[Bug 1427185] Review Request: zypper - Command line package manager from SUSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427185 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- zypper-1.13.22-1.fc26 libzypp-16.6.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ba82706aa3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427182] Review Request: libzypp - A package management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427182 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- zypper-1.13.22-1.fc26 libzypp-16.6.1-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-ba82706aa3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427182] Review Request: libzypp - A package management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427182 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427185] Review Request: zypper - Command line package manager from SUSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427185 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1375986] Review Request: golang-github-klauspost-cpuid - CPU feature identification for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375986 --- Comment #10 from Matthias Runge--- sorry for the delay, and thank you for your patience SPEC: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/golang-github-klauspost-cpuid.spec SRPM: http://www.matthias-runge.de/fedora/golang-github-klauspost-cpuid-1.0-1.src.rpm scratch-build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19055443 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-19.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-56b4c757c7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-067b202929 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter-0-0.1.20170209.git09b3cfd.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0b67dfff19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System--- libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-28e7fc0b45 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-7da348eda5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4080d8884 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter-0-0.1.20170209.git09b3cfd.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5cea2dc37b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libgsignon-glib -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-de3fe47b79 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427185] Review Request: zypper - Command line package manager from SUSE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427185 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/zypper -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1427182] Review Request: libzypp - A package management library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427182 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/libzypp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #4 from Neal Gompa--- Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: ldconfig called in %post and %postun if required. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* LGPL (v2.1)", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL (v2.1)", "Unknown or generated". 52 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/makerpm/1442853-libgsignon- glib/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0, /usr/share/vala/vapi, /usr/share/gir-1.0, /usr/share/vala [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in libgsignon-glib-debuginfo [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]:
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Neal Gompa --- Looks good to me. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Issues are fixed, same links. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1432230] Review Request: ampy - Command line tool to interact with a MicroPython board over a serial connection
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1432230 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2017-03-22 15:21:34 |2017-04-17 16:51:53 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- ampy-1.0.1-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa--- A few issues: > Requires: dbus%{?isa} > Requires: gsignond%{?isa} The macro should be "%{?_isa}". > %packagedevel > Summary:GSignOn daemon development files The summary is wrong for this library. > %files devel > %{_bindir}/gsso-example Move this into its own subpackage, as it doesn't depend on the devel content at all, and isn't needed for devel stuff. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377762] Review Request: opendht - A lightweight C++11 Distributed Hash Table implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377762 --- Comment #7 from Benjamin Lefoul--- Thanks Adrien. I'll update the spec directly to 1.3.1 then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442853] New: Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442853 Bug ID: 1442853 Summary: Review Request: libgsignon-glib - GLib API for the SSO framework Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgsignon-glib.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/libgsignon-glib-2.4.1-1.20161228.git03d9c64.fc26.src.rpm Description: This project is a library for managing single signon credentials which can be used from GLib applications. It is effectively a GLib binding for the D-Bus API provided by gsignond. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19048060 PS: The additional support for python is not enabled on purpose, since it only supports python2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System--- gsignond-1.0.6-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-85a6084eee -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System--- gsignond-1.0.6-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-4cfec99e64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang-1.0.0-1.20170314.git0fd242d.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6261d56f95 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini--- I've reported a bug about the setgroups / setuid usage upstream at: https://gitlab.com/accounts-sso/gsignond/issues/11 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang-1.0.0-1.20170314.git0fd242d.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-55388bed37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang-1.0.0-1.20170314.git0fd242d.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-43dcb207fa -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #30 from Fedora Update System--- superlu_dist-5.1.3-2.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-ba85d2bc21 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System--- superlu_dist-5.1.3-2.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5a231b6b8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System--- superlu_dist-5.1.3-2.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cbc1eb72fc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System--- superlu_dist-5.1.3-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e2b96ce208 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1398400] Review Request: superlu_dist - Solution of large, sparse, nonsymmetric systems of linear equations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398400 --- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System--- superlu_dist-5.1.3-2.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-4b1f4593ad -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1424482] Review Request: sge - Son of Grid Engine - Distributed Computing Management software
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424482 Dave Lovechanged: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|dave.l...@manchester.ac.uk --- Comment #2 from Dave Love --- Sorry, I'd missed this. I should take it, but I probably can't be very responsive in the near future. Why is this a separate project from gridengine? I'd have thought that should just be based on newer sources, and I think an old installation could be upgraded. I need to try to get a release out with accumulated changes, but there's at least on regression in 8.1.9 which probably deserves patching in the packaging. I've long been meaning to merge the Fedora spec with the /opt-based one too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/gsignond -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-ccding-go-stun-0-0.1.20170323.git04a4eed.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-f8fc1bd3f5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-ccding-go-stun-0-0.1.20170323.git04a4eed.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-cc5bb1bc3a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-ccding-go-stun-0-0.1.20170323.git04a4eed.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-685af345e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-cznic-b-0-0.1.20170413.git6955404.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-900cdba78a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-cznic-b-0-0.1.20170413.git6955404.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e740cb75e8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-cznic-b-0-0.1.20170413.git6955404.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-d0f8f446c6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1414216] Review Request: php-gettext-gettext - PHP gettext manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414216 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2017-04-17 11:54:29 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- php-gettext-gettext-3.5.9-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter-0-0.1.20170209.git09b3cfd.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-a0940eda30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter-0-0.1.20170209.git09b3cfd.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-5cea2dc37b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter-0-0.1.20170209.git09b3cfd.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0b67dfff19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 Neal Gompachanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Neal Gompa --- Aside from the already known issues, fedora-review is happy with it. PACKAGE APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini--- Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442804] New: Review Request: nodejs-to-regex-range - Returns a regex-compatible range from two numbers , min and max
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442804 Bug ID: 1442804 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-to-regex-range - Returns a regex-compatible range from two numbers, min and max Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1387531 (Node-RED) Spec URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-to-regex-range/nodejs-to-regex-range.spec SRPM URL: https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-to-regex-range/nodejs-to-regex-range-1.0.2-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Returns a regex-compatible range from two numbers, min and max Fedora Account System Username: jsmith Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806 [Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387531 [Bug 1387531] Package tracker for supporting Node-RED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #4 from Athos Ribeiro --- Package looks good now! Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Spec URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang.spec SRPM URL: https://decathorpe.fedorapeople.org/packages/golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang-1.0.0-1.20170314.git0fd242d.fc26.src.rpm - Redundant conditional removed - Release: tag fixed - updated to newer snapshot For now I would rather not include another git repository snapshot tarball for the test data. Maybe I'll add it in the future, if there is demand for enabling the tests. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-ccding-go-stun -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-cznic-b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini--- Thanks for the review, I've already incorporated fixes for the issues you've pointed out in the linked .spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431763] Review Request: golang-github-oschwald-geoip2-golang - GeoIP2 lookup library for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431763 --- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro--- Hi Fabio, I am taking this one. - Conditional clauses on line 144 are duplicated. - The guidelines for post releases have changed [1], in special, the release tag for post release should not be in X.Y format (use just the X) and the date the snapshot was taken must be included there. - The test data could be included as a separate source file, but that's not a blocker here. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-de3fe47b79 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433617] Review Request: python-proselint - A linter for prose
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433617 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver--- Spec URL: https://pagure.io/python-proselint/raw/master/f/python-proselint.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c4080d8884 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System--- golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli-1.0.0-1.20140727.git7f561c7.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-067b202929 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 Fedora Update Systemchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Thanks for the review, I've already incorporated fixes for the issues you've pointed out in the linked .spec file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1364170] Review Request: nodejs-expand-range - Fast, bash-like range expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364170 --- Comment #2 from Jared Smith--- *** Bug 1433775 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433776] Review Request: nodejs-expand-range - Expand a range of numbers or letters, uppercase or lowercase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433776 Jared Smithchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2017-04-17 10:21:17 --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1364170 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1433775] Review Request: nodejs-expand-range - Expand a range of numbers or letters, uppercase or lowercase
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433775 Jared Smithchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||jsmith.fed...@gmail.com Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2017-04-17 10:21:49 --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1364170 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1364170] Review Request: nodejs-expand-range - Fast, bash-like range expansion
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364170 Jared Smithchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1433764 CC||hho...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Jared Smith --- *** Bug 1433776 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433764 [Bug 1433764] Tracker for packaging nodemon and dependencies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini--- Thanks for the review, I've already incorporated fixes for the issues you've pointed out in the linked .spec file. I will leave the unit test-specific parts of the .spec file (even though they are disabled), since it's easier to enable unit tests that way if upstream decides to add some in the future. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1437389] Review Request: golang-github-ccding-go-stun - STUN client ( RFC 3489 and RFC 5389) implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1437389 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hello Fabio, I am taking this one. Conditionals on line 130 are duplicated. This could be fixed to clean up the spec file. The Release tag must be updated to comply with the guidelines. Note that this is a must item [1] Other than that, the package looks good. I will approve the package and trust you will perform the necessary changes. Approved. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Versioning Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[Bug 986550] Review Request: python-xmp-toolkit - Python toolkit for working with XMP metadata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986550 Parag AN(पराग)changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431741] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-b - B+ Tree implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431741 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hello Fabio, I am taking this review. - The Revision shuld be updated to reflect new guidelines. For pre-releases packages, the date MUST be included in the tag. - The conditional in line 142 seems to be duplicated, that could be fixed to clean up the spec file. Other than that, the package looks good. I will trust you will perform the necessary changes before uploading the package. Approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]:
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #7 from Fabio Valentini--- - added: Requires: dbus%{?isa} - removed asterisk from doc directory - filed bug about setuid / file caps upstream at [1] [1]: https://gitlab.com/accounts-sso/gsignond/issues/10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 615669] Review Request: perl-Crypt-Cracklib - perl module to interact with libcrack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=615669 --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System--- perl-Crypt-Cracklib-1.7-19.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-56b4c757c7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 --- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro--- Also, consider changing the revision tag with the new guidelines, including the date the snapshot was taken. Sorry for the spam :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434421] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-pfilter - Simple Packet Filtering package written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434421 Athos Ribeirochanged: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Athos Ribeiro --- Hello Fabio, I am taking this one. - The conditional statement on line 29 seems to be duplicated. - There's no test suite available for the package. The macro with all the unit-tests subpackage entries is disabled. You may want to consider cleaning the duplications. The package looks good. Approved. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [?]: Package functions as described. [?]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all
[Bug 1367033] Review Request: dumb-init - entrypoint wrapper for docker that pass signal and handle zombies
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1367033 Jonny Heggheimchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2017-04-17 09:17:37 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 986550] Review Request: python-xmp-toolkit - Python toolkit for working with XMP metadata
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=986550 Lars Kiesowchanged: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Flags|needinfo?(lkie...@uos.de) | Last Closed||2017-04-17 09:15:19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #6 from Neal Gompa--- Issues: >[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gir-1.0, /usr/share > /gtk-doc, /usr/share/dbus-1, /usr/share/vala/vapi, > /usr/share/dbus-1/services, /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gsignond, > /usr/share/gtk-doc/html, /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0, > /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces, /usr/share/vala Some of the ownership issues can be ignored (like /usr/share/vala, /usr/share/vala/vapi, /usr/share/gtk-doc, /usr/share/gtk-doc/html, /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0). However, gsignond needs a runtime requires for dbus%{?_isa}, as it is necessary for its functionality to be useful. The doc subpackage file entry needs the asterisk removed, because it's preventing RPM from considering that it should own /usr/share/gtk-doc/html/gsignond too. >Rpmlint: > gsignond.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-setgroups-before-setuid /usr/bin/gsignond Apparently, gsignond was a setuid binary on purpose. In the code, it uses seteuid() in daemon/main.c and common/gsignond-storage-manager.c. However, it seems to gracefully fail when it does that. That said, apparently it's not doing setegid() before using seteuid() in common/gsignond-storage-manager.c (or in the ostro/tizen code, but I don't care much about them). From what I can tell, it's setuid so that it can drop privileges as a daemon and set storage directories to be individually owned by specific users. In Fedora, we prefer if this can function with file capabilities, as they are more granular and when used well, can limit the damage caused by vulnerabilities to privileged applications. Please file a bug upstream to see if this can be appropriately resolved. Action items: * Fix the directory ownership issues * File a bug upstream about the rpmlint error and to request gsignond to work with file caps instead. - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/RemoveSETUID - https://www.mankier.com/7/capabilities -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441222] Review Request: qtermwidget-qt4 - Qt4 terminal widget
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441222 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/qtermwidget-qt4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431761] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli - Small library for building CLI apps in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431761 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla--- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-cli -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442743] Review Request: python-bz2file - Read and write bzip2-compressed files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442743 Björn "besser82" Esserchanged: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1124239 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1124239 [Bug 1124239] python-gensim-2.0.0 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442743] New: Review Request: python-bz2file - Read and write bzip2-compressed files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442743 Bug ID: 1442743 Summary: Review Request: python-bz2file - Read and write bzip2-compressed files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: besse...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Description: bz2file is a Python library for reading and writing bzip2-compressed files. It contains a drop-in replacement for the file interface in the standard library’s bz2 module, including features from the latest development version of CPython that are not available in older releases. Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19040607 Issues: No known issues. Rpmlint has some false positive complaints. FAS-User: besser82 Urls: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/python-bz2file.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/python-bz2file-0.98-0.1.fc27.src.rpm Thanks for review in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1409647] Review Request: libimagequant - Palette quantization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 --- Comment #11 from Sergio Monteiro Basto--- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #10) > Ah indeed, looks like libimagequant isn't an integral part of pngquant, but > simply bundled. just since 2.8.x -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1442547] Review Request: gsignond - GSignOn daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442547 --- Comment #5 from Fabio Valentini--- I think I have incorporated fixes for all the issues you pointed out. Also, I have disabled the Ostro OS and Tizen extensions. Links are the same. New scratch build, with noarch -doc and -defautl-config subpackages: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=19040060 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1409647] Review Request: libimagequant - Palette quantization library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mani--- Ah indeed, looks like libimagequant isn't an integral part of pngquant, but simply bundled. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1368911] Review Request: python-mpd2 - It is a Python library which provides a client interface for MPD
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1368911 --- Comment #3 from Parag AN(पराग)--- any updates here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1381430] Review Request: python3-prctl - Python(ic) interface to the linux prctl syscall
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1381430 --- Comment #7 from Parag AN(पराग)--- any updates here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1294216] Review Request: xcape - Use a modifier key as a different key when quickly pressed and released
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1294216 Parag AN(पराग)changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|panem...@gmail.com |nob...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? | --- Comment #4 from Parag AN(पराग) --- Sorry I am just clearing bug tracker to give preference to priority bugs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1317286] Review Request: hunspell-ie - Interlingue hunspell dictionary
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1317286 Parag AN(पराग)changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|needinfo?(mistresssilvara@h | |otmail.com) | Last Closed||2017-04-17 03:32:47 --- Comment #8 from Parag AN(पराग) --- No updates here, Closing this review. If needed please reopen this review. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1428693] Review Request: netpgp - Freely licensed PGP implementation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1428693 --- Comment #9 from Parag AN(पराग)--- Any updates here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org