[Bug 1215097] Review Request: aws-sdk-java - AWS SDK for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215097 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- Take a look here https://github.com/aws/aws-sdk-java/pull/417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 676930] Review Request: gmock - Google C++ Mocking Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676930 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||gmock-1.6.0-3.el7 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- gmock-1.6.0-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 772217] Review Request: libyuv - YUV conversion and scaling functionality library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=772217 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|libyuv-0-0.3.20120109svn128 |libyuv-0-0.22.20121221svn52 |.el6|2.el7 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- libyuv-0-0.22.20121221svn522.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215150] Review Request: python-pathlib - Object-oriented filesystem paths
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215150 --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar --- 1. I did provide upstream url, there's no possible confusion. You're confusing with pathlib2 which is a fork of pathlib, Antoine Pitrou's version is the reference. We're talking about the backport of python 3.4 standard library module by its maintainer. 2. No, the pristine release is the one in pypi, using bitbucket ugly generated tarball won't cut it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215732] Review Request: pypy3 - Python 3 implementation with a Just-In-Time compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215732 --- Comment #14 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #13) > > I think you can switch to building with pypy instead of python2. > Any particular reason? Speed. The comment in the spec file indicate that pypy is faster, but the package is built with python2 to avoid a self-dependency. But this reason does not apply anymore. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1216055] Review Request: ardour4 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Underwood --- On starting ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc21 I get the dialogue box with: WARNING: Your system has a limit for maximum amount of locked memory. This might cause Ardour to run out of memory before your system runs out of memory. You can view the memory limit with 'ulimit -l', and it is normally controlled by /etc/security/limits.conf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1109049] Review Request: libcsv - small, simple and fast CSV library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1109049 Jan Holcapek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2015-05-02 15:49:46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1077081] Review Request: spread - cluster messaging toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1077081 Jan Holcapek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CANTFIX Last Closed||2015-05-02 15:24:25 --- Comment #10 from Jan Holcapek --- Since Spread developers are not willing to re-license to three-clause BSD license, I am giving up the effort to include it in Fedora/EPEL. Instead, I have submitted the package to Rpmfusion just recently: https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3601 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215732] Review Request: pypy3 - Python 3 implementation with a Just-In-Time compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215732
--- Comment #13 from Miro Hrončok ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #12)
> I think you missed those comments:
>
> (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #10)
> > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
> > Note: Directories without known owners:
> > /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d,→ OK
> > /usr/lib/rpm, → OK
> > /usr/lib64/pypy3-2.4.0→ should be owned
>
> > [?]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
> > Note: %define requiring justification: %define gcrootfinder_options
> > --gcrootfinder=shadowstack, %define gcrootfinder_options %{nil}
> > Looks like this could be changed to %global.
I've missed them, yes, sorry.
> BuildRequires: git
> should be added for the %autosetup -S git thing to work.
OK.
> I think you can switch to building with pypy instead of python2.
Any particular reason?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215071] Review Request: querydsl - Type-safe queries for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215071 Bug 1215071 depends on bug 1215077, which changed state. Bug 1215077 Summary: Review Request: geolatte-geom - A geometry model for Java that conforms to the Simple Features For SQL https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215077 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215077] Review Request: geolatte-geom - A geometry model for Java that conforms to the Simple Features For SQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||geolatte-geom-0.14-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-05-02 14:12:29 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- geolatte-geom-0.14-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1178149] Review Request: springframework-hateoas - Library to support implementing representations for hyper-text driven REST web services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178149 Bug 1178149 depends on bug 1149227, which changed state. Bug 1149227 Summary: Review Request: evo-inflector - Implements English pluralization algorithm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149227 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1149227] Review Request: evo-inflector - Implements English pluralization algorithm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||evo-inflector-1.2.1-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-05-02 14:09:32 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- evo-inflector-1.2.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1211831] Review Request: copyq - Advanced Qt based clipboard manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211831 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||copyq-2.4.6-4.fc22 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System --- copyq-2.4.6-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1185963] Review Request: kde-gtk-config - Configure the appearance of GTK apps in KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185963 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- kde-gtk-config-5.3.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1216055] Review Request: ardour4 - Digital Audio Workstation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216055 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ardour4-4.0.0-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193531] Review Request: php-phpspec - Specification-oriented BDD framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193531
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL5 bits after initial import.
No blockers
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193531] Review Request: php-phpspec - Specification-oriented BDD framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193531 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1021170 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1021170&action=edit phpcompatinfo.log phpCompatInfo version 3.7.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193531] Review Request: php-phpspec - Specification-oriented BDD framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193531 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1021169 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1021169&action=edit redora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.5.2 (63c24cb) last change: 2014-07-14 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1193531 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL5, BATCH, DISTTAG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1193531] Review Request: php-phpspec - Specification-oriented BDD framework for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1193531 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|shawn.iwin...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1207591] Review Request: php-andrewsville-php-token-reflection - Library emulating the PHP internal reflection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207591 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||shawn.iwin...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Shawn Iwinski --- Please include mksrc.sh as a source so it gets included in the srpm :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|projects...@smart.ms|tchollingswo...@gmail.com --- Comment #16 from Raphael Groner --- Assigning back to the original review offer. Sorry, I did not want to offend anyone but help as far as I can. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 984560] Review Request: Enki - Extensible text editor for programmers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560 --- Comment #10 from Yajo --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #9) > Would you mind to build with Qt5? Well, upstream suggests PyQt4 as a > dependency, maybe it buikds also with PyQt5. Not until https://github.com/hlamer/qutepart/issues/21 gets fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1015868] Review Request: python-qutepart - Source code text editor component based on Qt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
Yajo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(tchollingsworth@g |
|mail.com) |
|needinfo?(yajo@gmail.co |
|m) |
--- Comment #15 from Yajo ---
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12)
> The %license line is required for any new spec file.
OK, I'll do it but then please fix the docs. The contraiction I said in comment
11 is in
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package#.25files_prefixes
> If there's no license
> text, request one from upstream or suggest a standard text for the license
> upstream is claiming.
>
> Would you mind to rename the package to just "qutepart" and remove the
> python prefix from name? If so, you can get rid of the project macro and
> please use %{name} consistently, also for the %files section.
>
> Really do not know why python is needed in the name cause the package
> installs a standalone application, not a library or the like.
Sorry but did you actually review my package? It has an upstream LICENSE file
and it IS a library, so the naming is correct according to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28python_modules.29
> Are you
> planning to do a parallel python3 build where applicable (currently not
> possible for EPEL)?
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Python#Avoiding_collisions_between_the_python_2_and_python_3_stacks
Right now upstream only supports python 2.7.
https://github.com/hlamer/qutepart#building-and-installation-on-linux
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #13)
> Hmm. We have the problem that I can not sponsor you. This review can not
> continue without a sponsor. :(
>
> Bug #177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) says:
> Warren Togami 2006-05-04 15:42:33 CEST
> People should not sit in NEED-SPONSOR status and just expect sponsorship.
> The
> best way to get sponsorship is to continue doing other work, like reviewing
> other packages, giving helpful advice, or submitting more packages for
> review.
> Having approved packages is *NOT* the requirement for gaining cvsextras
> sponsorship. Instead demonstrating that you understand the packaging
> guidelines
> and Fedora process to sponsor members is what is necessary to gain
> sponsorship.
I understand that. See comment 6.
I have not much time from my daily job to review lots of packages. If an
official packager wants to take this work and close these bugs by himself it's
OK for me. It would be a bit frustrating not to become a packager, as I usually
make packages for fedora that I'd like to share with others, but I prefer to
actually see enki in the repos that to wait endlessly to have a packager badge
in my sleeve.
(In reply to Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) from comment
#14)
> bug 984560 buildrequires and requires bug 1015868 - that's the dependency!
Indeed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 487349] Review Request: bashdb - BASH debugger, the BASH symbolic debugger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=487349 Paulo Roma Cavalcanti changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Paulo Roma Cavalcanti --- Package Change Request == Package Name: bashdb New Branches: el6 el7 Owners: roma InitialCC: roma -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208835] Re-Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208835] Re-Review Request: gdouros-akkadian-fonts - A font for Sumero-Akkadian cuneiform
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208835 --- Comment #9 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-akkadian-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208838] Re-Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208838 --- Comment #5 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-alexander-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208838] Re-Review Request: gdouros-alexander-fonts - A Greek typeface inspired by Alexander Wilson
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208838 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208830] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - A font for ancient scripts in the greater Aegean vicinity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208830 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208830] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegean-fonts - A font for ancient scripts in the greater Aegean vicinity
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208830 --- Comment #6 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-aegean-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208842] Re-Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842 --- Comment #22 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-symbola-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208842] Re-Review Request: gdouros-symbola-fonts - A symbol font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208842 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208839] Re-Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An ecclesiastic scripts font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208839 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-analecta-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208839] Re-Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An ecclesiastic scripts font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208839 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208840] Re-Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208840 --- Comment #4 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-musica-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208840] Re-Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208840 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833 Alexander Ploumistos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833 --- Comment #13 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts Branches: f20 f21 f22 master Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833 Parag changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pnem...@redhat.com --- Comment #12 from Parag --- Yes add again CVS request with all the branches where you want to be owner. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208833] Re-Review Request: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts - A font for Egyptian hieroglyphs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208833 --- Comment #11 from Alexander Ploumistos --- Do I need to specify the branches in my request, or is the following sufficient? Package Change Request == Package Name: gdouros-aegyptus-fonts Owners: alexpl InitialCC: fonts-sig (not setting the cvs flag yet on purpose) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208840] Re-Review Request: gdouros-musica-fonts - A font for musical symbols
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208840 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5 ||32818 Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: |Re-Review Request: |gdouros-musica-fonts - A|gdouros-musica-fonts - A |font for musical symbols|font for musical symbols Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Review: + mock build is successful for F23 (x86_64) + rpmlint on generated rpms gave output gdouros-musica-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s gdouros-musica-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US glyphs -> glyph, glyph s 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm Source0: 7aeab12245ab3959b1a81abd6477e121522db5ad304ed952faea10b4731d5bb1 upstream Source0 : 7aeab12245ab3959b1a81abd6477e121522db5ad304ed952faea10b4731d5bb1 srpm Source1 : c823bc3a4802ac6096d8673048d1f36008718090a3dc46b7d6ce5f22cc699a66 upstream Source1 : c823bc3a4802ac6096d8673048d1f36008718090a3dc46b7d6ce5f22cc699a66 + License is "Public Domain" as per given on upstream website "Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or other market tags; they are free for any use". So no license text is included in font file or any text file + follows fonts packaging guidelines. + fontconfig file is present at priority 65. + Appdata metainfo file is present. Package APPROVED. You want to submit here package change request to own this package. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 532817] Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An eccleastic scripts font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1208839 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208839] Re-Review Request: gdouros-analecta-fonts - An ecclesiastic scripts font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208839 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||panem...@gmail.com See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=532817 Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com Summary|Review Request: |Re-Review Request: |gdouros-analecta-fonts - An |gdouros-analecta-fonts - An |ecclesiastic scripts font |ecclesiastic scripts font Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Review: + mock build is successful for F23 (x86_64) + rpmlint on generated rpms gave output gdouros-analecta-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US typographica -> typographic, typographical, typographic a gdouros-analecta-fonts.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US varia -> aria, maria, Maria gdouros-analecta-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US typographica -> typographic, typographical, typographic a gdouros-analecta-fonts.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US varia -> aria, maria, Maria 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) srpm Source0: 0d2d88fc78476bc635108392cdbd5a70cda4f0921e29dfe62fbc93122f82d282 upstream Source0 : 0d2d88fc78476bc635108392cdbd5a70cda4f0921e29dfe62fbc93122f82d282 srpm Source1 : 2849dde03a2b86583de98fa1d27d48a21343cb2e87ac150f82f9b4e531dffbae upstream Source1 : 2849dde03a2b86583de98fa1d27d48a21343cb2e87ac150f82f9b4e531dffbae + License is "Public Domain" as per given on upstream website "Fonts and documents in this site are not pieces of property or merchandise items; they carry no trademark, copyright, license or other market tags; they are free for any use". So no license text is included in font file or any text file + follows fonts packaging guidelines. + fontconfig file is present at priority 65. + Appdata metainfo file is present. Package APPROVED. You want to submit here package change request to own this package. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
