[Bug 1334112] Review Request: pintail - build web sites from plain text markup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334112 --- Comment #1 from Pete Travis--- Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/immanetize/pintail/pintail.git/plain/pintail.spec?id=ec3733276d954ed9bf62d270c6501c2813e14b8c SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/immanetize/pintail/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00266844-pintail/pintail-0.2-1.fc25.src.rpm Now shipping a newer upstream tag, with added requires. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1319839] Review Request: rocket-depot - GTK+ 3 rdesktop/ xfreerdp front-end
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1319839 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- rocket-depot-1.0.0-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9039104b1f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1333970] Review Request: plasma-applet-redshift-control - Plasma 5 applet for redshift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333970 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System--- plasma-applet-redshift-control-1.0.17-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-97b9e0ad10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1333970] Review Request: plasma-applet-redshift-control - Plasma 5 applet for redshift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333970 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System--- plasma-applet-redshift-control-1.0.17-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b2e29dc70b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-121040bfb7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency-0-0.1.gitb86b1ec.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-d143126c5d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1278960] Review Request: nodejs-heap - Binary heap (priority queue) algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278960 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-heap-0.2.6-4.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-is-builtin-module-1.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1333970] Review Request: plasma-applet-redshift-control - Plasma 5 applet for redshift
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333970 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- plasma-applet-redshift-control-1.0.17-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8198362676 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1325023] edk2: distribute ovmf/aavmf roms (now that licensing issues are resolved)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325023 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #32 from Fedora Update System --- edk2-20160418gita8c39ba-0.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-9f7573e344 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- erlang-exometer_core-1.4-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d1a18110db -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency-0-0.1.gitb86b1ec.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-323ac73e11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fe542e196a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-has-ansi-2.0.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314865] Review Request: booth - Ticket Manager for Multi-site Clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314865 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System--- booth-1.0-2.eb4256a.git.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244571] Review Request: drush - Command line shell and scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244571 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System--- drush-6.7.0-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-has-ansi-2.0.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-is-builtin-module-1.0.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1332206] Review Request: python-pysocks - A Python SOCKS client module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332206 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- python-pysocks-1.5.6-2.fc22, python-requests-2.10.0-1.fc22, python-urllib3-1.15.1-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1314865] Review Request: booth - Ticket Manager for Multi-site Clusters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1314865 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System--- booth-1.0-2.eb4256a.git.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1244571] Review Request: drush - Command line shell and scripting interface for Drupal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244571 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System--- drush-6.7.0-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1309909] Review Request: python3-tornado - Scalable, non-blocking web server and tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1309909 Orion Poplawskichanged: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1295484 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321416] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mailnag - A Gnome-Shell extension for mailnag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321416 philip.worr...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(bugzilla@heiko-ad ||ams.de) --- Comment #3 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com --- Hello, Thanks for posting the SRPM. I am NOT a fedora packager but i'm happy to carry out an informal review whilst you look for a sponsor. Hopefully it can give some help on how you can improve your package. Please check the items below. Comments == * There is a newer version of this package listed as 3.20 (https://github.com/pulb/mailnag-gnome-shell/archive/v3.20.0.tar.gz) * In your spec file you have some code referring to the git scm for this package but i noticed that upstream is providing packaged releases. You might want to simplyfy your spec file by removing the git sections and using the upstream release tarballs as sources. * Since fedora 18 the Group tag is ignored. In any case other gnome shell extensions in the repo use Group: User Interface/Desktops * The upstream source package includes a LICENCE file, you should use %licence in the %files section to include it. * Similarly you might want to package the README.md file as documentation using %doc. * On the project's website vala is listed as a build dependency, you should add this to the buildrequires section. * At runtime this package appears to require the mailnag (>= 1.2) daemon. You should add a dependency for it in the spec file. * You should probably add a runtime dependency to gnome-tweak-tool so that users can enable this extension through the gui. i.e. Requires: gnome-tweak-tool * In the files section, %{_datadir}/gnome-shell/extensions/mail...@pulb.github.com/*, I think that you can remove the asterisk at the end so that this package owns this folder. * If you add a patch you should add a comment to explain what it does and list it in the changelog. When i look at your patch it appears to allow version 3.18 of this package to register in gnome 3.20 but upstream say that you need version 3.20 for gnome 3.20 support. I think if you update your spec file for version 3.20 you can probably drop this patch altogether. * The %clean section is unnecessary * Does this package fail to build on any architectures supported by fedora?, if so you should add an ExcludeArch tag for any said architectures. * The %build section is unnecessary in this case * When upgrading to a new upstream release you should set the release number back to 1. From your changelog it looks like you forgot to do this when you introduced version 3.18 and its still at 2. * Its hard to say from the %description whether i *need* to install this package. Maybe you should revise the description section (e.g use the description used by the FSF or the related Debian package)... This package provides GNOME Shell integration for Mailnag. It includes the following features: notifies about new mails via the messaging tray (including a counter badge), shows an indicator in the top panel (including counter badge and popup menu) and supports lock screen integration. * Compared with the mailnag extension listed on gnome.org an important feature of this package is that it ships with support for avatars. You might want to list this fact in the description. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/worralph/fedora-review/gnome-shell-extension- mailnag/licensecheck.txt [!]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/gnome- shell/extensions/mail...@pulb.github.com [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gnome- shell/extensions/mail...@pulb.github.com [-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]:
[Bug 1336555] New: Review Request: python3-pytz - World Timezone Definitions for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336555 Bug ID: 1336555 Summary: Review Request: python3-pytz - World Timezone Definitions for Python Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: or...@cora.nwra.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytz.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-pytz-2016.4-1.el7.src.rpm Description: pytz brings the Olson tz database into Python. This library allows accurate and cross platform timezone calculations using Python 2.3 or higher. It also solves the issue of ambiguous times at the end of daylight savings, which you can read more about in the Python Library Reference (datetime.tzinfo). Almost all (over 540) of the Olson timezones are supported. Fedora Account System Username: orion This is for EPEL7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336552] Review Request: exodusii - Library to store and retrieve transient finite element data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552 Christoph Junghanschanged: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/losalamo ||s/flecsi/issues/74 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336552] Review Request: exodusii - Library to store and retrieve transient finite element data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552 Christoph Junghanschanged: What|Removed |Added URL||http://koji.fedoraproject.o ||rg/koji/taskinfo?taskID=141 ||15052 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336552] New: Review Request: exodusii - Library to store and retrieve transient finite element data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336552 Bug ID: 1336552 Summary: Review Request: exodusii - Library to store and retrieve transient finite element data Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jungh...@votca.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/junghans/fedora-review/master/exodusii/exodusii.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/junghans/fedora-review/raw/master/exodusii/exodusii-6.02-0.src.rpm Description: EXODUS II is a model developed to store and retrieve data for finite element analyses. It is used for preprocessing (problem definition), postprocessing (results visualization), as well as code to code data transfer. An EXODUS II data file is a random access, machine independent, binary file that is written and read via C, C++, or Fortran library routines which comprise the Application Programming Interface (API). Fedora Account System Username: junghans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1203380] Review Request: gherkin2-java - A fast lexer and parser for the Gherkin language based on Ragel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203380 --- Comment #9 from gil cattaneo--- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #8) > Looks good. Thanks! > > Issues: > === > - Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided > in the spec URL. > Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in /home/builder/fedora- > review/1203380-gherkin2-java/diff.txt > See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL > => Please fix. > > $ cat /home/builder/fedora-review/1203380-gherkin2-java/diff.txt > Nur in > /home/builder/fedora-review/1203380-gherkin2-java/srpm-unpacked/v2.12.2.tar. > gz-extract: gherkin-2.12.2. > Nur in > /home/builder/fedora-review/1203380-gherkin2-java/upstream-unpacked/Source0: > gherkin2-2.12.2. Done Spec URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/gherkin2-java.spec SRPM URL: https://gil.fedorapeople.org/gherkin2-java-2.12.2-2.fc23.src.rpm thanks for the review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 15:07:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-graceful-readlink-1.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1278960] Review Request: nodejs-heap - Binary heap (priority queue) algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278960 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NOTABUG |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 15:06:30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291390] Review Request: nodejs-graceful-readlink - The graceful fs.readlink functionality
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291390 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Resolution|CURRENTRELEASE |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291391] Review Request: nodejs-has-ansi - Check if a string has ANSI escape codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291391 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-has-ansi-2.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 15:06:51 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1278960] Review Request: nodejs-heap - Binary heap (priority queue) algorithms
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278960 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-heap-0.2.6-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 15:06:39 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1274738] Review Request: nodejs-nth-check - A performant nth-check parser & compiler
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1274738 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-nth-check-1.0.1-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291364] Review Request: nodejs-escape-string-regexp - Escape RegExp special characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291364 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-escape-string-regexp-1.0.3-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1291392] Review Request: nodejs-is-builtin-module - Check if a string matches the name of a Node.js builtin module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1291392 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- nodejs-is-builtin-module-1.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321416] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mailnag - A Gnome-Shell extension for mailnag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321416 Heiko Adamschanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(bugzilla@heiko-ad | |ams.de) | --- Comment #2 from Heiko Adams --- http://repo.heiko-adams.de/gnome-shell-extension-mailnag-3.18.0-2.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 --- Comment #5 from Peter Jones--- Sure, I'll go with shim-unsigned-aarch64. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1293630] Review Request: wallch - A wallpaper changer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293630 philip.worr...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philip.worrall@googlemail.c ||om --- Comment #2 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com --- Hello Jakub, I am NOT an official packager but i have tried to do an informal review. The application installs but just running it for a few minutes I noticed a couple of key bugs. For example the wallpaper of the day does not work because some of the websites images are fetched from now use https. Furthermore, I couldn't get wallpaper clocks to work either. I think the upstream have stopped doing regular releases but you can find a more recent (non-released) revision in launchpad where a couple of these issues have been fixed. I started to modify the specfile (adding a generate-tarball script to checkout the latest revision from launchpad) but it wont build until your patches are rebased on the later revision i.e. the dependency on unity needs removing. I started to have a look at this but its not trivial because a lot of files have been moved around. I have attached the script i wrote, id be happy to take another look if you revised your patches against the newer revision of this package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1293630] Review Request: wallch - A wallpaper changer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293630 --- Comment #1 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com --- Created attachment 1158061 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1158061=edit generate tarball from launchpad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 Peter Robinsonchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #3 from Peter Robinson --- So mostly fine. Just a couple of queries around package naming, should probably be called shim-unsigned-aarch64 with provides/obsoletes for shim-unsigned to avoid conflicts and smooth upgrade, but other than that all OK. shim-aarch64-0.9-1.fc25.src.rpm shim-unsigned-0.9-1.fc25.aarch64.rpm Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [ ]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2 clause)", "*No copyright* BSD", "Unknown or generated". 396 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/pjones/shim-aarch64/1335654-shim- aarch64/licensecheck.txt [ ]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro. [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [-]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 Peter Robinsonchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 --- Comment #4 from Peter Robinson--- Other than the naming query APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System--- python-gabbi-1.19.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329845] Review Request: erlang-eflame - Flame Graph profiler for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329845 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-eflame-0-0.1.gita085181.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329848] Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform utilities for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:27:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846 Bug 1329846 depends on bug 1329848, which changed state. Bug 1329848 Summary: Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform utilities for Erlang https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329848] Review Request: erlang-parse_trans - Parse transform utilities for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329848 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-parse_trans-2.9.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846 Bug 1329846 depends on bug 1329852, which changed state. Bug 1329852 Summary: Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for Erlang-based systems https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329847] Review Request: erlang-kvc - Key Value Coding for Erlang data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329847 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:27:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329847] Review Request: erlang-kvc - Key Value Coding for Erlang data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329847 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-kvc-1.7.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329845] Review Request: erlang-eflame - Flame Graph profiler for Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329845 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:27:31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329852] Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for Erlang-based systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-setup-1.7-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329852] Review Request: erlang-setup - Generic setup utility for Erlang-based systems
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329852 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:27:56 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1252812] Review Request: python-gabbi - Declarative HTTP testing library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1252812 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:25:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329849] Review Request: erlang-riak_dt - Convergent replicated data types in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329849 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:22:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329849] Review Request: erlang-riak_dt - Convergent replicated data types in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329849 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-riak_dt-2.1.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329850] Review Request: erlang-riak_ensemble - Multi-Paxos framework in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329850 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:21:49 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329850] Review Request: erlang-riak_ensemble - Multi-Paxos framework in Erlang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329850 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-riak_ensemble-2.1.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329424] Review Request: gimp-save-for-web - Save for web plug-in for GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System--- gimp-save-for-web-0.29.3-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329424] Review Request: gimp-save-for-web - Save for web plug-in for GIMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329424 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-05-16 12:19:29 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 --- Comment #2 from Peter Jones--- And the review.txt is here: http://pjones.fedorapeople.org/shim-aarch64/review.txt As always, it is filled with misleading results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335654] Review Request: shim-aarch64 - UEFI shim for aarch64
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335654 Peter Robinsonchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||pbrobin...@gmail.com QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |pbrobin...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279091] Review Request: openra-eluant - Lua C# bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279091 Raphael Gronerchanged: What|Removed |Added Summary|Review Request: eluant - C# |Review Request: |bindings for Lua with a |openra-eluant - Lua C# |specific focus on building |bindings |sandboxes | Alias|eluant |openra-eluant Whiteboard|NotReady| --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner --- Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/openra-eluant.spec SRPM URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/openra/openra-eluant-20160124-1.src.rpm Description: Lua C# bindings Fedora Account System Username: raphgro Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14110187 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1321416] Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-mailnag - A Gnome-Shell extension for mailnag
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1321416 philip.worr...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bugzi...@heiko-adams.de, ||philip.worrall@googlemail.c ||om Flags||needinfo?(bugzilla@heiko-ad ||ams.de) --- Comment #1 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com --- Hi, the SRPM url is not valid. Please post a URL where we can find the SRPM package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336458] Review Request: gplcver - interpreted Verilog simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336458 Mamoru TASAKAchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||chitl...@gmail.com, ||jaromir.ca...@email.cz, ||mtas...@fedoraproject.org Component|Package Review |gplcver Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jaromir.ca...@email.cz --- Comment #1 from Mamoru TASAKA --- Please describe in detail - the detailed, exact step-by-step procedure to reproduce the issue you are seeing - The exact issue you are seeing (if it segfaults, adding backtrace or so is also appreciated) - The expected behavior - How reproducible the issue is so that the current maintainers (or potential sponsors) can examine the issue or the patch you are trying to provide. Once changing the component to gplcver. Adding myself as CC in case that gplcver maintainers get nonresponsive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336458] Review Request: gplcver - interpreted Verilog simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336458 Mamoru TASAKAchanged: What|Removed |Added CC|package-review@lists.fedora | |project.org | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315870] Review Request: libhfi1verbs - verbs userspace driver for Intel HFIs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315870 dennis.dalessan...@intel.com changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co ||m) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1331175] Review Request: yadm - Yet Another Dotfiles Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331175 philip.worr...@googlemail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||philip.worrall@googlemail.c ||om Flags||needinfo?(sultan@locehilios ||.com) --- Comment #2 from philip.worr...@googlemail.com --- Hello, This is an INFORMAL review as I am NOT an official fedora packager. * The licence is included in the source tarball but not in the files section of the spec file. * It's not necessary to use %defattr in the files section anymore * If the source code of the package provides a test suite, it should be executed in the %check section, whenever it is practical to do so. * Do you need to list bats as a build dependency for the testsuite? * Do you need to list gnupg2 as a dependency? * You should add the dist tag to your release version i.e. 1%{?dist} * In the changelog you MAY want to indicate that this is the initial fedora packaged version * Is Yadm only for managing dot files or is it for any type of file? * In your man page the description is.. Yadm is a tool for managing a collection of files across multiple computers using a shared Git repository. In addition, yadm provides a feature to select alternate versions of files based on the operation system or host name. Lastly, yadm supplies the ability to manage a subset of secure files, which are encrypted before they are included in the repository. I think this is better than the description listed in the spec file. Try to make it clear to the user why they would *need* this package i.e. what problem can it solve. * The Group tag is deprecated. RPM since Fedora 18 does not require the presence of the Group tag in the spec file. If the tag is defined, it will be ignored. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Dist tag is present. = MUST items = Generic: [X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GPL (v3)", "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/worralph/fedora- review/yadm/licensecheck.txt [-]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [X]: Changelog in prescribed format. [X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]:
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- erlang-exometer_core-1.4-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-d1a18110db -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1329846] Review Request: erlang-exometer_core - Easy and efficient instrumentation of Erlang code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329846 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1335988] Review Request: giac - Computer Algebra System, Symbolic calculus, Geometry
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1335988 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmekchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- > # LGPLv3+: src/Fl_GDI_Printer.cxx, src/Flv_List.cc, src/Flv_Table.cc > # BSD: src/tinymt32* > License: GPLv3+ and LGPLv3+ and BSD Are files under BSD and LGPLv3+ and GPLv3+ combined into a single compiled binary? Then the license is just GPLv3+. The "License" tag is about the binary rpm, not the sources. s/french/French/ I'm afraid you'll have to repack the tarball to remove the non-free doc part, because the SRPM must be distributable. Removing it during package build is too late. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336458] Review Request: gplcver - interpreted Verilog simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336458 Dr Jonathan Kimmittchanged: What|Removed |Added CC||jonat...@kimmitt.uk Version|rawhide |23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336458] New: Review Request: gplcver - interpreted Verilog simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336458 Bug ID: 1336458 Summary: Review Request: gplcver - interpreted Verilog simulator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jonat...@kimmitt.uk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://technophobia.org/repo/SRPMS/gplcver.spec SRPM URL: http://technophobia.org/repo/SRPMS/gplcver-2.12a-12.fc23.src.rpm Description: Partial fix for existing broken package Fedora Account System Username: jrrk2 For attention of jcapik or chitlesh The existing gplcver package in FC23 is not 64-bit clean. This causes it to fail immediately. This patched version provides a partial fix by making the 32-bit build avoid calling stat/fstat and encountering the problem. It does nothing to address the problems of the 64-bit build. I appreciate the user base for this package is limited which is probably why it has not been noticed before. copr info for future use is dnf copr enable jrrk2/gplcver Applying for sponsorship as co-maintainer and/or for the package maintainer to adopt my changes. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279090] Review Request: sdl2-cs - C# wrapper for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279090 --- Comment #3 from Matthias Mailänder--- We removed the need to contain MiniTK in https://github.com/OpenRA/SDL2-CS/releases/tag/20151227 See https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/10288 and https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenRA/pull/10299 It got replaced by custom OpenGL bindings. Note that OpenRA now also needs https://github.com/OpenRA/OpenAL-CS -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1326277] Review Request: ocitools - Collection of tools for working with the OCI runtime specification
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326277 Lokesh Mandvekarchanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Lokesh Mandvekar --- looks good, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency-0-0.1.gitb86b1ec.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-323ac73e11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-fe542e196a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327307] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency - Resiliency patterns for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327307 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-eapache-go-resiliency-0-0.1.gitb86b1ec.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-d143126c5d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327781] Review Request: golang-github-olivere-elastic - Elasticsearch client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327781 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-olivere-elastic-2.0.12-0.1.git3cfe882.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-121040bfb7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327566] Review Request: php-nikic-php-parser - A PHP parser written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327566 --- Comment #10 from Remi Collet--- Thanks again for this one New package request open on pkgdb. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327566] Review Request: php-nikic-php-parser - A PHP parser written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327566 Johan Cwiklinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Johan Cwiklinski --- Looks good to me; rpmlint output is just about spelling and can be ignored. APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327566] Review Request: php-nikic-php-parser - A PHP parser written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327566 Johan Cwiklinskichanged: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1157912 is|| obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Johan Cwiklinski --- Created attachment 1157914 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1157914=edit fedora-review output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279090] Review Request: sdl2-cs - C# wrapper for SDL2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279090 --- Comment #2 from Raphael Groner--- Needs unbundling of OpenTK. Luckily, OpenTK is already packaged. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327566] Review Request: php-nikic-php-parser - A PHP parser written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327566 --- Comment #7 from Remi Collet--- Fix rpmlint https://github.com/remicollet/remirepo/commit/42abb9f05cd542de7819486f6b5a5c9fdcc76c0e Spec: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/remicollet/remirepo/42abb9f05cd542de7819486f6b5a5c9fdcc76c0e/php/php-nikic-php-parser/php-nikic-php-parser.spec Srpm: http://rpms.remirepo.net/SRPMS/php-nikic-php-parser-2.1.0-3.remi.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1327566] Review Request: php-nikic-php-parser - A PHP parser written in PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327566 --- Comment #6 from Johan Cwiklinski--- Created attachment 1157912 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1157912=edit fedora-review output -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org