[Bug 1416705] Review Request: python-kivy - Kivy - Multimedia / Multitouch framework in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1416705 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|AwaitingSubmitter | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NGCXAIHCJ6V3W76NG4R4KPDNOELZZHQ2/
[Bug 1520922] Review Request: extractpdfmark - Extract page mode and named destinations as PDFmark from PDF
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1520922 --- Comment #25 from William Moreno --- If so please close this bug and paste a link to the complete build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QMLWORBE5I2TQXFWQ3MH6IJOPWGIQ4FS/
[Bug 1577217] Review Request: python-gitlab - Interact with GitLab API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1577217 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-gitlab-1.3.0-3.el7.1 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5XK6M5VB7VBIYEPHDDV3N65ZGNYSZDW4/
[Bug 1596964] Review Request: rust-rand_core - Core random number generator traits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596964 Josh Stone changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1581004 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581004 [Bug 1581004] rust-rand-0.5.3 is available -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/APEZ624B3IPOK74HL2XDBTG3FDEMFNVX/
[Bug 1596964] New: Review Request: rust-rand_core - Core random number generator traits
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596964 Bug ID: 1596964 Summary: Review Request: rust-rand_core - Core random number generator traits Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jist...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-rand_core/rust-rand_core.spec SRPM URL: https://jistone.fedorapeople.org/review/rust-rand_core/rust-rand_core-0.2.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Core random number generator traits and tools for implementation. Fedora Account System Username: jistone -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TGMI5AHBS6GFWR5HGSAVYC6WXH2RP4FV/
[Bug 1543377] Review Request: python3-saml - Add SAML support to your Python software using this library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543377 Bug 1543377 depends on bug 1543334, which changed state. Bug 1543334 Summary: Review Request: python-xmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543334 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TXZQTKKFOUDPFWUEDBNUPJBQQ23JAOCP/
[Bug 1543334] Review Request: python-xmlsec - Python bindings for the XML Security Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543334 Jeremy Cline changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-06-30 19:22:59 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3SAEUDG2UNHWN45TTOI6XNKTTGOGIFMB/
[Bug 1543377] Review Request: python3-saml - Add SAML support to your Python software using this library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1543377 Jeremy Cline changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED CC||jcl...@redhat.com Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-06-30 19:22:50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/T72CHYGL2YQGYIRHOI7BFSMYPTQU6LMD/
[Bug 1596366] Review Request: python-django-helpdesk - Django-helpdesk - A Django powered ticket tracker for small enterprise.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596366 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Wait for the releng team to unretire it? I would have made a separate bug for the unretirement and closed the first one. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FUMMWRD35OU7JXHDHP7ZUHI6WMTWUT2C/
[Bug 1596366] Review Request: python-django-helpdesk - Django-helpdesk - A Django powered ticket tracker for small enterprise.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596366 --- Comment #2 from Luis Bazan --- Thanks Robert I have the ticket https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7443 in releng What is the next step? Best! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7TC6NIQBKZRRVWL5QLEKSQXBB5I4J2LV/
[Bug 1596922] Review Request: python-pipdeptree - Command line utility to show dependency tree of package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596922
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Do your best to run the tests.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 15 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-pipdeptree/review-python-
pipdeptree/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Binary eggs must be removed in %prep
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should
[Bug 1596801] Review Request: python-pyqtchart - Set of Python bindings for The Qt Charts library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596801 --- Comment #6 from Rex Dieter --- I stand corrected (iirc I was told otherwise in irc awhile back), https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Naming#Python_source_package_naming "Source packages for Python modules SHOULD be named using the python- prefix." sorry for the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7YK2M3VC3343R5WUZKHPW5Z3QNDSRVFQ/
[Bug 1596801] Review Request: python-pyqtchart - Set of Python bindings for The Qt Charts library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596801 --- Comment #5 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Rex Dieter from comment #3) > Sorry for late comment, but... I think this package can omit the python-* > prefix, since it already has py* in the name. I disagree. This once was the case but is not for years. > I've been planning on submitting name change review for python-qt5 (to match > upstream name of PyQt5 or at least pyqt5) since that requirement had been > dropped from python naming guidelines awhile back Yes, it should be named python-pyqt5 (or, theoretically python-PyQt5). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KTY2WZT62D7Z6LAEYT5NF2HO3XLNROFG/
[Bug 1596801] Review Request: python-pyqtchart - Set of Python bindings for The Qt Charts library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596801 --- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter --- I guess in practice, that only affects the src.rpm, the binary subpkgs will still require python(2|3)-* , so , not a big deal -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/SU6F47I4O5H23AW4HEIHPEVPCSYJIC5D/
[Bug 1596801] Review Request: python-pyqtchart - Set of Python bindings for The Qt Charts library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596801 --- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter --- Sorry for late comment, but... I think this package can omit the python-* prefix, since it already has py* in the name. I've been planning on submitting name change review for python-qt5 (to match upstream name of PyQt5 or at least pyqt5) since that requirement had been dropped from python naming guidelines awhile back -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/CGSXQU3MXJR4KTH3NHLX4KQ36ME5XOCG/
[Bug 1536780] Review Request: swift-lang - Apple' s Swift Programming Language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1536780 --- Comment #59 from Ron Olson --- I cleaned up the lldb stuff, but the headers in /usr/lib/swift/clang/include are indeed necessary; they're used when importing a module (e.g. Glibc, Foundation, Dispatch) into a Swift program. Spec URL: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang.spec SRPM 4.2-0.22.20180629gitdab0d8e.fc28.src.rpm for Fedora 28: https://tachoknight.fedorapeople.org/swift-lang/swift-lang-4.2-0.22.20180629gitdab0d8e.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AHQNMO33GEMOEP2GNIUS2RLS6R2FZ4JT/
[Bug 1596923] Review Request: python-yarg - An easy to use PyPI client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596923 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Some tests fail: BUILDSTDERR: tests.test_client (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR BUILDSTDERR: tests.test_parse (unittest.loader._FailedTest) ... ERROR BUILDSTDERR: == BUILDSTDERR: ERROR: test_client (unittest.loader._FailedTest) BUILDSTDERR: -- BUILDSTDERR: ImportError: Failed to import test module: test_client BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 153, in loadTestsFromName BUILDSTDERR: module = __import__(module_name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/yarg-0.1.9/tests/test_client.py", line 4, in BUILDSTDERR: from mock import call, MagicMock, patch BUILDSTDERR: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock' BUILDSTDERR: == BUILDSTDERR: ERROR: test_parse (unittest.loader._FailedTest) BUILDSTDERR: -- BUILDSTDERR: ImportError: Failed to import test module: test_parse BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 153, in loadTestsFromName BUILDSTDERR: module = __import__(module_name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/yarg-0.1.9/tests/test_parse.py", line 5, in BUILDSTDERR: from mock import call, MagicMock, patch BUILDSTDERR: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock' BUILDSTDERR: == BUILDSTDERR: ERROR: tests.test_client (unittest.loader._FailedTest) BUILDSTDERR: -- BUILDSTDERR: ImportError: Failed to import test module: tests.test_client BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 428, in _find_test_path BUILDSTDERR: module = self._get_module_from_name(name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 369, in _get_module_from_name BUILDSTDERR: __import__(name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/yarg-0.1.9/tests/test_client.py", line 4, in BUILDSTDERR: from mock import call, MagicMock, patch BUILDSTDERR: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock' BUILDSTDERR: == BUILDSTDERR: ERROR: tests.test_parse (unittest.loader._FailedTest) BUILDSTDERR: -- BUILDSTDERR: ImportError: Failed to import test module: tests.test_parse BUILDSTDERR: Traceback (most recent call last): BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 428, in _find_test_path BUILDSTDERR: module = self._get_module_from_name(name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/unittest/loader.py", line 369, in _get_module_from_name BUILDSTDERR: __import__(name) BUILDSTDERR: File "/builddir/build/BUILD/yarg-0.1.9/tests/test_parse.py", line 5, in BUILDSTDERR: from mock import call, MagicMock, patch BUILDSTDERR: ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'mock' BUILDSTDERR: -- BUILDSTDERR: Ran 51 tests in 0.022s BUILDSTDERR: FAILED (errors=4) It seems it needs: BuildRequires: python3dist(mock) Package approved, just fix the missing BuildRequires before import. Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Apache (v2.0)", "Unknown or generated". 44 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/python-yarg/review-python- yarg/licensecheck.txt [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.6/site- packages/tests/__pycache__(python3-repoze-who-plugins-sa, python3-oauth2), /usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/t
[Bug 1564649] Review Request: lua-lxc - Lua binding for LXC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564649 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-06-30 05:28:07 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Moschny --- Finally imported and built for rawhide. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3VVFVNFP6AHWNZPGATDOELRSWMV3WFPR/
[Bug 1564652] Review Request: python3-lxc - Python binding for LXC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1564652 Thomas Moschny changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-06-30 04:57:52 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Moschny --- Finally imported and built for rawhide. Thanks for the review! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FPRTBJHUT6OCKHFPKFU4Z6KTQRGC6PBO/
[Bug 1596922] Review Request: python-pipdeptree - Command line utility to show dependency tree of package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596922 --- Comment #1 from Dhanesh B. Sabane --- Made a mistake with the links. My bad. Spec URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/raw/master/f/python-pipdeptree/python-pipdeptree.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/blob/master/f/python-pipdeptree/python-pipdeptree-0.12.1-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/RN27I5TMQW4JF5PEO46XY6BXWQMGSBCZ/
[Bug 1596923] New: Review Request: python-yarg - An easy to use PyPI client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596923 Bug ID: 1596923 Summary: Review Request: python-yarg - An easy to use PyPI client Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dhanes...@disroot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/raw/master/f/python-yarg/python-yarg.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/blob/master/f/python-yarg/python-yarg-0.1.9-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Yarg is an easy to use PyPI client built on top of Python's requests library. Fedora Account System Username: dhanesh95 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XE5EMRXUXIUHUJMRG4NUHDBNWHOLV4EJ/
[Bug 1596922] New: Review Request: python-pipdeptree - Command line utility to show dependency tree of package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1596922 Bug ID: 1596922 Summary: Review Request: python-pipdeptree - Command line utility to show dependency tree of package Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: dhanes...@disroot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/raw/master/f/python-pipdeptree/python-pipdeptree.spec SRPM URL: https://pagure.io/rpm-packaging/blob/master/f/python-pipdeptree/python-pipdeptree.spec Description: pipdeptree is a command line utility for displaying the installed python packages in form of a dependency tree. It works for packages installed globally on a machine as well as in a virtualenv. Fedora Account System Username: dhanesh95 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5XLQKDEZFT3ACILK4A5OH233NCLYOPN7/
