[Bug 1441728] Review Request: cld2 - Compact Language Detector 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728 c72...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #17 from c72...@yahoo.de --- Dear Jan, thank you very much for your review. In the meantime I have been sponsored into the packager group. Best regards Wolfgang -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1441728] Review Request: cld2 - Compact Language Detector 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441728 c72...@yahoo.de changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review+ | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404883] Review Request: python-aiosmtpd - Asyncio-based SMTP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-aiosmtpd-1.0-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19db6a5d92 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404883] Review Request: python-aiosmtpd - Asyncio-based SMTP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #3 from Yunying Sun --- Thanks Robert-Andre for the first review. With current upstream code base, tpm2-abrmd.service is installed at /usr/lib64/systemd/system/tpm2-abrmd.service, not /lib/systemd/system. I created a ticket for upstream: https://github.com/01org/tpm2-abrmd/issues/115, and will update SPEC once this issue is fixed or clarified. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421605] Container Review Request: nginx - Platform for running nginx or building nginx-based application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421605 Pavel Zhukov changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(hho...@redhat.com ||) --- Comment #10 from Pavel Zhukov --- Any progress? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 Zamir SUN changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||Tracking -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #4 from Yunying Sun --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > Hello, > > A couple of points first: > > - Systemd service files should be installed in %{_unitdir}. See > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Systemd#Filesystem_locations > Hi Robert-Andre, one question here, without upstream change, is it possible to set a different systemd service file installation path in spec file, to override the upstream default(/usr/lib64/systemd/system/)? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Yes, in %install just move from the file from %{buildroot}/%{_libdir}/systemd/system/tpm2-abrmd.service to %{buildroot}/%{_unitdir} -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1460759] Review Request: python-daiquiri - Library to configure Python logging easily
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759 --- Comment #6 from Alfredo Moralejo --- official package review: Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Apache", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 15 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1460759-python- daiquiri/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages, /usr/lib/python3.6 [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-daiquiri , python3-daiquiri , python-daiquiri-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: Packages should try to preserve times
[Bug 1460759] Review Request: python-daiquiri - Library to configure Python logging easily
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460759 Alfredo Moralejo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flags|needinfo?(karlthered@gmail. |fedora-review+ |com)| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #6 from Yunying Sun --- Thanks Robert. I've updated SPEC & SRPMS to address the issues in comment 2: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-abrmd.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-abrmd-1.1.0-2.el7.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20917523 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #2 from Sandro Mani --- Thanks for the comments and sorry for the late reply, I was trying to get the tests working with upstream - still having some issues. Uhm why obsoletes qt-creator? Qbs is currently a subpackage of qt-creator, it's that package that should be obsoleted, not the entire qt-creator. Or am I missing something? Current version: SPEC: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/qbs.spec SRPM: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/qbs-1.8.1-2.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1473663] Review Request: perl-Shell-Guess - Make an educated guess about the shell in use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473663 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1457737] Review Request: rubygem-overcommit - Git hook manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457737 Bug 1457737 depends on bug 1457735, which changed state. Bug 1457735 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-iniparse - Ruby library for parsing INI documents https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457735 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1457735] Review Request: rubygem-iniparse - Ruby library for parsing INI documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1457735 František Dvořák changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW) Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Flags|fedora-review? | |needinfo?(steve.traylen@cer | |n.ch) | Last Closed||2017-07-31 07:23:23 --- Comment #3 from František Dvořák --- This review seems dead, closing according to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews . Please reopen, if needed. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449 [Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter response should be blocking this bug. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 --- Comment #17 from Dominic Hopf --- Somehow the dependency management is a bit confusing to me today. Until today I was assuming that everything I BuildRequire is a Require afterwards anyway. The perl(Net::SSH2) requirement actually is there, defined as BuildRequires. But that obviously wasn't enough, for whatever reason I didn't understand. I now explicitly list that Require in the spec file, along with some other stuff. Not sure why I need to mention those explicitly when the requirement to AWS::Signature4 was generated automagically. Probably something within the upstream build system I need to dig even deeper. Spec URL: https://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/Rex/Rex.spec SRPM URL: https://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/Rex/Rex-1.4.1-6.fc26.src.rpm RPM URL: https://dmaphy.fedorapeople.org/Rex/Rex-1.4.1-6.fc26.noarch.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476014] Review Request: icemon - Icecream GUI monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014 --- Comment #8 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/icemon -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419317] Review Request: deepin-terminal - terminal emulation application
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419317 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-terminal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1419332] Review Request: deepin-shortcut-viewer - deepin shortcut viewer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419332 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-shortcut-viewer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1421041] Review Request: deepin-gettext-tools - Deepin Gettext Tools
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421041 --- Comment #9 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/deepin-gettext-tools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470656] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/perl-Regexp-Stringify -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476773] New: Review Request: python-subunit2sql - Command to Read a subunit file or stream and put the data in a SQL DB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773 Bug ID: 1476773 Summary: Review Request: python-subunit2sql - Command to Read a subunit file or stream and put the data in a SQL DB Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: chkumar...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-subunit2sql.spec SRPM URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-subunit2sql-1.8.0-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: subunit2SQL is a tool for storing test results data in a SQL database. Like it's name implies it was originally designed around converting subunit streams to data in a SQL database and the packaged utilities assume a subunit stream as the input format. However, the data model used for the DB does not preclude using any test result format. Additionally the analysis tooling built on top of a database is data format agnostic. However if you choose to use a different result format as an input for the database additional tooling using the DB api would need to be created to parse a different test result output format. It's also worth pointing out that subunit has several language library bindings available. So as a user you could create a small filter to convert a different format to subunit. Fedora Account System Username: chandankumar Successful Koji Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20919605 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1473663] Review Request: perl-Shell-Guess - Make an educated guess about the shell in use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473663 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Shell-Guess-0.06-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(File::Spec) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Unix::Process) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Shell-Guess-0.06-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Shell::Guess) = 0.06 1 perl-Shell-Guess = 0.06-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Shell-Guess* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476773] Review Request: python-subunit2sql - Command to Read a subunit file or stream and put the data in a SQL DB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773 Matthias Runge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||mru...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|mru...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Matthias Runge --- taking for review -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476014] Review Request: icemon - Icecream GUI monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- icemon-3.1.0-5.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6952a04673 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476014] Review Request: icemon - Icecream GUI monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1120788] Review Request: Rex - Tool for Automation, Remote Execution and Configuration Deployment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1120788 Robin Lee changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #18 from Robin Lee --- This package is approved by cheeselee. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 --- Comment #10 from Fabio Valentini --- The previously missing dependencies have now been pushed to the rawhide repositories and to the mirrors (which took some time due to the mass rebuild). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1474333] Review Request: perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline - Parser for INI files with line continuations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474333 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] New: Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 Bug ID: 1476790 Summary: Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: chkumar...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-stestr.spec SRPM URL: https://chandankumar.fedorapeople.org/python-stestr-0.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm Description: stestr is a fork of the testrepository that concentrates on being a dedicated test runner for python projects. The generic abstraction layers which enabled testr to work with any subunit emitting runner are gone. stestr hard codes python-subunit-isms into how it works. Fedora Account System Username: chandankumar Successful scratch Build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20921089 Note: python-subunit2sql package review is here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476325] python-stestr: A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476325 Chandan Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2017-07-31 09:24:16 --- Comment #1 from Chandan Kumar --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1476790 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 Chandan Kumar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||chku...@redhat.com --- Comment #1 from Chandan Kumar --- *** Bug 1476325 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Blocks||1427510 (RDO-PIKE) Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|karlthe...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 [Bug 1427510] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1471806] Review Request: danmaQ - A small client side Qt program to play danmaku on any screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806 --- Comment #5 from Zamir SUN --- Updated. Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ.spec SRPM URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm > danmaQ-debuginfo.x86_64: E: debuginfo-without-sources After several hours test, I assume this is a bug with fedora-review. I assume you configured your mock to use rawhide. If so, you can see it will generate a danmaQ-debugsource-0.2-1.fc27.x86_64.rpm in results dir, while rpmlint currently don't detect this one. RPMlint passed on Fedora 26. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1474333] Review Request: perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline - Parser for INI files with line continuations
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474333 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are ok $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline-1.001-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Config::INI::Reader) >= 0.024 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline-1.001-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Config::INI::Reader::Multiline) = 1.001 1 perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline = 1.001-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Config-INI-Reader-Multiline* 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. Rpmlint is ok The package looks good. Approved -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476489] Review Request: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin - Panel area status notifier plugin for Xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489 --- Comment #2 from Zamir SUN --- Hi, thanks for the review. > - If you're installing a .desktop file, you must validate it in %check: IMO this is not a general desktop file. It is for xfce use only. I checked various xfce plugins, and none of them implement a validate. For example, http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfce4-calculator-plugin.git/tree/xfce4-calculator-plugin.spec http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/xfce4-battery-plugin.git/tree/xfce4-battery-plugin.spec What's more, it will fail to rpmbuild if a validate is added. > - debuginfo-without-sources: The same as I stated in 1471806, rpmlint passed on Fedora 26. > - hardcoded-library-path: I know where this comes from. I have a line > mv %{buildroot}/usr/lib %{buildroot}/%{_libdir} I find the plugin always goes into /usr/lib regardless of architecture, so I hardcoded a mv here. The static library problem is fixed. Updated in place. Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin.spec SRPM URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc26.src.rpm HTH. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476773] Review Request: python-subunit2sql - Command to Read a subunit file or stream and put the data in a SQL DB
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476773 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||karlthe...@gmail.com Blocks||1427510 (RDO-PIKE) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427510 [Bug 1427510] Tracker: Blockers and Review requests for new RDO Pike packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 Haïkel Guémar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Haïkel Guémar --- I noted that running tests will require python-subunit2sql to be reviewed first. I hereby approve this package into Fedora Packages Collection, please proceed with pkgdb request. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* Apache", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 38 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/haikel/1476790 -python-stestr/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files. [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local Python: [x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build process. [x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should provide egg info. [x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python [x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel [x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep = SHOULD items = Generic: [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2-stestr , python3-stestr , python-stestr-doc [x]: Package functions as described. [x]: Latest version is packaged. [x]: Package does not include license text files
[Bug 1471806] Review Request: danmaQ - A small client side Qt program to play danmaku on any screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806 --- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine. Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476489] Review Request: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin - Panel area status notifier plugin for Xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- >What's more, it will fail to rpmbuild if a validate is added Why would that be? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1474392] Review Request: perl-Test-Exec - Test that some code calls exec without terminating testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474392 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jples...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jples...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1474392] Review Request: perl-Test-Exec - Test that some code calls exec without terminating testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474392 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Source file is ok Summary is ok License is ok Description is ok URL and Source0 are ok All tests passed BuildRequires are almost ok FIX: Please add build-requires 'make' $ rpm -qp --requires perl-Test-Exec-0.04-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(base) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) 1 perl(Return::MultiLevel) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(Test2::API) >= 1.302015 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -qp --provides perl-Test-Exec-0.04-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort | uniq -c 1 perl(Test::Exec) = 0.04 1 perl-Test-Exec = 0.04-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ rpmlint ./perl-Test-Exec* perl-Test-Exec.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval -> veal, vela, val perl-Test-Exec.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US eval -> veal, vela, val 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. Rpmlint is ok Please correct 'FIX' issue. Otherwise the package looks good. Approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470656] Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||perl-Regexp-Stringify-0.06- ||1.fc27 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2017-07-31 11:21:52 --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova --- Thank you for the review and the repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Bug 1470678 depends on bug 1470656, which changed state. Bug 1470656 Summary: Review Request: perl-Regexp-Stringify - Stringify a Regexp object https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470656 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1471806] Review Request: danmaQ - A small client side Qt program to play danmaku on any screen
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471806 --- Comment #7 from Zamir SUN --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #6) > Ah indeed, I compiled locally insted of fedora-review and it passed fine. > > Just one thing: you should use desktop-file-validate in %check. Done. Spec URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ.spec SRPM URL: https://zsun.fedorapeople.org/pub/pkgs/danmaQ/danmaQ-0.2-1.fc26.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476489] Review Request: xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin - Panel area status notifier plugin for Xfce4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476489 --- Comment #4 from Zamir SUN --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > >What's more, it will fail to rpmbuild if a validate is added > > Why would that be? It shows > + desktop-file-validate > /home/zsun/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/share/xfce4/panel/plugins/statusnotifier.desktop > /home/zsun/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/share/xfce4/panel/plugins/statusnotifier.desktop: > error: first group is not "Desktop Entry" > /home/zsun/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin-0.1.0-1.fc26.x86_64/usr/share/xfce4/panel/plugins/statusnotifier.desktop: > error: file contains group "Xfce Panel", but groups extending the format > should start with "X-" > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YFI6nz (%install) And if I look into the desktop file, it is not actually a desktop file format, just a file with .desktop suffix. > [Xfce Panel] > Type=X-XFCE-PanelPlugin > Encoding=UTF-8 > Name=Status Notifier Plugin > Comment=Provides a panel area for status notifier items (application > indicators) > Icon=xfce4-statusnotifier-plugin > X-XFCE-Module=statusnotifier > X-XFCE-Unique=TRUE > X-XFCE-Internal=FALSE > X-XFCE-API=2.0 > ~ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- dnf does not care which srpm a subpackage is built from. But there's no qbs package with a version < 0:4.4.0, so the Obsoletes line right now does nothing. But there's a different consideration: when upgrading, users who had qt-creator-4.2.rpm installed, should get *both* qt-creator-4.4.rpm and qbs.rpm. For that to happen, you make both packages obsolete the old name: qt-creator: Obsoletes: %{name} < 0:4.4.0 qbs: Obsoletes: qt-creator < 0:4.4.0 Then when upgrading, dnf should install both subpackages. At least that's what happened at some time with yum and should happen with dnf. There are bugs open for some corner cases, it seems it doesn't always work, but doing this better than nothing: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1261034, "Scenario C". > http://wiki.qt.io/Qbs → https:// > http://download.qt.io/official_releases/ → https:// Still there. Package is APPROVED. Please fix the http URL when uploading. I think you should add the Obsoletes, push qt-creator-4.4 and qbs in a single bodhi update, and test if the upgrades work as expected. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/python-stestr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #4 from Sandro Mani --- The qbs subpackage is only f27+ with qt-creator-4.3.x, see [1]. This actually makes it tricky now that I think of it though, since Obsoleting qbs will work fine for current rawhide users, but users updating from f26 to f27 will indeed hit the scenario you describe. So I think I actually have to obsolete both qt-creator and qbs? [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8039 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #5 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- OK, I wasn't aware of the subpackage in rawhide. But this doesn't really change anything: dnf doesn't care from what srpm a binary subpackage originates. So when you just move the subpackage from qt-creator to a new srpm, nothing needs to be done (and the Obsoletes is not useful but harmless). So yeah, I still think you need to add the two Obsoletes as described for F26→F27+ upgrades. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434749] Review Request: si-units - International System of Units ( JSR 363)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434749 Lukas Berk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1429804] Review Request: parfait - Java libraries for Performance Co-Pilot (PCP)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1429804 Lukas Berk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #6 from Sandro Mani --- Okay, thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1434744] Review Request: uom-lib - Java Units of Measurement Libraries (JSR 363)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1434744 Lukas Berk changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lb...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 756780] Review Request: xosd - On-screen display library for X
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756780 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed|2012-01-30 04:49:21 |2017-07-31 12:20:33 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- xosd-2.2.14-24.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 Athos Ribeiro changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #11 from Athos Ribeiro --- Is there any reason for the second license file not being under %license? Package looks good. Approved! As part of the review swap email, if you can, it would be great to get hugo review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476458] Review Request: paho-c - MQTT client library in C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476458 --- Comment #6 from Otavio R. Piske --- > Sorry for not pointing this out earlier, but I just consulted the Licensing > Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#Valid_License_Short_Names Thanks for pointing this out. I adjusted the License text as explained. Latest Koji build is available here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20925743 Copr build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/orpiske/paho-testing/build/585162/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 --- Comment #12 from Fabio Valentini --- Thank you for the review! I'll have a look at hugo. > Is there any reason for the second license file not being under %license? Yes. Writing "%license LICENSE" and "%license foo/bar/LICENSE" will result in the second LICENSE file overwriting the first one, since they are copied to the same location (%{_licensedir}/%{name}). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1426972] Review Request: hugo - A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love in GoLang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||decatho...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|decatho...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 --- Comment #13 from Athos Ribeiro --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #12) > Thank you for the review! I'll have a look at hugo. > > > Is there any reason for the second license file not being under %license? > > Yes. Writing "%license LICENSE" and "%license foo/bar/LICENSE" will result > in the second LICENSE file overwriting the first one, since they are copied > to the same location (%{_licensedir}/%{name}). Oh, I didn't now that. Will it happen even in this case, where the second license name is LICENSE.sometring ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1426972] Review Request: hugo - A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love in GoLang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426972 --- Comment #25 from Fabio Valentini --- I have found some issues: 1) The latest release is 0.25.1. Please update your package (v0.24) for the latest version. 2) The "-unit-test-devel" subpackage Requires "%{name}-devel" (which doesn't exist, and leads to installation errors), and this should be replaced by "golang-%{provider}-%{project}-%{repo}-devel". 3) The "-devel" subpackage doesn't own all directories that it should ("/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo" - the hugo sources root directory - and all subdirectories of it are unowned [1]). This shouldn't happen when you use the scripts generated by gofed. 4) You should use %global instead of %define in line 32 of the .spec file according to the packaging guidelines. Otherwise, the package looks good. [1] Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/helpers, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/commands, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/inflect, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/i18n, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/create, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/collections, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/releaser, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/tplimpl, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/math, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/transform, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/cast, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/strings, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/transform, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/safe, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/media, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/crypto, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/bufferpool, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/hugolib, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/fmt, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/data, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/cache, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com, (this is expected) /usr/share/gocode/src, (this is expected) /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/output, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/internal, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/compare, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/hugofs, /usr/share/gocode, (this is expected) /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/source, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/encoding, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/os, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/parser, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/time, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/lang, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/partials, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/images, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com/gohugoio/hugo/tpl/urls -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 --- Comment #14 from Fabio Valentini --- Well, in this case, I explicitly copied the file to a *different* filename myself, because both files are named "LICENSE" in the tarball, which would generate a conflict. Using something like %license LICENSE %license foo/bar/LICENSE-foobar should work just fine though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1431748] Review Request: golang-github-cznic-ql - Embedded SQL database written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431748 --- Comment #15 from Gwyn Ciesla --- Package request has been approved: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/golang-github-cznic-ql -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476438] Review Request: clustersos - collect multiple sosreports simultaneously
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476438 --- Comment #4 from Jake Hunsaker --- I forgot to mention in c0, I will need a sponsor as this is my first package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476014] Review Request: icemon - Icecream GUI monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- icemon-3.1.0-5.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-76dcb9041c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani --- Uhm, Problem 1: both package qbs-1:1.9.0-0.1.gita2fd0f3.fc27.x86_64 and qt-creator-4.4.0-0.1.beta1.fc27.x86_64 obsolete qt-creator < 4.4.0 - cannot install the best update candidate for package qbs-4.3.1-2.fc27.x86_64 Would that be one of the issues in #1261034? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #8 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek --- What was the command that gave this error? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475483] Review Request: qbs - Cross platform build tool
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475483 --- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani --- Just a plain # dnf update By the way, since there is a DSO dependency /usr/lib64/qtcreator/plugins/libQbsProjectManager.so -> libqbscore.so.1.8 it is already taken care of that updating qt-creator will also install the new qbs. So actually I think no Obsoletes are even necessary. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404883] Review Request: python-aiosmtpd - Asyncio-based SMTP server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404883 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-aiosmtpd-1.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-19db6a5d92 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476014] Review Request: icemon - Icecream GUI monitor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476014 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- icemon-3.1.0-5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-6952a04673 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434 --- Comment #4 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> --- (In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0) Sorry for changing URLs again Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585332-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585332-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Rpmlint may complain about "shared-lib-calls-exit /usr/lib64/libbstrsafe.so.1.0.0 exit@GLIBC_2.2.5" The exit call is necessary for the safe moduli to function as it can terminate execution while returning an error code -1 when the standard string library was accidentally called. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #7 from Yunying Sun --- %changelog * Tue Aug 1 2017 Sun Yunying - 1.1.0-3 - Use config option with-systemdsystemunitdir to set systemd unit file location Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/yunyings/share/master/tpm2-abrmd.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-abrmd-1.1.0-2.el7.src.rpm Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20938040 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1475228] Review Request: tpm2-abrmd - TPM2 access broker and resource manager daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1475228 --- Comment #8 from Yunying Sun --- SRPM URL should be: https://github.com/yunyings/share/raw/master/tpm2-abrmd-1.1.0-3.el7.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ppi...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ppi...@redhat.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1470678] Review Request: perl-Data-Dmp - Dump Perl data structures as Perl code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470678 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- URL and Source0 addresses are Ok. Source0 archive (SHA-256: f2b326d703fb845d9dffd3b8b46d6c5d461143ac8f0f3c94d555ed294f0daf21) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Data/Dmp.pm. Ok. TODO: Remove the space in `compact , starts' in the description. License verified from lib/Data/Dmp.pm and LICENSE. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. FIX: Build-require `perl(blib)' for tests (t/00-compile.t:19). Test::Pod, Test::Pod::Coverage, and Pod::Coverage::TrustPod are not used. Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Data-Dmp.spec ../SRPMS/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.src.rpm ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.noarch.rpm perl-Data-Dmp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Stringify -> Stringy perl-Data-Dmp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regexes -> regexps, regex's, reg exes perl-Data-Dmp.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coderefs -> code refs, code-refs, recorders perl-Data-Dmp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US Stringify -> Stringy perl-Data-Dmp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US regexes -> regexps, regex's, reg exes perl-Data-Dmp.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US coderefs -> code refs, code-refs, recorders 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 6 warnings. rpmlint is Ok. $ rpm -q -lv -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Dmp -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2742 Jan 30 2017 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Dmp/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 5076 Jan 30 2017 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Dmp/README drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Dmp/devscripts -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1127 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/doc/perl-Data-Dmp/devscripts/bench drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Data-Dmp -rw-r--r--1 rootroot18367 Jan 30 2017 /usr/share/licenses/perl-Data-Dmp/LICENSE -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 4287 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/man/man3/Data::Dmp.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 Aug 1 08:20 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Data -rw-r--r--1 rootroot11944 Jan 30 2017 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Data/Dmp.pm File layout and permissions are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.26.0) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.10.1 1 perl(B::Deparse) 1 perl(Exporter) 1 perl(Regexp::Stringify) 1 perl(Scalar::Util) 1 perl(strict) 1 perl(warnings) 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(Data::Dmp) = 0.23 1 perl-Data-Dmp = 0.23-1.fc27 Binary provides are Ok. $ resolvedeps f27-build ../RPMS/noarch/perl-Data-Dmp-0.23-1.fc27.noarch.rpm Binary dependencies resolvable. Ok. Package builds in F27 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20938874). Ok. Otherwise the package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Please correct the `FIX' item and consider fixing the `TODO' item before building this package. Resolution: Package APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1404043] Review Request: rdma-core - RDMA core userspace libraries and daemons
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404043 --- Comment #34 from Honggang LI --- (In reply to Jarod Wilson from comment #30) > And now the build fails on ppc64le, while successful on all other arches: > > bin/ib_acme: error while loading shared libraries: > /builddir/build/BUILD/rdma-core-14/lib/libibverbs.so.1: expected > localentry:0 `pthread_cond_init' > error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X6YP93 (%install) > RPM build errors: > Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.X6YP93 (%install) > > For the time being, I've thrown a quick hack into the package to make it at > least build, and we can debug from there, with the caveat that the ppc64le > package is at least partially broken at runtime. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474973#c3 Jarod, please revert this hack as issue had been fixed. Thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python-stestr-0.5.0-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0c9fb7977a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476790] Review Request: python-stestr - A test runner runner similar to testrepository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476790 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1476434] Review Request: Bstrlib - Better String Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1476434 --- Comment #5 from Ye Cheng <18969068...@163.com> --- (In reply to Ye Cheng from comment #0) Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585360-bstrlib/bstrlib.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/yecheng/bstrlib/fedora-rawhide-i386/00585360-bstrlib/bstrlib-1.0.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Adding a dedicated %check section -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org