[Bug 1221548] Review Request: python-mininet - Emulator for rapid prototyping of Software Defined Networks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221548 Archit Sharma changed: What|Removed |Added CC||arcsh...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(arcsh...@gmail.co ||m) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1218025] Review Request: cashe - program and libraries for accessing a CAS cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218025 --- Comment #6 from James Antill --- The stupid incoherent-version-in-changelog warning still persists, because of the way I'm building the new rpms without adding changelogs atm. I think I've fixed up everything else though. Blob specfile URL: https://github.com/james-antill/CAShe/blob/master/cashe.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1219411] Review Request: python34 - Version 3 of the Python programming language aka Python 3000
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1219411
--- Comment #2 from Aurelien Bompard ---
Since there's already a python3 package in Fedora, I'll comment on the diff
between the current master and this package.
My comments are inlined in the diff below, and start with "--> "
@@ -16,3 +16,3 @@
-%global with_rewheel 1
+%global with_rewheel 0
@@ -23,2 +23,10 @@
+# is this the EPEL 7 main Python 3?
+%if "%python3_pkgversion" == "%pyshortver"
+%global main_python3 1
+%else
+%global main_python3 0
+%endif
+
+
%global pylibdir %{_libdir}/python%{pybasever}
--> The with_rewheel flag should be set to 1 in the final package, as it is in
the current master.
--> I don't understand this main_python3 package flag. This package will never
be the main Python3 package, because it's from EPEL and RHEL will always ship
the main python3 package.
@@ -140,5 +148,5 @@
Summary: Version 3 of the Python programming language aka Python 3000
-Name: python3
-Version: %{pybasever}.2
-Release: 4%{?dist}
+Name: python%{pyshortver}
+Version: %{pybasever}.3
+Release: 1%{?dist}
License: Python
@@ -201,4 +209,4 @@
%if 0%{?with_rewheel}
-BuildRequires: python3-setuptools
-BuildRequires: python3-pip
+BuildRequires: python%{pyshortver}-setuptools
+BuildRequires: python%{pyshortver}-pip
%endif
@@ -220,3 +228,3 @@
# __python3, python3_sitelib, python3_sitearch
-Source2: macros.python3
+Source2: macros.python%{pybasever}
@@ -225,3 +233,3 @@
# with different Python runtimes as necessary:
-Source3: macros.pybytecompile
+Source3: macros.pybytecompile%{pybasever}
--> No problem with that
@@ -446,4 +454,4 @@
# which values are printed as "v@entry" rather than just "v":
-# Not yet sent upstream
-Patch153: 00153-fix-test_gdb-noise.patch
+# Upstream as of 3.4.3
+# Patch153: 00153-fix-test_gdb-noise.patch
@@ -463,4 +471,4 @@
# suite to ensure that it can load our -gdb.py script (rhbz#817072):
-# Not yet sent upstream
-Patch156: 00156-gdb-autoload-safepath.patch
+# Upstream as of 3.4.3
+# Patch156: 00156-gdb-autoload-safepath.patch
--> Upstreamed patches, nice! :-)
@@ -710,3 +718,4 @@
# Issue: http://bugs.python.org/issue22638 Upstream discussion about SSLv3 in
Python
-Patch199: 00199-alter-tests-to-reflect-sslv3-disabled.patch
+# OpenSSL in RHEL has SSLv3 enabled
+#Patch199: 00199-alter-tests-to-reflect-sslv3-disabled.patch
--> Also a good thing
@@ -724,2 +733,9 @@
+# 00202 #
+# Fixes undefined behaviour in faulthandler which caused tests to hang in on
x86_64
+# http://bugs.python.org/issue23433
+Patch202: 00202-fix-undefined-behaviour-in-faulthandler.patch
+
+# test_threading fails in koji dues to it's handling of signals
+Patch203: 00203-disable-threading-test-koji.patch
--> Those patches look OK to me.
@@ -764,4 +780,4 @@
%if 0%{with_rewheel}
-Requires: python3-setuptools
-Requires: python3-pip
+Requires: python%{pyshortver}-setuptools
+Requires: python%{pyshortver}-pip
%endif
@@ -828,3 +844,3 @@
-You might want to install the python3-test package if you're developing
+You might want to install the python%{pyshortver}-test package if you're
developing
python 3 code that uses more than just unittest and/or test_support.py.
@@ -847,3 +863,3 @@
%description debug
-python3-debug provides a version of the Python 3 runtime with numerous
debugging
+python%{pyshortver}-debug provides a version of the Python 3 runtime with
numerous debugging
features enabled, aimed at advanced Python users, such as developers of Python
@@ -954,6 +970,6 @@
# 00152: upstream as of Python 3.3.0b2
-%patch153 -p0
+# 00153: upstream as of Python 3.4.3
# 00154: not for this branch
%patch155 -p1
-%patch156 -p1
+# 00156: upstream as of 3.4.3
%patch157 -p1
@@ -1003,3 +1019,6 @@
# 00197: upstream as of Python 3.4.2
-%patch199 -p1
+# 00199: doesn't apply to RHEL 7
+%patch202 -p1
+%patch203 -p1
+
--> OK as reviewed before
@@ -1066,2 +1085,3 @@
PathFixWithThisBinary=$5
+ MoreCFlags=$6
@@ -1103,4 +1123,3 @@
# Invoke the build:
- # TODO: it seems that 3.4.0a4 fails with %{?_smp_flags}, have to figure out
why
- make EXTRA_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS"
+ make EXTRA_CFLAGS="$CFLAGS $MoreCFlags" %{?_smp_mflags}
--> So, the build now works with smp_mflags? Nice.
@@ -1121,3 +1140,4 @@
%endif
- false
+ false \
+ -O1
%endif # with_debug_build
--> What's the reason for adding the O1 flag?
@@ -1143,2 +1163,3 @@
PyInstSoName=$2
+ MoreCFlags=$3
@@ -1151,3 +1172,8 @@
-make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p"
+%if 0%{?main_python3}
+make install \
+%else
+make altinstall \
+%endif
+ DESTDIR=%{buildroot} INSTALL="install -p" EXTRA_CFLAGS="$MoreCFlags"
@@ -1194,3 +1220,13 @@
InstallPython debug \
- %{py_INSTSONAME_debug}
+ %{py_INSTSONAME_debug} \
+ -O1
+
+%if ! 0%{?main_python3}
+# altinstall only creates pkgconfig/python-3.4.pc, not the version with
ABIFAGS,
+# so we need to move the debug .pc file to not overwrite it by optimized
install
+mv \
+ %{buildroot}%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/python-%{pybasever}.pc \
+ %{buildroot}%{_libd
[Bug 1223831] Review Request: jersey1 - JAX-RS (JSR 311) production quality Reference Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223831 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1218315 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218315 [Bug 1218315] Update to Jersey 2.x (2.17) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225406] New: Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406 Bug ID: 1225406 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: m...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-jruby-openssl.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-jruby-openssl-0.9.7-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: JRuby-OpenSSL is an add-on gem for JRuby that emulates the Ruby OpenSSL native library. Under the hood uses the Bouncy Castle Crypto APIs. Fedora Account System Username: msrb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225406] Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1198676 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198676 [Bug 1198676] jruby: missing add-on gems -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225406] Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406 Josef Stribny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jstri...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jstri...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Josef Stribny --- I will take it for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969820] Review Request: jclouds - Concurrent API for Cloud Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969820 --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jclouds.spec SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/jclouds-1.9.0-1.fc20.src.rpm - update to 1.9.0 Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9856858 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #57 from Pranav Kant --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: proxychains-ng Short Description: Redirect connections through proxy servers Upstream URL: https://github.com/rofl0r/proxychains-ng Owners: pranvk Branches: f21 f22 InitialCC: mtasaka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 Pranav Kant changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc23.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.20.2) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::Bases) 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::CalcPP) 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::Shortcuts) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(vars) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc23.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert) 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert) = 0.08 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::Bases) = 0.02 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::Bitmaps) = 0.01 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::CalcPP) = 0.02 1 perl(Math::Base::Convert::Shortcuts) = 0.03 1 perl-Math-Base-Convert = 0.08-1.fc23 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Math-Base-Convert* perl-Math-Base-Convert.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thru -> threw, throe, thrum perl-Math-Base-Convert.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US thru -> threw, throe, thrum perl-Math-Base-Convert.noarch: E: useless-provides perl(Math::Base::Convert) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 2 warnings. TODO: Please filter unversioned provide perl(Math::Base::Convert) Otherwise the package is good APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 969820] Review Request: jclouds - Concurrent API for Cloud Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=969820 --- Comment #4 from gil cattaneo --- latest build: Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9857007 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: perl-Math-Base-Convert Short Description: Very fast base to base conversion Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Math-Base-Convert/ Owners: psabata jplesnik ppisar Branches: f21 f22 InitialCC: perl-sig -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1157273] Review Request: conky-manager-deluxepack - Deluxe Conky Manager Pack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157273 --- Comment #5 from Parag AN(पराग) --- if there will be no updates here in next 15 days I am going to remove myself from this review just to make sure I have not to work on this :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1151462] Review Request: belen - GUI of youtube-dl command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1151462 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|panem...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I see this user have many FAS accounts (at least .fas command to bugzilla account name showed many fas names) and not done work to get packager sponsorship. Removing myself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1062315] Review Request: xorg-x11-drv-fbturbo - Xorg X11 fbturbo video driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062315 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(mho...@redhat.com | |) | Last Closed|2014-09-13 17:33:59 |2015-05-27 08:28:31 --- Comment #17 from Parag AN(पराग) --- I am closing this request. If anyone want to package this in Fedora please open a new bugzilla review request. Thanks all. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225406] Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406 --- Comment #2 from Josef Stribny --- * This package is intended for JRuby only and fails on CRuby, so proper Requires: jruby should be used. # irb irb(main):001:0> require 'jopenssl/load' Loading jruby-openssl in a non-JRuby interpreter LoadError: cannot load such file -- java from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require' from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:54:in `require' from /usr/share/gems/gems/jruby-openssl-0.9.7/lib/jopenssl/load.rb:3:in `' from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:128:in `require' from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:128:in `rescue in require' from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:39:in `require' from (irb):1 from /usr/bin/irb:11:in `' * Requires: ruby(release) is auto-generated and should be deleted. * I would appreciate a comment above the following like specifying the referenced library: %global bc_version 1.50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1184446] Review Request: tunir - An ultra light CI system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1184446 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) --- any updates here? can this be closed now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225406] Review Request: rubygem-jruby-openssl - JRuby's OpenSSL gem
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225406 --- Comment #3 from Michal Srb --- Updated spec+srpm: Spec URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/2/rubygem-jruby-openssl.spec SRPM URL: https://msrb.fedorapeople.org/2/rubygem-jruby-openssl-0.9.7-2.fc23.src.rpm %changelog * Wed May 27 2015 Michal Srb - 0.9.7-2 - Explicitly require JRuby - Drop R: ruby(release) - Add comment for %%bc_version -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1220779] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220779 --- Comment #3 from Ding-Yi Chen --- As legal team said, music does not have correct term. Comment #2 also addressed. Spec URL: https://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/7kaa.spec SRPM URL: https://dchen.fedorapeople.org/files/rpms/7kaa-2.14.4-2.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #58 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1113310] Review Request: python-libnacl - Python ctypes wrapper for libsodium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1113310 --- Comment #26 from Erik Johnson --- Sorry for the extended delay on this. Updated SPEC and SRPM with license file added. See below links: SRPM: https://terminalmage.fedorapeople.org/pkg_review/python-libnacl-1.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm SPEC: https://terminalmage.fedorapeople.org/pkg_review/python-libnacl.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225110] Review Request: perl-Math-Base-Convert - Very fast base to base conversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225110 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Math-Base-Convert-0.08-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1205777] Review Request: gap-pkg-autpgrp - Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1205777] Review Request: gap-pkg-autpgrp - Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777 --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- silly question: can you use texlive-pdftex-bin and texlive-tex-bin for re-generate documentation and htm files using make_doc script? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1224385] Review Request: percolator - Software for postprocessing of shotgun proteomics data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224385 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- percolator-2.09.0-4.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222690] Review Request: gap-pkg-fga - Free group algorithms for GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1218025] Review Request: cashe - program and libraries for accessing a CAS cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218025
Pavel Odvody changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||james.ant...@redhat.com
Flags||needinfo?(james.antill@redh
||at.com)
--- Comment #7 from Pavel Odvody ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Dist tag is present.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /root/rpmbuild/cashe/licensecheck.txt
[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python-
cashe
[x]: Packag
[Bug 1221948] Review Request: xdg-app - Application deployment framework for desktop apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221948 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- xdg-app-0.2-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc22 |fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221212] Review Request: nodejs-ansi-regex - Regular expression for matching ANSI escape codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221212 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-ansi-regex-1.1.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168263] Review Request: multistrap - multiple repository bootstrap based on apt
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168263 Bug 1168263 depends on bug 1168260, which changed state. Bug 1168260 Summary: Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the data from a debian Packages.gz https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168260] Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the data from a debian Packages.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-Parse-Debian-Packages- |perl-Parse-Debian-Packages- |0.03-2.fc22 |0.03-2.fc21 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Parse-Debian-Packages-0.03-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1168260] Review Request: perl-Parse-Debian-Packages - Parse the data from a debian Packages.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1168260 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Parse-Debian-Packages- ||0.03-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-05-27 12:10:24 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Parse-Debian-Packages-0.03-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1206946] Review Request: rubygem-occi-cli - Executable OCCI client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206946 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Fixed In Version||rubygem-occi-cli-4.3.1-1.fc ||22 Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-05-27 12:11:04 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-occi-cli-4.3.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221545] Review Request: nodejs-umask - convert umask from string <-> number
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221545 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-umask-1.1.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1196373] Review Request: stockfish - Powerful open source chess engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1196373 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|stockfish-7-0.3.20150506git |stockfish-7-0.3.20150506git |2e86d1f.fc22|2e86d1f.fc21 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- stockfish-7-0.3.20150506git2e86d1f.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194926] Review Request: nodejs-set-immediate-shim - Simple setImmediate shim
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194926 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-set-immediate-shim-1.0.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1205777] Review Request: gap-pkg-autpgrp - Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777
--- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
NOTE: manual review
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1205777-gap-pkg-autpgrp/srpm
/review-gap-pkg-autpgrp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[-]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbi
[Bug 1207847] Review Request: auto - A collection of source code generators for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1207847 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- auto-1.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221272] Review Request: nodejs-hosted-git-info - Provides metadata and conversions from repository urls for Github, Bitbucket and Gitlab
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221272 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-hosted-git-info-2.1.4-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1205777] Review Request: gap-pkg-autpgrp - Compute the automorphism group of a p-Group in GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from gil cattaneo --- approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1223549] Review Request: nodejs-is-object - Checks whether a value is an object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223549 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-is-object-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1224420] Review Request: iio-sensor-proxy - IIO accelerometer sensor to input device proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224420 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- iio-sensor-proxy-1.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1214834] Review Request:fbb - Packet radio mailbox and utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1214834 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc21 |fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc20 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- fbb-7.0.8-0.3.beta.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #59 from Fedora Update System --- proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1166919] Review Request: python-fastcache - C implementation of python3 lru_cache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1166919
--- Comment #21 from Orion Poplawski ---
Would you be okay with this?
--- a/python-fastcache.spec
+++ b/python-fastcache.spec
@@ -6,20 +6,26 @@
Name: python-%{pkgname}
Version:1.0.2
-Release:2%{?dist}
+Release:3%{?dist}
Summary:C implementation of python3 lru_cache
License:MIT
URL:https://github.com/pbrady/%{pkgname}
Source0:
https://github.com/pbrady/%{pkgname}/archive/v%{version}.tar.gz
+%if 0%{?fedora}
+# For py.cleanup
BuildRequires: pycmd
+%endif
BuildRequires: pytest
BuildRequires: python2-devel
BuildRequires: python-setuptools
%if 0%{?with_py3}
+%if 0%{?fedora}
+# For py.cleanup
BuildRequires: python3-pycmd
+%endif
BuildRequires: python3-pytest
BuildRequires: python3-devel
BuildRequires: python3-setuptools
@@ -77,7 +83,9 @@ popd
%check
# Python 2 tests
pushd %{pkgname}-%{version}
+%if 0%{?fedora}
py.cleanup-2.7 -p
+%endif
export PYTHONPATH=build/lib.linux-%{_arch}-2.7/fastcache/tests
py.test-2.7 -v --ignore=fastcache/tests
popd
@@ -85,7 +93,9 @@ popd
%if 0%{?with_py3}
# Python 3 tests
pushd python3-%{pkgname}-%{version}
+%if 0%{?fedora}
py.cleanup-3.4 -p
+%endif
export PYTHONPATH=build/lib.linux-%{_arch}-3.4/fastcache/tests
py.test-3.4 -v --ignore=fastcache/tests
popd
@@ -108,6 +118,9 @@ popd
%endif
%changelog
+* Wed May 27 2015 Orion Poplawski - 1.0.2-3
+- Only run py.cleanup on Fedora
+
* Mon Dec 1 2014 Jerry James - 1.0.2-2
- Be more verbose in the file listing
- Run the tests verbosely
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1147013] Review Request: proxychains-ng - Redirect connections through proxy servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1147013 --- Comment #60 from Fedora Update System --- proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/proxychains-ng-4.8.1-8.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222690] Review Request: gap-pkg-fga - Free group algorithms for GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690
gil cattaneo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
NOTE: manual review
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
Note: Using prebuilt packages
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1222690-gap-pkg-fga/srpm/review-
gap-pkg-fga/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: Using prebuilt rpms.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from
[Bug 1199285] Review request: nodejs-inflight - Add callbacks to requests in flight to avoid async duplication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199285 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199285] Review request: nodejs-inflight - Add callbacks to requests in flight to avoid async duplication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199285 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-inflight-1.0.4-5.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/nodejs-inflight-1.0.4-5.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221293] Review Request: nodejs-normalize-git-url - Normalizes Git URLs. For npm, but you can use it too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293 Zuzana Svetlikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Zuzana Svetlikova --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: nodejs-normalize-git-url Short Description: Normalizes Git URLs. For npm, but you can use it too. Upstream URL: https://github.com/npm/normalize-git-url Owners: zvetlik Branches: f20 f21 f22 el6 epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222690] Review Request: gap-pkg-fga - Free group algorithms for GAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222690 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw --- Tom, do you have time to review this package? It should be pretty straightforward now with the new xmlrpc library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #32 from Richard Shaw --- Are all the blockers resolved at this point? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060852] Review Request: flnet - Amateur Radio Net Control Station
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060852 --- Comment #13 from Richard Shaw --- Do you still see the licensing as a blocker? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #33 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #32) > Are all the blockers resolved at this point? Please, post definitive SPEC/SRPM files. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #34 from Richard Shaw --- SPEC: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flamp.spec SRPM: https://hobbes1069.fedorapeople.org/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21.src.rpm * Wed May 27 2015 Richard Shaw - 2.2.02-2 - Use %%license macro where appropriate. - Update license tag to GPLv3+ which covers the combined work. Hopefully the links work, for some reason my work internet is not letting me go to fedorapeople.org so I constructed them from the previous links. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221293] Review Request: nodejs-normalize-git-url - Normalizes Git URLs. For npm, but you can use it too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221293] Review Request: nodejs-normalize-git-url - Normalizes Git URLs. For npm, but you can use it too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221293 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Tom "spot" Callaway changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #14 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- == REVIEW == Three minor issues: * You've got a typo in the rm of the bundled xmlrpc library. It should be: rm -rf src/xmlrpcpp * Without the xmlrpcpp bits, there is no LGPL code I can see. Drop that from the License: tag. "GPLv3+ and GPLv2+" is correct. * BuildRequires: autoconf automake Don't see those being used. I'm guessing you added these at some point when you were having to regen the configure file. Probably should be removed. Fix these before doing the Fedora builds, please. :) Otherwise APPROVED Good: - rpmlint checks return: fllog.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polymorphism -> polymorphic, polymorphous fllog.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US polymorphism -> polymorphic, polymorphous fllog.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary fllog 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings. All safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (GPLv3+ and GPLv2+) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream (7cac198e0e9def5853a6b3df1ad1968752a90f0d2d3477e071567fdde4c436d3) - package compiles on f22 (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR (except as noted above) - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - no need for -docs - nothing in %doc affects runtime - .desktop okay -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #35 from Antonio Trande --- Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #15 from Richard Shaw --- Ok, all 3 fixed! Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs- --- Comment #16 from Richard Shaw --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: fllog Short Description: Amateur Radio Log Program Upstream URL: http://www.w1hkj.com/ Owners: hobbes1069 Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs- |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #17 from Richard Shaw --- fix cvs flag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Richard Shaw changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #36 from Richard Shaw --- New Package SCM Request === Package Name: flamp Short Description: Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program Upstream URL: http://www.w1hkj.com/ Owners: hobbes1069 Branches: f21 f22 epel7 InitialCC: Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225648] New: Review Request: compat-libvpx1 - Compat package with libvpx libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648 Bug ID: 1225648 Summary: Review Request: compat-libvpx1 - Compat package with libvpx libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: kalevlem...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx1.spec SRPM URL: https://kalev.fedorapeople.org/compat-libvpx1-1.3.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: This is an ABI compatibility package for 3rd party programs that don't follow Fedora release schedule closely. The intention is to keep this package during the F23 lifetime to give 3rd parties time to rebuild their stuff, and retire and obsolete it in F24. Fedora Account System Username: kalev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1225648] Review Request: compat-libvpx1 - Compat package with libvpx libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225648 --- Comment #1 from Kalev Lember --- For reference, here's the diff to the F22 libvpx package: http://paste.fedoraproject.org/226292 I'd like to keep the diff to the original package down to the minimum in order to be able to easily share fixes when needed, so if possible please don't pick on the indentation and things like that that are also present in the original F22 package. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9858842 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1220779] Review Request: 7kaa - Seven Kingdoms: Ancient Adversaries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1220779 --- Comment #4 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to Ding-Yi Chen from comment #3) > As legal team said, music does not have correct term. You could use autodownloader to request from user to download additional (but optional) content. Look at some other packaged games as samples how to do that. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/autodownloader/ Description autodownloader can prompt a user to download additional components and then do the actual download and install off these components. It is intended for software / content which cannot be included into rpms / debs because of licensing reasons. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1223673] Review Request: llvm35 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223673 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1223673] Review Request: llvm35 - The Low Level Virtual Machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1223673 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nonamed...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Mukundan Ragavan --- I would love to do this but I am starting to travel on Friday and going on vacation. I will assign this to myself and try to get this done before I leave. If not, I will get to it at the earliest. If anyone else wants to take a shot, feel free to assign the review to yourself. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #37 from Jon Ciesla --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060920] Review Request: openni2 - OpenNI libraries for 3D-sensing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060920 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093516] Review Request: gringo - Grounding tools for (disjunctive) logic programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093516 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093521] Review Request: clingo - A bottom up grounder for logic programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093521 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093522] Review Request: aspcud - Solver for package dependencies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093522 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1093500] Review Request: clasp - A conflict-driven nogood learning answer set solver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1093500 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richmat...@gmail.com Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055837] Review Request: simbody - Multi-body Physics API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055837 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Flags|needinfo?(richmattes@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #9 from Rich Mattes --- I ran into some bundled libraries that I need to work out, and then this fell off of my priority queue. I'm working on an update with 3.5.2. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1103555] Review Request: fcl - The Flexible Collision Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1103555 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 829097] Review Request: sicktoolbox - The SICK LIDAR Toolbox
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829097 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1224390] Review Request: ignition-math - Small, Fast, High Performance Math Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1224390 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 674008] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=674008 Rich Mattes changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1225692 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1225692 [Bug 1225692] Tracker for Fedora Robotics SIG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1173625] Review Request: fcitx-qt5 - Fcitx IM module for Qt5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1173625 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from Robin Lee --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9859423 Scratch build succeeded. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System --- flamp-2.2.02-2.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System --- flamp-2.2.02-2.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060804] Review Request: flamp - Amateur Multicast Protocol - file transfer program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060804 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System --- flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/flamp-2.2.02-2.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- fllog-1.2.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 21. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.fc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- fllog-1.2.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 22. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.fc22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- fllog-1.2.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update for Fedora EPEL 7. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/fllog-1.2.0-1.el7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1060817] Review Request: fllog - Amateur Radio Log Program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060817 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
