[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.fc23, php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.fc23, php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.fc23, php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-548727c47f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294341] Review Request: nodejs-dreamopt - Command-line parser with readable syntax from your sweetest dreams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294341 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-dreamopt-0.8.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-1a0d4ad0d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7d57400641 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277470] Review Request: php-nette-application - Nette Application MVC Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277470 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-application-2.3.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-0653618d90 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-76ec8bbf6b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294872] New: Review Request: python-backports_abc - A backport of recent additions to the 'collections.abc' module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294872 Bug ID: 1294872 Summary: Review Request: python-backports_abc - A backport of recent additions to the 'collections.abc' module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-backports_abc.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-backports_abc-0.4-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: A backport of recent additions to the 'collections.abc' module. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294872] Review Request: python-backports_abc - A backport of recent additions to the 'collections.abc' module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294872 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1272810 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272810 [Bug 1272810] python-tornado-4.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1229886] Review Request: pynote - Manage notes on the commandline
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229886 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- williamjmorenor's scratch build of pynote-1.0.0-2.fc24.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12349967 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #7 from Ville Skyttä ---
(In reply to Orion Poplawski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #4)
> > Summary and %description should say "Python 3" because this is Python 3
> > only.
> >
> > Summary and %description for the binary package should probably say "Python
> > %{python3_version}" instead of "Python 3".
>
> The name of the package "python3X-setuptools" will be displayed next to
> summaries and description
Really, everywhere?
> and I think makes this point.
By that argument you could leave the words python and setuptools out of the
summary and description as well. It wouldn't be a good idea to do that either,
just like it is not a good idea to knowingly leave inaccurate and possibly
misleading versioning information there that would be very easy to fix. I won't
block the review because of this, but I suggest you reconsider.
> > Rest of the docs would be better installed as "%doc docs/*" to avoid one
> > unnecessary dir.
>
> Fixed.
Makefile and conf.py in docs don't seem useful, I suggest removing them before
the first build.
Accepted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294078] Review Request: nodejs-json-diff - JSON diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294078 Piotr Popieluch changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1092945 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1092945 [Bug 1092945] nodejs-esprima-2.7.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1289738] Review Request: plasma-user-manager - Manage the users of your system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289738
Mattia Verga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Flags||needinfo?(rdie...@math.unl.
||edu)
--- Comment #3 from Mattia Verga ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- License in .spec file is GPLv2+ but some sources are licensed
as GPLv2, some others are LGPL (v2 or later).
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v2.0)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)",
"Unknown or generated". 54 files have unknown license. Detailed output
of licensecheck in /home/rpmbuild/1289738-plasma-user-
manager/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[-]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]:
[Bug 1293053] Review Request: nodejs-next - Functions that extend and complement Node.js API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293053 --- Comment #3 from Piotr Popieluch --- thank you, removed executable bits. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293053] Review Request: nodejs-next - Functions that extend and complement Node.js API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293053 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes --- Great. Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #8 from Orion Poplawski --- Okay, I've added the version to summary/description and cleaned up the docs. Thanks for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1239008] Review Request: bumpversion - Version-bump your software with a single command
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1239008 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- bumpversion-0.5.3-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-61a8e1487c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270368] Review Request: nacl-arm-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl (ARM)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270368 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-arm-gcc-4.9.2-7.git336bd0b.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-7e52f1b75f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski --- Yeah, I don't care about either of those. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294904] New: Review Request: python-macros - The unversioned Python RPM macros
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294904 Bug ID: 1294904 Summary: Review Request: python-macros - The unversioned Python RPM macros Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-macros.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python-macros-3-1.el7.src.rpm Description: This package contains the unversioned Python RPM macros, that most implementations should rely on. You should not need to install this package manually as the various python?-devel packages require it. So install a python-devel package instead. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #7 from Orion Poplawski --- Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytest-2.8.5-2.el7.src.rpm * Wed Dec 30 2015 Orion Poplawski - 2.8.5-2 - Use github tarball for source -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1290393 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393 [Bug 1290393] python34-msgpack: please provide python3 build in epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1290393 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290393 [Bug 1290393] python34-msgpack: please provide python3 build in epel7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266939] Review Request: kf5-purpose - Framework for providing abstractions to get the developer's purposes fulfilled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266939 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/kf5-purpose -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294078] Review Request: nodejs-json-diff - JSON diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294078 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-json-diff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293053] Review Request: nodejs-next - Functions that extend and complement Node.js API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293053 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-next -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python3-setuptools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1291007] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc - include a full table of contents in your Sphinx HTML sidebar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc-1.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1291007] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc - include a full table of contents in your Sphinx HTML sidebar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-12-30 19:56:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941 Bug 1285941 depends on bug 1291007, which changed state. Bug 1291007 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc - include a full table of contents in your Sphinx HTML sidebar https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291007 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #8 from John Dulaney --- Oh, I was merely posting for info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 John Dulaney changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jdula...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python3-setuptools-19.2-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c515c5de8e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 --- Comment #2 from John Dulaney --- rpmlint looks good: jdulaney@gefjon:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint ./python3-py.spec 0 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. jdulaney@gefjon:~/rpmbuild$ rpmlint ./python3-py-1.4.30-1.el7.src.rpm python3-py.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ini -> uni, in, ii python3-py.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) io -> oi, Io, ii python3-py.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US svn -> sen, sin, son python3-py.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US apipkg -> Apia python3-py.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US iniconfig -> confiding python3-py.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ini -> uni, in, ii 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. Only issue I see is the Group tag needs to be nixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290922] Review Request: moose - Multiscale Neuroscience and Systems Biology Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- moose-3.0.2-0.4.fc22.beta.2 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290922] Review Request: moose - Multiscale Neuroscience and Systems Biology Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290922 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2015-12-30 20:51:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.fc22, php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.fc22, php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.fc22, php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-2e659d43aa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-87ab6ca223 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294341] Review Request: nodejs-dreamopt - Command-line parser with readable syntax from your sweetest dreams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294341 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-dreamopt-0.8.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-4d868754c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277470] Review Request: php-nette-application - Nette Application MVC Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277470 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-application-2.3.8-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-bf0bfc4559 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2015-90322d5a7f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-py.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-py-1.4.30-2.el7.src.rpm * Wed Dec 30 2015 Orion Poplawski - 1.4.30-2 - Drop group tag - Minor cleanup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704
Ville Skyttä changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ville.sky...@iki.fi
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #4 from Ville Skyttä ---
Summary and %description should say "Python 3" because this is Python 3 only.
Summary and %description for the binary package should probably say "Python
%{python3_version}" instead of "Python 3".
Group tags should go away.
with_check deserves a comment why it's not on by default. For now I think it's
because pytest and mock are not available yet, but still.
%with_check and %build_wheel would be better implemented using the standard
%bcond_with/out.
pip3 in %install should probably be made more specific. pip-%{python3_version}?
psfl.txt and zpl.txt should be %license, not %doc.
What is the source for psfl.txt and zpl.txt?
psfl.txt talks about Python 2.1.1. Should it be updated to something newer?
Rest of the docs would be better installed as "%doc docs/*" to avoid one
unnecessary dir.
/usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py has a wrong
shebang, "/usr/bin/env python". I believe /usr/bin/env should not be used in
the first place for system installed stuff like this, and "python" should
probably be "python%{python3_version}" or "%{__python3}"
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277161] Review Request: mod_mono - ASP.NET module for Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277161 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(james.hogarth@gma | |il.com) | --- Comment #8 from James Hogarth --- Apologies - Christmas happened and I've been unable to spend time on completing the review as a result .. Going through it now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266939] Review Request: kf5-purpose - Framework for providing abstractions to get the developer's purposes fulfilled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266939
--- Comment #1 from Mattia Verga ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[!]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
rpmlint kf5-purpose-1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
kf5-purpose.src: W: invalid-url Source0:
http://download.kde.org/stable/purpose/1.0/purpose-1.0.tar.xz HTTP Error 404:
Not Found
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-
[Bug 1266939] Review Request: kf5-purpose - Framework for providing abstractions to get the developer's purposes fulfilled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266939 Mattia Verga changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Mattia Verga --- Package APPROVED but you need to fix the wrong URL of the source file before importing in SCM. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277161] Review Request: mod_mono - ASP.NET module for Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277161 James Hogarth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||claudiorodrigo@pereyradiaz. ||com.ar Flags||needinfo?(claudiorodrigo@pe ||reyradiaz.com.ar) --- Comment #9 from James Hogarth --- Okay so installing the build on a minimal fedora rawhide instance and a basic index.aspx I get this on trying to access it (selinux set to permissive for initial testing): Wed Dec 30 13:53:59.964922 2015] [core:notice] [pid 9081] SELinux policy enabled; httpd running as context system_u:system_r:httpd_t:s0 [Wed Dec 30 13:53:59.967668 2015] [suexec:notice] [pid 9081] AH01232: suEXEC mechanism enabled (wrapper: /usr/sbin/suexec) [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.013541 2015] [:crit] [pid 9081] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. AH00558: httpd: Could not reliably determine the server's fully qualified domain name, using localhost.localdomain. Set the 'ServerName' directive globally to suppress this message [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.017200 2015] [auth_digest:notice] [pid 9081] AH01757: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.017891 2015] [http2:warn] [pid 9081] AH02951: mod_ssl does not seem to be enabled [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.020233 2015] [lbmethod_heartbeat:notice] [pid 9081] AH02282: No slotmem from mod_heartmonitor [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.020430 2015] [:crit] [pid 9081] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.115206 2015] [mpm_prefork:notice] [pid 9081] AH00163: Apache/2.4.18 (Fedora) mod_mono/3.12 configured -- resuming normal operations [Wed Dec 30 13:54:00.115361 2015] [core:notice] [pid 9081] AH00094: Command line: '/usr/sbin/httpd -D FOREGROUND' [Wed Dec 30 13:54:03.003383 2015] [:crit] [pid 9086] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:03.003913 2015] [:crit] [pid 9086] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:05.038859 2015] [:crit] [pid 9086] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:07.072555 2015] [:crit] [pid 9086] (13)Permission denied: Failed to create shared memory segment for backend 'XXGLOBAL' at '/var/run/mod_mono/mod_mono_dashboard_XXGLOBAL_1'. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:09.103687 2015] [:error] [pid 9086] Failed to connect to mod-mono-server after several attempts to spawn the process. [Wed Dec 30 13:54:09.127545 2015] [core:notice] [pid 9081] AH00052: child pid 9086 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) What am I missing from a fresh dnf install to test this properly? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277161] Review Request: mod_mono - ASP.NET module for Apache
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277161 --- Comment #10 from James Hogarth --- ah so /var/run/mod_mono needs to be owned by apache to create that shared memory segment ... so tmpfiles and %files needs to be updated to account for that ... still getting a mess trying to do a minimal index.aspx though ... <% HelloWorldLabel.Text = "Hello, world!"; %> http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd";> http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; > Untitled Page System.Web.Compilation.CompilationException CS1576: The line number specified for #line directive is missing or invalid Description: Error compiling a resource required to service this request. Review your source file and modify it to fix this error. Details: CS1576: The line number specified for #line directive is missing or invalid Error origin: Compiler Error source file: /index.aspx Exception stack trace: at System.Web.Compilation.AssemblyBuilder.BuildAssembly (System.Web.VirtualPath virtualPath, System.CodeDom.Compiler.CompilerParameters options) [0x0] in :0 at System.Web.Compilation.AssemblyBuilder.BuildAssembly (System.Web.VirtualPath virtualPath) [0x0] in :0 at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.GenerateAssembly (System.Web.Compilation.AssemblyBuilder abuilder, System.Web.Compilation.BuildProviderGroup group, System.Web.VirtualPath vp, Boolean debug) [0x0] in :0 at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.BuildInner (System.Web.VirtualPath vp, Boolean debug) [0x0] in :0 Some steps to test the module would be appreciated ... and don't forget to set the owner of /var/run/mod_mono correctly! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294839] New: Review Request: kf5-libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839 Bug ID: 1294839 Summary: Review Request: kf5-libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkipi.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkipi-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications Fedora Account System Username: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294839] Review Request: kf5-libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294838 (digikam-5.0) Alias||kf5-libkipi Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294838 [Bug 1294838] digikam-5.0 tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294839] Review Request: kf5-libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||656997 (kde-reviews) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294839] Review Request: kf5-libkipi - Common plugin infrastructure for KDE image applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294839 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rdieter's scratch build of kf5-libkipi-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12349155 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294841] New: Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841 Bug ID: 1294841 Summary: Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: arl...@arlionprojects.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org EPEL 6: Spec URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-el6.spec SRPM URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-1.2.7-1.el6.src.rpm Description: FSVS is a backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool for whole directory trees or filesystems, with a subversion repository as the backend. It can do overlays of multiple repositories, to achieve some content separation (base install, local modifications, etc.) Fedora Account System Username: Arlion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294841] Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841 --- Comment #1 from arl...@arlionprojects.com --- EPEL 7: Spec URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-el7.spec SRPM URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-1.2.7-1.el7.centos.src.rpm Description: FSVS is a backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool for whole directory trees or filesystems, with a subversion repository as the backend. It can do overlays of multiple repositories, to achieve some content separation (base install, local modifications, etc.) Fedora Account System Username: Arlion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294841] Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841 --- Comment #2 from arl...@arlionprojects.com --- Fedora 23 Spec URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-fc23.spec SRPM URL: http://arlionprojects.com/fsvs/fsvs-1.2.7-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: FSVS is a backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool for whole directory trees or filesystems, with a subversion repository as the backend. It can do overlays of multiple repositories, to achieve some content separation (base install, local modifications, etc.) Fedora Account System Username: Arlion I am also available on irc.freenode.net as arlion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294842] New: Review Request: kf5-libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294842 Bug ID: 1294842 Summary: Review Request: kf5-libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkdcraw.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkdcraw-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: A C++ interface around LibRaw library Fedora Account System Username: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294842] Review Request: kf5-libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294842 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294838 (digikam-5.0), ||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kf5-libkdcraw Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294838 [Bug 1294838] digikam-5.0 tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294841] Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841 --- Comment #3 from arl...@arlionprojects.com --- Finally, this is my very first package and need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294842] Review Request: kf5-libkdcraw - A C++ interface around LibRaw library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294842 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rdieter's scratch build of kf5-libkdcraw-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12349211 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski ---
(In reply to Ville Skyttä from comment #4)
> Summary and %description should say "Python 3" because this is Python 3 only.
>
> Summary and %description for the binary package should probably say "Python
> %{python3_version}" instead of "Python 3".
The name of the package "python3X-setuptools" will be displayed next to
summaries and description and I think makes this point.
> Group tags should go away.
Gone.
> with_check deserves a comment why it's not on by default. For now I think
> it's because pytest and mock are not available yet, but still.
Added in a bootstrap flag.
> %with_check and %build_wheel would be better implemented using the standard
> %bcond_with/out.
Perhaps, but I'm going to stick with staying closer to the Fedora setuptools
package here.
> pip3 in %install should probably be made more specific.
> pip-%{python3_version}?
Looks like probably pip%{python3_version}.
> psfl.txt and zpl.txt should be %license, not %doc.
>
> What is the source for psfl.txt and zpl.txt?
>
> psfl.txt talks about Python 2.1.1. Should it be updated to something newer?
I've done so. And added ASL 2.0 since there appear to be some files under that
license. It's a bit of a mess and there is an upstream issue with no response:
https://bitbucket.org/pypa/setuptools/issues/132/missing-license
> Rest of the docs would be better installed as "%doc docs/*" to avoid one
> unnecessary dir.
Fixed.
> /usr/lib/python3.4/site-packages/setuptools/command/easy_install.py has a
> wrong shebang, "/usr/bin/env python". I believe /usr/bin/env should not be
> used in the first place for system installed stuff like this, and "python"
> should probably be "python%{python3_version}" or "%{__python3}"
Removed the unneeded shbang.
Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools.spec
SRPM URL:
http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-setuptools-19.2-2.el7.src.rpm
* Wed Dec 29 2015 Orion Poplawski - 19.2-2
- Drop group tag
- Add bootstrap conditional
- Use specific pip version
- Use %%license
- Update license and license source
- Strip unneeded shbangs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1279175] Review Request: innoextract - Tool to extract installers created by Inno Setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279175 Hans de Goede changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Hans de Goede --- Hi, (In reply to Alexandre Detiste from comment #5) > Hi, > > This time I didn't forgot to provide the SRPM, here it is: > > https://github.com/a-detiste/fedora/blob/master/innoextract-1.5-3.src. > rpm?raw=true Looks good now: Approved! I've gone ahead and added you to the packagers group in FAS and sponsored you. Regards, Hans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294852] New: Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852 Bug ID: 1294852 Summary: Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libksane.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libksane-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: SANE Library interface for KDE Fedora Account System Username: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294852] Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294838 (digikam-5.0), ||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kf5-libksane Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294838 [Bug 1294838] digikam-5.0 tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294852] Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rdieter's scratch build of kf5-libksane-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12349465 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] New: Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 Bug ID: 1294856 Summary: Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytest.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytest-2.8.5-1.el7.src.rpm Description: py.test provides simple, yet powerful testing for Python. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294856 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 [Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704, 1294711, 1294713 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 [Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294713 [Bug 1294713] Build python-mock for python3 in EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294856 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 [Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 John Dulaney changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jdula...@fedoraproject.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294858] Review Request: kf5-libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294858 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294838 (digikam-5.0), ||656997 (kde-reviews) Alias||kf5-libkface Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656997 [Bug 656997] kde-related package review tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294838 [Bug 1294838] digikam-5.0 tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294858] New: Review Request: kf5-libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294858 Bug ID: 1294858 Summary: Review Request: kf5-libkface - A face recognition and detection library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rdie...@math.unl.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkface.spec SRPM URL: https://rdieter.fedorapeople.org/rpms/kf5/kf5-libkface-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: A face recognition and detection library Fedora Account System Username: rdieter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292061] Review Request: perl-POE-Loop-Event - Bridge that allows POE to be driven by Event.pm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292061 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-POE-Loop-Event-1.305-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1222334] Review Request: bup - Efficient backup system based on git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222334 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System --- bup-0.27-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290450] Review Request: exonerate - A generic tool for sequence alignment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290450 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- exonerate-2.2.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281991] Review Request: qt4-style-fusion - Fusion widget style for Qt4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281991 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- qt4-style-fusion-0-1.hg20151214.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #1 from John Dulaney --- Build currently fails with: DEBUG util.py:399: Error: No Package found for python34-mock DEBUG util.py:399: Error: No Package found for python34-py >= 1.4.29 DEBUG util.py:399: Error: No Package found for python34-setuptools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #2 from Orion Poplawski --- Right - that's why this bug depends on those reviews/packages. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294858] Review Request: kf5-libkface - A face recognition and detection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294858 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- rdieter's scratch build of kf5-libkface-15.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12349633 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294860] Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294860] New: Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 Bug ID: 1294860 Summary: Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-coverage.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-coverage-4.0.3-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Coverage.py is a Python module that measures code coverage during Python execution. It uses the code analysis tools and tracing hooks provided in the Python standard library to determine which lines are executable, and which have been executed. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294860 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 [Bug 1294860] Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1086245] Review Request: nodejs-jsonstream -streaming JSON.parse and stringify for Node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086245 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-jsonstream-0.10.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294862] New: Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294862 Bug ID: 1294862 Summary: Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-nose.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-nose-1.3.7-1.el7.src.rpm Description: nose extends the test loading and running features of unittest, making it easier to write, find and run tests. By default, nose will run tests in files or directories under the current working directory whose names include "test" or "Test" at a word boundary (like "test_this" or "functional_test" or "TestClass" but not "libtest"). Test output is similar to that of unittest, but also includes captured stdout output from failing tests, for easy print-style debugging. These features, and many more, are customizable through the use of plugins. Plugins included with nose provide support for doctest, code coverage and profiling, flexible attribute-based test selection, output capture and more. Fedora Account System Username: orion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294862 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294862 [Bug 1294862] Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294860] Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294862 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294862 [Bug 1294862] Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294862] Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294862 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294704, 1294860 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 [Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 [Bug 1294860] Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294704] Review Request: python3-setuptools - Easily build and distribute Python packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294704 --- Comment #6 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294711] Review Request: python3-py - Library with cross-python path, ini-parsing, io, code, log facilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294711 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294717] Review Request: python3-PyYAML - YAML parser and emitter for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294717 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294714] Review Request: python3-chardet - Character encoding auto-detection in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294714 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 --- Comment #3 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294860] Review Request: python3-coverage - Code coverage testing module for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294860 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294862] Review Request: python3-nose - Discovery-based unittest extension for Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294862 --- Comment #1 from Orion Poplawski --- Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1285941] Review Request: python-flower - A web based tool for monitoring and administrating Celery clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1285941
--- Comment #19 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
1. [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/flower
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /etc/flower
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/flower
2. Looks like there some files with a /usr/bin/python sheban than make
python3-flower requires both python2(abi) and python3.
3. Upstream provides a Dockerfile, Vagrantfile and a ansible playbook than can
be good to include in this package, also do not forget to send the unit file to
upstream, apen a pull request and link the pull request in the spec.
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
[Bug 1277434] Review Request: php-nette-mail - Nette Mail: Sending E-mails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277434 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-mail-2.3.4-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-4f6a9e4c87 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277470] Review Request: php-nette-application - Nette Application MVC Component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277470 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-nette-application-2.3.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-b0f60fc86f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294865] New: Review Request: python3-six - Python 2 and 3 compatibility utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294865 Bug ID: 1294865 Summary: Review Request: python3-six - Python 2 and 3 compatibility utilities Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Orion Poplawski 2015-12-30 13:09:58 EST Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-six.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-six-1.10.0-1.el7.src.rpm Description: python-six provides simple utilities for wrapping over differences between Python 2 and Python 3. Fedora Account System Username: orion Copr: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/g/python/python3_epel7/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1292895] Review Request: php-pear-crypt-gpg - GNU Privacy Guard (GnuPG)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292895 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-pear-crypt-gpg-1.4.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-c9487192e2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294865] Review Request: python3-six - Python 2 and 3 compatibility utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294865 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1294856 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 [Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294856] Review Request: python3-pytest - Simple powerful testing with Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294856 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1294865 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294865 [Bug 1294865] Review Request: python3-six - Python 2 and 3 compatibility utilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1290302] Review Request: php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db - Reference Database to be used with php-compatinfo library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1290302 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- php-bartlett-PHP-CompatInfo-5.0.0-1.el7, php-bartlett-PHP-Reflect-4.0.0-1.el7, php-bartlett-php-compatinfo-db-1.3.0-1.el7, php-bartlett-umlwriter-1.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-11293d0823 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
