[Bug 1563925] Review Request: ghc-cabal-helper - Simple interface to some of Cabal' s configuration state, mainly used by ghc-mod

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563925



--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26173883

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563925] New: Review Request: ghc-cabal-helper - Simple interface to some of Cabal' s configuration state, mainly used by ghc-mod

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563925

Bug ID: 1563925
   Summary: Review Request: ghc-cabal-helper - Simple interface to
some of Cabal's configuration state, mainly used by
ghc-mod
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org




Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cabal-helper.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//ghc-cabal-helper-0.8.0.2-1.fc27.src.rpm

Description:
Cabal's little helper provides access to build information gathered by 'cabal'
when configuring a project. Specifically we're interested in retrieving enough
information to bring up a compiler session, using the GHC API, which is similar
to running 'cabal repl' in a project.

While simple in principle this is complicated by the fact that the information
Cabal writes to disk is in an unstable format and only really accessible
through the Cabal API itself.

Since we do not want to bind the user of a development tool which utilises this
library to a specific version of Cabal we compile the code which interfaces
with the Cabal library's API on the user's machine, at runtime, against
whichever version of Cabal was used to write the on disk information for a
given project.

If this version of Cabal is not available on the users machine anymore, which
is fairly likely since cabal-install is usually linked statically, we have
support for compiling the Cabal library also. In this case the library is
installed into a private, isolated, package database in
'$XDG_CACHE_HOME/cabal-helper' so as to not interfere with the user's package
database.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711



--- Comment #20 from Fedora Update System  ---
libemu-0.2.0-8.20130410gitab48695.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora
EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-6e774e5bc6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
libemu-0.2.0-8.20130410gitab48695.fc28 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-42ed2dfa4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
libemu-0.2.0-8.20130410gitab48695.fc26 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ad1355662c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
libemu-0.2.0-8.20130410gitab48695.fc27 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-27aaee2a9c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711

Michal Ambroz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Alias|libemu  |



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964



--- Comment #6 from Matthieu Saulnier  ---
thanks a lot for the review

I requested for the new SCM repo here:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5604

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1543578] Review Request: php-deepdiver-zipstreamer - package maintained fork of PHPZipStreamer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543578

Christian Glombek  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|needinfo?(c@petersen-glombe |
   |k.de)   |



--- Comment #15 from Christian Glombek  ---
I'll do it this w/e! Sorry for lagging behind on this.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1543578] Review Request: php-deepdiver-zipstreamer - package maintained fork of PHPZipStreamer

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543578

James Hogarth  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||james.hoga...@gmail.com
  Flags||needinfo?(c@petersen-glombe
   ||k.de)



--- Comment #14 from James Hogarth  ---
Chris this is needed for the owncloud 10.0.7 update too - can you please ping
me when you have the repos up?

We'll need F27 as well as F28 and rawhide.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563810] Review Request: vim-toml - Vim syntax for TOML

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563810

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Add the snapshot date for dev snapshot:

Release:0.1.20180404git%{shortcommit}%{?dist}

* Wed Apr 04 2018 Carl George  - 0-0.1.20180404git624f024

Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 4 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/vim-toml/review-vim-toml/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
 architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
 files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
 $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside 

[Bug 1563830] Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for asyncio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
 Blocks|1551479 |
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 10 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/python-aiodns/review-python-
 aiodns/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in
 python2-aiodns , python3-aiodns
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
 translations 

[Bug 1563830] Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for asyncio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1551479




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551479
[Bug 1551479] update 0.11
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563854] New: Review Request: nodejs-tempfile - Get a random temporary file path

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563854

Bug ID: 1563854
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-tempfile - Get a random
temporary file path
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-tempfile/nodejs-tempfile.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-tempfile/nodejs-tempfile-2.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: Get a random temporary file path
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "NTP", "ISC", "Unknown or generated",
 "BSD (3 clause)". 52 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-pycares/review-
 python-pycares/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 4 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
 process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
 provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: 

[Bug 1563836] Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint - A conventional-changelog eslint preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563836

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Latest version packaged
 - License ok
 - Builds in Mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to the Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964



--- Comment #4 from Matthieu Saulnier  ---
hi! thanks for your work. It seems we are working in the same time on it :)

this is the changelog, including your advises:

- Remove useless code duplication step
- Add missing %%python_provide macro in subpackages
- Cleanup rst doc script in %%install section
- Fix file ownership in doc subpackage

Spec URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-pycares.spec
SRPM URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-pycares-2.3.0-2.fc27.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563849] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint - A conventional-changelog jshint preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563849

Bug ID: 1563849
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint -
A conventional-changelog jshint preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jshint-0.3.8-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: A conventional-changelog jshint preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563816] Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember - A conventional-changelog ember preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563816

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
 CC||zebo...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Latest version packaged
 - License ok
 - Builds in Mock
 - No rpmlint errors
 - Conforms to the Packaging Guidelines

Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563847] New: Review Request: nodejs-add-stream - Append the contents of one stream onto another

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563847

Bug ID: 1563847
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-add-stream - Append the
contents of one stream onto another
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-add-stream/nodejs-add-stream.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-add-stream/nodejs-add-stream-1.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: Append the contents of one stream onto another
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563844] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs - conventional-changelog jscs preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563844

Bug ID: 1563844
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs -
conventional-changelog jscs preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jscs-0.1.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: conventional-changelog jscs preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563437] Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-codemirror - A conventional-changelog CodeMirror preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563437



--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-conventional-changelog-codemirror

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563353] Review Request: python-click-completion - Add automatic completion support for fish, Zsh, Bash and PowerShell to Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563353



--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-click-completion

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563843] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery - A conventional-changelog jquery preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563843

Bug ID: 1563843
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery -
A conventional-changelog jquery preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery/nodejs-conventional-changelog-jquery-1.3.8-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: A conventional-changelog jquery preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Actually for got to add the python provides:


%{?python_provide:%python_provide python2-%{srcname}}

%{?python_provide:%python_provide python3-%{srcname}}

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563668] Review Request: lxcfs - FUSE based filesystem for LXC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563668



--- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lxcfs

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964



--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Proposed SPEC:

# set upstream name variable
%global srcname pycares


%if 0%{?fedora}
%bcond_without python3
%else
%bcond_with python3
%endif

Name:   python-pycares
Version:2.3.0
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:Python interface for c-ares

License:MIT
URL:https://github.com/saghul/pycares
Source0:   
https://github.com/saghul/%{srcname}/archive/%{srcname}-%{version}.tar.gz

BuildRequires:  python2-devel
# for docs
BuildRequires:  python2-sphinx
%if %{with python3}
BuildRequires:  python3-devel
%endif # with python3

%description
pycares is a Python module which provides an interface to
c-ares. c-ares is a C library that performs DNS requests and name
resolutions asynchronously.


%package -n python2-%{srcname}
Summary:Python interface for c-ares

%description -n python2-%{srcname}
pycares is a Python module which provides an interface to
c-ares. c-ares is a C library that performs DNS requests and name
resolutions asynchronously.


%if %{with python3}
%package -n python3-%{srcname}
Summary:Python interface for c-ares

%description -n python3-%{srcname}
pycares is a Python module which provides an interface to
c-ares. c-ares is a C library that performs DNS requests and name
resolutions asynchronously.
%endif # with python3


%package -n python-%{srcname}-doc
Summary:Documentation for python-pycares
BuildArch:  noarch
Requires:   python2-%{srcname}

%description -n python-%{srcname}-doc
pycares is a Python module which provides an interface to
c-ares. c-ares is a C library that performs DNS requests and name
resolutions asynchronously.

This package contains documentation in reST and HTML formats.


%prep
%autosetup -n %{srcname}-%{srcname}-%{version}


%build
%py2_build

%if %{with python3}
%py3_build
%endif # with python3

# Build sphinx documentation
pushd docs/
make html
popd # docs


%install
# Must do the python3 install first because the scripts in /usr/bin are
# overwritten with every setup.py install (and we want the python2 version
# to be the default for now).
%if %{with python3}
%py3_install
%endif # with python3

%py2_install

# Install html docs
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/
cp -pr docs/_build/html %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/

# Move sources
mkdir -p %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/rst/
mv -f %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/html/_sources/* %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/rst/
rmdir %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/html/_sources/

# Remove buildinfo sphinx documentation
rm -rf %{buildroot}%{_pkgdocdir}/html/.buildinfo

# Fix non-standard modes (775)
chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python2_sitearch}/%{srcname}/_core.so
chmod 755 %{buildroot}%{python3_sitearch}/%{srcname}/_core.cpython-*.so


%check
%{__python2} setup.py test -s pycares._core
%if %{with python3}
%{__python3} setup.py test -s pycares._core
%endif


%files -n python2-%{srcname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst ChangeLog
# For arch-specific packages: sitearch
%{python2_sitearch}/%{srcname}/
%{python2_sitearch}/%{srcname}-%{version}-*.egg-info/


%if %{with python3}
%files -n python3-%{srcname}
%license LICENSE
%doc README.rst ChangeLog
# For arch-specific packages: sitearch
%{python3_sitearch}/%{srcname}/
%{python3_sitearch}/%{srcname}-%{version}-*.egg-info/
%endif # with python3


%files -n python-%{srcname}-doc
%doc examples
%{_pkgdocdir}/html/
%{_pkgdocdir}/rst/


%changelog
* Mon Apr  2 2018 Matthieu Saulnier  - 2.3.0-1
- Initial package

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563611] Review Request: perl-Path-Tiny-Rule - Path::Iterator:: Rule subclass that returns Path::Tiny objects

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563611



--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Path-Tiny-Rule

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563204] Review Request: rust-tokio-timer - Timer facilities for Tokio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563204



--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tokio-timer

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563189] Review Request: obs-service-set_version - OBS source service : Update spec file version

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563189

cl...@redhat.com changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags||fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563831] Review Request: qspec - GUI testing library for Qt desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563831



--- Comment #1 from Raphael Groner  ---
Next try: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26172062

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563382] Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-atom - A conventional-changelog atom preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563382



--- Comment #4 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nodejs-conventional-changelog-atom

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563839] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-express - A conventional-changelog express preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563839

Bug ID: 1563839
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-express
- A conventional-changelog express preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-express/nodejs-conventional-changelog-express.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-express/nodejs-conventional-changelog-express-0.3.6-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: A conventional-changelog express preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563836] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint - A conventional-changelog eslint preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563836

Bug ID: 1563836
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint -
A conventional-changelog eslint preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint/nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint/nodejs-conventional-changelog-eslint-1.0.9-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: A conventional-changelog eslint preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563830] Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for asyncio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830

Matthieu Saulnier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1551479




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551479
[Bug 1551479] update 0.11
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1392649] Review Request: tacacs+- Cisco AAA server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392649



--- Comment #9 from Raphael Groner  ---
Are you interested in a review swap? Maybe with bug #1563831.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563831] Review Request: qspec - GUI testing library for Qt desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563831

Raphael Groner  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928937
[Bug 928937] Qt-related package review tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563831] New: Review Request: qspec - GUI testing library for Qt desktop applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563831

Bug ID: 1563831
   Summary: Review Request: qspec - GUI testing library for Qt
desktop applications
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: projects...@smart.ms
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/qspec/qspec.spec
SRPM URL:
https://raphgro.fedorapeople.org/review/qt/qspec/qspec-0.2-1.20160909git.fc27.src.rpm
Description: GUI testing library for Qt desktop applications
Fedora Account System Username: raphgro

Test builds: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26172062

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563830] Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for asyncio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830

Matthieu Saulnier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1562964




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964
[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562964] Review Request: python-pycares - Python interface for c-ares

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562964

Matthieu Saulnier  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1563830




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830
[Bug 1563830] Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for
asyncio
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563830] New: Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver for asyncio

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563830

Bug ID: 1563830
   Summary: Review Request: python-aiodns - Simple DNS resolver
for asyncio
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: cas...@casperlefantom.net
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-aiodns.spec
SRPM URL: https://fantom.fedorapeople.org/python-aiodns-1.1.1-1.fc27.src.rpm
Description:
aiodns provides a simple way for doing asynchronous DNS resolutions
with a synchronous looking interface by using pycares.

Fedora Account System Username: fantom

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522



--- Comment #90 from Yaakov Selkowitz  ---
(In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #82)
> $ fedpkg --module-name fdk-aac request-repo 1501522
> Could not execute request_repo: The Bugzilla bug's review was approved over
> 60 days ago

I reset the flag for you.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522

Yaakov Selkowitz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522

Yaakov Selkowitz  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review+  |fedora-review?



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563816] New: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember - A conventional-changelog ember preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563816

Bug ID: 1563816
   Summary: Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember -
A conventional-changelog ember preset
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: jsmith.fed...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 956806 (nodejs-reviews)



Spec URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember/nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jsmith.fedorapeople.org/Packaging/nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember/nodejs-conventional-changelog-ember-0.3.11-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description: A conventional-changelog ember preset
Fedora Account System Username: jsmith


Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=956806
[Bug 956806] Node.js Review Tracker
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563437] Review Request: nodejs-conventional-changelog-codemirror - A conventional-changelog CodeMirror preset

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563437

Jared Smith  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



--- Comment #2 from Jared Smith  ---
Repo requested at https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/5603.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563810] New: Review Request: vim-toml - Vim syntax for TOML

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563810

Bug ID: 1563810
   Summary: Review Request: vim-toml - Vim syntax for TOML
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: carl@george.computer
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://carlwgeorge.fedorapeople.org/vim-toml.spec
SRPM URL:
https://carlwgeorge.fedorapeople.org/vim-toml-0-0.1.git624f024.fc29.src.rpm
Description: Vim syntax for TOML.
Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge
COPR: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/carlwgeorge/vim-toml/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1392649] Review Request: tacacs+- Cisco AAA server

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392649



--- Comment #8 from Itamar Reis Peixoto  ---
I am asking because the most interesting thing is to package it to el7+ and
Fedora, el6 end of life are in 2020.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2897c3fdfa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562452] Review Request: mypaint-brushes - Brushes to be used with the MyPaint library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
mypaint-brushes-1.3.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0973cc80e9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8e767badb9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559699] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699



--- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-8adce9baab

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562519] Review Request: git-crypt - transparent file encryption in git

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562519

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
git-crypt-0.6.0-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-74979395a9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562452] Review Request: mypaint-brushes - Brushes to be used with the MyPaint library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562452] Review Request: mypaint-brushes - Brushes to be used with the MyPaint library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
mypaint-brushes-1.3.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-710b265bd7

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562452] Review Request: mypaint-brushes - Brushes to be used with the MyPaint library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452



--- Comment #3 from Nils Philippsen  ---
Thanks for the review!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f01e61f142

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559699] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2343c53de1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559699] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdasm-1.6-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-0acbb92afb

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL
7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8657aca68a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1535207] Review Request: ravada - Remote Virtual Desktops Manager

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1535207

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
ravada-0.2.14-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8109ac4a9b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559699] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdasm-1.6-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-c9d5e8c275

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26
testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9bf4ff4e55

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1559699] Review Request: libdasm - Simple x86 disassembly library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559699

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
libdasm-1.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a0917c8330

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|CLOSED  |ON_QA
 Resolution|ERRATA  |---
   Keywords||Reopened



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-da3f24aa98

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563706] Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars - a game about hurling asteroids into the sun

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563706

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||zebo...@gmail.com



--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Why don't you use the %cmake macro instead of:

export CFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}"
export CXXFLAGS="${RPM_OPT_FLAGS}"

cd build
cmake .

 - You made a typo in the %changelog: 0.4.20180114git3f2aa58 →
0-4.20180114git3f2aa58

 - Use either spaces or tabs, not both:

gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars.src:15: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs
(spaces: line 15, tab: line 9)



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed



= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 47 files have
 unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/bob/packaging/review/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars/review-
 gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
 desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[x]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
 Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane 

[Bug 1562947] Review Request: python-neomodel - A Python OGM for Neo4j

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562947

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-04-04 13:10:11



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neomodel-3.2.5-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562245] Review Request: python-neo4j-driver - The official Python Neo4j driver

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562245

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-04-04 13:09:56



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neo4j-driver-1.5.3-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1532042] Review Request: compton - Compositor for X11

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1532042

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed|2018-03-31 00:41:38 |2018-04-04 13:09:58



--- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System  ---
compton-0.1-0.1.beta3.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557766] Review Request: libb2 - C library providing BLAKE2b, BLAKE2s , BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557766



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
libb2-0.98-1.20171225git60ea749.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553054] Review Request: R-bit - A class for vectors of 1-bit booleans

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553054



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-bit-1.1.12-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553053] Review Request: R-fastmatch - Fast match() function

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553053



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-fastmatch-1.1.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553082] Review Request: R-webutils - Utility Functions for Developing Web Applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553082



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-webutils-0.6-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1557766] Review Request: libb2 - C library providing BLAKE2b, BLAKE2s , BLAKE2bp, BLAKE2sp

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1557766



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
libb2-0.98-1.20171225git60ea749.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553053] Review Request: R-fastmatch - Fast match() function

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553053



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-fastmatch-1.1.0-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553054] Review Request: R-bit - A class for vectors of 1-bit booleans

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553054



--- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-bit-1.1.12-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1553082] Review Request: R-webutils - Utility Functions for Developing Web Applications

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553082



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
R-webutils-0.6-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563353] Review Request: python-click-completion - Add automatic completion support for fish, Zsh, Bash and PowerShell to Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563353

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |POST
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review+



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
Package approved.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563353] Review Request: python-click-completion - Add automatic completion support for fish, Zsh, Bash and PowerShell to Click

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563353



--- Comment #2 from Brett Lentz  ---
Removed shebangs. URLs in comment #1 updated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 879839] Review Request: libchipcard - enable DDV chipcards for HBIC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=879839



--- Comment #9 from Bill Nottingham  ---
*** Bug 1563738 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1562452] Review Request: mypaint-brushes - Brushes to be used with the MyPaint library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1562452



--- Comment #2 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mypaint-brushes

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - Please add a comment for each patch explaining what they do

 - Use the new %ldconfig_scriptlets macro instead of:

%post -p /sbin/ldconfig

%postun -p /sbin/ldconfig

   See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Removing_ldconfig_scriptlets#Upgrade.2Fcompatibility_impact

 - Build error:

BUILDSTDERR: /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.PWgKId: line 41: cd: libocxl-1.0: No such file or
directory

   Fix it by passing the correct directory to %setup:

%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}-RELEASE

 - You could replace:

%setup -q -n %{name}-%{version}-RELEASE
%patch1 -p1
%patch2 -p1
%patch3 -p1

   with: 

%autosetup -p1 -n %{name}-%{version}-RELEASE

 - Patch error:

+ /usr/bin/cat /builddir/build/SOURCES/irq_trace_ppc64.patch
+ /usr/bin/patch -p1 -s --fuzz=0 --no-backup-if-mismatch
Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected!  Assume -R? [n] 
Apply anyway? [n] 
1 out of 1 hunk ignored -- saving rejects to file src/irq.c.rej

Patch irq_trace_ppc64.patch is already applied in the 1.0 Release.

 - Own /usr/share/libocxl by removing the * in %files:

%{_datarootdir}/libocxl

[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/libocxl

Actually since it seems to be documentation, I believe it should be installed
in %{_pkgdocdir} (i.e /usr/share/doc/libocxl ). Since you're already patching
the Makefile, you could probably change the install directory of the docs.


 - The docs should be split in a separate noarch -docs subpackage:

[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
 is arched.
 Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 1228800 bytes in /usr/share

 - The Makefile doesn't keep timestamps while installing files. To fix this,
replace the occurrences of "install" with $(INSTALL), i.e.:

$(INSTALL) -m 0755 obj/$(LIBNAME) $(libdir)/
cp -d obj/libocxl.so obj/$(LIBSONAME) $(libdir)/
$(INSTALL) -m 0644 src/include/libocxl.h  $(includedir)/
$(INSTALL) -m 0644 -D docs/man/man3/* $(mandir)/man3
$(INSTALL) -m 0644 -D docs/html/*.* $(datadir)/libocxl
$(INSTALL) -m 0644 -D docs/html/search/* $(datadir)/libocxl/search

The $(INSTALL) variable is set up by the %make_install macro, replacing it with
install -p, which keeps timestamps.



Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Apache
 (v2.0)". 22 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
 licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/libocxl/review-
 libocxl/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
 Note: No known owner of /usr/share/libocxl
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
 Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/libocxl
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and 

[Bug 1559711] Review Request: libemu - The x86 shell-code detection and emulation

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559711



--- Comment #16 from Jason Tibbitts  ---
(fedrepo-req-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libemu

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563706] Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars - a game about hurling asteroids into the sun

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563706

Iwicki Artur  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1364745 (FE-GAMESIG)




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364745
[Bug 1364745] Games SIG tracker bug
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563706] New: Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars - a game about hurling asteroids into the sun

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563706

Bug ID: 1563706
   Summary: Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars -
a game about hurling asteroids into the sun
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: fed...@svgames.pl
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



spec: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.spec
srpm: https://svgames.pl/fedora/gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-4.src.rpm
koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26167013

Description: Take control of a lone planet whose star is dying. Use your
gravity beams to hurl nearby asteroids into the sun, feeding it some extra
matter. While saving the star, be sure to avoid being hit by the asteroids
yourself.

Fedora Account System Username: suve

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Hanns-Joachim Uhl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1523862



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Hanns-Joachim Uhl  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||bugpr...@us.ibm.com,
   ||hannsj_...@de.ibm.com
External Bug ID||IBM Linux Technology Center
   ||166425
 OS|Unspecified |Linux



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563668] Review Request: lxcfs - FUSE based filesystem for LXC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563668

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|POST
  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #2 from Christian Dersch  ---
Fine => Approved!


Package Review
==

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


= MUST items =

C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
 Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
 attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
 other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
 Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
 Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
 found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "FSF All Permissive", "Unknown or
 generated", "*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 50 files have unknown
 license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
 /home/lupinix/review/1563668-lxcfs/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
 names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
 Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[x]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
 (~1MB) or number of files.
 Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
 one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
 Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
 license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
 license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
 beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
 work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
 provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
 %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

= SHOULD items =

Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
 file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
 Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in lxcfs-
 debuginfo , lxcfs-debugsource
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the 

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Dan Horák  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|d...@danny.cz
  Flags|needinfo?(d...@danny.cz) |



--- Comment #2 from Dan Horák  ---
yup, taking

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.el7 has been submitted as an update to
Fedora EPEL 7.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-8657aca68a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc26 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9bf4ff4e55

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc28 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2897c3fdfa

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1560344] Review Request: python-pyev - Python binding for the libev library

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560344



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-pyev-0.9.0-0.1.20130610gite31d137.fc27 has been submitted as an update
to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f01e61f142

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Michel Normand  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||d...@danny.cz
  Flags||needinfo?(d...@danny.cz)



--- Comment #1 from Michel Normand  ---
Hello Dan, could you take this bug for review ?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563680] New: Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI accelerator

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563680

Bug ID: 1563680
   Summary: Package Review: libocxl library for OpenCAPI
accelerator
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 28
 Component: Package Review
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: norm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



spec: https://michelmno.fedorapeople.org/libocxl/libocxl.spec
srpm:
https://michelmno.fedorapeople.org/libocxl/SRPMS/libocxl-1.0-1.fc29.src.rpm

Summary: Allows to implement a user-space driver for an OpenCAPI accelerator

I built locally for rawhide and kept generated rpms in 
https://michelmno.fedorapeople.org/libocxl/RPMS/

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563668] Review Request: lxcfs - FUSE based filesystem for LXC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563668

Christian Dersch  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
 CC||lupinix.fed...@gmail.com
   Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|lupinix.fed...@gmail.com
  Flags||fedora-review?



--- Comment #1 from Christian Dersch  ---
Reviewing now

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1563668] New: Review Request: lxcfs - FUSE based filesystem for LXC

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563668

Bug ID: 1563668
   Summary: Review Request: lxcfs - FUSE based filesystem for LXC
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: thomas.mosc...@gmx.de
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL: https://thm.fedorapeople.org/lxcfs/lxcfs.spec
SRPM URL: https://thm.fedorapeople.org/lxcfs/lxcfs-3.0.0-1.fc29.src.rpm

Description:
LXCFS is a simple userspace filesystem designed to work around some
current limitations of the Linux kernel.

Specifically, it's providing two main things

- A set of files which can be bind-mounted over their /proc originals
  to provide CGroup-aware values.

- A cgroupfs-like tree which is container aware.

The code is pretty simple, written in C using libfuse.

The main driver for this work was the need to run systemd based
containers as a regular unprivileged user while still allowing systemd
inside the container to interact with cgroups.

Now with the introduction of the cgroup namespace in the Linux kernel,
that part is no longer necessary on recent kernels and focus is now on
making containers feel more like a real independent system through the
proc masking feature.

Fedora Account System Username: thm
Scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26164986

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1441023] Review Request: python-fontmake - Compile fonts from sources to binary

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1441023



--- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember  ---
Ping?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org