[Bug 1348775] Review Request: python-unidiff - Python library to parse and interact with unified diffs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348775

Dan Callaghan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1348778




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348778
[Bug 1348778] Review Request: ansible-review - Reviews Ansible playbooks,
roles and inventory and suggests improvements
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348778] Review Request: ansible-review - Reviews Ansible playbooks, roles and inventory and suggests improvements

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348778

Dan Callaghan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1348775




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348775
[Bug 1348775] Review Request: python-unidiff - Python library to parse and
interact with unified diffs
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348778] New: Review Request: ansible-review - Reviews Ansible playbooks, roles and inventory and suggests improvements

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348778

Bug ID: 1348778
   Summary: Review Request: ansible-review - Reviews Ansible
playbooks, roles and inventory and suggests
improvements
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ansible-review/ansible-review.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/ansible-review/ansible-review-0.7.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Tool to review Ansible playbooks, roles, and inventory and suggest
improvements.
Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348775] New: Review Request: python-unidiff - Python library to parse and interact with unified diffs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348775

Bug ID: 1348775
   Summary: Review Request: python-unidiff - Python library to
parse and interact with unified diffs
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: dcall...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-unidiff/python-unidiff.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fedorapeople.org/~dcallagh/python-unidiff/python-unidiff-0.5.2-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: python-unidiff is a Python library to parse and interact with
unified diffs (patches).
Fedora Account System Username: dcallagh

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297854] Review Request: purple-libsteam - Adds support for Steam protocol to libpurple-based messengers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297854



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
purple-libsteam-1.6.1-11.20160618gitcd5a294.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora
23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-c59b04a0bb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347857] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-templates - Prawn:: Templates allows using PDFs as templates in Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347855] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-svg - SVG renderer for Prawn PDF library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347855



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347856] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-table - Provides tables for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347856



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347854] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-manual_builder - A tool for writing manuals for Prawn and Prawn accessories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347854



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347858] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf - Converts AsciiDoc documents to PDF using Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347858



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347853] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-icon - Provides icon fonts for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347853



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347852] Review Request: rubygem-css_parser - Ruby CSS parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347852



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been
pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1218758] Review Request: flmsg - Fast Light Message Amateur Radio Forms Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758



--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System  ---
flmsg-3.00.00-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1d636db0c5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347857] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-templates - Prawn:: Templates allows using PDFs as templates in Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344446] Review Request: jboss-logging-tools1 - JBoss Logging I18n Annotation Processor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=136

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
jboss-logging-tools1-1.2.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-701d52c373

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297854] Review Request: purple-libsteam - Adds support for Steam protocol to libpurple-based messengers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297854



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
purple-libsteam-1.6.1-11.20160618gitcd5a294.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora
24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-0d535008b4

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347854] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-manual_builder - A tool for writing manuals for Prawn and Prawn accessories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347854

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347852] Review Request: rubygem-css_parser - Ruby CSS parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347852

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347855] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-svg - SVG renderer for Prawn PDF library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347855

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347856] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-table - Provides tables for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347856

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347853] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-icon - Provides icon fonts for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347853

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347858] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf - Converts AsciiDoc documents to PDF using Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347858

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24,
rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24,
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24, rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been
pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1218758] Review Request: flmsg - Fast Light Message Amateur Radio Forms Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System  ---
flmsg-3.00.00-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25e1a23b79

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1305502] Review Request: python-adal - ADAL for Python

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1305502



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-adal-0.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-3a4aff56db

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297854] Review Request: purple-libsteam - Adds support for Steam protocol to libpurple-based messengers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297854

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
purple-libsteam-1.6.1-11.20160618gitcd5a294.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora
EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in
this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-827f3e90f5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1334894] Review Request: python-sync2jira - Sync pagure and github issues to jira, via fedmsg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-sync2jira-0.2-4.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-70e77829f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1342851] Review Request: xonsh - A general purpose, Python-ish shell

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
xonsh-0.3.3-1.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1342851] Review Request: xonsh - A general purpose, Python-ish shell

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342851



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
xonsh-0.3.3-1.fc22 has been pushed to the Fedora 22 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1339029] Review Request: libinvm-cim - Framework library for Intel NVM storage common information model (CIM) providers.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339029



--- Comment #5 from Dan Williams  ---
I don't see the redhat optflags in use during the build, for example:

gcc -Wall -Werror -Wfatal-errors -fstack-protector-all -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2
-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500  -fPIC -O2 -std=c99 -MMD -D__VERSION_MAJOR__=1
-D__VERSION_MINOR__=0 -D__VERSION_HOTFIX__=0 -D__VERSION_BUILDNUM__=1039
-D__VERSION_NUMBER__=1.0.0.1039 -D__WBEM_PREFIX__='Intel_' -D__LINUX__ -I./src
-I./src/cimom -I./src/framework -I./src/common -I./src/common/logger
-I./src/common/string -I./external/rapidxml-1.13 -I./external/cmpi/include -c
src/common/string/s_str.c -o output/obj/linux/release/common/string/s_str.o  



Also, fedora-review notes that %{?_smp_mflags} is missing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1339327] Review Request: libinvm-i18n - Internationalization library supporting a subset of internationalization functionality.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1339327



--- Comment #7 from Dan Williams  ---
Looks good, only two final tasks that I see:

1/ Flesh out %description it's currently too sparse. For example clarify that
it is a base / common library for other "invm" components.

2/ Run fedora-review and supply a filled out template of "review.txt".

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1341283] Review Request: php-lukasreschke-id3parser - ID3 parser library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341283



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-lukasreschke-id3parser-0.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1327511] Review Request: php-justinrainbow-json-schema - A library to validate a json schema

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1327511



--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-justinrainbow-json-schema-2.0.5-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1270322] Review Request: chromium - A WebKit (Blink) powered web browser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270322



--- Comment #47 from Jorge Martínez López  ---
Yep, Chromium in F24 is pretty much broken, I see the pages loading and upon
finishing I get the "Aw, snap" page. I managed to rescue this trace but I don't
think it's very informative:

[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:script_context.cc(111)] Created context:
  extension id:   (none)
  frame:  (nil)
  URL:
  context_type:   UNSPECIFIED
  effective extension id: (none)
  effective context type: UNSPECIFIED
[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:dispatcher.cc(333)] Num tracked contexts: 4
[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:script_context.cc(118)] Destroyed context for
extension
  extension id: 
  effective extension id: 
[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:script_context.cc(118)] Destroyed context for
extension
  extension id: 
  effective extension id: 
[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:script_context.cc(118)] Destroyed context for
extension
  extension id: 
  effective extension id: 
[1:1:0621/210853:VERBOSE1:script_context.cc(118)] Destroyed context for
extension
  extension id: 
  effective extension id: 
Received signal 11 SEGV_MAPERR 0008
#0 0x7f4afd5dc4ae base::debug::StackTrace::StackTrace()
#1 0x7f4afd5dc8bb 
#2 0x7f4aecc2ec30 
#3 0x7f4aeec7a0e0 
#4 0x7f4aeec7a317 
#5 0x7f4aeec7a5c1 
#6 0x7f4aeec6c6fc 
#7 0x7f4aeec284c5 
#8 0x7f4aeed1e804 
#9 0x7f4aeed3bcf1 
#10 0x7f4aeed427a1 
#11 0x7f4aeed42ad6 
#12 0x7f4aeed61e17 
#13 0x7f4aeed0c71d 
#14 0x7f4aeed49f68 
#15 0x7f4aeed56682 
#16 0x7f4aeecc8997 
#17 0x7f4aeeccb292 
#18 0x158bed40961b 
  r8:   r9:  r10:  r11:
0246
 r12: 0419a3c6a310 r13:  r14: 7f4aef337e38 r15:
0419a3c48020
  di: 0419a3c48be0  si: 0419a3bbe440  bp: 0419a3bf3000  bx:
0419a3bef1b0
  dx: 0419a3c48cb0  ax:   cx: 20d75530  sp:
7ffeafbacb90
  ip: 7f4aeec7a0e0 efl: 00010246 cgf: 0033 erf:
0006
 trp: 000e msk:  cr2: 0008
[end of stack trace]

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346407] Review Request: stress-ng - Stress test a computer system in various ways

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407



--- Comment #3 from Simone Caronni  ---
> [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>  Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>  found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)",
>  "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output
>  of licensecheck in /home/slaanesh/Downloads/stress-ng/licensecheck.txt

This is ok, but please ask upstream to include the proper headers in the files.

> [!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
> [!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
> [!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
>  Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in stress-
>  ng-debuginfo

> Checking: stress-ng-debuginfo-0.06.06-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
> stress-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources

This is all related to the fact that the package ships with its own compiler
flags in the Makefile:

CFLAGS += -Wall -Wextra -DVERSION='"$(VERSION)"' -O2

You can probably just fix it by export the macro generated compiler flags,
something like this:

%build
export CFLAGS=%{optflags}
make %{?_smp_mflags}

This should also generate binaries with debugging symbols that can then be
later in the build stripped and the result used for debuginfo packages.

If the all/extra/02 flags create confusion just run sed in the %prep section.

Extra stuff:

- Group is not needed, unless you plan to build also for epel-5.
- You can substitute more stress-ng with %{name} (up to you..)
- Please sort BuildRequires.

There are a lot of additional compilation options that are available in the
Makefile:

 HAVE_APPARMOR
 HAVE_KEYUTILS_H
 HAVE_XATTR_H
 HAVE_LIB_BSD
 HAVE_LIB_Z
 HAVE_LIB_CRYPT
 HAVE_LIB_RT
 HAVE_LIB_PTHREAD
 HAVE_FLOAT_DECIMAL
 HAVE_SECCOMP_H
 HAVE_LIB_AIO
 HAVE_SYS_CAP_H
 HAVE_VECMATH

Maybe it's worth investing some more time into it to enable some additional
features.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346407] Review Request: stress-ng - Stress test a computer system in various ways

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407



--- Comment #2 from Simone Caronni  ---
Rpmlint
---
Checking: stress-ng-0.06.06-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
  stress-ng-debuginfo-0.06.06-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
  stress-ng-0.06.06-1.fc23.src.rpm
stress-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
---
Checking: stress-ng-debuginfo-0.06.06-1.fc23.x86_64.rpm
stress-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)

sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
stress-ng-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources
2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings.



Requires

stress-ng (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2()(64bit)
libaio.so.1()(64bit)
libaio.so.1(LIBAIO_0.1)(64bit)
libaio.so.1(LIBAIO_0.4)(64bit)
libbsd.so.0()(64bit)
libbsd.so.0(LIBBSD_0.0)(64bit)
libbsd.so.0(LIBBSD_0.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libcrypt.so.1()(64bit)
libm.so.6()(64bit)
libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
librt.so.1()(64bit)
libz.so.1()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)

stress-ng-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):



Provides

stress-ng:
stress-ng
stress-ng(x86-64)

stress-ng-debuginfo:
stress-ng-debuginfo
stress-ng-debuginfo(x86-64)



Source checksums

http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~cking/tarballs/stress-ng/stress-ng-0.06.06.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
cc58c8fd63490b20c8313c47c30ecb1543a0abd092b09bc9011c161b1a2c0e50
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
cc58c8fd63490b20c8313c47c30ecb1543a0abd092b09bc9011c161b1a2c0e50


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -r -b 1346407
Buildroot used: fedora-23-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346407] Review Request: stress-ng - Stress test a computer system in various ways

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407

Simone Caronni  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Simone Caronni  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)",
 "Unknown or generated". 2 files have unknown license. Detailed output
 of licensecheck in /home/slaanesh/Downloads/stress-ng/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[!]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[!]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[!]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in stress-
 ng-debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Neil Horman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(rick.tierney@inte
   ||l.com)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1288886] Review Request: python-portalocker - Library to provide an easy API to file locking

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1288886] Review Request: python-portalocker - Library to provide an easy API to file locking

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-portalocker-0.5.6-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a31c198e2f

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #54 from Rick Tierney  ---
I see! Yes I do have /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui under %files... so that's why
the duplicates. I will revise this and try again. Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #53 from Doug Ledford  ---
(In reply to Rick Tierney from comment #52)
> Neil:
> 
> Now that you have run the review (which seems slightly different from the
> way I do), I can see where some things are wrong and some things I'm not
> sure why they're being flagged:
> 
> 1. - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
>  Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui/LICENSE
> The "LICENSE" file appears on the install line and the %license line,
> but I don't see that as a duplicate when I run the review - is that
> wrong?

> 4. [! ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
>  Spec file should mark the readme and third-party-readme as %doc
>  I played with this before and kept getting warnings about file
> duplication. Maybe I can mark these with the %doc macro and they will get
> installed without using the "install" command. I can try that.

This is the same issue: you have a minor misconception about the error message
about files being listed more than once.  The problem is that you have the
files listed individually in the RPM via the %doc or other macro like that,
then you also have them getting found by glob in the %files section of the main
package.  Most likely your %files includes /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui as a
directory, which then pulls in all files in that directory, and as a result any
files under there that are also listed in things like %doc macros will now be
listed in two places and then you get the warning.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1288886] Review Request: python-portalocker - Library to provide an easy API to file locking

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126



--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-portalocker

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344249] Review Request: libtaskotron - Taskotron Support Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344249



--- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libtaskotron

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348298] Review Request: libXfont2 - X11 font support library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348298



--- Comment #3 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libXfont2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #52 from Rick Tierney  ---

Neil:

Now that you have run the review (which seems slightly different from the way I
do), I can see where some things are wrong and some things I'm not sure why
they're being flagged:

1. - Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
 Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui/LICENSE
The "LICENSE" file appears on the install line and the %license line, but I
don't see that as a duplicate when I run the review - is that wrong?

2. License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 This one is important, and I forgot to change it!  Now that we are no
longer distributing 3rd party libraries (except for Gritty, which is LGPL)
shouldn't we only list the licenses for opa-fmgui and gritty?  If that's the
case then the License tag should say BSD and LGPL.

3.[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
 This is asking you to put a comment in the code under the files section to
ennumerate which binaries get which license. Though I think opa-fmgui is the
only relevant one here, and it has code from all three licenses, no?
 I put a comment right above the License: tag stating that a license
break-down can be found in the file THIRD-PARTY-README. The MIT license was for
SLF4J and MBassador which are no longer included in our package. So it sounds
like this comment needs to move under the %file section and maybe it's only
relevant to gritty since that's the only one being built and included here. Not
sure! I thought it would be more complete if the THIRD-PARTY-README file
contained a license breakdown of ALL the libraries we are using.

4. [! ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 Spec file should mark the readme and third-party-readme as %doc
 I played with this before and kept getting warnings about file
duplication. Maybe I can mark these with the %doc macro and they will get
installed without using the "install" command. I can try that.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #51 from Neil Horman  ---

Looks pretty good, a few minor nits and I think we're good to go.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
  Note: warning: File listed twice: /usr/share/java/opa-fmgui/LICENSE
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DuplicateFiles
- This seems like a Java package, please install fedora-review-plugin-java
  to get additional checks


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (3 clause) MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown
 or generated", "LGPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)". 49
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/nhorman/1323186-opa-fmgui/licensecheck.txt
 Spec file indicates that your license is:
GPLv2 and LGPLv2+ and MIT and BSD
But the license check on the code doesn't include MIT licensed bits.  Can you
either remove the MIT bit here, or point out what I'm missing? :)

[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
 must be documented in the spec.
 This is asking you to put a comment in the code under the files section to
ennumerate which binaries get which license. Though I think opa-fmgui is the
only relevant one here, and it has code from all three licenses, no?

[x ]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /etc/xdg/menus,
 /etc/profile.d, /etc/xdg/menus/applications-merged
[x ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/icons/hicolor
 (hicolor-icon-theme, fedora-logos)
[x ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x ]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x ]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[! ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
 Spec file should mark the readme and third-party-readme as %doc

[x ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x ]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[- ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[- ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x ]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
 contains icons.
 Note: icons in opa-fmgui
[x ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
 desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large 

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Rick Tierney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(robert.amato@inte |
   |l.com)  |
   |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
   |m) needinfo?|
   |needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co |
   |m)  |



--- Comment #50 from Rick Tierney  ---
I tried to run fedora-review -b 1323186, but it couldn't find the SRPM URL. But
if you can run it, that's fine!

Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #49 from Neil Horman  ---
I'm not sure what problem you ran into but its working fine for me.  I've
closed your new bz as a dup of this one, and will continue the review here

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348668] Review Request: opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm - Intel Omni-Path FMGUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348668

Neil Horman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||nhor...@redhat.com
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Last Closed||2016-06-21 13:51:00



--- Comment #1 from Neil Horman  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1323186 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #48 from Neil Horman  ---
*** Bug 1348668 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1330861] Review Request: numix-icon-theme-circle - Numix Project circle icon theme

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330861

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-06-21 13:32:11



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1330858] Review Request: numix-icon-theme - Numix Project icon theme

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330858

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-06-21 13:31:24



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1330856] Review Request: numix-gtk-theme - Numix Gtk Theme

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1330856

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2016-06-21 13:30:09



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186

Rick Tierney  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(nhor...@redhat.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #47 from Rick Tierney  ---
Neil:

I tried to run the fedora-review using the information above in this BZ. It
reported back an error saying "Cannot find source rpm URL".

Since that didn't work, I made a new request (and consequently new BZ) using
this link: 

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora=fedora-review

Looks like I can't run the review using the BZ from here, so the new BZ is:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348668

Rick

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1343208] Review Request: xfce4-hotcorner-plugin - XFCE4 HotCorner Panel Plugin

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343208



--- Comment #5 from William Moreno  ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/davideoli/packages/raw/master/xfce4-hotcorner-plugin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://github.com/davideoli/packages/raw/master/xfce4-hotcorner-plugin-0.0.2-1.fc23.src.rpm

Please always use the Spec URL and SRPM URL format, with informal reviews I
mean than you look at others reviews request and make some comments on.

You can see some examples in Jeremy Cline informal reviews here:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Williamjmorenor/reviews

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1288886] Review Request: python-portalocker - Library to provide an easy API to file locking

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=126

William Moreno  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #11 from William Moreno  ---
Package aproved
===

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348668] New: Review Request: opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm - Intel Omni-Path FMGUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348668

Bug ID: 1348668
   Summary: Review Request: opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm -
Intel Omni-Path FMGUI
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: rick.tier...@intel.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui.spec

SRPM URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm

Description: The opa-fmgui is a Java GUI for the Intel Omni-Path Architecture
computing fabric

Fedora Account System Username: rjtierne

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1323186] Review Request: opa-fmgui - Intel OPA Fabric GUI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1323186



--- Comment #46 from Rick Tierney  ---
Spec URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui.spec

SRPM URL:
https://github.com/01org/opa-fmgui/releases/download/v1.4/opa-fmgui-10.0.0.0.3-4.fc25.src.rpm

Description: The opa-fmgui is a Java GUI for the Intel Omni-Path Architecture
computing fabric

Fedora Account System Username: rjtierne

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1336168] Review Request: git-lfs - Git extension for versioning large files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336168

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(sspreitz@redhat.c
   ||om)



--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
(In reply to Sascha Spreitzer from comment #1)
> Hi Igor
> 
> I will be reviewing your request.
It's good, what about other packages? ;)
> 
> Kind regards
> Sascha

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(tre...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #4 from Tomas Repik  ---
As does the Whiteboard say, the package is still not ready for review. It
should be though, approximately at the end of June.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1341272




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341272
[Bug 1341272] undefined symbol: sigar_skip_token
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1316526] Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316526



--- Comment #3 from Kenjiro Nakayama  ---
Thank you, Sascha!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1336168] Review Request: git-lfs - Git extension for versioning large files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336168

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||sspre...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sspre...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Sascha Spreitzer  ---
Hi Igor

I will be reviewing your request.

Kind regards
Sascha

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sspre...@redhat.com,
   ||tre...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo+
   ||needinfo?(tre...@redhat.com
   ||)



--- Comment #3 from Sascha Spreitzer  ---
Review state NEEDINFO

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1316526] Review Request: jo - Command-line to create JSON objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1316526

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||sspre...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|sspre...@redhat.com



--- Comment #2 from Sascha Spreitzer  ---
Hi Kenjiro

I will be reviewing this package.

Kind regards
Sascha

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1346407] Review Request: stress-ng - Stress test a computer system in various ways

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346407

Sascha Spreitzer  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344249] Review Request: libtaskotron - Taskotron Support Library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344249

Adam Miller  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Adam Miller  ---
Apologies for the delay on this, all previous requests to be resolved have
been.

APPROVED.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1334894] Review Request: python-sync2jira - Sync pagure and github issues to jira, via fedmsg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334894

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1334894] Review Request: python-sync2jira - Sync pagure and github issues to jira, via fedmsg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334894



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-sync2jira-0.2-4.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-70e77829f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1218758] Review Request: flmsg - Fast Light Message Amateur Radio Forms Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758



--- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System  ---
flmsg-3.00.00-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-25e1a23b79

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1218758] Review Request: flmsg - Fast Light Message Amateur Radio Forms Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1218758] Review Request: flmsg - Fast Light Message Amateur Radio Forms Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1218758



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
flmsg-3.00.00-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1d636db0c5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1334894] Review Request: python-sync2jira - Sync pagure and github issues to jira, via fedmsg

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1334894



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-sync2jira

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344245] Review Request: vex - Tool for executing commands in Python virtualenv without activate/ deactivate it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344245



--- Comment #5 from Lumír Balhar  ---
Thanks for the review.

Fixed:
- Hardcoded name replaced with %{name} macro in specfile
- Added separated source for license file

Problem:
- Github and PyPI have different content and releases. PyPI package doesn't
contain tests and LICENSE file but it has newer release. I tried to sync this
two sources in cooperation with the upstream developer but without success
(really unpleasant reply).

New files:
SPEC: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18896889/RH/vex.spec
SRPM: https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/18896889/RH/vex-0.0.18-1.fc24.src.rpm

Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14592224

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348207] Review Request: python-represent - create __repr__ automatically or declaratively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348207



--- Comment #4 from Dominika Krejčí  ---
Thank you for the review and other comments. I've made some changes:

* modified source URL
* added tests and it's BuildRequires
* specified %{pythonX_sitelib} section in files

Spec URL:
https://dkrejci.fedorapeople.org/python-represent/python-represent.spec
SRPM URL:
https://dkrejci.fedorapeople.org/python-represent/python-represent-1.5.1-1.fc23.src.rpm

Koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14591902

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348207] Review Request: python-represent - create __repr__ automatically or declaratively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348207



--- Comment #3 from Lumír Balhar  ---
(In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #2)
> (In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1)
> > [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
> >  provide egg info.
> 
> Any reason why this is not [x]? Have you checked?

Sorry for my mistake. It is just typo. I checked it and RPMs contain correct
.egg-info dirs.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348207] Review Request: python-represent - create __repr__ automatically or declaratively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348207



--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok  ---
(In reply to Lumír Balhar from comment #1)
> [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
>  provide egg info.

Any reason why this is not [x]? Have you checked?


Also, Dominika, I strongly suggest against this in %files:

%{pythonX_sitelib}/*

Now we have no idea what can all get installed with this package, more explicit
list would make things more safe, something like this is always better:

%{pythonX_sitelib}/%{srcname}
%{pythonX_sitelib}/%{srcname}-%{version}-py?.?.egg-info

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348207] Review Request: python-represent - create __repr__ automatically or declaratively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348207

Miro Hrončok  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mhron...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lbal...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1344245] Review Request: vex - Tool for executing commands in Python virtualenv without activate/ deactivate it

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344245



--- Comment #4 from Miro Hrončok  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated

Package NOT APPROVED (yet)

Issues
==

Must


[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).

 (Using vex as filename/directory name at multiple locations, use %{name}
instead)


Should
--

[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.

[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.

 Upstream has tests, but this package does not. This is a should, but I
will not approve without it.

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 30720 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[!]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[!]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean 

[Bug 1329199] Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329199

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1324020 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache
Cassandra
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1341013] Review Request: compile-command-annotations - Hotspot compile command annotations

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341013

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks|1324020 |




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020
[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache
Cassandra
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On|1329199, 1341013|




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1329199
[Bug 1329199] Review Request: concurrent-trees - Concurrent Trees for Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1341013
[Bug 1341013] Review Request: compile-command-annotations - Hotspot compile
command annotations
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348207] Review Request: python-represent - create __repr__ automatically or declaratively

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348207

Lumír Balhar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||lbal...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Lumír Balhar  ---
Hello.

Everything in your new package looks good to me except one thing - tests.

Upstream contains working tests. Is there any reason for omitting tests in the
package?

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
===
- Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided
  in the spec URL.
  Note: Upstream MD5sum check error, diff is in
  /home/lbalhar/Review/1348207-python-represent/diff.txt
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/SourceURL


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause) MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 20
 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/lbalhar/Review/1348207-python-represent/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-represent , python3-represent
[x]: Package 

[Bug 1347858] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf - Converts AsciiDoc documents to PDF using Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347858



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347856] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-table - Provides tables for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347856

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347857] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-templates - Prawn:: Templates allows using PDFs as templates in Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347857] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-templates - Prawn:: Templates allows using PDFs as templates in Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347854] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-manual_builder - A tool for writing manuals for Prawn and Prawn accessories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347854



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347854] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-manual_builder - A tool for writing manuals for Prawn and Prawn accessories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347854

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347853] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-icon - Provides icon fonts for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347853



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347852] Review Request: rubygem-css_parser - Ruby CSS parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347852



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347854] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-manual_builder - A tool for writing manuals for Prawn and Prawn accessories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347854



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347855] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-svg - SVG renderer for Prawn PDF library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347855



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347857] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-templates - Prawn:: Templates allows using PDFs as templates in Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347857



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347856] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-table - Provides tables for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347856



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc24 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc24 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc24 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc24
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-3002f036fc

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347853] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-icon - Provides icon fonts for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347853

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347858] Review Request: rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf - Converts AsciiDoc documents to PDF using Prawn

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347858



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347855] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-svg - SVG renderer for Prawn PDF library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347855

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347855] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-svg - SVG renderer for Prawn PDF library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347855



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1347856] Review Request: rubygem-prawn-table - Provides tables for PrawnPDF

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1347856



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf-1.5.0-0.1.alpha.11.fc23 rubygem-prawn-icon-1.1.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-svg-0.25.1-1.fc23 rubygem-css_parser-1.4.2-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-table-0.2.2-1.fc23 rubygem-prawn-manual_builder-0.2.0-1.fc23
rubygem-prawn-templates-0.0.4-1.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f072509871

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org