[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654
Remi Collet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #10 from Remi Collet ---
[~]: %check is present and all tests pass.
OK with PHP 5.6.20
OK with PHP 7.0.6RC1
=> some failure during fedora-review
mays need to increase memory-limit (1G seems enough)
[~]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
May want to drop Conflicts
php-doctrine-cache < 1.4.1 don't have the autoloader so no issue
php-doctrine-cache >= 2 when exists will probably be php-doctrine-cache2
php-aws-php-sns-message-validator < 1 doesn't exists
php-aws-php-sns-message-validator >= 2 will probably be
php-aws-php-sns-message-validator2
See PHP-SIG discussion.
I have to run fedora-review against an altered spec file
-%{_bindir}/phpunit --verbose --bootstrap bootstrap.php
+%{_bindir}/phpunit -d memory_limit=1G --verbose --bootstrap bootstrap.php
But, as scratch build succeeds I won't consider this as a blocker.
Some comments but no blocker, as the package complies to the Packaging
Guidelines:
=== APPROVED ===
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 --- Comment #9 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1147846 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1147846&action=edit review.txt Generated by fedora-review 0.6.0 (3c5c9d7) last change: 2015-05-20 Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -r -n /dev/shm/extras/SRPMS/php-aws-sdk3-3.17.6-1.fc21.remi.src.rpm Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1147844 is|| obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1147845 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1147845&action=edit phpci.log phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB version 1.7.0 built Apr 12 2016 08:25:26 CEST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|fed...@famillecollet.com --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet --- Created attachment 1147844 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1147844&action=edit phpci.log phpCompatInfo version 5.0.0 DB version 1.7.0 built Apr 12 2016 08:25:26 CEST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 --- Comment #6 from Remi Collet --- Hmm... scratch build ok http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13679876 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 Remi Collet changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #5 from Remi Collet --- you may want to switch autoloader without @include_once. I have build failure during fedora-review. It seems "phpunit -d memory_limit=1G ..." works, can you please check ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1309782] Review Request: bugyou_plugins - Plugins and Services for Bugyou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782 --- Comment #43 from Fedora Update System --- bugyou_plugins-0.1.4-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-a4cda29200 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1309782] Review Request: bugyou_plugins - Plugins and Services for Bugyou
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309782 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 744416] Review Request: libisofs1 - Library to create ISO 9660 disk images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744416 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|herr...@owlriver.com|nonamed...@gmail.com Flags|needinfo?(herrold@owlriver. | |com)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 744416] Review Request: libisofs1 - Library to create ISO 9660 disk images
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=744416 Mukundan Ragavan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nonamed...@gmail.com --- Comment #6 from Mukundan Ragavan --- Invoking "Policy for stalled package reviews" [1] here and taking up the package for review. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974 William Moreno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #16 from William Moreno --- Package Review == Issues: === 1. Fedora review found: - gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in knode, knode-libs, ktimetracker See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Icon_Cache - All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. Note: These BR are not needed: sed See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 1474560 bytes in 48 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation - update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry. Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in knode, ktimetracker See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop- database 2. Directory ownerhip issues: [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/accessible, /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/kde4/apps/knode/pics(kdepim-common, knode), /usr/share/kde4/apps/libmessageviewer(kmail), /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/grantlee/0.5(kmail, grantlee), /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdepimwidgets(kdepim-common), /usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer/themes/example(kmail), /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/grantlee(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/kdepimwidgets/pics(kdepim-common), /usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer/themes/example_fancy(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/knode(kdepim-common, knode), /usr/share/kde4/apps/libkleopatra/pics(kleopatra-libs), /usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer/about(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/messageviewer/themes(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/libmessageviewer/pics(kmail), /usr/share/kde4/apps/libkleopatra(kleopatra-libs) 3. Should be better to exclude this file: knode.x86_64: W: gzipped-svg-icon /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/knode.svgz 4. This package ships many subpackages and I am currios about than there is not any devel subpackage. [!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. [!]: Development files must be in a -devel package Unversioned so-files knode: /usr/lib64/kde4/kcm_knode.so knode: /usr/lib64/kde4/knodepart.so knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/accessible/messagevieweraccessiblewidgetfactory.so knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/kdepimwidgets.so knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/mailcommonwidgets.so knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/pimcommonwidgets.so knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/grantlee/0.5/grantlee_messageheaderfilters.so ktimetracker: /usr/lib64/kde4/kcm_ktimetracker.so ktimetracker: /usr/lib64/kde4/ktimetrackerpart.so 5. Subpackages do not have a license text in the rpm. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [!]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. 6- Some of this files can be moved to a common subpackage? [!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 2181120 bytes in /usr/share 7. Upstream link to sources is not working: [!]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag Note: Could not download Source0: http://download.kde.org/stable/applications/4.14.10/src/kdepim-4.14.10.tar.xz See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Tags 8. There are a lot of these warnings: unused-direct-shlib-dependency = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file
[Bug 1277504] Review Request: apigen - PHP source code API generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- apigen-4.1.2-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fe09dec891 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321825] Review Request: python-units - Python support for quantities with units
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-units-0.06-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f0c42bf1c8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g |
|mail.com) |
--- Comment #3 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
1. kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: W: no-documentation
You can include MAINTAINER README.developers and TODO with %%docs
2. [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/qt5,
/usr/include/KF5, /usr/lib64/qt5/mkspecs, /usr/lib64/cmake,
/usr/lib64/qt5/mkspecs/modules
Also rpmlint shows:
kf5-kactivities-stats-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libKF5ActivitiesStats.so.5.21.0 /lib64/libm.so.6
kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: W: unused-direct-shlib-dependency
/usr/lib64/libKF5ActivitiesStats.so.5.21.0 /lib64/libgcc_s.so.1
3. [!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Source tarball hace a test directory than should be run in %check
4. Some rpmlint issues:
kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: W: summary-ended-with-dot C A KDE Frameworks 5
Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system.
kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: E: summary-too-long C A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3
library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system.
kf5-kactivities-stats.x86_64: E: description-line-too-long C A KDE Frameworks 5
Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities
system..
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: S
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c47ed33fdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1272527] Review Request: python-muranoclient - is a client library for Murano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272527 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- python-muranoclient-0.8.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-99777522b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324367] Review Request: libkml - Reference implementation of OGC KML 2.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- libkml-1.3.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-769b3cc6ff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326521] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client-0.4.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-556664b74f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1301063] Review Request: python-congressclient - OpenStack Congress client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- python-congressclient-1.2.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6abd5312a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327784] New: Review Request: nauty - Graph canonical labeling and automorphism group computation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327784 Bug ID: 1327784 Summary: Review Request: nauty - Graph canonical labeling and automorphism group computation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/nauty/nauty.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/nauty/nauty-2.6.4-1.fc25.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: jjames Description: Nauty and Traces are programs for computing automorphism groups of graphs and digraphs. (At present, Traces does not accept digraphs.) They can also produce a canonical label. They are written in a portable subset of C, and run on a considerable number of different systems. There is a small suite of programs called gtools included in the package. For example, geng can generate non-isomorphic graphs very quickly. There are also generators for bipartite graphs, digraphs, and multigraphs, and programs for manipulating files of graphs in a compact format. The Fedora package was modeled on the Debian package in hopes that cross-distro compatibility might help consumers of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297347] Review Request: java-comment-preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297347 --- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo --- Both, because using as BRs maven-local(*) is already available as Rs (are automatically generated by JP-Ts) Requires: jpackage-utils Requires: java-headless >= 1:1.8 and BRs BuildRequires: java-devel >= 1:1.8 BuildRequires: jpackage-utils (*) (*) sub package of javapackages-tools (**) alias of javapackages-tools Sorry for the noise -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326170] Review Request: php-aws-php-sns-message-validator - Amazon SNS message validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- php-aws-php-sns-message-validator-1.1.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25a5f3c38d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326170] Review Request: php-aws-php-sns-message-validator - Amazon SNS message validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326170] Review Request: php-aws-php-sns-message-validator - Amazon SNS message validation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326170 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-aws-php-sns-message-validator-1.1.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-922e255b00 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] New: Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 Bug ID: 1327781 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-olivere-elastic/golang-github-olivere-elastic.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-olivere-elastic/golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc20.src.rpm Description: Elasticsearch client for Go Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13675451 $ rpmlint golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc20.src.rpm golang-github-olivere-elastic-devel-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc20.noarch.rpm golang-github-olivere-elastic-unit-test-devel-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc20.x86_64.rpm golang-github-olivere-elastic.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elasticsearch -> Elastic search, Elastic-search, Elastically golang-github-olivere-elastic.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Elasticsearch -> Elastic search, Elastic-search, Elastically golang-github-olivere-elastic-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Elasticsearch -> Elastic search, Elastic-search, Elastically golang-github-olivere-elastic-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Elasticsearch -> Elastic search, Elastic-search, Elastically golang-github-olivere-elastic-devel.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gopkg -> go pkg, go-pkg, GOP golang-github-olivere-elastic-unit-test-devel.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US gopkg -> go pkg, go-pkg, GOP 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1300981] Review Request: python-django-rest-framework-braces - Utilities for working with Django-Rest-Framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:36:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318358] Review Request: copr-dist-git - Copr services for Dist Git server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- copr-dist-git-0.15-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318358] Review Request: copr-dist-git - Copr services for Dist Git server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:36:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1300981] Review Request: python-django-rest-framework-braces - Utilities for working with Django-Rest-Framework.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1300981 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-django-rest-framework-braces-0.1.6-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327753] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy - A proxy to simulate network and system conditions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327753 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 --- Comment #2 from Jan Chaloupka --- Tests depends on bz#1327753 which is on review as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324988] Review Request: python-lasagne - Lightweight library to build and train neural networks in Theano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- python-lasagne-0.1-3.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270405] Review Request: native_client - Google Native Client Toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405 Bug 1270405 depends on bug 1270357, which changed state. Bug 1270357 Summary: Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270322] Review Request: chromium - A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322 Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270357, which changed state. Bug 1270357 Summary: Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270357] Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:33:38 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270322] Review Request: chromium - A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322 Bug 1270322 depends on bug 1270358, which changed state. Bug 1270358 Summary: Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324988] Review Request: python-lasagne - Lightweight library to build and train neural networks in Theano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324988 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:34:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321438] Review Request: python-breathe - Doxygen xml output to reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438 --- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System --- python-breathe-4.2.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321438] Review Request: python-breathe - Doxygen xml output to reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:34:09 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270405] Review Request: native_client - Google Native Client Toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405 Bug 1270405 depends on bug 1270358, which changed state. Bug 1270358 Summary: Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270358] Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358 Bug 1270358 depends on bug 1270357, which changed state. Bug 1270357 Summary: Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327526] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-crc32 - CRC32 hash with x64 optimizations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1327762 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 [Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270358] Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-04-15 17:33:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1327762 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 [Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270357] Review Request: nacl-gcc - Various compilers (C, C++) for nacl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270357 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc24, nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1221781] Review Request: zipios - C++ library for reading and writing Zip files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2015-10-08 04:33:31 |2016-04-15 17:33:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1221781] Review Request: zipios - C++ library for reading and writing Zip files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221781 --- Comment #54 from Fedora Update System --- zipios-2.1.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270358] Review Request: nacl-newlib - C library intended for use on embedded systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270358 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- nacl-gcc-4.4.3-18.20150504gitf80d6b9.fc24, nacl-newlib-2.1.0-9.20150528git8c4da47.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327254] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-queue - Fast golang queue using ring-buffer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327254 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1327762 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 [Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327762] Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1327307, 1327254, 1327526 --- Comment #1 from Jan Chaloupka --- Info: no Koji build as the package depends on bz#1327307, bz#1327254 and bz#1327526 which are currently on review. Locally, it builds fine. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327254 [Bug 1327254] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-queue - Fast golang queue using ring-buffer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 [Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526 [Bug 1327526] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-crc32 - CRC32 hash with x64 optimizations -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327762] New: Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327762 Bug ID: 1327762 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-sarama - Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-Shopify-sarama/golang-github-Shopify-sarama.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-Shopify-sarama/golang-github-Shopify-sarama-1.7.0-0.1.git87ec8d7.fc20.src.rpm Description: Sarama is a Go library for Apache Kafka 0.8 and 0.9 Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup $ rpmlint golang-github-Shopify-sarama-1.7.0-0.1.git87ec8d7.fc20.src.rpm golang-github-Shopify-sarama-devel-1.7.0-0.1.git87ec8d7.fc20.noarch.rpm golang-github-Shopify-sarama-unit-test-devel-1.7.0-0.1.git87ec8d7.fc20.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327534] Review Request: golang-github-jmespath-go-jmespath - Golang implementation of JMESPath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327534 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297347] Review Request: java-comment-preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297347 --- Comment #8 from Pavel Kajaba --- https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pkajaba/public_git/java-comment-preprocessor.git/tree/java-comment-preprocessor.spec Here is the most current version. Which ones are unneded now? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327526] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-crc32 - CRC32 hash with x64 optimizations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526 Jan Chaloupka changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327753] New: Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy - A proxy to simulate network and system conditions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327753 Bug ID: 1327753 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy - A proxy to simulate network and system conditions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jchal...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy/golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy.spec SRPM URL: https://jchaloup.fedorapeople.org/reviews/golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy/golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.gitfc5a9c0.fc20.src.rpm Description: A proxy to simulate network and system conditions Fedora Account System Username: jchaloup Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13674605 $ rpmlint golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.gitfc5a9c0.fc20.src.rpm golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy-devel-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.gitfc5a9c0.fc20.noarch.rpm golang-github-Shopify-toxiproxy-unit-test-devel-2.0.0-0.1.rc2.gitfc5a9c0.fc20.x86_64.rpm 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327497] Review Request: golang-github-go-ini-ini - Package ini provides INI file read and write functionality in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge --- Aha, that explains it. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974 --- Comment #15 from Rex Dieter --- and FYI, reference to Copr I made for initial testing: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rdieter/kdepim4/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1306353] Review Request: libunity - Library for integrating with Unity and Plasma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306353 --- Comment #8 from Rex Dieter --- Fyi, Copr for initial testing: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/rdieter/libunity/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #2 from Rex Dieter --- reviewer ping. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g ||mail.com) --- Comment #14 from Rex Dieter --- reviewer ping :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 --- Comment #19 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com --- (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #12) > 6) As this package is licensed by multiple licenses, so add comment in spec > file as required. Not sure what you mean here? The spec file has the GPL and BSD license text in the comments at the beginning. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297347] Review Request: java-comment-preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297347 --- Comment #7 from gil cattaneo --- ... and also BuildRequires:jpackage-utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297347] Review Request: java-comment-preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297347 --- Comment #6 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Pavel Kajaba from comment #5) > Thanks for additional review! I have removed redundant dependencies, > dangerous dependencies and also removed useless lines. > > Spec URL: https://pkajaba.fedorapeople.org/java-comment-preprocessor.spec > SRPM URL: > https://pkajaba.fedorapeople.org/java-comment-preprocessor-6.0.1-2.fc23.src. > rpm > > There is diff of changes: > https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pkajaba/public_git/java-comment-preprocessor. > git/commit/?id=30394edc5fbcead1da4b79cd84ae74e50d0b1204 Thanks for your work See https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pkajaba/public_git/java-comment-preprocessor.git/tree/java-comment-preprocessor.spec?id=30394edc5fbcead1da4b79cd84ae74e50d0b1204#n21 please remove unneeded Requires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr ||o...@intel.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297347] Review Request: java-comment-preprocessor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297347 --- Comment #5 from Pavel Kajaba --- Thanks for additional review! I have removed redundant dependencies, dangerous dependencies and also removed useless lines. Spec URL: https://pkajaba.fedorapeople.org/java-comment-preprocessor.spec SRPM URL: https://pkajaba.fedorapeople.org/java-comment-preprocessor-6.0.1-2.fc23.src.rpm There is diff of changes: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/pkajaba/public_git/java-comment-preprocessor.git/commit/?id=30394edc5fbcead1da4b79cd84ae74e50d0b1204 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 --- Comment #18 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com --- So I'm asking is it a hard requirement to use the newer package? If so, why? is there a specific problem with the older version (which would be good to know for other reasons), or is a general policy that the latest/greatest is required for Fedora packages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 --- Comment #17 from Neil Horman --- Its a BuildRequires. If someone is building the rpm they can adhere to the levels Fedora requires. If they aren't using fedora, then they can modify the spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dennis.dalessandr | |o...@intel.com)| --- Comment #16 from dennis.dalessan...@intel.com --- (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #12) > 3) BuildRequires: libibverbs-devel >= 1.2.0 > We had update libibverbs to latest upstream v1.2.0 for Fedora. Do we really need to update this? There still may be systems that want to build this RPM but have not upgraded to 1.2.0, not sure how we would handle that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327497] Review Request: golang-github-go-ini-ini - Package ini provides INI file read and write functionality in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497 --- Comment #4 from Jan Chaloupka --- Building locally? Install latest rpms for golang-github-smartystreets-assertions [1] and golang-github-smartystreets-goconvey [2] [1] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=754528 [2] http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=754610 They are currently override in buildroot. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1272527] Review Request: python-muranoclient - is a client library for Murano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272527 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-muranoclient-0.8.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-99777522b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1272527] Review Request: python-muranoclient - is a client library for Murano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272527 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1301063] Review Request: python-congressclient - OpenStack Congress client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1301063] Review Request: python-congressclient - OpenStack Congress client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-congressclient-1.2.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d6abd5312a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327497] Review Request: golang-github-go-ini-ini - Package ini provides INI file read and write functionality in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge --- Tests seem to be a bit unstable: + go test -compiler gc -ldflags '' github.com/go-ini/ini # github.com/go-ini/ini ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:666: undefined: ShouldHaveLength ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:673: undefined: ShouldHaveLength ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:680: undefined: ShouldHaveLength ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:687: undefined: ShouldHaveLength ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:694: undefined: ShouldHaveLength ../../BUILDROOT/golang-github-go-ini-ini-1.9.0-0.1.git193d1ec.fc25.x86_64/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/go-ini/ini/ini_test.go:701: undefined: ShouldHaveLength It failed for me in mock, and on copr, but succeeded on koji scratchbuilds :/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1272527] Review Request: python-muranoclient - is a client library for Murano
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272527 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #15 from Marcos --- Hi, python-muranoclient was successfully pushed to master, f24 and epel7 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-muranoclient.git/ Koji builds for rawhide (master) and f24 worked fine. For epel7 it failed due to: "Error: No Package found for python-oslo-sphinx >= 2.3.0" More info here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13671457 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321455] Review Request: knot-resolver - Caching full DNS Resolver
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321455
Tomas Hozza changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
|needinfo?(tho...@redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Hozza ---
(In reply to Jan Včelák from comment #2)
> Thank you. Updated.
>
> Spec URL:
> https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/knot-resolver/1.0.0-0.2.79a8440/knot-
> resolver.spec
> SRPM URL:
> https://jvcelak.fedorapeople.org/review/knot-resolver/1.0.0-0.2.79a8440/knot-
> resolver-1.0.0-0.2.79a8440.fc23.src.rpm
>
>
> (In reply to Tomas Hozza from comment #1)
> > - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> > Note: warning: File listed twice: /var/lib/kresd/root.keys
> > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles
>
> Fixed.
>
> > - Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
> > files.
>
> Fixed.
>
> > - Files outside of /usr SHOULD be owned by root:root
> > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#File_Permissions)
>
> I've changed UID to root where possible. And kept GID to kresd where
> necessary. Files inside /var/lib are state information and have to be
> writable by the daemon.
>
> > - Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
> > Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in knot-
> > resolver-devel
>
> Fixed.
>
> > - Once you resolve issues with building the documentation, please package is
> > as well, because currently there is no man page for the daemon.
>
> The documentation building can't be fixed easily. The RTD theme cannot be
> loaded by Python 2 Sphinx on Fedora, and Breathe is incompatible with Python
> 3.
>
> I've updated the package to current git master because some of the building
> issues were resolved. The manual page is now installed. And unit tests
> results are temporarily ignored (one failure is present and should be fixed
> in the gold release).
Thank you for resolving the issues.
The package is APPROVED for Fedora.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #16 from paul.j.re...@intel.com --- (In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #12) > Sure, go ahead and post the spec here. I have posted the template for the spec file to this problem report. Note that this template for the spec file is in two active reviews. One review, is internal here at Intel. The other is in this problem report. I will try to propagate comments back and forth to keep all parties informed of all comments. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #15 from paul.j.re...@intel.com --- Created attachment 1147688 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1147688&action=edit Template for specfile This is the template for the spec file that we use to generate the hfi1-psm.spec file. We use sed to set various entities in the template that changes such as @VERSION@ and @RELEASE@. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #14 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Another comment, on comment 2:
>> %if 0%{?rhel}%{?rhl}%{?fedora}
>> Requires: libuuid
>> %else
>> Requires: libuuid1
>> %endif
>
> The binary package will automatically get a dependency on
> "libuuid.so.1()(64bit)", so there is no need for an explicit Requires.
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Explicit_Requires
Do you know if SUSE will automatically get the dependency on libuuid?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #13 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Regarding comment 2, I received some serious pushback from a member of my team
here at Intel regarding this comment:
> Source0: %{name}-%{version}-%{release}.tar.gz
>
> Could you please use a full URL in the Source tag?
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:SourceURL
I need to know if this _needs_ to be changed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 988667] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|NotReady| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 988667] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667
--- Comment #29 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
I added your account the right group, you should have access to
fedorapeople.org in case you need it in the future
[https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/fedorapeople.org].
> so if a user has a (maybe manually) installed version of Vala-0.20, then a
> new file will be created during the build,
You could just remove those files at the end of %install:
find %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/valadoc/drivers/ -type f \! -path *%{version}*
-delete
Some issues from before which still aren't fixed:
(In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #19)
> Again, some general advice:
>
> . You must use '%license COPYING', remove '%doc COPYING' instead.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> . There's no license for the sub packages (devel & data), make them
> 'Require: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}'.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> LicensingGuidelines#Subpackage_Licensing
> . I guess you want also add 'Require: %{name}-data%{?_isa} =
> %{version}-%{release}' into main package, or data could be merged completely
> into main, why another sub package? At least, add 'BuildArch: noarch' into
> data subpackage.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:
> Guidelines#Noarch_with_unported_dependencies
> . Remove 'Group: Development/Tools', it's deprecated.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
> How_to_create_an_RPM_package#SPEC_file_overview
> . You must provide a proper %changelog with at least some intial entry.
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Changelogs
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1272530] Review Request: python-mistralclient - python client for Mistral REST API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272530
Haïkel Guémar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(asteroid566@gmail |fedora-review+
|.com) |
|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |
|com)|
--- Comment #7 from Haïkel Guémar ---
I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection, please submit
SCM requestx
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
(v2.0)". 16 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/haikel/1272530-python-
mistralclient/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
python2-mistralclient , python-mistralclient-doc
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from
[Bug 1327635] Review Request: openstack-congress - OpenStack Congress Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327635 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #1 from Marcos --- There is not successful scratch because python-olso-config version. See here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13670962 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327635] New: Review Request: openstack-congress - OpenStack Congress Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327635 Bug ID: 1327635 Summary: Review Request: openstack-congress - OpenStack Congress Service Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: marcos.fermin.l...@cern.ch QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://mferminl.web.cern.ch/mferminl/fedorapkg/openstack-congress/3.0.0/openstack-congress.spec SRPM URL: http://mferminl.web.cern.ch/mferminl/fedorapkg/openstack-congress/3.0.0/openstack-congress-3.0.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: OpenStack Congress Service is an open policy framework for OpenStack Fedora Account System Username:mflobo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327635] Review Request: openstack-congress - OpenStack Congress Service
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327635 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326521] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client-0.4.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4c43492ba8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326521] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client-0.4.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-556664b74f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326521] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-client - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326521 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc22 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 22. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d127f0584e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-256d1faef2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c47ed33fdf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0887b8cdff -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1302904] Review Request: cacti - re-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302904 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- OK, looks good. Package is RE-(APPROVED). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1301063] Review Request: python-congressclient - OpenStack Congress client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1301063 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) --- Comment #13 from Marcos --- Hi, python-congressclient was successfully pushed to master, f24 and epel7 http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-congressclient.git/ Koji builds for rawhide (master) and f24 worked fine. For epel7 it failed due to: "Error: No Package found for python-oslo-sphinx >= 2.3.0" More info here http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13670964 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1302904] Review Request: cacti - re-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1302904 --- Comment #9 from Morten Stevens --- Okay, please check the latest changes: Updated SRPM: https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/cacti/cacti-0.8.8g-1.el7.src.rpm Updated SPEC: https://mstevens.fedorapeople.org/cacti/cacti.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318988] Review Request: java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32 - OpenJDK AArch32 porting project preview release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318988 --- Comment #25 from jiri vanek --- ok. Upstream provided another tag: https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32-jit/6/java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32-1.8.0.76-1.160415.fc24.src.rpm https://jvanek.fedorapeople.org/java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32-jit/6/java-1.8.0-openjdk-aarch32.spec looks mutch better: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13670361 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
