[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kactivities-stats-5.21.0-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf31130ed7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System  ---
kdepim4-4.14.10-24.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4df8065ced

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1287201] Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kross-interpreters-16.04.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9594588add

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329807] Review Request: raqm - Complex Textlayout Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl



--- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek  ---
raqm.src: E: description-line-too-long C Library that encapsulates the logic
for complex text layout and provide a convenient API.

Also "provides" not "provide".

raqm-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on raqm/raqm-libs/libraqm

raqm-devel.x86_64: E: non-devel-file-in-devel-package
/usr/lib64/libraqm.so.0.0.0
raqm-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin
/usr/lib64/libraqm.so.0.0.0
raqm-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun
/usr/lib64/libraqm.so.0.0.0
→ .so should be in -devel, .so.* in the main package.

%license should be used for the license file.

No %check? Upstream README says that there are unit tests.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1287201] Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kross-interpreters-16.04.0-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1da015da73

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1287201] Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kross-interpreters-16.04.0-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9594588add

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1287201] Review Request: kf5-kross-interpreters - Kross interpreters for KDE Frameworks 5

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1287201

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kactivities-stats-5.21.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e8ca16cb0e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323832] Review Request: kf5-kactivities-stats - A KDE Frameworks 5 Tier 3 library for accessing the usage data collected by the activities system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323832



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
kf5-kactivities-stats-5.21.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-cf31130ed7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1316186] Review Request: python-librosa - a python package for music and audio analysis

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316186

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-librosa-0.4.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-edea31c6fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327050] Review Request: can-utils - SocketCAN userspace utilities and tools

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327050

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
can-utils-20160229git-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8c1e55e18e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327784] Review Request: nauty - Graph canonical labeling and automorphism group computation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327784

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
nauty-2.6.5-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1c5728a7a8

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
kdepim4-4.14.10-24.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-4df8065ced

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329852] Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for Erlang-based systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1329846




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient
instrumentation of Erlang code
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1329848, 1329852




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848
[Bug 1329848] Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform
utilities for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852
[Bug 1329852] Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for
Erlang-based systems
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329848] Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform utilities for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1329846




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient
instrumentation of Erlang code
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329852] New: Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for Erlang-based systems

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852

Bug ID: 1329852
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility
for Erlang-based systems
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-setup.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-setup-1.7-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: While Erlang/OTP comes with many wonderful applications, including
the Mnesia DBMS, there is no standard or convention for installing a system.
Erlang/OTP provides tools for building a boot script, and rules for setting
environment variables, etc., and Mnesia offers an API for creating and
modifying the database schema.

However, with no convention for when these tools and API functions are called -
and by whom - application developers are left having to invent a lot of code
and scripts, not to mention meditate over chapters of Erlang/OTP documentation
in order to figure out how things fit together.

This utility offers a framework for initializing and configuring a system, with
a set of conventions allowing each component to provide callbacks for different
steps in the installation procedure.

The callbacks are defined through OTP application environment variables, which
can easily be overriden at install time.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329850] New: Review Request: erlang-riak_ensemble - Multi-Paxos framework in Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329850

Bug ID: 1329850
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-riak_ensemble - Multi-Paxos
framework in Erlang
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-riak_ensemble.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-riak_ensemble-2.1.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: A consensus library that supports creating multiple consensus
groups (ensembles). Each ensemble is a separate Multi-Paxos instance with its
own leader, set of members, and state.

Each ensemble also supports an extended API that provides consistent key/value
operations. Conceptually, this is identical to treating each key as a separate
Paxos entity. However, this isn't accomplished by having each key maintain its
own Paxos group. Instead, an ensemble emulates per-key consensus through a
combination of per-key and per-ensemble state.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329849] New: Review Request: erlang-riak_dt - Convergent replicated datatypes in Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329849

Bug ID: 1329849
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-riak_dt - Convergent replicated
datatypes in Erlang
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-riak_dt.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-riak_dt-2.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: A set of state based CRDTs implemented in Erlang.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329848] New: Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform utilities for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848

Bug ID: 1329848
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform
utilities for Erlang
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-parse_trans.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-parse_trans-2.9.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Parse transform utilities for Erlang
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329847] New: Review Request: erlang-kvc - Key Value Coding for Erlang data structures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329847

Bug ID: 1329847
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-kvc - Key Value Coding for
Erlang data structures
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-kvc.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-kvc-1.7.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: kvc supports Key Value Coding-like queries on common Erlang data
structures. A common use case for kvc is to quickly access one or more deep
values in decoded JSON, or some other nested data structure. It can also help
with some aggregate operations. It solves similar problems that you might want
to use a tool like XPath or jQuery for, but it is far simpler and strictly less
powerful. It's inspired by Apple's NSKeyValueCoding protocol from Objective-C.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329845] New: Review Request: erlang-eflame - Flame Graph profiler for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329845

Bug ID: 1329845
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-eflame - Flame Graph profiler
for Erlang
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-eflame.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-eflame-0-0.1.gita085181.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Flame Graph profiler for Erlang
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329844] New: Review Request: erlang-clique - CLI Framework for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329844

Bug ID: 1329844
   Summary: Review Request: erlang-clique - CLI Framework for
Erlang
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lemen...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-clique.spec
SRPM URL:
https://peter.fedorapeople.org/packages/erlang-clique-0.3.5-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Clique is an opinionated framework for building command line
interfaces in Erlang. It provides users with an interface that gives them
enough power to build complex CLIs, but enough constraint to make them appear
consistent.
Fedora Account System Username: peter

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1277260] Review Request: rofi - A window switcher, run dialog and dmenu replacement

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277260



--- Comment #10 from Maxim Orlov  ---
Update to 1.0.0

Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/region51/rofi/rofi.git/plain/rofi.spec?id=1523dd3c64b16df67724ce89e19ba0f194c34006

SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/region51/rofi/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00175931-rofi/rofi-1.0.0-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323334] Review Request: qtpass - Multi-platform GUI for pass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334

Antti Järvinen  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #8 from Antti Järvinen  ---
Must items are ok, rpmlint is quiet except for missing manpage but that is more
like upstream problem -> setting this review to passed.

--
Antti

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1321473] Review Request: diodon - Clipboard manager for GNOME, Cinnamon and other Gtk desktops

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473



--- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner  ---
http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~diodon-team/diodon/trunk/revision/512

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1321473] Review Request: diodon - Clipboard manager for GNOME, Cinnamon and other Gtk desktops

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321473



--- Comment #12 from Raphael Groner  ---
Successfully upstreamed the patch for desktop file validation.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/diodon/+bug/1562563

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188

Dan Williams  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1274541



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188



--- Comment #4 from Dan Williams  ---
The NVML Makefiles appear to defeat passing through the system CFLAGS, only
local flags are specified.  For example, nvml.spec is missing a %configure
line.

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188



--- Comment #3 from Dan Williams  ---
ExlcudeArch must be used for each architecture that a package does not build /
run on, and a bug must be filed for each [1].  However, what prevents nvml from
being compiled on other architectures besides x86_64?  Seems this could be
accomplished with some fall backs.

[1]:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines?rd=Packaging/Guidelines#Architecture_Support

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329838] New: Review Request: ghc-uglymemo - A simple (but internally ugly) memoization function

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838

Bug ID: 1329838
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-uglymemo - A simple (but
internally ugly) memoization function
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-uglymemo/ghc-uglymemo.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-uglymemo/ghc-uglymemo-0.1.0.1-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description:
A simple (but internally ugly) memoization function.

Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329838] Review Request: ghc-uglymemo - A simple (but internally ugly) memoization function

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329838

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
   ||roject.org
 Blocks||1202163
  Alias||ghc-uglymemo




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202163
[Bug 1202163] ghc-hledger-lib-0.27 is available
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1319289] Review Request: rubygem-review - Flexible document format/conversion system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289



--- Comment #8 from Antonio Trande  ---
Spec URL: https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-review/rubygem-review.spec
SRPM URL:
https://sagitter.fedorapeople.org/rubygem-review/rubygem-review-1.7.2-3.fc23.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256083] Review Request: ghc-x509 - X509 reader and writer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256083



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509/ghc-x509.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509/ghc-x509-1.6.3-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256085] Review Request: ghc-x509-validation - X.509 Certificate and CRL validation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256085



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-validation/ghc-x509-validation.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-validation/ghc-x509-validation-1.6.3-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256087] Review Request: ghc-x509-system - Handle per-operating-system X.509 accessors and storage

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256087



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-system/ghc-x509-system.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-system/ghc-x509-system-1.6.3-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256084] Review Request: ghc-x509-store - X.509 collection accessing and storing methods

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256084



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-store/ghc-x509-store.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-x509-store/ghc-x509-store-1.6.1-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1319289] Review Request: rubygem-review - Flexible document format/conversion system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289



--- Comment #7 from Mukundan Ragavan  ---
ed attempt to not list same file two times.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > -doc package will have no difference. Please fix this.
> > 
> 
> Sorry, I miss it.
> Fix what?

Nothing to fix here. I meant to say "please fix this" in the context of
%license macro.

Hope that clarifies.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256086] Review Request: ghc-tls - TLS/SSL protocol native implementation (Server and Client)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256086



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-tls/ghc-tls.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-tls/ghc-tls-1.3.4-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256088] Review Request: ghc-socks - Socks proxy (version 5) implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256088



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-socks/ghc-socks.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-socks/ghc-socks-0.5.4-2.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256080] Review Request: ghc-pem - Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM) format reader and writer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256080



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-pem/ghc-pem.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-pem/ghc-pem-0.2.2-2.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256056] Review Request: ghc-memory - Memory and related abstraction functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256056



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-memory/ghc-memory.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-memory/ghc-memory-0.11-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256090] Review Request: ghc-http-client-tls - Http-client backend using the connection package and tls library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256090



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client-tls/ghc-http-client-tls-0.2.4-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256073] Review Request: ghc-http-client - An HTTP client engine, intended as a base layer for more user-friendly packages

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256073



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client/ghc-http-client.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-client/ghc-http-client-0.4.28-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256075] Review Request: ghc-hourglass - Simple performant time related library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256075



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hourglass/ghc-hourglass.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-hourglass/ghc-hourglass-0.2.10-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256089] Review Request: ghc-connection - Simple and easy network connections API

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256089



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-connection/ghc-connection.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-connection/ghc-connection-0.2.5-2.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256059] Review Request: ghc-feed - Interfacing with RSS (v 0.9x, 2.x, 1.0) + Atom feeds

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256059



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-feed/ghc-feed.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-feed/ghc-feed-0.3.11.1-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256055] Review Request: ghc-cryptonite - Cryptography Primitives sink

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256055



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-cryptonite/ghc-cryptonite.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-cryptonite/ghc-cryptonite-0.10-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329834] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329834

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap
   ||roject.org
 Blocks||630276 (ghc-clientsession)
  Alias||ghc-cipher-aes




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276
[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a
cookie
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a cookie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1329834 (ghc-cipher-aes)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329834
[Bug 1329834] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher
implementation with advanced mode of operations
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329834] New: Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329834

Bug ID: 1329834
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher
implementation with advanced mode of operations
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: maths...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-cipher-aes/ghc-cipher-aes.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-cipher-aes/ghc-cipher-aes-0.2.11-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description:

Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations.

The modes of operations available are ECB (Electronic code book), CBC (Cipher
block chaining), CTR (Counter), XTS (XEX with ciphertext stealing), GCM (Galois
Counter Mode).

The AES implementation uses AES-NI when available (on x86 and x86-64
architecture), but fallback gracefully to a software C implementation.

The software implementation uses S-Boxes, which might suffer for cache timing
issues. However do notes that most other known software implementations,
including very popular one (openssl, gnutls) also uses similar implementation.
If it matters for your case, you should make sure you have AES-NI available, or
you'll need to use a different implementation.

Fedora Account System Username: mathstuf

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 923574] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923574

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
  Alias|ghc-cipher-aes  |



--- Comment #7 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Whoops.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 923574] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923574

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||maths...@gmail.com
 Blocks|201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW), |
   |630276 (ghc-clientsession)  |



--- Comment #6 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Removing alias; will file a new RR.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276
[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a
cookie
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a cookie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|923574 (ghc-cipher-aes) |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923574
[Bug 923574] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher
implementation with advanced mode of operations
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 923574] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher implementation with advanced mode of operations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923574

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||630276 (ghc-clientsession)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276
[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a
cookie
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 630276] Review Request: ghc-clientsession - Store session data in a cookie

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630276

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||923574 (ghc-cipher-aes)



--- Comment #8 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-clientsession/ghc-clientsession.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-clientsession/ghc-clientsession-0.9.1.1-1.fc25.src.rpm

Will also need ghc-crypto-random (new review).


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923574
[Bug 923574] Review Request: ghc-cipher-aes - Fast AES cipher
implementation with advanced mode of operations
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1313828] Review Request: open-nat - Library to allow port forwarding in NAT devices that support UPNP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1313828



--- Comment #8 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/open-nat

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256076] Review Request: ghc-asn1-types - ASN.1 types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256076

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1256056 (ghc-memory)



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-types/ghc-asn1-types.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-types/ghc-asn1-types-0.3.2-1.fc25.src.rpm


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256056
[Bug 1256056] Review Request: ghc-memory - Memory and related abstraction
functions
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256056] Review Request: ghc-memory - Memory and related abstraction functions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256056

Ben Boeckel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1256076 (ghc-asn1-types)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256076
[Bug 1256076] Review Request: ghc-asn1-types - ASN.1 types
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327078] Review Request: python-pyrtlsdr - Python binding for librtlsdr

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327078



--- Comment #7 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pyrtlsdr

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1283327] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme - Extension to Sphinx for documenting APIs built with Pecan and WSME

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1283327



--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-pecanwsme

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256079] Review Request: ghc-asn1-parse - Simple monadic parser for ASN1 stream types

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256079



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-parse/ghc-asn1-parse.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-parse/ghc-asn1-parse-0.9.4-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327528] Review Request: perl-Tree - Tree data structure

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327528



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Tree

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1328390] Review Request: infinipath-psm - Intel Performance Scaled Messaging (PSM) Libraries

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1328390



--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/infinipath-psm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1243249] Review Request: python-nbformat - The Jupyter Notebook format

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243249

Thomas Spura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1327994




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994
[Bug 1327994] Re-Review Request: python-jupyter-core - Jupyter core
package. A base package on which Jupyter projects rely
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1242709] Review Request: python-jupyter_core - Core Jupyter functionality

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1242709

Thomas Spura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||toms...@fedoraproject.org
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |DUPLICATE



--- Comment #9 from Thomas Spura  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1327994 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327994] Re-Review Request: python-jupyter-core - Jupyter core package. A base package on which Jupyter projects rely

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994

Thomas Spura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1243249



--- Comment #19 from Thomas Spura  ---
*** Bug 1242709 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243249
[Bug 1243249] Review Request: python-nbformat - The Jupyter Notebook format
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327497] Review Request: golang-github-go-ini-ini - Package ini provides INI file read and write functionality in Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327497



--- Comment #12 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-go-ini-ini

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327994] Re-Review Request: python-jupyter-core - Jupyter core package. A base package on which Jupyter projects rely

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994

Thomas Spura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Re-Review Request:
   |python-jupyter-core -   |python-jupyter-core -
   |Jupyter core package. A |Jupyter core package. A
   |base package on which   |base package on which
   |Jupyter projects rely   |Jupyter projects rely



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1264945] Review Request: mallard-rng - RELAX NG schemas for all Mallard versions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264945



--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/mallard-rng

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324235] Review Request: python-cytoolz - Cython implementation of the toolz package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324235



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-cytoolz

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327994] Review Request: python-jupyter-core - Jupyter core package. A base package on which Jupyter projects rely

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327994

Thomas Spura  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(tomspur@fedorapro |
   |ject.org)   |



--- Comment #18 from Thomas Spura  ---
Thanks for the review!

Sorry, Orion, for missing your jupyter_core package...

Upstream is unfortunately not consistently using either jupyter_core or
jupyter-core:
https://jupyter-core.readthedocs.org/en/latest/changelog.html

(In reply to Jonathan Underwood from comment #13)
> [!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
>  Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python2.7/site-
>  packages/jupyter_core/tests(python-jupyter_core), /usr/lib/python2.7
>  /site-packages/jupyter_core/utils(python-jupyter_core),
>  /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/jupyter_core(python-jupyter_core)
> 
> Seems this package is already in Fedora
> [!]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> 
> See above
> 
> [!]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
>  Provides are present.
> 
> If this is actually intended by a package rename review, then this
> needs addessing

The obsoletes/provides of the existing package are added.

> = EXTRA items =
> 
> Generic:
> [!]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
>  Note: Spec file as given by url is not the same as in SRPM (see
>  attached diff).
>  See: (this test has no URL)
> 
> Needs fixing!

Sorry, for the debug print in the spec. Removed and fixed.

> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
>  Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
> 
> 
> Rpmlint
> ---
> Checking: python2-jupyter-core-4.1.0-3.fc25.noarch.rpm
>   python3-jupyter-core-4.1.0-3.fc25.noarch.rpm
>   python-jupyter-core-doc-4.1.0-3.fc25.noarch.rpm
>   python-jupyter-core-4.1.0-3.fc25.src.rpm
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-2
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-2.7
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-2.7
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-2
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/paths.pyc expected 3350 (3.5),
> found 62211 (2.7)
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/__init__.pyc expected 3350
> (3.5), found 62211 (2.7)
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/version.pyc expected 3350
> (3.5), found 62211 (2.7)
> 
> 
> These look very worrying, suggests the wrong pyton interpreter has
> been used for their generation?

It seems %py2_build and %py3_build builds (and compiles) in ./build/ and
python3 installs the pyc files, generated from python2.
Workaround at the beginning of %install:
find | grep pyc$ | xargs rm -v

This needs proper fixing in distutils...

> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-3.5
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-3
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-3.5
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-3
> 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 10 warnings.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Rpmlint (installed packages)
> 
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-2
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-2
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-2.7
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-2.7
> python2-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/version.pyc expected 3350
> (3.5), found 62211 (2.7)
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/paths.pyc expected 3350 (3.5),
> found 62211 (2.7)
> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: E: python-bytecode-wrong-magic-value
> /usr/lib/python3.5/site-packages/jupyter_core/__init__.pyc expected 3350
> (3.5), found 62211 (2.7)
> 
> 
> These look very worrying, suggests the wrong pyton interpreter has
> been used for their generation?

Fixed above.

> python3-jupyter-core.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jupyter-migrate-3
> 

[Bug 1256077] Review Request: ghc-asn1-encoding - ASN1 data reader and writer in RAW, BER and DER forms

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256077



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-encoding/ghc-asn1-encoding.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-asn1-encoding/ghc-asn1-encoding-0.9.3-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324270] Review Request: python-spur - Run commands locally or over SSH using the same interface

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324270



--- Comment #3 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-spur

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1245022] Review Request: ghc-base-compat - A compatibility layer for base

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245022



--- Comment #1 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-base-compat/ghc-base-compat.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-base-compat/ghc-base-compat-0.9.1-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256046] Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046



--- Comment #13 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/eventd/eventd.spec
SRPM URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/eventd/eventd-0.13-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324957] Review Request: python-pypandoc - Thin wrapper for pandoc

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324957



--- Comment #4 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-pypandoc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256091] Review Request: ghc-http-conduit - HTTP client package with conduit interface and HTTPS support

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256091



--- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit-2.1.10-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1314974] Review Request: kdepim4 - KDE4 PIM (Personal Information Manager) applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314974



--- Comment #23 from Kevin Fenzi  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/kdepim4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256058] Review Request: ghc-fdo-notify - Desktop Notifications client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256058



--- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel  ---
Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-fdo-notify/ghc-fdo-notify.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-fdo-notify/ghc-fdo-notify-0.3.1-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1256051] Review Request: ghc-sandi - Data encoding library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256051



--- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel  ---
My host moved; files weren't re-extracted. Updated and reuploaded.

Spec URL: http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-sandi/ghc-sandi.spec
SRPM URL:
http://benboeckel.net/packaging/ghc-sandi/ghc-sandi-0.3.6-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329188] Review Request: nvml - Non-Volatile Memory Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329188

Dan Williams  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||krzysztof.czur...@intel.com
  Flags||needinfo?(krzysztof.czurylo
   ||@intel.com)



--- Comment #2 from Dan Williams  ---
What is the function of "%post -n libpmem" and "%preun -n libpmem" scripts to
manipulate %{_sysconfdir}/magic?  Can this be moved internally to the build
process?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323334] Review Request: qtpass - Multi-platform GUI for pass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334



--- Comment #7 from Dave Olsthoorn  ---
Spec URL: https://daveo.fedorapeople.org/qtpass-1.1.1-2/qtpass.spec
SRPM URL:
https://daveo.fedorapeople.org/qtpass-1.1.1-2/qtpass-1.1.1-2.fc23.src.rpm

Changes:
* require hicolor to resolve directory ownership

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1229903] Review Request: NetworkManager-sstp - NetworkManager VPN plugin for SSTP

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229903

Lubomir Rintel  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|i...@cicku.me  |lkund...@v3.sk
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   |needinfo?(i...@cicku.me)   |



--- Comment #11 from Lubomir Rintel  ---
*Sponsor hat on*
No response from the reviewer.

Thanks for packaging this. The package now addresses all points risen in review
and looks good.

APPROVED

Please note that there has been many updates for the plugin for NetworkManager
1.2 that's in Fedora 24. I asked the upstream to do a 1.2.0 release and they
will probably do that anytime soon

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323334] Review Request: qtpass - Multi-platform GUI for pass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334



--- Comment #6 from Dave Olsthoorn  ---
> so it seems to me is that the only real remaining issue is removal of
> %dir %{_datadir}/icons/
> but leaving the
> %dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
> %dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable
> even tough it is weird. 

Wouldn't it be better to just require hicolor? I say this as someone that had
trouble in the past with rpm directory ownership (google-chrome not being
packaged properly by google).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329807] Review Request: raqm - Complex Textlayout Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807

Mosaab Alzoubi  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1329817




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329817
[Bug 1329817] Enable complex textlayout on ImageMagick
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323334] Review Request: qtpass - Multi-platform GUI for pass

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323334



--- Comment #5 from Antti Järvinen  ---
Hey, 

so it seems to me is that the only real remaining issue is removal of
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/
but leaving the
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor
%dir %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor/scalable
even tough it is weird. 

--
Antti

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1329807] New: Review Request: raqm - Complex Textlayout Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329807

Bug ID: 1329807
   Summary: Review Request: raqm - Complex Textlayout Library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: moc...@hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: http://pastebin.com/raw/hWvn0dk7
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/moceap/Raqm/fedora-24-x86_64/00180085-raqm/raqm-0.1.0-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Complex Textlayout Library
Fedora Account System Username: moceap

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1319289] Review Request: rubygem-review - Flexible document format/conversion system

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319289



--- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande  ---
(In reply to Mukundan Ragavan from comment #5)
> 
> 
> There is one mistake in the spec file. You are installing the license file
> and immediately excluding it.
> 
> %license %{gem_instdir}/COPYING
> 
> 
> 
> %exclude %{gem_instdir}/COPYING
> 
> Why?
> 
> 
> I got rid of the exclude line and built a package. See the difference in
> files here - 
> 
> $ diff -Nu w_excld wo_excld
> --- w_excld   2016-04-20 18:58:21.183113956 -0400
> +++ wo_excld  2016-04-20 18:57:55.818377962 -0400
> @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
>  /usr/bin/review-validate
>  /usr/bin/review-vol
>  /usr/share/gems/gems/review-1.7.2
> +/usr/share/gems/gems/review-1.7.2/COPYING
>  /usr/share/gems/gems/review-1.7.2/ChangeLog
>  /usr/share/gems/gems/review-1.7.2/Dockerfile
>  /usr/share/gems/gems/review-1.7.2/Gemfile
> 
> 
> wo_excld - package build without the exclude lien
> w_excld - package build with the spec linked here.

Failed attempt to not list same file two times.

> 
> 
> -doc package will have no difference. Please fix this.
> 

Sorry, I miss it.
Fix what?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org