[Bug 1255973] Review Request: libndn-cxx - C++ library, implementing Named Data Networking (NDN) primitives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973



--- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
susmit's scratch build of libndn-cxx-0.3.4-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11228668

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246903] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-openweather - an extension to display weather information from many locations in the world

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246903

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #42 from Fedora Update System  ---
gnome-shell-extension-openweather-1-0.4.20150924gite55253e.fc21 has been pushed
to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update
gnome-shell-extension-openweather'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9fd324e09e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262468] Review Request: php-punic - PHP-Unicode CLDR

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262468



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-punic-1.6.3-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-punic'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16594

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262469] Review Request: php-patchwork-utf8 - Portable and performant UTF-8, Unicode and Grapheme Clusters for PHP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262469



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-patchwork-utf8-1.2.3-3.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-patchwork-utf8'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16597

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261472] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast - Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261472



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1244764] Review Request: rubygem-diffy - Convenient diffing in ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1244764] Review Request: rubygem-diffy - Convenient diffing in ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Hi Ilya,

I see you posted several informal reviews as well as other packages, so to keep
you busy, I sponsored you into packagers group.

And since this package looks good, I also APPROVE this package. Feel free to
continue with SCM request [1] and let me know should you have any issues
importing your first package.


[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Add_Package_to_Source_Code_Management_.28SCM.29_system_and_Set_Owner

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266186] Review Request: jeromq - Pure Java implementation of libzmq

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266186

Michael Simacek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||msima...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|msima...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1244760] Review Request: rubygem-six - Very simple authorization gem

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244760

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #10 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Thanks. I sponsored you and APPROVE this package, please continue with the SCM
procedure.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212835] Review Request: castxml - C-family abstract syntax tree XML output tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212835



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
castxml-0.1-0.6.20150924git552dd69.fc23 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-6eddeb8faf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212835] Review Request: castxml - C-family abstract syntax tree XML output tool

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212835

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264656] Review Request: rubygem-ace-rails-ap - The Ajax.org Cloud9 Editor.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264656

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com



--- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Just a few quick points:

* What about test suite?
* How about bundling? This directory looks suspicious: %{gem_instdir}/vendor
* You list several BuildRequires which you definitely don't need ATM, since you
don't execute the test suite.
* We typically try to avoid build time dependency on Bundler as much as
possible. Not sure this will be the case, but its always worth asking.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264661] Review Request: rubygem-generator_spec - Test Rails generators with RSpec

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264661

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Hi Ilya,

does it actually build in Koji? I am asking since I see BR: rubygem(bundler)
but no other treatment. This typically means that some dependencies are pulled
in during build, but this is not possible on Koji, since it has no network
access.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266186] Review Request: jeromq - Pure Java implementation of libzmq

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266186



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
msimacek's scratch build of jeromq-0.3.5-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11225474

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264660] Review Request: rubygem-mini_magick - Manipulate images

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264660

Vít Ondruch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vondr...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Vít Ondruch  ---
Hi Ilya,

is the BR: rubygem(rake) required? We usually try to avoid dependency on Rake,
since it tends to pull in more then necessary for build. Moreover, you don't
execute any Rake command ...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1255973] Review Request: libndn-cxx - C++ library, implementing Named Data Networking (NDN) primitives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973



--- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande  ---
1 test fails on rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1265326] Review Request: nodejs-node-error-ex - Easy error subclassing and stack customization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265326

Tom Hughes  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes  ---
That looks good now. Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261537] Review Request: libs3 - C Library and Tools for Amazon S3 Access

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261537



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
libs3-2.0-0.2.20150902git247ba1b.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update libs3'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16482

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1265636] Review Request: google-roboto-mono-fonts - Google Roboto Mono fonts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265636



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
google-roboto-mono-fonts-2.000986-0.1.20150923git.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-roboto-mono-fonts'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16534

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1265484] Review Request: google-roboto-slab-fonts - Google Roboto Slab fonts

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265484



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
google-roboto-slab-fonts-1.100263-0.3.20150923git.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update google-roboto-slab-fonts'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16532

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261166] Review Request: nodejs-commoner - Tool for translating any dialect of JavaScript to Node CommonJS modules

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261166



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-commoner-0.10.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-commoner'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16463

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246903] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-openweather - an extension to display weather information from many locations in the world

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246903



--- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System  ---
gnome-shell-extension-openweather-1-0.4.20150924gite55253e.fc23 has been pushed
to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make
note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update
gnome-shell-extension-openweather'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b1d32ed839

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262468] Review Request: php-punic - PHP-Unicode CLDR

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262468



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-punic-1.6.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-punic'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16596

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258955] Review Request: php-icewind-streams - A set of generic stream wrappers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258955

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258899] Review Request: php-jeremeamia-superclosure - Serialize Closure objects, including their context and binding

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258899



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-jeremeamia-superclosure-2.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1245932] Review Request: shairplay - Apple airplay and raop protocol server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245932



--- Comment #13 from William Moreno  ---
The appdate dile says:

AirTV is a Qt GUI to start a RAOP server. AirTV Qt is a GUI to start a RAOP
server. Once started, AirTV will add an icon to the system tray using  which
you can stop the server.

Please remove the duplicate line, note than this is not a bloquer but fix it
before send the build to koji

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1245932] Review Request: shairplay - Apple airplay and raop protocol server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245932

William Moreno  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #14 from William Moreno  ---
PACKAGE APROVED
===

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258955] Review Request: php-icewind-streams - A set of generic stream wrappers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258955



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-icewind-streams-0.2.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258899] Review Request: php-jeremeamia-superclosure - Serialize Closure objects, including their context and binding

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258899

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1245932] Review Request: shairplay - Apple airplay and raop protocol server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245932



--- Comment #12 from William Moreno  ---
1- This app build in all suported Fedoras:
http://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/williamjmorenor/fedora-review-test/monitor/

2- This app build in 
ARM:   http://arm.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3201533
PPC:   http://ppc.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2768443
s390:  http://s390.koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1951448

I did not find bundled libs in the source (a bit +1 to upstream) and I do not
find bloquers so I will re run a fedora-review because the spec change a lot
since last full review.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1255973] Review Request: libndn-cxx - C++ library, implementing Named Data Networking (NDN) primitives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1255973



--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
susmit's scratch build of libndn-cxx-0.3.4-2.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11231215

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262469] Review Request: php-patchwork-utf8 - Portable and performant UTF-8, Unicode and Grapheme Clusters for PHP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262469



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-patchwork-utf8-1.2.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update php-patchwork-utf8'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16599

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258056] Review Request: nodejs-fg-lodash - FG variant of lodash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056



--- Comment #2 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
Tried 3 times but looks like fedora-review is taking too too much time to
complete.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
preprocess-1.2.1-3.20150914gitb23422.fc22 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-01bbb8b872

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258056] Review Request: nodejs-fg-lodash - FG variant of lodash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
Thanks. Finally got it working.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/parag/1258056-nodejs-fg-
 lodash/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless 

[Bug 1258062] Review Request: nodejs-requestretry - Request-retry wrap nodejs request to retry http(s) requests in case of error

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258062

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
This package is missing for tests
BuildRequires: npm(request)

I added it and proceed with the review of this package as

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
  Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
  See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines

==> This is expected as dependent package nodejs-fg-lodash is not available for
   installation

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in /home/parag/rpmbuild/SPECS/nodejs-
 requestretry/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright 

[Bug 1265326] Review Request: nodejs-node-error-ex - Easy error subclassing and stack customization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265326

Parag Nemade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #7 from Parag Nemade  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: nodejs-error-ex
Short Description: Easy error subclassing and stack customization
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Qix-/node-error-ex
Owners: pnemade
Branches: f23
InitialCC:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266336] Review Request: Mass review exception : php-zendframework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266336

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||panem...@gmail.com



--- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---
I just wonder is there any guidelines on how to request SCM here for such mass
review requests? Can it be added on
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests page?

Not sure if git-process-requests script is capable of handling such requests.

Why for such requests a common Sort Description is used? or are we relying here
on pkgdb_updater script to correct the package description here?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067

Ding-Yi Chen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||dc...@redhat.com
  Flags|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #8 from Ding-Yi Chen  ---
New Package CVS Request
===
Package Name: ocaml-ounit
Short Description: Unit test framework for OCaml
Owners: rjones dchen
Branches: epel7 el6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751119] Review Request: perl-Judy - Perl wrapper for Judy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119

Jan Holcapek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #18 from Jan Holcapek  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Judy
Short Description: Perl wrapper for Judy
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Judy/
Owners: holcapek
Branches: f21 f22 f23 el6 epel7
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263600] Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX - Log4perl appender for writing to UNIX domain sockets

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263600

Jan Holcapek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-cvs?



--- Comment #6 from Jan Holcapek  ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX
Short Description: Log4perl appender for writing to UNIX domain sockets
Upstream URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX/
Owners: holcapek
Branches: f21 f22 f23 el6 epel7
InitialCC: perl-sig

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263938] Review Request: perl-Etsy-StatsD - Object-Oriented Client for Etsy's StatsD Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263938



--- Comment #2 from Jan Holcapek  ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * The license is unclear -- while the README file and CPAN metadata claim
> the package is distributed under the `perl' license (generally understood as
> `GPL+ or Artistic'), the bundled license text is for `Artistic 2.0'. 
> Please, ask upstream when they really meant.

Waiting for their reply.

> * %description needs to end with a fullstop.
>   In your case, consider simple `%{summary}.'
> 
> * Feel free to use the more common DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT.
> 
> * Missing build deps ;)
>   - coreutils, called in spec, line 32
>   - findutils, ditto
>   - make, called in spec, lines 27, 30 and 37
>   - perl(IO::Socket::INET), lib/Etsy/StatsD.pm:35
> 
> * For obvious reasons, the automatic generators won't find that
> IO::Socket::INET dependency for you.  You'll have to require it explicitly.

All above fixed.

> * Note: at the moment, the statsd package provides the `perl(Etsy::StatsD)'
> symbol.  This is a bug.  Reported as #1263969.

Good catch!

Spec URL:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/holcapek/perl-Etsy-StatsD/master/perl-Etsy-StatsD.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/holcapek/perl-Etsy-StatsD/raw/master/perl-Etsy-StatsD-1.001-2.fc21.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266392] New: Review Request: PhantomJS-2 - PhantomJS2 for rhel7

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266392

Bug ID: 1266392
   Summary: Review Request: PhantomJS-2 - PhantomJS2 for rhel7
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: kerne...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



SRPM URL:
https://github.com/kerneliq/PhantomJS/blob/master/phantomjs-2.0.1-1.src.rpm
Description: PhantomJS2 for rhel7
Fedora Account System Username:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1208101] Review Request: libbson - Building, parsing, and iterating BSON documents

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208101



--- Comment #13 from Daniel Kopeček  ---
Looks like yajl upstream is alive:
https://github.com/lloyd/yajl/issues/161#issuecomment-143094168

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-09-25 03:57:51



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261472] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast - Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261472



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261472] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast - Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261472

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2015-09-25 03:58:30



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250887] Review Request: preprocess - A portable multi-language file Python2 preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250887
Bug 1250887 depends on bug 1250884, which changed state.

Bug 1250884 Summary: Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 
compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
future-0.15.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk2 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (2.x)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fed...@famillecollet.com



--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet  ---
I'm a bit confused..
How is this going to be updated ?

Does yum/dnf will pull new php-aws-sdk version 3  (especially if some package
requires v3)

Or does yum/dnf wil replace it with php-aws-sdk2 (especially if some package
will requires v2)

I need to think more... (Perhaps a stupid idea is to use another top dir, to
allow both installation, as consumer will use the provided autoload, perhaps
better to create a php-aws-sdk3, really don't know)

> Many packages 
Which ?
It seems only owncloud use it (for now)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264653] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-guzzle5 - PHP HTTP client and webservice framework (5.x)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264653

Remi Collet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||fed...@famillecollet.com



--- Comment #1 from Remi Collet  ---
Of course... same questions that for php-aws-sdk2 (#1264654)

Seems only used by php-aws-sdk.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266124] Review Request: perl-Algorithm-Diff-XS - Algorithm::Diff with XS core loop

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266124



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Algorithm-Diff-XS-0.04-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7d1e633f68

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1261472] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast - Faster implementation of HTTP::Headers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261472



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-HTTP-Headers-Fast-0.19-1.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263938] Review Request: perl-Etsy-StatsD - Object-Oriented Client for Etsy's StatsD Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263938



--- Comment #3 from Petr Šabata  ---
(In reply to Jan Holcapek from comment #2)
> > * %description needs to end with a fullstop.
> >   In your case, consider simple `%{summary}.'
> > 
> > * Feel free to use the more common DESTDIR rather than PERL_INSTALL_ROOT.
> > 
> > * Missing build deps ;)
> >   - coreutils, called in spec, line 32
> >   - findutils, ditto
> >   - make, called in spec, lines 27, 30 and 37
> >   - perl(IO::Socket::INET), lib/Etsy/StatsD.pm:35
> > 
> > * For obvious reasons, the automatic generators won't find that
> > IO::Socket::INET dependency for you.  You'll have to require it explicitly.
> 
> All above fixed.

Ack.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266186] Review Request: jeromq - Pure Java implementation of libzmq

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266186



--- Comment #2 from Michael Simacek  ---
(In reply to Upstream Release Monitoring from comment #1)
> msimacek's scratch build of jeromq-0.3.5-1.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11225474

Multiple tests fail in koji and some other tests fail for me locally, I'd
suggest disabling them (probably entirely).

According to comments in Java files, the license should be LGPLv3+.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751119] Review Request: perl-Judy - Perl wrapper for Judy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119



--- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
holcapek's scratch build of perl-Judy-0.41-3.fc21.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11222466

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263600] Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX - Log4perl appender for writing to UNIX domain sockets

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263600

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1263600] Review Request: perl-Log-Log4perl-Appender-Socket-UNIX - Log4perl appender for writing to UNIX domain sockets

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263600



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266336] Review Request: Mass review exception : php-zendframework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266336

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266336] Review Request: Mass review exception : php-zendframework

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266336



--- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla  ---
WARNING: Ticket is not assigned to anyone.
WARNING: fedora-review flag not set
WARNING: Requested package name ** see above list ** doesn't match bug summary
Mass

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1250884] Review Request: future - Easy, clean, reliable Python 2/3 compatibility

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250884



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
future-0.15.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262807] Review Request: php-udan11-sql-parser - A validating SQL lexer and parser with a focus on MySQL dialect

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262807

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1244764] Review Request: rubygem-diffy - Convenient diffing in ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244764



--- Comment #12 from Ilya Gradina  ---
Hi Vit,

Thank you!)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266186] Review Request: jeromq - Pure Java implementation of libzmq

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266186



--- Comment #3 from Mikolaj Izdebski  ---
Thanks. All tests pass on my system. Next week I will see what can be done
about running or skipping them in Koji.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262807] Review Request: php-udan11-sql-parser - A validating SQL lexer and parser with a focus on MySQL dialect

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262807



--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-udan11-sql-parser-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-16382

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262807] Review Request: php-udan11-sql-parser - A validating SQL lexer and parser with a focus on MySQL dialect

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262807



--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-udan11-sql-parser-1.0.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8185

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262807] Review Request: php-udan11-sql-parser - A validating SQL lexer and parser with a focus on MySQL dialect

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262807



--- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-udan11-sql-parser-1.0.0-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8186

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266429] New: Review Request: cmark - CommonMark parsing and rendering

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429

Bug ID: 1266429
   Summary: Review Request: cmark - CommonMark parsing and
rendering
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: peter...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//cmark.spec
SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//cmark-0.22.0-1.fc22.src.rpm

Description:
`cmark` is the C reference implementation of CommonMark,
a rationalized version of Markdown syntax with a spec.

It provides a shared library (`libcmark`) with functions for parsing
CommonMark documents to an abstract syntax tree (AST), manipulating
the AST, and rendering the document to HTML, groff man, LaTeX,
CommonMark, or an XML representation of the AST.  It also provides a
command-line program (`cmark`) for parsing and rendering CommonMark
documents.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266429] Review Request: cmark - CommonMark parsing and rendering

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
petersen's scratch build of cmark-0.22.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11223872

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266429] Review Request: cmark - CommonMark parsing and rendering

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429



--- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen  ---
This is needed for the Haskell cmark library (to avoid bundling),
which in turn is needed by the latest version of pandoc
(for its CommonMark reader and writer I guess).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241473



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 241473] Review Request: ocaml-ssl - SSL bindings for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241473

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 445067] Review Request: ocaml-ounit - Unit test framework for OCaml

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445067



--- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1266142] Review Request: perl-Crypt-GCrypt - Perl interface to libgcrypt library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266142

Petr Pisar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Crypt-GCrypt-1.26-1.fc
   ||24
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2015-09-25 06:29:17



--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar  ---
Thank you for the review and the repository. I added the optional test
dependencies.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751119] Review Request: perl-Judy - Perl wrapper for Judy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119

Jon Ciesla  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 751119] Review Request: perl-Judy - Perl wrapper for Judy

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751119



--- Comment #19 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262468] Review Request: php-punic - PHP-Unicode CLDR

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262468

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-punic-1.6.3-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update php-punic'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8218

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1258056] Review Request: nodejs-fg-lodash - FG variant of lodash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258056

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262469] Review Request: php-patchwork-utf8 - Portable and performant UTF-8, Unicode and Grapheme Clusters for PHP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262469

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-patchwork-utf8-1.2.3-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update php-patchwork-utf8'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8219

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1262468] Review Request: php-punic - PHP-Unicode CLDR

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262468



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-punic-1.6.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
If you want to test the update, you can install it with
$ su -c 'yum --enablerepo=epel-testing update php-punic'
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-8217

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review