[Bug 1638768] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768 --- Comment #5 from Kefu Chai --- corp build: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/tchaikov/libfmt/build/812180/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638768] Review Request: fmt - Small, safe and fast formatting library for C++
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638768
--- Comment #4 from Kefu Chai ---
to understand the reverse dependencies of fmt, i ran following commands on an
update-to-date fedora28:
$ for pkg in -devel "" -static -doc; do \
dnf repoquery -q --alldeps --whatrequires fmt$pkg; \
done
fmt-static-0:3.0.2-5.fc28.i686
fmt-static-0:3.0.2-5.fc28.x86_64
fmt-devel-0:3.0.2-5.fc28.i686
fmt-devel-0:3.0.2-5.fc28.x86_64
$ for pkg in -devel "" -static -doc; do \
dnf repoquery --archlist=src --repoid=fedora-source -q --whatrequires
fmt$pkg; \
done
# nothing returned
so i think it's safe to update fmt{,-devel,-doc} on fedora28. and the same is
very likely to be true on rawhive.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1632851] Review Request: Pencil2D - create animation using both bitmap and vector graphics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632851 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- Pencil2D-0.6.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-223ebd7b50 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1632851] Review Request: Pencil2D - create animation using both bitmap and vector graphics
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1632851 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- Pencil2D-0.6.2-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f76e2a5e24 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1640695] Review Request: udica - A tool for generating SELinux security policies for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640695 Neal Gompa changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ngomp...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|ngomp...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Neal Gompa --- Taking this review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1633741] Review Request: notify-python - Python bindings for libnotify
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1633741 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- notify-python-0.1.1-40.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-c900d4a96b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 Fabio Valentini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||decatho...@gmail.com --- Comment #106 from Fabio Valentini --- This just means that the package hasn't been added to koschei yet. (which is an optional service.) Everything else looks fine. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1640819] New: Review Request: perl-Wiki-Toolkit - Toolkit for building Wikis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640819 Bug ID: 1640819 Summary: Review Request: perl-Wiki-Toolkit - Toolkit for building Wikis Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Wiki-Toolkit/perl-Wiki-Toolkit.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-Wiki-Toolkit/perl-Wiki-Toolkit-0.85-1.fc28.src.rpm Description: Helps you develop Wikis quickly by taking care of the boring bits for you. You will still need to write some code - this isn't an instant Wiki. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman Rpmlint Output: 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638824] Review Request: kdsoap - Qt-based SOAP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638824 --- Comment #11 from Casper Meijn --- (In reply to Luis Segundo from comment #10) > I understand, if the license does not apply, it can be removed. I removed LICENSE.txt again > please check this last issue > > Issues: > === > - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) > in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) > for the package is included in %license. > Note: License file license.cpp is not marked as %license > See: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text I am not sure what you mean with this. I package LICENSE.GPL.txt and LICENSE.AGPL3-modified.txt, which are the two license under which we want use the code. The other license files are for a commercial license or LGPL. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00811928-kdsoap/kdsoap.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/caspermeijn/kdsoap/fedora-28-x86_64/00811928-kdsoap/kdsoap-1.7.0-1.fc28.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638968] Review Request: libneurosim - Common interfaces for neuronal simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968
--- Comment #3 from Antonio Trande ---
I made some changes to the SPEC file:
Compiler/linker flags are automatically set now; MPI compilers are now used.
Paths for Python MPI libraries are not those used, they should be
$MPI_PYTHON2_SITEARCH and $MPI_PYTHON2_SITEARCH.
About debuginfo packages, all libraries look not stripped when are compiled. I
left the '%global debug_package %{nil}' line, you need to ask to upstream for
studying what's happing.
Where are the '%{name}-openmpi(mpich)-common = %{version}-%{release}' packages?
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/GM1v~C6Y9MasgIPqH9i9AA
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638968] Review Request: libneurosim - Common interfaces for neuronal simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968 --- Comment #2 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) --- Thanks for taking up the review Antonio. Please let me know if I can review a package for you in return. Updated spec/srpm: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libneurosim/libneurosim.spec https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/libneurosim/libneurosim-0-0.20181018.git57b76e2.fc29.src.rpm Rawhide scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30313081 F29 scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30313079 Somehow, when I flip the flag to enable the py2 build, it fails: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=30313102 I'm not entirely sure why it does so. Would you have any clues? Cheers, Ankur -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #105 from Wim Taymans --- I saw this here: https://apps.fedoraproject.org/koschei/package/fdk-aac-free -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1638968] Review Request: libneurosim - Common interfaces for neuronal simulators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1638968 Antonio Trande changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|anto.tra...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #104 from Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) --- (In reply to Wim Taymans from comment #103) > Is there something else that needs to happen for this to become available in > Rawhide? I don't see anything wrong at least from the koji side: $ koji list-tagged f30 |grep fdk-aac fdk-aac-free-0.1.5-5.fc30 f30 wtaymans fdk-aac-free-0.1.6-1.fc30 f30 wtaymans $ koji wait-repo f30-build --build=fdk-aac-free-0.1.6-1.fc30 Successfully waited 0:02 for fdk-aac-free-0.1.6-1.fc30 to appear in the f30-build repo > Package is currently ineligible for scheduling due to following reasons: > * Package is not tracked > * Package dependencies were not resolved yet Where theses messages come from ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1501522] Review Request: fdk-aac-free - Third-Party Modified Version of the Fraunhofer FDK AAC Codec Library for Android
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522 --- Comment #103 from Wim Taymans --- Is there something else that needs to happen for this to become available in Rawhide? Package is currently ineligible for scheduling due to following reasons: * Package is not tracked * Package dependencies were not resolved yet -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1640695] New: Review Request: udica - A tool for generating SELinux security policies for containers
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640695 Bug ID: 1640695 Summary: Review Request: udica - A tool for generating SELinux security policies for containers Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lvra...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lvrabec/udica/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00809105-udica/udica.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/lvrabec/udica/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00809105-udica/udica-0.1.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Tool for generating SELinux security profiles for containers. The whole concept is based on "block inheritence" feature inside CIL intermediate language supported by SELinux userspace. The tool creates a policy which combines rules inherited from specified CIL blocks(templates) and rules discovered by inspection of container JSON file, which contains mountpoints and ports definitions. Fedora Account System Username: lvrabec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1640640] New: Review Request: perl-Convert-Base32 - Encoding and decoding of base32 strings
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1640640 Bug ID: 1640640 Summary: Review Request: perl-Convert-Base32 - Encoding and decoding of base32 strings Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: xav...@bachelot.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Spec URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SPECS/perl-Convert-Base32.spec SRPM URL: https://www.bachelot.org/fedora/SRPMS/perl-Convert-Base32-0.06-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: Encoding and decoding of base32 strings Fedora Account System Username: xavierb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565848] Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 --- Comment #16 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- > As pointed out on the mailing list and in #1539207, all distros other than > Fedora use the name bear. The general agreement on fedora devel was to rename > the current bear and use the name bear for the compilation database. Thank you. I retract my recommendation. Keep the name as bear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565848] Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 --- Comment #15 from Till Hofmann --- I disagree. As pointed out on the mailing list and in #1539207, all distros other than Fedora use the name bear. The general agreement on fedora devel was to rename the current bear and use the name bear for the compilation database. Imho, the package name should be just bear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565848] Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 --- Comment #14 from Darryl T. Agostinelli --- > I'd therefore keep the name, if that is unambiguous enough. I have also asked > upstream and the author would also be fine with calling it build-ear. Please use build-ear then. I think we can all imagine a future scenario where another project come along wanting to use the name "bear" and then this whole thing repeats itself. Since you say that upstream is fine with build-ear; then go with build-ear. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1546544] Review Request: bear-factory - renaming the bear package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|1565848 | Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 [Bug 1565848] Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1565848] Review Request: Bear - Tool that generates a compilation database for clang tooling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565848 Till Hofmann changed: What|Removed |Added CC||thofm...@fedoraproject.org Depends On|1546544 |1539207 --- Comment #13 from Till Hofmann --- The current bear package has been renamed, so this can now keep the name 'bear'. I would have preferred if you'd taken part in the ongoing effort to rename and package instead of just submitting your own review request without any prior coordination. But it's done now. If you can find a sponsor, I'd be happy to see this finished. Alternatively, I have a prepared SPEC here that I could submit for review. I'd be happy to have you as a co-maintainer, if we go down that road. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1539207 [Bug 1539207] Rename to bear-factory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1546544 [Bug 1546544] Review Request: bear-factory - renaming the bear package -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1639673] Review Request: fedora-chromium-config - Fedora customizations for Chromium/Chrome
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1639673 Tomas Popela changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In Version||fedora-chromium-config-1.0- ||0.fc30 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2018-10-18 06:07:14 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1600737] Review Request: python3-psycopg2 - PostgreSQL database adapter for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1600737 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jedelsky --- Hello, sorry for delay. I had some issues with doing the review and than hadn't time to check it more. Anyway, I need the package as a dependency as well, so I'll go through it asap. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
