[Bug 1327526] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-crc32 - CRC32 hash with x64 optimizations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327526
Matthias Runge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Matthias Runge ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 7 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/mrunge/review/1327526-golang-github-klauspost-
crc32/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang-
github-klauspost-crc32-devel , golang-github-klauspost-crc32-unit-
test-devel
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files
[Bug 1326169] Review Request: php-league-climate - Allows you to easily output colored text, special formats, and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326169 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-league-climate-3.2.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d127f0584e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324367] Review Request: libkml - Reference implementation of OGC KML 2.2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324367 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- libkml-1.3.0-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-37e9302a4c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1277504] Review Request: apigen - PHP source code API generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277504 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- apigen-4.1.2-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-bab63f328a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1268716] Review Request: cjdns - IP6 VPN with crypto address allocation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1268716 --- Comment #73 from Fedora Update System --- cjdns-17.3-11.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1318358] Review Request: copr-dist-git - Copr services for Dist Git server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318358 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- copr-dist-git-0.15-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1319451] Review Request: mbassador - a light-weight and high-performance message (event) bus implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319451 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- mbassador-1.2.4.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1322168] Review Request: ibacm - InfiniBand Communication Manager Assistant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1322168 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- ibacm-1.2.0-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321438] Review Request: python-breathe - Doxygen xml output to reStructuredText
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321438 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System --- python-breathe-4.2.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1325414] Review Request: pag - Commandline interaction with pagure.io
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325414 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- pag-0.4-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1306972] Review Request: php-mock-phpunit - Mock built-in PHP functions with PHPUnit.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1306972 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- php-mock-phpunit-1.1.1-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1328968] Review Request: capnproto - A data interchange format and capability-based RPC system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- @Andy: I chose to name it capnproto for consistency with other distros that have it packaged, namely Debian[0] and Ubuntu[1], and the upstream project itself is named as such, even though the tarball is still capnproto-c++. The README.txt file is in the tarball, but it merely provides instructions on how to build it from source, which is generally not useful for a pre-built package, so I elected to not include it. [0]: https://packages.debian.org/sid/capnproto [1]: http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/capnproto -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329448] Review Request: Tbootxm - trusted host with boot time integrity checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329448 Janet Morgan changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1273605 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329448] Review Request: Tbootxm - trusted host with boot time integrity checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329448 Saurabh Kulkarni changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://github.com/OpenAtte ||station/OpenAttestation/tre ||e/tboot-xm_v1.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329448] Review Request: Tbootxm - trusted host with boot time integrity checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329448 Saurabh Kulkarni changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329448] New: Review Request: Tbootxm - trusted host with boot time integrity checks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329448 Bug ID: 1329448 Summary: Review Request: Tbootxm - trusted host with boot time integrity checks Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: saurabh.kulka...@intel.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: SRPM URL: Description: This feature will enable measuring files present on the OS at the time of boot. These measurements will extend upon those done by Intel TXT and Tboot earlier in the boot process. In addition to measuring these paths, it would be possible to attest (locally or remotely) these measurements against a good known whitelist to provide boot time integrity. Measurements constitute file hashes. We can potentially measure any file having a path on the OS at the time of boot and store those measurements in the TPM. These values are compared against a known whitelist to guarantee boot time integrity of OS components. In order to remotely attest these measurements, the user would need an Attestation server and a host trust agent installed (open-sourced already). For measurements without remote attestation, no other component is required. Please note : All measurements are done by an initrd hook. Existing initrd will be modified to add our measurement agent hook for this to work. Fedora Account System Username: srk892 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329441] Review Request: erlang-esip - ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329441 --- Comment #1 from Randy Barlow --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13753421 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329441] Review Request: erlang-esip - ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329441 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1312517 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1312517 [Bug 1312517] ejabberd-16.03 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329441] New: Review Request: erlang-esip - ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329441 Bug ID: 1329441 Summary: Review Request: erlang-esip - ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rbar...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-esip.spec SRPM URL: https://rbarlow.fedorapeople.org/erlang-esip-1.0.2-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: ProcessOne SIP server component in Erlang. Fedora Account System Username: rbarlow This is a rename of the erlang-p1_sip package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329424] Review Request: gimp-save-for-web - Save for web plug-in for GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424 --- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga --- Koji scratch result: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13752240 rpmlint result: $ rpmlint rpmbuild/SRPMS/gimp-save-for-web-0.29.3-1.fc24.src.rpm gimp-save-for-web.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US resizing -> residing, re sizing, re-sizing 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329424] New: Review Request: gimp-save-for-web - Save for web plug-in for GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424 Bug ID: 1329424 Summary: Review Request: gimp-save-for-web - Save for web plug-in for GIMP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: l...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/gimp-save-for-web.spec SRPM URL: https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/gimp-save-for-web-0.29.3-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Save for Web allows to find compromise between minimal file size and acceptable quality of image quickly. While adjusting various settings, you may explore how image quality and file size change. Options to reduce file size of an image include setting compression quality, number or colors, resizing, cropping, Exif information removal, etc. Fedora Account System Username: luya -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297549] Review Request: golang-github-go-ini-ini - Provides INI file read and write functionality in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297549 --- Comment #2 from Ed Marshall --- Perfectly happy to punt to someone else; almost all of the reviews I have in flight right now are in service to getting Hashicorp Vault packaged, so if someone else already has this one in hand, that works out great. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1264654] Review Request: php-aws-sdk3 - Amazon Web Services framework for PHP (3.x)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264654 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-aws-sdk3-3.18.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0973a7185f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1316982] Review Request: python-pytest-testmon - A py.test plug-in which executes only tests affected by recent changes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316982 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pytest-testmon-0.8.2-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c164e0f3b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1305996] Review Request: python-pyuv - A Python module which provides an interface to libuv
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305996
--- Comment #12 from William Moreno ---
Package Review
==
1.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
There is a complete libuv bundled in pyuv-1.2.0/deps/libuv/
2.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
Most of the time with python packages try to get some pkgs from pypi in check
there are missing build requires (and maybe missing requires) please doble
check if dowloaded packages are already in Fedora repos, if so, include then as
buildrequires, if not you must package then firt.
3.
There is a doc directory than you can compile to html with python-sphinx and
include in a doc subpackage.
4.
Can these files go to a -devel supackage.
Unversioned so-files
python2-pyuv: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/pyuv/_cpyuv.so
python3-pyuv: /usr/lib64/python3.4/site-packages/pyuv/_cpyuv.cpython-34m.so
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bi
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974 --- Comment #22 from Rex Dieter --- Thanks for the thorough reviews! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974 William Moreno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #21 from William Moreno --- I am fine with this packaging. Aproved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832 William Moreno changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ |needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g | |mail.com) | --- Comment #7 from William Moreno --- Looks good for me. Aproved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1209054] Review Request: pyqso - logging tool for radio amateurs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209054 Iain R. Learmonth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(i...@fsfe.org) | Last Closed||2016-04-21 14:56:37 --- Comment #7 from Iain R. Learmonth --- It's apparent to me that I do not have the time available to maintain this package in Fedora. Closing the bug and withdrawing the review request. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1328968] Review Request: capnproto - A data interchange format and capability-based RPC system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968 --- Comment #3 from Andy Lutomirski --- This looks generally sensible. Before I go run fedora-review on it and check all the boxes, why did you choose to name it capnproto instead of capnproto-c++? Also, shouldn't README.txt be packaged, or was that removed upstream? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297491] Review Request: python2-multilib - A module for determining if a package is multilib or not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491
--- Comment #10 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ---
Requires on python2 and python3 are not needed. (A dependency on python(abi) =
X.Y is added automatically.)
Why are the tests in %check disabled? If possible, enable them, and if not,
please add a comment (in the spec file) explaining why.
To make things a bit simpler to edit in the future, you can:
- replace second and third Summary lines with:
Summary: %{summary}
- define a macro for the descriptions:
%global _description \
A Python module that supports several multilib "methods" useful for determining
\
if a 32-bit package should be included with its 64-bit analogue in a compose.
%description %_description
%description -n python2-multilib %_description
%description -n python3-multilib %_description
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g
||mail.com)
--- Comment #20 from Rex Dieter ---
1. update-desktop-desktop is invoked:
...
%posttrans -n knode
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_kde4_iconsdir}/hicolor &> /dev/null ||:
update-desktop-database -q &> /dev/null ||:
%postun -n knode
if [ $1 -eq 0 ] ; then
gtk-update-icon-cache %{_kde4_iconsdir}/hicolor &> /dev/null ||:
update-desktop-database -q &> /dev/null ||:
fi
2. - Can move those files to a devel subpackage?
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
No, they are all runtime plugins.
3. - Current packagin guidelines recomends to include a appdata.xml
Yeah, upstream doesn't provide one, I could work on one eventually, but this
shouldn't be a blocker either
Is there anything else I may have missed?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1040243] Review Request: capnproto - A data interchange format and capability-based RPC system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1040243 Andy Lutomirski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2016-04-21 13:10:54 --- Comment #9 from Andy Lutomirski --- Superseded by #1328968 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1328968 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1328968] Review Request: capnproto - A data interchange format and capability-based RPC system
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328968 --- Comment #2 from Andy Lutomirski --- *** Bug 1040243 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329340] Review Request: python-cradox - Python libraries for the Ceph librados library with use cython instead of ctypes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1329341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329341 [Bug 1329341] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Newton packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1329341 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329341 [Bug 1329341] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Newton packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590 --- Comment #33 from paul.j.re...@intel.com --- Created attachment 1149513 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149513&action=edit Tar ball of source for psm library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
paul.j.re...@intel.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment|0 |1
#1148717 is||
obsolete||
--- Comment #32 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
Created attachment 1149512
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1149512&action=edit
Spec file for 10.1.0.
This is the spec file that includes %{?dist} in the Release: tag.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324590] Review Request: hfi1-psm - Intel PSM Libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324590
--- Comment #31 from paul.j.re...@intel.com ---
I have put %{?dist} into the Release: tag, together with a number of other
fixes. Further, I will reserve the use of the Release tag to distros. I will
place the information I need entirely in the Version: tag. As such, I have
changed that version to 10.1.0. But, that version is subject to change as the
code is not quite ready to be released.
I will push the new version of the spec file for your review.
Can you please re-review my spec file, and make further comments?
Or, if you want, we can abandon this review, as Doug suggests, and just review
a tar ball. I will post that too.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329340] New: Review Request: python-cradox - Python libraries for the Ceph librados library with use cython instead of ctypes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329340 Bug ID: 1329340 Summary: Review Request: python-cradox - Python libraries for the Ceph librados library with use cython instead of ctypes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jp...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-cradox/python-cradox.spec SRPM URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-cradox/python-cradox-1.1.8-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Python libraries for the Ceph librados library with use cython instead of ctypes Fedora Account System Username: jpena Koji scratch build available at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=13748408 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974
William Moreno changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(williamjmorenor@g |
|mail.com) |
--- Comment #19 from William Moreno ---
Issues:
===
- update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in knode, ktimetracker
See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
database
- Can move those files to a devel subpackage?
[!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Unversioned so-files
knode: /usr/lib64/kde4/kcm_knode.so
knode: /usr/lib64/kde4/knodepart.so
knode-libs:
/usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/accessible/messagevieweraccessiblewidgetfactory.so
knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/kdepimwidgets.so
knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/mailcommonwidgets.so
knode-libs: /usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/designer/pimcommonwidgets.so
knode-libs:
/usr/lib64/kde4/plugins/grantlee/0.5/grantlee_messageheaderfilters.so
ktimetracker: /usr/lib64/kde4/kcm_ktimetracker.so
ktimetracker: /usr/lib64/kde4/ktimetrackerpart.so
- Current packagin guidelines recomends to include a appdata.xml fiel fro
grafical interface
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
= EXTRA items =
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
---
Checking: knode-4.14.10-23.fc23.x86_64.rpm
knode-libs-4.14.10-23.fc23.x86_64.rpm
ktimetracker-4.14.10-23.fc23.x86_64.rpm
kdepim4-debuginfo-4.14.10-23.fc23.x86_64.rpm
kdepim4-4.14.10-23.fc23.src.rpm
knode.x86_64: W: gzipped-svg-icon
/usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps/knode.svgz
knode.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary knode
knode-libs.x86_64: W: shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libmailcommon.so.4.14.18
exit@GLIBC_2.2.5
knode-libs.x86_64: W: no-documentation
knode-libs.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary kincidenceeditor
ktimetracker.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary ktimetracker
ktimetracker.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary karm
kdepim4.src:53: W: macro-in-comment %{version}
kdepim4.src:53: W: macro-in-comment %{release}
kdepim4.src:54: W: macro-i
[Bug 1326301] Review Request: intel-cmt-cat - Software providing access to Intel (R) RDT technologies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326301 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/intel-cmt-cat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327050] Review Request: can-utils - SocketCAN userspace utilities and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/can-utils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297491] Review Request: python2-multilib - A module for determining if a package is multilib or not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297491 --- Comment #9 from Jay Greguske --- Thanks for your help. Does this look better? https://people.redhat.com/jgregusk/not-piracy/srpms/python-multilib.spec https://people.redhat.com/jgregusk/not-piracy/srpms/python-multilib-1.1-3.fc23.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1319519] Review Request: plymouth-theme-breeze - Plymouth Breeze theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319519 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2016-04-21 09:38:42 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1319520] Review Request: grub2-breeze-theme - Breeze theme for GRUB2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319520 Rex Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2016-04-21 09:43:10 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- imported -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 --- Comment #3 from Tomas Repik --- Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/primitive-java/v1/primitive.spec SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/primitive-java/v1/primitive-1.2.2-2.fc23.src.rpm * Thu Apr 21 2016 Tomas Repik - 1.2.2-2 - new patch for license headers -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1287201] Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201 --- Comment #5 from Rex Dieter --- scm request submitted -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|punto...@libero.it Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 --- Comment #2 from gil cattaneo --- can you take these for me? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328062 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328063 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- Please, use: https://github.com/mintern-java/primitive/commit/cbe3d5d5a1792d0e325e948f7a765cae7ff8e2e7.patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327078] Review Request: python-pyrtlsdr - Python binding for librtlsdr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327078 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188 Krzysztof Czurylo changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |x86_64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188 Krzysztof Czurylo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dan.j.willi...@intel.com --- Comment #1 from Krzysztof Czurylo --- This is the first package submission - need a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1329201 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 [Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1324020, 652183 ||(FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 [Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329201] New: Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329201 Bug ID: 1329201 Summary: Review Request: primitive - Utility methods for Java's primitive types Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tre...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/cassandra/primitive.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/cassandra/primitive-1.2.2-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Primitive provides utility methods for functionality related to primitive types. Currently, the only functionality is the ability to sort primitive arrays using custom comparators. Packaging as a build-requirement for cassandra. Fedora Account System Username: trepik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329199] Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329199 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1324020, 652183 ||(FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 [Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1329199 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329199 [Bug 1329199] Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329199] New: Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329199 Bug ID: 1329199 Summary: Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tre...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/concurrent-trees/v1/concurrent-trees.spec SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/concurrent-trees/v1/concurrent-trees-2.5.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: This library provides concurrent Radix Trees and concurrent Suffix Trees for Java. Packaging as a build-requirement for cassandra. Fedora Account System Username:trepik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 Neil Horman changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(robert.amato@inte ||l.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327078] Review Request: python-pyrtlsdr - Python binding for librtlsdr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327078 Jan Synacek changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Jan Synacek --- Looks ok now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329188] New: Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188 Bug ID: 1329188 Summary: Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: krzysztof.czur...@intel.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/pmem/nvml/releases/download/1.0/nvml.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/pmem/nvml/releases/download/1.0/nvml-1.0-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: The NVM Library is a collection of libraries for using memory-mapped persistence, optimized specifically for persistent memory. Fedora Account System Username: krzycz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Alan Pevec changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ape...@redhat.com, ||karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. ||com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 --- Comment #2 from Alan Pevec --- Is this required by any of clients or is it only service dependency? If the latter, then we don't really need it in Fedora, only in RDO. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jp...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jp...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Javier Peña --- Hi Haïkel, I have found a few issues: - We have "BuildRequires: python3-oslotest" in the python2 subpackage section. - Tests subpackages should require their corresponding main subpackage - The source requirements.txt file requires enum34 for Python 2.7, but it's not in the package Requires. Is that on purpose? Everything else looks ok to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 --- Comment #11 from robert.am...@intel.com --- (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #10) > Please fix those issues pointed out by Neil. Will do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 --- Comment #10 from Honggang LI --- Please fix those issues pointed out by Neil. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186 robert.am...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte | |l.com) | |needinfo?(robert.amato@inte | |l.com) | --- Comment #9 from robert.am...@intel.com --- (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #8) > Hi Robert > Ping? Any update? thanks Honli, We will use the name opa-fmgui as you suggest. I should have a revised package by COB Friday (4/22). Robert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327078] Review Request: python-pyrtlsdr - Python binding for librtlsdr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327078 --- Comment #5 from Jaroslav Škarvada --- New version: Spec URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrtlsdr/python-pyrtlsdr.spec SRPM URL: https://jskarvad.fedorapeople.org/python-pyrtlsdr/python-pyrtlsdr-0.2.2-3.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] Review Request: python-oslo-privsep - OpenStack library for privilege separation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: -|OpenStack library for ||privilege separation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329125] New: Review Request: -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329125 Bug ID: 1329125 Summary: Review Request: - Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: karlthe...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep.spec SRPM URL: https://hguemar.fedorapeople.org/reviews/python-oslo-privsep-1.5.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: OpenStack library for privilege separation Fedora Account System Username: hguemar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 988667] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667 --- Comment #35 from Gergely Polonkai --- Thank you, I’m aware of that and already working on it! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1283327] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme - Extension to Sphinx for documenting APIs built with Pecan and WSME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327 --- Comment #10 from Javier Peña --- (In reply to Marcos from comment #9) > I see this package was approved, I can not find it in > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org nor http://koji.fedoraproject.org nor > http://cbs.centos.org nor http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org > > Will be imported soon? :) Sorry, it was my fault, I lost it from the radar. It'll be ready asap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1283327] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme - Extension to Sphinx for documenting APIs built with Pecan and WSME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1272524 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272524 [Bug 1272524] Review Request: openstack-mistral - workflow Service for OpenStack cloud -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1283327] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme - Extension to Sphinx for documenting APIs built with Pecan and WSME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl | |) | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1283327] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme - Extension to Sphinx for documenting APIs built with Pecan and WSME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327 Marcos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marcos.fermin.l...@cern.ch Flags||needinfo?(zbys...@in.waw.pl ||) --- Comment #9 from Marcos --- I see this package was approved, I can not find it in http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org nor http://koji.fedoraproject.org nor http://cbs.centos.org nor http://bodhi.fedoraproject.org Will be imported soon? :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 988667] Review Request: valadoc - Documentation tool for the vala project
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=988667 --- Comment #34 from Raphael Groner --- To get sponsored, please follow the needed steps. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327078] Review Request: python-pyrtlsdr - Python binding for librtlsdr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327078 --- Comment #4 from Jan Synacek --- python2-pyrtlsdr.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rtlsdr/rtlsdrtcp.pyc python2-pyrtlsdr.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rtlsdr/rtlsdrtcp.pyo python3-pyrtlsdr.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/rtlsdr/__pycache__/rtlsdrtcp.cpython-35.pyc python3-pyrtlsdr.noarch: W: python-bytecode-without-source /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/rtlsdr/__pycache__/rtlsdrtcp.cpython-35.opt-1 You probably want to remove those. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1297550] Review Request: golang-github-jmespath-go-jmespath - Golang implementation of JMESPath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297550 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1256978 CC||jchal...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Matthias Runge --- *** Bug 1327534 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256978 [Bug 1256978] cadvisor-v0.22.2 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327534] Review Request: golang-github-jmespath-go-jmespath - Golang implementation of JMESPath
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327534 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2016-04-21 02:59:31 --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1297550 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
