[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-76ec8bbf6b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-76ec8bbf6b --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4f6a9e4c87 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-39ed4006b8 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-90322d5a7f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-39ed4006b8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7d57400641 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7d57400641 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c9487192e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c9487192e2 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-87ab6ca223 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 Bug 1285941 depends on bug 1294537, which changed state. Bug 1294537 Summary: python-docutils-0.12-0.5.20140510svn7747.fc24.noarch requires python-imaging retired in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294537 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1229886] Review Request: pynote - Manage notes on the commandline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229886 Bug 1229886 depends on bug 1294537, which changed state. Bug 1294537 Summary: python-docutils-0.12-0.5.20140510svn7747.fc24.noarch requires python-imaging retired in rawhide https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294537 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 --- Comment #20 from Jonathan Dieter --- Created attachment 1110130 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1110130&action=edit Manually set ld scriptdir Ok, I've done some digging and this should fix it. The problem is that $scriptdir depends on $tooldir which we manually set when we run %make. This patch manually sets $scriptdir to the correct location. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270355] Review Request: nacl-binutils - A GNU collection of binary utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270355 Jonathan Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #21 from Jonathan Dieter --- As this patch fixes the final problem I listed, this review is APPROVED contingent on either the application of this patch or another fix for comment #17. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279085] Review Request: maxmind-geoip2 - GeoIP2 webservice and database API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279085 --- Comment #4 from Matthias Mailänder --- An update to 2.5.0 is also not likely to succeed. https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/10280 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292426] Review Request: nodejs-event-emitter - Environment agnostic event emitter
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292426 --- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch --- Jared, Could you please create bodhi updates for all branches? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-548727c47f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.fc23 php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-548727c47f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.fc22 php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.fc22 php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.fc22 php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2e659d43aa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199693] Review Request: pcp-pmda-cpp - C++ library for PCP PMDAs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199693 --- Comment #26 from Michael Schwendt --- Running into this ticket again while cleaning up my filtered mail folders, I have no idea what's been going on in here. By setting the fedora-review flag to '+', you've removed the ticket from the visible part of the needsponsor list at: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ Due to that, it's very difficult to find this ticket. Only very few people browse the "Tickets under review" list and watch out for stalled reviews. > Nathan Scott 2015-06-03 19:06:27 EDT > > Marking reviewed (by myself and Michael Schwendt) - no further follow ups > received and all earlier recommendations incorporated. > Flags: fedora-review+ This is unusual activity. Normally, you would assign the ticket to yourself and set the fedora-review flag to '?' to show that you accept the role of the reviewer: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process Only when done with the official review, you would set the flag to '+'. Further, until recently, you would have needed to be a member of the packagersponsors group to be able to review and approve this package. The recent change to the process is that everyone in packager group may review and approve packages from new contributors. Yet they still need to follow the How To Get Sponsored document. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294666] New: Review Request: python-sql - Python library to write SQL queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294666 Bug ID: 1294666 Summary: Review Request: python-sql - Python library to write SQL queries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: d...@danny.cz QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/python-sql.spec SRPM URL: http://fedora.danny.cz/python-sql-0.8-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: python-sql is a library to write SQL queries in a pythonic way. Fedora Account System Username: sharkcz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294666] Review Request: python-sql - Python library to write SQL queries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294666 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- sharkcz's scratch build of python-sql-0.8-1.fc24.src.rpm for f24 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12343274 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1078588] Review Request: ts - Task Spooler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1078588 --- Comment #9 from Michael Schwendt --- Running into this ticket again while cleaning up my filtered mail folders: 0.7.5 has been released on 2015-03-06. autosetup: option requires an argument -- 'n' error: Unknown option n in autosetup(a:b:cDn:TvNS:p:) + make -j3 cc -pedantic -ansi -Wall -g -O0 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__STRICT_ANSI__ -c main.c cc -pedantic -ansi -Wall -g -O0 -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -D__STRICT_ANSI__ -c server.c Global compilation flags are not applied yet: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Compiler_flags > %clean An empty %clean section would override the default and not remove the buildroot. Check end of rpmbuild output. > /usr/share/ts-0.7.4/COPYING A %license macro has been introduced in January 2015. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281801] Review Request: tinycompress - A library for compress audio offload in alsa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281801
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(anto.trande@gmail |
|.com) |
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #2)
> Sorry, not sure from the above what I need to do close this review out
> Library is not 'Full RELRO' if packaged in F22
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages#Summary.
> #%{_libdir}/pkgconfig/tinycompress.pc
Is there a pkgconfig-file ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1289760] Review Request: drawtk - A C library to perform efficient 3D drawings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289760 --- Comment #4 from Dmitry Mikhirev --- There is a public repository on github: https://github.com/nbourdau/drawtk I archived sources from alioth repo because it contains exactly the same files that were in the latest released tarball that seems lost. This library is needed only for possible future development. >[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Thank you, I will fix this. >[!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. >[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. What is wrong here? >[!]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. It is not a GUI application. >[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > add gcc Require gcc? Why? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293100] Review Request: tarantool - an in-memory database and Lua application server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293100 --- Comment #1 from Roman Tsisyk --- Any news? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1018546] Review Request: musepack-libmpc - Living audio compression
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018546 --- Comment #7 from Michael Schwendt --- > All dependent packages will need to be rebuilt since this version > changes the version of the provided shared object: > libmpcdec.so.6()(64bit). The older was libmpcdec.so.5()(64bit) Are they API compatible? If they are not compatible, the typical solution is to create packages that don't conflict with eachother. [...] $ rpmls -p musepack-libmpc-1.3.0-0.1.svn484.fc23.x86_64.rpm -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mpc2sv8 -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mpccut -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mpcenc -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/mpcgain -rwxr-xr-x /usr/bin/wavcmp I find the naming and subpackage split somewhat unfortunate. The musepack-libmpc package does not contain a "libmpc". There hasn't been one before. libmpc is a common prefix for the project libs with MPC being an abbreviation of Musepack. In SVN, libmpc is sort of an umbrella, with the sub-projects stored in various subdirs. There are only a couple of static libs built into the various tools. There is no shared libmpcenc, for example. The old encoder was called "mppenc" as a tool without a lib, too. The musepack-libmpc package contains only tools. The musepack-libmpc-devel package doesn't contain any lib either, just unversioned base headers. How much can you do with these headers only? libmpcdec-devel needs them, but hey, everything is built from a single src.rpm, so why create separate subpackages already? Would anything want only musepack-libmpc-devel? And libmpcdec-devel cannot be used standalone, as it needs headers from musepack-libmpc-devel. Finally, libmpcdec contains not only the single shared lib but also the "mpcdec" command-line tool. It's at 1.0.0, however, not 1.3.0. That's because the official release date is not reflected in the built rpms except for the "r475" in %release. Upstream tells: | musepack_src_r475.tar.gz | | Musepack SV8 libs & tools (r475) | | Stable release of Musepack SV8 libraries and tools | |License: BSD/GNU LGPL |Release date: 2011.08.10 I don't know how important the r475 revision is for upstream when doing future releases. SVN trunk is at r485, but the internal version of libmpcdec is unchanged. It's at 1.3.0 since 2009. The same rpm also builds the tools, each with an own version. E.g. mpcenc is at 1.30.1, mpcdec at 1.0.0. It would be difficult to specify a strict dependency on "libmpcdec > r484", for example, because one cannot ignore everything at the left side of Fedora's %release value for that package. Giving the tools package the internal version of libmpcdec is strange. Note that a strict subpackage split could set an own %version for each subpackage, if needed. Will the "Stream Version" ever change again? It's at SV8 for several years. As a suggestion, I would name the Source RPM "musepack-sv8" (or simply "musepack") and build subpackages in the same namespace: musepack-sv8-libs<-- there's just one lib so far, however musepack-sv8-tools <-- there's half a dozen tools musepack-sv8-devel Easier to find for users searching for musepack. Currently, if you search for "musepack", you would get musepack-libmpc not giving any hint that it contains tools, and additionally, it pulls in libmpcdec as it doesn't work without that lib. If there ever will be more shared libs to put into individual subpackages, that could still be done if necessary. > musepack-libmpc-1.3.0-0.1.svn484.fc22.src.rpm About the versioning here, it doesn't follow the guidelines. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages As libmpc has been at 1.3.0 in 2009 already, this checkout cannot be a pre-release of 1.3.0. No "0." prefix in %release. It would either need to be a post-release snapshot, or a pre-release of whatever version would be released next, e.g. 1.3.1 or 1.4.0. Then the guidelines want the checkout date be inserted: 1.3.0-1.20140717svn484.fc22 If the upstream release versioning scheme is unknown, %version could be set to '0', which gives you much more freedom to squeeze details into %release. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1194781] Review Request: pcre2 - Perl-compatible regular expression library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1194781 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||or...@cora.nwra.com --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski --- Petr - any interest in building this for EPEL? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jcline's scratch build of python-flower-0.8.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12344430 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1278963] Review Request: distro-info-data - Information about releases of Debian and Ubuntu (data files)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278963 --- Comment #3 from Michael Kuhn --- Thanks for your review! > - license text not in %files as %license, please add: > %license debian/copyright > to %files Done. > - Does not own all directories that it creates, in specfiles pkg-specific > directories must be part of %files, so that they get removed when the pkg > gets removed, to do this simply change: Done. I did it like this because distro-info already owns this directory. Is it a problem that both packages do so now? > If you can create a 0.28-2 srpm fixing these 2 issues, then we should be > good to go wrt this pkg. > > Note as said please do a -2 and add a %changelog entry for the changes. > During Fedora pkg-review we always bump the Release field and add a > changelog entry when doing a new version, rather then keeping the release at > 1 during the entire review process. So when you did the new dput-ng pkg > which adds distro-data as dependency you should have made that > dput-ng-1.10-2, no need to fix this now, but please always bump Release when > doing new versions during pkg-review from now on. Sorry about that. I was somehow under the impression that the Release should be kept at 1. :-) I have uploaded new versions here: Spec: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/distro-info-data/distro-info-data.spec SRPM: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/distro-info-data/distro-info-data-0.28-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1278964] Review Request: distro-info - Provides information about releases of Debian and Ubuntu
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278964
--- Comment #4 from Michael Kuhn ---
> - Please add a comment (# foo) above: "%make_install VENDOR=ubuntu" why you
> use VENDOR=ubuntu
> here
I have solved this differently now. This was needed because the Makefile
installs a symlink to $VENDOR-distro-info and there is no fedora-distro-info. I
have now disabled the installation of this symlink.
> - license text not in %files as %license, please add:
> %license debian/copyright
> to %files for all (sub)packages. Note normally you would only add a %license
> line to %files for the main pkg, but since the different sub-pkgs do not
> interdepend here (and there is no main pkg), you need to add it to all
> sub-pkgs.
Done.
> - Does not own all directories that it creates: Does not own the
> %{perl_vendorlib}/Debian dir
Done.
> If you can create a -2 srpm fixing these 3 issues, then we should be good to
> go wrt this pkg.
Spec: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/distro-info/distro-info.spec
SRPM: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/distro-info/distro-info-0.14-2.fc23.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] New: Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Bug ID: 1294704 Summary: Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools-19.1.1-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Setuptools is a collection of enhancements to the Python distutils that allow you to more easily build and distribute Python packages, especially ones that have dependencies on other packages. This package also contains the runtime components of setuptools, necessary to execute the software that requires pkg_resources.py. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288927] Review Request: libsylph - E-Mail client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288927 Michael Schwendt changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #3 from Michael Schwendt --- Guys, please pay attention to the Review Process description. It's not so difficult. The fedora-review tags is not to be touched by anyone else than the reviewer assigned to the ticket. Messing with the fedora-review flag or other ticket details can lead to hiding the ticket in ways it becomes very difficult to find when using the review tracker: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1263821] Review Request: dput-ng - Next generation Debian package upload tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1263821 --- Comment #4 from Michael Kuhn --- > - rpmlint checks return: > dput-ng.noarch: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag > /etc/dput.d/profiles/security-master.json > … > I'm fine with keeping this as is, adding the (noreplace), or moving the > files enitrely to /usr/share (if user modification is not expected / not > desirable). Your call. Good point, I simply used this layout because that is how the Debian package does it. I have now checked the documentation again and dput-ng first checks /usr/share, then /etc and then ~. I have now moved all files to /usr/share as they can be easily overridden using appropriate files in /etc or ~ (but this is usually not necessary). > - license text not marked as %license, the LICENSE file should be a seperate > line in %files starting with %license, rather then being part of %doc Done. By the way, I guess the Fedora wiki page (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_create_an_RPM_package) is out-of-date then because it still contains the following sentence: “These prefixes are not valid in Fedora: %license and %readme.” Should I just update this? > If you can create a 2 srpm fixing these 2 issues (note as said for the first > issue, not taking any action is an acceptable solution), then we should be > good to go wrt this pkg. Spec: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/dput-ng/dput-ng.spec SRPM: https://ikkoku.de/~suraia/dput-ng/dput-ng-1.10-2.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Ville Skyttä changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ville.sky...@iki.fi --- Comment #1 from Ville Skyttä --- URLs return 404 Not Found, and setuptools 19.2 is available... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski --- oops, fixed. 19.2 isn't even in Fedora rawhide, but sure... Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools-19.2-1.el7.src.rpm * Tue Dec 29 2015 Orion Poplawski - 19.2-1 - Update to 19.2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222334] Review Request: bup - Efficient backup system based on git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System --- bup-0.27-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222334] Review Request: bup - Efficient backup system based on git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-12-29 17:24:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Scratch build - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12345583 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] New: Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 Bug ID: 1294711 Summary: Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-py.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-py-1.4.30-1.el7.src.rpm Description: The py lib is a Python development support library featuring the following tools and modules: * py.path: uniform local and svn path objects * py.apipkg: explicit API control and lazy-importing * py.iniconfig: easy parsing of .ini files * py.code: dynamic code generation and introspection * py.path: uniform local and svn path objects Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294711 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 [Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294713 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294713 [Bug 1294713] Build for python3 in EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294714] Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294714 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294714] New: Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294714 Bug ID: 1294714 Summary: Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-chardet.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-chardet-2.3.0-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Character encoding auto-detection in Python. As smart as your browser. Open source. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294714 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294714 [Bug 1294714] Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 --- Comment #15 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jcline's scratch build of python-flower-0.8.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12346105 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294717 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294717 [Bug 1294717] Review Request: python3-PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294717] Review Request: python3-PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294717 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294717] New: Review Request: python3-PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294717 Bug ID: 1294717 Summary: Review Request: python3-PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-PyYAML.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-PyYAML-3.11-1.el7.src.rpm Description: YAML is a data serialization format designed for human readability and interaction with scripting languages. PyYAML is a YAML parser and emitter for Python. PyYAML features a complete YAML 1.1 parser, Unicode support, pickle support, capable extension API, and sensible error messages. PyYAML supports standard YAML tags and provides Python-specific tags that allow to represent an arbitrary Python object. PyYAML is applicable for a broad range of tasks from complex configuration files to object serialization and persistance. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 --- Comment #16 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jcline's scratch build of python-flower-0.8.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12346135 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 --- Comment #17 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jcline's scratch build of python-flower-0.8.3-2.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12346273 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 --- Comment #18 from Jeremy Cline --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jeremycline/python-flower-packaging/master/python-flower.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/jeremycline/python-flower-packaging/raw/master/python-flower-0.8.3-3.fc23.src.rpm Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12346521 Updated build dependencies so the tests don't try to pip install anything. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294730] New: Review Request: erlang-p1_pgsql - Pure Erlang PostgreSQL driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294730
Bug ID: 1294730
Summary: Review Request: erlang-p1_pgsql - Pure Erlang
PostgreSQL driver
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-p1_pgsql.spec
SRPM URL:
https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-p1_pgsql-0-1.20150428gite72c03c6.fc24.src.rpm
Description: This is an Erlang PostgreSQL driver, used by ejabberd.
Fedora Account System Username: rbarlow
Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12347561
There are three warnings from rpmlint:
Checking: erlang-p1_pgsql-0-1.20150428gite72c03c6.fc24.noarch.rpm
erlang-p1_pgsql-0-1.20150428gite72c03c6.fc24.src.rpm
erlang-p1_pgsql.noarch: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
erlang-p1_pgsql.noarch: W: no-documentation
erlang-p1_pgsql.src:43: W: libdir-macro-in-noarch-package (main package)
%{_libdir}/erlang/lib/%{srcname}-%{version}
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 3 warnings.
I believe we can ignore these warnings. It is Erlang packaging convention to
include all Erlang pacakges in %{_libdir}/erlang, and not all Erlang packages
have binaries (like this one):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Peter/Erlang_Packaging_Guidelines#Debug_symbols_.2F_source_installation_.2F_dialyzer
Additionally, the upstream git repository does not contain any documentation
for this package.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294730] Review Request: erlang-p1_pgsql - Pure Erlang PostgreSQL driver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294730 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1204119 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1204119 [Bug 1204119] ejabberd-15.11 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1291539] Review Request: nodejs-has-unicode - Try to guess if your terminal supports unicode
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291539 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-has-unicode-2.0.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b20330f2c9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293204] Review Request: nodejs-is-arrayish - Check if an object can be used like an Array
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293204 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-is-arrayish-0.2.1-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-80d26f48b2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293204] Review Request: nodejs-is-arrayish - Check if an object can be used like an Array
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293204 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266939] Review Request: kf5-purpose - Framework for providing abstractions to get the developer's purposes fulfilled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266939 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@tiscali.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattia.ve...@tiscali.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1289738] Review Request: plasma-user-manager - Manage the users of your system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mattia.ve...@tiscali.it Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mattia.ve...@tiscali.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
