib module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210978 Bug ID: 1210978 Summary: Review Request: python-contextlib2 - Backports and enhancements for the contextlib module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rb...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-contextlib2.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-contextlib2-0.4.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: contextlib2 is a backport of the standard library's contextlib module to earlier Python versions. It also serves as a real world proving ground for possible future enhancements to the standard library version. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210978] Review Request: python-contextlib2 - Backports and enhancements for the contextlib module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210978 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean --- This package built on koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462898 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194428] Review Request: fedfind - Fedora image finder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194428 Pete Travis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||awill...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(awilliam@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #5 from Pete Travis --- I looked over this today and don't see any problems ( besides the surmountable ones mentioned in #3 ). However, there are releases up to 1.1.2 tagged in your repo, do you have an updated build for review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194798] Review Request: GeoIP-GeoLite-data - Free GeoLite IP geolocation country database
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194798 --- Comment #16 from Paul Howarth --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210971] Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210971 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann --- (In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #1) > AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. Sorry, AUTHORS is already present. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210971] Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210971 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mario.blaetterm...@gmail.co ||m --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann --- %description is still empty. AUTHORS and TODO are missing from %doc. The cmake scripts are BSD licensed, those license text should be added to the -devel package. The file libkface/libkface_export.h is LGPL licensed, that's why COPYING.LIB needs to go into -devel. rpmlint complains about a non-existent download URL. Indeed, the access is forbidden: $ wget http://download.kde.org/stable/applications/15.04.0/src/libkface-15.04.0.tar.xz --2015-04-11 21:05:15-- http://download.kde.org/stable/applications/15.04.0/src/libkface-15.04.0.tar.xz Auflösen des Hostnamens »download.kde.org (download.kde.org)« … 2001:67c:2178:7::71, 195.135.221.71 Verbindungsaufbau zu download.kde.org (download.kde.org)|2001:67c:2178:7::71|:80 … verbunden. HTTP-Anforderung gesendet, auf Antwort wird gewartet … 403 Forbidden 2015-04-11 21:05:15 FEHLER 403: Forbidden. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1030755] Review Request: python-livereload - LiveReload server in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755 --- Comment #6 from Pete Travis --- There have been a few releases since your last update, are you still interested in pursuing this review, Christopher? Nikola currently declares requirements as "livereload==2.3.2", fwiw. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 --- Comment #3 from Paulo Andrade --- The package can be built now in rawhide. Spec URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-OS.spec SRPM URL: http://pcpa.fedorapeople.org/coin-or/coin-or-OS-2.9.2-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1197488
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197488
[Bug 1197488] RFE: Please add "Provides: coin-or-cppad =
%{version}-%{release}" and "Provides: coin-or-cppad-devel =
%{version}-%{release}"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894600] Review Request: coin-or-cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600 Paulo Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2015-04-11 14:21:02 --- Comment #10 from Paulo Andrade --- I made extra requests for the cppad package as the initial patch was done incorrectly, it failed to provide coin-or-cppad-devel. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197488 But in the meantime I adjusted the package that would require it to only require cppad-devel, so, the next review for the coin-or stack is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 coin-or-OS is actually the last one, to match the coin-or monolithic tarball, after that, mostly optimizations and optional packages could be added. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1197488 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 894609] Review Request: coin-or-OS - Optimization Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894609 Bug 894609 depends on bug 894600, which changed state. Bug 894600 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154 Bug 505154 depends on bug 894600, which changed state. Bug 894600 Summary: Review Request: coin-or-cppad - A Package for Differentiation of C++ Algorithms https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894600 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 505154] Tracker: Review Requests for Science and Technology related packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=505154
Paulo Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1197488
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197488
[Bug 1197488] RFE: Please add "Provides: coin-or-cppad =
%{version}-%{release}" and "Provides: coin-or-cppad-devel =
%{version}-%{release}"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160671] Review Request: seafile - Cloud storage system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671 --- Comment #4 from Nikos Roussos --- Update to 4.1.4 SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-4.1.4-1.fc21.src.rpm Also address some things from above comment: 2. Use release tag instead of commit 3. Packaging guidelines discourage use of %makeinstall https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used 4. Enabled hardened build 5. Use %license for the LICENSE text 6. .desktop is part of the seafile-client package 7. Fixed man page naming -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160672] Review Request: seafile-client - Seafile cloud storage desktop client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160672 --- Comment #1 from Nikos Roussos --- updated to 4.1.4 Spec: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile-client.spec SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-client-4.1.4-1.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210971] Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210971 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||libkface Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210972] New: Review Request: libkgeomap - A wrapper around different world-map components, to browse and arrange photos over a map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210972 Bug ID: 1210972 Summary: Review Request: libkgeomap - A wrapper around different world-map components, to browse and arrange photos over a map Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkgeomap.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkgeomap-15.04.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: A wrapper around different world-map components, to browse and arrange photos over a map Fedora Account System Username: rdieter scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462446 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210972] Review Request: libkgeomap - A wrapper around different world-map components, to browse and arrange photos over a map
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210972 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||libkgeomap Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210971] New: Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210971 Bug ID: 1210971 Summary: Review Request: libkface - A face recognition and detection library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkface.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/libkface-15.04.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: A face recognition and detection library Fedora Account System Username: rdieter scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462465 Needed for newer digikam builds. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210828] Review Request: rubygem-semantic - Utility class for parsing, storing, and comparing versions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210828 Ken Dreyer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ktdre...@ktdreyer.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ktdre...@ktdreyer.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Ken Dreyer --- Some initial comments... - License is set as "ASL 2.0", but upstream's license is really MIT - The code in %check uses rspec, so you'll need to BuildRequire: rubygems(rspec) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1201925] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-touchpad-indicator - Minimalistic Touchpad management extension for the Gnome Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201925 --- Comment #3 from Alexander Ploumistos --- (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #2) > The comment and %files section breakdown etc are in the "...actual > implementation of this is left to the maintainer. Some suggested > implementations include..." category, so I think the comment is enough > (they're suggested, not mandatory, and not all of them need to be done > anyway). Fine by me, no need for nitpicking. Have you by any chance tested the extension with libinput? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210969] Review Request: python-munch - A dot-accessible dictionary (a la JavaScript objects)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969 Pierre-YvesChibon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pin...@pingoured.fr --- Comment #2 from Pierre-YvesChibon --- You can drop the python2_sitearch definition at the top since you don't need it. Otherwise spec file looks clean -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210826] Review Request: rubygem-pathspec - Use to match path patterns such as gitignore
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210826
--- Comment #3 from Ken Dreyer ---
I imported your SRPM into a Git repo so it's clearer. Here's how I recommend
handling the tests:
https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/ktdreyer/public_git/rubygem-pathspec.git/commit/?id=2957c1fb52216a43e9b6fc94d4fd7d02cf6738d8
I use a small shell script (rubygem-pathspec-generate-tarball.sh) to download
the upstream source zipfile from a GitHub tag, then strip down that zipfile so
it only contains the tests. At that point, %setup can decompress Source2 so
that it appears to be part of the tree.
To fix this upstream, I've submitted
https://github.com/highb/pathspec-ruby/pull/4
Ruby's RSpec library has made some API breaks between 2.x and 3.x, so I've also
updated the .spec there to handle both APIs depending on the %{fedora} version.
This allows the package to build on Fedora 21, 22, and 23.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210969] Review Request: python-munch - A dot-accessible dictionary (a la JavaScript objects)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969 --- Comment #1 from Ralph Bean --- Scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9462321 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210969] New: Review Request: python-munch - A dot-accessible dictionary (a la JavaScript objects)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210969 Bug ID: 1210969 Summary: Review Request: python-munch - A dot-accessible dictionary (a la JavaScript objects) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rb...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-munch.spec SRPM URL: http://ralph.fedorapeople.org//python-munch-2.0.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: munch is a fork of David Schoonover's **Bunch** package, providing similar functionality. 99% of the work was done by him, and the fork was made mainly for lack of responsiveness for fixes and maintenance on the original code. Munch is a dictionary that supports attribute-style access, a la JavaScript. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1209971] Review Request: usbguard - A tool for implementing USB device usage policy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209971 --- Comment #17 from Daniel Kopeček --- Added dependencies on json-static and spdlog-static. Bundled libraries are removed in %prep. New SRPM is at: https://fedorapeople.org/~dkopecek/usbguard/usbguard-0.3p2-1.fc20.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430
Florian "der-flo" Lehner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #6 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner ---
Hi Tim!
Looks good :)
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found:
"*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or
generated". 2 files have unknown license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/cmn,
/usr/share/locale/cmn/LC_MESSAGES
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/locale/cmn,
/usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/locale/cmn/LC_MESSAGES,
/usr/share/dbus-1/services
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos),
/usr/share/icons/hicolor(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos),
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos),
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos),
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps(hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in yumex-dnf
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
contains icons.
Note: icons in yumex-dnf
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one
supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %doc.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-
file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install' ' DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package do not use a name that already exist
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
p
[Bug 1161483] Review Request: o3dgc - an open 3D graphics compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161483 --- Comment #4 from David Tardon --- (In reply to Alexander Ploumistos from comment #2) > I am away from my main system and I don't have koji setup here, so I could > only test locally for x86_64. Have you tried building the package for other > architectures? http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/dtardon/pending-review/build/83444/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161483] Review Request: o3dgc - an open 3D graphics compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161483 --- Comment #3 from David Tardon --- Spec URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/o3dgc.spec SRPM URL: https://dtardon.fedorapeople.org/rpm/o3dgc-0-3.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1205376] Review Request: spooky-c - C port of Bob Jenkins' spooky hash algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205376 --- Comment #15 from Jeff Layton --- I haven't forgotten about this, but I haven't been able to get Andi to respond to my efforts to clarify the licensing yet. I'm hoping that it's just because he's busy. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129429] Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 --- Comment #4 from Nikos Roussos --- (In reply to Vladimir Stackov from comment #2) > Your packages (seafile and ccnet) both introduces build time requirements > (cross-package BuildRequires) so you should setup boostraping properly: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bootstrapping I'm not familiar with Bootsrapping. Both seafile and ccnet depend on libsearpc. How this is a circular dependency? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129429] Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 --- Comment #3 from Nikos Roussos --- Update to 4.1.4 SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/ccnet.spec SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/ccnet-4.1.4-1.fc21.src.rpm Also address some things from above comment: 2. Use release tag instead of commit 3. Packaging guidelines discourage use of %makeinstall https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Why_the_.25makeinstall_macro_should_not_be_used 4. Enabled hardened build 5. Use %license for the LICENSE text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129224] Review Request: libsearpc - A simple and easy-to-use C language RPC framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129224 --- Comment #10 from Nikos Roussos --- Updated to use release tag instead of commit: SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/libsearpc.spec SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/libsearpc-3.0-3.fc21.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1201925] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-touchpad-indicator - Minimalistic Touchpad management extension for the Gnome Shell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1201925 --- Comment #2 from Ville Skyttä --- Good job with the review, thanks. License tag fixed and comment added: https://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-touchpad-indicator.spec https://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/gnome-shell-extension-touchpad-indicator-0-2.20150221gitf2f30f4.fc23.src.rpm The comment and %files section breakdown etc are in the "...actual implementation of this is left to the maintainer. Some suggested implementations include..." category, so I think the comment is enough (they're suggested, not mandatory, and not all of them need to be done anyway). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 --- Comment #5 from Tim Lauridsen --- Spec URL: https://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/yumex-dnf/yumex-dnf.spec SRPM URL: https://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/yumex-dnf/yumex-dnf-4.0.10-3.fc22.src.rpm - forgot to update upstream source, done now, so checksums should match now - fixed incoherent-version-in-changelog -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1202265] Review Request: python-grabserial - Reads a serial port and writes data to standard output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202265
Parag AN(पराग) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग) ---
+ is OK
- Needs work
Review:
+ Package builds fine in mock F23 x86_64
+ rpmlint on generated rpms gave output
python-grabserial.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary grabserial
python-grabserial.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
https://github.com/tbird20d/grabserial/releases/download/v1.7.1/grabserial-1.7.1.tar.gz
HTTP Error 403: Forbidden
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings.
===> I see wget is working fine with Source0 url so we can ignore the forbidden
warning. This looks like a github issue.
+ Source verified with upstream as sha256sum
tarball in srpm:
7354449842439cb1d119bff99857ad23e955facff9915260433eb5385a6366af
tarball in upstream:
7354449842439cb1d119bff99857ad23e955facff9915260433eb5385a6366af
- License tag LGPLv2 is wrong it should be GPLv2+. Please check license file
text and see its not Lesser and also words "any later version" which concludes
GPLv2+
- Macros are not correct. use %{python2_sitelib}
Suggestions:
1) I will suggest a cosmetic change to write the %files section as
%files
%doc README
%license LICENSE
%{_bindir}/grabserial
%{python2_sitelib}/*.egg-info
2) I see that pyserial is also available for python3. Maybe try asking upstream
to make this Grabserial project compatible with python3. Then you can add
python3 subpackage in spec as given in Fedora Python packaging guidelines.
Note this point is not a blocker for this review but just a suggestion from me.
Please submit the new SPEC and SRPM by bumping the release tag to -2 and adding
appropriate changelog entry and provide new package links for further review.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208842] Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842 --- Comment #7 from Alexander Ploumistos --- And another one: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161483 I am a little worried that so far I've only noticed mostly licensing issues... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1161483] Review Request: o3dgc - an open 3D graphics compression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1161483 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alex.ploumis...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Hello, This is an unofficial review. I don't know if anyone more qualified than me will take issue with the source (re)packaging, which gives rpmlint something to complain about, but the rationale seems obvious. The patch is also pretty much self-explanatory, perhaps someone would prefer a more explicit comment someplace. There does seem to be an issue with the licenses though: BSD (2 clause) -- o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcArithmeticCodec.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/src/o3dgcArithmeticCodec.cpp MIT/X11 (BSD like) -- o3dgc/js/o3dgc.js o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcAdjacencyInfo.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcBinaryStream.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcCommon.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcDVEncodeParams.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcDynamicVector.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcFIFO.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcIndexedFaceSet.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcSC3DMCEncodeParams.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcTimer.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcTriangleFans.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/inc/o3dgcVector.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/src/o3dgcTools.cpp o3dgc/src/o3dgc_common_lib/src/o3dgcTriangleFans.cpp o3dgc/src/o3dgc_decode_lib/inc/o3dgcDynamicVectorDecoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_decode_lib/inc/o3dgcSC3DMCDecoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_decode_lib/inc/o3dgcTriangleListDecoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_decode_lib/src/o3dgcDynamicVectorDecoder.cpp o3dgc/src/o3dgc_encode_lib/inc/o3dgcDynamicVectorEncoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_encode_lib/inc/o3dgcSC3DMCEncoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_encode_lib/inc/o3dgcTriangleListEncoder.h o3dgc/src/o3dgc_encode_lib/src/o3dgcDynamicVectorEncoder.cpp o3dgc/src/test/src/main.cpp Unknown or generated o3dgc/install/run.py o3dgc/js/index.php o3dgc/js/three.min.js You need to specify all licenses in the spec file and it would be nice to sort files in the %files section by their license. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Multiple_Licensing_Scenarios I am away from my main system and I don't have koji setup here, so I could only test locally for x86_64. Have you tried building the package for other architectures? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 --- Comment #4 from Florian "der-flo" Lehner --- Hi Tim! There are still issues: [ ] Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL Only in /home/flo/review/1210430-yumex-dnf/srpm-unpacked/yumex-dnf-4.0.10.tar.gz-extract: yumex-dnf-4.0.10 Only in /home/flo/review/1210430-yumex-dnf/upstream-unpacked/Source0: yumex-dnf-yumex-dnf-4.0.10 Source checksums https://github.com/timlau/yumex-dnf/archive/yumex-dnf-4.0.10.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d7822fcb50821a4d1ae5d3bf2a9672f1f5493caf69f5260d0af15409a41f4d85 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3f720e90e02cad75939f196e00ece5b3b57932f9d627b0bddf288519fbc31e9c [ ] incoherent-version-in-changelog It should look something like: * Thu Apr 9 2015 Tim Lauridsen 4.0.10-3 Cheers, Florian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1141807] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-etcd - The official etcd v0.2 client library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1141807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-coreos-go-etc |golang-github-coreos-go-etc |d-0.4.6-0.2.rc1.git2af7a95. |d-0.4.6-0.2.rc1.git2af7a95. |fc21|fc20 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-coreos-go-etcd-0.4.6-0.2.rc1.git2af7a95.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1085881] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-cobra - A Commander for modern go CLI interactions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1085881 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |golang-github-spf13-cobra-0 |-0.7.git79bd93d.fc21|-0.7.git79bd93d.fc20 --- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-cobra-0-0.7.git79bd93d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196363] Review Request: golang-github-docker-spdystream - A multiplexed stream library using spdy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196363 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-docker-spdyst |golang-github-docker-spdyst |ream-0-0.3.gite731c8f.fc21 |ream-0-0.3.gite731c8f.fc20 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-docker-spdystream-0-0.3.gite731c8f.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1164152] Review Request: golang-github-emicklei-go-restful - Package for building REST-style Web Services using Google Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1164152 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-emicklei-go-r |golang-github-emicklei-go-r |estful-1.1.3-0.1.git5e1952e |estful-1.1.3-0.1.git5e1952e |.fc21 |.fc20 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-emicklei-go-restful-1.1.3-0.1.git5e1952e.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1082734] Review Request: golang-github-godbus-dbus - Go client bindings for D-Bus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082734 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|golang-github-godbus-dbus-2 |golang-github-godbus-dbus-2 |-0.1.git939230d.fc21|-0.1.git939230d.fc20 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-godbus-dbus-2-0.1.git939230d.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210941] Review Request: isrcsubmit - Script to submit ISRCs from disc to MusicBrainz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210941 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|from disc to MusicBrainz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210941] New: Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210941 Bug ID: 1210941 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ville.sky...@iki.fi QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/isrcsubmit.spec https://scop.fedorapeople.org/packages/isrcsubmit-2.0.0-1.fc21.src.rpm Description: isrcsubmit extracts ISRCs from audio cds and submits them to MusicBrainz. Features: read and submit ISRCs from disc, search for releases with the TOC of the disc, submit discIds / TOCs, display release information from MusicBrainz, duplicate ISRC detection (local and on server), keyring support for login information. Fedora Account System Username: scop -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210939] New: Review Request: vdr-skindesigner - A VDR skinning engine that displays XML based Skins
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210939 Bug ID: 1210939 Summary: Review Request: vdr-skindesigner - A VDR skinning engine that displays XML based Skins Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mgans...@alice.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/vdr-skindesigner.spec SRPM URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/vdr-skindesigner-0.4.2-2.fc21.src.rpm Description: SkinDesigner is a powerfull tool to create VDR Skins based on Skindesigner specific XML Code. The following documentation shows the SkinDesigner "internals" so that new Skinners get easily an overview how Skindesigner works. Hopefully all your open questions are answerd, if not, feel free to ask in VDR Portal. Fedora Account System Username: martinkg The package has been available on rpmfusion so far. http://cvs.rpmfusion.org/viewvc/rpms/vdr-skindesigner/devel/?root=free It seems that it has no dependencies that are only in RPM Fusion and a license problem does not exist either, so we could get back the package to Fedora ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1063052] Review Request: rubygem-middleman - A static site generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1063052 Nitesh Narayan Lal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||niteshnarayanlalleo@gmail.c ||om Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags||fedora-review+ Last Closed||2015-04-11 04:14:26 --- Comment #4 from Nitesh Narayan Lal --- Apologies for the delayed response, I won't be able to work on this due to lack of time. @Christopher I am not a new to Fedora but you must think before you write. Putting it in a gentle way if you don't want to do it, then don't do it. Remember no one is perfect and we learn as we do. @Rex & @Haikel Sorry guys, I am closing this for now. Hopefully will pick it up again once I get some time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430 --- Comment #3 from Tim Lauridsen --- koji scratchbuid: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9461220 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1210430] Review Request: yumex-dnf - graphical package manager powered by dnf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1210430
--- Comment #2 from Tim Lauridsen ---
Thanks for reviewing !
Spec URL:
https://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/yumex-dnf/yumex-dnf.spec
SRPM
URL:https://timlau.fedorapeople.org/files/packages/yumex-dnf/yumex-dnf-4.0.10-2.fc22.src.rpm
fixed rpmlint errors, make flags and Using both %{buildroot} and
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
