[Bug 1274417] Enhancement request: need pl/v8 package for Postgresql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274417 Pavel Raiskup changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2015-11-11 03:04:31 --- Comment #3 from Pavel Raiskup --- Uh, sorry I haven't noticed earlier. This already have Review Request BZ. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1036130 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036130] Review request: plv8 - javascript language extension for postgresql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130 Pavel Raiskup changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fedora.jr...@grifent.com --- Comment #17 from Pavel Raiskup --- *** Bug 1274417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276880] Review Request: python-mne - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880 --- Comment #13 from Igor Gnatenko --- New SRPM: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-mne-0.10-4.fc24.src.rpm New SPEC: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-mne.spec Fixed non-executable. Docs I will think after pushing to repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788334 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f24 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788301 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for el6-candidate failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788377 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788384 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1036130] Review request: plv8 - javascript language extension for postgresql
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1036130 --- Comment #18 from Pavel Raiskup --- Mikko, I tried: $ fedora-review -b 1036130 -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 INFO: Processing bugzilla bug: 1036130 INFO: Getting .spec and .srpm Urls from : 1036130 INFO: --> SRPM url: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ehbxasatvkcqe3f/plv8-1.4.1-1.fc21.src.rpm INFO: --> Spec url: https://www.dropbox.com/s/9cezsd32j7ppj5q/plv8.spec INFO: Using review directory: /home/praiskup/rh/packages/plv8/review/1036130-plv8 INFO: Downloading .spec and .srpm files error: line 1: Unknown tag: http://ogp.me/ns/fb#"; xml:lang="en" class="media-desktop" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";>
[Bug 1273712] Review Request: google-noto-cjk-fonts - Google Noto Sans CJK Fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273712 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- google-noto-cjk-fonts-1.004-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-af6af4d9e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273712] Review Request: google-noto-cjk-fonts - Google Noto Sans CJK Fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273712 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- google-noto-cjk-fonts-1.004-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-af6af4d9e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for epel7-candidate completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11788875 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #14 from Dominique Martinet --- Hmm, I knew I was in the middle of something so this isn't what I wanted to push but this is weird, the same srpm does mock build on my laptop... Ohwell, will teach me to make sure I have a clean tree at least. Correct ones: http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika/libmooshika.spec http://asmadeus.notk.org/CEA/libmooshika/libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm This is purely personal but I don't like the official guideline for git snapshot version so I'm going back to release (I did upstream release 1.0 for these packages so it isn't a problem), I wouldn't mind adding the date but just the date isn't enough (hence my using git describe, which will give strictly ordered release numbers) Unrelated to the update, but regarding tests of this package, nfs-ganesha will not be packaged with RDMA enabled until we can bundle it separately (there's planned work for this upstream but not short-term), so I doubt this will get any momentum right now... But it's entierely possible to test the lib itself with the utils (-rcat and -rmitm subpackages) -- I doubt anyone has any use for rmitm, but rcat is meant to be similar to netcat in its purpose so it's easy enough to test if you have ibverbs-compatible equipment I'll also be at supercomputing next week if anyone feels like talking about this or anything else :) Thanks, Dominique -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268010] Review Request: libmooshika - helper library for RDMA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268010 --- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- martinetd's scratch build of libmooshika-1.0-1.fc22.src.rpm for f23 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11789146 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268450] Review Request: rubygem-sidekiq - Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268450 Pavel Valena changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pval...@redhat.com --- Comment #2 from Pavel Valena --- Informal Package Rewiew === Issues == * I would change license in spec file from 'LGPL-3.0' to 'LGPLv3' according to [1]. * Packed in the gem, in file [2], there are bundled static libraries, which are forbidden according to [3]. The js libraries are also minified, which is also forbidden according to [4]. I think it is better to use 'js-jquery' rpm package instead. * In a file [5] are two licences before a minified code. I is better to have a single file for every CSS library. * There are also unsatisfied install dependencies: Last metadata expiration check performed 0:00:00 ago on Wed Nov 11 12:43:52 2015. No matching package to install: 'rubygem(celluloid)' No matching package to install: 'rubygem(connection_pool)' Not all dependencies satisfied Error: Some packages could not be found. These packages are not available in fedora rawhide. Note that 'rubygem-celluloid' is also orphaned. I would not approve this package, because the package fails to install. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing [2] ./web/assets/javascripts/application.js [3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript#Static_Inclusion_of_Libraries [4] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:JavaScript#Compilation.2FMinification [5] ./web/assets/stylesheets/bootstrap.css [6] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239209 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1267328] Review Request: rubygem-connection_pool - Generic connection pool for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267328 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vondr...@redhat.com Blocks||1268450 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268450 [Bug 1268450] Review Request: rubygem-sidekiq - Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268450] Review Request: rubygem-sidekiq - Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268450 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1267328 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267328 [Bug 1267328] Review Request: rubygem-connection_pool - Generic connection pool for Ruby -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1268450] Review Request: rubygem-sidekiq - Simple, efficient background processing for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268450 --- Comment #3 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Pavel Valena from comment #2) >These packages are not available in fedora rawhide. Note that > 'rubygem-celluloid' is also orphaned. Just FYI, rubygem-celluloid was orphaned and later retired for good reasons: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2015-August/213660.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1278364] Review Request: python-whitenoise - Static file serving for Python web apps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278364 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1279310 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279310 [Bug 1279310] Please upgrade to upstream version -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 Jonathan Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jdie...@lesbg.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jdie...@lesbg.com --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Dieter --- Hey Tom, if you'd like I'll start working through reviewing the packages needed for Chromium. On the first glance through this one, I noticed that it puts the binaries in /usr/x86_64-nacl. Can we move it? Would there be a better place to put it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090499] Review Request: netresolve - Generic name resolution library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499 --- Comment #26 from Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) --- Spec URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//netresolve.spec SRPM URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//netresolve-0.0.1-0.7.2015git.fc24.src.rpm Description: Netresolve is a package for non-blocking network name resolution via backends intended as a replacement for name service switch based name resolution in glibc as well as a testbed for future glibc improvements. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090499] Review Request: netresolve - Generic name resolution library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499 --- Comment #27 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of netresolve-0.0.1-0.7.2015git.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11792116 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1107127] Review Request: procenv - Utility to show process environment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1107127 --- Comment #29 from Dave Love --- (In reply to James Hunt from comment #26) > I guess as I'm not a packager my name shouldn't appear in the changelog, so > Dave please feel free to change it as you wish. The guidelines say "Keep old changelog entries to credit the original authors." which seems good to me, but it's not clear to me if it needs one from me at the top in the event that it's OK as-is. > Now that the dust from the fc23 release has settled, is there anything else > that needs to be done before this package can be added to Fedora? I guess Orion will get round to it. I'd missed that he'd actually taken the review (thanks!). I didn't think I could try a swap previously without a working fedora-review. That tells me the built package is uninstallable, but I can't see why as it is installable in both RHEL 6 and Fedora rawhide. Current URLs, which should be explicit, but I haven't had a chance to look at the current version yet: Spec URL: https://jamesodhunt.fedorapeople.org/packages/procenv/procenv.spec SRPM URL: https://jamesodhunt.fedorapeople.org/packages/procenv/procenv-0.42-1.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090499] Review Request: netresolve - Generic name resolution library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499
--- Comment #28 from Jiri Popelka ---
Ok, all my objections seem to be resolved now.
But I have a new one ;-)
The dependencies doesn't look correct to me.
The main package require all subpackages and each subpackage requires main
package.
I guess you wanted to use
Requires: %{name}-core%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
instead of
Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1090499] Review Request: netresolve - Generic name resolution library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090499 Jiri Popelka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|tho...@redhat.com |jpope...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277970] Review Request: R-testthat - Unit Testing for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277970 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-testthat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277933] Review Request: R-praise - Praise Users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277933 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-praise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277966] Review Request: R-crayon - Colored Terminal Output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277966 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-crayon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277961] Review Request: R-memoise - Memoise functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277961 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-memoise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266805] Review Request: springframework-social - Connect your applications with SaaS providers such as Facebook and Twitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/springframework-social -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995444] Review Request: glassfish-websocket-api - JSR 356: Java API for WebSocket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/glassfish-websocket-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1258274] Review Request: glassfish-jaxrpc-api - The Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/glassfish-jaxrpc-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995435] Review Request: glassfish-transaction-api - Java JTA 1.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/glassfish-transaction-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995433] Review Request: glassfish-ejb-api - Java EJB 3.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/glassfish-ejb-api -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266806] Review Request: springframework-social-twitter - Spring Social Twitter API binding and connect support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266806 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/springframework-social-twitter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280343] New: Review Request: perl-Text-Bidi - Unicode bidirectional algorithm using libfribidi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280343 Bug ID: 1280343 Summary: Review Request: perl-Text-Bidi - Unicode bidirectional algorithm using libfribidi Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Bidi/perl-Text-Bidi.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Text-Bidi/perl-Text-Bidi-2.11-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: This Perl module provides basic support for the Unicode bidirectional (Bidi) text algorithm, for displaying text consisting of both left-to-right and right-to-left written languages (such as Hebrew and Arabic.) It does so via a SWIG interface file to the libfribidi library. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1221459] Review Request: hgsubversion - Mercurial extension for Subversion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459 --- Comment #24 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/hgsubversion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089553] Review request: python-SPARQLWrapper - SPARQL Endpoint interface to Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089553 Dan Scott changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(d...@coffeecode.ne | |t) | --- Comment #7 from Dan Scott --- Hi Ankur: I'm still interested, but realistically I'm lacking the time for the next few weeks to even look at this again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280343] Review Request: perl-Text-Bidi - Unicode bidirectional algorithm using libfribidi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280343 Petr Šabata changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||psab...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995438] Review Request: tyrus - JSR 356: Java API for WebSocket - Reference Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438
--- Comment #6 from marcindulak ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 914 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/gil/995438-tyrus/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[?]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Java:
[x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
[x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils
Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It
is pulled in by maven-local
[x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc
subpackage
[x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils
[x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink)
Maven:
[x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even
when building with ant
[x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping
[x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging
[x]: Old add_to_maven_depmap macro is not being used
[x]: Packages DO NOT have Requires(post) and Requires(postun) on jpackage-
utils for %update_maven_depmap macro
[x]: Package DOES NOT use %update_maven_depmap in %post/%postun
[x]: Packages use .mfiles file list instead of %{_datadir}/maven2/poms
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{na
[Bug 1266805] Review Request: springframework-social - Connect your applications with SaaS providers such as Facebook and Twitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995438] Review Request: tyrus - JSR 356: Java API for WebSocket - Reference Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438 --- Comment #7 from marcindulak --- Issues: 1. there is a "BSD (3 clause)" file in the package 2. licensing breakdown is not documented in the spec 3. I didn't not find any bundled libraries, optimally please contact fedora packaging in order to have this confirmed by someone with more java packaging experience than me 4. please explain shortly the reasons for pom_disable_module and pom_remove_plugin in the spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266805] Review Request: springframework-social - Connect your applications with SaaS providers such as Facebook and Twitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266805 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- springframework-social-1.0.3-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-f3f521a103 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266806] Review Request: springframework-social-twitter - Spring Social Twitter API binding and connect support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266806 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- springframework-social-twitter-1.0.5-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-272f1c6838 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266806] Review Request: springframework-social-twitter - Spring Social Twitter API binding and connect support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266806 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11794893 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172771] Review Request: ocaml-cmdliner - OCaml library for dealing with command line arguments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771 --- Comment #16 from Jon Ludlam --- Hi Andrew, any update on this review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11794982 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #2 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- The thing to remember about the nacl and nacl-arm packages is that they are cross-toolchains. The nacl-* packages are "x86_64-nacl" vs the Fedora default toolchain which is "x86_64-linux" (and nacl-arm-* is "arm-nacl") The pathing it uses is in sync with how Fedora handles cross-toolchains, see: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=6697860 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 Ralf Corsepius changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rc040...@freenet.de --- Comment #3 from Ralf Corsepius --- (In reply to Tom "spot" Callaway from comment #2) > The thing to remember about the nacl and nacl-arm packages is that they are > cross-toolchains. Exactly. This location is the default location the GNU-toolchain installs certain files into and expects to find them. Changing this location is non-trivial. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995433] Review Request: glassfish-ejb-api - Java EJB 3.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-11-11 11:17:40 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- I believe that this bug is fixed in glassfish-ejb-api-3.2-1.fc24, So I am closing this bug now. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11794983 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995444] Review Request: glassfish-websocket-api - JSR 356: Java API for WebSocket
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995444 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-11-11 11:18:47 --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo --- I believe that this bug is fixed in glassfish-websocket-api-1.1-1.fc24, So I am closing this bug now. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11794329 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995435] Review Request: glassfish-transaction-api - Java JTA 1.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-11-11 11:20:02 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo --- I believe that this bug is fixed in glassfish-transaction-api-1.2-1.fc24, So I am closing this bug now. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11794099 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995433] Review Request: glassfish-ejb-api - Java EJB 3.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 Bug 995433 depends on bug 995435, which changed state. Bug 995435 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-transaction-api - Java JTA 1.2 API Design Specification https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995435 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1258274] Review Request: glassfish-jaxrpc-api - The Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-11-11 11:21:41 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- I believe that this bug is fixed in glassfish-jaxrpc-api-1.1.1-1.fc24. So I am closing this bug now. Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11793916 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995433] Review Request: glassfish-ejb-api - Java EJB 3.2 API Design Specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995433 Bug 995433 depends on bug 1258274, which changed state. Bug 1258274 Summary: Review Request: glassfish-jaxrpc-api - The Java API for XML-Based RPC (JAX-RPC) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258274 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 995438] Review Request: tyrus - JSR 356: Java API for WebSocket - Reference Implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995438 --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to marcindulak from comment #7) > Issues: > > 1. there is a "BSD (3 clause)" file in the package Done > 2. licensing breakdown is not documented in the spec Done > 3. I didn't not find any bundled libraries, optimally please contact fedora > packaging in order to have this confirmed by someone with more java > packaging experience than me > 4. please explain shortly the reasons for pom_disable_module and > pom_remove_plugin in the spec Done Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/tyrus.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/tyrus-1.12-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11795270 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1156086] Review Request: openmx - Open source package for Material eXplorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- marcindulak's scratch build of openmx-3.7.10-1.el7.centos.src.rpm for el6-candidate failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11795210 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1156086] Review Request: openmx - Open source package for Material eXplorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- marcindulak's scratch build of openmx-3.7.10-1.el7.centos.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11795197 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279194] Review Request: RPG - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279194 Dominika Regéciová changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Last Closed||2015-11-11 12:07:35 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280422] New: Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280422 Bug ID: 1280422 Summary: Review Request: rpg - RPM Package Generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsil...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jsilhan.fedorapeople.org/rpg.spec SRPM URL: https://jsilhan.fedorapeople.org/rpg-0.0.4-1.git.20.4b321ab.fc22.src.rpm Description: RPG [1] is tool, that guides people through the creation of a RPM package. RPG makes packaging much easier due to the automatic analysis of packaged files. Beginners can get familiar with packaging process or the advanced users can use our tool for a quick creation of a package. Fedora Account System Username: jsilhan I am one of the upstream developers. I don't need a sponsor - I am already in a package group. The package is build fine in COPR repository [2]. [1] https://github.com/rh-lab-q/rpg [2] https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/nightly/rpg/builds/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1089553] Review request: python-SPARQLWrapper - SPARQL Endpoint interface to Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1089553 --- Comment #8 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- No worries, Dan, take your time. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273927] Review Request: qtcurve - A set of widget styles for GTK+ and Qt widget toolkits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273927 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-11-11 12:45:48 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- in f22/f23 stable updates now, thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279197] Review Request: breeze-icon-theme - Breeze icon theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279197 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2015-11-11 12:50:40 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- imported (not built yet, waiting for plasma-5.5?) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277956] Review Request: R-digest - Create Cryptographic Hash Digest of R Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277956 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from gil cattaneo --- Remain a doubt about bundled libraries. Please, fix before import. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #16 from Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) --- Spec URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//dhcpcd.spec SRPM URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//dhcpcd-6.9.3-3.fc24.src.rpm Description: The dhcpcd package provides a minimalistic network configuration daemon that supports IPv4 and IPv6 configuration including configuration discovery through NDP, DHCPv4 and DHCPv6 protocols. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277956] Review Request: R-digest - Create Cryptographic Hash Digest of R Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277956 --- Comment #9 from Tom "spot" Callaway --- I didn't, because the zlib files are just the headers (no library code) and I do not believe it is all of smhasher, just part of it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #17 from Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) --- The above (In reply to Pavel Šimerda (pavlix) from comment #16) > Spec URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//dhcpcd.spec > SRPM URL: http://pavlix.fedorapeople.org//dhcpcd-6.9.3-3.fc24.src.rpm Not yet final, please wait for another respin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #18 from Michael Schwendt --- > Not yet final, please wait for another respin. Better pay attention to the bottom of comment 12 because your package contains several very unusual things that are severe mistakes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264985] Review Request: nodejs-es6-promise - Lightweight library that provides tools for organizing asynchronous code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264985 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-es6-promise-3.0.2-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1156086] Review Request: openmx - Open source package for Material eXplorer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1156086 --- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo --- can you upload the new spec file and src rpm? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2015-09-14 19:19:25 |2015-11-11 13:23:16 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1045963] Review Request: ghc-gtk3 - Binding to the Gtk+ graphical user interface library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045963 --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-gtk3-0.12.5.2-1.1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #19 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11796361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #20 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11796370 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1265628] Review Request: dhcpcd - A minimalistic network configuration daemon with DHCP and rdisc support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1265628 --- Comment #21 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- pavlix's scratch build of dhcpcd-6.9.3-3.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11796403 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277271] Review Request: rubygem-algorithms - Useful algorithms and data structures for Ruby
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277271 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rubygem-algorithms -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277956] Review Request: R-digest - Create Cryptographic Hash Digest of R Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277956 --- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/R-digest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280464] New: Review Request: python-citeproc-py - Yet another Python CSL Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280464 Bug ID: 1280464 Summary: Review Request: python-citeproc-py - Yet another Python CSL Processor Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-citeproc-py.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-citeproc-py-0.3.0-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Yet another Python CSL Processor. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280464] Review Request: python-citeproc-py - Yet another Python CSL Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280464 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Alias||python-citeproc-py Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098164] Review Request: nodejs-sorted-object - Returns a copy of an object with its keys sorted
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098164 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fir...@gmail.com, ||piotr1...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(fir...@gmail.com) --- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch --- This package is approved seems not built. Ian, are you still interested in maintaining this package? If so please respond in this bug. With no response within two weeks I will mark this request as dead and close this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Dieter --- Thanks, that's what I wanted to check on. I'm just heading to bed, but I'll do a more thorough review in the morning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115702] Review Request: nodejs-postcss - Framework for CSS postprocessors with full source map support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115702 --- Comment #10 from Piotr Popieluch --- The new version depends on babel which is not packaged yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189375] Review Request:nodejs-btoa - conversion from base64-encoded to ascii
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189375 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added CC||piotr1...@gmail.com Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1272764] Review Request: nodejs-path-exists -Check if a path exists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272764 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280480] New: Review Request: python-duecredir - Automated collection and reporting of citations for used software/methods/datasets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280480 Bug ID: 1280480 Summary: Review Request: python-duecredir - Automated collection and reporting of citations for used software/methods/datasets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-duecredit.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-duecredit-0.4.4.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: duecredit is being conceived to address the problem of inadequate citation of scientific software and methods, and limited visibility of donation requests for open-source software. It provides a simple framework (at the moment for Python only) to embed publication or other references in the original code so they are automatically collected and reported to the user at the necessary level of reference detail, i.e. only references for actually used functionality will be presented back if software provides multiple citeable implementations. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280480] Review Request: python-duecredit - Automated collection and reporting of citations for used software/methods/datasets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280480 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Depends On||1280464 ||(python-citeproc-py) Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-duecredir - |python-duecredit - |Automated collection and|Automated collection and |reporting of citations for |reporting of citations for |used|used |software/methods/datasets |software/methods/datasets Alias||python-duecredit Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280464 [Bug 1280464] Review Request: python-citeproc-py - Yet another Python CSL Processor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280464] Review Request: python-citeproc-py - Yet another Python CSL Processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280464 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1280480 (python-duecredit) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280480 [Bug 1280480] Review Request: python-duecredit - Automated collection and reporting of citations for used software/methods/datasets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276629] Review Request: apache-commons-jcs - Apache Commons Java Caching System
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276629 Ludovic Hirlimann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ludo...@hirlimann.net Blocks||1236705 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1236705 [Bug 1236705] Update josm to 8677 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276880] Review Request: python-mne - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880 --- Comment #14 from Julien Enselme --- I still get the non-executable errors. It is strange since I think your code to correct it is correct. Sadly, I don't have much time to dig into it today. Maybe tomorrow. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280482] New: Review Request: python-PyLink - Universal communication interface using File-Like API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280482 Bug ID: 1280482 Summary: Review Request: python-PyLink - Universal communication interface using File-Like API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-PyLink.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-PyLink-0.3.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Pylink offers a universal communication interface using File-Like API. For now, only the TCP, UDP, Serial and GSM interfaces are supported. The aim of this project is to allow any type of communication. It is best suited for projects that have various ways of communicating including IP remote or local serial communication. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280482] Review Request: python-PyLink - Universal communication interface using File-Like API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280482 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Alias||python-PyLink Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280485] New: Review Request: python-PyMVPA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280485 Bug ID: 1280485 Summary: Review Request: python-PyMVPA Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-PyMVPA.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/neurofedora/python-PyMVPA-2.4.0-3.fc24.src.rpm Description: PyMVPA is a Python package intended to ease statistical learning analyses of large datasets. It offers an extensible framework with a high-level interface to a broad range of algorithms for classification, regression, feature selection, data import and export. It is designed to integrate well with related software packages, such as scikit-learn, shogun, MDP, etc. While it is not limited to the neuroimaging domain, it is eminently suited for such datasets. PyMVPA is free software and requires nothing but free-software to run. PyMVPA stands for MultiVariate Pattern Analysis (MVPA) in Python. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280485] Review Request: python-PyMVPA - Multivariate pattern analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280485 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: |python-PyMVPA |python-PyMVPA - ||Multivariate pattern ||analysis -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276871] Review Request: python-nibabel - Python package to access a cacophony of neuro-imaging file formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1280485 (python-PyMVPA) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280485 [Bug 1280485] Review Request: python-PyMVPA - Multivariate pattern analysis -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1280485] Review Request: python-PyMVPA - Multivariate pattern analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280485 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1276941 (fedora-neuro) Depends On||1276871 (python-nibabel), ||1278685 (python-pywt) Alias||python-PyMVPA Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276871 [Bug 1276871] Review Request: python-nibabel - Python package to access a cacophony of neuro-imaging file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276941 [Bug 1276941] Fedora NeuroImaging and NeuroScience tracking bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278685 [Bug 1278685] Review Request: python-pywt - PyWavelets, wavelet transform module -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1278685] Review Request: python-pywt - PyWavelets, wavelet transform module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278685 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1280485 (python-PyMVPA) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280485 [Bug 1280485] Review Request: python-PyMVPA - Multivariate pattern analysis -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276880] Review Request: python-mne - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880 --- Comment #15 from Igor Gnatenko --- For which scripts? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1189375] Review Request:nodejs-btoa - conversion from base64-encoded to ascii
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189375 --- Comment #4 from Piotr Popieluch --- some issues: - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. Note: License file LICENSE is marked as %doc instead of %license See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text - nodejs-btoa.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib nodejs-btoa.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/node_modules/nodejs-btoa/bin/btoa.js 644 /usr/bin/env - Please use github source guidelines for source0 or use npm. - any particular reason for disabling the tests? All tests succeed here -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1276880] Review Request: python-mne - Magnetoencephalography (MEG) and Electroencephalography (EEG) data analysis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1276880 --- Comment #16 from Julien Enselme --- All of them: Rpmlint (from fedora review) --- Checking: python2-mne-0.10-4.fc24.noarch.rpm python3-mne-0.10-4.fc24.noarch.rpm python-mne-0.10-4.fc24.src.rpm python2-mne.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python-matplotlib python2-mne.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Magnetoencephalography -> Electroencephalography, Electroencephalograph, Electroencephalogram python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_freeview_bem_surfaces.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_compare_fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_watershed_bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_make_scalp_surfaces.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_maxfilter.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_bti2fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_compute_proj_eog.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_coreg.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_flash_bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_report.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_browse_raw.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_flash_bem_model.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/stats/cluster_level.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_clean_eog_ecg.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_compute_proj_ecg.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_kit2fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_surf2bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python2-mne.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mne-2.7 python2-mne.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary mne-2 python2-mne.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary python2-mne python3-mne.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency python3-matplotlib python3-mne.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Magnetoencephalography -> Electroencephalography, Electroencephalograph, Electroencephalogram python3-mne.noarch: W: invalid-url URL: http://martinos.org/mne/ timed out python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_make_scalp_surfaces.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_flash_bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_kit2fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_bti2fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_report.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_clean_eog_ecg.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_compare_fiff.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_watershed_bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_maxfilter.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_browse_raw.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/stats/cluster_level.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_compute_proj_ecg.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_flash_bem_model.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_surf2bem.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3-mne.noarch: E: non-executable-script /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/mne/commands/mne_freeview_be
