[Bug 1315193] Review Request (EPEL): cmake3 - Cross-platform make system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315193] Review Request (EPEL): cmake3 - Cross-platform make system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- cmake3-3.5.0-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1b4a2161de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1308488] Review Request: mediaconch - Most relevant technical and tag data for video and audio files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308488 --- Comment #1 from Vasiliy Glazov --- Spec URL: http://raw.githubusercontent.com/RussianFedora/mediaconch/master/mediaconch.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.russianfedora.pro/kojifiles/packages/mediaconch/16.02/1.fc25.R/src/mediaconch-16.02-1.fc25.R.src.rpm Updated to 16.02. Corrected lecenses. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 Honggang LI changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1134688 is|| obsolete|| --- Comment #3 from Honggang LI --- Created attachment 1134700 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134700&action=edit spec review patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 --- Comment #2 from Honggang LI --- Created attachment 1134688 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1134688&action=edit spec review patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 --- Comment #1 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to dennis.dalessandro from comment #0) > Spec URL: > https://github.com/01org/opa-libhfi1verbs/releases/download/10_1/ > libhfi1verbs.spec Please see the attachment and update the spec file and the package. You also need update '%changelog' section. http://people.redhat.com/honli/.bcc4d86c9ce430ffc0c40ba4b877b7c6/libmlx5.spec Please take this one as example. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315319] Review Request: perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler - Check for the presence of a compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315319 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0.012-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a7ffad0e85 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1305669] Review Request: rubygem-benchmark-ips - An iterations per second enhancement to Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305669 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-benchmark-ips-2.5.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fbb3d19a5c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315020] Review Request: python-nmrglue - Python module for processing NMR data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-nmrglue-0.5-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3de505403e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- fasd-1.0.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-51695c64ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310796] Review Request: python-etcd - a python client for etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796 --- Comment #22 from Fedora Update System --- python-etcd-0.4.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5917b2c8ab -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315020] Review Request: python-nmrglue - Python module for processing NMR data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315020] Review Request: python-nmrglue - Python module for processing NMR data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-nmrglue-0.5-3.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3de505403e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315020] Review Request: python-nmrglue - Python module for processing NMR data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315020
--- Comment #13 from Mukundan Ragavan ---
(In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #10)
> Ok, this is looking great. I'm going to set it as passed review, but I'd
> urge you to consider adding more tests during %check to check you can import
> other modules than just the fileio modules. You can do simple checks just to
> see if the module successfully imports. Eg. (taken from python-lz4.spec):
>
> PYTHONPATH=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{python2_sitearch} %{__python2} -c "import lz4"
>
> These sorts of simple tests do actually catch breakage sometimes, so do have
> use.
>
> Thanks for your contribution to Fedora, and thanks for being so quick to
> respond to the review.
>
> APPROVED
I am going to email upstream about some tests that I see in the git repo. If
the tests will not be added to next release, I will add additional tests like
you have mentioned.
Thanks a lot for the quick review. Much appreciated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1309782] Review Request: bugyou_plugins - Plugins and Services for Bugyou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782 --- Comment #35 from Fedora Update System --- bugyou_plugins-0.1.3-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-f4d50f0e74 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1305154] Review Request: python-notario - A dictionary validator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305154 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-notario-0.0.11-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-7769ab249d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315193] Review Request (EPEL): cmake3 - Cross-platform make system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- cmake3-3.5.0-1.1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1b4a2161de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315307] Review Request: libarchive3 - A library for handling streaming archive formats
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315307 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- libarchive3-3.1.2-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a82c466e38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1314995] Review Request: pidgin-indicator - StatusNotifierItem tray icon plugin for Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-indicator-0.9-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0827c8907d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264288] Review Request: ghc-filemanip - Expressive file and directory manipulation for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264288 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-filemanip-0.3.6.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-42d5c716fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1208381] Review Request: gmavenplus-plugin - Integrates Groovy into Maven projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1208381 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- gmavenplus-plugin-1.5-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b73e30bc77 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1304996] Review Request: ghc-cmark - Fast, accurate CommonMark (Markdown) parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304996 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-cmark-0.5.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bd2c5e8b05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1305496] Review Request: HdrHistogram - A High Dynamic Range Histogram
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305496 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- HdrHistogram-2.1.8-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3cc7c1c581 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315022] Review Request: xfpanel-switch - A simple application to manage Xfce panel layouts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- xfpanel-switch-1.0.3-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-858811aa83 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1309782] Review Request: bugyou_plugins - Plugins and Services for Bugyou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782 --- Comment #34 from Fedora Update System --- bugyou_plugins-0.1.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d0739aa4e1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310796] Review Request: python-etcd - a python client for etcd
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310796 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- python-etcd-0.4.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cbd4c896de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1308742] Review Request: collectd5 - Statistics collection daemon for filling RRD files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308742 Ruben Kerkhof changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1172771] Review Request: ocaml-cmdliner - OCaml library for dealing with command line arguments
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1172771 --- Comment #21 from Jerry James --- This review is stalled. Jon, please respond within one week if you intend to continue with this review. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1115881] Review Request: scheme48 - Scheme48 Scheme implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115881 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2016-03-09 17:46:18 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1098950] Review Request: vinterm - Vintage-style terminal emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1098950 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | Last Closed||2016-03-09 17:42:36 --- Comment #5 from Jerry James --- Closing due to lack of response from the submitter. Reopen this bug if you wish to continue the review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1313477] Review Request: ceph-ansible - Ansible playbooks for Ceph
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313477 François Cami changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from François Cami --- All required changes have been implemented, therefore ceph-ansible is approved as-is. Please fix Ansbile=> Ansible (in a comment) before building though. BTW I'd like to co-maintain if you don't mind. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316284] New: Review Request: python-htmlmin - HTML Minifier
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316284 Bug ID: 1316284 Summary: Review Request: python-htmlmin - HTML Minifier Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: juj...@jujens.eu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://dl.jujens.eu/SPECS/python-htmlmin.spec SRPM URL: http://dl.jujens.eu/SRPMS/python-htmlmin-0.1.10-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: A configurable HTML Minifier with safety features. Fedora Account System Username: jujens -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1314995] Review Request: pidgin-indicator - StatusNotifierItem tray icon plugin for Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314995 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-indicator-0.9-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-51a4de5f33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1264288] Review Request: ghc-filemanip - Expressive file and directory manipulation for Haskell
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264288 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-filemanip-0.3.6.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3d3e7dbde8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1304996] Review Request: ghc-cmark - Fast, accurate CommonMark (Markdown) parser and renderer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1304996 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-cmark-0.5.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-6f0af32e54 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1309782] Review Request: bugyou_plugins - Plugins and Services for Bugyou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #33 from Fedora Update System --- bugyou_plugins-0.1.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-27d0f811a2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315871] Review Request: python-mdp - Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871 --- Comment #9 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- I reported the test failure on the mdp mailing list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315871] Review Request: python-mdp - Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-mdp-3.5-2.fc22 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2016-03-09 16:11:44 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316189] Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||tlsh-3.4.5-1.fc22 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE Last Closed||2016-03-09 16:09:48 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315912] Review Request: diffoscope - In-depth comparison of files, archives, and directories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315912 Bug 1315912 depends on bug 1316189, which changed state. Bug 1316189 Summary: Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315021] Review Request: openvibe - A software platform for brain-computer interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315021 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- (In reply to Dmitry Mikhirev from comment #10) > > Please always link to the raw spec file for fedora-review's sake. > I'm sorry. Not a big problem, just an additional step. > > No %check (apart from the desktop files and appdata) :( > I did not add running tests because they require X server connection. I > supposed that there should be a workaround, but I found the page > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/GraphicalTests only after > submitting this review request. So I can try to enable tests now. I think it's useful. At least checking if the binaries actually run can be useful: $ /usr/bin/openvibe-external-application-launcher /usr/bin/openvibe-external-application-launcher: line 24: /usr/bin/: Is a directory It seems that something is wrong here. > > Installation fails with: > > nothing provides libquat.so.07()(64bit) needed by > > openvibe-1.1.0-1.fc25.x86_64. > Right, it is provided by vrpn package. Oh, OK. I didn't notice that. With vrpn installed everything installs fine. Package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1310793] Review Request: unqlite - Transactional Embedded Database Engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310793 --- Comment #11 from Richard Shaw --- (In reply to Paulo Henrique Rodrigues Pinheiro from comment #5) > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #4) > > (In reply to Paulo Henrique Rodrigues Pinheiro from comment #3) > > > (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #2) > > (...) > > > After this, to "silent" rpmlint, I put a strip in make install. > > > > Not sure what is going on here, I removed the strip command and get a usable > > debuginfo package. > > Some issue in my config. In spec I put this line: > > %debug_package > > > And now I get the debuginfo package. There might be something quirky in your setup. fedora-review doesn't like the explicit %debug_package because it's inserted automatically so it's complaining about the debuginfo package already existing. I dug into the license patch and it appears to just be to convert line endings. Patching the license is generally not allowed but I'm having trouble finding where in the guidelines that is said. What I usually do in this case is use dos2unix BuildRequires: dos2unix ... dos2unix license.txt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1083962] Review Request: maxscale - A database-centric proxy that works with MariaDB and MySQL
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1083962
--- Comment #26 from Honza Horak ---
There are only couple of issues, but it looks good generally.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/maxscale/COPYRIGHT
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
Note: These BR are not needed: redhat-rpm-config
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
- ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
Note: /sbin/ldconfig not called in maxscale
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Shared_Libraries
- Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/logrotate.d,
/var/lib/maxscale/etc
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[!]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Note: See rpmlint output
RPATH is actually defined in binaries and libraries (plugins)
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or
later)", "LGPL (v2.1)", "Unknown or generated". 41 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/hhorak/tmp/maxscale-
review/1083962-maxscale/licensecheck.txt
This combination is valid.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /var/lib/maxscale/etc
This should be fixed.
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/logrotate.d,
/var/lib/maxscale/etc
This should be fixed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
It would be better to remove bundled pcre2 from source to be sure it is not
used during build.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large docume
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 Jan Včelák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2016-03-09 15:40:17 --- Comment #7 from Jan Včelák --- (In reply to Jaroslav Škarvada from comment #1) > Comments: > Package doesn't seem to preserver timestamps on installed files, patch > should be pull requested upstream: > -INSTALL?= install > +INSTALL?= install -p Reported upstream: https://github.com/clvv/fasd/pull/83 Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- fasd-1.0.1-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-51695c64ac -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- fasd-1.0.1-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-931cee65c9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- fasd-1.0.1-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-1e28b4c3d4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- fasd-1.0.1-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-5762c2c812 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315871] Review Request: python-mdp - Library for building data processing pipelines for machine learning
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315871 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-mdp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316189] Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189 --- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/tlsh -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315021] Review Request: openvibe - A software platform for brain-computer interfaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315021 --- Comment #10 from Dmitry Mikhirev --- > Please always link to the raw spec file for fedora-review's sake. I'm sorry. > No %check (apart from the desktop files and appdata) :( I did not add running tests because they require X server connection. I supposed that there should be a workaround, but I found the page https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/GraphicalTests only after submitting this review request. So I can try to enable tests now. > Use appstream-util validate-relax --nonet, otherwise it fails in mock. OK. > Installation fails with: > nothing provides libquat.so.07()(64bit) needed by > openvibe-1.1.0-1.fc25.x86_64. Right, it is provided by vrpn package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270032] Review Request: golang-github-bugsnag-bugsnag-go - Automatic panic monitoring for golang, net/http and revel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270032 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270061] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-jWalterWeatherman - So you always leave a note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270061 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-jWalterWeatherman-0-0.1.git3d60171.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270032] Review Request: golang-github-bugsnag-bugsnag-go - Automatic panic monitoring for golang, net/http and revel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270032 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-bugsnag-bugsnag-go-1.0.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270063] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-cast - Safe and easy casting from one type to another in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270063 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-cast-0-0.1.git4d07383.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270063] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-cast - Safe and easy casting from one type to another in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300158] Review Request: python-editorconfig - A python based distribution of EditorConfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-editorconfig-0.12.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1309707] Review Request: testssl - Testing TLS/SSL encryption
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309707 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- testssl-2.6-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1309691] Review Request: hid-replay - debug tools for HID devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309691 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- hid-replay-0.7.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1258228] Review Request: nodejs-st - A module for serving static files. Does etags, caching, etc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258228 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-st-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1199820] Review Request: nodejs-yauzl - Yet another unzip library for node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1199820 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-yauzl-2.4.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270375] Review Request: nacl-arm-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270375 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-arm-newlib-2.1.0-3.git373135e.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1312561] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312561 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- gkrellm-2.3.6-0.1.rc1.git20160226.fc23, gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-20.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1312296] Review Request: 3dprinter-udev-rules - Rules for udev to give regular users access to operate 3D printers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312296 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- 3dprinter-udev-rules-0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300158] Review Request: python-editorconfig - A python based distribution of EditorConfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-editorconfig-0.12.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270375] Review Request: nacl-arm-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270375 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-arm-newlib-2.1.0-3.git373135e.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1312561] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312561 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- gkrellm-2.3.6-0.1.rc1.git20160226.fc22, gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-20.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270375] Review Request: nacl-arm-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270375 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-arm-newlib-2.1.0-3.git373135e.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1312561] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312561 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- gkrellm-2.3.6-0.1.rc1.git20160226.fc22, gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-20.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1288649] Review Request: cmark - cmark is the C reference implementation of CommonMark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288649 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1266429 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1266429] Review Request: cmark - CommonMark parsing and rendering
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1266429 --- Comment #36 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- *** Bug 1288649 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316189] Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189 --- Comment #2 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/fasd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1315910] Review Request: python-libarchive-c - Python interface to libarchive
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315910 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/python-libarchive-c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316189] Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Antonio Trande ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
(v2.0)". 18 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/FedoraReview/1316189-tlsh/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/python3.5/site-packages,
/usr/lib64/python3.5
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/python3.5/site-
packages, /usr/lib64/python3.5
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in tlsh-
devel , python2-tlsh , python3-tlsh , tlsh-debuginfo
[ ]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must
[Bug 1288737] Review Request: openmeeg - Low-frequency bio-electromagnetism solving forward problems in the field of EEG and MEG
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1288737 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(i.gnatenko.brain@ ||gmail.com) --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande --- This package failes on rawhide; please, take a look. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1295126] Review Request: python-guzzle_sphinx_theme - Sphinx theme used by Guzzle
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1295126 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fa...@locati.cc Flags||needinfo?(fa...@locati.cc) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282575] Review Request: pmix - Exascale version of PMI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282575 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2016-03-09 12:49:21 --- Comment #5 from Orion Poplawski --- Checked in an built. Thanks everyone. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1244538] Review Request: scikit-rf - Python library for RF/Microwave engineering.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244538 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kiarakovalev...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(kiarakovalevsky@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- Kiara, are you still interested to this review ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150441] Review Request: iv - NEURON graphical interface
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150441 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter Flags|fedora-review? | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1055837] Review Request: simbody - Multi-body Physics API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055837 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #10 from Antonio Trande --- Review stalled by time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1302809] Review Request: ne - ne, the nice editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302809 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Assignee|anto.tra...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande --- Submitter does not reply. Review stalled. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1294841] Review Request: fsvs - backup/restore/versioning/deployment tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294841 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(arlion@arlionproj ||ects.com) --- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande --- Still interested to this ticket ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1282080] Review Request: blackshades - First person shooter - protect the VIP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1282080 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(bk...@bkeys.org) --- Comment #4 from Antonio Trande --- Any news here ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316189] Review Request: tlsh - Fuzzy text matching library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316189 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316195] Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1316205 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316205 [Bug 1316205] shrinkwrap-1.2.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316175] Review Request: fasd - A command-line productivity booster
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316175
Jaroslav Škarvada changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jaroslav Škarvada ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* WTFPL", "WTFPL MIT/X11
(BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/var/tmp/y/x/1316175-fasd/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
Note: Found : Packager: Jaroslav Škarvada
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[!]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$
[Bug 1316195] Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1316199 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316199 [Bug 1316199] shrinkwrap-descriptors-2.0.0-alpha-8 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1300158] Review Request: python-editorconfig - A python based distribution of EditorConfig
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300158 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-editorconfig-0.12.0-3.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1312561] Review Request: gkrellm-sun - Sun clock plugin for GKrellM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312561 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gkrellm-2.3.6-0.1.rc1.git20160226.fc22, gkrellm-sun-1.0.0-20.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1270375] Review Request: nacl-arm-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270375 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-arm-newlib-2.1.0-3.git373135e.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316195] Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316195] New: Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 Bug ID: 1316195 Summary: Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/arquillian-core.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/arquillian-core-1.1.11-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM that substantially reduces the effort required to write and execute Java middle-ware integration and functional tests. No more mocks. No more container life-cycle and deployment hassles. Just real tests! Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1305669] Review Request: rubygem-benchmark-ips - An iterations per second enhancement to Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305669 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-benchmark-ips-2.5.0-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-6c3d911900 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316195] Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1316196 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196 [Bug 1316196] Review Request: shrinkwrap-resolver - ShrinkWrap Resolver -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316196] Review Request: shrinkwrap-resolver - ShrinkWrap Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1316195 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316195 [Bug 1316195] Review Request: arquillian-core - Arquillian is a revolutionary testing platform built on the JVM -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316196] Review Request: shrinkwrap-resolver - ShrinkWrap Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|shrinkwrap-resolver - |ShrinkWrap Resolver |ShrinkWrap Resolver -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1316196] New: Review Request: - ShrinkWrap Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316196 Bug ID: 1316196 Summary: Review Request: - ShrinkWrap Resolver Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: punto...@libero.it QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap-resolver.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/shrinkwrap-resolver-2.2.2-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: The ShrinkWrap Resolvers project provides a Java API to obtain artifacts from a repository system. This is handy to include third party libraries available in any Maven repository in your test archive. ShrinkWrap Resolvers additionally allows you to reuse all the configuration you've already specified in Maven build file, making packaging of an application archive much easier job. Fedora Account System Username: gil -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
[Bug 1305669] Review Request: rubygem-benchmark-ips - An iterations per second enhancement to Benchmark
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305669 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- rubygem-benchmark-ips-2.5.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fbb3d19a5c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/package-review
