[Bug 1258160] Review Request: nodejs-sinon - Test spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258160 --- Comment #6 from Piotr Popieluch --- I'm sorry, I mixed up. Latest release is 1.17.0. Spec URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-sinon.spec SRPM URL: https://piotrp.fedorapeople.org/nodejs-sinon-1.17.0-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230445] Review Request: officeparser - Parse the format of OLE compound documents used by MS Office applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230445 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- officeparser-0.20140818-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1230445] Review Request: officeparser - Parse the format of OLE compound documents used by MS Office applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1230445 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-10-12 02:28:17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264199] Review Request: php-wikimedia-avro - A library for using Avro with PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264199 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-10-12 02:27:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264209] Review Request: php-wikimedia-ip-set - Library to match IP addresses against CIDR specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-wikimedia-ip-set-0-0.1.20150917git.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264199] Review Request: php-wikimedia-avro - A library for using Avro with PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264199 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-wikimedia-avro-1.7.7-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264209] Review Request: php-wikimedia-ip-set - Library to match IP addresses against CIDR specifications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264209 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-10-12 02:27:40 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1267233] Review Request: php-sebastian-resource-operations - Provides a list of PHP built-in functions that operate on resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267233 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-sebastian-resource-operations-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15985bd732 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1267233] Review Request: php-sebastian-resource-operations - Provides a list of PHP built-in functions that operate on resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267233 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-sebastian-resource-operations-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-3cee5cb4e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1267233] Review Request: php-sebastian-resource-operations - Provides a list of PHP built-in functions that operate on resources
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267233 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-sebastian-resource-operations-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-15985bd732 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268683] Review Request: php-composer-semver - Semver library that offers utilities, version constraint parsing and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268683 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-composer-semver-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a32377cf25 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-composer-semver-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-08f9bde20c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268683] Review Request: php-composer-semver - Semver library that offers utilities, version constraint parsing and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268683 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-composer-semver-1.0.0-1.fc21 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 21. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-a32377cf25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268683] Review Request: php-composer-semver - Semver library that offers utilities, version constraint parsing and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268683 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268683] Review Request: php-composer-semver - Semver library that offers utilities, version constraint parsing and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268683 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-composer-semver-1.0.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1218ed6516 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269287] Review Request: nodejs-when - A lightweight Promises/A+ and when() implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269287 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-when-3.7.3-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-when' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2fc879f3fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269559] Review Request: nodejs-basic-auth - Basic auth Authorization header field parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269559 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-basic-auth-1.0.3-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-basic-auth' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b17d0e43fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269620] Review Request: nodejs-content-type - Create and parse HTTP Content-Type header
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269620 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-content-type-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-content-type' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-8a6e0219e8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1262470] Review Request: python-PyPDF2 - A pure Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- python-PyPDF2-1.25.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PyPDF2' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-9eeaab33ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247328] Review Request: sshrc - Bring your bash and vim configuration in your ssh session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- sshrc-0.5-5.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update sshrc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-34726d78b4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259510] Review Request: gdalcpp - C++11 wrapper classes for GDAL/OGR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259510 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gdalcpp-0-0.1.20150825git75c0ac4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update gdalcpp' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-098cec28bb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269648] Review Request: nodejs-ee-first - Get the first event in a set of event emitters and event pairs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269648 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-ee-first-1.1.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-ee-first' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0d7c83eb79 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259543] Review Request: cachedir - A tiny utility for tagging directories as cache directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259543 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- cachedir-1.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186560] Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s) <-> PC communication program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186560 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- tilp2-1.17-4.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198760] Review Request: mitmproxy - An interactive SSL-capable intercepting HTTP proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198760 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol ||ter.ch) --- Comment #9 from Michal Ambroz --- Ping? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270630] Unretiring Review Request: valabind - Review Request: valabind - Transform vala or vapi files into swig, C++, NodeJS-ffi, or GIR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added CC||re...@seznam.cz Blocks||1270622 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622 [Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1270630 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630 [Bug 1270630] Unretiring Review Request: valabind - Review Request: valabind - Transform vala or vapi files into swig, C++, NodeJS-ffi, or GIR -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270630] New: Unretiring Review Request: valabind - Review Request: valabind - Transform vala or vapi files into swig, C++, NodeJS-ffi, or GIR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270630 Bug ID: 1270630 Summary: Unretiring Review Request: valabind - Review Request: valabind - Transform vala or vapi files into swig, C++, NodeJS-ffi, or GIR Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: re...@seznam.cz QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/valabind.spec SRPM URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/valabind-0.9.2-1.fc21.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: rebus Description: Valabind is a tool to parse vala[1] or vapi files to transform them into swig[2] interface files, C++, NodeJS-ffi or GIR. With swig, you can create language bindings for any API written in vala or C with a vapi interface. It can also generate bindings for C++. Hello, this is package review request as following the unetiring policy: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package With the current release of valabind 0.9.2 it seems to build nicely with recent vala a in rawhide and recent versions of Fedora, so I would like to unretire the package and become owner of this orphaned package. Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410814 Best regards Michal Ambroz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270554] Review Request: Haxe - Multi-target universal programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270554 --- Comment #2 from Andy Li --- The url to the raw spec is https://build.opensuse.org/source/home:onthewings/haxe/haxe.spec Hope it works for you. Best regards, Andy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1162816 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1162816 [Bug 1162816] valabind cannot be installed on F21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270622] Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622 Michal Ambroz changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1130396 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1130396 [Bug 1130396] Valabind FTBFS with Vala 0.25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270622] New: Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270622 Bug ID: 1270622 Summary: Review Request: sdb - The string database from radare reverse engineering framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: re...@seznam.cz QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/sdb.spec SRPM URL: https://rebus.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/sdb-0.9.8-1.0e133f1.fc21.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: rebus Description: The sdb is a simple string key/value database based on djb's cdb disk storage and supports JSON and arrays introspection. The mcsdbd is a memcache server with disk storage based on sdb. It is distributed as a standalone binary and a library. There's also the sdbtypes: a vala library that implements several data structures on top of an sdb or a memcache instance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1203501] Review Request: rubygem-async_sinatra - Sinatra plugin to perform asynchronous responses inside of the Sinatra framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203501 --- Comment #3 from Graeme Gillies --- Apologies for not replying to this sooner. I have updated the spec file to drop the Group tag, and I'm not sure why rpmlint complains about gem_install macro as I am already using it http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-async_sinatra.spec http://ggillies.fedorapeople.org//rubygem-async_sinatra-1.1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Regards, Graeme -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186560] Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s) <-> PC communication program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186560 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- tilp2-1.17-4.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098965] Review Request: capstone - Multi-platform, multi-architecture disassembly framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098965 --- Comment #17 from Michal Ambroz --- Hello, I can see that Siddharth Sharma (siddharth@gmail.com) was originally doing the review. Then it moved to falo...@redhat.com then to you. If nobody else is interested, then I can take over the review. Is that OK? Mik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270531] Review Request: gfeedline - Social Networking Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270531 --- Comment #3 from Nuno Dias --- Haïkel, thanks for the advices. I addressed all the issues you mention, and created a new RPM, also build in koji. http://rpms.lip.pt/pub/f22/src/gfeedline-2.4.6-4.fc22.src.rpm http://rpms.lip.pt/pub/f22/src/gfeedline.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270531] Review Request: gfeedline - Social Networking Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270531 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- nunodias's scratch build of gfeedline-2.4.6-4.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410546 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270554] Review Request: Haxe - Multi-target universal programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270554 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||projects...@smart.ms --- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner --- Please use a valid Spec URL that gives raw content, fedora-review is not able to read html formatted pages, therefore you can ask for some space at fedorapeople.org . Otherwise, I am interested in doing the official review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 --- Comment #16 from Shawn Iwinski --- SCM request submitted via pkgdb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 Jon Ciesla changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-cvs? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 --- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla --- This SCM request method has been deprecated. Please see https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageDB_admin_requests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444
--- Comment #11 from Raphael Groner ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package installs properly.
Note: Installation errors (see attachment)
See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file COPYING is marked as %doc instead of %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- License tag is invalid, use GPLv2+ instead of GPL2+
- Add Requires: dbus systemd
- Add other missing folders ownership into %files
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[?]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[?]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 27 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/builder/fedora-
review/CPUFreqUtility/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/dbus-1/system.d
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/polkit-1/actions,
/usr/share/dbus-1/system-services, /usr/share/dbus-1, /etc/dbus-1,
/etc/dbus-1/system.d, /usr/share/polkit-1
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[?]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Fully versioned dependency
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- raphgro's scratch build of CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11410359 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 shawn iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-cvs? --- Comment #14 from shawn iwinski --- THANKS for the review!!! New Package SCM Request === Package Name: php-phpoffice-phpexcel Short Description: A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files Upstream URL: https://github.com/PHPOffice/PHPExcel Owners: siwinski Branches: f21 f22 f23 el6 epel7 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269287] Review Request: nodejs-when - A lightweight Promises/A+ and when() implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269287 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-when-3.7.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-when' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0e7bc9de20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #13 from Remi Collet --- Everything ok. No Blocker === APPROVED === -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269648] Review Request: nodejs-ee-first - Get the first event in a set of event emitters and event pairs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269648 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-ee-first-1.1.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-ee-first' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-b71fcaf0a2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269559] Review Request: nodejs-basic-auth - Basic auth Authorization header field parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269559 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-basic-auth-1.0.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-basic-auth' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-021c9965ec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269620] Review Request: nodejs-content-type - Create and parse HTTP Content-Type header
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269620 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-content-type-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update nodejs-content-type' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-27b6e11e27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259510] Review Request: gdalcpp - C++11 wrapper classes for GDAL/OGR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259510 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- gdalcpp-0-0.1.20150825git75c0ac4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update gdalcpp' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-e950c3019d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1262470] Review Request: python-PyPDF2 - A pure Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- python-PyPDF2-1.25.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PyPDF2' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-bf9da150ca -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 --- Comment #12 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1081804 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1081804&action=edit review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.5.3 (bcf15e3) last change: 2015-05-04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247328] Review Request: sshrc - Bring your bash and vim configuration in your ssh session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- sshrc-0.5-5.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update sshrc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-507cc2fb4d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1102942] Review Request: php-phpoffice-phpexcel - A pure PHP library for reading and writing spreadsheet files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1102942 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #11 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1081803 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1081803&action=edit phpci.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.1 DB built Oct 11 2015 19:05:51 CEST static analyze results -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner --- The Spec URL does not return raw content. You may use instead: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #8 from Raphael Groner --- You should activate your FAS: [20:25:11] fasinfo flash [20:25:13] User: flash, Name: Jose J. Colmenares S., email: $address, Creation: 2009-05-30, IRC Nick: None, Timezone: UTC, Locale: C, GPG key ID: None, Status: inactive [20:25:17] Approved Groups: cla_fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1247328] Review Request: sshrc - Bring your bash and vim configuration in your ssh session
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1247328 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- sshrc-0.5-5.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update sshrc' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-c39448d325 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259510] Review Request: gdalcpp - C++11 wrapper classes for GDAL/OGR
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259510 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- gdalcpp-0-0.1.20150825git75c0ac4.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update gdalcpp' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-46f8f63b64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1262470] Review Request: python-PyPDF2 - A pure Python library built as a PDF toolkit
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-PyPDF2-1.25.1-2.fc21 has been pushed to the Fedora 21 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update python-PyPDF2' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-04d77a0207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 --- Comment #15 from Jens Lody --- Thanks for clarification ! I totally overread, that this part of the guidelines is only valid for renaming/replacing packages. I was too much focused on the explicit provides, and I did not find any other place in the docs where it is explained when to provide what, at least nothing about when to use arch-(in-)dependant provides. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268683] Review Request: php-composer-semver - Semver library that offers utilities, version constraint parsing and validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268683 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- Thanks for the review. SCN request open on pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186560] Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s) <-> PC communication program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186560 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-10-11 12:05:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259543] Review Request: cachedir - A tiny utility for tagging directories as cache directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259543 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-10-11 12:05:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1186560] Review Request: tilp2 - Texas Instruments handheld(s) <-> PC communication program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1186560 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- tilp2-1.17-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1259543] Review Request: cachedir - A tiny utility for tagging directories as cache directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259543 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- cachedir-1.2-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197505] Review Request: libnfs - Client library for accessing NFS shares over a network
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197505 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- libnfs-1.9.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 --- Comment #14 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) --- The Renaming/Replacing packages guidelines do not apply here at all. This is a new package request, not a rename of an existing package. When renaming a package, the Obsoletes tag is not arch-specific and causes removal of packages of *any* arch, and the explicit Provides is what the package resolver may look at to decide whether to pull in the renamed package or not. When renaming a package, that's an opportunity to keep only the more strict dependencies, i.e. arch-specific ones instead of based on %name (*if* nothing else depends on the old %name), and have a package updater pull in only the new package for the arch that's really needed. However, the pair of Obsoletes/Provides is supposed to be temporary/short-lived anyway (with explicit dependencies switching to use the new names if necessary). [...] Those explicit Provides don't add much value. Only due to the mixed case of the "abcMIDI" name of the physical package, the lower-case "abcmidi" Provides can help when searching packages using a tool that isn't case-insensitive. Also notice: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#General_Naming and https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Case_Sensitivity Lower-case naming is preferred, but the guidelines are afraid of making it mandatory, because it might annoy a few project upstreams, who are fond of their mixed-cased names. The mixed-case spelling is not used everywhere. It's /usr/bin/abc2midi not /usr/bin/abc2MIDI, and the home page refers to the "ABC" standard while using a lower-case "abc" everywhere else. Maybe there's a preference for "abcMIDI" as the project name, but I don't think it's a big deal, since the tools have lower-case names. > $ rpm -q --provides abcmidi > package abcmidi is not installed "rpm -q --provides" queries physical packages. In this case, "abcmidi" is not a package name, but a package capability (here used as a virtual package name). You would need to query via "rpm -q --whatprovides abcmidi": $ rpm -q --provides ldconfig package ldconfig is not installed $ rpm -q --whatprovides ldconfig glibc-2.21-8.fc22.x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 --- Comment #13 from Jens Lody --- I see that it in fact happens this way, but I think the guidelines are a little bit unclear in this case: From https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages : "Examples of packages that should explicitly provide only arch-specific Provides: include native code libraries or plug-ins and their associated -devel packages. Packages that should explicitly provide only arch-independent Provides: include most stand-alone programs (in addition to all noarch packages). Even though these programs may themselves be arch-specific, clients that run them should not care about their arch in most cases. A package that explicitly provides, for example, both a native code library as well as an interpreted language interface to that library should have both arch-specific (for clients of the native code library) and arch-independent (for clients of the interpreted language interface) Provides:." abcmidi only installs stand-alone programs as far as I see. By the way after installing the package I get: [jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcmidi package abcmidi is not installed [jens@localhost ~]$ rpm -q --provides abcMIDI abcMIDI = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcMIDI(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcmidi = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 abcmidi(x86-64) = 2015.08.31-1.fc22 That looks like something does not work correctly or am I missing something ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270592] Review Request: python-parallel-ssh - Asynchronous parallel SSH library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270592 --- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ignatenkobrain's scratch build of python-parallel-ssh-0.80.1-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11409110 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270592] Review Request: python-parallel-ssh - Asynchronous parallel SSH library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270592 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11409110 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270592] New: Review Request: python-parallel-ssh - Asynchronous parallel SSH library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270592 Bug ID: 1270592 Summary: Review Request: python-parallel-ssh - Asynchronous parallel SSH library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-parallel-ssh.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/python-parallel-ssh-0.80.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Library for running asynchronous parallel SSH commands over many hosts. parallel-ssh uses asychronous network requests - there is no multi-threading or multi-processing used. This is a requirement for commands on many (hundreds/thousands/hundreds of thousands) of hosts which would grind a system to a halt simply by having so many processes/threads all wanting to execute if done with multi-threading/processing. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410
--- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group)
---
> Provides: abcmidi = %{version}-%{release}
> Provides: abcmidi%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> can the pakage be arch-dependent and arch-independent the same time ?
Yes and no. ;-)
First of all, those two Provides are automatic for every binary package you
build. They are automatic for every package %name and subpackage %name. See
e.g.
$ rpm -q --provides glibc|grep ^glibc
glibc = 2.21-8.fc22
glibc(x86-64) = 2.21-8.fc22
or any other binary package.
Secondly, the first Provides does not really mean the package is fully
arch-independent. It is not a "noarch" build. The build is not published in the
repos of any arch either. Only in multiarch repos, there's a slight chance that
somebody may depend on this "thing" without specifying arch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added CC|kaperan...@gmail.com| Assignee|kaperan...@gmail.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1065054] Review Request: virt-sandbox-runner - Qt wrapper for virt-sandbox utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065054 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |EOL Last Closed||2015-10-11 07:31:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1117223] Review Request: kronometer - A simple KDE stopwatch application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1117223 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1258160] Review Request: nodejs-sinon - Test spies, stubs and mocks for JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258160 --- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes --- That is actually 1.17.0 by the looks of it, but 1.17.1 seems to be missing from the github repo? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fl@sh changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(kaperang07@gmail. | |com)| --- Comment #7 from Fl@sh --- Newest: Spec URL: https://github.com/F1ash/CPUFreqUtility/blob/master/CPUFreqUtility.spec SRPM URL: https://f1ash.fedorapeople.org/CPUFreqUtility/CPUFreqUtility-1.4.3-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886322] Review Request: mingw-nss - MinGW build of Network Security Services
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886322 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fiden...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Fabiano Fidêncio --- Just updating the Spec and SRPM files: Spec URL: https://fidencio.fedorapeople.org/fedora/mingw-nss/mingw-nss.spec SPRM URL: https://fidencio.fedorapeople.org/fedora/mingw-nss/mingw-nss-3.20-1.fc24.src.rpm Builds fine on rawhide with updated mingw-nspr from bug 886320. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 886320] Review Request: mingw-nspr - MinGW build of Netscape Portable Runtime
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=886320 Fabiano Fidêncio changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fiden...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Fabiano Fidêncio --- Just updating the Spec and SRPM files: Spec URL: https://fidencio.fedorapeople.org/fedora/mingw-nspr/mingw-nspr.spec SPRM URL: https://fidencio.fedorapeople.org/fedora/mingw-nspr/mingw-nspr-4.10.9-1.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410 Jens Lody changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|thatsly...@gmail.com|fed...@jenslody.de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257410] Review Request: abcMIDI - ABC to/from MIDI conversion utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257410
Jens Lody changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fed...@jenslody.de
--- Comment #11 from Jens Lody ---
Minor issues:
strange permission of source-file (640)
latest version is now 2015.10.08
decription:
"AbcMIDI is a set which contains [...]"
set of what ?
"[...]These programs were developed [...] and has been supported [...]"
Shouldn't it be: "[...] and have been supported (plural)"
The explicit Provides looks strange to me:
Provides: abcmidi = %{version}-%{release}
Provides: abcmidi%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
can the pakage be arch-dependent and arch-independent the same time ?
There are several warnings in the build-log, most likely harmless, but they
might lead to issues:
e.g.
parseabc.c:322:12: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size
[-Wpointer-to-int-cast]
parseabc.c:1062:1: warning: type of 'maxsize' defaults to 'int'
[-Wimplicit-int]
parseabc.c:1749:24: warning: format '%s' expects argument of type 'char *', but
argument 3 has type 'char **' [-Wformat=]
parseabc.c:1851:1: warning: implicit declaration of function 'appendfield'
[-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
parseabc.c:1316:6: warning: 'parsed' may be used uninitialized in this function
[-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
toabc.c:1491:8: warning: iteration 7u invokes undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
apart of this, everythings looks fine
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not use a name that already exists.
Note: A package with this name already exists. Please check
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/abcMIDI
See:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Conflicting_Package_Names
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 20 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/jens/1257410-abcMIDI/licensecheck.txt
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 501760 bytes in 7 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package
[Bug 1264485] Review Request: catch - A modern, C++-native, header-only, framework for unit-tests, TDD and BDD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264485 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- catch-1.2.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update catch' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-dc5e659fc8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1154218] Review Request: graphite-api - Graphite-web, without the interface. Just the rendering HTTP API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1154218 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- graphite-api-1.0.1-5.20150926git4cb65cd.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. If you want to test the update, you can install it with $ su -c 'dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update graphite-api' You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7979db562f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
