[Bug 1409866] Review Request: perl-Astro-SunTime - Calculates sun rise/ set times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Astro-SunTime-0.05-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-39d372dc15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1409866] Review Request: perl-Astro-SunTime - Calculates sun rise/ set times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866 --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Astro-SunTime-0.05-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-820c75f0c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1403314] Review Request: python-publicsuffix - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403314 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- python-publicsuffix-1.1.0-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1403314] Review Request: python-publicsuffix - Get a public suffix for a domain name using the Public Suffix List.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403314 --- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System --- python-publicsuffix-1.1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dc00f9f341 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1394193] Review Request: arduino-builder - A command line tool for compiling Arduino sketches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- arduino-builder-1.0.5-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9e3f59cacf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1409866] Review Request: perl-Astro-SunTime - Calculates sun rise/ set times
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409866 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Astro-SunTime-0.05-2.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5bfcccedd5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1412801] Review Request: python-networkmanager - Easy communication with NetworkManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412801 --- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-networkmanager -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411028] Review Request: python-backports-shutil_which - Backport of shutil.which from Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-backports-shutil_which -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 --- Comment #5 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pantheon-photos -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411028] Review Request: python-backports-shutil_which - Backport of shutil.which from Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028 Lameire Alexis changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? needinfo+|fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Lameire Alexis --- If no ambiguity I validate it -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411028] Review Request: python-backports-shutil_which - Backport of shutil.which from Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028 --- Comment #3 from Mohamed El Morabity --- License fixed: Spec URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-backports-shutil_which/python-backports-shutil_which.spec SRPM URL: https://melmorabity.fedorapeople.org/packages/python-backports-shutil_which/python-backports-shutil_which-3.5.1-2.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1411028] Review Request: python-backports-shutil_which - Backport of shutil.which from Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028 --- Comment #2 from Mohamed El Morabity --- Thanks for your review Alexis. (In reply to Lameire Alexis from comment #1) > Hello, > Please submit a PR to the origiual project for adding the licence header > inside the source and add the request url as comment inside your spec and I > will validate the review. I was wrong about the project license. Since it's a backport of Python 3 (without modification), the code in shutil_which.py is covered by the Python license (as already specified in its header comment... and the LICENSE file). Extra bits (__init__.py, deployment script) are covered by the MIT license, as specified also in the LICENSE file. For these last files, which are trivial, is it really worth adding a license header? Nothing in the MIT license prescribes it. Anyway I will upload a new version of the package with license fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1406786] Review Request: configsnap - Record and compare system state
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786 Ricardo Cordeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ricardo.corde...@tux.com.pt |christos.triantafyllidis@gm ||ail.com Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Ricardo Cordeiro --- Hi Christos, Thanks for your update, modified specfile and patch. The package is ready to be included in the package DB. Please find below my last review. Kind Regards, Ricardo Cordeiro Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/reviews/configsnap/1406786-configsnap/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: %defattr present but not needed [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [-]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [-]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [-]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise justified. [-]: Description and summary s
[Bug 1411028] Review Request: python-backports-shutil_which - Backport of shutil.which from Python 3
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411028 Lameire Alexis changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||alexis.lame...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? needinfo+ --- Comment #1 from Lameire Alexis --- Hello, Please submit a PR to the origiual project for adding the licence header inside the source and add the request url as comment inside your spec and I will validate the review. Here the compleate list : = MUST items = Generic: [!]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. source files are not licenced, [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* PSF". 5 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/alexises/projet_new/rpm/review-python-backports- shutil_which/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python2.7/site- packages/backports(python2-backports-functools_lru_cache, python2-configparser, python-backports) [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in t
[Bug 1412801] Review Request: python-networkmanager - Easy communication with NetworkManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412801 --- Comment #5 from Igor Gnatenko --- (In reply to John Dulaney from comment #4) > Spec URL: https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/python-networkmanager.spec > SRPM URL: > https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/python-networkmanager-1.2.1-3.fc25.src.rpm > > I put the manpage into the docs subpackage. I figured having the examples > in a subpackage would be better for security, the whole "don't install > things that are not necessary" thing. There's nothing secure (I mean non-secure) in having examples in main subpackages. You want to split docs only if they are big (>10M) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1412801] Review Request: python-networkmanager - Easy communication with NetworkManager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412801 --- Comment #4 from John Dulaney --- Spec URL: https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/python-networkmanager.spec SRPM URL: https://jdulaney.fedorapeople.org/python-networkmanager-1.2.1-3.fc25.src.rpm I put the manpage into the docs subpackage. I figured having the examples in a subpackage would be better for security, the whole "don't install things that are not necessary" thing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1391334] Review Request: freeorion - Turn-based space empire and galactic conquest (4X) computer game
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1391334 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- freeorion-0.4.6-5.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa --- APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 --- Comment #3 from Neal Gompa --- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "BSD (2 clause)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 335 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1416523-pantheon- photos/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/szl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ckb, /usr/share/locale/rue/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ckb/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/rue, /usr/share/locale/szl [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/locale/rue/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/szl/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ckb/LC_MESSAGES, /usr/share/locale/ckb, /usr/share/locale/rue, /usr/share/locale/szl [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: The spec file handles locales properly. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package contains icons. Note: icons in pantheon-photos [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 5 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source pack
[Bug 1412128] Review Request: libpreludedb - Prelude DB Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412128 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- libpreludedb-3.1.0-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414844] Review Request: php-react - Event-driven, non-blocking I/ O with PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414844 --- Comment #2 from Shawn Iwinski --- (In reply to Remi Collet from comment #1) > Build fails > > + : Minimal autoloader test > + php -r 'require > "/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/php-react-0.4.2-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/share/php/React/ > autoload.php";' > /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YfSHQ4: line 32: php: command not found > > > Probably you forget to require php-cli ;) Yep :/ Diff: https://github.com/siwinski/rpms/commit/6761f4175985f4c5cd6574c84b46ff9b9a1e3d1f Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/siwinski/rpms/6761f4175985f4c5cd6574c84b46ff9b9a1e3d1f/php-react/php-react.spec SRPM URL: https://siwinski.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/php-react-0.4.2-2.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1362487] Review Request: arcanist - A command line interface to Phabricator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1362487 --- Comment #22 from Ling Li --- When using the libphutil package (from https://kanarip.fedorapeople.org/phabricator/), arc complains about Exception [cURL/77] (https://company.com/api/user.whoami) The SSL CA Bundles that we tried to use could not be read or are not formatted correctly. (Run with `--trace` for a full exception trace.) If I added resources/ into /usr/share/libphutil, then everything works fine. I don't know PHP/libphutil enough and couldn't tell if it's something wrong in my system or in the RPM. So, just for your information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini --- Sorry about the noise, I forgot to add a fallback icon to this package. It's fixed in this version: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/decathorpe/fedora-packaging/2674dce5ad917fd23d0c07ef6eda89f3ef8055c7/specs/pantheon-photos/pantheon-photos.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/decathorpe/staging/fedora-25-x86_64/00503758-pantheon-photos/pantheon-photos-0.2.1.1-2.fc25.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1406786] Review Request: configsnap - Record and compare system state
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786 Christos Triantafyllidis changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(christos.triantaf | |ylli...@gmail.com) | --- Comment #4 from Christos Triantafyllidis --- Thank you Ricardo, Updated SRPM: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/configsnap-0.11-2.fc25.src.rpm Updated SPEC: https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/configsnap.spec Included patch (as I don't think that needs to go to upstream, that is a Fedora implementation issue): https://ctria.fedorapeople.org/packaging/configsnap/python_executable.patch On your comments: [!]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. Correct, changed! [!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python Correct, changed! [?] - getData script provided by upstream is not included. I understand that its purpose is limited as it only serves to warn the user that the script has been renamed to configsnap. I guess you've not included it by design, although, if included, /usr/bin/getdata would not collide with any current packages on Fedora, RHEL and EPEL repositories. Please confirm that this was done by design. That is done by design that was added as part of the deprecation of the old project name. There is no need to introduce this in Fedora/EPEL. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1406786] Review Request: configsnap - Record and compare system state
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1406786 Christos Triantafyllidis changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416523] New: Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416523 Bug ID: 1416523 Summary: Review Request: pantheon-photos - Pantheon photo manager and viewer Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/decathorpe/fedora-packaging/f4f48bfc3e65bff7820737527d3f6d9bd507ceaf/specs/pantheon-photos/pantheon-photos.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/decathorpe/staging/fedora-25-x86_64/00503749-pantheon-photos/pantheon-photos-0.2.1.1-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: The elementary continuation of Shotwell, originally written by Yorba Foundation. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17411734 COPR build for f25 and rawhide: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/decathorpe/staging/build/503749/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416492] New: Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-XML - Glimpse at an Enlightened Perl (XML Development)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416492 Bug ID: 1416492 Summary: Review Request: perl-Task-Kensho-XML - Glimpse at an Enlightened Perl (XML Development) Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jples...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Task-Kensho-XML/perl-Task-Kensho-XML.spec SRPM URL: https://jplesnik.fedorapeople.org/perl-Task-Kensho-XML/perl-Task-Kensho-XML-0.39-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: Task::Kensho is a list of recommended modules for Enlightened Perl development. CPAN is wonderful, but there are too many wheels and you have to pick and choose amongst the various competing technologies. Fedora Account System Username: jples...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1410901] Review Request: python-fmn - A system for generic fedmsg-driven notifications for end users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410901 Jeremy Cline changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org | |) | --- Comment #4 from Jeremy Cline --- Spec URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-fmn.spec SRPM URL: https://jcline.fedorapeople.org/python-fmn-1.1.0-1.fc25.src.rpm I updated the Provides. I don't know why I forgot about the release, but originally I couldn't use the version macro because I (somewhat arbitrarily) versioned the combined package at 1.0.0 since some of the old packages were 0.x.z and one was at 1.0.3. In hindsight this was bad, since the library suddenly dropped in version (and this is what made me hesitant to claim to provide it), but I've since bumped (somewhat arbitrarily) the version to 1.1.0 so everything is okay. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c3fe9e7108 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc ||26 --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Thank you for the review and the repository. I added the the dependencies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-dc00f9f341 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1324020] Review Request: cassandra - OpenSource database Apache Cassandra
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1324020 Tomas Repik changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1183877 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1183877 [Bug 1183877] thrift-0.9.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416477] New: Review Request: python-openstack-doc-tools - Tools for OpenStack Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416477 Bug ID: 1416477 Summary: Review Request: python-openstack-doc-tools - Tools for OpenStack Documentation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jp...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/openstack-doc-tools/python-openstack-doc-tools.spec SRPM URL: https://jpena.fedorapeople.org/openstack-doc-tools/python-openstack-doc-tools-1.3.0-1.src.rpm Description: Tools used by the OpenStack Documentation Project. Fedora Account System Username: jpena Koji scratch build available at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17411247 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416477] Review Request: python-openstack-doc-tools - Tools for OpenStack Documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416477 Javier Peña changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1373513 (RDO-OCATA) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1373513 [Bug 1373513] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Ocata packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1412264] Re-Review request: python2-docs - Documentation for the Python programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412264 --- Comment #5 from Charalampos Stratakis --- Addressed all your notes (I think). SPEC: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/fedora-python/python-docs/master/python2-docs.spec SRPM: https://cstratak.fedorapeople.org/python2-docs-2.7.13-1.fc26.src.rpm Diff: https://github.com/fedora-python/python-docs/compare/9bd9de270a5bc5bcd8c1afae682e13436b5c19ba...master Fedora Account System Username: cstratak Copr repo: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/cstratak/python-docs scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17411166 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416455] Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416455 Fabio Alessandro Locati changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1416458 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416458 [Bug 1416458] Review Request: python-staticjinja - jinja based static site generator -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416458] New: Review Request: python-staticjinja - jinja based static site generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416458 Bug ID: 1416458 Summary: Review Request: python-staticjinja - jinja based static site generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: f...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-staticjinja.spec SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-staticjinja-0.3.3-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: jinja based static site generator Fedora Account System Username: fale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416458] Review Request: python-staticjinja - jinja based static site generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416458 Fabio Alessandro Locati changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1416455 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416455 [Bug 1416455] Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416455] New: Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416455 Bug ID: 1416455 Summary: Review Request: python-easywatch - super simple directory monitoring Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: f...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-easywatch.spec SRPM URL: https://fale.fedorapeople.org/rpms/python-easywatch-0.0.3-1.fc25.src.rpm Description: super simple directory monitoring Fedora Account System Username: fale -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414004] Review Request: rubygem-rspec-pending_for - Mark specs pending or skipped for specific Ruby engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414004 Bug 1414004 depends on bug 1414002, which changed state. Bug 1414002 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_version - Adds the RubyVersion pseudo-constant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414002 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414002] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_version - Adds the RubyVersion pseudo-constant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414002 František Dvořák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-01-25 08:52:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414004] Review Request: rubygem-rspec-pending_for - Mark specs pending or skipped for specific Ruby engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414004 Bug 1414004 depends on bug 1414001, which changed state. Bug 1414001 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-ruby_engine - Adds the RubyEngine pseudo-constant https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414001 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414001] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_engine - Adds the RubyEngine pseudo-constant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414001 František Dvořák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-01-25 08:52:25 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1410901] Review Request: python-fmn - A system for generic fedmsg-driven notifications for end users
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1410901 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(jer...@jcline.org ||) --- Comment #3 from Randy Barlow --- I believe the Provides statements should be using the release, but even more importantly should be using the version macro. Otherwise, this package will always claim to provide the other packages at the versions they were retired at, which won't be true since it will be changing over time. For example, instead of: Provides: python-fmn-rules = 0.9.1 I think you need: Provides: python-fmn-rules = %{version}-%{release} You can read a bit about that here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Renaming.2FReplacing_Existing_Packages Here's an example spec file that uses a global for the description: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/python-nose.git/tree/python-nose.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1415993] Review Request: perl-Time-Tiny - Time object, with as little code as possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415993 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Time-Tiny-1.07-1.fc26 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-01-25 08:37:27 --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414087] Review Request: Gearboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414087 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Moerner --- Thank you for the suggestion, Itamar and Andrea; I will submit it to rpmfusion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414087] Review Request: Gearboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414087 Itamar Reis Peixoto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ita...@ispbrasil.com.br --- Comment #7 from Itamar Reis Peixoto --- please submit it to rpmfusion, thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404043] Review Request: rdma-core - RDMA core userspace libraries and daemons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043 --- Comment #24 from Jarod Wilson --- (In reply to Jon Ciesla from comment #23) > Package request has been approved: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rdma-core Whoops, I just filed a new package request to get it into pkgdb moments before noticing it had already been done. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404043] Review Request: rdma-core - RDMA core userspace libraries and daemons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043 --- Comment #23 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rdma-core -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Git-Wrapper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414002] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_version - Adds the RubyVersion pseudo-constant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414002 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-ruby_version -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1415993] Review Request: perl-Time-Tiny - Time object, with as little code as possible
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415993 --- Comment #2 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Time-Tiny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414001] Review Request: rubygem-ruby_engine - Adds the RubyEngine pseudo-constant
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414001 --- Comment #7 from Jon Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/rubygem-ruby_engine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414087] Review Request: Gearboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414087 Daniel Moerner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Last Closed||2017-01-25 08:04:53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414087] Review Request: Gearboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414087 --- Comment #6 from Daniel Moerner --- Thank you for sharing, I was not aware of that history. This does look like a clear legal blocker. Thanks all for your help; my apologies for any time you spent on this. I will be much more careful next time. I believe the correct thing to do this is to close this bug "WONTFIX". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 git-core 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.24.1) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.6.0 1 perl(File::Temp) 1 perl(File::chdir) 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Exception) 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::File::RawModification) 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Log) 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Status) 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Statuses) 1 perl(IPC::Cmd) 1 perl(IPC::Open3) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(Sort::Versions) 1 perl(Symbol) 1 perl(overload) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Git-Wrapper-0.047-1.fc26.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Git::Wrapper) = 0.047 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Exception) = 0.047 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::File::RawModification) = 0.047 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Log) = 0.047 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Status) = 0.047 1 perl(Git::Wrapper::Statuses) = 0.047 1 perl-Git-Wrapper = 0.047-1.fc26 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Git-Wrapper* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok FIX: Please add build-requires 'make' and 'findutils'. They are used in spec file. Please correct 'FIX' issue. Otherwise the package looks good. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1394193] Review Request: arduino-builder - A command line tool for compiling Arduino sketches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394193 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- arduino-builder-1.0.5-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9e3f59cacf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1394193] Review Request: arduino-builder - A command line tool for compiling Arduino sketches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394193 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1394193] Review Request: arduino-builder - A command line tool for compiling Arduino sketches
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394193 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- arduino-builder-1.0.5-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e26cf562b7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1416059] Review Request: perl-Git-Wrapper - Wrap git command-line interface for Perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416059 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1415731] Review Request: perl-XML-Generator-PerlData - Perl extension for generating SAX2 events from nested Perl data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415731 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-XML-Generator-PerlData ||-0.95-1.fc26 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-01-25 03:46:34 --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414087] Review Request: Gearboy - Game Boy and Game Boy Color emulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414087 --- Comment #5 from Andrea Musuruane --- Please read: http://gbdev.gg8.se/wiki/articles/Gameboy_Bootstrap_ROM I guess this is a blocker to have Gearboy in Fedora proper. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org