[Bug 1592952] Review Request: digidoc4-client - Application for digitally signing and encrypting documents

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592952



--- Comment #6 from Germano Massullo  ---
*** I have not officially taken the review ***

1) Spec file name must be: digidoc4-client.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I3V5FKUIOAZAINB7TFZOSPONY2CNR4X3/


[Bug 1279176] Review Request: isis - Framework to access a large variety of image processing libraries

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279176

Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sanjay.an...@gmail.com



--- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Hi Igor,

The src.fp.o doesn't contain a spec file for the package somehow. Could you
please double check? You may have forgotten to do the import. The spec/srpm are
still at your fedorapeople space. May I proceed with the import?

Cheers!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BRUK5IE757IEE7EZ42LE52S557WQ5XXW/


[Bug 1593893] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a DBIx::Class schema

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1593896
 Depends On||1592136, 1592780, 1592782




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592136
[Bug 1592136] Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - GraphViz2 Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592780
[Bug 1592780] Review Request: perl-ReadonlyX - Faster facility for creating
read-only scalars, arrays, hashes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592782
[Bug 1592782] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Gather - Implements the
Perl 6 'gather/take' control structure in Perl 5
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593896
[Bug 1593896] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer -
Viewer for DBIx::Class schema definitions
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XDQWFUBNPKAJTGUR5NFYVF35IK7A65HH/


[Bug 1592782] Review Request: perl-Syntax-Keyword-Gather - Implements the Perl 6 'gather/take' control structure in Perl 5

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592782

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1593893




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893
[Bug 1593893] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a
DBIx::Class schema
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K3UH4OFUIDZ5JZSRPSKJGOXX3Y6JUYQI/


[Bug 1593896] Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer - Viewer for DBIx:: Class schema definitions

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593896

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||1593893




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893
[Bug 1593893] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a
DBIx::Class schema
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G6R5OUOYFKNIEDXZK52JVG372TII7N2L/


[Bug 1592780] Review Request: perl-ReadonlyX - Faster facility for creating read-only scalars, arrays, hashes

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592780

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1593893




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893
[Bug 1593893] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a
DBIx::Class schema
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GEVZ6C5FMDEFFZOEKMWCTPG3HD2E5HAS/


[Bug 1592136] Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - GraphViz2 Perl module

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592136

Emmanuel Seyman  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||1593893




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893
[Bug 1593893] Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a
DBIx::Class schema
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4U7O2FA2UMNK4HY7C5HT7S5DNT5XXDTX/


[Bug 1593896] New: Review Request: perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer - Viewer for DBIx:: Class schema definitions

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593896

Bug ID: 1593896
   Summary: Review Request:
perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer - Viewer for
DBIx::Class schema definitions
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer/perl-Mojolicious-Plugin-DbicSchemaViewer-0.0200-1.fc28.src.rpm
Description:
This plugin is a definition viewer for DBIx::Class schemas. It lists
all result sources with column definitions and and their relationships
in table form and uses DBIx::Class::Visualizer to generate an
entity-relationship model.

Fedora Account System Username: eseyman

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5Z6NUD6LT7RTFBNEWYIKOVDR6JVN3JIR/


[Bug 1593893] New: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize a DBIx::Class schema

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1593893

Bug ID: 1593893
   Summary: Review Request: perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer - Visualize
a DBIx::Class schema
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
 Component: Package Review
  Severity: medium
  Priority: medium
  Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
  Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org



Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer/perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer/perl-DBIx-Class-Visualizer-0.0200-1.fc28.src.rpm

Description:
DBIx::Class::Visualizer is a GraphViz2 renderer for DBIx::Class schemas. It
is designed to be used as a backend to web applications that can display
the rendered graph in a more user friendly way. See
Mojolicious::Plugin::DbicSchemaViewer.

Fedora Account System Username: eseyman

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SBLZHO2LBNJ5ITLWNSBZQT4FQ4ZALWE2/


[Bug 1592136] Review Request: perl-GraphViz2 - GraphViz2 Perl module

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592136



--- Comment #2 from Emmanuel Seyman  ---
This should be much better.

Spec URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-GraphViz2/perl-GraphViz2.spec
SRPM URL:
http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-GraphViz2/perl-GraphViz2-2.47-2.fc28.src.rpm

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AZAFRBY5JPAO6RB7RVDNAKLX7ZLJTMEJ/


[Bug 1592780] Review Request: perl-ReadonlyX - Faster facility for creating read-only scalars, arrays, hashes

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592780

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
perl-ReadonlyX-1.04-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-d0bfaf3f7c

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VMRZXT3U2SL44QLFD5ASVC4YQKAD3QC3/


[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889
Bug 1465889 depends on bug 1488214, which changed state.

Bug 1488214 Summary: Review Request: deepin-manual - Deepin User Manual
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488214

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZKSTNU777QJMZCKWCQ4DI7J24BKC6GWV/


[Bug 1488214] Review Request: deepin-manual - Deepin User Manual

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1488214

Zamir SUN  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |CANTFIX
Last Closed||2018-06-21 11:21:53



--- Comment #6 from Zamir SUN  ---
Deepin take some of the files into their internal repo. So qcef is no longer
compilable outside of their company. As a result, deepin-manual is not able to
be packaged in Fedora. I am closing this request on behalf of the Deepin DE
packaging effort.

https://github.com/linuxdeepin/qcef/issues/3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/BTREBZ6DQQBTTF7YPRT436I4XXZBNUL3/


[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neo-0.6.1-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-09ab4c4289

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/C5R3OBR3K5CPC32OC3DUK2OORFFKOZXB/


[Bug 1592341] Review Request: nimbus-jose-jwt - Nimbus JOSE+JWT

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592341

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2018-06-21 11:01:11



--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System  ---
nimbus-jose-jwt-5.12-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AUUKJ5GLGBP3753AEAZZVFLJRM76LMDG/


[Bug 1578847] Review Request: python-collectd_systemd - Collectd plugin to monitor systemd services

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1578847



--- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-collectd_systemd-0.0.1-0.5.20180604gitbe9c647.el7 has been pushed to the
Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of
it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5MVLZPYIPOTQSISKH4N4YPHSINVFG3TR/


[Bug 1585557] Review Request: php-composer-xdebug-handler - Restarts a process without xdebug

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585557



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-composer-xdebug-handler-1.1.0-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/S62WILYL7HY7XOY6GXDNJYMBKRCIDCXY/


[Bug 1416705] Review Request: python-kivy - Kivy - Multimedia / Multitouch framework in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705



--- Comment #11 from MartinKG  ---
Spec URL: https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SPECS/python-kivy.spec
SRPM URL:
https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Review/SRPMS/python-kivy-1.10.1-1.fc28.src.rpm

%changelog
* Thu Jun 21 2018 Martin Gansser  - 1.10.1-1
- Update to 1.10.1
- Dropped patches
- Specfile cleanup

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DCSWSSRZB45STFGB5MRQN7SPZRTLN6Q5/


[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QPIEG7TACYAFYWHHGRQFRIBYNXKDMDFF/


[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System  ---
python-neo-0.6.1-2.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5d07d13a1a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MLF2XXCH3AUCRYLIIPMCS45TO7Z6MKBN/


[Bug 1591975] Review Request: rust-tokio-current-thread - Single threaded executor which manage many tasks concurrently

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591975

Igor Gnatenko  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Last Closed||2018-06-21 09:35:12



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TMGJUU24VHLIJ4HIE2QAS5AKVIMMTR27/


[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138

Pavel Zhukov  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from Pavel Zhukov  ---
(In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #5)

> I'd sooner just use a separate package and be done with it. I personally
> don't see the point/need to move it to another package as it's all dev docs
> but I don't have the time or interest to argue the point either.

Approved then.
I can help with maintainership if needed since I'm 0MQ/nanomsg user anyway.

fedora-review is quite old so reviewed manually: 

=== MUST === 
[+] : rpmlint must be run on the source rpm and all binary rpms the build
produces. The output should be posted in the review.[1] 
[+] [nng] : The package must be named according to the Package Naming
Guidelines .
[+] : The spec file name must match the base package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec unless your package has an exemption. [2] . 
[+] : The package must meet the Packaging Guidelines .
[+] [MIT] : The package must be licensed with a Fedora approved license and
meet the Licensing Guidelines .
[+] : The License field in the package spec file must match the actual license.
[3]
[+] : If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the
package must be included in %license.
[+] : The spec file must be written in American English.
[+] : The spec file for the package [+]  be legible.
[+] : The sources used to build the package must match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL. Reviewers should use sha256sum for this task as it is
used by the sources file once imported into git. If no upstream URL can be
specified for this package, please see the Source URL Guidelines for how to
deal with this.
[+] : The package [+]  successfully compile and build into binary rpms on at
least one primary architecture. [7]
[+] : If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an
architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in
ExcludeArch. Each architecture listed in ExcludeArch [+]  have a bug filed in
bugzilla, describing the reason that the package does not compile/build/work on
that architecture. The bug number [+]  be placed in a comment, next to the
corresponding ExcludeArch line. [8]
[+] : All build dependencies must be listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of the Packaging Guidelines ;
inclusion of those as BuildRequires is optional. Apply common sense.
[N/A] : The spec file [+]  handle locales properly. This is done by using the
%find_lang macro. Using %{_datadir}/locale/* is strictly forbidden.[9]
[+] : Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library
files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must
call ldconfig in %post and %postun. [10]
[+] : Packages must NOT bundle copies of system libraries.
[+] : If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state
this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for
relocation of that specific package. Without this, use of Prefix: /usr is
considered a blocker. 
[+] : A package must own all directories that it creates. If it does not create
a directory that it uses, then it should require a package which does create
that directory. 
[+] : A Fedora package must not list a file more than once in the spec file's
%files listings. (Notable exception: license texts in specific situations)
[+] : Permissions on files must be set properly. Executables should be set with
executable permissions, for example. 
[+] : Each package must consistently use macros. 
[+] : The package must contain code, or permissible content. 
[!] : Large documentation files must go in a -doc subpackage. (The definition
of large is left up to the packager's best judgement, but is not restricted to
size. Large can refer to either size or quantity). 
[+] : If a package includes something as %doc, it must not affect the runtime
of the application. To summarize: If it is in %doc, the program must run
properly if it is not present. [18]
[N/A] : Static libraries must be in a -static package.
[+] : Development files must be in a -devel package. 
[+] : In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base
package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} =
%{version}-%{release}
[+] : Packages must NOT contain any .la libtool archives, these must be removed
in the spec if they are built.
[N/A] : Packages containing GUI applications must include a %{name}.desktop
file, and that file must be properly installed with desktop-file-install in the
%install section. If you feel that your packaged GUI application does not need
a .desktop file, you must put a comment in the spec file with your exp

[Bug 1592138] Review Request: nng - nanomsg next generation: light-weight brokerless messaging

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1592138



--- Comment #5 from Peter Robinson  ---
(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #4)
> (In reply to Peter Robinson from comment #3)
> 
> > I can fix them on commit.
> OK.
> > 
> > Well they're all development API docs as opposed to generic docs a standard
> > use might want hence the reason I put them in devel, could go either way.
> What about
> Recommends: nng-doc 
> It will make both kind of users happy.

I'd sooner just use a separate package and be done with it. I personally don't
see the point/need to move it to another package as it's all dev docs but I
don't have the time or interest to argue the point either.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4XZ2CAIER2LYWGNPNXWA6QMQTRJ3IGH7/


[Bug 1585446] Kata Containers Package Review Tracker

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585446
Bug 1585446 depends on bug 1590436, which changed state.

Bug 1590436 Summary: Review Request: qemu-vanilla - OpenBIOS development 
utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590436

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MZAID3BX7TNO2SXHP2VHGVHHP2MS33F3/


[Bug 1590436] Review Request: qemu-vanilla - OpenBIOS development utilities

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1590436

Lokesh Mandvekar  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
Last Closed||2018-06-21 09:05:18



--- Comment #1 from Lokesh Mandvekar  ---
The patch present in qemu-vanilla has already been included in the default qemu
package/upstream. So, this package is no longer needed, we can just use the
default qemu package.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/N5ZUJY2ZSKHGIJFKHDRYTO3DGXZ2BPWK/


[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099



--- Comment #13 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-neo

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APVXCJWH5BVIK2FJG5NXFCHK4CDYDJSQ/


[Bug 1591975] Review Request: rust-tokio-current-thread - Single threaded executor which manage many tasks concurrently

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1591975



--- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla  ---
(fedscm-admin):  The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-tokio-current-thread

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KAUB7MMQFTEGS5BT66WK4D3W7QBY2GME/


[Bug 1150099] Review Request: python-neo - Represent electrophysiology data in Python

2018-06-21 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1150099



--- Comment #12 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)  ---
Thanks very much for the review!

Requesting pagure repo now.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/6UAGEW23WAQHW2MI2EXLHX3WHT6PLHYZ/