[Bug 1358041] Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041
--- Comment #5 from Antonio Trande ---
Package review:
[x] The package must be named according to the Package Naming Guidelines .
[x] The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption.
[x] The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines.
[x] The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and meet the
Licensing Guidelines.
[x] The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
[-] If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in
its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %license.
[x] The spec file must be written in American English. [5]
[x] The spec file for the package MUST be legible. [6]
[x] The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
[x] The package MUST successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture.
[-] If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch MUST have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number MUST be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line.
[x] All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ; inclusion of
those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[-] The spec file MUST handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.
[-] Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files
(not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call
ldconfig in %post and %postun.
[x] Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[-] If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this
fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation
of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is considered a
blocker.
[x] A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create a
directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create that
directory.
[x] A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)
[!] Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example.
[x] Each package must consistently use macros.
[x] The package must contain code, or permissible content.
[-] Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition of
large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity)
[-] If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime of
the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run properly
if it is not present.
[x] Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[-] Development files must be in a -devel package.
In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package
using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
[-] Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
[-] Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop file,
and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your explanation.
[x] Packages must not own files or directories already owned by other packages.
The rule of thumb here is that the first package to be installed should own the
files or directories that other packages may rely upon. This means, for
example, that no package in Fedora should ever share ownership with any of the
files or directories owned by the filesystem or man package. If you feel that
you have a good reason to own a file or directory that another package owns,
then please present that at package review time.
[x] All filenames in rpm packages must be valid UTF-8.
[-] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file
from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[-] The description and summary sections in the package spec file should
contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if
[Bug 1358041] Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041 --- Comment #6 from Antonio Trande --- Created attachment 1183062 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1183062&action=edit rpmlint output of python3-scipy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358041] Review Request: python3-scipy - Scientific Tools for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358041 --- Comment #7 from Antonio Trande --- Created attachment 1183063 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1183063&action=edit rpmlint output of python3-scipy-debuginfo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1356739] Review Request: zulucrypt - Qt GUI front end to cryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739 --- Comment #13 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9) > report this notice > > /* > * This routine is part of libc. We include it nevertheless, > * since the libc version has some security flaws. > * > * TODO: use canonicalize_file_name() when exist in glibc > */ > zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-cli/lib/canonicalize/canonicalize.c > > > zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-cli/lib/canonicalize/canonicalize.h https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt/issues/41 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1356739] Review Request: zulucrypt - Qt GUI front end to cryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739 --- Comment #14 from gil cattaneo --- (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #13) > (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #9) > > report this notice > > > > /* > > * This routine is part of libc. We include it nevertheless, > > * since the libc version has some security flaws. > > * > > * TODO: use canonicalize_file_name() when exist in glibc > > */ > > zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-cli/lib/canonicalize/canonicalize.c > > > > > > zuluCrypt-5.0.0/zuluCrypt-cli/lib/canonicalize/canonicalize.h > > https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt/issues/41 perhaps, it would not be enough to add Provides: bundled(glibc) or what is ... also for this and should update license field -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352042] Review Request: perl-Specio - Type constraints and coercions for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352042 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Specio-0.24-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-81706dac20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352042] Review Request: perl-Specio - Type constraints and coercions for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352042 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359110] Review Request: xreader - Simple document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann ---
I've fixed the scriptlet paths and some dierectory ownerships. It's somewhat
strange: The caja and nemo packages provides directories for
%{_libdir}/[caja,nemo]/extensions-[2,3].0/ but not for
%{_datadir}/[caja,nemo]/extensions/. Maybe we should add them to those
packages?
New files:
Spec URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xreader.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xreader-1.0.7-2.fc24.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1354210] Review Request: xviewer - Fast and functional graphics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359390 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359390 [Bug 1359390] Cinnamon X-apps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358699] Review Request: xed - A small and lightweight text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358699 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359390 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359390 [Bug 1359390] Cinnamon X-apps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359110] Review Request: xreader - Simple document viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359110 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359390 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359390 [Bug 1359390] Cinnamon X-apps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1354210] Review Request: xviewer - Fast and functional graphics viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359392 (xviewer-plugins) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359392 [Bug 1359392] Review Request: xviewer-plugins - A collection of plugins for xviewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359392] New: Review Request: xviewer-plugins - A collection of plugins for xviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359392 Bug ID: 1359392 Summary: Review Request: xviewer-plugins - A collection of plugins for xviewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xviewer-plugins.spec SRPM URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xviewer-plugins-1.0.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: This package contains plugins for additional features in xviewer. Fedora Account System Username: mariobl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359392] Review Request: xviewer-plugins - A collection of plugins for xviewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359392 Mario Blättermann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359390 Depends On||1354210 (xviewer) Alias||xviewer-plugins Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354210 [Bug 1354210] Review Request: xviewer - Fast and functional graphics viewer https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359390 [Bug 1359390] Cinnamon X-apps -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1332306] Review Request: libcxxabi - Low level support for a standard C++ library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332306
--- Comment #3 from Mario Blättermann ---
%{_libdir}/libc++abi.a is in the -devel package. Shouldn't this go in a
separate -static package?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358699] Review Request: xed - A small and lightweight text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358699 --- Comment #1 from Mario Blättermann --- I've fixed some issues, such as missing scriptlet paths and the license of the user manual. Spec URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/xed.spec SRPM URL: https://mariobl.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/xed-1.0.5-3.fc24.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1358699] Review Request: xed - A small and lightweight text editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1358699 --- Comment #2 from Mario Blättermann --- New scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14992112 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359397] New: Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Fork of libqtelegram by Aseman Team
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359397 Bug ID: 1359397 Summary: Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Fork of libqtelegram by Aseman Team Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/libqtelegram-ae.git/plain/libqtelegram-ae.spec?id=241ba02c8ca7605734f628b20d7732fc4a303f53 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00409656-libqtelegram-ae/libqtelegram-ae-10.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm Description: Fork of libqtelegram by Aseman Team. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359399] Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions , used in the aseman's projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||aseman-qt-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359399] New: Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions, used in the aseman' s projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399 Bug ID: 1359399 Summary: Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions, used in the aseman's projects Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/aseman-qt-tools.git/plain/aseman-qt-tools.spec?id=2894ffaa6043a2f509e4c35da2f8e97c9e3c8ab6 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00410364-aseman-qt-tools/aseman-qt-tools-1.0.0-2.fc25.src.rpm Description: Shared tools and functions, used in the aseman's projects. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] New: Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Bug ID: 1359400 Summary: Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/telegramqml.git/plain/telegramqml.spec?id=81803045af1bd1ac3a8de997350834b11962840b SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00410323-telegramqml/telegramqml-2.0.0-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||he...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- *** Bug 1246762 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246762] Review Request: telegramqml - Qt Qml qtelegram wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246762 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ignate...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2016-07-23 14:28:21 --- Comment #4 from Igor Gnatenko --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1359400 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246762] Review Request: telegramqml - Qt Qml qtelegram wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246762 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Alias|telegramqml | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||telegramqml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1246761 (libqtelegram-ae) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761 [Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359400 (telegramqml) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 [Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||he...@kde.org --- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko --- *** Bug 1246763 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359401] New: Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 Bug ID: 1359401 Summary: Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/cutegram.git/plain/cutegram.spec?id=477d8c4832abccfb753c60c7054099b500e6f100 SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00410486-cutegram/cutegram-3.0-0.3git7294861.fc25.src.rpm Description: A different telegram client from Aseman team. Cutegram forked from Sigram by Sialan Labs. Cutegram project are released under the terms of the GPLv3 license. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246763] Review Request: cutegram - A Qt Qml based Telegram client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246763 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED CC||ignate...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Alias|cutegram| Last Closed||2016-07-23 14:31:24 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1359401 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||cutegram -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359401 (cutegram) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 [Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359399] Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions , used in the aseman's projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1359401 (cutegram) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 [Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1359400 (telegramqml), ||1359399 (aseman-qt-tools) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399 [Bug 1359399] Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions, used in the aseman's projects https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 [Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359402] New: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request )
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359402 Bug ID: 1359402 Summary: Review Request: coot - crystallographic macromolecular building toolkit (unretire request) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: tim.f...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3najl1NDBoVkc2ZUk SRPM URL: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BxOz1eBnQT3nTHRGcWFCMm5yMzA Description: This is a request to unretire coot for rawhide/F24 (there was an error on compilation that needed fixing, it just took me some time to track it down and add the patch - upstream has also been notified and future releases include the patch). Original review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472150 Coot is a toolkit for Macromolecular Crystallography and model-building. Coot uses OpenGL, together with a new approach to map contouring and importing/creation and other modelling and building operations. It displays maps and models and allows model manipulations such as idealization, real space refinement, manual rotation/translation, rigid-body fitting, ligand search, solvation, mutations, rotamers, Ramachandran plots... Also see: http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/personal/pemsley/coot/ Fedora Account System Username: timfenn -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1353343] Review Request: qmc2 - M.A.M.E. Catalog / Launcher II
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353343 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- qmc2-0.65-4.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1280054] Review Request: nodejs-array-reduce - `[].reduce() ` for old browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280054 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2016-07-01 21:00:14 |2016-07-23 14:49:45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1280054] Review Request: nodejs-array-reduce - `[].reduce() ` for old browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280054 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-array-reduce-0.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279981] Review Request: nodejs-array-filter - Array#filter for older browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279981 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2016-07-03 08:53:29 |2016-07-23 14:49:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279981] Review Request: nodejs-array-filter - Array#filter for older browsers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279981 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-array-filter-1.0.0-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1273134] Review Request: nodejs-tmatch - acilitate the `t.match() ` method in `tap`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273134 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- nodejs-tmatch-2.0.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1273134] Review Request: nodejs-tmatch - acilitate the `t.match() ` method in `tap`
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1273134 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2016-07-01 20:13:01 |2016-07-23 14:50:02 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359399] Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions , used in the aseman's projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lupi...@mailbox.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupi...@mailbox.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- libqtelegram-ae-10.0.0-2.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-b83952c941 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359399] Review Request: aseman-qt-tools - Shared tools and functions , used in the aseman's projects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359399
Christian Dersch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Christian Dersch ---
Looks nice => Approved!
One point you should have a look at: The permissions in debuginfo reported by
rpmlint, maybe permissions of sources are weird.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "LGPL (v2.1)", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3
or later)", "Unknown or generated". 186 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/review/1359399-aseman-qt-
tools/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in aseman-
qt-tools-debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists
[Bug 1246761] Review Request: libqtelegram-ae - Qt Telegram API wrapper library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246761 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- libqtelegram-ae-10.0.0-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f124196a0d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359400] Review Request: telegramqml - Telegram API tools for QtQml and Qml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359400 Christian Dersch changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||lupi...@mailbox.org Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupi...@mailbox.org Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1270405] Review Request: native_client - Google Native Client Toolchain
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1270405 --- Comment #12 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- Created attachment 1183147 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1183147&action=edit log from failed build in fedora-24-x86_64 mock Seems to fail in the same way: Running: subprocess.check_call(['/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-gcc', '-mcpu=cortex-a9', '-D__arm_nonsfi_linux__', '-I/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include/', '-O2', '-Wall', '-Werror', '-I../../../..', '-DNACL_LINUX=1', '-DDEFINE_MAIN', '-c', '../../../src/nonsfi/irt/irt_interfaces.c', '-o', '../unsandboxed_runtime_arm_linux_install/translator/arm-linux/lib/unsandboxed_irt.o'], cwd='/builddir/build/BUILD/native_client/toolchain_build/out/unsandboxed_runtime_arm_linux_work') ../../../src/nonsfi/irt/irt_interfaces.c:7:20: fatal error: assert.h: No such file or directory #include ^ compilation terminated. Error building unsandboxed_runtime_arm_linux: Command '['/usr/bin/arm-linux-gnu-gcc', '-mcpu=cortex-a9', '-D__arm_nonsfi_linux__', '-I/usr/arm-linux-gnu/include/', '-O2', '-Wall', '-Werror', '-I../../../..', '-DNACL_LINUX=1', '-DDEFINE_MAIN', '-c', '../../../src/nonsfi/irt/irt_interfaces.c', '-o', '../unsandboxed_runtime_arm_linux_install/translator/arm-linux/lib/unsandboxed_irt.o']' returned non-zero exit status 1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359401] Review Request: cutegram - Cutegram is a telegram client by Aseman Land
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359401 --- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko --- SPEC: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/cutegram.git/plain/cutegram.spec?id=18d4250bdb4d7612bbfc9ae2b762ac5ac89dbde7 SRPM: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/ignatenkobrain/cutegram/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00410657-cutegram/cutegram-3.0-0.4git7294861.fc25.src.rpm Added missing Requires -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1353343] Review Request: qmc2 - M.A.M.E. Catalog / Launcher II
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353343 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- qmc2-0.65-4.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1353343] Review Request: qmc2 - M.A.M.E. Catalog / Launcher II
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353343 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2016-07-23 16:49:05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1356739] Review Request: zulucrypt - Qt GUI front end to cryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment|0 |1 #1180782 is|| obsolete|| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1356739] Review Request: zulucrypt - Qt GUI front end to cryptsetup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1356739 Raphael Groner changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||NotReady --- Comment #15 from Raphael Groner --- (In reply to gil cattaneo from comment #14) … > > https://github.com/mhogomchungu/zuluCrypt/issues/41 > > perhaps, it would not be enough to add Provides: bundled(glibc) or what is > ... > also for this and should update license field There's a patch now to use external glibc function. I'll apply it. (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #12) > Created attachment 1180782 [details] > unbundle lxqtwallet > > Unbundle lxqt-wallet. > > Patch got from upstream. This patch is incomplete. I wrote an e-mail to upstream to get it working with 'rm -r zuluCrypt-gui/lxqt_wallet'. (In reply to Raphael Groner from comment #11) … > 1. It is currently not possible to use upstream version of tcplay with > zuluCrypt. Upstream seems to have lost interest in the project and i > have extended my "personal" copy of the library in incompatible ways. > For example,upstream version does not have this[2] pull request but my > copy has it.My copy extended this pull request to add unlocking > VeraCrypt volumes that uses a PIM value.A bunch of APIs like this[3] > one are also not in the upstream version. Upstream seems uninterested > in the project and i have not attempted to offer them upstream because > of it. We've to discuss that with the maintainer of the tcplay package. Maybe we can add the patches and fully unbundle from the zuluCrypt package. > 2. It should be possible to cleanly unbundle "lxqt_wallet" since > zuluCrypt only uses lxqt_wallet documented API.Will add a config > option shortly to build using an external version. See above. > 3. If you dont want to have zulu*-cli CLI components as suid-root > binaries(offers best user experience in my opinion),look at what > debian[4] is doing to have the second best user experience. With the > "debian way",a user clicks an icon and they get a polkit prompt to > root authenticate before they start the application with root's > privileges but they still wont be able to do everything since the user > that > invokes the application is remembered and the application will do only > what that user is allowed to do.This is done through pkexec[5]. IMHO that should be handled in another package review for zulucrypt-pkexec (or the like) because it's a new upstream. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359412] New: Review Request: gawkextlib - library providing support functions for gawk extension libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412 Bug ID: 1359412 Summary: Review Request: gawkextlib - library providing support functions for gawk extension libraries Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ajsch...@alumni.princeton.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/rpms/gawkextlib.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/rpms/gawkextlib-1.0.2-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: gawkextlib is a library providing helpful support functions for gawk extension libraries. Fedora Account System Username: ajschorr This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. I am the upstream maintainer of the gawkextlib project. This project provides a number of extension libraries for gawk, including XML, postgresql, lmdb, and select I/O multiplexing. The koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14994986 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359412] Review Request: gawkextlib - library providing support functions for gawk extension libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359412 Andrew Schorr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359416] New: Review Request: gawk-xml - XML support for gawk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416 Bug ID: 1359416 Summary: Review Request: gawk-xml - XML support for gawk Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ajsch...@alumni.princeton.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/rpms/gawk-xml.spec SRPM URL: http://sourceforge.net/projects/gawkextlib/files/rpms/gawk-xml-1.0.4-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: The gawk-xml package contains the gawk XML shared library extension, as well as the xmlgawk script and some awk include libraries for enhanced XML processing. Fedora Account System Username: ajschorr This is my first package, and I need a sponsor. I am the upstream package maintainer. This is a shared library gawk extension that uses the expat library to enable gawk to process XML files. The koji build is here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=14995194 It currently fails because it requires the gawkextlib package that I just submitted in bugzilla # 1359412 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359416] Review Request: gawk-xml - XML support for gawk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359416 Andrew Schorr changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352042] Review Request: perl-Specio - Type constraints and coercions for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352042 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Specio-0.24-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-81706dac20 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352175] Review Request: gap-pkg-float - GAP access to mpfr, mpfi, mpc, fplll and cxsc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352175 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- gap-pkg-float-0.7.4-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-49d0bb5c71 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1131019] Review Request: lejos-nxj - Run Java on the Lego NXT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1131019 Omar Berroteran changed: What|Removed |Added CC||omarberroteran...@gmail.com --- Comment #4 from Omar Berroteran --- The build fails in RawHide and Fedora 24. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359426] New: Review Request: nodejs-clap - Command line argument parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359426 Bug ID: 1359426 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-clap - Command line argument parser Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-clap/nodejs-clap.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-clap/nodejs-clap-1.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: Command line argument parser Fedora Account System Username: jsmith -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359426] Review Request: nodejs-clap - Command line argument parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359426 Jared Smith changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||956806 (nodejs-reviews), ||1269538 (IoT), 1031982 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031982 [Bug 1031982] nodejs-tap-6.2.0 is available https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1269538 [Bug 1269538] Tracker for IoT on Fedora -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1359473] New: Review Request: legendsbrowser - Java-based legends viewer for Dwarf Fortress
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359473 Bug ID: 1359473 Summary: Review Request: legendsbrowser - Java-based legends viewer for Dwarf Fortress Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: rosser@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/fedora/legendsbrowser.spec SRPM URL: https://www.acm.jhu.edu/~bjr/fedora/dwarffortress/fedora/legendsbrowser-1.0.12-1.fc23.src.rpm Description: Legends Browser is an multi-platform, open source, java-based legends viewer for Dwarf Fortress. It works in the browser of your choice and recreates Legends Mode, with objects accessible as links. Several statistics and overviews are added. Fedora Account System Username: tc01 rpmlint output: $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/legendsbrowser-1.0.12-1.fc23.noarch.rpm legendsbrowser.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti legendsbrowser.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary legendsbrowser $ rpmlint ../RPMS/noarch/legendsbrowser-javadoc-1.0.12-1.fc23.noarch.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. $ rpmlint ../SRPMS/legendsbrowser-1.0.12-1.fc23.src.rpm legendsbrowser.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US multi -> mulch, mufti -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157255] Review Request: ufoai - UFO: Alien Invasion strategy game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157255 Ben Rosser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rosser@gmail.com --- Comment #17 from Ben Rosser --- It looks like the font issue has been resolved-- does that mean this review can proceed? Are you in need of a reviewer? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1176277] Review Request: Shinobi - Meta build system for Ninja
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176277 Bug 1176277 depends on bug 1176420, which changed state. Bug 1176420 Summary: RFE: Help should be patched to use right command name https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176420 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324267] Review Request: python-keyutils - Python3 bindings for the keyutils package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324267 --- Comment #2 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-keyutils/python-keyutils.spec SRPM URL: http://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-keyutils/python-keyutils-0.3-1.fc25.src.rpm OK, vhost was broken on that server and admins haven't responded yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1245022] Review Request: ghc-base-compat - A compatibility layer for base
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245022 --- Comment #4 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-base-compat/ghc-base-compat.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-base-compat/ghc-base-compat-0.9.1-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1245021] Review Request: ghc-mtl-compat - Backported Control.Monad.Except module from mtl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1245021 --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-mtl-compat/ghc-mtl-compat.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-mtl-compat/ghc-mtl-compat-0.2.1.3-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256057] Review Request: ghc-time-locale-compat - Compatibility of TimeLocale between old-locale and time-1.5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256057 --- Comment #5 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-time-locale-compat/ghc-time-locale-compat.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-time-locale-compat/ghc-time-locale-compat-0.1.1.3-2.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256091] Review Request: ghc-http-conduit - HTTP client package with conduit interface and HTTPS support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256091 --- Comment #3 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/ghc-http-conduit/ghc-http-conduit-2.1.10-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1256046] Review Request: eventd - A simple daemon to track remote or local events and do actions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1256046 --- Comment #14 from Ben Boeckel --- Spec URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/eventd/eventd.spec SRPM URL: https://mathstuf.fedorapeople.org/packaging/eventd/eventd-0.19.1-1.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
