[Bug 1391216] Review Request: python3-pygments - Syntax highlighting engine written in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391216 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ticot...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1336555] Review Request: python3-pytz - World Timezone Definitions for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336555 --- Comment #2 from Tim Orling --- WARNING: Cannot download url: http://pypi.python.org/packages/source/p/pytz/pytz-2016.4.tar.gz Latest: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/pytz/2016.7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376932] Review Request: python3-markupsafe - Implements a XML/HTML/ XHTML Markup safe string for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376932 --- Comment #2 from Tim Orling --- ERROR: 'Error 404 downloading http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-markupsafe-0.23-1.el7.src.rpm' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1384130] Review Request: python3-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384130 --- Comment #1 from Tim Orling --- Koji EPEL7 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16345936 Koji EL6 build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16345941 Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: === - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel => This is ok, as %{python3_pkgversion}-devel is used and this is EPEL only. - Latest version is 1.1.3, provided version is 1.1.1 => To be fair, upstream has bumped twice in 20 days. - Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 17274880 bytes in 278 files. See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#PackageDocumentation = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 255 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/parallels/1384130-python3-sqlalchemy/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses => In EPEL there is no owner of /usr/share/licenses [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses => In EPEL there is no owner of /usr/share/licenses [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. Note: Macros in: python34-sqlalchemy (description) [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Pac
[Bug 1384130] Review Request: python3-sqlalchemy - Modular and flexible ORM library for python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384130 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ticot...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1384249] Review Request: python3-ply - Python Lex-Yacc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384249 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Tim Orling --- Koji build EPEL7: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16345664 Koji build EL6: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16345670 Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: === - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel => This is ok, as %{python3_pkgversion}-devel is used and this is EPEL only. - Latest version is 3.9, provided version is 3.8 = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 141 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/parallels/1384249-python3-ply/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. Note: Macros in: python34-ply (description) [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [!]: Latest version is packaged. => ply 3.9 is latest [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on a
[Bug 1384249] Review Request: python3-ply - Python Lex-Yacc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1384249 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ticot...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324636] Review Request: python3-dbus - D-Bus Python 3 Bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324636 Tim Orling changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Tim Orling --- Koji build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16344573 Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated Issues: === - Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel => This is ok, as %{python3_pkgversion}-devel is used and this is EPEL only. - Package should not use obsolete m4 macros Note: Some obsoleted macros found, see the attachment. See: https://fedorahosted.org/FedoraReview/wiki/AutoTools => This is ok, as 'autoupdate' is used in spec file to replace obsolete macros = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. => expected behavior for python extensions, *.so -> site-packages [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/parallels/1324636-python3-dbus/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/licenses => EPEL7 has no owner of /usr/share/licenses [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/licenses [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. Note: Macros in: python34-dbus (summary), python34-dbus (description) [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-2.git33a75f9.fc23 has been pushed to the Fedora 23 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f0639c407b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-2.git33a75f9.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-844bebd440 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1279104] Review Request: python-pbkdf2 - password-based key derivation in pure Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279104 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonnyheggh...@sigaint.org Flags||needinfo?(gy...@fsfe.org) --- Comment #8 from Jonny Heggheim --- Just to not step on anyone toes: Any updates? Anyone want to maintain this package? This package is a dependency on Electrum, which I want to include in Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392649] Review Request: tacacs+- Cisco AAA server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392649 --- Comment #1 from Philip Prindeville --- Grrr... Copy&paste issues w/ my VM. Let's try it again: Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/tacacs+.spec SRPM URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/tacacs+-F4.0.4.29a-2.fc24.src.rpm Description: Tacacs+ authentication/authorization/accounting daaemon Fedora Account System Username: philipp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392649] New: Review Request: tacacs+- Cisco AAA server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392649 Bug ID: 1392649 Summary: Review Request: tacacs+- Cisco AAA server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: phil...@redfish-solutions.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/tacacs+-F4.0.4.29a-2.fc24.src.rpm SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~philipp/tacacs+-F4.0.4.29a-2.fc24.x86_64.rpm Description: Tacacs+ authentication/authorization/accounting daaemon Fedora Account System Username: philipp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 --- Comment #16 from Jonny Heggheim --- I am not sure if I should create a new ticket or re-use this, anyway just let me know if I should create a new ticket. Here is an updated version based on the work of Samuel Gyger: Spec URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/python-slowaes/python-slowaes.spec SRPM URL: https://jonny.fedorapeople.org/python-slowaes/python-slowaes-0.1a1-6.fc25.src.rpm Description: A pure Python AES implementation Fedora Account System Username: jonny Anyone that would like to do a formal review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382928] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Entity-Parser - PSGI compliant HTTP Entity Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382928 Bug 1382928 depends on bug 1382926, which changed state. Bug 1382926 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser - HTTP MultiPart Parser https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382926 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1382926] Review Request: perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser - HTTP MultiPart Parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1382926 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2016-11-03 14:22:24 |2016-11-07 18:24:41 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-MultiPartParser-0.01-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1387837] Review Request: python-hidapi - Interface to the hidapi library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387837 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc24, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc24, python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc24, python-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1387835] Review Request: python-binstruct - Library for read/ write access of binary data via structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387835 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc24, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc24, python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc24, python-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1387834] Review Request: python-evic - USB programmer for devices based on the Joyetech Evic VTC Mini
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387834 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc24, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc24, python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc24, python-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1387836] Review Request: python-bitstruct - Interpret strings as packed binary data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387836 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-binstruct-1.0.1-1.fc24, python-bitstruct-3.3.1-1.fc24, python-evic-0.1-0.4.git20160814.f916017.fc24, python-hidapi-0.7.99.post20-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1386735] Review Request: php-fedora-autoloader - Fedora Autoloader
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1386735 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- php-fedora-autoloader-0.2.1-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm3.7 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #15 from Orion Poplawski --- Hmm, maybe hold of a bit. I'm trying to use it to compile pocl, but not having luck yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1352215] Review Request: llvm3.7 -- Versioned LLVM 3.7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1352215 --- Comment #14 from Orion Poplawski --- Milan - could you build this for EPEL7 too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 --- Comment #15 from Jonny Heggheim --- Ok, thanks for your feedback -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 Samuel Gyger changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(gy...@fsfe.org) | --- Comment #14 from Samuel Gyger --- Hey Jonny, I didn't find the time. Feel free to take over, you can use all the Files I have Provided here. They are free to use under what ever license you want to use them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157299] Review Request: "jonathan-jeremie" - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157299 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||punto...@libero.it, ||wei.d.c...@intel.com Flags||needinfo?(wei.d.chen@intel. ||com) --- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo --- hi, can you close this bug? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157299] Review Request: "jonathan-jeremie" - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157299 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1157299] Review Request: "jonathan-jeremie" - Distributed Object Platform (DOP) written entirely in Java
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1157299 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||652183 (FE-JAVASIG) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1086608] Review Request: jna-posix - Java library for accessing common POSIX functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086608 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1187082] Review Request: python-slowaes - An Implementation of AES in python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1187082 Jonny Heggheim changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonnyheggh...@sigaint.org Flags||needinfo?(gy...@fsfe.org) --- Comment #13 from Jonny Heggheim --- What is the update? Do you have done informal reviews? I am interested in getting Electrum and slowaes into Fedora. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392606] New: Review Request: perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 - Process the special UTF-7 variant required by IMAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392606 Bug ID: 1392606 Summary: Review Request: perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7 - Process the special UTF-7 variant required by IMAP Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ti...@math.uh.edu QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7.spec SRPM URL: https://www.math.uh.edu/~tibbs/review/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7/perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7-1.05-1.fc24.src.rpm Description: This module is able to encode and decode IMAP mailbox names using the UTF-7 modification specified in RFC2060 section 5.1.3. Fedora Account System Username: tibbs Koji scratch build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16340823 Fedora-review output (note that any strange-permissions errors are due to rpmlint not being able to cope with my umask): Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Encode(perl-Encode-Locale) [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. ἐπιθυμία:..perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7/review-perl-Encode-IMAPUTF7> cat review.txt This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla upstream sources. No licenses found. Please check the source files for licenses manually. [ ]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown must be documented in the spec. [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Encode(perl-Encode-Locale) [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]:
[Bug 1392599] Review Request: mcrcon - Console based rcon client for minecraft servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599 --- Comment #1 from srakitnican --- Sorry, wrong SRPM URL. SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/srakitnican/minecraft/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00474083-mcrcon/mcrcon-0.0.5-2.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392599] Review Request: mcrcon - Console based rcon client for minecraft servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599 srakitnican changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392599] New: Review Request: mcrcon - Console based rcon client for minecraft servers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392599 Bug ID: 1392599 Summary: Review Request: mcrcon - Console based rcon client for minecraft servers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: samuel.rakitni...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/srakitnican/minecraft/mcrcon.git/tree/mcrcon.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/srakitnican/minecraft/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00474083-mcrcon/mcrcon-0.0.5-2.fc26.x86_64.rpm Description: Mcrcon is powerful IPv6 compliant minecraft rcon client with bukkit coloring support. It is well suited for remote administration and to be used as part of automated server maintenance scripts. Does not cause "IO: Broken pipe" or "IO: Connection reset" spam in server console. Features: - Interacive terminal mode. Keeps the connection alive. - Send multiple commands in one command line. - Silent mode. Does not print rcon output. - Support for bukkit coloring on Windows and Linux (sh compatible shells). - Multiplatform code. Compiles on many platforms with only minor changes. Fedora Account System Username: srakitnican This is my first package, thus I am seeking for a sponsor! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376867] Review Request: python3-pycurl - Python interface to libcurl for Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376867 Bug 1376867 depends on bug 1376864, which changed state. Bug 1376864 Summary: Ship python34-pyflakes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376864 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383487] Review Request: php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth - Implements the Akamai {OPEN} EdgeGrid Authentication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383487 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- php-akamai-open-edgegrid-auth-0.6.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1370239] Review Request: python-ansible-tower-cli - A CLI tool for Ansible Tower
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1370239 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- python-ansible-tower-cli-3.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383488] Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383488] Review Request: php-asm89-stack-cors - Cross-origin resource sharing library and stack middleware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383488 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- php-asm89-stack-cors-1.0.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390156] Review Request: jsonassert - JUnit extension to write JSON unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- jsonassert-1.4.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-15dbccbf42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-1.git33a75f9.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e11a1fd11d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392553] New: webalizer package for EPEL7
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392553 Bug ID: 1392553 Summary: webalizer package for EPEL7 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: watte...@watters.ws QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org The webalizer package is not available in epel7. Can you please build this package for CentOS 7? There is an SRPM available for CentOS 6.8 which builds properly after patching the spec file as shown below. [root@example-srv1 SPECS]# diff -u webalizer.spec.orig webalizer.spec --- webalizer.spec.orig2016-11-07 11:59:46.550527719 -0500 +++ webalizer.spec2016-11-07 11:59:53.844621850 -0500 @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Patch6: webalizer-2.01_10-confuser.patch Patch9: webalizer-2.01-10-groupvisit.patch BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) -BuildRequires: gd-devel, db4-devel, bzip2-devel +BuildRequires: gd-devel, db4-devel, bzip2-devel, libdb-devel Requires(pre): /usr/sbin/useradd Requires: httpd, crontabs -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324636] Review Request: python3-dbus - D-Bus Python 3 Bindings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324636 Orion Poplawski changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(or...@cora.nwra.c | |om) | --- Comment #4 from Orion Poplawski --- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-dbus.spec SRPM URL: http://www.cora.nwra.com/~orion/fedora/python3-dbus-1.2.4-2.el7.src.rpm * Mon Nov 7 2016 Orion Poplawski - 1.2.4-2 - Run autoupdate to remove obsolete macros such as AC_PROG_LIBTOOL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-2.git33a75f9.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-844bebd440 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-2.git33a75f9.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-f0639c407b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1361659] Re-Review Request: vdsm - Virtual Desktop Server Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361659 Yaniv Bronhaim changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(ybronhei@redhat.c | |om) | --- Comment #30 from Yaniv Bronhaim --- currently nobody works on it. we plan to re-visit it and finish the review in later versions. please update the bug status if needed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1315495] Review Request: ibus-table-coptic - Unicode Ibus keyboard input for Sahidic Coptic
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1315495 --- Comment #9 from Mike FABIAN --- Created attachment 1218128 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1218128&action=edit cop-greek-kbd.mim For use with ibus-m17n, the attached file can be used. You will need to install ibus-m17n Any suitable Unicode font Installation $ mkdir -p ~/.m17n.d/ $ cp cop-greek-kbd.mim ~/.m17n.d/ $ ibus restart Now ibus should list the newly added input method: $ ibus list-engine | grep -i cop m17n:cop:greek-kbd - greek-kbd (m17n) Now add the input method using the gnome-control-center or, on non-Gnome desktops, ibus-setup. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392434] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML:: LibXML::Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392388] Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392388 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Geo-Distance-0.20-1.fc ||26 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2016-11-07 11:02:45 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392434] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML:: LibXML::Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber-0.002-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 libc.so.6()(64bit) 1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit) 1 libdl.so.2()(64bit) 1 libm.so.6()(64bit) 1 libperl.so.5.24()(64bit) 1 libxml2.so.2()(64bit) 1 libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit) 1 libz.so.1()(64bit) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.3 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(XML::LibXML) >= 1.90 1 perl(XML::LibXML::Devel) 1 perl(XSLoader) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 1 rtld(GNU_HASH) Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber-0.002-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(XML::LibXML::Devel::SetLineNumber) = 0.002 1 perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber = 0.002-1.fc26 1 perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber(x86-64) = 0.002-1.fc26 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber* perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.src: W: invalid-license (GPL+ perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.src: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.src: W: invalid-license CC-BY-SA) perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.x86_64: W: invalid-license (GPL+ perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.x86_64: W: invalid-license Artistic perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.x86_64: W: invalid-license CC-BY-SA) 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. The license is valid. It seems that rpmlint did not properly process '((GPL+ or Artistic) or CC-BY-SA)'. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383781] Review Request: sunflow - A rendering system for photo-realistic image synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781 --- Comment #17 from Michal Vala --- fixed, thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343977] Review Request: asciidoctor-mallard - A Project Mallard converter for AsciiDoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977 Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 --- Comment #9 from Tomas Repik --- Spec URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/classloader-leak-test-framework/v1/classloader-leak-test-framework.spec SRPM URL: https://trepik.fedorapeople.org/classloader-leak-test-framework/v1/classloader-leak-test-framework-1.1.1-1.fc24.src.rpm Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16336757 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392388] Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392388 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Geo-Distance -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-1.git33a75f9.fc23 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 23. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-49e258e3cc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-1.git33a75f9.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-17a788c064 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-1.git33a75f9.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-ee53cd72dc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications-0-1.git33a75f9.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-e11a1fd11d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392457] Re-review Request for renaming python package to python2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392457 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mhron...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392457] New: Re-review Request for renaming python package to python2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392457 Bug ID: 1392457 Summary: Re-review Request for renaming python package to python2 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: cstra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://github.com/fedora-python/python2-spec/blob/py2rename/python.spec Diff from master branch: https://github.com/fedora-python/python2-spec/compare/py2rename SRPM URL: https://cstratak.fedorapeople.org/python2-2.7.12-9.fc26.src.rpm Fedora Account System Username: cstratak With Python 2 reaching end of life at 2020 and also having by default in Fedora the Python 3 version of the language it only makes sense to explicitly reflect in the name of the package, the respective major version. Also in the future, there is a high possibility that python will refer only to python3. Thus I would like to rename python to python2. The package still virtually provide the python name. All the changes in the SPEC file are in the posted github link. The change is intended only for rawhide. This can be tested by using a rawhide machine and enabling my copr repo [0] where I have a build with the renamed python: dnf copr enable cstratak/Python2 Then by invoking "dnf update" or "dnf update python" the python2 package will be installed, replacing the python package with no conflicts. [0] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/Python2/build/473988/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1372836] Review Request: python-hug - A Python framework that makes developing APIs simple
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1372836 Iryna Shcherbina changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ishch...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392434] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML:: LibXML::Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1392451 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392451 [Bug 1392451] Review Request: perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser - Parse HTML reliably -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392451] Review Request: perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser - Parse HTML reliably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392451 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1392434 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 [Bug 1392434] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML::LibXML::Node -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392451] New: Review Request: perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser - Parse HTML reliably
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392451 Bug ID: 1392451 Summary: Review Request: perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser - Parse HTML reliably Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser/perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser/perl-HTML-HTML5-Parser-0.301-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: HTML parser with XML::LibXML-like DOM interface. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1391487] Review Request: nextcloud-client - The Nextcloud Client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391487 Nick Bebout changed: What|Removed |Added CC||germano.massu...@gmail.com Flags||needinfo?(germano.massullo@ ||gmail.com) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1086608] Review Request: jna-posix - Java library for accessing common POSIX functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1086608 Michal Srb changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(m...@redhat.com) | Last Closed||2016-11-07 09:13:12 --- Comment #6 from Michal Srb --- Oops, sorry. This should have been closed long time age. Closing now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392434] Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML:: LibXML::Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390156] Review Request: jsonassert - JUnit extension to write JSON unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- jsonassert-1.4.0-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2016-15dbccbf42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390156] Review Request: jsonassert - JUnit extension to write JSON unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1267340] Review Request: rubygem-minitest-around - Around block for minitest
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1267340 Vít Ondruch changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Ilya Gradina from comment #3) > - updated to version 0.4.0 Thx > - removed from BuildRequires rubygem-cucumber(with cucumber not pass the > tests). Actually you can run the cucumber test suite. This is the diff I tested: ``` --- rubygem-minitest-around.spec2016-11-07 14:50:38.050724282 +0100 +++ rubygem-minitest-around.spec.back2016-11-07 14:49:26.946770370 +0100 @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRequires: ruby(release) BuildRequires: rubygems-devel BuildRequires: rubygem(minitest) +BuildRequires: rubygem(cucumber) BuildArch: noarch %description @@ -54,6 +55,8 @@ pushd .%{gem_instdir} sed -i "/require 'bundler/ s/^/#/" test/helper.rb ruby -Ilib -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*_test.rb", &method(:require)' + + RUBYOPT=-Ilib cucumber --tag ~@todo --tag ~@rspec popd %files ``` There are excluded some parts, but these corresponds to the Rakefile [1]. And actually, there are also test/*_spec.rb files which could be executed, so the final patch according to my testing should be: ``` --- rubygem-minitest-around.spec.orig2016-11-07 15:05:01.312144585 +0100 +++ rubygem-minitest-around.spec2016-11-07 15:04:43.281157338 +0100 @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ BuildRequires: ruby(release) BuildRequires: rubygems-devel BuildRequires: rubygem(minitest) +BuildRequires: rubygem(cucumber) BuildArch: noarch %description @@ -53,7 +54,9 @@ %check pushd .%{gem_instdir} sed -i "/require 'bundler/ s/^/#/" test/helper.rb - ruby -Ilib -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*_test.rb", &method(:require)' + RUBYOPT=-Ilib ruby -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*_{test,spec}.rb", &method(:require)' + + RUBYOPT=-Ilib cucumber --tag ~@todo --tag ~@rspec popd %files ``` The RUBYOPT export is required, -Ilib is not enough, since there are spawned some testing sub processes. In upstream, Bundler takes care about it, but without Bundler, we have to workaround it. Otherwise the package looks sane => APPROVED but please make sure to enable as much tests as possible. [1] https://github.com/splattael/minitest-around/blob/master/Rakefile#L37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392434] New: Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML:: LibXML::Node
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392434 Bug ID: 1392434 Summary: Review Request: perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber - Set the line number for an XML::LibXML::Node Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber/perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber/perl-XML-LibXML-Devel-SetLineNumber-0.002-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: If you are, say, writing a parser for a non-XML format that happens to have an XML-like data model, then you might wish to parse your format into an XML::LibXML document with elements, attributes and so on. And you might want all those nodes to return the correct line numbers when the "line_number" method is called on them. This Perl module allows you to set the line number. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376035] Review Request: modulemd - Module metadata manipulation library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376035 --- Comment #7 from Petr Šabata --- Just released the first stable release. https://pypi.python.org/pypi/modulemd/1.0.0 Note this is incompatible with the development releases that COPR probably relies on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1346060] Review Request: python-pintail-asciidoc - Use AsciiDoc pages in Pintail sites
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1346060 Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(juj...@jujens.eu) --- Comment #8 from Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) --- - Changed %{sum} to %{summary} - Removed the %check - I am packaging the dependency (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977) - Removed macro from change log - Updated the files as you have mentioned https://dhanvi.fedorapeople.org/packages/pintail-asciidoc/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1343977] Review Request: asciidoctor-mallard - A Project Mallard converter for AsciiDoc
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1343977 --- Comment #8 from Tummala Dhanvi (c0mrad3) --- I have added the testing part by adding this line ruby -Ilib -e 'Dir.glob "./test/*.rb"' Hope it should do it. Updated packages here https://dhanvi.fedorapeople.org/packages/asciidoctor-mallard/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392309] Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392309 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Target Release|--- |trunk Component|Package Review |Package Review Version|rawhide |trunk Product|Fedora |RDO QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |jp...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392388] Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392388 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Geo-Distance-0.20-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.0) 1 perl(Carp) 1 perl(Math::Trig) 1 perl(constant) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Geo-Distance-0.20-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Geo::Distance) = 0.20 1 perl-Geo-Distance = 0.20-1.fc26 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Geo-Distance* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/classloader-leak-test-framework -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1367819] Review Request: znc-clientbuffer - ZNC module for client specific buffers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367819 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/znc-clientbuffer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392227] Review Request: pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications - Adds typing notifications for group chats in Pidgin
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392227 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pidgin-groupchat-typing-notifications -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374781] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram - Sphinx extension for documenting CLI programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374781 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390156] Review Request: jsonassert - JUnit extension to write JSON unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 --- Comment #8 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/jsonassert -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392309] Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392309 --- Comment #5 from Chandan Kumar --- Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-4.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16334626 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392388] Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392388 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392388] New: Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392388 Bug ID: 1392388 Summary: Review Request: perl-Geo-Distance - Calculate distances and closest locations Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ppi...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Geo-Distance/perl-Geo-Distance.spec SRPM URL: https://ppisar.fedorapeople.org/perl-Geo-Distance/perl-Geo-Distance-0.20-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: This Perl library aims to provide as many tools to make it as simple as possible to calculate distances between geographic points, and anything that can be derived from that. Currently there is support for finding the closest locations within a specified distance, to find the closest number of points to a specified point, and to do basic point-to-point distance calculations. Fedora Account System Username: ppisar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|prais...@redhat.com |tre...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 --- Comment #7 from Pavel Raiskup --- FTR, another two nice errors: Review not approved by the assignee of the ticket tre...@redhat.com Review not approved by the assignee of the ticket tre...@redhat.com Tomáš, can you please "take" the bug, too? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392309] Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392309 --- Comment #4 from Javier Peña --- We still have two issues (see rpmlint section below): - The libvirt compiled files end up in the wrong subpackage. You just need to change the following: %exclude %{python2_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/drivers/libvirt_driver.py* %files -n python2-%{sname}-libvirt %license LICENSE %{python2_sitelib}/%{pypi_name}/drivers/libvirt_driver.py* And the same applies to the python3 subpackage. - Also, the generated rpms fail to install because they require a newer version of python-pyghmi (>= 1.0.3) than available in the repo (0.8.0). We'll need to get a newer dependency or remove the version from the requirement, although I'm afraid the latter will cause issues down the road. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Package installs properly. Note: Installation errors (see attachment) See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 9 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1392309-python-os-faults/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fu
[Bug 1390063] Package Review: classloader-leak-test-framework - Detection and verification of Java ClassLoader leaks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390063 Pavel Raiskup changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ |fedora-review? --- Comment #6 from Pavel Raiskup --- Pkgdb says: "Review approved by the person creating the ticket prais...@redhat.com" Let's hope the check makes sense elsewhere, Tomáš, can you approve? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380179] Review Request: webvirtmgr - panel for manage virtual machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380179 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@redhat.com --- Comment #4 from Matthias Runge --- Hey, I'm currently the django maintainer in Fedora (and EPEL). I'd be trying to get rid of (unmaintained by upstream) Django-1.6 in EPEL7 ASAP. Django releases roughly every 9 months, latest LTS version is Django-1.8. That means, you should wait for a new release of webvirtmgr, if possible. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1390156] Review Request: jsonassert - JUnit extension to write JSON unit tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1390156 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383781] Review Request: sunflow - A rendering system for photo-realistic image synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|652183 (FE-JAVASIG) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=652183 [Bug 652183] Java SIG tracker bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392309] Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392309 --- Comment #3 from Chandan Kumar --- Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-3.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=16333720 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383781] Review Request: sunflow - A rendering system for photo-realistic image synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #16 from gil cattaneo --- NON blocking issues: [!]: Changelog in prescribed format. sunflow.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.07.3.8097f6d ['0.07.3-8097f6d.fc26', '0.07.3-8097f6d'] Please, fix before import Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1383781] Review Request: sunflow - A rendering system for photo-realistic image synthesis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1383781 gil cattaneo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #15 from gil cattaneo --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "BSD (3 clause)". 22 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/gil/1383781-sunflow/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128/apps, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/128x128 [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [!]: Changelog in prescribed format. [?]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in sunflow [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Java: [x]: Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build [x]: Packages have proper BuildRequires/Requires on jpackage-utils Note: Maven packages do not need to (Build)Require jpackage-utils. It is pulled in by maven-local [x]: Javadoc documentation files are generated and included in -javadoc subpackage [x]: Javadoc subpackages should not have Requires: jpackage-utils [x]: Javadocs are placed in %{_javadocdir}/%{name} (no -%{version} symlink) Maven: [x]: If package contains pom.xml files install it (including metadata) even when building with ant [x]: POM files have correct Maven mapping [x]: Maven packages should use new style packaging [x]: Old add_to_ma
[Bug 1389286] Review Request: perl-Module-Install-DOAP - Generate META.yml data from DOAP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1389286 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2016-11-07 05:11:04 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1392309] Review Request: python-os-faults - OpenStack fault-injection library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392309 --- Comment #2 from Chandan Kumar --- Hello Jpena, Thanks for the review. All the above comments are fixed. Here is the updated SPEC file: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults.spec SRPM: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-os-faults-0.1.5-2.fc24.src.rpm and successful Koji Build: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1691 Thanks, Chandan Kumar -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1380179] Review Request: webvirtmgr - panel for manage virtual machine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1380179 jiri vanek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jva...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jva...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from jiri vanek --- Hello! I'm wiling to review, however whats the point of bringing it in, if the application do not work in Fedora? Maybe django1.6-compact package is the way to go in fedora (and keep python2)? I do not have precedense for epel7 only pkg, although I do not have issues with epel7 pkg only... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org