[Bug 1441046] Review Request: swatchbooker - Color swatch editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046



--- Comment #1 from Luya Tshimbalanga  ---
Scratch build result:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18920004

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441046] New: Review Request: swatchbooker - Color swatch editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441046

Bug ID: 1441046
   Summary: Review Request: swatchbooker - Color swatch editor
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: l...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SPECS/swatchbooker.spec
SRPM URL:
https://luya.fedorapeople.org/packages/SRPMS/swatchbooker-0.7.6-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: Color swatch editor
Fedora Account System Username: luya

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441024] Review Request: waiverdb - Companion service to ResultsDB, for recording waivers against test results

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441024

Dan Callaghan  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Review Request: |Review Request: waiverdb -
   |python-waiverdb - Companion |Companion service to
   |service to ResultsDB, for   |ResultsDB, for recording
   |recording waivers against   |waivers against test
   |test results|results



--- Comment #1 from Dan Callaghan  ---
Let's just call the package waiverdb, rather than python-waiverdb, since it's
not really an "addon" package for Python. It's intended to be run as a web
service, not imported as a Python library.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441024] New: Review Request: python-waiverdb - Companion service to ResultsDB, for recording waivers against test results

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441024

Bug ID: 1441024
   Summary: Review Request: python-waiverdb - Companion service to
ResultsDB, for recording waivers against test results
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: m...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://mjia.fedorapeople.org/waiverdb.spec
SRPM URL:
https://mjia.fedorapeople.org/waiverdb-0.1-0.git.26.4fc848b.fc24.src.rpm
Description: WaiverDB is a companion service to ResultsDB, for recording
waivers against test results.
Fedora Account System Username: mjia

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphslib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1441023




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023
[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources
to binary
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440992] Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean operations on paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1441023




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023
[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources
to binary
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources to binary

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1433757, 1435230, 1440992




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757
[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphslib - A bridge from Glyphs
source files to UFOs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435230
[Bug 1435230] Review Request: python-ufo2ft - A bridge from UFOs to
FontTool objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992
[Bug 1440992] Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean operations
on paths
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1435230] Review Request: python-ufo2ft - A bridge from UFOs to FontTool objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435230

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1441023




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023
[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources
to binary
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441023] New: Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources to binary

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023

Bug ID: 1441023
   Summary: Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from
sources to binary
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: athoscribe...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-fontmake.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-fontmake-1.2.3-1.fc25.src.rpm

Description:
This library provides a wrapper for several other Python libraries which
together compile fonts from various sources (.glyphs, .ufo) into binaries
(.otf, .ttf).

Fedora Account System Username:athoscr

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440704] Review Request: cpprest - C++ REST SDK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704

Robin Lee  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||robinlee.s...@gmail.com
 Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841
[Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a
sponsor
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1435230] Review Request: python-ufo2ft - A bridge from UFOs to FontTool objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435230



--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
New version:

Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-ufo2ft.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-ufo2ft-0.4.2-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433121] Review Request: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-prometheus - Prometheus monitoring for your gRPC Go servers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433121

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 21:48:52



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-go-grpc-prometheus-1.1-0.1.git6b7015e.el6 has been
pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist,
please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1272174] Review Request: golang-github-pmezard-go-difflib - Partial port of Python difflib package to Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272174

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 21:48:45



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-pmezard-go-difflib-0-0.6.gitd8ed262.el6 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 6 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1278803] Review Request: godep - Dependency tool for go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1278803
Bug 1278803 depends on bug 1272174, which changed state.

Bug 1272174 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-pmezard-go-difflib - Partial 
port of Python difflib package to Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1272174

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphslib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757



--- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
Version update:

Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-glyphslib.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-glyphslib-1.6.0-1.fc25.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417



--- Comment #71 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2345652754

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440968] Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1440992




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992
[Bug 1440992] Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean operations
on paths
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440992] Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean operations on paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1440968




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968
[Bug 1440968] Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A
setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440992] New: Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean operations on paths

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440992

Bug ID: 1440992
   Summary: Review Request: python-booleanOperations - Boolean
operations on paths
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: athoscribe...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-booleanOperations.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-booleanOperations-0.7.0-1.fc25.src.rpm

Description:
Boolean operations on paths based on a super fast polygon clipper library by
Angus Johnson.

Fedora Account System Username: athoscr

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440406] Review Request: thermald - Thermal Management daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440406

Jens Lody  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Jens Lody  ---
Package is approved.

I personally would like to see it in Fedora, no matter if it has a
systemd-preset or not.

So feel free to add it and probably add the preset later (if the request will
be accepted).

Jens

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417



--- Comment #70 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01f5202c66

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #69 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7e4ee54060

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427585] Review Request: golang-github-vitrun-qart - Generator of not-so-ugly QR codes

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427585

Fabio Valentini  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2017-04-10 17:41:03



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
Bug 1427634 depends on bug 1427585, which changed state.

Bug 1427585 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-vitrun-qart - Generator of 
not-so-ugly QR codes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427585

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440378] Review Request: pantheon-greeter - Pantheon' s LightDM Login Screen

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440378



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
pantheon-greeter-3.1.1-4.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440968] Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1440971




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971
[Bug 1440971] Review Request: python-pyclipper  - Cython wrapper for the
C++ translation of the Angus Johnson's Clipper library
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440971] Review Request: python-pyclipper - Cython wrapper for the C++ translation of the Angus Johnson 's Clipper library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971

Athos Ribeiro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1440968




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968
[Bug 1440968] Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A
setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440971] New: Review Request: python-pyclipper - Cython wrapper for the C++ translation of the Angus Johnson 's Clipper library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971

Bug ID: 1440971
   Summary: Review Request: python-pyclipper  - Cython wrapper for
the C++ translation of the Angus Johnson's Clipper
library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: athoscribe...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-pyclipper.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-pyclipper-1.0.6-1.fc25.src.rpm

Description:
Pyclipper is a Cython wrapper exposing public functions and classes of the C++
translation of the Angus Johnson's Clipper library.

Fedora Account System Username: athoscr

python-pyclipper.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) Cython -> Python
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440968] New: Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440968

Bug ID: 1440968
   Summary: Review Request: python-setuptools_scm_git_archive - A
setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git
archives
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: athoscribe...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-setuptools_scm_git_archive.spec
SRPM URL:
https://athoscr.fedorapeople.org/packaging/python-setuptools_scm_git_archive-1.0-1.fc25.src.rpm
koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18915781

Description:
This is a setuptools_scm plugin that adds support for git archives (for example
the ones GitHub automatically generates).

Fedora Account System Username: athoscr

NOTE: python-setuptools_scm complains about not using pypi sources (even when
using pypi sources). By refering to setuptools_scm documentation, I set an env
variable where the package can get the version from. During the installation
process it creates eggs for version ZERO of the package, which I removed after
%%install.

python-setuptools_scm_git_archive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US)
setuptools -> setup tools, setup-tools, toadstools
python-setuptools_scm_git_archive.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) scm ->
cm, scam, scum
python-setuptools_scm_git_archive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
setuptools -> setup tools, setup-tools, toadstools
python-setuptools_scm_git_archive.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US
scm -> cm, scam, scum
1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341



--- Comment #25 from Miro Hrončok  ---
(In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #24)
> The package has documentation as well which must be built.

Should, not must.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1336168] Review Request: git-lfs - Git extension for versioning large files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1336168

Warren Togami  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||wtog...@gmail.com



--- Comment #6 from Warren Togami  ---
Any update on this?  git-lfs is v2.0.2 upstream.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440138] Review Request: slick-greeter - LightDM slick Greeter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440138



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
lightdm-settings-1.0.2-3.fc25 slick-greeter-1.0.0-12.fc25 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2fcf9b9763

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440240] Review Request: lightdm-settings - Configuration tool for the LightDM display manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440240



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
lightdm-settings-1.0.2-3.fc25 slick-greeter-1.0.0-12.fc25 has been submitted as
an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2fcf9b9763

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1357677] Review Request: python-rfc3987 - Parsing and validation of URIs (RFC 3986) and IRIs ( RFC 3987)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1357677



--- Comment #5 from Athos Ribeiro  ---
ping :)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673



--- Comment #11 from Per Bothner  ---
(In reply to Jonny Heggheim from comment #8)
> It would be great if you can test Kawa by following the steps described in
> /usr/share/doc/openjfx/README.fedora

I did that.  Results:

I was able to build Kawa from source, with the --with-javafx configure flag
(which requires some javafx packages).

I was able to run some simple Kawa-Scheme JavaFX GUI demo scripts.

I was not able to use the -wjavafx option.  That should open a REPL console
(using DomTerm http://domterm.org/) in a fresh WebView:

$ bin/kawa -wjavafx
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: javafx/scene/web/WebView
at org.domterm.javafx.WebTerminalApp.createScene(WebTerminalApp.java:68)
at org.domterm.javafx.WebTerminalApp.start(WebTerminalApp.java:154)
at
com.sun.javafx.application.LauncherImpl.lambda$launchApplication1$8(LauncherImpl.java:863)
at
com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.lambda$runAndWait$7(PlatformImpl.java:326)
at
com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.lambda$null$5(PlatformImpl.java:295)
at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native Method)
at
com.sun.javafx.application.PlatformImpl.lambda$runLater$6(PlatformImpl.java:294)
at
com.sun.glass.ui.InvokeLaterDispatcher$Future.run(InvokeLaterDispatcher.java:95)
at com.sun.glass.ui.gtk.GtkApplication._runLoop(Native Method)
at
com.sun.glass.ui.gtk.GtkApplication.lambda$null$5(GtkApplication.java:139)
at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)
Caused by: java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: javafx.scene.web.WebView
at java.net.URLClassLoader.findClass(URLClassLoader.java:381)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:424)
at sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:331)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadClass(ClassLoader.java:357)
... 11 more
Exception in Application start method
Application stop called

The same bin/kawa -wjavafx command, using the same Kawa build, worked fine
using with Oracle's JDK in the PATH.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
featherpad-0.6-0.1.git20170401.7325229.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ec17848af5

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
featherpad-0.6-0.1.git20170401.7325229.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-8293bedaca

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark-0-1.20170201.fc26 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ad34bcb38a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark-0-1.20170201.fc25 has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9bcf8b763e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
openbox-theme-mistral-thin-0-1.20170125.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-88c9fea2a3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
openbox-theme-mistral-thin-0-1.20170125.fc25 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-9ef7ec8890

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440378] Review Request: pantheon-greeter - Pantheon' s LightDM Login Screen

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440378

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:03:45



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
pantheon-greeter-3.1.1-4.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440240] Review Request: lightdm-settings - Configuration tool for the LightDM display manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440240

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:03:27



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
cinnamon-3.2.8-18.fc26, lightdm-settings-1.0.2-3.fc26,
slick-greeter-1.0.0-10.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1428914] Review Request: php-sebastian-object-enumerator3 - Traverses array and object to enumerate all referenced objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428914

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:02:59



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-sebastian-object-enumerator3-3.0.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440138] Review Request: slick-greeter - LightDM slick Greeter

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440138

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:03:24



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
cinnamon-3.2.8-18.fc26, lightdm-settings-1.0.2-3.fc26,
slick-greeter-1.0.0-10.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1348202] Review Request: rubygem-pcaprub - libpcap bindings for ruby

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1348202
Bug 1348202 depends on bug 1371845, which changed state.

Bug 1371845 Summary: enable tests
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1371845

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1426972] Review Request: hugo - A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love in GoLang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972
Bug 1426972 depends on bug 1394576, which changed state.

Bug 1394576 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-PuerkitoBio-purell - Tiny Go 
library to normalize URLs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394576

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1394576] Review Request: golang-github-PuerkitoBio-purell - Tiny Go library to normalize URLs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1394576

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:02:10



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-PuerkitoBio-purell-1.1.0-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433744] Review Request: python-mutatormath - Python library for piecewise linear interpolation in multiple dimensions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433744
Bug 1433744 depends on bug 1433626, which changed state.

Bug 1433626 Summary: Review Request: python-defcon - A set of flexible objects 
for representing UFO data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433626

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433757] Review Request: python-glyphslib - A bridge from Glyphs source files to UFOs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433757
Bug 1433757 depends on bug 1433626, which changed state.

Bug 1433626 Summary: Review Request: python-defcon - A set of flexible objects 
for representing UFO data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433626

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1433626] Review Request: python-defcon - A set of flexible objects for representing UFO data

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433626

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-04-10 12:01:28



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-defcon-0.3.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427634] Review Request: syncthing - Continuous File Synchronization

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427634
Bug 1427634 depends on bug 1428951, which changed state.

Bug 1428951 Summary: packaged version too old for syncthing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428951

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/openbox-theme-mistral-thin

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/featherpad

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440406] Review Request: thermald - Thermal Management daemon

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440406



--- Comment #5 from Björn "besser82" Esser  ---
Updated package:


Koji build:

  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18908688


Urls:

  Spec URL: 
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/thermald.spec
  SRPM URL: 
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/thermald-1.6-0.4.fc27.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in
 /home/besser82/vm_shared/fedora/review/1440822-openbox-theme-mistral-
 thin-dark/licensecheck.txt

 ---> License is fine.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI 

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[-]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Unknown or generated". 12 files have unknown license. Detailed
 output of licensecheck in
 /home/besser82/vm_shared/fedora/review/1440819-openbox-theme-mistral-
 thin/licensecheck.txt

 ---> License is fine.

[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in 

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated


Issues:
===
- All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that
  are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
  Note: These BR are not needed: gcc-c++
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2

  ---> BRs are fine, guidelines changed some time ago.

- update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
  contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
  Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in featherpad
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
  database

  ---> Discouraged for Fedora 24+.  False positive.


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 54 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/besser82/vm_shared/fedora/review/1440542-featherpad/licensecheck.txt

 ---> License is fine.

[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: gtk-update-icon-cache is invoked in %postun and %posttrans if package
 contains icons.
 Note: icons in featherpad
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
 desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation 

[Bug 1440542] Review Request: featherpad - Lightweight Qt5 Plain-Text Editor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440542

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|besse...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440822] New: Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark - Mistral Dark theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440822

Bug ID: 1440822
   Summary: Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark -
Mistral Dark theme for Openbox
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lupi...@mailbox.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark.spec
SRPM URL:
https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/openbox-theme-mistral-thin-dark-0-1.20170201.fc25.src.rpm

Koji scratch build (Rawhide):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18907032

Description: Mistral Thin theme for the Openbox window manager, dark variant.

Fedora Account System Username: lupinix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440819] New: Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral Thin theme for Openbox

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440819

Bug ID: 1440819
   Summary: Review Request: openbox-theme-mistral-thin - Mistral
Thin theme for Openbox
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: lupi...@mailbox.org
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/openbox-theme-mistral-thin.spec
SRPM URL:
https://lupinix.fedorapeople.org/review/openbox-theme-mistral-thin-0-1.20170125.fc25.src.rpm

Koji scratch build (rawhide):
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18907011

Description: Mistral Thin theme for the Openbox window manager.

Fedora Account System Username: lupinix

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1427341] Review Request: python-gamera - Gamera is a framework for building document analysis applications.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341



--- Comment #24 from Charalampos Stratakis  ---
So after some discussions with Miro and running the fedora-review tool we
figured out some more things.

The devel subpackage should be named python2-gamera-devel and this macro should
be used to provide the python namespace for it (similar to the main package):

%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{srcname}-devel}

The package bundles some software as well as it can be seen from these
directories:

https://github.com/hsnr-gamera/gamera/tree/master/src
https://github.com/hsnr-gamera/gamera/tree/master/include

It bundles vigra, zlib, eo, libpng and libtiff (hope I didn't miss anything).
The zlib folders should be removed during prep (from the Include and src
subdirs) and instead a BuildRequires for the zlib-devel package should be used.

Same for libpng-1.2.5 and libtiff folders.

As for the rest of the bundled software, they should be provided as virtual
provides according to:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries?rd=Packaging:Bundled_Libraries

So you will need to add at the main package:
Provides: bundled(vigra) = 1.6.0
Provides: bundled(eo) = 1.3.1

Also there is an executable bit which should be removed during prep from:

/include/plugins/deformations.hpp

The package has documentation as well which must be built. I checked the
sources and docs are being generated by executing the file gendoc.py. Then it
should be be placed at a separate subpackage, named python2-gamera-doc, with a
similar naming pattern as the devel subpackage.

I still haven't figured out the best way to do that, as gamera uses itself to
build the documentation, so some environment variable will have to be exported
during build. I will conduct some more testing and let you know.

Now about the license.

From the fedora-review output:
Licenses found: "LGPL (v2)", "*No copyright* LGPL (v2 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or
later)", "GPL (v2 or later)", "CC by-sa GPL", "Unknown or generated", "MIT/X11
(BSD like)", "NTP", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) NTP", "zlib/libpng", "LGPL", "GPL (v2
or later) (with incorrect FSF address)"

The final license of the package (indicated at the License field) should be
"GPLv2+ and MIT and CC BY-SA" (thanks Miro), however I will need to dig a bit
deeper to verify that, so don't change the field yet.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440780] New: Review Request: mod_http2 - module implementing HTTP/ 2 for Apache 2

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440780

Bug ID: 1440780
   Summary: Review Request: mod_http2 - module implementing HTTP/2
for Apache 2
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: luhli...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://luhliarik.fedorapeople.org/mod_http2.spec
SRPM URL: https://luhliarik.fedorapeople.org/mod_http2-1.10.0-1.fc23.src.rpm
Description: The mod_h2 Apache httpd module implements the HTTP2 protocol
(h2+h2c) on top of libnghttp2 for httpd 2.4 servers.
Fedora Account System Username: luhliarik

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1415777] Review Request: python-tinyrpc - A modular RPC library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1415777

Scott Lewis  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Target Milestone|--- |rc



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1432538] Review Request: libnsl2 - Public client interface library for NIS(YP) and NIS+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432538



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libnsl2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1414216] Review Request: php-gettext-gettext - PHP gettext manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414216



--- Comment #14 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/php-gettext-gettext

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1401451] Package Review: pcb2gcodeGUI - A GUI for pcb2gcode

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401451



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pcb2gcodeGUI

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1401450] Review Request: pcb2gcode - Command-line software for the isolation, routing and drilling of PCBs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1401450



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/pcb2gcode

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 967782] Review Request: jailkit - A set of utilities to limit Chroot

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=967782

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
   Assignee|besse...@fedoraproject.org  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review-
   |needinfo?(besser82@fedorapr |
   |oject.org)  |
Last Closed||2017-04-10 07:25:42



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 870853] Review Request: haven - Next Generation Backup System

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=870853

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|besse...@fedoraproject.org  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |
   |needinfo?(besser82@fedorapr |
   |oject.org)  |
   |needinfo?(dben...@gmail.com |
   |)   |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1016221] Review Request: courier-authlib - The Courier authentication library provides authentication services for other Courier applications.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016221

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
   Assignee|besse...@fedoraproject.org  |nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Flags|fedora-review?  |
   |needinfo?(besser82@fedorapr |
   |oject.org)  |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1129677] Review Request: gstreamer1-rtsp-server - gstreamer rtsp server version 1.x

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1129677

Björn "besser82" Esser  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(besser82@fedorapr |
   |oject.org)  |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1432538] Review Request: libnsl2 - Public client interface library for NIS(YP) and NIS+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432538

Petr Kubat  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+
   |needinfo?(pku...@redhat.com |
   |)   |



--- Comment #4 from Petr Kubat  ---
Hi Matej,

I think you are right in that it might fit the Mixed Source Licensing scenario
more than the Multiple License scenario. In that case I have no issues with the
package getting through as is since it seems there is no mention of a breakdown
having to be present in the guidelines.

It would however be nice to have a mention in the spec file somewhere that this
is a mixed source licensed library.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1437986] Review Request: python-pyaes - Pure-Python implementation of AES block-cipher and common modes of operation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437986

Peter Lemenkov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1440717




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440717
[Bug 1440717] Upgrade electrum to ver. 2.8.2
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1432538] Review Request: libnsl2 - Public client interface library for NIS(YP) and NIS+

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432538

Matej Mužila  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(mmuz...@redhat.co |needinfo?(pku...@redhat.com
   |m)  |)



--- Comment #3 from Matej Mužila  ---
Hi,

I think that breakdown to multiple packages or stating which part of the
package is licensed under which license is not possible, because the library
(libnsl.so.2.0.0) is compiled from files under multiple licenses. I think this
fits to the Mixed Source Licensing Scenario [1].

I think that the only thyng I could do about licensing is to state licensing of
individual files in -devel subpackage.


[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#Mixed_Source_Licensing_Scenario

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440704] Review Request: cpprest - C++ REST SDK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704



--- Comment #1 from c72...@yahoo.de ---
- This is my first package and I would need a sponsor.
- Link to successful Koji build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18795939

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440704] New: Review Request: cpprest - C++ REST SDK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440704

Bug ID: 1440704
   Summary: Review Request: cpprest - C++ REST SDK
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: c72...@yahoo.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://copr-dist-git.fedorainfracloud.org/cgit/c72578/cpprest/cpprest.git/diff/cpprest.spec?h=f25
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/c72578/cpprest/fedora-25-x86_64/00536482-cpprest/
copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/c72578/cpprest/
Description:
The C++ REST SDK is a Microsoft project for cloud-based client-server
communication in native code using a modern asynchronous C++ API design. This
project aims to help C++ developers connect to and interact with services. 

Fedora Account System Username: c72578

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440687] New: Review Request: shc - Shell script compiler

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440687

Bug ID: 1440687
   Summary: Review Request: shc - Shell script compiler
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: moc...@hotmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/4KR7XgHHB-04eSPbMjfAJV5M1UNdIGYhyRLivL9gydE=/raw
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/moceap/Ojuba/fedora-25-x86_64/00538037-shc/shc-3.9.3-1.fc25.src.rpm
Description: Shell script compiler
Fedora Account System Username: moceap

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1438673] Review Request: openjfx - Rich client application platform for Java

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1438673



--- Comment #10 from Jonny Heggheim  ---
(In reply to Per Bothner from comment #9)
> When I install the openjfx package, I expect it to work.  I do not expect to
> have to look for an obscure README, and have to install some other
> mysterious package.

This README is intended for Fedora packagers and not end users. 

> Whatever happens behind the scenes with magic links and alternates is one
> thing, but I as a user should not have to do anything more complicated than
> "sudo dnf install openjfx".

The openjdk sub-package will provide this functionality, but that package have
not been made.

Please take part in bug 1145303 if you have found a better way to package
openjfx.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669

Paul Howarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||p...@city-fan.org



--- Comment #28 from Paul Howarth  ---
Hi, I requested an EPEL-7 branch for this package as it's an optional
dependency of the proftpd test suite. I don't know if you're interested in EPEL
at all, so I'm happy to maintain the EPEL-7 branch myself if you're not
interested. I'm also happy to co-maintain the package if you like.

Cheers, Paul.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417



--- Comment #68 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2345652754

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417



--- Comment #67 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-01f5202c66

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1403417] Review Request: gsequencer - audio processing engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1403417



--- Comment #66 from Fedora Update System  ---
gsequencer-0.7.122.20-0.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7e4ee54060

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1429680] Container Review Request: httpd - Platform for running Apache HTTP Server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429680

Tomas Repik  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #4 from Tomas Repik  ---
All good but the BZcomponent label. If you want to keep the
com.redhat.component label it's 0K, however, I would include the BZcomponent
label as well.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org