[Bug 1377812] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx " blockdiag" extension

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Parag AN(पराग)  ---

Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed

Suggestions:
1) You may want to drop versioned BuildRequires or Requires, they should be
working from the existing packaged dependency versions.

2) Try to enable %check for both the subpackages.

= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (2 clause)", "*No copyright* BSD", "Unknown or generated".
 12 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/parag/1377812-python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.5/site-
 packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3
 -sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3
 -sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3-sphinxcontrib-bibtex),
 /usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/sphinxcontrib(python2-sphinxcontrib-
 spelling, python2-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python2-sphinxcontrib-
 bibtex, python-sphinxcontrib-cheeseshop, python-sphinxcontrib-
 httpdomain, python2-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python-sphinxcontrib-
 adadomain, python-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker), /usr/lib/python3.5
 /site-packages/sphinxcontrib/__pycache__(python3-sphinxcontrib-
 programoutput, python3-sphinxcontrib-seqdiag, python3-sphinxcontrib-
 fulltoc)

This looks fine as all these are independent extensions that are getting
installed under /usr/lib/pythonx.x/site-packages/sphinxcontrib

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local


[Bug 1377812] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx " blockdiag" extension

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812

Parag AN(पराग)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||panem...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|panem...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-nose2-0.6.5-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-de3d12ca85

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1373486] Review Request: python34 - Version 3.4 of the Python programming language

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486



--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok  ---
(In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #1)
> This should be easier though than python35. Anything else that I might be
> missing, in order to properly test the package?

I think this is going to be pretty straight forward, in case we are not missing
anything.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377876] Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377876

Paul Wouters  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pwout...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|pwout...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377877] New: Review Request: luksmeta - Utility for storing small metadata in the LUKSv1 header

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377877

Bug ID: 1377877
   Summary: Review Request: luksmeta - Utility for storing small
metadata in the LUKSv1 header
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: npmccal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/npmccallum/luksmeta/luksmeta.git/plain/luksmeta.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/npmccallum/luksmeta/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00446328-luksmeta/luksmeta-2-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Utility for storing small metadata in the LUKSv1 header
Fedora Account System Username: npmccallum

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Randy Barlow  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "BSL", "Unknown or generated". 170 files
 have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/rbarlow/reviews/1369534-libsass/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libsass-
 debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[x]: Description and 

[Bug 1377876] New: Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377876

Bug ID: 1377876
   Summary: Review Request: jose - Tools for JSON Object Signing
and Encryption (JOSE)
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: npmccal...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/npmccallum/jose/jose.git/plain/jose.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/npmccallum/jose/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00455561-jose/jose-3-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: Tools for JSON Object Signing and Encryption (JOSE)
Fedora Account System Username: npmccallum

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 977116] Review Request: pgmodeler - PostgreSQL Database Modeler

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977116



--- Comment #52 from Pavel Alexeev  ---
Add Requires shared-mime-info. hicolor-icon-theme already required.

> - For F25+, various scriptlets should not be run according to [1]. For F23, 
> F24 update-mime-database needs to be invoked in %post.

That already there:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/blob/master/SPECS/pgmodeler.spec#L81


Changes:
https://github.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/commit/ca4684e8f693b037c20988337abfea9ffd8faf67
Spec:
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Hubbitus/Fedora-packaging/ca4684e8f693b037c20988337abfea9ffd8faf67/SPECS/pgmodeler.spec
Srpm:
http://rpm.hubbitus.info/Fedora24/pgmodeler/pgmodeler-0.8.2-4.fc24.src.rpm
Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15723164

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1342839] Review Request: python-pycodestyle - Python style guide checker

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342839

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-flake8-import-order-0.9.2-1.fc25, python-pycodestyle-2.0.0-2.fc25 has
been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-dce2f89dec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374138] Review Request: vim-syntastic - A vim plugins to check syntax for programming languages

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374138

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System  ---
vim-syntastic-3.7.0-6.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f79b82727b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377228] Review Request: perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings - Fail if tests warn

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377228

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Test2-Plugin-NoWarnings-0.02-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e1d82b2619

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369244] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jsr310 - Add-on module to support JSR-310 ( Java 8 Date & Time API) data types

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369244

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
jackson-datatype-jsr310-2.7.6-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-79a8b90357

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369224] Review Request: jackson-modules-base - Jackson modules: Base

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369224

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
jackson-modules-base-2.7.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-a2a9677a7c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369232] Review Request: jackson-datatypes-collections - Jackson datatypes: collections

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369232

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
jackson-datatypes-collections-2.7.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-493a0cf1dd

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369248] Review Request: jackson-datatype-jdk8 - Add-on module for Jackson to support JDK 8 data types

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369248

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|RAWHIDE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
jackson-datatype-jdk8-2.7.6-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-eb91de5d24

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1357728] Review Request: libcint - general GTO integrals for quantum chemistry

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357728

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
libcint-2.8.7-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-8bdf95a798

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377252] Review Request: perl-Params-ValidationCompiler - Build an optimized subroutine parameter validator once , use it forever

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377252

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-Params-ValidationCompiler-0.13-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-04cc921d53

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1357724] Review Request: qcint - general GTO integrals for quantum chemistry

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357724

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System  ---
qcint-1.8.6-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-1fe321e1eb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1354113] Review Request: python-pytest-catchlog - py.test plugin to catch log messages ( fork of pytest-capturelog)

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1354113

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pytest-catchlog-1.2.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-42f09d7ea7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1310873] Review Request: rubygem-async_sinatra - A Sinatra plugin for running on async webservers

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1310873

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-async_sinatra-1.2.1-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-41326fc2f1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374035] Review Request: pimd - The original PIM-SM multicast routing daemon

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374035

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
pimd-2.3.2-3.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-5a2920fad0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1373486] Review Request: python34 - Version 3.4 of the Python programming language

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373486



--- Comment #1 from Charalampos Stratakis  ---
I plan to test it on Fedora 24 and Fedora 25.

Will need to check that the interpreters can work side by side without clashing
in any way, meaning firing up python shells and trying various things as well
as executing some basic scripts.

Upgrade paths should be clean (F24->F25, F25->F26) however I will test that,
just for consistency.

This should be easier though than python35. Anything else that I might be
missing, in order to properly test the package?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377733] Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance graphing tool

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ignate...@redhat.com



--- Comment #1 from Igor Gnatenko  ---
- Use %{_unitdir}
- Use %make_build
- Add special systemd macro in %post* triggers
- Use %{?systemd_requires}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1342063] Review Request: python-mongoquery - A python implementation of mongodb queries

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:06:55



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376207] Review Request: python-fedmsg-atomic-composer - Composes atomic trees when Fedora repositories are updated

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376207



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-fedmsg-atomic-composer-2016.2-2.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1360258] Review Request: qt5-qtserialbus - The Qt Serial Bus API

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
qt5-qtserialbus-5.7.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1342063] Review Request: python-mongoquery - A python implementation of mongodb queries

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342063



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-mongoquery-1.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1360258] Review Request: qt5-qtserialbus - The Qt Serial Bus API

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1360258

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:06:45



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376710] Review Request: python-packaging - Core utilities for Python packages

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376710

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2016-09-20 13:05:09



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376710] Review Request: python-packaging - Core utilities for Python packages

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376710



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-packaging-16.7-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1338339] Review Request: openrave - Open Robotics Automation Virtual Environment

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1338339

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||till.hofm...@posteo.de
  Flags||needinfo?(till.hofmann@post
   ||eo.de)



--- Comment #23 from Antonio Trande  ---
I guess that upstream needs more information about (build log is not accessible
anymore).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1350257] Review Request: petsc - Portable Extensible Toolkit for Scientific Computation

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1350257

Antonio Trande  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(d.love@liverpool.
   ||ac.uk)



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534

Aurelien Bompard  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(aurelien@bompard. |
   |org)|



--- Comment #4 from Aurelien Bompard  ---
Oops, fixed, thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1369534] Review Request: libsass - C/ C++ port of the Sass CSS precompiler

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1369534

Randy Barlow  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||needinfo?(aurelien@bompard.
   ||org)



--- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow  ---
Hey Aurelien!

The -devel subpackage still has the LICENSE in the %doc macro. Can you fix that
one too? Thanks!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377812] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag - Sphinx "blockdiag" extension

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377812

Bug ID: 1377812
   Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag -
Sphinx "blockdiag" extension
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jp...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag/python-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag-1.5.5-1.fc26.src.rpm
Description: A sphinx extension for embedding block diagram using blockdiag_.
Fedora Account System Username: jpena

Koji scratch build available at
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15719428

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-nose2-0.6.5-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-de3d12ca85

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377762] New: Review Request: opendht - A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377762

Bug ID: 1377762
   Summary: Review Request: opendht  - A lightweight C++11
Distributed Hash Table implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: benjamin.lef...@nwise.se
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://lef.fedorapeople.org/opendht.spec
SRPM URL: https://lef.fedorapeople.org/opendht-0.6.3-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: 
A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation originally based
on https://github.com/jech/dht by Juliusz Chroboczek.
 * Light and fast C++11 Kademlia DHT library.
 * Distributed shared key->value data-store
 * Clean and powerful distributed map API with storage of arbitrary binary
   values of up to 56 KB.
 * Optional public key cryptography layer providing data signature and
   encryption (using GnuTLS).
 * IPv4 and IPv6 support.
 * Python binding.

Fedora Account System Username: lef

KOJI: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=15717915

COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/lef/opendht/build/455451/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1353224] Review Request: python-tackerclient - Client for OpenStack tacker project

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353224



--- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-tackerclient

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377733] New: Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance graphing tool

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377733

Bug ID: 1377733
   Summary: Review Request: systemd-bootchart - Boot performance
graphing tool
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: f...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/systemd-bootchart.spec
SRPM URL:
https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/systemd-bootchart-231-1.fc24.src.rpm
Description: Boot performance graphing tool
Fedora Account System Username: fale

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1149176] Review Request: vdsm-jsonrpc-java - jsonrpc communication lib for ovirt

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1149176

automat...@ovirt.org changed:

   What|Removed |Added

External Bug ID||oVirt gerrit 63673



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1375926] Review Request: python-nose2 - Next generation of nicer testing for Python

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375926



--- Comment #15 from Jon Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-nose2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1372718] Review Request: rubygem-puma - A simple, fast, threaded, and highly concurrent HTTP 1.1 server

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372718



--- Comment #14 from Vít Ondruch  ---
(In reply to Jun Aruga from comment #11)
> (In reply to Vít Ondruch from comment #6)
> > * Purpose of Patch1?
> >   - Not sure about purpose of the Patch1, since if I comment it out and use
> > the previous commands, I can execute the test suite just fine => I
> > suggest
> > to drop this patch altogether.
> >   - You are right that upstream is inconsistent in this regard, but I'd say
> > that the particular require you are fixing is the way how the test 
> > suites
> > typically works, while the proposed fix is antipattern. IOW you should
> > propose fix fixing all the other files.
> 
> I thinks the Patch1 is needed.
> Because I got an error without the Patch1. It depends on the order of test.
> 
>  sh-4.3#
> RUBYOPT=-I.:lib:/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/
> puma-3.6.0 \
> >   ruby -r minitest/autorun -e 'Dir.glob "./test/test_http11.rb", 
> > (:require)' -- -v
> /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require':
> cannot load such file -- testhelp (LoadError)
>   from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in
> `require'
>   from
> /builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/share/gems/gems/puma-3.6.0/test/
> test_http11.rb:4:in `'
>   from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in
> `require'
>   from /usr/share/rubygems/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in
> `require'
>   from -e:1:in `glob'
>   from -e:1:in `'
> 
> 
> 
> When I add "-r test/testhelp", its test was passed.
> 
>  sh-4.3#
> RUBYOPT=-I.:lib:/builddir/build/BUILD/rubygem-puma-3.6.0/usr/lib64/gems/ruby/
> puma-3.6.0 \
> >   ruby -r minitest/autorun -r test/testhelp -e 'Dir.glob 
> > "./test/test_http11.rb", (:require)' -- -v
> ...
> 100% passed

Of course you are right in this case, but the scope of the issue is much
broader then you think. Please check these lines:

https://github.com/puma/puma/blob/master/test/testhelp.rb#L5-L8

You can see that the "." and "./test" gets on the load path at some point. So
you can then require either "testhelp" or "test/testhelp". The correct fix
would be to unify this, i.e. you should be able to do only "require 'testhelp'"
at the end, because this is how it is typically done nowadays. The "." should
not get on the load path at all.

IOW, you can keep it like this for the moment. But I'd suggest you to work with
upstream to make this consistent and up to date. This should be the start of
the upstream work:

```
find test -name '*.rb' -exec sed -i "s|test/testhelp|testhelp|" {} \;
```


Otherwise the changes looks reasonable. Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1370096] rubygem-celluloid-essentials - Internally used tools, and superstructural dependencies of Celluloid

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370096

Jun Aruga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||jar...@redhat.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jar...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374947] Review Request: vpcs - Virtual PC Simulator

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374947

Michal Ruprich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||mrupr...@redhat.com
 QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |mrupr...@redhat.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948

Michal Ruprich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948

Michal Ruprich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mrupr...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1377631] New: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-netspeed - A gnome-shell extension to show speed of the internet

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377631

Bug ID: 1377631
   Summary: Review Request: gnome-shell-extension-netspeed - A
gnome-shell extension to show speed of the internet
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: mgans...@alice.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0cfb4boq3dhclu9/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed.spec?dl=0
SRPM URL:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/qsc4khyihlxnm9h/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.src.rpm?dl=0

Description: Add an Internet speed indicator to status area.
Fedora Account System Username: martinkg

%changelog
* Fri Sep 16 2016 Martin Gansser  -
3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec
- Update to 3.20

rpmlint -i gnome-shell-extension-netspeed.spec
/home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.src.rpm
/home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/gnome-shell-extension-netspeed-3.20-1.20160806git16a25ec.fc24.noarch.rpm
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376900] Review Request: espeak-ng - eSpeak NG Text-to-Speech

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376900

Petr Menšík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pemen...@redhat.com
   Assignee|jskar...@redhat.com |pemen...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1376899] Review Request: pcaudiolib - Portable C Audio Library

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376899

Petr Menšík  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pemen...@redhat.com
   Assignee|jskar...@redhat.com |pemen...@redhat.com



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948



--- Comment #3 from Michal Ruprich  ---
Please disregard my inquiry about the copr repo. I totally forgot about the
outage today.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1374948] Review Request: dynamips - Cisco router emulator

2016-09-20 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374948

Michal Ruprich  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||athma...@gmail.com,
   ||mrupr...@redhat.com
  Flags||needinfo?(athma...@gmail.co
   ||m)



--- Comment #2 from Michal Ruprich  ---
Hi, I'm not aware of any policy regarding emulators. Could you be more
specific? Perhaps provide some link to anything explaining this?

Also there seems to be a problem with the Copr link. I am unable to open it.
Could you re-check whether it is correct?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org