[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 Samuel Gyger changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(gy...@fsfe.org) | --- Comment #7 from Samuel Gyger --- If someone would look at the review afterwards, I would check it for actuality. But yes, I'm still interested to get electrum into Fedora. I also got a list mail that unbundeling is not longer necessary, if this is the case it's perhaps better to have the library directly in electrum? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276108] Review Request: nodejs-generate-function - Module that helps you write generated functions in Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276108] Review Request: nodejs-generate-function - Module that helps you write generated functions in Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-generate-function-2.0.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-910b46b511 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276108] Review Request: nodejs-generate-function - Module that helps you write generated functions in Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276108 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-generate-function-2.0.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-25e6cdf77a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276624] New: Review Request: swagger-core - Java implementation of Swagger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276624 Bug ID: 1276624 Summary: Review Request: swagger-core - Java implementation of Swagger Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/swagger-core.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/swagger-core-1.5.4-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: The goal of Swagger is to define a standard, language-agnostic interface to REST APIs which allows both humans and computers to discover and understand the capabilities of the service without access to source code, documentation, or through network traffic inspection. When properly defined via Swagger, a consumer can understand and interact with the remote service with a minimal amount of implementation logic. Similar to what interfaces have done for lower level programming, Swagger removes the guesswork in calling the service. Fedora Account System Username: gil Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11637565 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276624] Review Request: swagger-core - Java implementation of Swagger
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276624 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276625] New: Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276625 Bug ID: 1276625 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/geronimo-jcache.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/geronimo-jcache-1.0-0.1.alpha.1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Apache Geronimo implementation of the JSR-107 Fedora Account System Username: gil Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11638600 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276625] Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276625 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276629] New: Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276629 Bug ID: 1276629 Summary: Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jcs.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/apache-commons-jcs-2.0-0.1.beta.1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Apache Commons JCS is a distributed caching system written in Java. It is intended to speed up applications by providing a means to manage cached data of various dynamic natures. Like any caching system, JCS is most useful for high read, low put applications. Latency times drop sharply and bottlenecks move away from the database in an effectively cached system. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276629] Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276629 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276629] Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276629 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1276625 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276625 [Bug 1276625] Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276625] Review Request: geronimo-jcache - Apache Geronimo JCache Spec 1.0
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276625 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276629 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276629 [Bug 1276629] Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276632] New: Review Request: geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api - Apache Geronimo JCDI Spec 1.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276632 Bug ID: 1276632 Summary: Review Request: geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api - Apache Geronimo JCDI Spec 1.1 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm Description: Apache Geronimo implementation of the JSR-346 Context and Dependency Injection 1.1, 1.2 Specification Fedora Account System Username: gil Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11638674 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276632] Review Request: geronimo-jcdi-1.1-api - Apache Geronimo JCDI Spec 1.1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276632 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1215478] Review Request: lets-encrypt - A free, automated certificate authority
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1215478 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|nmavr...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273833] Review Request: libsoc - Interface with common SoC peripherals through generic kernel interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273833
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|anto.tra...@gmail.com |
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
- undefined-non-weak-symbol warnings are quieted by adding -fwhole-program flag
to CFLAGS variable. https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html
But I'm not sure that it's the right workaround.
- Tests are not execute (maybe they aren't still entirely provided).
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 16 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/1273833-libsoc/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[ ]: Package functions as describ
[Bug 1273833] Review Request: libsoc - Interface with common SoC peripherals through generic kernel interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273833 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198473] Review Request: python-configargparse - A Python module with support for argparse, config files, and env variables
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198473 --- Comment #3 from Fabian Affolter --- Thanks for comments. * Fri Oct 30 2015 Fabian Affolter - 0.9.3-2 - Update macros Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-configargparse.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/python-configargparse-0.9.3-2.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1198760] Review Request: mitmproxy - An interactive SSL-capable intercepting HTTP proxy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198760 Fabian Affolter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(mail@fabian-affol | |ter.ch) | --- Comment #10 from Fabian Affolter --- Still shipping the third-party stuff... %changelog * Fri Oct 30 2015 Fabian Affolter - 0.13-1 - Update macros - Update to latest upstream release 0.13 Updated files: Spec URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mitmproxy.spec SRPM URL: https://fab.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/mitmproxy-0.13-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1274645] Review Request: python-faker - Faker is a Python package that generates fake data for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274645 --- Comment #5 from Juan Orti --- I was able to build the documentation changing the PYTHONPATH variable, but the tests are failing. I have asked upstream for help in the issue 292: https://github.com/joke2k/faker/issues/292 Spec URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/python-faker/python-faker.spec SRPM URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/python-faker/python-faker-0.5.3-3.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1275057] Review Request: python-appstream - Parse AppStream files when you don't have libappstream-glib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057 --- Comment #10 from Ralph Bean --- Doh! Good catch. I do only plan to ship it for epel6. Upstream recommends that people not use this module when they can instead use appstream-glib (which is available in Fedora and RHEL7). This lib is just a tool to be used when that better lib is not available (like, on EL6 for instance). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1257178] Review Request: python-yaql - Yet Another Query Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1257178 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcos.fermin.l...@cern.ch Flags||needinfo?(marcos.fermin.lob ||o...@cern.ch) --- Comment #15 from Alan Pevec --- Package has been created in pkgdb https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-yaql/ but there are no builds yet http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=21190 ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1275057] Review Request: python-appstream - Parse AppStream files when you don't have libappstream-glib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- ralph's scratch build of python-appstream-0.8-1.fc22.src.rpm for el6-candidate completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11640811 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1275057] Review Request: python-appstream - Parse AppStream files when you don't have libappstream-glib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275057 --- Comment #12 from Ralph Bean --- OK, here's the latest: Spec URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SPECS/python-appstream.spec SRPM URL: http://threebean.org/rpm/SRPMS/python-appstream-0.8-1.fc22.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1274645] Review Request: python-faker - Faker is a Python package that generates fake data for you
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274645
--- Comment #6 from William Moreno ---
Good job building the doc, please note:
The man page must be in the same package of the executable under %{_bindir},
the idea is to have the manpage available to get info about a command without
the need of install aditional packages.
Move the docs/_build/html and docs/_build/text directoriies to the top of your
BuildRoot with mv.
pushd docs
PYTHONPATH='..' %make_build html
PYTHONPATH='..' %make_build text
PYTHONPATH='..' %make_build man
find . -type f -name '.buildinfo' -delete
mv _build/html ../
mv _build/text ../
popd
You are duplicanting files this files: README.rst CHANGELOG.rst
CONTRIBUTING.rst
You can leave the doc subpackage with just:
%files doc
%doc html text
The license file with be instaled with the python2 or python3 rpm so the doc
subpackage do not need to ship the license file.
With have weak depencies in Fedora, in booth python2 and python3 packages
include:
Enhances: %{name}-doc%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
Will be nice to run the test in the packaging process but I will no block this
review for that, just inclue the %%check section in the spec with a link to the
issue in github.
Remember than if you change the source from github to pypi you will need to
remove the blunded egg.info in prep.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269056] Review Request: php-pecl-mongodb - MongoDB driver for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269056 --- Comment #4 from Remi Collet --- Update to 1.0.0 (stable, GA) Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/aed0a46856b07868f0a29a0008db175a3b13ae27/php/pecl/php-pecl-mongodb/php-pecl-mongodb.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-mongodb-1.0.0-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270322] Review Request: chromium - A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322 --- Comment #13 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- Rather than try to wrangle with nacl for i686, I've simply disabled native_client support in chromium for that architecture, and added i686 to the ExclusiveArch list. New SRPM: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium-46.0.2490.80-5.fc23.src.rpm New SPEC: https://spot.fedorapeople.org/chromium.spec I'm doing builds of this for i686 and x86_64 in my copr (https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/spot/chromium/build/131554/). I would greatly appreciate some i686 testing, as I haven't had any ia32 hardware in a very long time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1234605] Review Request: statscache - A daemon to build and keep fedmsg statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234605 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- statscache-0.0.3-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2b54d43b77 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1234605] Review Request: statscache - A daemon to build and keep fedmsg statistics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1234605 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ade8e5763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1231444] Review Request: CPUFreqUtility - KDE CPU Frequence utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231444 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- CPUFreqUtility-1.4.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1ade8e5763 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644284 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188 --- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644400 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188 --- Comment #16 from Andy Lutomirski --- I'm reasonably confident that udev uses inotify to notice changes, so the scriptlet isn't needed. I switched to using _udevrulesdir, and I updated to a new upstream version with your install -d fix (and dropped the mkdir). I also hardened the build. Spec URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/u2f-hidraw-policy-3/u2f-hidraw-policy.spec SRPM URL: http://web.mit.edu/luto/www/fedora/u2f-hidraw-policy-3/u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644428 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1275487] Review Request: libu2f-host - Yubico Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) Host C Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275487 Andy Lutomirski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Andy Lutomirski --- LGTM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188 --- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- amluto's scratch build of u2f-hidraw-policy-1.0.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for f22 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11644428 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1275487] Review Request: libu2f-host - Yubico Universal 2nd Factor (U2F) Host C Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1275487 --- Comment #7 from Andy Lutomirski --- FWIW, it might be nice to the users of this package to depend on u2f-hidraw-policy once that shows up in the repo :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273188] Review Request: u2f-hidraw-policy - Udev rule to allow desktop access to HIDRAW U2F tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273188 Seth Jennings changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Seth Jennings --- Looks good! You are correct the udev autorefreshed on new rules. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276831] New: Review Request: tth - TeX to HTML/MathML translators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276831 Bug ID: 1276831 Summary: Review Request: tth - TeX to HTML/MathML translators Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/tth/tth.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/tth/tth-4.08-1.fc24.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: TTH translates TeX, the predominant mark-up language for expressing mathematics, into HTML, the language of world-wide-web browsers. It thereby enables mathematical documents to be made available on the web. Document structure, using either the Plain or LaTeX macro packages, isalso translated and incorporated in the form of hyperlinks. TTH is extremely fast and completely portable. It produces more compact, faster viewing, web documents than other converters, because it really translates the equations, instead of converting them to images. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
