[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's scratch build of octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12617065 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #11 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet --- Thanks, SCM request open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet --- Damn... Good catch... https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/8f9c12fbc6d0343d370531f9fa9bfe8f61797463 Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/8f9c12fbc6d0343d370531f9fa9bfe8f61797463/php/php-mcnetic-zipstreamer/php-mcnetic-zipstreamer.spec Srpm: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-mcnetic-zipstreamer-0.7-1.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #8 from Shawn Iwinski ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #7)
> From the source headers:
>
> https://github.com/interfasys/lognormalizer/blob/master/src/Normalizer.php
>
> * This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License version 3 or
> * later. See the COPYING file.
>
> So I think, this is really "AGPLv3+" (of course, COPYING is the v3)
Sorry, I missed that.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license.
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet --- From the source headers: https://github.com/interfasys/lognormalizer/blob/master/src/Normalizer.php * This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License version 3 or * later. See the COPYING file. So I think, this is really "AGPLv3+" (of course, COPYING is the v3) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 --- Comment #9 from Shawn Iwinski --- [!]: Latest version is packaged. Latest version is 0.7, not 1.7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 --- Comment #7 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116505 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116505&action=edit phpcompatinfo-lib.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 --- Comment #8 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116506 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116506&action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1296901 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sh...@iwin.ski Assignee|james.hoga...@gmail.com |sh...@iwin.ski Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski --- James -- Hopefully you won't mind me taking this review? I did the review before realizing you had initially took it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296901] Review Request: php-mcnetic-zipstreamer - Stream zip files without i/o overhead
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296901 --- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116504 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116504&action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- Thanks, SCM request open. > If you would like, feel free to add me as a co-maintainer Of course, you're welcome. I don't see how to do it in the package request, I think I will have to do it after import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #6 from Shawn Iwinski --- [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Actual license = AGPLv3 Spec license = AGPLv3+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116501 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116501&action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1298649 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116499 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116499&action=edit phpcompatinfo-lib.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116497 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116497&action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298649] Review Request: php-interfasys-lognormalizer - Parses variables and converts them to string
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298649 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sh...@iwin.ski Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sh...@iwin.ski Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- Thanks, SCM request open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import
This library was one of the ones on my list to get to. If you would like, feel
free to add me as a co-maintainer and I'll also help with the adapters
packaging.
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- Thanks, SCM request open. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116496 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116496&action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1298475 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116495 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116495&action=edit phpcompatinfo-lib.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sh...@iwin.ski Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sh...@iwin.ski Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1298475] Review Request: php-league-flysystem - Filesystem abstraction: Many filesystems, one API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298475 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116494 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116494&action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116493 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116493&action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1296939 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116492 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116492&action=edit phpcompatinfo-lib.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116491 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116491&action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1296939] Review Request: php-owncloud-tarstreamer - Streaming dynamic tar files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1296939 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sh...@iwin.ski Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sh...@iwin.ski Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476
Shawn Iwinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Shawn Iwinski ---
[!]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
Note: rm -rf %{buildroot} present but not required
[!]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4
Note: %defattr present but not needed
[!]: Buildroot is not present
Note: Buildroot: present but not needed
[!]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
Note: %clean present but not required
As usual, remove EPEL 5 bits after initial import
No blockers.
= APPROVED =
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476 --- Comment #4 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116490 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116490&action=edit fedora-review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1277476 Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 Active plugins: Generic, PHP, Shell-api Disabled plugins: Java, C/C++, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R, Ruby Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116488 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116488&action=edit phpcompatinfo-full.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476 --- Comment #3 from Shawn Iwinski --- Created attachment 1116489 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1116489&action=edit phpcompatinfo-lib.log phpCompatInfo version 4.5.2 DB built Nov 26 2015 14:29:15 CET -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1277476] Review Request: php-nette-bootstrap - Nette Bootstrap
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277476 Shawn Iwinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||sh...@iwin.ski Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sh...@iwin.ski Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300158] New: Review Request: python-editorconfig - A python based distribution of EditorConfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158 Bug ID: 1300158 Summary: Review Request: python-editorconfig - A python based distribution of EditorConfig Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: barracks...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://barracks510.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-editorconfig.spec SRPM URL: https://barracks510.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-editorconfig-0.12.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: EditorConfig Python Core provides the same functionality as the EditorConfig C Core. EditorConfig Python core can be used as a an importable library. Fedora Account System Username: barracks510 Koji Build Link: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12588706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1291169] Review Request: ccdciel - CCD capture software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- ccdciel-0.2.0-10.20160105svn.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-132a0dbc91 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293156] Review Request: lxqt-sudo - GUI frontend for sudo/su
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- liblxqt-0.10.0-7.fc23, libqtxdg-1.3.0-2.fc23, lxqt-about-0.10.0-3.fc23, lxqt-common-0.10.0-7.fc23, lxqt-config-0.10.0-3.fc23, lxqt-notificationd-0.10.0-3.fc23, lxqt-panel-0.10.0-4.fc23, lxqt-policykit-0.10.0-2.fc23, lxqt-powermanagement-0.10.0-2.fc23, lxqt-sudo-0.10.0-4.fc23, pcmanfm-qt-0.10.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d67a0d6bcc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- jcuber-4.3.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0eede362ef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299313] Review Request: nodejs-is-retry-allowed - Is retry allowed for Error?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299313 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-is-retry-allowed-1.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b69b2bf35a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1293214] Review Request: python-betamax - A VCR imitation for python-requests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293214 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-betamax-0.5.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3c7aa108b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- jcuber-4.3.3-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c48f771e46 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- jcuber-4.3.3-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-ab59601aab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1269844] Review Request: jcuber - CUBE reader for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269844 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- jcuber-4.3.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-767f71fba2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294277] Review Request: python-vxi11 - Python implementation of the VXI-11 protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294277 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-vxi11-0.8-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294277] Review Request: python-vxi11 - Python implementation of the VXI-11 protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294277 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-vxi11-0.8-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300092] Review Request: socketIO-client - A socket.io client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300092 Paul Wouters changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pwout...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwout...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's scratch build of octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12614261 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1249329] Review Request: percol - Interactive selection to the traditional pipe concept on UNIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249329 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- percol-0.1.1-0.4.git.b567f41.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281876] Review Request: enki - Extensible text editor for programmers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129429] Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- ccnet-5.0.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1281876] Review Request: enki - Extensible text editor for programmers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1281876 --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System --- enki-15.11.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1116178] Review Request: python-socketio-client - A socket.io client library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1116178 Jan Včelák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||jv+fed...@fcelda.cz Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:36:18 --- Comment #5 from Jan Včelák --- I've closed this review request as there was no progress over a year. And I've created a new one — with current version and reflecting current packaging guidelines. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1300092 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300092] Review Request: socketIO-client - A socket.io client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300092 Jan Včelák changed: What|Removed |Added CC||puiterw...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jan Včelák --- *** Bug 1116178 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300092] New: Review Request: socketIO-client - A socket.io client library for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300092 Bug ID: 1300092 Summary: Review Request: socketIO-client - A socket.io client library for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jv+fed...@fcelda.cz QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/socketIO-client/0.6.5-1/socketIO-client.spec SRPM URL: https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/socketIO-client/0.6.5-1/socketIO-client-0.6.5-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: The socketIO-client is a Python client library for socket.io. Fedora Account System Username: jvcelak COPR build: https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jvcelak/ripe-atlas-tools/package/socketIO-client/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129429] Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- ccnet-5.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1129429] Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:30:06 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1160671] Review Request: seafile - Cloud storage system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671 Bug 1160671 depends on bug 1129429, which changed state. Bug 1129429 Summary: Review Request: ccnet - A framework for writing networked applications in C https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129429 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1287120] Review Request: python-ryu - component-based Software-defined Networking Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287120 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:29:38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1287120] Review Request: python-ryu - component-based Software-defined Networking Framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287120 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- python-ryu-3.26-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1249329] Review Request: percol - Interactive selection to the traditional pipe concept on UNIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249329 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:29:22 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1249329] Review Request: percol - Interactive selection to the traditional pipe concept on UNIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1249329 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- percol-0.1.1-0.4.git.b567f41.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197333] Review Request: polyglot-chess - Polyglot chess opening book program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- polyglot-chess-1.4-5.20140902gitf46ee06.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1197333] Review Request: polyglot-chess - Polyglot chess opening book program
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1197333 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:28:13 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1295108] Review Request: mycli - Nice command line interface for MySQL Database with auto-completion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295108 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- mycli-1.5.2-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1295108] Review Request: mycli - Nice command line interface for MySQL Database with auto-completion and syntax highlighting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295108 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-01-19 18:28:08 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's scratch build of octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12612606 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's scratch build of octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for f23 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12612612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- cbm's scratch build of octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm for rawhide failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12612204 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #2 from Colin Macdonald --- $ koji build --scratch rawhide octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12612204 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 --- Comment #1 from Colin Macdonald --- Note: tarball exists on github but is not yet on sourceforge (which is the official upstream tarball). It should be there soon and I'll post when it is. Note: I didn't use %doc, even where some other octave-* packages did. My reasoning re: "doc-cache" file: > To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly > if it is not > present. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300070] New: Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300070 Bug ID: 1300070 Summary: Review Request: octave-doctest - Documentation tests for Octave Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: c...@m.fsf.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://cbm.fedorapeople.org/octave-doctest.spec SRPM URL: https://cbm.fedorapeople.org/octave-doctest-0.4.1-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: The Octave-forge Doctest package finds specially-formatted blocks of example code within documentation files. It then executes the code and confirms the output is correct. This can be useful as part of a testing framework or simply to ensure that documentation stays up-to-date during software development. Fedora Account System Username: cbm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299637] Review Request: pam_wrapper - A tool to test PAM applications and PAM modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jhrozek's scratch build of pam_wrapper-1.0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12611543 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299637] Review Request: pam_wrapper - A tool to test PAM applications and PAM modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Hrozek --- Thank you for the review. Fixed packages are at: Spec URL: https://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/pam_wrapper/pam_wrapper.spec SRPM URL: https://jhrozek.fedorapeople.org/pam_wrapper/pam_wrapper-1.0.1-2.fc22.src.rpm koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12611543 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 Tom Hughes changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Tom Hughes --- Looks good now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #7 from Jared Smith --- Updated. The dependency nodejs-buffertools was just recently approved, so it'll be going into rawhide shortly. Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-only-shallow/nodejs-only-shallow.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-only-shallow/nodejs-only-shallow-1.2.0-4.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300005] Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135 --- Comment #2 from Alberto Ruiz --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12609082 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300003] Review Request: fleet-commander - Admin interface for Fleet Commander
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133 --- Comment #2 from Alberto Ruiz --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12609074 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300005] Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135 --- Comment #1 from Alberto Ruiz --- This is the first package (alongside the one in #133) that I submit, even though I already maintain the package ino, so I am probably going to need a sponsor, I am also the maintainer of the upstream Fleet Commander project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300003] Review Request: fleet-commander - Admin interface for Fleet Commander
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=133 --- Comment #1 from Alberto Ruiz --- This is the first package (alongside the one in #135) that I submit, even though I already maintain the package ino, so I am probably going to need a sponsor, I am also the maintainer of the upstream Fleet Commander project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300005] New: Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135 Bug ID: 135 Summary: Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: aruiz...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/fleet-commander/fc-client/blob/0.7.0/fleet-commander-client.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/fleet-commander/fc-client/releases/download/0.7.0/fleet-commander-client-0.7.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts Fedora Account System Username: aruiz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150
--- Comment #5 from Tom Hughes ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in /home/tom/1273150-nodejs-only-
shallow/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[-]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: nodejs-only-shallow-1.2.0-3.fc24.noarch.rpm
nodejs-only-shal
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #6 from Tom Hughes --- You added the license file as SOURCE1 but you're not actually including it in the build package. The require on nodejs is also unnecessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/nodejs-buffertools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #4 from Tom Hughes --- Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-only-shallow/nodejs-only-shallow.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-only-shallow/nodejs-only-shallow-1.2.0-3.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1295685] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Modern password hashing for your software and your servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295685 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-bcrypt-2.0.0-3.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9a9a2ff0d9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1295685] Review Request: python-bcrypt - Modern password hashing for your software and your servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299533] Review Request: perl-App-Cme - Check or edit configuration data with Config::Model
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299533 --- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata --- * Missing buildtime dependencies: - coreutils, used in the SPEC file, line 65 - sed, used in the SPEC file, line 54 * You only need Config::Model 2.063 for build; 2.068 is required by the update command which isn't tested. * Config::Model::FuseUI could be a recommended runtime dependency. * You might want to filter out that `perl(Config::Model) >= 2.063' runtime dependency. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299637] Review Request: pam_wrapper - A tool to test PAM applications and PAM modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637 --- Comment #2 from Andreas Schneider --- Missing: BuildRequires: doxygen -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 Parag AN(पराग) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #12 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Review: + package builds fine in f24-nodejs4 tag which is going to get merged into f24 soon + Source verified with upstream as (sha256sum) upstream source:1a650a9de86eb1e1e1930812efaa88ef408e67e3017426b6745f66a958f377f0 buffertools-2.1.3.tgz.1 srpm source: 1a650a9de86eb1e1e1930812efaa88ef408e67e3017426b6745f66a958f377f0 buffertools-2.1.3.tgz.1 + License is "ISC" which is valid license and included in LICENSE file. + package follows nodejs packaging guidelines. Suggestions: 1) "%install" line is missing which cause few rpmlint "rpm-buildroot-usage" warnings. Just add that line back. APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1273150] Review Request: nodejs-only-shallow - Like `deeper` and `deepest`, but less strict, and with 90s flavor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273150 --- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-only-shallow-1.2.0-3.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606794 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299637] Review Request: pam_wrapper - A tool to test PAM applications and PAM modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299637 Andreas Schneider changed: What|Removed |Added CC||a...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Andreas Schneider --- pam_wrapper.spec | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pam_wrapper.spec b/pam_wrapper.spec index c978ce0..76a77d2 100644 --- a/pam_wrapper.spec +++ b/pam_wrapper.spec @@ -49,8 +49,8 @@ Recommends: pkgconfig %description -n libpamtest-devel If you plan to develop tests for a PAM module you can use this library, -which simplifies testing of modules. This subpackage includes the header -files for libpamtest +which simplifies testing of modules. This sub package includes the header +files for libpamtest. %package -n libpamtest-doc Summary:The libpamtest API documentation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #11 from Jared Smith --- And finally, a build that works on ARM and with the npm(bindings) module. Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-7.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #10 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-7.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606706 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #9 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-6.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606583 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-6.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606554 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #7 from Jared Smith --- Updated packages to add a patch to use the npm(bindings) module instead of hard-coding the path to the native code. Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-6.fc24.src.rpm Starting a scratch build now... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299907] New: Review Request: php-pecl-pq - PostgreSQL client library (libpq) binding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299907 Bug ID: 1299907 Summary: Review Request: php-pecl-pq - PostgreSQL client library (libpq) binding Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: fed...@famillecollet.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/d70d87c4b91df81796ae73c5fe114b4cd4d29a9b/php/pecl/php-pecl-pq/php-pecl-pq.spec SRPM URL: http://rpms.famillecollet.com/SRPMS/php-pecl-pq-1.0.0-2.remi.src.rpm Description: PostgreSQL client library (libpq) binding. Documents: http://devel-m6w6.rhcloud.com/mdref/pq Highlights: * Nearly complete support for asynchronous usage * Extended type support by pg_type * Fetching simple multi-dimensional array maps * Working Gateway implementation Fedora Account System Username: remi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #6 from Jared Smith --- Updated packages to fix building on ARM. Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-buffertools/nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-4.fc24.src.rpm Successful scratch build at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299843] Review Request: nodejs-buffertools - Working with node.js buffers made easy
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299843 --- Comment #5 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- jsmith's scratch build of nodejs-buffertools-2.1.3-4.fc24.src.rpm for f24-nodejs4 completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12606266 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1299583] Review Request: perl-Number-Fraction - Perl extension to model fractions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1299583 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Number-Fraction-2.00-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-2dfe3eff68 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
