[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936
Didier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Didier ---
Read https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/More_Go_packaging for Guidelines.
No problem detected, package approved
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[X]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[X]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat License". 1 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /tmp/1684936-golang-
github-anacrolix-envpprof/licensecheck.txt
[X]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[X]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(...)
[-]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[X]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[X]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[X]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[X]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[X]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[X]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[X]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[X]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[X]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[-]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[X]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[X]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[X]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[X]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[X]: Latest version is packaged.
[X]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[-]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[X]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloa
[Bug 1547500] Review Request: python-jupyterlab - The JupyterLab notebook server extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500 --- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > Just curious: does jupyterlab need jupyter? jupyterlab. (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #5) > Been about a year; any progress here? Not really, sorry about that. If anybody want's to take over, please do. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1547500] Review Request: python-jupyterlab - The JupyterLab notebook server extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500 --- Comment #7 from Miro Hrončok --- (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #6) > (In reply to Jens Petersen from comment #3) > > Just curious: does jupyterlab need jupyter? > > jupyterlab. Ignore that part. I need my morning coffee. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022
--- Comment #2 from Mattias Ellert ---
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - make %{?_smp_mflags} → %make_build
>
> - make install DESTDIR=%{buildroot} → %make_install
I know these macros exist. I find them to be obfuscating and confusing and not
at all helpful or clarifying. So not using them was a conscious decision on my
part. For me they make the specfile harder to read.
> - The libraries should be versioned:
>
> %{_libdir}/libHepMC3.so
>
> %{_libdir}/libHepMC3search.so
I contacted uppstream and they added a soname, I have added a patch with this
change taken from the upstream git in this updated version:
Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC3.spec
SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC3-3.1.0-2.fc29.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1376387] Review Request: golang-github-Unknwon-com - Commonly used functions for the Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376387 --- Comment #5 from Matthias Runge --- Ugh, how could I miss this. However, I don't have any interest in this, and am happy to give this package to someone caring better than I did. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1377227] Review Request: golang-github-go-stack-stack - Implements utilities to capture, manipulate, and format call stacks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1377227 --- Comment #7 from Matthias Runge --- Ugh, how could I miss this. However, I don't have any interest in this, and am happy to give this package to someone caring better than I did, or to just retire the package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1547500] Review Request: python-jupyterlab - The JupyterLab notebook server extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500 José Matos changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@fc.up.pt --- Comment #8 from José Matos --- Installing current jupyterlab with pip I get: $ pip3 list --user Package Version - --- jupyterlab0.35.4 jupyterlab-server 0.2.0 By comparison last year (June) install had: $ pip3 list --user Package Version --- --- jupyterlab 0.32.1 jupyterlab-launcher 0.10.5 orthopy 0.5.3 pipdate 0.3.1 pyprof2calltree 1.4.3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685515] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685515 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1685211 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685211 [Bug 1685211] Update Sphinx to version 2 and drop Python 2 support from Sphinx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685515] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685515 Bug ID: 1685515 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: sphinxcontrib-devhelp is a sphinx extension which outputs Devhelp document. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685519] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685519 Bug ID: 1685519 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: sphinxcontrib-jsmath is a sphinx extension which renders display math in HTML via JavaScript. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685519] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685519 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1685211 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685211 [Bug 1685211] Update Sphinx to version 2 and drop Python 2 support from Sphinx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685524] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685524 Bug ID: 1685524 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp-1.0.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp is a sphinx extension which renders HTML help files. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685524] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685524 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1685211 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685211 [Bug 1685211] Update Sphinx to version 2 and drop Python 2 support from Sphinx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685530] New: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685530 Bug ID: 1685530 Summary: Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: mhron...@redhat.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp.spec SRPM URL: https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp-1.0.2-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: sphinxcontrib-qthelp is a sphinx extension which outputs QtHelp document. Fedora Account System Username: churchyard -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685530] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685530 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1685211 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685211 [Bug 1685211] Update Sphinx to version 2 and drop Python 2 support from Sphinx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670441] Review Request: setconf - Tool for changing values of parameters in text files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jama...@redhat.com Flags||needinfo?(jama...@redhat.co ||m) --- Comment #28 from Miro Hrončok --- > Fedora Account System Username: jama...@redhat.com Jan, what is your Fedora username? Do you have a FAS account? https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1547500] Review Request: python-jupyterlab - The JupyterLab notebook server extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500 --- Comment #9 from Lumír Balhar --- I did the same in a completely empty virtual environment (Python 3.7) and the result is this huge list of packages: $ pip freeze attrs==19.1.0 backcall==0.1.0 bleach==3.1.0 decorator==4.3.2 defusedxml==0.5.0 entrypoints==0.3 ipykernel==5.1.0 ipython==7.3.0 ipython-genutils==0.2.0 jedi==0.13.3 Jinja2==2.10 jsonschema==3.0.1 jupyter-client==5.2.4 jupyter-core==4.4.0 jupyterlab==0.35.4 jupyterlab-server==0.2.0 MarkupSafe==1.1.1 mistune==0.8.4 nbconvert==5.4.1 nbformat==4.4.0 notebook==5.7.4 pandocfilters==1.4.2 parso==0.3.4 pexpect==4.6.0 pickleshare==0.7.5 prometheus-client==0.6.0 prompt-toolkit==2.0.9 ptyprocess==0.6.0 Pygments==2.3.1 pyrsistent==0.14.11 python-dateutil==2.8.0 pyzmq==18.0.1 Send2Trash==1.5.0 six==1.12.0 terminado==0.8.1 testpath==0.4.2 tornado==6.0.1 traitlets==4.3.2 wcwidth==0.1.7 webencodings==0.5.1 And it seems that it also bundles semver.py. I am willing to help because jupyterlab is my favorite tool. Is there anybody who would like to drive this effort and create some todo list? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1547500] Review Request: python-jupyterlab - The JupyterLab notebook server extension
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1547500
--- Comment #10 from Miro Hrončok ---
I've stopped a year ago because the javascript needed internet to build.
Anyway, see this:
In [5]: for pkg, version in pypkgs:
...: print(pkg, version)
...: subprocess.run(('dnf', 'repoquery', '--repo=rawhide',
'--whatprovides', f'python3dist({pkg.lower()})'), stderr=subprocess.DEVNULL)
...: print()
attrs 19.1.0
python3-attrs-0:17.4.0-8.fc30.noarch
backcall 0.1.0
python3-backcall-0:0.1.0-5.fc30.noarch
bleach 3.1.0
python3-bleach-0:3.0.2-2.fc30.noarch
decorator 4.3.2
python3-decorator-0:4.3.0-2.fc30.noarch
defusedxml 0.5.0
python3-defusedxml-0:0.5.0-7.fc30.noarch
entrypoints 0.3
python3-entrypoints-0:0.2.3-11.fc30.noarch
ipykernel 5.1.0
python3-ipykernel-0:5.1.0-1.fc30.noarch
ipython 7.3.0
python3-ipython-0:7.2.0-2.fc30.noarch
ipython-genutils 0.2.0
python3-ipython_genutils-0:0.1.0-16.fc30.noarch
jedi 0.13.3
python3-jedi-0:0.12.1-3.fc30.noarch
Jinja2 2.10
python3-jinja2-0:2.10-7.fc30.noarch
jsonschema 3.0.1
python3-jsonschema-0:3.0.0~b3-2.fc30.noarch
jupyter-client 5.2.4
python3-jupyter-client-0:5.2.3-7.fc30.noarch
jupyter-core 4.4.0
python3-jupyter-core-0:4.4.0-7.fc30.noarch
jupyterlab 0.35.4
jupyterlab-server 0.2.0
MarkupSafe 1.1.1
python3-markupsafe-0:1.0-2.fc30.x86_64
mistune 0.8.4
python3-mistune-0:0.8.3-6.fc30.x86_64
nbconvert 5.4.1
python3-nbconvert-0:5.4.1-1.fc30.noarch
nbformat 4.4.0
python3-nbformat-0:4.4.0-6.fc30.noarch
notebook 5.7.4
python3-notebook-0:5.7.2-2.fc30.noarch
pandocfilters 1.4.2
python3-pandocfilters-0:1.4.1-7.fc30.noarch
parso 0.3.4
python3-parso-0:0.3.1-2.fc30.noarch
pexpect 4.6.0
python3-pexpect-0:4.6-3.fc30.noarch
pickleshare 0.7.5
python3-pickleshare-0:0.7.4-11.fc30.noarch
prometheus-client 0.6.0
python3-prometheus_client-0:0.5.0-1.fc30.noarch
prompt-toolkit 2.0.9
python3-prompt-toolkit-0:2.0.7-2.fc30.noarch
ptyprocess 0.6.0
python3-ptyprocess-0:0.6.0-4.fc30.noarch
Pygments 2.3.1
python3-pygments-0:2.2.0-15.fc30.noarch
pyrsistent 0.14.11
python3-pyrsistent-0:0.14.9-2.fc30.x86_64
python-dateutil 2.8.0
python3-dateutil-1:2.8.0-1.fc30.noarch
pyzmq 18.0.1
python3-zmq-0:17.0.0-4.fc30.x86_64
Send2Trash 1.5.0
python3-send2trash-0:1.4.2-7.fc30.noarch
six 1.12.0
python3-six-0:1.12.0-1.fc30.noarch
terminado 0.8.1
python3-terminado-0:0.8.1-9.fc30.noarch
testpath 0.4.2
python3-testpath-0:0.3.1-7.fc30.noarch
tornado 6.0.1
python3-tornado-0:5.0.2-5.fc30.x86_64
traitlets 4.3.2
python3-traitlets-0:4.3.2-8.fc30.noarch
wcwidth 0.1.7
python3-wcwidth-0:0.1.7-9.fc30.noarch
webencodings 0.5.1
python3-webencodings-0:0.5.1-7.fc30.noarch
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 Didier Fabert (tartare) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685200] Review Request: build2 - Cross-platform build toolchain for developing and packaging C++ code
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685200 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #7 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Seems everything is good, package is approved. You still need to find a sponsor. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- LGTM, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1684948 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948 [Bug 1684948] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag - Declarative flag parsing for Go using struct tags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684929] Review Request: golang-github-huandu-xstrings - A collection of useful string functions in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||1684948 Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948 [Bug 1684948] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag - Declarative flag parsing for Go using struct tags -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684948] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag - Declarative flag parsing for Go using struct tags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1684933, 1684929 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- All are packaged and need review. Missinggo is bootstrapped to avoid the dependency loop. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929 [Bug 1684929] Review Request: golang-github-huandu-xstrings - A collection of useful string functions in Go https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 [Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the review! Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864817-golang-github-bradfitz-iter/golang-github-bradfitz-iter.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864817-golang-github-bradfitz-iter/golang-github-bradfitz-iter-0-0.1.20190303git33e6a98.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - Note: %ldconfig_scriptlets is not needed anymore on F30/Rawhide. If you plan for F29/EPEL, it's ok to keep it. - There are issues with the interface subpackage. It contains include files and require a -devel dependency: HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: E: devel-dependency HepMC3-devel HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Photospp/include/Photos/PhotosHepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Photospp/include/Photos/PhotosHepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/include/Tauola/TauolaHepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/include/Tauola/TauolaHepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/src/TauolaHepMC3Event.cxx HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/src/TauolaHepMC3Particle.cxx HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc-tester/include/HepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc-tester/include/HepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc-tester/src/HepMC3Event.cxx HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc-tester/src/HepMC3Particle.cxx HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/pythia8/include/Pythia8/Pythia8ToHepMC3.h Should this be a interfaces-devel package instead? Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: === - Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Photospp/include/Photos/PhotosHepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Photospp/include/Photos/PhotosHepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/include/Tauola/TauolaHepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/Tauolapp/include/Tauola/TauolaHepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc- tester/include/HepMC3Event.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/mc-tester/include/HepMC3Particle.h HepMC3-interfaces : /usr/share/HepMC3/interfaces/pythia8/include/Pythia8/Pythia8ToHepMC3.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/ConvertExample/cmdline.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/ConvertExample/include/WriterHEPEVTZEUS.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/ConvertExample/include/WriterRootTreeOPAL.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/RootIOExample2/include/LinkDef.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/RootIOExample2/include/MyClass.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/RootIOExample2/include/MyRunClass.h HepMC3-doc : /usr/share/doc/HepMC3/examples/RootIOExample2/include/myclass_Classes.h See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#DevelPackages = MUST items = C/C++: [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: ldconfig not called in %post and %postun for Fedora 28 and later. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "GNU General Public License", "GPL (v2)", "Unknown or generated". 227 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review/HepMC3/review- HepMC3/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [x]: Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Development files must be in a -devel package [x]: Package uses nothing in %doc
[Bug 1645294] Review Request: delve - Debugger for Go programming language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645294 --- Comment #47 from Fedora Update System --- delve-1.2.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-5c4f0a0da7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684437] Review Request: php-mkopinsky-zxcvbn-php - Realistic password strength estimation PHP library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684437 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- php-mkopinsky-zxcvbn-php-4.4.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-c5233c2b67 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672598] Review Request: golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman - So you always leave a note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672598 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-spf13-jwalterweatherman-1.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-dd9b295d8b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1664384] Review Request: python-yaspin - library for terminal spinners
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664384 --- Comment #12 from Patrik Kopkan --- Done: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-yaspin/settings#usersgroups-tab . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/git-secret -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671790] Review Request: python-vistir - python library including utility functions
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671790 Bug 1671790 depends on bug 1664384, which changed state. Bug 1664384 Summary: Review Request: python-yaspin - library for terminal spinners https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664384 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1664384] Review Request: python-yaspin - library for terminal spinners
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1664384 Patrik Kopkan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-yaspin-0.14.0-4.fc30 Resolution|--- |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed||2019-03-05 14:58:10 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684938] Review Request: golang-github-docopt - A command-line arguments parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684938 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- > Move Version above %gometa (and you can drop %commit). I am packaging the latest commit because it fixes some stuff since the latest release. The project is abandoned since 2016, so I don't expect any new release. > golang-github-docopt-docopt-go exists, but it appears to be orphaned and retired. This uses the new name, so the file conflicts below are fine. You may want to add Obsoletes/Provides for this (though hopefully no-one uses the -devel name instead of the macro shortcuts.) Added. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864828-golang-github-docopt/golang-github-docopt.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864828-golang-github-docopt/golang-github-docopt-0.6.2-1.20190303gitee0de3b.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685515] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-devhelp - Sphinx extension for Devhelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685515 Patrik Kopkan changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671064] Review Request: libldac - LDAC library from AOSP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671064 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-05 15:20:50 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- libldac-2.0.2.2-4.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680253] Review Request: R-generics - Common S3 model fitting generics not provided by base R methods
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680253 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-generics-0.0.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680194] Review Request: R-remotes - R Package Installation from Remote Repositories
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680194 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-remotes-2.0.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1675937] Review Request: golang-github-transip-gotransip - TransIP API client for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675937 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-transip-gotransip-5.8.1-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680254] Review Request: R-ellipsis - Tools for Working with ...
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680254 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- R-ellipsis-0.1.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1672272] Review Request: tpm2-pkcs11 - PKCS#11 interface for TPM 2.0 hardware
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1672272 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-05 15:20:53 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- tpm2-pkcs11-0-0.1.20190219git836d715.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1679191] Review Request: yubihsm-connector - Backend to talk to YubiHSM 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- yubihsm-connector-2.0.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b7c88498ef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684929] Review Request: golang-github-huandu-xstrings - A collection of useful string functions in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the reviews. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864838-golang-github-huandu-xstrings/golang-github-huandu-xstrings.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864838-golang-github-huandu-xstrings/golang-github-huandu-xstrings-1.2.0-1.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685519] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685519
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
"Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 17 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath/review-python-
sphinxcontrib-jsmath/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-
packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3
-sphinxcontrib-bibtex, python3-sphinxcontrib-seqdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-adadomain, python3-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3
-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3-sphinxcontrib-actdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram, python3-sphinxcontrib-phpdomain, python3
-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUST
use names beginning with python2- or python3- as appropriate.
[Bug 1685524] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685524
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
"Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 75 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp/review-
python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp/licensecheck.txt
[-]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
Note: No known owner of /usr/share/locale/cak/LC_MESSAGES,
/usr/share/locale/cak
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-
packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3
-sphinxcontrib-bibtex, python3-sphinxcontrib-seqdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-adadomain, python3-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3
-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3-sphinxcontrib-actdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram, python3-sphinxcontrib-phpdomain, python3
-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefi
[Bug 1685530] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685530
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSD (unspecified)", "BSD 2-clause "Simplified" License",
"Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* BSD (unspecified)". 71 files
have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp/review-python-
sphinxcontrib-qthelp/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/lib/python3.7/site-
packages/sphinxcontrib(python3-sphinxcontrib-spelling, python3
-sphinxcontrib-bibtex, python3-sphinxcontrib-seqdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-adadomain, python3-sphinxcontrib-programoutput, python3
-sphinxcontrib-fulltoc, python3-sphinxcontrib-actdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-issuetracker, python3-sphinxcontrib-blockdiag, python3
-sphinxcontrib-autoprogram, python3-sphinxcontrib-phpdomain, python3
-sphinxcontrib-httpdomain)
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
Python:
[x]: Python eggs must not download any dependencies during the build
process.
[x]: A package which is used by another package via an egg interface should
provide egg info.
[x]: Package meets the Packaging Guidelines::Python
[x]: Package contains BR: python2-devel or python3-devel
[x]: Packages MUST NOT have dependencies (either build-time or runtime) on
packages named with the unversioned python- prefix unless no properly
versioned package exists. Dependencies on Python packages instead MUS
[Bug 1685524] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685524 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685519] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685519 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #4 from Mattias Ellert --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #3) > - Note: %ldconfig_scriptlets is not needed anymore on F30/Rawhide. If you > plan for F29/EPEL, it's ok to keep it. This is for EPEL 7 too. > - There are issues with the interface subpackage. It contains include files > and require a -devel dependency: > > HepMC3-interfaces.noarch: E: devel-dependency HepMC3-devel > > [...] > >Should this be a interfaces-devel package instead? This is reasonable. New version: Spec URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC3.spec SRPM URL: http://www.grid.tsl.uu.se/review/HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc29.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- git-secret-0.2.5-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-962eb8fe28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- git-secret-0.2.5-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7845890e44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680435] Review Request: wp-cli - The command line interface for WordPress
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680435 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- wp-cli-2.1.0-1.el6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 6. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c65e24e2b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 --- Comment #7 from Gergely Gombos --- Koji builds successful Rawhide https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33188736 F30 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33189245 F29 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33189247 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 J. Scheurich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||muft...@web.de --- Comment #3 from J. Scheurich --- BTW: $ rpmbuild -ba golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof.spec warning: -u use in %forgemeta is deprecated, use -z instead to select a separate set of rpm variables! ... $ The package compiles anyway -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685530] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685530 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685524] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhelp - Sphinx extension for HTML help files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685524 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-sphinxcontrib-htmlhe ||lp-1.0.1-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-03-05 16:39:35 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Thank You. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685519] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath - Sphinx extension for math in HTML via JavaScript
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685519 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-sphinxcontrib-jsmath ||-1.0.1-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-03-05 16:40:01 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Thank You. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685530] Review Request: python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp - Sphinx extension for QtHelp documents
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685530 Miro Hrončok changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Fixed In Version||python-sphinxcontrib-qthelp ||-1.0.2-1.fc31 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-03-05 16:41:59 --- Comment #3 from Miro Hrončok --- Thank You. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- All good, package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684612] Review Request: f30-backgrounds - Fedora 30 default desktop background
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684612 Adam Williamson changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ON_QA CC||awill...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Adam Williamson --- Seems that package just beat the freeze, so I will mark this as ON_QA: when we finally get another successful compose, it should be in it, and we can verify that the backgrounds are used in all blocking media (Workstation, KDE, XFCE). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670441] Review Request: setconf - Tool for changing values of parameters in text files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441 Jan Macku changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(jama...@redhat.co | |m) | --- Comment #29 from Jan Macku --- My Fedora username is same as in Bugzilla. (jamacku) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649583] Review Request: golang-github-tv42-httpunix - Go library to talk HTTP over Unix domain sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649583 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tv42-httpunix-0-0.1.20190305gitb75d861.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-224a36b621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #6 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/HepMC3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649583] Review Request: golang-github-tv42-httpunix - Go library to talk HTTP over Unix domain sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649583 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tv42-httpunix-0-0.1.20190305gitb75d861.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bb7c7f0a7a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648595] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-term - Manages POSIX terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pkg-term-0-0.1.20190305gitaa71e9d.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62f67043ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-rican7-retry -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648584] Review Request: golang-github-dgryski-bitstream - Read and write bits from io.Reader and io.Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648584 --- Comment #5 from Robert-André Mauchin --- I updated the SRPM with the correct file, please review it? Thanks for your time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648595] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-term - Manages POSIX terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648595 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pkg-term-0-0.1.20190305gitaa71e9d.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f180e45e27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684909] Review Request: golang-github-ttacon-chalk - Intuitive package for prettifying terminal/console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-ttacon-chalk -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684924] Review Request: golang-github-mschoch-smat - State Machine Assisted Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mschoch-smat -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684908] Review Request: golang-github-philhofer-fwd - Buffered Reader/Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-philhofer-fwd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-tinylib-msgp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684927] Review Request: golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist - A skip list implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684927 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684936] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof - Allows run time configuration of Go's pprof features and default HTTP mux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684936 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-anacrolix-envpprof -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670441] Review Request: setconf - Tool for changing values of parameters in text files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670441 --- Comment #30 from Miro Hrončok --- In order to get into packagers groups, you need to sign the contributor agreement. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Legal:Fedora_Project_Contributor_Agreement -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648593] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-tty - Simple tty utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648593 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-mattn-tty -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- OK, looks good. ANdré -> André in the changelog, though. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684929] Review Request: golang-github-huandu-xstrings - A collection of useful string functions in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929 --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- Already approved, but fix the 1.o2.0-1 -> 1.2.0-1 in the changelog. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1644010] Review Request: golang-github-pierrec-lz4 - LZ4 compression and decompression in pure Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1644010 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-pierrec-lz4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Fixed locally. Thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684933] Review Request: golang-github-bradfitz-iter - Range over integers [0,n).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684933 --- Comment #5 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-bradfitz-iter -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684929] Review Request: golang-github-huandu-xstrings - A collection of useful string functions in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684929 --- Comment #4 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-huandu-xstrings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684938] Review Request: golang-github-docopt - A command-line arguments parser
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684938 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- OK, approved. Please add a comment about the versioning then. Also, you can add a comment reminder about dropping the Obsoletes/Provides (in +2 releases or so). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] New: Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 Bug ID: 1685730 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: carl@george.computer QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864921-golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns/golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/carlwgeorge/reviews/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00864921-golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns/golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns-1.0.0-1.fc30.src.rpm Description: Aurora DNS API client written in Go. Fedora Account System Username: carlwgeorge -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648584] Review Request: golang-github-dgryski-bitstream - Read and write bits from io.Reader and io.Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648584 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #6 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- OK, approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685226] Review Request: gnatcoll-core - The GNAT Components Collection – core packages
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685226
--- Comment #3 from Björn Persson ---
(In reply to Pavel Zhukov from comment #2)
> Gnatcoll 2018 is gnatcoll-core-2018. I'd prefer to add Provides:
> gnatcoll-core tag and package another libraries.
That can also be made to work with some extra trouble. The package named
gnatcoll will need to pull in gnatcoll-bindings and gnatcoll-db, and
gnatcoll-devel will need to pull in gnatcoll-bindings-devel and
gnatcoll-db-devel. Otherwise functionality will mysteriously disappear when
users upgrade. But that creates cyclical build-time dependencies because
building gnatcoll-bindings and gnatcoll-db requires gnatcoll-core. The
dependencies that are needed for upgrades will have to be temporarily removed
for mass rebuilds. Adding gnatcoll-core as a new package avoids the cyclical
dependencies. gnatcoll and gnatcoll-devel will then be empty packages that
exist only to pull in gnatcoll-bindings and gnatcoll-db during upgrades.
I also think it will be less confusing to users, as the name gnatcoll-core
communicates clearly that it's not all of Gnatcoll but only the core.
(In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #1)
> - Split the doc into its own noarch subpackage
That's a good idea. Thanks.
> - Please include all licenses you package, and add a comment explaining the
> license breakdown:
I'm afraid I forgot to check the licenses of the files from Sphinx. I'll make
sure to fix that.
> Add %{?_smp_mflags} to make? If it supports it.
Parallel building is done by GPRbuild. The makefile just composes parameters to
GPRbuild and GPRinstall.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643742] Review Request: golang-etcd-bbolt - An embedded key/value database for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643742
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Update to 1.3.2 and you can drop the commit hash and 0 release.
How much memory does %gochecks use? Maybe that can be reported upstream, or
maybe it's fixed already. Also, I think builders have a ridiculous amount of
RAM... I tried uncommenting it and it uses max ~2.6 G; this should be fine,
except maybe 32-bit. Might want to try a scratch build to be sure.
Can remove the %license tag re-definition.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Expat License", "Unknown or generated". 43 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
1643742-golang-etcd-bbolt/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode, /usr/share/gocode/src/github.com
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[x]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 40960 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
N
[Bug 1684906] Review Request: golang-github-glycerine-go-unsnap-stream - Small golang library for decoding the snappy streaming format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
QA Contact|extras...@fedoraproject.org |loganje...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: golang-github-glycerine-go-unsnap-stream.spec should be golang-
github-glycerine-unsnap-stream.spec
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name
- Changelog reports the username as root, with no email
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "Expat
License". 17 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in /home/jamesjer/1684906-golang-github-glycerine-go-
unsnap-stream/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[!]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages sho
[Bug 1670656] Review Request: grafana - an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656 --- Comment #26 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- make_webpack.sh can be a simplified a little bit as you don't really need to use go to build it: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org/make_webpack.sh Also, are you interested in maintaining golang-github-go-stack-stack (bug 1377227) and golang-github-Unknwon-com (bug 1376387), since you need them for grafana? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0bc7b26f0f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-99c85070a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.el7 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 7. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2432033d99 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-94e3dca61c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #11 from Mattias Ellert --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #5) > All good, package approved. Thank you for the review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680397] Review Request: combblas - The Combinatorial BLAS Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680397 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-06 06:58:05 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- combblas-1.6.2-0.1.beta2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680308] Review Request: php-typo3-phar-stream-wrapper - Interceptors for PHP's native phar:// stream handling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680308 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-06 06:58:09 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- php-typo3-phar-stream-wrapper-3.0.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1483262] Review Request: phpdoc - Documentation generator for PHP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1483262 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-03-06 06:58:10 --- Comment #21 from Fedora Update System --- phpdoc-2.9.0-7.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670656] Review Request: grafana - an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656 --- Comment #27 from Mark Goodwin --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #25) > (In reply to Mark Goodwin from comment #24) > > In addition to Xavier's notes and questions in Comment #23, rpmlint issues > > warnings that Provides: bundled(foo) should be versioned. > > > > # rpmlint RPMS/x86_64/grafana-5.4.3-10.fc28.x86_64.rpm > > grafana.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/grafana-cli > > grafana.x86_64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/sbin/grafana-server > > This should be done somehow (automatically, I'd have thought), since debug > information is in the -debuginfo subpackage. It seems like it might be > because you've disabled debug packages; why is that? The build failed as follows : Empty %files file /home/mgoodwin/rpmbuild/BUILD/grafana-5.4.3/debugsourcefiles.list I've investigated some more and managed to get the debuginfo package building again (but omitting the debugsource package since it's empty) - it seems there are some issues with debuginfo for golang binaries. WHat I have now allows gdb backtraces, which is better than we had before. And the unstripped-binary-or-object complaints have gone away now (since we now have the *.debug versions too) > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/grafana/grafana.ini grafana > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/grafana/grafana.ini 640 > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /etc/grafana/ldap.toml grafana > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/grafana/ldap.toml 640 > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-readable /etc/sysconfig/grafana-server 640 > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/grafana/conf/defaults.ini > > grafana > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-readable /usr/share/grafana/conf/defaults.ini 640 > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid > > /usr/share/grafana/conf/distro-defaults.ini grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/grafana/conf/ldap.toml > > grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/grafana/conf/provisioning > > grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid > > /usr/share/grafana/conf/provisioning/dashboards grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid > > /usr/share/grafana/conf/provisioning/dashboards/sample.yaml grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid > > /usr/share/grafana/conf/provisioning/datasources grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid > > /usr/share/grafana/conf/provisioning/datasources/sample.yaml grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /usr/share/grafana/conf/sample.ini > > grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/grafana/data grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/grafana/data grafana > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/grafana/data 750 > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/lib/grafana/data/plugins grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/lib/grafana/data/plugins grafana > > grafana.x86_64: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/grafana/data/plugins 750 > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-uid /var/log/grafana grafana > > grafana.x86_64: W: non-standard-gid /var/log/grafana grafana > > I assume you've followed the instructions on > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/UsersAndGroups/ ? yes I have followed that doc - using the 'dynamic allocation' method, as described in that document. It would seem rpmlint is complaining when it shouldn't. To resolve that, I would have to manually chmod/chgrp in the %post scriptlets. Install/testing the %pre stuff that's there now in the spec on systems with/without grafana user/group all seems to work correctly. > > grafana.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > > /usr/share/grafana/public/app/plugins/datasource/elasticsearch/img/elasticsearch.svg > > grafana.x86_64: E: script-without-shebang > > /usr/share/grafana/public/fonts/grafana-icons.svg > > These should not be executable. Will add to Patch0 (000-grafana-fedora.patch). This is broken upstream but no big deal, svg files are not even scripts obviously. > > grafana.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir > > /usr/share/grafana/public/sass/.sass-lint.yml > > grafana.x86_64: W: hidden-file-or-dir > > /usr/share/grafana/public/test/.jshintrc > > Delete these development files. now deleted via spec %build but might put that in the patch too since it's broken upstream. > > grafana.x86_64: W: log-files-without-logrotate ['/var/log/grafana'] > > See https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_log_files Grafana has it's own log rotation and management, so we do not ship or rely on the logrotate config mechanism documented in the guidelines. > > # rpmlint SRPMS/grafana-5.4.3-10.fc28.src.rpm > > grafana.src:98: W: unversioned-explicit-provides ... > > It seems like you have bundled provides for things you've removed from the > source. You don't need to add those (though yes, technically, it's > statically bundled, the macros should do that sort of thing for you.) I need to au
[Bug 1684346] Review Request: ocaml-dune - A composable build system for OCaml
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684346 Andy Li changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-03-06 07:56:32 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
