[Bug 1497797] Review Request: gst-devtools - Development and debugging tools for GStreamer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497797

Luya Tshimbalanga  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Luya Tshimbalanga  ---
Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "GPL", "LGPL (v2.1 or later)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v3
 or later)", "Unknown or generated". 
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/validate
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gstreamer-1.0,
 /usr/lib64/gstreamer-1.0/validate
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
 Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gtk-doc(harfbuzz-
 devel, gimp-devel, p11-kit-devel), /usr/share/gtk-doc/html(harfbuzz-
 devel, gimp-devel, p11-kit-devel), /usr/lib64/girepository-1.0(vte3,
 gspell, libgepub, gnome-autoar, libgee, libzapojit, libchamplain,
 gsound, gobject-introspection, libmypaint, libgnome-keyring, libgtop2,
 gmime30, libgdata, gcr, tracker, libxklavier, gdk-pixbuf2, gst-
 transcoder, at-spi2-core, gtk2, gtk3, GConf2, appstream, gnome-
 bluetooth-libs, libgdl, grilo, gfbgraph, atk, libpeas, vte291, gnome-
 online-accounts, gucharmap-libs), /usr/share/gir-1.0(gtk2-devel, at-
 spi2-core-devel, gtk3-devel, atk-devel, gdk-pixbuf2-devel)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 604160 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package 

[Bug 823226] Review Request: sqlheavy - GObject wrapper for SQLite

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=823226

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
Last Closed||2017-10-04 23:39:59



--- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
It doesn't seem like anyone replied.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498220] Review Request: nodejs-dicer - A very fast streaming multipart parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498220

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-04 23:37:43



--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith  ---
In rawhide, closing bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498225] Review Request: nodejs-busboy - A streaming parser for HTML form data for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498225
Bug 1498225 depends on bug 1498220, which changed state.

Bug 1498220 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-dicer - A very fast streaming 
multipart parser for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498220

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498271] Review Request: nodejs-hex-to-array-buffer - Turn a string of hexadecimal characters into an .

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498271
Bug 1498271 depends on bug 1498264, which changed state.

Bug 1498264 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-arraybuffer-equal - Determines if 
two array buffers contain the exact same content
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498264

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498264] Review Request: nodejs-arraybuffer-equal - Determines if two array buffers contain the exact same content

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498264

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-04 23:35:42



--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith  ---
In rawhide, closing bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1431637] Review Request: python-fypp - Fortran preprocessor

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431637

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #5 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
I can reproduce the failures in mock and out, but your latest srpm link is
broken.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1419715] Review Request: hwcrypto-native - enable digital signature for Chrome and Firefox > 52

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1419715

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Upstream link https://github.com/hwcrypto/hwcrypto-native now redirects to
https://github.com/web-eid/web-eid which has an empty master branch. The
coverity_scan contains something of substance, but I don't really know what
upstream is doing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1440971] Review Request: python-pyclipper - Cython wrapper for the C++ translation of the Angus Johnson 's Clipper library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1440971

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
 Whiteboard||NotReady
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 806117] Review Request: python-oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |NOTABUG



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 806117] Review Request: python-oplop - Generate account passwords based on account nicknames

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806117

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
 Blocks||201449 (FE-DEADREVIEW)
 Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
  Flags|fedora-review?  |
Last Closed||2017-10-04 23:05:01



--- Comment #25 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
It seems not.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=201449
[Bug 201449] FE-DEADREVIEW -- Reviews stalled due to lack of submitter
response should be blocking this bug.
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1055838] Review Request: ghc-time-compat - Compatibility with old-time for the time package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055838

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1198196] Review Request: ghc-auto-update - Efficiently run periodic, on-demand actions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198196

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
 Whiteboard||AwaitingSubmitter
  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1055838] Review Request: ghc-time-compat - Compatibility with old-time for the time package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055838

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Whiteboard||BuildFails



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1414807] Review Request: ghc-doctemplates - Pandoc-style document templates

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1414807

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
No apparent issues; APPROVED.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (3 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 5 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 1414807-ghc-doctemplates/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 81920 bytes in 13 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text 

[Bug 1055838] Review Request: ghc-time-compat - Compatibility with old-time for the time package

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055838

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
> %doc LICENSE

Should be changed to %license now, or it doesn't build. Probably want to
regenerate with latest template as well.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 3 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 1055838-ghc-time-compat/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[-]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 12 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is 

[Bug 1497549] Review Request: tio - Simple TTY terminal I/O application

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497549



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
tio-1.24-2.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2017-6700053853

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498706] Review Request: ghc-http2 - HTTP/2 library including frames, priority queues and HPACK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498706

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498699




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498699
[Bug 1498699] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498706] New: Review Request: ghc-http2 - HTTP/ 2 library including frames, priority queues and HPACK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498706

Bug ID: 1498706
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-http2 - HTTP/2 library including
frames, priority queues and HPACK
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http2.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-http2-1.6.3-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
HTTP/2 library including frames, priority queues and HPACK.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498706] Review Request: ghc-http2 - HTTP/2 library including frames, priority queues and HPACK

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498706



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22260327

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498694] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha256 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-256 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498694

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498703




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498703
[Bug 1498703] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498704] Review Request: ghc-hackage-security - Hackage security library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498704



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22260298

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498704] Review Request: ghc-hackage-security - Hackage security library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498704

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498703




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498703
[Bug 1498703] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498702] Review Request: ghc-ed25519 - Ed25519 cryptographic signatures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498702

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498703




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498703
[Bug 1498703] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498704] New: Review Request: ghc-hackage-security - Hackage security library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498704

Bug ID: 1498704
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-hackage-security - Hackage
security library
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-hackage-security.spec
SRPM URL:
http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-hackage-security-0.5.2.2-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
The hackage security library provides both server and client utilities for
securing the Hackage package server (https://hackage.haskell.org/). It is
based on The Update Framework (https://theupdateframework.com/), a set of
recommendations developed by security researchers at various universities in
the US as well as developers on the Tor project (https://www.torproject.org/).

The current implementation supports only index signing, thereby enabling
untrusted mirrors. It does not yet provide facilities for author package
signing.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498702] Review Request: ghc-ed25519 - Ed25519 cryptographic signatures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498702



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22260261

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498702] New: Review Request: ghc-ed25519 - Ed25519 cryptographic signatures

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498702

Bug ID: 1498702
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-ed25519 - Ed25519 cryptographic
signatures
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-ed25519.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-ed25519-0.0.5.0-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
This package provides a simple, fast, self-contained copy of the Ed25519
public-key signature system with a clean interface. It also includes support
for detached signatures, and thorough documentation on the design and
implementation, including usage guidelines.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498686] Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498686

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1498683




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498683
[Bug 1498683] Review Request: ghc-appar - A simple applicative parser
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498683] Review Request: ghc-appar - A simple applicative parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498683

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498686




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498686
[Bug 1498686] Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1198196] Review Request: ghc-auto-update - Efficiently run periodic, on-demand actions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198196

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498699




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498699
[Bug 1498699] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498689] Review Request: ghc-psqueues - Pure priority search queues

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498689

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498699




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498699
[Bug 1498699] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498683] Review Request: ghc-appar - A simple applicative parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498683

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498699




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498699
[Bug 1498699] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498686] Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498686

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498699




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498699
[Bug 1498699] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498685] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha1 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-1 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498685

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498698




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498698
[Bug 1498698] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498692] Review Request: ghc-uuid-types - Type definitions for Universally Unique Identifiers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498692

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498698




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498698
[Bug 1498698] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498684] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-md5 - Fast, pure and practical MD5 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498684

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498698




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498698
[Bug 1498698] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1485491] Review Request: ghc-network-info - Access the local computer 's basic network configuration

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485491

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498698




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498698
[Bug 1498698] Unbundle subpackages
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498694] New: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha256 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-256 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498694

Bug ID: 1498694
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha256 - Fast, pure and
practical SHA-256 implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-sha256.spec
SRPM URL:
http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-sha256-0.11.100.1-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
A practical incremental and one-pass, pure API to the SHA-256 hash algorithm
(including HMAC support) with performance close to the fastest implementations
available in other languages.

NOTE: This package has been forked off 'cryptohash-0.11.7' because the
'cryptohash' package has been deprecated and so this package continues to
satisfy the need for a lightweight package providing the SHA256 hash algorithm
without any dependencies on packages other than 'base' and 'bytestring'.

Consequently, this package can be used as a drop-in replacement for
cryptohash's "Crypto.Hash.SHA256" module, though with a clearly smaller
footprint.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498694] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha256 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-256 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498694



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22260052

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498691] Review Request: ghc-StateVar - State variables

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498691

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498693




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498693
[Bug 1498693] Unbundle ghc-StateVar
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498692] Review Request: ghc-uuid-types - Type definitions for Universally Unique Identifiers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498692



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22260023

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1452985] Review Request: rakudo-zef - Perl6 Module Management

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1452985

Gerd Pokorra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CURRENTRELEASE
Last Closed||2017-10-04 20:20:31



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498692] New: Review Request: ghc-uuid-types - Type definitions for Universally Unique Identifiers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498692

Bug ID: 1498692
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-uuid-types - Type definitions for
Universally Unique Identifiers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-uuid-types.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-uuid-types-1.0.3-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
This library contains type definitions for Universally Unique Identifiers and
basic conversion functions. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UUID for the
general idea.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498691] Review Request: ghc-StateVar - State variables

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498691



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259998

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498691] New: Review Request: ghc-StateVar - State variables

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498691

Bug ID: 1498691
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-StateVar - State variables
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-StateVar.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-StateVar-1.1.0.4-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
This package contains state variables, which are references in the IO monad,
like IORefs or parts of the OpenGL state.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 925993] Review Request: ghc-yesod-core - Yesod core library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=925993



--- Comment #7 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
clientsession is now available in Rawhide if you can update this.

This review is for an outdated version at the moment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498689] Review Request: ghc-psqueues - Pure priority search queues

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498689



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259966

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498689] New: Review Request: ghc-psqueues - Pure priority search queues

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498689

Bug ID: 1498689
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-psqueues - Pure priority search
queues
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-psqueues.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-psqueues-0.2.4.0-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
The psqueues package provides Priority Search Queues> in three different
flavors. Each of the three implementations provides the same API, so they can
be used interchangeably. Typical applications of Priority Search Queues
include:

* Caches, and more specifically LRU Caches;

* Schedulers;

* Pathfinding algorithms, such as Dijkstra's and A*.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498686] Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498686



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259958

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498686] New: Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498686

Bug ID: 1498686
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-iproute - IP Routing Table
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-iproute.spec
SRPM URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-iproute-1.7.1-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
IP Routing Table is a tree of IP ranges to search one of them on the longest
match base. It is a kind of TRIE with one way branching removed. Both IPv4 and
IPv6 are supported.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498685] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha1 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-1 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498685



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259914

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498684] New: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-md5 - Fast, pure and practical MD5 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498684

Bug ID: 1498684
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-md5 - Fast, pure and
practical MD5 implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-md5.spec
SRPM URL:
http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-md5-0.11.100.1-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
A practical incremental and one-pass, pure API to the MD5 hash algorithm
(including HMAC support) with performance close to the fastest implementations
available in other languages.

NOTE: This package has been forked off 'cryptohash-0.11.7' because the
'cryptohash' package has been deprecated and so this package continues to
satisfy the need for a lightweight package providing the MD5 hash algorithm
without any dependencies on packages other than 'base' and 'bytestring'.

Consequently, this package can be used as a drop-in replacement for
cryptohash's "Crypto.Hash.MD5" module, though with a clearly smaller footprint.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498684] Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-md5 - Fast, pure and practical MD5 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498684



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259906

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498685] New: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha1 - Fast, pure and practical SHA-1 implementation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498685

Bug ID: 1498685
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cryptohash-sha1 - Fast, pure and
practical SHA-1 implementation
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-sha1.spec
SRPM URL:
http://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cryptohash-sha1-0.11.100.1-1.fc26.src.rpm

Description:
A practical incremental and one-pass, pure API to the SHA-1 hash algorithm
(including HMAC support) with performance close to the fastest implementations
available in other languages.

NOTE: This package has been forked off 'cryptohash-0.11.7' because the
'cryptohash' package has been deprecated and so this package continues to
satisfy the need for a lightweight package providing the SHA1 hash algorithm
without any dependencies on packages other than 'base' and 'bytestring'.

Consequently, this package can be used as a drop-in replacement for
cryptohash's "Crypto.Hash.SHA1" module, though with a clearly smaller
footprint.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1198196] Review Request: ghc-auto-update - Efficiently run periodic, on-demand actions

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1198196

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package is outdated. Please update to the latest release. Also, the
description should be updated with something reasonable.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498683] Review Request: ghc-appar - A simple applicative parser

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498683



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
This package built on koji: 
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=22259839

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498220] Review Request: nodejs-dicer - A very fast streaming multipart parser for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498220
Bug 1498220 depends on bug 1498217, which changed state.

Bug 1498217 Summary: Review Request: nodejs-streamsearch - Streaming 
Boyer-Moore-Horspool searching for node.js
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498217

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498217] Review Request: nodejs-streamsearch - Streaming Boyer-Moore-Horspool searching for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498217

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2017-10-04 18:54:49



--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith  ---
In rawhide, closing bug

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498677] Review Request: nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form - Test data intended to be used by people building query parsers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498677

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498326




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498326
[Bug 1498326] Review Request: nodejs-multer - Middleware for handling
multipart/form-data
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498677] New: Review Request: nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form - Test data intended to be used by people building query parsers

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498677

Bug ID: 1498677
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form - Test
data intended to be used by people building query
parsers
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews), 1387531 (Node-RED)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form/nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form/nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form-0.2.1-1.fc28.src.rpm
 
Description: Test data intended to be used by people building query parsers
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1387531
[Bug 1387531] Package tracker for supporting Node-RED
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498294] Review Request: nodejs-fs-temp - A quick and simple way to create temporary files and directories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498294



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-fs-temp

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498326] Review Request: nodejs-multer - Middleware for handling multipart/form-data

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498326

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1498677



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Up until today, the testdata-w3c-json-form package didn't have any sort of
license, so I couldn't include it.  Luckily, the author cut a new release today
under the MIT license.


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498677
[Bug 1498677] Review Request: nodejs-testdata-w3c-json-form - Test data
intended to be used by people building query parsers
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498240] Review Request: nodejs-append-field - A W3C HTML JSON forms spec compliant field appender

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498240



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-append-field

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498240] Review Request: nodejs-append-field - A W3C HTML JSON forms spec compliant field appender

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498240

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #4 from Jared Smith  ---
Requested package in ticket
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/1984

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498225] Review Request: nodejs-busboy - A streaming parser for HTML form data for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498225



--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-busboy

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498225] Review Request: nodejs-busboy - A streaming parser for HTML form data for node.js

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498225

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Requested package in ticket
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/1983

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297536] Review Request: golang-github-gocql-gocql - A fast and robust Cassandra client

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297536



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-gocql-gocql

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297529] Review Request: golang-github-fatih-structs - Utilities for Go structs

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297529



--- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-fatih-structs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1498294] Review Request: nodejs-fs-temp - A quick and simple way to create temporary files and directories

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498294

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Requested package in ticket
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/1982

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1497797] Review Request: gst-devtools - Development and debugging tools for GStreamer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1497797



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
Thanks!  Almost all fixed.  I think only-non-binary-in-usr-lib needs to be that
way.

SRPM:
https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-devtools/gst-devtools-1.12.3-2.fc28.src.rpm
SPEC: https://fedorapeople.org/~limb/review/gst-devtools/gst-devtools.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482261] Review Request: gr-iio - GNU Radio interface for IIO

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482261



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
gr-iio-0.2-3.20170705git54c86a5.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1375383] Review Request: arachne-pnr - Place and route for FPGA compilation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1375383



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
arachne-pnr-0.1-0.3.20170628git7e135ed.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1470358] Review Request: php-jms-serializer - Library for (de-) serializing data of any complexity

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1470358



--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-jms-serializer-1.8.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494259] Review Request: python-pygments-style-solarized - Solarized style plugin for Pygments

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494259

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-04 18:21:54



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pygments-style-solarized-0.1.1-2.1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494869] Review Request: golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-kcp-go - Full-featured reliable UDP communication library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494869



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-AudriusButkevicius-kcp-go-0-0.1.20170902.gitd17218b.fc26 has been
pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please
make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1494018] Review Request: erlang-fuse - A Circuit Breaker for Erlang

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494018



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
erlang-fuse-2.4.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376412] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable - Colorable writer for windows.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2017-10-04 18:21:35



--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-mattn-go-colorable-0-0.5.20170816gitad5389d.fc26 has been pushed
to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note
of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1377229] Review Request: golang-github-inconshreveable-log15 - Structured, composable logging for Go

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377229
Bug 1377229 depends on bug 1376412, which changed state.

Bug 1376412 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable - 
Colorable writer for windows.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1376437] Review Request: golang-github-fatih-color - Color package for Go (golang)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376437
Bug 1376437 depends on bug 1376412, which changed state.

Bug 1376412 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable - 
Colorable writer for windows.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1485907] Review Request: rubygem-rack-attack - Block & throttle abusive requests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485907



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-rack-attack-5.0.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1487877] Review Request: ocaml-result - Compat result type

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1487877



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
ocaml-result-1.2-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1430147] Review Request: golang-github-mgutz-logxi - A 12-factor app logger built for performance and happy development

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430147
Bug 1430147 depends on bug 1376412, which changed state.

Bug 1376412 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable - 
Colorable writer for windows.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1430146] Review Request: golang-github-mgutz-ansi - Small, fast library to create ANSI colored strings and codes.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430146
Bug 1430146 depends on bug 1493760, which changed state.

Bug 1493760 Summary: go-colorable import path points to gopkg.in instead of 
github.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1493760

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1482246] Review Request: libad9361 - Library for access to Analog Devices AD9361 radio IC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482246



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
libad9361-0-0.2.20170207git6027674.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1430146] Review Request: golang-github-mgutz-ansi - Small, fast library to create ANSI colored strings and codes.

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430146
Bug 1430146 depends on bug 1376412, which changed state.

Bug 1376412 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-go-colorable - 
Colorable writer for windows.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376412

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1485907] Review Request: rubygem-rack-attack - Block & throttle abusive requests

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485907



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-rack-attack-5.0.1-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1474301] Review Request: rubygem-aws-sigv4 - AWS Signature Version 4 library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1474301



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
rubygem-aws-sigv4-1.0.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1297532] Review Request: golang-github-hailocab-go-hostpool - Intelligently and flexibly pool among multiple hosts from your Go application

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1297532



--- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-hailocab-go-hostpool

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1430127] Review Request: golang-github-denisenkom-go-mssqldb - Microsoft SQL server driver for Go (golang)

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1430127



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-denisenkom-go-mssqldb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1495515] Review Request: ghc-wai-app-static - WAI application for static serving

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1495515

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||peter...@redhat.com



--- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
ghc-hakyll will need to be rebuilt against this package when I get around to
building it (which won't be for a while until after the git-annex builds).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1471561] Review Request: python-oletools - Tools to analyze Microsoft OLE2 files

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1471561

Robert Scheck  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d
   ||e



--- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck  ---
Michal, ping? Are you still interested in python-oletools?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1411984] neofetch - a CLI system information tool written in Bash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Neofetch - a CLI system |neofetch - a CLI system
   |information tool written in |information tool written in
   |Bash|Bash



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1411984] Neofetch - a CLI system information tool written in Bash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984

Rex Dieter  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Version|25  |rawhide



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1411984] Neofetch - a CLI system information tool written in Bash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984



--- Comment #25 from Rex Dieter  ---
The package has not yet passed review, comment #22 includes:

"- As per
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Configuration_files,
you must mark any configuration files with %config or %config(noreplace). I see
that there's an /etc/neofetch/config installed by the package; this should
be marked as configuration. (Probably %config(noreplace))."

Fix that first, and the reviewer will likely approve it then

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1411984] Neofetch - a CLI system information tool written in Bash

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1411984



--- Comment #24 from Kees de Jong  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #23)
> @ Kees de Jong
> 
> I'd like this package to move forward, are you still interested in packaging
> it?

Hi Robert-Andre,


I still am, I got sponsored and the package is approved. But for some reason I
can't get access to my git repo, which is needed to commit the spec and push
the build.

$ fedrepo-req neofetch -t 1411984
Error: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over 60 days ago

^ The above was after 2 weeks the pagure ticket was approved. So I then
thought, let's just continue to the next step.


$ kinit keesdej...@fedoraproject.org  
Password for keesdej...@fedoraproject.org:  
$ fedpkg clone neofetch 
Cloning into 'neofetch'...  
FATAL: R any rpms/neofetch keesdejong DENIED by fallthru
(or you mis-spelled the reponame)   
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.   

Please make sure you have the correct access rights 
and the repository exists.  
Could not execute clone: Command '['git', 'clone',
'ssh://keesdej...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/rpms/neofetch', '--origin', 'origin']'
returned non-zero exit status 128


I asked a few times on IRC on what to do, but no one replied. So it slowly went
down my priorities. I'll contact my sponsor this weekend to find out what I'm
missing. Or maybe you know more about this? In any case, expect an update in
about a week.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 794793] Review Request: openssl-ibmpkcs11 - An openssl PKCS#11 engine

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=794793

Hanns-Joachim Uhl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1498619



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1431422] Review Request: python-agate-sql - Adds SQL read/ write support to agate

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431422

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package accepted.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 18 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/python-agate-sql/review-python-agate-
 sql/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
 -agate-sql , python3-agate-sql , python-agate-sql-doc
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include 

[Bug 1431423] Review Request: python-agate-excel - Adds read support for Excel files to agate

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1431423

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package accepted.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 32 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/python-agate-excel/review-python-agate-
 excel/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 6 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
 that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in python2
 -agate-excel , python3-agate-excel , python-agate-excel-doc
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from 

[Bug 1115680] Review Request: nodejs-jscs - JavaScript Code Style

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1115680

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1498609




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1498609
[Bug 1498609] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for
the CLI
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1191212] Review Request: nodejs-cli-table - Pretty unicode tables for the CLI

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1191212

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|WONTFIX |DUPLICATE



--- Comment #14 from Jared Smith  ---


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1498609 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org