[Bug 1609595] Review Request: slirp4netns - slirp for network namespaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609595 Akihiro Suda changed: What|Removed |Added CC||suda.ky...@gmail.com --- Comment #5 from Akihiro Suda --- Thanks for packaging this! nit: you don't need to include `go-md2man` in `BuildRequires`, because the repo contains pre-compiled man -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/M3GQBCCDVHYSNVVNOTKXJFV4TB47R26T/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-pkgbuild-1.0.0-1.fc27 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 27. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0eda0d479d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KU3UQAR7LF3EYFLFM7DFEVKNUVADLGSJ/
[Bug 1610625] Review Request: R-pkgload - Simulate Package Installation and Attach
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610625 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28750955 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/UHKW7SPCXVDKZNE2ZAPCUHF7AA7RBLKE/
[Bug 1610625] New: Review Request: R-pkgload - Simulate Package Installation and Attach
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610625 Bug ID: 1610625 Summary: Review Request: R-pkgload - Simulate Package Installation and Attach Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-pkgload.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-pkgload-1.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Simulates the process of installing a package and then attaching it. This is a key part of the 'devtools' package as it allows you to rapidly iterate while developing a package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YPIMDSA6KWABKKLXZPHOC667V53KCESF/
[Bug 1404434] Container Review Request: calc - Arbitrary-precision arithmetic system and calculator — in a container!
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1404434 Brian Clark changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bsclar...@gmail.com --- Comment #2 from Brian Clark --- I also had a hard time trying to use this app. Building against a container that should probably be EOL. Despite that it seems to build. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/R6TTR7PAFPNUEHMOT6YEHNPDMXF7V4NJ/
[Bug 1494915] Review Request: libreoffice-online - LibreOffice Online Web Socket Daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1494915
Robert Scheck changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redhat-bugzilla@linuxnetz.d
||e
--- Comment #7 from Robert Scheck ---
The %post section IMHO looks very dubious, my thoughts and suggestions:
- http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.7.0#POSIX.1edraft15filecapabilities says
there is %caps() meanwhile, thus no need for direct setcap calls, I would
guess.
- Why is %{_localstatedir}/cache/loolwsd created and owned rather using
%attr(750, lool, lool) %{_localstatedir}/cache/loolwsd in %files?
- Why is %{_localstatedir}/cache/loolwsd/* removed in %post? That maybe
should be documented inside of the spec file...if really needed.
- Why does loolwsd need a directory on the same filesystem like LibreOffice?
And shouldn't something like this (if really needed) either go to a
systemd unit file as ExecStartPre or just get part of %files? There is no
documented reason why it has to be on the same filesystem...or?
Could you add bugzilla "depends on" for the missing nodejs dependencies (if
there are meanwhile individual review requests) so that somebody can easily
see which dependencies are missing?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/7VRB5B7BW2DRZI5W2HQIIPW56YM6U7JO/
[Bug 1610554] Review Request: hsxkpasswd - Secure memorable password generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610554 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Alias||perl-Crypt-HSXKPasswd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/DPMLYUHCT5FVXPHQTP3LWNBDJUZGCB5G/
[Bug 1610554] New: Review Request: hsxkpasswd - Secure memorable password generator
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610554 Bug ID: 1610554 Summary: Review Request: hsxkpasswd - Secure memorable password generator Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/hsxkpasswd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00782843-hsxkpasswd/hsxkpasswd.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/hsxkpasswd/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00782843-hsxkpasswd/hsxkpasswd-3.6-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A secure memorable password generator inspired by the wonderful XKCD webcomic at http://www.xkcd.com/ and Steve Gibson's Password Haystacks page at https://www.grc.com/haystack.htm. This is the Perl module that powers https://www.xkpasswd.net. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/EJNSV5BMMJLKIKJ2KLVJVQDAHCYYQH3A/
[Bug 1566702] Review Request: python-transitions - A lightweight, object-oriented finite state machine implementation in Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1566702 Randy Barlow changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(rbar...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #2 from Randy Barlow --- Hey Brian! I *finally* got around to fixing this. Sorry it took me so long. Upstream made a few releases, so I also updated to a newer version: Spec URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions.spec SRPM URL: https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/python-transitions-0.6.8-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FGYQZIFQBOAUEGGLVRDJ5TXPRJW4CZRX/
[Bug 1364736] Review Request: python-stackclimber - Allow a function to discover the module or script name of its caller , or its caller's caller.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364736 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/72ANODE2FJDJVT44CG653OAYMLS3IK7L/
[Bug 1244315] Review Request: rpmdistro-gitoverlay - Manage an overlay repository of RPMs from upstream git
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244315 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OKK635OF4OFIPHCKT7HNT7XZEJOHIJOJ/
[Bug 1364737] Review Request: python-magiclog - Easy logger management for libraries and CLI tools.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364737 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/Z77YPXGOVN3T3I5ZIZLHL5HU2LJ5KJK2/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/YVZT4WFT43Q4NZ44Q4JYHDUPF2LCZ4QI/
[Bug 1293043] Review Request: python-epac - Machine learning workflow builder
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1293043 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/337CIIHLAVPFTQ7GKAUE42OXL44LTXVU/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-pkgbuild-1.0.0-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-0ec54a57d5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QJ7H64YQ3NAOE67TC3MA4AGNSR3FW3N7/
[Bug 1280141] Review Request: python-psychopy - Psychophysics toolkit for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1280141 Paul W. Frields changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|ignate...@redhat.com|i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OKMMKFOFFYPBLUII26UZVO4WQWCLYTQ7/
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 Sergio Monteiro Basto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed|2018-07-30 00:02:15 |2018-07-31 16:07:32 --- Comment #12 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- Thank you . About BR gcc, I'll see how the other Qt / KDE packages behave -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2YMTKNVB3LO37NG7LLYE5KXJQXIVIRKL/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-pkgbuild -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HK4AAH352HYFIFLTAHTIZSE2XUOIFKNS/
[Bug 1609598] Review Request: fuse-overlayfs - FUSE overlay+shiftfs implementation for rootless containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609598 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- fuse-overlayfs-0.1-4.dev.git79c70fd.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-345884d092 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4JZJUMTCXSRKXXIFQLO2DLRHAWTL7M5W/
[Bug 1609595] Review Request: slirp4netns - slirp for network namespaces
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- slirp4netns-0.1-1.dev.gitc4e1bc5.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-fcb5dcd67e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VZSUG3XDBU5HLRMUMWIV54UTGGCXFYQR/
[Bug 1581865] Review Request: flatpak-module-tools - Tools for maintaining Flatpak applications and runtimes as Fedora modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-module-tools-0.6-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3210cc23f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/GDXQJYCRO235WO434Z77EJJEYOBBCCGN/
[Bug 1609285] Review Request: chafa - Image-to-text converter for terminal
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609285 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- chafa-0.9.0-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-735c2ef695 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/66IGW24M6DXLWXPPHIUYMBFY3H3QNHNI/
[Bug 1607215] Review Request: R-diffobj - Diffs for R Objects
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607215 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-diffobj-0.1.11-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-e71bb8a3c0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VOUXXW2R4CUHR2KOKOOD5IES7GFVL24Y/
[Bug 1607718] Review Request: R-igraph - Network Analysis and Visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607718 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- R-igraph-1.2.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-02b1005353 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/77NLXJJBR7YM6XHZFGVEU2TQQGFH3VND/
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 --- Comment #11 from Igor Gnatenko --- Relying on transitive dependencies is bad. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/OLY566EI4BDNZQ4NOYGG7RORNWA3P6SV/
[Bug 1601205] Review Request: python-geoplot - High-level geospatial plotting for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601205 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- python-geoplot-0.2.0-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AZCUNSDTXA4GCFJMM5JYN43V4JTTQ6JZ/
[Bug 1600814] Review Request: R-nanotime - Nanosecond-Resolution Time for R
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600814 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 14:02:53 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- R-nanotime-0.2.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WQA3H3CQMJD73YSOPQ3JJJW6VRVYKBB3/
[Bug 1602111] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud - Sakura Cloud DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602111 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 14:02:28 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud-0.26.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/QJGFXTKS4HKT3F3MACV4XA6HXXYXWJ2D/
[Bug 1602109] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-ovh - OVH DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602109 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 14:02:25 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-ovh-0.26.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/VT7K4R44N3RJTMWSHBL35M5XNVHVLJGK/
[Bug 1602091] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-linode - Linode DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602091 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 14:02:23 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-linode-0.26.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/G3NIKDDPRLAZS32M3ILJYY3JDFHEXT6N/
[Bug 1597862] Review Request: gr-hpsdr - GNU Radio modules for OpenHPSDR Hermes / Metis and Red Pitaya using the OpenHpsdr protocol
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1597862 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- gr-hpsdr-1.2-4.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3QGV4ROO36RJ2IQPGRBQUV7K53LDRTUT/
[Bug 1602080] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-gehirn - Gehirn Infrastructure Service DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602080 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 14:02:21 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-gehirn-0.26.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/5TZ2AIBYRHLBAWMFXJ2WEXTAAWHLLBJ5/
[Bug 1610249] Review Request: perl-Monkey-Patch - Scoped monkey-patching Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610249 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Monkey-Patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TX4YXQE4A3KT47BUVMLWJ4NCUMYVMI44/
[Bug 1610231] Review Request: perl-Sub-Delete - Perl module to delete subroutines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610231 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Sub-Delete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/PYMU2SB7QAVNTDNXMPIOIC6K2PURJZI4/
[Bug 1601205] Review Request: python-geoplot - High-level geospatial plotting for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601205 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2018-07-31 13:13:06 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-geoplot-0.2.0-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/B55XXGFQQ6JYQSQVBTQ45CMMZNZC2YBP/
[Bug 1602109] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-ovh - OVH DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602109 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-ovh-0.26.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/AJUYZAT6AIHD73GK6AZOHRYQE4UBVOOW/
[Bug 1602111] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud - Sakura Cloud DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602111 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-sakuracloud-0.26.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XK6WEQPTJ7LGKSH56AYIG4JUOEEYBQHH/
[Bug 1601328] Review Request: python-pytest-mpl - pytest plugin for testing figure output from Matplotlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1601328 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pytest-mpl-0.9-2.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/KNEX753KFTMYVVRMOGZBY6FYN5QCPEAZ/
[Bug 1602080] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-gehirn - Gehirn Infrastructure Service DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602080 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-gehirn-0.26.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/MXTE36ZBLO76YZNLET3L5XQYEPA76LQB/
[Bug 1602091] Review Request: python-certbot-dns-linode - Linode DNS Authenticator plugin for Certbot
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1602091 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- python-certbot-dns-linode-0.26.1-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/WTXXZMJVVDCRX7EEU72COJ26QJEVM45P/
[Bug 1374035] Review Request: pimd - The original PIM-SM multicast routing daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1374035 --- Comment #13 from John W. Linville --- https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/7542 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/JNBW7YWGWDRZJNPX7XBXD6CJS3DXVIML/
[Bug 1610249] Review Request: perl-Monkey-Patch - Scoped monkey-patching Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610249
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Not really needed:
%if 0%{?_licensedir:1}
%license LICENSE
%else
%doc LICENSE
%endif
All Fedora and EPEL supports %license
- Add a comment explaining what does this patch do:
Patch0:01_fix_pod.patch
URL and Source addresses are Ok.
Source archive (SHA-256:
fcd7adbc81418d4dea3b993f4f02802d5ab7c6774b244dc5fd5115ec48cc58c2) is original.
Ok.
Summary verified from lib/Monkey/Patch.pm. Ok.
Description verified from lib/Monkey/Patch.pm. Ok.
License verified from README. Ok.
No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok.
All tests pass. Ok.
$ rpmlint perl-Monkey-Patch.spec
review-perl-Monkey-Patch/results/perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.fc29.noarch.rpm
review-perl-Monkey-Patch/results/perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.fc29.src.rpm
perl-Monkey-Patch.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Monkey-Patch/LICENSE
2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 0 warnings
$ rpm -q -lv -p perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.fc29.noarch.rpm
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:38
/usr/share/doc/perl-Monkey-Patch
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 169 juil. 17 2010
/usr/share/doc/perl-Monkey-Patch/CHANGES
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 314 juil. 17 2010
/usr/share/doc/perl-Monkey-Patch/README
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:38
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Monkey-Patch
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot18249 juil. 17 2010
/usr/share/licenses/perl-Monkey-Patch/LICENSE
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2212 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/man/man3/Monkey::Patch.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1317 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/man/man3/Monkey::Patch::Handle.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1226 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/man/man3/Monkey::Patch::Handle::Class.3pm.gz
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1229 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/man/man3/Monkey::Patch::Handle::Object.3pm.gz
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3418 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch.pm
drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch/Handle
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2971 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch/Handle.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 697 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch/Handle/Class.pm
-rw-r--r--1 rootroot 646 juil. 31 17:37
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Monkey/Patch/Handle/Object.pm
File permissions and layout are Ok.
$ rpm -q --requires -p perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.fc29.noarch.rpm | sort -f |
uniq -c
1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0)
1 perl(base)
1 perl(Exporter)
1 perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle)
1 perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle::Class)
1 perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle::Object)
1 perl(Scalar::Util)
1 perl(strict)
2 perl(Sub::Delete)
2 perl(SUPER)
1 perl(warnings)
1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1
Binary requires are Ok.
$ rpm -q --provides -p perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.fc29.noarch.rpm
perl(Monkey::Patch) = 0.03
perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle) = 0.03
perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle::Class) = 0.03
perl(Monkey::Patch::Handle::Object) = 0.03
perl-Monkey-Patch = 0.03-1.fc29
Binary provides are Ok.
Package builds in mock F29.
Ok
The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines.
Resolution: Package approved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HR7DUPPINRXNPT74FRQUQ2VFN3EXIK7J/
[Bug 1610231] Review Request: perl-Sub-Delete - Perl module to delete subroutines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610231 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- URL and Source addresses are Ok. Source archive (SHA-256: 4435a70b01a80d6e91dd3749f29734cf2c36207e7aeb537d8c96d231fe2951ee) is original. Ok. Summary verified from lib/Sub/Delete.pm. Ok. Description verified from lib/Sub/Delete.pm. Ok. License verified from lib/Sub/Delete.pm and README. Ok. No XS code, noarch BuildArch is Ok. All tests pass. Ok. $ rpmlint perl-Sub-Delete.spec review-perl-Sub-Delete/results/perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.fc29.noarch.rpm review-perl-Sub-Delete/results/perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.fc29.src.rpm perl-Sub-Delete.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undefine -> undefined, defined, define perl-Sub-Delete.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undef -> unfed, under, funded perl-Sub-Delete.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undefine -> undefined, defined, define perl-Sub-Delete.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US undef -> unfed, under, funded 2 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. $ rpm -q -lv -p perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.fc29.noarch.rpm drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:15 /usr/share/doc/perl-Sub-Delete -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 1183 avril 15 2010 /usr/share/doc/perl-Sub-Delete/Changes -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 2181 juil. 31 17:15 /usr/share/man/man3/Sub::Delete.3pm.gz drwxr-xr-x2 rootroot0 juil. 31 17:15 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Sub -rw-r--r--1 rootroot 3791 avril 13 2010 /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Sub/Delete.pm File permissions and layout are Ok. $ rpm -q --requires -p perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.fc29.noarch.rpm | sort -f | uniq -c 1 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.28.0) 1 perl(:VERSION) >= 5.8.3 1 perl(constant) 1 perl(Exporter) >= 5.57 1 rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1 1 rpmlib(FileDigests) <= 4.6.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1 1 rpmlib(PayloadIsXz) <= 5.2-1 Binary requires are Ok. $ rpm -q --provides -p perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.fc29.noarch.rpm perl(Sub::Delete) = 1.2 perl-Sub-Delete = 1.2-1.fc29 Binary provides are Ok. Package builds in F29 (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28740994) Ok The package is in line with Fedora and Perl packaging guidelines. Resolution: Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ALVIVGYVHK36QX2X6CLD6TWKDYEWZYV7/
[Bug 1607718] Review Request: R-igraph - Network Analysis and Visualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1607718 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- R-igraph-1.2.2-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-94231bc95e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/73KMZAQEARITNDLBTDRAXM4YBYDC6QOO/
[Bug 1594765] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594765 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- idris-1.3.0-4.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-db77a2e3d8 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NSZRPUAWI5EEFVZQ5VSM2DZEPFN4VQPM/
[Bug 1594765] Review Request: idris - Functional Programming Language with Dependent Types
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594765 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2P6TPX6X7MDES4ATT56NTUXJD5JE4GPH/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 54 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-pkgbuild/review-R-pkgbuild/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should
[Bug 1610164] Review Request: ghc-unliftio - The MonadUnliftIO typeclass for unlifting monads to IO ( batteries included)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610164
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "MIT/X11 (BSD like)", "Unknown or generated". 25 files have
unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/ghc-unliftio/review-ghc-
unliftio/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[-]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Scriptlets must be sane, if used.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 --- Comment #10 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7) > Missing BuildRequires for compiler. Whether it is gcc or gcc-c++. Same question as Sergio, since gcc-c++ is already implied by the BR, is it necessary to add them? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/FBCUUFY3PQZFTCCQU7ILR2VHDLRVZJ3B/
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 --- Comment #9 from Sergio Monteiro Basto --- (In reply to Igor Gnatenko from comment #7) > Missing BuildRequires for compiler. Whether it is gcc or gcc-c++. [1] gcc and gcc-c++ appears in Installing dependencies, should I explicitly add BR gcc gcc-c++ ? Thanks https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28707198 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7198/28707198/root.log -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/LGB2IQEVWQYYJ5FTHAKDKUCOGWQGXWUK/
[Bug 1581865] Review Request: flatpak-module-tools - Tools for maintaining Flatpak applications and runtimes as Fedora modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/L4NAY5RQ5S4GFQUOWZIGF7Y24CROU3JN/
[Bug 1581865] Review Request: flatpak-module-tools - Tools for maintaining Flatpak applications and runtimes as Fedora modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1581865 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- flatpak-module-tools-0.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3210cc23f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/J4QNDPHSXXPWWWLDJHFMRGEC6SVFTYDT/
[Bug 1610249] New: Review Request: perl-Monkey-Patch - Scoped monkey-patching Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610249 Bug ID: 1610249 Summary: Review Request: perl-Monkey-Patch - Scoped monkey-patching Perl module Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: andrea.v...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~averi/RPMs/perl-Monkey-Patch/perl-Monkey-Patch.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~averi/RPMs/perl-Monkey-Patch/perl-Monkey-Patch-0.03-1.el7.src.rpm Description: Monkey patching is a way to extend or modify the runtime code of a program or library without altering the original source code. Monkey::Patch provides lexical scope monkey-patching so that you can wrap any other package's subroutine with your own code and still have access to the original subroutine. Fedora Account System Username: averi Build requires perl-Sub-Delete, currently in review (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610231), SRPM built using mockchain. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/72LEBRTTRUYCQHNZTBDHW3JQWVBVKCTM/
[Bug 1610231] New: Review Request: perl-Sub-Delete - Perl module to delete subroutines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610231 Bug ID: 1610231 Summary: Review Request: perl-Sub-Delete - Perl module to delete subroutines Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: andrea.v...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~averi/RPMs/perl-Sub-Delete/perl-Sub-Delete.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~averi/RPMs/perl-Sub-Delete/perl-Sub-Delete-1.2-1.el7.noarch.rpm Description: Sub::Delete provides one function, delete_sub, that deletes the subroutine whose name is passed to it. (To load the module without importing the function, write use Sub::Delete();.) This does more than simply undefine the subroutine in the manner of undef , which leaves a stub that can trigger AUTOLOAD (and, consequently, won't work for deleting methods). The subroutine is completely obliterated from the symbol table (though there may be references to it elsewhere, including in compiled code). Fedora Account System Username: averi -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IW77GJYDCF74ZNOA2P73H534PD3FPS3R/
[Bug 1610191] Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=28729564 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/2TGNXV7Q6YTJ7AKZZTEE6MZVMYY5WFBO/
[Bug 1610191] New: Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1610191 Bug ID: 1610191 Summary: Review Request: R-pkgbuild - Find Tools Needed to Build R Packages Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-pkgbuild.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-pkgbuild-1.0.0-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Provides functions used to build R packages. Locates compilers needed to build R packages on various platforms and ensures the PATH is configured appropriately so R can use them. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/XCTEAZVI2KODJRMCTUQUTTZGJLVJ6A32/
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 --- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kwave -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4A3HWWJSGPLOP7ULMSIUBF5XKEUXQ64L/
[Bug 1609629] Review Request: kwave - Sound Editor for KDE
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1609629 Igor Gnatenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i.gnatenko.br...@gmail.com --- Comment #7 from Igor Gnatenko --- Missing BuildRequires for compiler. Whether it is gcc or gcc-c++. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IJMH2FGWYAQITH2LGM3YOBPZDJOYEXRJ/
[Bug 1608484] Review Request: android-file-transfer - Reliable Android MTP client with minimalistic UI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1608484 Marek Blaha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2018-07-31 02:08:43 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/NYQKRGJXK6NDUURZNFP2Y3FOFTLRAIZA/
