[Bug 1246503] Review Request: golang-github-jonas-p-go-shp - Go library for reading and writing ESRI Shapefiles

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246503



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1298333] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-gexpect - Pure Go expect-like module

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298333



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1298154] Review Request: golang-github-hashicorp-errwrap - Errwrap is a Go (golang) library for wrapping and querying errors

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298154



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297531] Review Request: golang-github-golang-snappy - The Snappy compression format in the Go programming language.

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297531



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246593] Review Request: golang-github-golang-image - Go supplementary image libraries

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246593



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212226] Review Request: golang-github-garyburd-redigo - Go client for Redis

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212226



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1211821] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-gomemcache - Go Memcached client library

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1211821



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246524] Review Request: golang-github-remyoudompheng-bigfft - Big integer multiplication library for Go using FFT

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246524



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297537] Review Request: golang-github-google-go-github - Go library for accessing the GitHub API

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297537



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301565] Review Request: golang-github-jacobsa-oglematchers - Set of matchers for Go (inspired by Google Test for C++ and Google JS Test)

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301565



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246592] Review Request: golang-github-tgulacsi-picago - Picasa Go library for downloading photos

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246592



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297546] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-reflectwalk - A Go library for "walking" complex structures, similar to walking a filesystem.

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297546



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1212232] Review Request: golang-github-ugorji-go - Open-Source Go Code. msgpack.org[Go]

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1212232



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1060503] Review Request: golang-github-mitchellh-mapstructure - A Go library for decoding generic map values to structures and vice versa

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060503



--- Comment #3 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246526] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-mathutil - Utilities supplemental to the Go standard "rand" and "math" packages

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246526



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1298340] Review Request: golang-github-coreos-go-tspi - Bindings between libtspi and Go code

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1298340



--- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1206879] Review Request: golang-github-eknkc-amber - Amber is an elegant templating engine for Go Programming Language It is inspired from HAML and Jade

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1206879



--- Comment #2 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
jchaloup's scratch build of go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz for
cli-build/1454938967.533693.wYGVMBzT/go-memdb-9ea975b.tar.gz and f22-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902531

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297411] Review Request: pdc-client - Client library and console client for Product Definition Center

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ralph's scratch build of pdc-client-0.2.0.2-2.fc23.src.rpm for epel7-candidate
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902422

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297411] Review Request: pdc-client - Client library and console client for Product Definition Center

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411



--- Comment #6 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
ralph's scratch build of pdc-client-0.2.0.2-2.fc23.src.rpm for epel7-candidate
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902357

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297411] Review Request: pdc-client - Client library and console client for Product Definition Center

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297411

Ralph Bean  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rb...@redhat.com



--- Comment #5 from Ralph Bean  ---
Created attachment 1122176
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1122176&action=edit
A patch to make the default configuration point to fedora's prod instance.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1300005] Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135



--- Comment #5 from Alberto Ruiz  ---
This is the output of fedora-review:
http://fpaste.org/319838/45493809/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1160671] Review Request: seafile - Cloud storage system

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1160671



--- Comment #6 from Nikos Roussos  ---
Update to 5.0.5

SPEC: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/specs/seafile.spec
SRPM: https://comzeradd.fedorapeople.org/srpms/seafile-5.0.5-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1246177] libgsasl: reenable gssapi support

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246177

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 08:07:41



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183
[Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1010003 (bigdata-review)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010003
[Bug 1010003] bigdata-sig review-tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1189015] Review Request: python-MDAnalysis - Analyze and manipulate molecular dynamics trajectories

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189015



--- Comment #7 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
rathann's scratch build of python-MDAnalysis-0.13.0-1.fc23.src.rpm for f24
failed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12902046

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1300005] Review Request: fleet-commander-client - Profile data retriever for Fleet Commander client hosts

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=135



--- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
aruiz's scratch build of fleet-commander-client-0.7.0-2.fc23.src.rpm for f24
completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12901866

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305502] New: Review Request: python-adal - ADAL for Python

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305502

Bug ID: 1305502
   Summary: Review Request: python-adal - ADAL for Python
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: pikachu.2...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-adal/python-adal.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-adal/python-adal-0.1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: The ADAL for Python library makes it easy for python applications
to authenticate to AAD in order to access AAD protected web resources.
Fedora Account System Username: melmorabity

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305501] New: Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music player

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305501

Bug ID: 1305501
   Summary: Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music
player
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: projects...@smart.ms
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/yarok/yarock.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/yarok/yarock-1.1.5-3.fc23.src.rpm
Description: Lightweight, beautiful music player 
Fedora Account System Username: raphgro

Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=12901925

Note: This request is to unretire yarok in rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305501] Review Request: yarok - Lightweight, beautiful music player

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305501

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937
[Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305496] New: Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496

Bug ID: 1305496
   Summary: Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range
Histogram
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: tre...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram.spec
SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23.src.rpm

Description: HdrHistogram supports the recording and analyzing sampled data
value counts across a configurable integer value range with configurable value
precision within the range. Value precision is expressed as the number of
significant digits in the value recording, and provides control over value
quantization behavior across the value range and the subsequent value
resolution at any given level.

Fedora Account System Username: trepik

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
* Missing builddeps: gcc, perl-devel

* I'm not sure $LDFLAGS contains anything; consider using %{?__global_ldflags}.

* Consider packaging the examples directory as %doc.

* Again, you could drop the coreutils build dep if you modify the find calls.

* And again, this module also technically requires Test::More 0.88+.  Don't
  worry about it; I'm just mentioning it for completeness :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |



--- Comment #6 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
I am also sponsoring you into the packager group based on your contributions so
far. Welcome aboard and don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1301129] Review Request: hstr - Suggest box like shell history completion

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301129

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|domi...@greysector.net
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
Minor nitpicks:
1. Please use hstr instead of %{name}, it's shorter and more readable.
2. Drop 
   rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
   from %install

The above can be fixed upon import. Package APPROVED.

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated",
 "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 26 files have unknown license.
 Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/rathann/build/review/1301129-hstr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in hstr-
 debuginfo
[x]: Packag

[Bug 1304522] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304522

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304522] Review Request: python-pg8000 - Pure Python PostgreSQL Driver

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304522



--- Comment #7 from Christian Dersch  ---
Review done, already looks fine so far :) But I want to know why postgresql is
not a requirement but only an "Suggests". Is there any functionality without a
postgresql installation?


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated".
 36 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/review/1304522-python-pg8000/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages,
 /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.5/site-
 packages, /usr/lib/python3.5
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[?]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.

===> Package suggests postgresql, not requiring it. Will package do anything
useful without postgresql?

[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 768000 bytes in 38 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[?]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).

===> See comment @postgresql above

[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-pg8000 , python3-pg8000 , python-pg8000-docs
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text fil

[Bug 1159091] Review Request: openra - Libre/Free Real Time Strategy project [+Tracker to unbundle all dependencies]

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1159091

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1305303




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305303
[Bug 1305303] newtonsoft-json-8.0.2 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #2 from Petr Šabata  ---
(In reply to Petr Šabata from comment #1)
> * You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
>   with `-delete'.

Erm, coreutils, of course.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

gil cattaneo  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1297852] Review Request: python-azure-sdk - Microsoft Azure SDK for Python

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297852



--- Comment #1 from Mohamed El Morabity  ---
Update to 1.0.3:
Spec URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-sdk/python-azure-sdk.spec
SRPM URL:
https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-azure-sdk/python-azure-sdk-1.0.3-1.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 988102] Review Request: perl-DBD-Sybase - An interface for perl to connect with Sybase and MSSQL databases

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988102

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?



--- Comment #24 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski  ---
If anyone is still interested in having this in Fedora, please post current
spec and SRPM links.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305263] Review Request: perl-Text-Fuzzy - Partial string matching using edit distances

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305263

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305266] Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR, RFC7049)

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305266

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 05:04:03



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
This is already in Fedora.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1267179 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1267179] Review Request: perl-CBOR-XS - Concise Binary Object Representation (CBOR)

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267179

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||de...@fateyev.com



--- Comment #6 from Petr Šabata  ---
*** Bug 1305266 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
* You could drop the findutils builddep by substituting `-exec rm -f {} \;'
  with `-delete'.

* The actual required version of Test::More is 0.88 (as done_testing is
called).
  That's just nitpicking; upstream doesn't declare it either :)

* Require the versioned Path::Tiny and filter out the underspecified
  autogenerated dependency.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1304774] Review Request: perl-Function-Parameters - Subroutine definitions with parameter lists

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304774

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jples...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305294] Review Request: perl-Parse-Gitignore - Parse .gitignore files

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305294

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|psab...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1305261] Review Request: perl-Sereal - Fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305261

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||psab...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 04:43:40



--- Comment #1 from Petr Šabata  ---
This is already in Fedora.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1267198 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1267198] Review Request: perl-Sereal - Fast, compact, powerful binary (de-)serialization

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267198

Petr Šabata  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||de...@fateyev.com



--- Comment #5 from Petr Šabata  ---
*** Bug 1305261 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1303866] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1303866

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-02-08 04:39:58



--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1270317 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1270317] Review Request: lz4-java - LZ4 compression for Java

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270317

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)



--- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik  ---
*** Bug 1303866 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1294852] Review Request: kf5-libksane - SANE Library interface for KDE

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294852

Pier Luigi Fiorini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(pierluigi.fiorini |
   |@gmail.com) |



--- Comment #3 from Pier Luigi Fiorini  ---
Yes I will do it tonight. Sorry for the delay.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1264653] Review Request: php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6 - PHP HTTP client

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264653



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6-6.1.1-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292295] Review Request: nodejs-is-windows - Returns true if the platform is windows

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292295



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-is-windows-0.1.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1286867] Review Request: python-novaclient-os-virtual-interfaces - Adds Virtual Interfaces support to python-novaclient

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1286867



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-novaclient-os-virtual-interfaces-0.19-1.fc22 has been pushed to the
Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it
in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292232] Review Request: nodejs-delegates - Delegate methods and accessors to another property

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292232



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-delegates-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1292412] Review Request: nodejs-es6-symbol - ECMAScript 6 Symbol polyfill

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1292412



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
nodejs-es6-symbol-3.0.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5163d91411

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5163d91411

--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b80cee8936

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93cf1ddbfb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

[Bug 1277478] Review Request: php-nette-deprecated - APIs and features removed from Nette Framework

2016-02-08 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277478



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-93cf1ddbfb

--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-nette-deprecated-2.3.2-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL
6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-54356eb14f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review

<    1   2   3