[Bug 1686244] Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33256139 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686244] New: Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686244
Bug ID: 1686244
Summary: Review Request: R-maps - Draw Geographical Maps
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-maps.spec
SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-maps-3.3.0-1.fc29.src.rpm
Description:
Display of maps. Projection code and larger maps are in separate packages
('mapproj' and 'mapdata').
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684934] Review Request: golang-github-RoaringBitmap-roaring - Go version of the Roaring bitmap data structure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684934
Jerry James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||loganje...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #1 from Jerry James ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
- Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
Note: golang-github-RoaringBitmap-roaring.spec should be golang-github-
roaringbitmap-roaring.spec
See:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Spec_file_name
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: There is no build directory. Running licensecheck on vanilla
upstream sources. Licenses found: "*No copyright* Apache License
(v2.0)", "BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Apache License
(v2.0) BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License", "Unknown or
generated", "Apache License (v2.0)". 66 files have unknown license.
Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/jamesjer/1684934-golang-
github-RoaringBitmap-roaring/licensecheck.txt
[!]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
Note: Dirs in package are owned also by:
/usr/share/gocode/src/github.com(golang-googlecode-gogoprotobuf-devel,
golang-github-peterbourgon-diskv-devel, golang-github-aead-
chacha20-devel, golang-github-DataDog-datadog-go-devel, golang-github-
git-lfs-netrc-devel, golang-github-rainycape-memcache-devel, golang-
github-shurcool-httpfs-devel, golang-github-ncw-swift-devel, golang-
github-karlseguin-expect-devel, golang-github-pquerna-cachecontrol-
devel, golang-github-nwaples-rardecode-devel, golang-github-
akrennmair-gopcap-devel, golang-github-marstr-randname-devel, golang-
github-dvsekhvalnov-jose2go-devel, golang-github-coreos-go-oidc-devel,
golang-github-prometheus-procfs-devel, golang-github-dustin-go-
humanize-devel, golang-github-pelletier-go-buffruneio-devel, golang-
github-thejerf-suture-devel, golang-github-gdamore-encoding-devel,
golang-github-zyedidia-pty-devel, golang-github-freetype-devel,
golang-github-gregjones-httpcache-devel, golang-github-SAP-go-hdb-
devel, golang-github-chzyer-logex-devel, golang-github-bmizerany-
perks-devel, golang-github-aws-aws-sdk-go-devel, golang-github-
gorilla-websocket-devel, golang-github-yuin-gopher-lua-devel, golang-
github-google-martian-devel, golang-github-garyburd-redigo-devel,
golang-github-pkg-xattr-devel, golang-github-gliderlabs-ssh-devel,
glide-devel, golang-github-pengsrc-shared-devel, golang-github-petar-
GoLLRB-devel, golang-github-lucasb-eyer-colorful-devel, golang-github-
vividcortex-ewma-devel, golang-github-census-instrumentation-
opencensus-proto-devel, golang-github-smartystreets-goconvey-devel,
golang-github-hashicorp-memberlist-devel, golang-github-mattn-go-
runewidth-devel, golang-github-docker-go-devel, golang-github-miekg-
pkcs11-devel, golang-github-fatih-color-devel, golang-github-
mitchellh-reflectwalk-devel, golang-github-go-ldap-ldap-devel, golang-
github-skratchdot-open-golang-devel, golang-github-bradfitz-
gomemcache-devel, golang-github-shurcool-issues-devel, golang-github-
wellington-libsass-devel, golang-github-cheggaaa-pb-devel, golang-
github-mdlayher-wifi-devel, golang-github-nwidger-jsoncolor-devel,
golang-github-shopspring-decimal-devel, golang-github-circonus-labs-
circonusllhist-devel, golang-github-calmh-du-devel, golang-github-ncw-
dropbox-sdk-unofficial-devel, golang-github-coreos-go-iptables-devel,
golang-github-shurcool-reactions-devel, golang-github-cloudflare-
devel, golang-github-facebookgo-atomicfile-devel, golang-github-
gorilla-context-devel, golang-github-data-dog-txdb-devel, golang-
github-jinzhu-gorm-devel, golang-github-git-lfs-devel, golang-github-
coreos-go-log-devel, golang-github-google-cmp-devel, golang-github-
coreos-pkg-devel, golang-github-nicksnyder-i18n-devel, golang-github-
azure-autorest-devel, golang-github-xlab-handysort-devel, golang-
github-kylelemons-godebug-devel, golang-github-emicklei-go-restful-
devel, golang-github-xanzy-ssh-agent-devel,
[Bug 1684862] Review Request: python-dask - Parallel PyData with Task Scheduling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684862 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- python-dask-1.1.3-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-faf89234b9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684862] Review Request: python-dask - Parallel PyData with Task Scheduling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684862 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- python-dask-1.1.3-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-66a6320a12 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684906] Review Request: golang-github-glycerine-go-unsnap-stream - Small golang library for decoding the snappy streaming format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906 Jerry James changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|loganje...@gmail.com QA Contact|loganje...@gmail.com|extras...@fedoraproject.org Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jerry James --- You'll need to change the name of this bug to golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream prior to asking for repo creation. This package is APPROVED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- R-doParallel-1.0.14-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a28a339b26 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- R-doParallel-1.0.14-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b5eb07c936 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- R-doParallel-1.0.14-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f976d0f35a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685996] Review Request: R-dplyr - A Grammar of Data Manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685996 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-dplyr-0.8.0.1-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cb16f3b2c5 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686032] Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686032 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-svglite-1.2.1-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4c6daa9e15 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673125] Review Request: mozilla-iot-gateway - Web of Things gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125 --- Comment #8 from Troy Dawson --- Spec URL: https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway.spec SRPM URL: https://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/gateway/mozilla-iot-gateway-0.7.0-2.fc30.src.rpm Updated to address several of the issues: - Remove all hidden files - Remove all backup files - ensure all bash shell scripts are executable - ensure that all scripts calling /usr/bin/env node are executable - I removed many of the zero length files, mainly the core-js and package-lock -- The ones that are left are either for tests, or I didn't feel comfortable removing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643742] Review Request: golang-etcd-bbolt - An embedded key/value database for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643742 Elliott Sales de Andrade changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- That's not too large for the builders, I don't think. Just the 32-bit ones might not work due to single-process address space limitations. I thought maybe https://github.com/etcd-io/bbolt/pull/26 might help with that, but it seems to be included in this version already. I think you should be able to enable the full tests on the builders (at least x86_64 anyway). But approved, otherwise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930 --- Comment #4 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin from comment #2) > - Escape %dopar% in description > > %description > Provides a parallel backend for the %%dopar% function using the parallel > package. > This might be a bug in rpmlint, but it still complains no matter how many %'s I add. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685978] Review Request: R-ggplot2movies - Movies Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685978 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- R-ggplot2movies-0.0.1-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-fc4dca33a7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686210] New: Review Request: perl-JSON-Validator - Validate data against a JSON schema
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686210 Bug ID: 1686210 Summary: Review Request: perl-JSON-Validator - Validate data against a JSON schema Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: emman...@seyman.fr QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-Validator/perl-JSON-Validator.spec SRPM URL: http://people.parinux.org/~seyman/fedora/perl-JSON-Validator/perl-JSON-Validator-3.06-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: JSON::Validator is a data structure validation library based around JSON Schema. This module can be used directly with a JSON schema or you can use the elegant DSL schema-builder JSON::Validator::joi to define the schema programmatically. Fedora Account System Username: eseyman Rpmlint Errors: perl-JSON-Validator.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US programmatically -> pro grammatically, pro-grammatically, programmatic ally 1 packages and 1 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 1 warnings. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686032] Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686032 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-svglite -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684908] Review Request: golang-github-philhofer-fwd - Buffered Reader/Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-philhofer-fwd-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-263e9f36f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3d81d39294 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648593] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-tty - Simple tty utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648593 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-tty-0-0.1.20190306gite4f8711.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ac96917833 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684927] Review Request: golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist - A skip list implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684927 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist-0-0.1.20190306git2dfbae5.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-270f8c33b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tinylib-msgp-1.1.0-0.1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-23fd18c207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684924] Review Request: golang-github-mschoch-smat - State Machine Assisted Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mschoch-smat-0-0.1.20190306git90eadee.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-12d9915d75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684909] Review Request: golang-github-ttacon-chalk - Intuitive package for prettifying terminal/console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ttacon-chalk-0.1-0.1.20190306git22c06c8.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2299e03c66 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-94e3dca61c -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rican7-retry-0.1.0-1.20190306git272ad12.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4e2f3cc846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648595] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-term - Manages POSIX terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pkg-term-0-0.1.20190305gitaa71e9d.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62f67043ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- git-secret-0.2.5-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7845890e44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649583] Review Request: golang-github-tv42-httpunix - Go library to talk HTTP over Unix domain sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649583 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tv42-httpunix-0-0.1.20190305gitb75d861.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-224a36b621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3d81d39294 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tinylib-msgp-1.1.0-0.1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-23fd18c207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684908] Review Request: golang-github-philhofer-fwd - Buffered Reader/Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-philhofer-fwd-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-263e9f36f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684924] Review Request: golang-github-mschoch-smat - State Machine Assisted Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mschoch-smat-0-0.1.20190306git90eadee.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-12d9915d75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684909] Review Request: golang-github-ttacon-chalk - Intuitive package for prettifying terminal/console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ttacon-chalk-0.1-0.1.20190306git22c06c8.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2299e03c66 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rican7-retry-0.1.0-1.20190306git272ad12.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4e2f3cc846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648595] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-term - Manages POSIX terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pkg-term-0-0.1.20190305gitaa71e9d.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-62f67043ba -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649583] Review Request: golang-github-tv42-httpunix - Go library to talk HTTP over Unix domain sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649583 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tv42-httpunix-0-0.1.20190305gitb75d861.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-224a36b621 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |MODIFIED --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- git-secret-0.2.5-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7845890e44 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685996] Review Request: R-dplyr - A Grammar of Data Manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685996 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-dplyr -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685978] Review Request: R-ggplot2movies - Movies Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685978 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-ggplot2movies -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/R-doParallel -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648593] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-tty - Simple tty utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648593 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-tty-0-0.1.20190306gite4f8711.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a18ed89962 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648593] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-tty - Simple tty utility
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648593 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-tty-0-0.1.20190306gite4f8711.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ac96917833 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684927] Review Request: golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist - A skip list implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684927 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist-0-0.1.20190306git2dfbae5.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7309946bbc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684927] Review Request: golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist - A skip list implementation in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684927 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ryszard-goskiplist-0-0.1.20190306git2dfbae5.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-270f8c33b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tinylib-msgp-1.1.0-0.1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-cef817bce7 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686023] Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023 --- Comment #4 from Robert-André Mauchin --- It seems it is the same package, but not providing the same binaries. Please work with the current maintainer to see all the features you need being implemented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684919] Review Request: golang-github-tinylib-msgp - A Go code generator for MessagePack
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684919 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tinylib-msgp-1.1.0-0.1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-23fd18c207 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686032] Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686032
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- ask upstream for a license file
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "Unknown or
generated". 47 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-svglite/review-R-svglite/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if appli
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3d81d39294 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-11e5eba71e -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686023] Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023 --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík --- I think such name cannot be used, because console-setup tools are already in Fedora [1]. If they are different, different package name has to be used or they have to be merged somehow. Maybe just complement package can be produced instead? 1. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/console-setup -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686023] Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023
Petr Menšík changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pemen...@redhat.com
--- Comment #2 from Petr Menšík ---
Interesting package. Non format review yet.
However it should be adapted to Fedora system more. For example /etc/default is
not usually used on Fedora, instead similar purposes have /etc/sysconfig
directory.
I think %{_sysconfdir}/console-setup should be %config(noreplace) too, or it
should be moved to %{_datadir}. Ideally if system distributed file was in
%_datadir and user could modify its copy in %_sysconfdir.
I think your spec does not conform to FontPolicy [1]. Fonts should be packaged
separate from any other tools or code.
As an example take kbd package and terminus-console-fonts package with only
fonts.
1. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/FontsPolicy/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 Carl George changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-03-06 19:42:36 --- Comment #3 from Carl George --- https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1224717 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686024] Review Request: pforth - Portable ANS-like Forth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686024
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Group: is not used in Fedora
install build/unix/pforth %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
→
install -pm755 build/unix/pforth %{buildroot}%{_bindir}
Package approved. Please fix the above issue before import.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* Public domain". 101
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/pforth/review-pforth/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in pforth-
debuginfo , p
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 --- Comment #2 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686023] Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - There's some OFL and CDDL in there too: ICU License Common Development and Distribution License --- console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ara console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/be console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/br console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ca console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ch console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/cz console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/de console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/dk console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ee console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/es console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/fi console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/fr console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/gb console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/gr console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/it console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/jp console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/kr console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/lt console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/lv console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/nl console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/no console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/pl console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/pt console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ro console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ru console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/se console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/sk console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/solaris console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/tr console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/tuv console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/tw console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/ua console-setup-1.189/Keyboard/ckb/symbols/sun_vndr/us SIL Open Font License (v1.1) console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u12b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u12n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u14b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u14n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u14v.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u16b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u16n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u16v.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u20b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u20n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u22b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u22n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u24b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u24n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u28b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u28n.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u32b.bdf console-setup-1.189/Fonts/bdf/ter-u32n.bdf Add them to the License field. Add a comment explaining the license breakdown. - Fix the typo in your License field: ang → and, GPL-2.0 → GPLv2 License:Public Domain and MIT and GPLv2 - Patch the obsolete FSF address and send it upstream: console-setup.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/bin/ckbcomp bdf2psf.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/bin/bdf2psf - The CHANGES file is a symlink: include the actual file instead console-setup.noarch: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/share/doc/console-setup/CHANGES debian/changelog %doc debian/changelog Package Review == Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed = MUST items = Generic: [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "ICU License Common Development and Distribution License", "FSF All Permissive License", "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License", "SIL Open Font License (v1.1)", "Creative Commons CC0 Public License", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License", "Expat License", "GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF address)", "NTP License", "NTP License (legal disclaimer)". 786 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /home/bob/packaging/review /console-setup/review-console-setup/licensecheck.txt [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. [!]: If the package is under multi
[Bug 1684908] Review Request: golang-github-philhofer-fwd - Buffered Reader/Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-philhofer-fwd-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-79fde1c534 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685996] Review Request: R-dplyr - A Grammar of Data Manipulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685996
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION
- Package requires R-core.
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "BSL (v1.0)", "Unknown or generated". 439 files have unknown
license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-dplyr/review-R-dplyr/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version
[Bug 1684908] Review Request: golang-github-philhofer-fwd - Buffered Reader/Writer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684908 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-philhofer-fwd-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-263e9f36f4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685978] Review Request: R-ggplot2movies - Movies Data
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685978
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- ask upstream for a license file
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :DESCRIPTION
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 6 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-ggplot2movies/review-R-ggplot2movies/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/
[Bug 1677989] Review Request: vcglib Visualization and Computer Graphics Library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677989 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pemen...@redhat.com --- Comment #3 from Petr Menšík --- Whatever test case you have, try to make it working with latest eigen3 headers provided by Fedora. That is requirement, it cannot be accepted without it. I would expect from the library to not prefix includes to its own libraries. Just remove eigenlib/ prefix from includes. Change #include to #include etc. Rely on compiler include paths configured when your library is used. It would be nice if you provided pkg-config file that depends on eigen3 library, but it is not required. Please do not use relative include paths like "../../eigenlib/Eigen/LU". Users of this package should use CPPFLAGS=`pkg-config --cflags eigen3` when including your headers. If they do, includes will work as expected and will reuse eigen3 headers from system. It has to live with its dependencies. If some structures were changed, adapt your code to match latest. Can you provide any example how you want users to use your package? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685930] Review Request: R-doParallel - Foreach Parallel Adaptor for the 'parallel' Package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685930
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Escape %dopar% in description
%description
Provides a parallel backend for the %%dopar% function using the parallel
package.
Package approved.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
- Package have the default element marked as %%doc :doc, DESCRIPTION, NEWS
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "GNU General Public License (v2)", "Unknown or generated". 18
files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
/home/bob/packaging/review/R-doParallel/review-R-doParallel/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[!]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
Note: Macros in: R-doParallel (description)
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
R:
[x]: Package contains the mandatory BuildRequires.
[x]: The package has the standard %install section.
[x]: Package requires R-core.
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package bui
[Bug 1684924] Review Request: golang-github-mschoch-smat - State Machine Assisted Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mschoch-smat-0-0.1.20190306git90eadee.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-778a31c4a9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684924] Review Request: golang-github-mschoch-smat - State Machine Assisted Testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mschoch-smat-0-0.1.20190306git90eadee.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-12d9915d75 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685730] Review Request: golang-github-nrdcg-auroradns - Aurora DNS API client written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685730 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |POST CC||zebo...@gmail.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|zebo...@gmail.com Flags||fedora-review+ --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- - License ok - Latest version packaged - Builds in mock - No rpmlint errors - Conforms to Packaging Guidelines Package approved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686022] Review Request: WireGuard - Tools for estabilishing a WireGuard secure IP tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686022 Robert-André Mauchin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zebo...@gmail.com --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- It's already available in RPMFusion along with the kmod (I'm the maintainer): https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/wireguard.git/tree/wireguard.spec https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/wireguard-kmod.git/tree/wireguard-kmod.spec Any reason to repackage it here? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684909] Review Request: golang-github-ttacon-chalk - Intuitive package for prettifying terminal/console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ttacon-chalk-0.1-0.1.20190306git22c06c8.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9aeb951045 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684909] Review Request: golang-github-ttacon-chalk - Intuitive package for prettifying terminal/console output
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684909 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-ttacon-chalk-0.1-0.1.20190306git22c06c8.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2299e03c66 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680435] Review Request: wp-cli - The command line interface for WordPress
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680435 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- wp-cli-2.1.0-1.el6 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 6 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c65e24e2b6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2432033d99 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685270] Review request: git-secret - A bash-tool to store your private data inside a git repository
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685270 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- git-secret-0.2.5-2.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-962eb8fe28 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649583] Review Request: golang-github-tv42-httpunix - Go library to talk HTTP over Unix domain sockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649583 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tv42-httpunix-0-0.1.20190305gitb75d861.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-bb7c7f0a7a -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-99c85070a4 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648595] Review Request: golang-github-pkg-term - Manages POSIX terminals
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648595 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-pkg-term-0-0.1.20190305gitaa71e9d.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-f180e45e27 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1679191] Review Request: yubihsm-connector - Backend to talk to YubiHSM 2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1679191 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- yubihsm-connector-2.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-b7c88498ef -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684284] Review Request: FAudio - FNA is a reimplementation of the Microsoft XNA Game Studio 4.0 Refresh libraries
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684284 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FAudio-19.03-1.fc29, wine-4.3-1.fc29, wine-mono-4.8.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-191d2c919b -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rican7-retry-0.1.0-1.20190306git272ad12.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3a203be391 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671234] Review Request: mpris-scrobbler - User daemon to submit currently playing song to LastFM, LibreFM, ListenBrainz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671234 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- mpris-scrobbler-0.3.1-2.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1580121] systemd-netlogd - Forwards messages from the journal to other hosts over the network using the Syslog Protocol (RFC 5424).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1580121 Petr Menšík changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pemen...@redhat.com --- Comment #11 from Petr Menšík --- You did not provide SRPM, it simplifies testing. Okay, I cannot find any reasonable documentation how to produce it. Let's say it is here: mkdir systemd-netlogd cd systemd-netlogd git init curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/systemd/systemd-netlogd/master/systemd-netlogd.spec spectool -g *.spec fedpkg --release master srpm Now your spec references v1.2, which was never released. spectool cannot find it and you did not provide it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643906] Review Request: golang-github-rican7-retry - A simple, stateless, functional mechanism to perform actions repetitively
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643906 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rican7-retry-0.1.0-1.20190306git272ad12.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4e2f3cc846 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1673125] Review Request: mozilla-iot-gateway - Web of Things gateway
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1673125 --- Comment #7 from Jared Smith --- fedora-review is choking on this package (I left it running for 24+ hours), so I'm reviewing manually. My biggest concern at this point is that running "rpmlint" gives me a huge number of errors on the package, as shown below. For the provides, I think we need to provide which version of the library is bundled. There are a few other errors that will just require a bit of tweaking to file permissions or executables, etc. Let me know if you have questions or concerns about any particular error coming from rpmlint. mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: devel-dependency python3-devel mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(acme-v2) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(acorn) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(ajv) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(ansi-regex) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(ansi-styles) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(anymatch) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(archiver) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(archiver-utils) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(arr-diff) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(arr-flatten) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(array-unique) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(asn1.js) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(assertion-error) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(async) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(atob) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(aws4) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-code-frame) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-plugin-transform-es2015-modules-commonjs) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-runtime) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-template) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-traverse) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babel-types) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(babylon) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(boom) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(braces) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(buffer-from) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(callsites) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(chai) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(chalk) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(color-convert) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(color-name) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(combined-stream) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(commander) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(cookiejar) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(core-js) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(cross-spawn) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(cssom) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(debug) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(decamelize) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(define-property) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(diff) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(domelementtype) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(domhandler) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(domutils) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(enhanced-resolve) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(es-abstract) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(es6-promise) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(eslint-scope) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(esprima) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(execa) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(expand-brackets) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(extend) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(extend-shallow) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(external-editor) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(extglob) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(extsprintf) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(fast-deep-equal) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(fill-range) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(find-up) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(follow-redirects) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(form-data) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(get-stream) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E: useless-provides bundled(glob) mozilla-iot-gateway.noarch: E:
[Bug 1685975] cmocka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685975 --- Comment #1 from Petr Menšík --- fedora-review cannot parse correctly SRPM URL. Trying to workaround. SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/InfrastructureServices/cmocka/fedora/contrib/fedora/cmocka-1.1.3-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680308] Review Request: php-typo3-phar-stream-wrapper - Interceptors for PHP's native phar:// stream handling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680308 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- php-typo3-phar-stream-wrapper-3.0.1-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680375] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen - Send logs to screen, with colors and some other features
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680375 --- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System --- devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc28, perl-GitLab-API-v4-0.17-1.fc28, perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart-0.08-1.fc28, perl-IO-Prompter-0.004015-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen-0.140-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP-0.003003-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680373] Review Request: perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart - HTTP::Tiny::Multipart Perl module
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680373 --- Comment #18 from Fedora Update System --- devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc28, perl-GitLab-API-v4-0.17-1.fc28, perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart-0.08-1.fc28, perl-IO-Prompter-0.004015-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen-0.140-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP-0.003003-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680376] Review Request: perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP - Logging adapter suitable for use in TAP testcases
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680376 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc28, perl-GitLab-API-v4-0.17-1.fc28, perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart-0.08-1.fc28, perl-IO-Prompter-0.004015-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen-0.140-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP-0.003003-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680374] Review Request: perl-IO-Prompter - Prompt for input, read it, clean it, return it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680374 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc28, perl-GitLab-API-v4-0.17-1.fc28, perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart-0.08-1.fc28, perl-IO-Prompter-0.004015-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen-0.140-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP-0.003003-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1680372] Review Request: perl-GitLab-API-v4 - Complete GitLab API v4 client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1680372 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc28, perl-GitLab-API-v4-0.17-1.fc28, perl-HTTP-Tiny-Multipart-0.08-1.fc28, perl-IO-Prompter-0.004015-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-Screen-0.140-1.fc28, perl-Log-Any-Adapter-TAP-0.003003-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684177] Review Request: perl-Alien-FFI - Make available libffi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684177 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- I'm unable got obtain access to any s390x system to debug it. I will probably make this package architecture-specific and disable s390x. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685022] Review Request: HepMC3 - C++ Event Record for Monte Carlo Generators
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685022 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- HepMC3-3.1.0-3.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-0bc7b26f0f -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686032] Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686032 --- Comment #1 from Elliott Sales de Andrade --- This package built on koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=33235873 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686032] New: Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686032 Bug ID: 1686032 Summary: Review Request: R-svglite - An 'SVG' Graphics Device Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: quantum.anal...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-svglite.spec SRPM URL: https://qulogic.fedorapeople.org//R-svglite-1.2.1-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: A graphics device for R that produces 'Scalable Vector Graphics'. 'svglite' is a fork of the older 'RSvgDevice' package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1685975] cmocka
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1685975 Jaroslav Škarvada changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||jskar...@redhat.com Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|jskar...@redhat.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1648584] Review Request: golang-github-dgryski-bitstream - Read and write bits from io.Reader and io.Writer streams
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1648584 --- Comment #7 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/golang-github-dgryski-bitstream -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686024] New: Review Request: pforth - Portable ANS-like Forth
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686024 Bug ID: 1686024 Summary: Review Request: pforth - Portable ANS-like Forth Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/pforth.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/pforth-28-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: pForth is a portable implementation of the Forth language. It provides ANS standard support for Core, Core Extensions, File-Access, Floating-Point, Locals, Programming-Tools, Strings word sets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686023] New: Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686023 Bug ID: 1686023 Summary: Review Request: console-setup - Debian console setup Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/console-setup.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/console-setup-1.189-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: This package contains the scripts, keyboard layouts and fonts used in Debian operating system to configure the text console equivalently to X11. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1686022] New: Review Request: WireGuard - Tools for estabilishing a WireGuard secure IP tunnel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1686022 Bug ID: 1686022 Summary: Review Request: WireGuard - Tools for estabilishing a WireGuard secure IP tunnel Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: lkund...@v3.sk QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora SPEC: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SPECS/WireGuard.spec SRPM: http://v3.sk/~lkundrak/SRPMS/WireGuard-0.0.20190227-1.fc29.src.rpm Description: WireGuard is a VPN that aims to be faster, simpler, leaner, and more useful than IPsec and considerably more performant than OpenVPN. WireGuard is designed as a general purpose VPN for running on embedded interfaces and super computers alike, fit for many different circumstances. It runs over UDP. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643742] Review Request: golang-etcd-bbolt - An embedded key/value database for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643742 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the review. Testing: go.etcd.io/bbolt Testing: "/builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.2/_build/src/go.etcd.io/bbolt" + GOPATH=/builddir/build/BUILD/bbolt-1.3.2/_build:/usr/share/gocode + go test -buildmode pie -compiler gc -ldflags '-extldflags '\''-Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--as-needed -Wl,-z,now -specs=/usr/lib/rpm/redhat/redhat-hardened-ld '\''' seed: -67168 quick settings: count=5, items=1000, ksize=1024, vsize=1024 0001 runtime: out of memory: cannot allocate 2147483648-byte block (683245568 in use) fatal error: out of memory Seems it tries to allocate an enormous amount of memory at the start of testing. Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-etcd-bbolt.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/golang-etcd-bbolt-1.3.2-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1684906] Review Request: golang-github-glycerine-go-unsnap-stream - Small golang library for decoding the snappy streaming format
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684906 --- Comment #2 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Thanks for the review. Spec URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00865143-golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream/golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream.spec SRPM URL: https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/eclipseo/rclone1.45/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/00865143-golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream/golang-github-glycerine-unsnap-stream-0-0.1.20190303gitf967730.fc30.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
