[Bug 1572070] Review Request: pass-otp - A pass extension for managing one-time-password (OTP) tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572070 --- Comment #1 from Juan Orti --- Copr: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jorti/pass-otp/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572070] New: Review Request: pass-otp - A pass extension for managing one-time-password (OTP) tokens
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572070 Bug ID: 1572070 Summary: Review Request: pass-otp - A pass extension for managing one-time-password (OTP) tokens Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: j.orti.alca...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/pass-otp/pass-otp.spec SRPM URL: https://jorti.fedorapeople.org/pass-otp/pass-otp-1.1.0-2.fc28.src.rpm Description: pass-otp extends the pass utility with the otp command for adding OTP secrets, generating OTP codes, and displaying secret key URIs using the standard otpauth:// scheme. Fedora Account System Username: jorti -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-bit64-0.9.7-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bb1747f65f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571524] Review Request: R-R.rsp - Dynamic Generation of Scientific Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-R.rsp-0.42.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c7266b8f1b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-sourcetools-0.1.7-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e48e127b2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571141] Review Request: R-mockr - Mocking in R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571141 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-mockr-0.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-a4809ace95 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571095] Review Request: R-ascii - Export R objects to several markup languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571095 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-ascii-2.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-099864dbc9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571140] Review Request: R-import - An Import Mechanism for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571140 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-import-1.1.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1bd1e13641 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572035] New: Review Request: cohomCalg - Sheaf cohomologies for line bundles on toric varieties
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572035 Bug ID: 1572035 Summary: Review Request: cohomCalg - Sheaf cohomologies for line bundles on toric varieties Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cohomCalg/cohomCalg.spec SRPM URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/cohomCalg/cohomCalg-0.32-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: This package computes sheaf cohomologies for line bundles on toric varieties. Fedora Account System Username: jjames This is a new dependency of Macaulay2. It bundles a library by the name of polylib, but (a) the last upstream polylib release was in 2010, and (b) that library has been modified by the cohomCalg maintainers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702 Brian Stinson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rbar...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(rbar...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #1 from Brian Stinson --- The %check step is going to run the unittests so we need buildrequires on: - python2-six - python2-mock - python2-pycodestyle - python3-six - python3-mock - python3-pycodestyle Otherwise, so far so good, I'll tag the output of fedora-review once we have an updated spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1558789] Review Request: R-orcutt - Estimate Procedure in Case of First Order Autocorrelation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558789 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- R-orcutt-2.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d69b03ef69 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572007] Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572007 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26562910 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1572007] New: Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572007 Bug ID: 1572007 Summary: Review Request: R-colorspace - Color Space Manipulation Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-colorspace.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-colorspace-1.3.2-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Carries out mapping between assorted color spaces including RGB, HSV, HLS, CIEXYZ, CIELUV, HCL (polar CIELUV), CIELAB and polar CIELAB. Qualitative, sequential, and diverging color palettes based on HCL colors are provided along with an interactive palette picker (with either a Tcl/Tk or a shiny -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571757] Review Request: squeezelite - Headless music player for streaming from Logitech Media Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571757 --- Comment #2 from Peter Oliver --- Thanks. I've added the missing scriptlets. SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/mavit/squeezelite/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00745564-squeezelite/squeezelite-1.8.7.1083-3.20180425git8386ece.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-bit64-0.9.7-2.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-415196871f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-bit64-0.9.7-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-1e2861d8a3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-bit64-0.9.7-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-bb1747f65f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571524] Review Request: R-R.rsp - Dynamic Generation of Scientific Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571524 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-R.rsp-0.42.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c7266b8f1b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571524] Review Request: R-R.rsp - Dynamic Generation of Scientific Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571524 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-sourcetools-0.1.7-1.fc26 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 26. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5e274d3548 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-sourcetools-0.1.7-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d984cce1de -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-sourcetools-0.1.7-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-7e48e127b2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571637] Review Request: rubygem-spy - Simple modern mocking library that uses the spy pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571637 --- Comment #3 from Fabio Valentini --- Thank you for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Ok, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571637] Review Request: rubygem-spy - Simple modern mocking library that uses the spy pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571637 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-spy -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 --- Comment #7 from Paul Gier --- Ok, I made the updates and submitted a new koji scratch build. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26561526 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571095] Review Request: R-ascii - Export R objects to several markup languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571095 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-ascii-2.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6e99f5f61b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1570360] Review Request: R-rmarkdown - Dynamic Documents for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570360 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-rmarkdown-1.9-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d60dacaa31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1563706] Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars - a game about hurling asteroids into the sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563706 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-811fef29b4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571141] Review Request: R-mockr - Mocking in R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571141 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-mockr-0.1-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-dffb769e7d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571140] Review Request: R-import - An Import Mechanism for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571140 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-import-1.1.0-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-aa4562e22f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1570347] Review Request: R-R.devices - Unified Handling of Graphics Devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570347 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-R.devices-2.15.1-2.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-ce37e66b1e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-sourcetools -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-bit64 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1374947] Review Request: vpcs - Virtual PC Simulator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374947 --- Comment #8 from nucleo --- Any news here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571524] Review Request: R-R.rsp - Dynamic Generation of Scientific Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571524 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-R.rsp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571095] Review Request: R-ascii - Export R objects to several markup languages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571095 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-ascii-2.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-72aed59c86 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571140] Review Request: R-import - An Import Mechanism for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-import-1.1.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-969e4265e5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571141] Review Request: R-mockr - Mocking in R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571141 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-mockr-0.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fc0b05d952 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1563706] Review Request: gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars - a game about hurling asteroids into the sun
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563706 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- gravity-beams-and-evaporating-stars-0-5.20180114git3f2aa58.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-6899423456 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1570360] Review Request: R-rmarkdown - Dynamic Documents for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570360 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-rmarkdown-1.9-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f39aedfe86 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1570952] Review Request: R-git2r - Provides Access to Git Repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570952 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-git2r-0.21.0-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0a3f76bd19 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1570347] Review Request: R-R.devices - Unified Handling of Graphics Devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570347 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-R.devices-2.15.1-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0d0a38df14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1539161] Review Request: moby-engine - The open-source application container engine
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539161 Frantisek Kluknavsky changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #15 from Frantisek Kluknavsky --- The statically linked binary is needed to run inside a container with unknown content. Other warnings seem quite minor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571287] Review Request: python-lightblue - A Python library to work with Lightblue database API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571287 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-lightblue -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571757] Review Request: squeezelite - Headless music player for streaming from Logitech Media Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571757
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- You need to run the systemd scriplets for service and user unit files. See
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Scriptlets?rd=Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#Systemd
%{?systemd_requires}
BuildRequires: systemd
Then:
%post
%systemd_post %{name}.service
%systemd_user_post %{name}.service
%preun
%systemd_preun %{name}.service
%systemd_user_preun %{name}.service
%postun
%systemd_postun_with_restart %{name}.service
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571637] Review Request: rubygem-spy - Simple modern mocking library that uses the spy pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571637
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package contains Requires: ruby(release).
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 45 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/rubygem-spy/review-rubygem-
spy/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gems,
/usr/share/gems/doc
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Ruby:
[x]: Platform dependent files must all go under %{gem_extdir_mri}, platform
independent under %{gem_dir}.
[x]: Gem package must not define a non-gem subpackage
[x]: Macro %{gem_extdir} is deprecated.
[x]: Gem package is named rubygem-%{gem_name}
[x]: Package contains BuildRequires: rubygems-devel.
[x]: Gem package must define %{gem_name} macro.
[x]: Pure Ruby package must be built as noarch
[x]: Package does not contain Requires: ruby(abi).
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Avoid bundling fonts in non-fonts packages.
Note: Package contains font files
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-
[Bug 1571619] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-trio - Make Sphinx better at documenting Python functions and methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571619
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated",
"*No copyright* Apache (v2.0)". 22 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-
sphinxcontrib-trio/review-python-sphinxcontrib-trio/licensecheck.txt
[x]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1513734] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-alertmanager - alertmanager for prometheus
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1513734 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Could you convert this package to the new Go style of packaging too? Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534052] Review Request: golang-github-mdlayher-netlink - Package netlink provides low-level access to Linux netlink sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534052 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- If you're ok with only packaging for F28 and later, you could switch to the new Go packaging like your other package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- The %changelog entry has a different version than the header:
R-sourcetools.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 0.1.6-1
['0.1.7-1.fc29', '0.1.7-1']
Package otherwise approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 50 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-sourcetools/review-R-sourcetools/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the pa
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1534044 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 [Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1512702 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 [Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1512702] Review Request: golang-github-prometheus-node_exporter - Prometheus exporter for hardware and OS metrics exposed by *NIX kernels
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1512702 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On|1534044 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044 [Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Blocks|1512702 |
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #6 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
I don't know why I thought you needed a sponsor, but you're already a member of
the packager group. I'll finish you review ASAP.
- Fix the line encodings for this file (with sed "s|\r||g"):
golang-github-beevik-ntp-devel.noarch: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/share/doc/golang-github-beevik-ntp-devel/README.md
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (2 clause)", "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review
/golang-github-beevik-ntp/review-golang-github-beevik-
ntp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages
[Bug 1571742] Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 --- Comment #1 from Daniel J. R. May --- I have just realized that I should have used the rawhide buildroot. Here are the correctd files: Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00745441-js-viewport-navigation/js-viewport-navigation.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00745441-js-viewport-navigation/js-viewport-navigation-0.5-1.fc29.src.rpm koji scratch build for f29: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26557232 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571542] Review Request: R-bit64 - A S3 Class for Vectors of 64bit Integers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571542
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Fix the line encodings:
R-bit64.x86_64: W: wrong-file-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/lib64/R/library/bit64/ANNOUNCEMENT-0.9-Details.txt
R-bit64.x86_64: E: wrong-script-end-of-line-encoding
/usr/lib64/R/library/bit64/exec/prebuild.sh
Package otherwise approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION, NEWS
- Package requires R-core.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 67 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-bit64/review-R-bit64/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not inc
[Bug 1571524] Review Request: R-R.rsp - Dynamic Generation of Scientific Reports
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571524
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION, NEWS
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL", "Unknown or generated". 436 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-R.rsp/review-R-R.rsp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
Note: Macros in: R-R.rsp (description)
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUI
[Bug 1534044] Review Request: golang-github-beevik-ntp - A simple ntp client written in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1534044
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|pg...@redhat.com|nob...@fedoraproject.org
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |
--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Split the description to stay below 80 characters per line:
%global common_description %{expand:
The ntp package is an implementation of a Simple NTP (SNTP) client based on
RFC5905. It allows you to connect to a remote NTP server and request
information about the current time.}
- Since you're packaging a Release, you should not use %global commit, which
is for dev snapshot, but instead move the Version: field before the %gometa
macro:
%global goipath github.com/beevik/ntp
Version:0.2.0
%global common_description %{expand:
The ntp package is an implementation of a Simple NTP (SNTP) client based on
RFC5905. It allows you to connect to a remote NTP server and request
information about the current time.}
%gometa
Name: %{goname}
Release:1%{?dist}
Summary:A simple NTP client written in Go
License:BSD
URL:%{gourl}
Source0:%{gosource}
That way %gometa will use the version info in lieu of the commit to gather
the Source.
a
- Don't assign the bug to yourself, the assignee should be the Reviewer, i.e,
me, but I let the bug as New / unassigned so that it stay visible in the Review
request list and visible for a potential sponsor. (I can't sponsor, you should
trx to find one by introducing yourself to the fedora devel mailing list)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571757] New: Review Request: squeezelite - Headless music player for streaming from Logitech Media Server
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571757 Bug ID: 1571757 Summary: Review Request: squeezelite - Headless music player for streaming from Logitech Media Server Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: ma...@mavit.org.uk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pagure.io/squeezelite-rpm/raw/master/f/squeezelite.spec SRPM URL: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4374/26554374/squeezelite-1.8.7.1083-2.20180424git8386ece.fc29.src.rpm Description: Squeezelite is a headless client for Logitech Media Server, and can be used in place of dedicated Squeezebox network music playing hardware. Fedora Account System Username: mavit -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571742] Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 Daniel J. R. May changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571742] New: Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571742 Bug ID: 1571742 Summary: Review Request: js-viewport-navigation - Scrolling viewport contents navigation menu for web pages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: daniel@danieljrmay.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation/fedora-27-x86_64/00745027-js-viewport-navigation/js-viewport-navigation.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation/fedora-27-x86_64/00745027-js-viewport-navigation/js-viewport-navigation-0.5-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: A JavaScript enhanced contents navigation menu which allows you to easily see where you are in a long HTML/XHTML document. Fedora Account System Username: danieljrmay koji scratch build for f27: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26542586 Hello This is my first package, and I am seeking a sponsor. I am the upstream maintainer for viewport-navigation which is hosted on GitHub: https://github.com/danieljrmay/viewport-navigation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571637] New: Review Request: rubygem-spy - Simple modern mocking library that uses the spy pattern
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571637 Bug ID: 1571637 Summary: Review Request: rubygem-spy - Simple modern mocking library that uses the spy pattern Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: decatho...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/decathorpe/rubygems-staging/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00745270-rubygem-spy/rubygem-spy.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/decathorpe/rubygems-staging/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00745270-rubygem-spy/rubygem-spy-0.4.5-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Spy is a mocking library that was made for the modern age. It supports only 1.9.3+. Spy by default will raise an error if you attempt to stub a method that doesn't exist or call the stubbed method with the wrong arity. Fedora Account System Username: decathorpe koji scratch build for rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26553326 Note: This package uses the new proposed packaging guidelines for rubygems (see https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/710). Also note that this package depends on the only recently reviewed and built rubygem-pry-nav, so you might have to pass the --enablerepo=local mock option to fedora-review to be able to build the package locally, depending on when the package gets pushed into the repos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571619] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-trio - Make Sphinx better at documenting Python functions and methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571619 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1559659 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1559659 [Bug 1559659] pytest-3.5.1 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571619] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-trio - Make Sphinx better at documenting Python functions and methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571619 Bug ID: 1571619 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-trio - Make Sphinx better at documenting Python functions and methods Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: thomas.mosc...@gmx.de QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-trio/python-sphinxcontrib-trio.spec SRPM URL: https://thm.fedorapeople.org/python-sphinxcontrib-trio/python-sphinxcontrib-trio-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: This sphinx extension helps you document Python code that uses async/await, or abstract methods, or context managers, or generators, or ... you get the idea. It works by making sphinx's regular directives for documenting Python functions and methods smarter and more powerful. The name is because it was originally written for the Trio project, and I'm not very creative. But don't be put off – there's nothing Trio- or async-specific about this extension; any Python project can benefit. (Though projects using async/await probably benefit the most, since sphinx's built-in tools are especially inadequate in this case.) Fedora Account System Username: thm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 921264] Review Request: weatherspect - ASCII art simulation of current weather
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=921264 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jruzi...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(jruzicka@redhat.c ||om) --- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar --- Fedora allows bundling now. Are you still interested in this package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1018859] Review Request: perl-Term-Clui - Term::Clui Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018859 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||k.georg...@atreides.org.uk Flags||needinfo?(k.georgiou@atreid ||es.org.uk) --- Comment #8 from Petr Pisar --- Could you please submit the EPEL-6 build to stable repository? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] New: Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 Bug ID: 1571590 Summary: Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-sourcetools.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-sourcetools-0.1.7-1.fc27.src.rpm Description: Tools for the reading and tokenization of R code. The 'sourcetools' package provides both an R and C++ interface for the tokenization of R code, and helpers for interacting with the tokenized representation of R code. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1571590] Review Request: R-sourcetools - Tools for Reading, Tokenizing and Parsing R Code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571590 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=26552377 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
