[Bug 1533777] New: Review Request: rust-crypto-hash - Wrapper for OS-level cryptographic hash functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533777 Bug ID: 1533777 Summary: Review Request: rust-crypto-hash - Wrapper for OS-level cryptographic hash functions Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-crypto-hash.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-crypto-hash-0.3.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Wrapper for OS-level cryptographic hash functions. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1529516] Un-retirement Review Request: mint-y-theme - The Mint-Y theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529516 Theo Morra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||td...@td512.io --- Comment #12 from Theo Morra --- mint-y-theme-1.2.3-1.el7 doesn't appear to be in EPEL 7 at this time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1529516] Un-retirement Review Request: mint-y-theme - The Mint-Y theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529516 Todd Zullinger changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |MODIFIED CC||t...@pobox.com Resolution|ERRATA |--- Keywords||Reopened --- Comment #13 from Todd Zullinger --- Perhaps this is relevant: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=23552 The package doesn't seem to be included in the epel7 tag. I'm re-opening this ticket so the maintainers can poke whomever is needed. I suspect that's someone from releng or infrastructure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1344115] Review Request: winetricks - Work around common problems in Wine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1344115 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.redhat.com ||/show_bug.cgi?id=1533795 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533801] New: Review Request: ghc-call-stack - GHC call-stacks backward compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533801 Bug ID: 1533801 Summary: Review Request: ghc-call-stack - GHC call-stacks backward compatibility Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: peter...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-call-stack.spec SRPM URL: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org//ghc-call-stack-0.1.0-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Use GHC call-stacks in a backward compatible way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533801] Review Request: ghc-call-stack - GHC call-stacks backward compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533801 --- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24150850 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 706199] Review Request: gnupg-pkcs11-scd - GnuPG-compatible smart-card daemon with PKCS#11 support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=706199 Jakub Jelen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jje...@redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelen --- Hello, can you do also a Fedora 27 build & update before Fedora 28 will be release? I would like to give it a try. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1526056] Review Request: rubygem-ascii_binder - An AsciiDoc-based system for authoring and publishing documentation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1526056 --- Comment #5 from Vít Ondruch --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #4) > BuildRequires: rubygem(trollop) >= 0.1.2 > > Should be 2.1.2 Heh, good one. Probably better to drop the version entirely. > What's preventing you from packaging the missing deps? Mainly doubts that they are really required and for what purpose. And even if they are good for something, probably better to get ascii_binder to Fedora sooner than later even if some parts should not be 100% percent working. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533801] Review Request: ghc-call-stack - GHC call-stacks backward compatibility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533801 Jens Petersen changed: What|Removed |Added CC||haskell-devel@lists.fedorap ||roject.org --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen --- Needed by various newly added libraries - currently a subpackage of ghc-HUnit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--- Comment #12 from Alec Leamas ---
Hi!
Things begin to take shape... with issues below fix I'm ready to approve
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
for the package is included in %license.
Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
- License: contains a typo (and and)
- According to GL referenced in comment #9, bundled code must be removed
in %prep. However, the awesome font files are removed in %install
instead.
- The iostream header files mentioned in comment #10 are bundled, and
thus needs a Provides(...).
- The devel package has no R: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
(GL reference in comment #9)
- The scripts /usr/bin/plot.awk and /usr/bin/ps2pswLinks.gawk are
executable but has no shebang. Looking at them, it seems that they are
no scripts, should be 444 and thus live somewhere else (/usr/share?)
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Apache (v2.0)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) GPL (v3 or later)", "SIL
(v1.1)", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright*
LGPL (v3)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) BSD (3 clause)",
"*No copyright* CC0 (v5)", "BSL (v1.0) BSD (3 clause)", "zlib/libpng",
"BSD (unspecified)", "LGPL (v3 or later)", "GPL (v3)", "*No copyright*
CC0", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)", "BSD (3 clause)", "BSD (2
clause)", "MIT/X11 (BSD like) Apache (v2.0)", "*No copyright* BSD (3
clause)", "LGPL (v3)". 3263 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/mk/tmp/FedoraReview/1531955-seqan2/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[!]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 61440 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec U
[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364 --- Comment #20 from Florian Weimer --- What is the status here? Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--- Comment #13 from Antonio Trande ---
(In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #12)
> Hi!
>
> Things begin to take shape... with issues below fix I'm ready to approve
>
>
> Package Review
> ==
>
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
>
>
> Issues:
> ===
> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
> for the package is included in %license.
> Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
> See:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
It is as GPLv3+, BSD and LGPLv3+
> - The devel package has no R: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> (GL reference in comment #9)
Devel sub-package does not need 'seqan'. They're independant.
> - The scripts /usr/bin/plot.awk and /usr/bin/ps2pswLinks.gawk are
> executable but has no shebang. Looking at them, it seems that they are
> no scripts, should be 444 and thus live somewhere else (/usr/share?)
>
Here i don't know how manage these files. Let me check.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1529516] Un-retirement Review Request: mint-y-theme - The Mint-Y theme
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529516 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #14 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- (In reply to Theo Morra from comment #12) > mint-y-theme-1.2.3-1.el7 doesn't appear to be in EPEL 7 at this time. (In reply to Todd Zullinger from comment #13) > The package doesn't seem to be included in the epel7 tag. I'm re-opening > this ticket so the maintainers can poke whomever is needed. I suspect > that's someone from releng or infrastructure. Thank you for giving me this short heads up! I've reported the problem to the Releng issue-tracker [1]. [1] https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7226#comment-488430 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533719] Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719 Iwicki Artur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fed...@svgames.pl --- Comment #1 from Iwicki Artur --- ># fix HTML docs line endings >for file in html/*.html ; do > tr -d '\r' <$file >$file.unix && mv $file.unix $file >done Wouldn't it be simpler to use dos2unix here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533719] Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719 --- Comment #2 from Zamir SUN --- Oh, I try to keep it mostly as-is from rpmfusion. I can post an update if this is essential for a review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364 Steve Dickson changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat. ||com) --- Comment #21 from Steve Dickson --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #20) > What is the status here? Thanks. IDK... what is the next step? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--- Comment #14 from Alec Leamas ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13)
> (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #12)
> > Hi!
> > ===
> > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
> > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
> > for the package is included in %license.
> > Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license
> > See:
> > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
>
> It is as GPLv3+, BSD and LGPLv3+
Yes, no doubt. But the GL doesn't really seem to care - they just require that
these files should be included, full stop. You'll need include all of them. I
agree this is a mess, but GL being what they are I see no alternative. Debian
has a better system here, and IIRC there has been Fedora discussions on
hardlinking these files. But I'm not aware of any conclusion.
> > - The devel package has no R: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release}
> > (GL reference in comment #9)
>
> Devel sub-package does not need 'seqan'. They're independant.
OK, this is nothing like usual. Are you sure -devel is the proper name? That
said, this is C++ and you can do a lot in headers. If you are sure you can do
useful things with -devel without the base package, then you're certainly
right.
That said, it looks weird.
> > - The scripts /usr/bin/plot.awk and /usr/bin/ps2pswLinks.gawk are
> > executable but has no shebang. Looking at them, it seems that they are
> > no scripts, should be 444 and thus live somewhere else (/usr/share?)
> >
>
> Here i don't know how manage these files. Let me check.
I would just have made them 444 and moved them to /usr/share/seqan2 in
%install, checking references and add a note to README.fedora
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1491281] Review Request: python-libsass - python bindings for libsass
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1491281 --- Comment #17 from Marcel Plch --- A mistake. However, there is a new commit with a new spec with this also corrected. Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/master/python-libsass.spec SRPM URL: https://github.com/Traceur759/python-libsass/raw/master/python-libsass-0.13.4-1.fc27.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533472] Review Rename Request: webkit2gtk3 - GTK+ Web content engine library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533472 Tomas Popela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||webkit2gtk3-2.19.5-2.fc28 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-01-12 09:41:28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533929] New: Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929 Bug ID: 1533929 Summary: Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: besse...@fedoraproject.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Description: libkcapi allows user-space to access the Linux kernel crypto API. This library uses the netlink interface and exports easy to use APIs so that a developer does not need to consider the low-level netlink interface handling. The library does not implement any cipher algorithms. All consumer requests are sent to the kernel for processing. Results from the kernel crypto API are returned to the consumer via the library API. The kernel interface and therefore this library can be used by unprivileged processes. Issues: fedora-review shows no obvious issues. FAS-User: besser82 Urls: TBA Additional information: I'm taking over this review as suggested by the original reporter. See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396819#c12 (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #12) > Hmm, I wanted to package libkcapi as a dependency for another project, but > the direction shifted. I won't have time for this in the near future, so if > somebody wants to take over, feel free. Thanks for review in advance! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1396819] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396819 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED CC||besse...@fedoraproject.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Last Closed||2018-01-12 09:56:36 --- Comment #13 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- (In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #12) > Hmm, I wanted to package libkcapi as a dependency for another project, but > the direction shifted. I won't have time for this in the near future, so if > somebody wants to take over, feel free. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1533929 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533929] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zbys...@in.waw.pl --- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- *** Bug 1396819 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1529012] Review Request: js-jsroot - JavaScript ROOT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1529012 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- js-jquery-mousewheel-3.1.13-1.el7, js-jsroot-5.3.4-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-377ad5b245 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- iucode-tool-2.2-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-612f127735 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1514119] Package review: python-rsdclient - OpenStack client plugin for Rack Scale Design
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1514119 Alfredo Moralejo changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-01-12 10:25:10 --- Comment #18 from Alfredo Moralejo --- Packages is pushed to rawhide repo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc26, cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc26, lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc26, python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6fd0ee417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-klusta-3.0.16-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f6f388fbb1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Path-Iter-0.2-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-40494a72f3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533490] Review Request: iucode-tool - iucode_tool is a program to manipulate microcode update collections for Intel i686 and X86-64 system processors , and prepare them for use by the Linux k
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533490 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- iucode-tool-2.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f238807354 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc27, cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc27, lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc27, python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3c9fddee81 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532082] Review Request: python-klusta - Spike detection and automatic clustering for spike sorting
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532082 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-klusta-3.0.16-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6ccd915b6a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531380] Review Request: perl-Path-Iter - Simple Efficient Path Iteration
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531380 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Path-Iter-0.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-84434dcb8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364 Charalampos Stratakis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cstra...@redhat.com --- Comment #22 from Charalampos Stratakis --- The headers were removed from glibc but the package that provides the headers now is still in review. python2 and python3 use those header to build the nis module and currently both FTBFS which blocks us on other more important fixes that should be commited soon. Could the review proceed here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532364] Review Request: rpcsvc-proto - RPC protocol definition
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532364 --- Comment #23 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Charalampos Stratakis from comment #22) > The headers were removed from glibc but the package that provides the > headers now is still in review. The headers are provided by libtirpc-devel. You should add a BuildRequires for it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501992] Review Request: opam - Source-based package manager for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501992 --- Comment #14 from Ben Rosser --- Unfortunately it's not quite that simple. First, ocaml-re would need to be built for earlier Fedora versions; it's currently only in master (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-re). Rich would need to do this; I don't have ACLs on the package. (dose3 would also need to be built for the earlier releases, once re is available). After that... I wasn't able to compile the latest opam release on F26, so I think I would need to build a slightly older version (beta3 or beta4). I think there's a similar situation on Fedora 27 but I'm not sure. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 Zamir SUN changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugzilla.rpmfusion. ||org/show_bug.cgi?id=4761 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533980] New: Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-template - Fork of Go's text/ template adding newline elision
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533980 Bug ID: 1533980 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-template - Fork of Go's text/template adding newline elision Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pg...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pgier.people.redhat.com/reviews/golang-github-alecthomas-template/golang-github-alecthomas-template.spec SRPM URL: https://pgier.people.redhat.com/reviews/golang-github-alecthomas-template/golang-github-alecthomas-template-0-1.gita0175ee.fc27.src.rpm Description: Fork of Go's text/template adding newline elision Fedora Account System Username: pgier Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24158009 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533980] Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-template - Fork of Go's text/ template adding newline elision
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533980 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1512702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 [Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1533980 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533980 [Bug 1533980] Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-template - Fork of Go's text/template adding newline elision -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501992] Review Request: opam - Source-based package manager for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501992 --- Comment #15 from Richard W.M. Jones --- (In reply to Ben Rosser from comment #14) > Unfortunately it's not quite that simple. First, ocaml-re would need to be > built for earlier Fedora versions; it's currently only in master > (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ocaml-re). Rich would need to do this; I > don't have ACLs on the package. (dose3 would also need to be built for the > earlier releases, once re is available). > > After that... I wasn't able to compile the latest opam release on F26, so I > think I would need to build a slightly older version (beta3 or beta4). I > think there's a similar situation on Fedora 27 but I'm not sure. Is it just ocaml-re or other packages? I'll send a request for branches for ocaml-re only for now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501992] Review Request: opam - Source-based package manager for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501992 --- Comment #16 from Richard W.M. Jones --- I see you mentioned ocaml-dose3 too. I have requested f26 & f27 branches for both packages, but AFAIK it may take some time for those requests to be processed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533929] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929 --- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Scratch builds: Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24159255 fc27: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24159256 Urls: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/libkcapi.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/libkcapi-1.0.2-0.1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #53 from Yaakov Selkowitz --- (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #51) > Well, even if I reject this, you could always find another reviewer, so > let's have FESCo decide: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1808 . > Packaging-wise, this package is fine and I'll approve it if FESCo says go > ahead. FESCo approved this today. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532794] Review Request: libxcrypt - Extended crypt library for DES, MD5, Blowfish and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532794 --- Comment #10 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- The spec file has been imported to dist-git [1]. It will be build after FESCo decided positively about the propsed change and the needed changes to glibc are ready. The files behind the previous links to the spec file and srpm have been removed. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libxcrypt -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532794] Review Request: libxcrypt - Extended crypt library for DES, MD5, Blowfish and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532794 Björn "besser82" Esser changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|RELEASE_PENDING -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532023] Review Request: ddupdate - A Dynamic DNS Updater
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532023
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
- This package is not correctly named, see common SPEC file
for Python packages:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Python#Example_common_spec_file
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming?rd=Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Python_source_package_naming
Source rpm must be 'python-ddupdate'; its sub-package is
>>>
%package -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{srcname}
Summary:%{sum}
%{?python_provide:%python_provide python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{srcname}}
%description -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{srcname}
An python module which provides a convenient example.
...
%files -n python%{python3_pkgversion}-%{srcname}
%license COPYING
%doc README.rst
%{python3_sitelib}/*
...
<<<
- Do not use hard-coded directory names:
rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/share/doc/ddupdate/*
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 38 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/sagitter/1532023-ddupdate/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[!]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments)
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1331187 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1331187 [Bug 1331187] seqan badly needs an update -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955 --- Comment #15 from Antonio Trande --- (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #14) > (In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #13) > > (In reply to Alec Leamas from comment #12) > > > Hi! > > > > === > > > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > > > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > > > for the package is included in %license. > > > Note: License file LICENSE is not marked as %license > > > See: > > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text > > > > It is as GPLv3+, BSD and LGPLv3+ > > Yes, no doubt. But the GL doesn't really seem to care - they just require > that these files should be included, full stop. You'll need include all of > them. I agree this is a mess, but GL being what they are I see no > alternative. Debian has a better system here, and IIRC there has been Fedora > discussions on hardlinking these files. But I'm not aware of any conclusion. All LICENSE files are already included: ## Renamed each single license file cp -p apps/rep_sep/LICENSE LGPLv3+.txt cp -p apps/rabema/LICENSE GPLv3+.txt cp -p LICENSE BSD.txt They're different licenses with same file name, here why i chose to rename them. There is not problem in my opinion. > > > > - The scripts /usr/bin/plot.awk and /usr/bin/ps2pswLinks.gawk are > > > executable but has no shebang. Looking at them, it seems that they are > > > no scripts, should be 444 and thus live somewhere else (/usr/share?) > > > > > > > Here i don't know how manage these files. Let me check. > > I would just have made them 444 and moved them to /usr/share/seqan2 in > %install, checking references and add a note to README.fedora 'plot.awk' and 'ps2pswLinks.gawk' are used as input files by other seqan scripts; see 'roi_plot_9.sh' script. To be used, 'roi_plot_9.sh' needs them inside /usr/bin. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal) --- Comment #54 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- Blocking FE-Legal, as it describes more was the current situation is. Personally I would prefer this package to be free and in fedora, even partially. But it's clearly not the case. Not only, this package is GPL incompatible and I'm not going to re-state the detail on purpose here. So far, Fesco only approved this build "if" it's free. Fesco did not describe a method to make both ends works as appropriate WRT the packaging side, so the situation is still moot. The current proposal is in-appropriate. It only describes one end of the task and leave the other part of the work to someone else that yet isn't nominated. Worst, it will make the package to supersede the current version we package without bringing more value to fedora+rpmfusion users. Not replacing any "base distro" package is one core value of our project, so we cannot accept a situation where, even if nothing as changed in our side, we would be turned into a situation where we would not follow this non-replacement guideline anymore. The other issue is "how the packaging would be done", as this package is a fork of the original fdk-aac project. Because of the fork, both projects can live a different way and because we want to have full hands on the way we update the fdk-aac package based on the original project, we don't want to be in a situation where we would wait for a downstream fork for update in order to have a "coherent situation" WRT complementary packages and ABI, etc. As a coordinator of a third party project, I retain the rights not to provide, not to replace and not to complement any fdk-aac component that would be introduced in fedora by a packager without any coordination with our project. With that said, I would like to explicitly leave a room for anyone mandated to "do the complementary job" to use the rpmfusion packagers infra for such purpose. (provided that few restrictions are left on the infra side). This hold for the general kind of such issue and in a more general manner I would like to think on a written guideline to prevent such "half backed idea" to hit the fedora repos in the future. That, in order to strength the unwritten guideline of not re-using the package namespace if a fedora package is an incomplete version of a package that is already found on our well known repository. While at it, I still have an alternatives method in mind that would prevent this fdk-aac package to hit our "non-replacement policy". It would be to have a "side repo" similar to the openh264 case (or even to share the same repo). That way, it would be possible to enable such repository on user request, if our repository isn't enabled. As the consequence, none would have to deal with bugs introduced by the other party and to deal with the complementary mess. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=182235 [Bug 182235] Fedora Legal Tracker -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533929] Review Request: libkcapi - User space interface to the Linux Kernel Crypto API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533929 --- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser --- Updated package: - New upstream release Scratch builds: Rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24160769 fc27: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24160777 Urls: Spec URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/libkcapi.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/libkcapi-1.0.3-0.1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534041] New: Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-units - Helpful unit multipliers and functions for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534041 Bug ID: 1534041 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-units - Helpful unit multipliers and functions for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pg...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-alecthomas-units/golang-github-alecthomas-units.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-alecthomas-units/golang-github-alecthomas-units-0-1.git2efee85.fc27.src.rpm Description: Helpful unit multipliers and functions for Go Fedora Account System Username: pgier Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24160737 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1534041 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534041 [Bug 1534041] Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-units - Helpful unit multipliers and functions for Go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534041] Review Request: golang-github-alecthomas-units - Helpful unit multipliers and functions for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534041 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1512702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 [Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] New: Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 Bug ID: 1534044 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pg...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-beevik-ntp/golang-github-beevik-ntp.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-beevik-ntp/golang-github-beevik-ntp-0.2.0-1.git62c80a0.fc27.src.rpm Description: A simple ntp client written in go Fedora Account System Username: pgier Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24160875 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1534044 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 [Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1512702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 [Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534050] New: Review Request: python-nixio - Python bindings for NIX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534050 Bug ID: 1534050 Summary: Review Request: python-nixio - Python bindings for NIX Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-nixio/python-nixio.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-nixio/python-nixio-1.4.2-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: The NIX project started as an initiative within the Electrophysiology Task Force a part of the INCF Data sharing Program. The NIX data model allows to store fully annotated scientific dataset, i.e. the data together with its metadata within the same container. Our aim is to achieve standardization by providing a common/generic data structure for a multitude of data types. See the wiki for more information The current implementations store the actual data using the HDF5 file format as a storage backend. Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #55 from Michael Catanzaro --- FE-Legal has already approved this package. Do you have a specific question for them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534052] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-netlink - Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534052 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1512702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 [Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Paul Gier changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1534052 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534052 [Bug 1534052] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-netlink - Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534052] New: Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-netlink - Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534052 Bug ID: 1534052 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-netlink - Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: pg...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink.spec SRPM URL: https://people.redhat.com/pgier/reviews/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink/golang-github-mdlayher-netlink-0-1.git82077d5.fc27.src.rpm Description: Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets Fedora Account System Username: pgier Koji: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=24161025 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534054] New: Review Request: rust-mio - Lightweight non-blocking IO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534054 Bug ID: 1534054 Summary: Review Request: rust-mio - Lightweight non-blocking IO Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-mio.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-mio-0.6.12-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Lightweight non-blocking IO. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534056] Review Request: rust-tokio-core - Core I/ O and event loop primitives for asynchronous I/O in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534056 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1534054 (rust-mio) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534054 [Bug 1534054] Review Request: rust-mio - Lightweight non-blocking IO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534056] New: Review Request: rust-tokio-core - Core I/ O and event loop primitives for asynchronous I/O in Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534056 Bug ID: 1534056 Summary: Review Request: rust-tokio-core - Core I/O and event loop primitives for asynchronous I/O in Rust Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ignate...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-tokio-core.spec SRPM URL: https://ignatenkobrain.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-tokio-core-0.1.12-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Core I/O and event loop primitives for asynchronous I/O in Rust. Fedora Account System Username: ignatenkobrain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534054] Review Request: rust-mio - Lightweight non-blocking IO
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534054 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1534056 (rust-tokio-core) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534056 [Bug 1534056] Review Request: rust-tokio-core - Core I/O and event loop primitives for asynchronous I/O in Rust -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534067] New: Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534067 Bug ID: 1534067 Summary: Review Request: python-pybids - Interface with datasets conforming to BIDS Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: sanjay.an...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pybids/python-pybids.spec SRPM URL: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/python-pybids/python-pybids-0.4.2-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: PyBIDS is a Python module to interface with datasets conforming BIDS. Fedora Account System Username: ankursinha -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533719] Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ser...@serjux.com --- Comment #3 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- Packages remaining to rebuild: fawkes kf5-libkface player but player is FTBFS bug #1533278 , fawkes depends on player and kf5-libkface bug #1423813 was retired and add to Fedora fedora-obsolete-packages -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1531955] Review Request: seqan2 - C++ library of efficient algorithms and data structures
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531955
--- Comment #16 from Alec Leamas ---
(In reply to Antonio Trande from comment #15)
>
> All LICENSE files are already included:
>
> ## Renamed each single license file
> cp -p apps/rep_sep/LICENSE LGPLv3+.txt
> cp -p apps/rabema/LICENSE GPLv3+.txt
> cp -p LICENSE BSD.txt
Not really. I see:
$ cd BUILD
$ find . -name LICENSE\* | wc -l
39
So, here is at least 39 license files. Looking at size, many are unique:
ls -l $(find . -iname LICENSE\* ) | awk '{print $5}' | sort | uniq | wc -l
30
> They're different licenses with same file name, here why i chose to rename
> them. There is not problem in my opinion.
GL at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines says:
"If the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file,
then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package must be
included in %license."
I see no exceptions here. All of them should go into %license, >= 40 files.
> 'plot.awk' and 'ps2pswLinks.gawk' are used as input files by other seqan
> scripts; see 'roi_plot_9.sh' script.
>
> To be used, 'roi_plot_9.sh' needs them inside /usr/bin.
That still doesn't make them to binaries, for sure. They should be 444, and
such files does not belong in /usr/bin. I think I'd move them to
/usr/share/seqan2 and either patch the scripts using them or add a symlink to
/usr/bin (a symlink is OK).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533719] Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719 --- Comment #4 from Zamir SUN --- (In reply to Sergio Monteiro Basto from comment #3) > Packages remaining to rebuild: > fawkes > kf5-libkface > player > > but player is FTBFS bug #1533278 , fawkes depends on player and kf5-libkface > bug #1423813 was retired and add to Fedora fedora-obsolete-packages Hi Sergio, This is the review request of twolame. I believe you are commenting about kde related packages which is not about twolame. Let's keep this bug focused. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1533719] Review Request: twolame - Optimized MPEG Audio Layer 2 encoding library based on tooLAME
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1533719 --- Comment #5 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- sorry wrote in wrong bug is was for bug 1530090 ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc26 cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-2.fc26 lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc26 python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c6fd0ee417 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- CuraEngine-lulzbot-2.6.63-1.fc27 cura-lulzbot-2.6.63-2.fc27 lulzbot-marlin-firmware-1.1.5.64-1.fc27 python-uranium-lulzbot-2.6.63-3.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3c9fddee81 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532837] Review Request: python-uranium-lulzbot - A Python framework for building desktop applications
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532837 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532990] Review Request: ghc-cheapskate - Experimental markdown processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532990 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-cheapskate-0.1.1-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2be9f5e413 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532990] Review Request: ghc-cheapskate - Experimental markdown processor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532990 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532993] Review Request: ghc-annotated-wl-pprint - The Wadler/ Leijen Pretty Printer, with annotation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532993 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- ghc-annotated-wl-pprint-0.7.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c7e4c3c9bd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1532993] Review Request: ghc-annotated-wl-pprint - The Wadler/ Leijen Pretty Printer, with annotation support
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532993 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
