[Bug 1684284] Review Request: FAudio - FNA is a reimplementation of the Microsoft XNA Game Studio 4.0 Refresh libraries

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684284

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FAudio-19.03-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-191d2c919b

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1680043] Review Request: toolbox - Unprivileged development environment

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680043



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System  ---
toolbox-0.0.6-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-59304a081d

--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System  ---
toolbox-0.0.6-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7a77a138f9

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1678682] Review Request: golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n - Translate your Go program into multiple languages

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1678682

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-03-03 02:47:10



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-1.10.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1671665] Review Request: phpunit8 - The PHP Unit Testing framework

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671665
Bug 1671665 depends on bug 1671663, which changed state.

Bug 1671663 Summary: Review Request: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage7 - PHP code 
coverage information
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671663

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1671662] Review Request: php-sebastian-global-state3 - Snapshotting of global state

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671662

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-03-03 02:46:57



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-sebastian-global-state3-3.0.0-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1671665] Review Request: phpunit8 - The PHP Unit Testing framework

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671665

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-03-03 02:47:00



--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System  ---
phpunit8-8.0.4-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1671663] Review Request: php-phpunit-php-code-coverage7 - PHP code coverage information

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671663

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed||2019-03-03 02:46:58



--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System  ---
php-phpunit-php-code-coverage7-7.0.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1671665] Review Request: phpunit8 - The PHP Unit Testing framework

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671665
Bug 1671665 depends on bug 1671662, which changed state.

Bug 1671662 Summary: Review Request: php-sebastian-global-state3 - Snapshotting 
of global state
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671662

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684719] Review Request: netdata - Real-time performance monitoring

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719



--- Comment #4 from Didier  ---
This issue is the result of a bad solution: force file to be executable in spec
to avoid a rpmlint issue. The good solution is to remove shebang (classes,
structs and functions definitions only) and delete this buggy fix in spec.
new rpm source:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/netdata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864006-netdata/netdata-1.12.2-2.fc30.src.rpm
new spec file:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/netdata/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864006-netdata/netdata.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1325477] Review Request: kalendas - Calculations of calendar and Julian Date

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325477

Robert-André Mauchin  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Flags|fedora-review?  |fedora-review+



--- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
LGTM, package approved.

You still need to find a sponsor.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1325477] Review Request: kalendas - Calculations of calendar and Julian Date

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1325477



--- Comment #4 from Mike Molina  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
>  - Group: is not used in Fedora
> 
>  -  This is not needed in %install
> 
>  rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> 
>  - This is not needed either:
> 
> %clean
> rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> 
> 
>  - Only use this one time, no need for the first one:
> 
> %find_lang %{name} --with-man
> 
>  - Separate your %changelog entries by an empty line
> 
>  - The license files must be installed with %license, not %doc:
> 
> %files -f %{name}.lang
> %license COPYING LICENCIA
> %doc README.md LEAME.md NEWS ChangeLog AUTHORS DEPENDENCIES
> 
>  - Please be more specific in %files:
> 
> %{_bindir}/kalendas
> %{_mandir}/man1/kalendas.1.*
> %{_infodir}/kalendas.info.gz
> 
>  - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
> 
>  - it would be nice to also split the BR for readability:
> 
> BuildRequires:  gcc
> BuildRequires:  texinfo >= 4.13a
> BuildRequires:  gettext >= 0.17
> BuildRequires:  perl-libintl >= 1.20
> BuildRequires:  pkgconfig(bash-completion)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Package Review
> ==
> 
> Legend:
> [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
> [ ] = Manual review needed
> 
> 
> Issues:
> ===
> - If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s)
>   in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s)
>   for the package is included in %license.
>   Note: License file COPYING is not marked as %license
>   See:
>   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines#License_Text
> 
> 
> = MUST items =
> 
> Generic:
> [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
>  other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
>  Guidelines.
> [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
>  Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
>  found: "FSF All Permissive License", "GPL (v3 or later)", "Unknown or
>  generated", "GNU Free Documentation License", "GPL (v7)", "GNU Free
>  Documentation License (v1.3 or later)", "Expat License", "GPL (v2 or
>  later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "FSF Unlimited License (with
>  Retention)". 64 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
>  licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/kalendas/review-
>  kalendas/licensecheck.txt
> [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
> [x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
> [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
> [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
> [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
> [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
> [x]: Texinfo files are installed using install-info in %post and %preun if
>  package has .info files.
>  Note: Texinfo .info file(s) in kalendas
> [x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
> [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
>  names).
> [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
> [x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
> [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
> [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
>  Provides are present.
> [x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
> [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
> [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
> [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
> [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
>  (~1MB) or number of files.
>  Note: Documentation size is 112640 bytes in 8 files.
> [x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
> [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
>  one supported primary architecture.
> [x]: Package installs properly.
> [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
>  Note: No rpmlint messages.
> [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
> [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
> [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
> [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
>  beginning of %install.
> [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
> [x]: Dist tag is present.
> [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
> [x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
> [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
>  work.
> [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
> [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
> [x]: Package is not relocatable.
> [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
>  provided in the spec URL.
> [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
>  %{name}.spec.
> [x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
> 

[Bug 1684719] Review Request: netdata - Real-time performance monitoring

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719



--- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin  ---
 - My bad, systemd-rpm-macros is Rawhide only apparently, use BuildRequires:
systemd instead.

 - There's another issue on Rawhide on your COPR:

*** ERROR: ambiguous python shebang in
/usr/libexec/netdata/python.d/python_modules/third_party/boinc_client.py:
#!/usr/bin/python. Change it to python3 (or python2) explicitly.


   Patch this file to use python 3.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1683873] Review Request: proj-datumgrid-world - World datum shift grids for Proj

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683873

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||proj-datumgrid-world-1.0-1.
   ||fc31
   ||proj-datumgrid-world-1.0-1.
   ||fc30
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2019-03-02 11:22:16



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684623] Review Request: ghc-th-reify-many - Recurseively reify template haskell datatype info

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684623



--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen  ---
Thank you for this review

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10113

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1683850] Review Request: proj-datumgrid-oceania - Oceania datum shift grids for Proj

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683850

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||proj-datumgrid-oceania-1.0-
   ||1.fc31
   ||proj-datumgrid-oceania-1.0-
   ||1.fc30
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2019-03-02 11:00:15



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684624] Review Request: ghc-th-orphans - Orphan instances for TH datatypes

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684624



--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen  ---
Thank you very much

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10112

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684625] Review Request: ghc-th-expand-syns - Expands type synonyms in Template Haskell ASTs

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684625



--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen  ---
Thanks for the review, Robert-André, "you are machine!!" :-)

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10111

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684726] Review Request: ghc-megaparsec - Monadic parser combinators

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684726



--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen  ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3)
>  - From your Koji build it should be:
> 
> BuildRequires:  ghc-hspec-discover
> 
> Package approved. Please fix the aforementioned issue before import.

Apologies for not refreshing the uploaded spec and srpm.

Thank you for the review! :-)

https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/10110

(I think I don't have any further reviews to file right now for F30, I hope.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1683847] Review Request: proj-datumgrid-north-america - North American datum shift grids for Proj

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683847

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||proj-datumgrid-north-americ
   ||a-1.1-1.fc31
   ||proj-datumgrid-north-americ
   ||a-1.1-1.fc30
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2019-03-02 10:38:52



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1683846] Review Request: proj-datumgrid-europe - European datum shift grids for Proj

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1683846

Elliott Sales de Andrade  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|POST|CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||proj-datumgrid-europe-1.1-1
   ||.fc31
   ||proj-datumgrid-europe-1.1-1
   ||.fc30
 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE
Last Closed||2019-03-02 10:38:01



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1684719] Review Request: netdata - Real-time performance monitoring

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684719



--- Comment #2 from Didier  ---
Hi Robert-André, thanks to review my package.

I have a strange build error now on local mock build and copr for el7 and all
fedora releases:
No matching package to install: 'systemd-rpm-macros'
But according to the guideline
(https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Systemd/) this
package must be installed if systemd is required. Where are the error ?

You can found a modified spec file here:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/tartare/netdata/fedora-29-x86_64/00863935-netdata/netdata.spec

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org


[Bug 1672598] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman - So you always leave a note

2019-03-02 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672598



--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade  ---
Spec URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman.spec
SRPM URL:
https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman-1.1.0-1.fc29.src.rpm

Description:
So you always leave a note

koji scratch build:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33138239

Updated to latest tag.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org