[Bug 1684948] Review Request: golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag - Declarative flag parsing for Go using struct tags
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1684948 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-anacrolix-tagflag-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691608] Review Request: golang-github-mail-v2 - simple and efficient package to send emails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691608 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mail-v2-2.3.1-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691117] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag - parsing of the defacto struct tag style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691117 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag-0-0.1.20190327git217e25f.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691614] Review Request: golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3 - quoted-printable encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691614 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3-3.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691615] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-inject - provides a reflect based injector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691615 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-inject-0-0.1.20190326gitf23751c.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1690837] Review Request: golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr - MySQL server error constants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690837 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr-0-0.1.20190326git6c6b55f.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1650263] Review Request: golang-github-krolaw-dhcp4 - DHCP4 library written in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650263 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-krolaw-dhcp4-0-0.1.20190325git7cead47.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1687008] Review Request: golang-github-koofr-httpclient - Go HTTP client
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1687008 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-koofr-httpclient-0-0.1.20190325git0378617.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688980] Review Request: golang-uber-atomic - Wrapper types for sync/atomic which enforce atomic access
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688980 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-uber-atomic-1.3.2-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688394] Review Request: golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid - Fast generation of 192-bit UUIDs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688394 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-rogpeppe-fastuuid-1.0.0-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #40 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4249741e9d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1646795] Review Request: linux-system-roles - Set of interfaces for unified system management
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646795 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #19 from Fedora Update System --- linux-system-roles-1.0-9.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-197c1515f6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698242] Review Request: gamehub - All your games in one place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- gamehub-0.13.1.77-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9aedd06612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697631] Review Request: golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt - Store and retrieve encrypted configs from etcd or consul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697631 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt-0.0.2-1.20190412gitb2862e3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-254449d2bf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #39 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9453c711eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698403] Review Request: drawing - Drawing application for the GNOME desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- drawing-0.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2478ff3440 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645286] Review Request: golang-github-gomodule-redigo - Go client for Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-gomodule-redigo-2.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-72528e02f6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692376] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-gtk - Go binding for GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-gtk-0-0.1.20190412gite9a6766.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8f81d5ad82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695362] Review Request: python-metaextract - get metadata for python modules
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695362 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- python-metaextract-1.0.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-3dfdeb72d3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643960] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-zstd - Zstd wrapper for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-datadog-zstd-1.3.5-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-889e466328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1649059] Review Request: golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent - OpenCensus Go exporters for OpenCensus Agent
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649059 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #29 from Fedora Update System --- golang-contrib-opencensus-exporter-ocagent-0.4.12-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-a99edd9357 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689493] Review Request: python-zarr - An implementation of chunked, compressed, N-dimensional arrays for Python
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689493 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- python-zarr-2.3.1-2.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698610] Review Request: python3-pytoml - A parser for TOML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698610 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- python3-pytoml-0.1.20-1.el7 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-b2a5307c53 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699505] New: Review Request: rust-sd - An intuitive find & replace CLI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699505 Bug ID: 1699505 Summary: Review Request: rust-sd - An intuitive find & replace CLI Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-sd.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-sd-0.5.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: An intuitive find & replace CLI. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308 --- Comment #3 from Robert-André Mauchin --- (In reply to Elliott Sales de Andrade from comment #2) > Same comment about Changelog: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs > It's the new format prescribed by rpm 4.14: Add support for date-style full timestamps in %changelog (trac:903) https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.14.0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698489] Review Request: gnome-books - E-Book Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698489 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:05:24 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- fedora-obsolete-packages-30-34, gnome-books-3.32.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688881] Review Request: golang-github-armon-consul-api - Golang API client for Consul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=161 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:33 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-armon-consul-api-0-0.1.20190408giteb2c6b5.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643996] Review Request: golang-github-eapache-xerial-snappy - Xerial-compatible Snappy framing support for golang
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643996 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:32 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-eapache-xerial-snappy-0-0.1.20190408git776d571.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692376] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-gtk - Go binding for GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692376 Bug 1692376 depends on bug 1692344, which changed state. Bug 1692344 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-mattn-pointer - Utility for cgo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692344 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1693014] Review Request: python-pyrpm - Python module for parsing RPM spec filesPython module for parsing RPM spec files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693014 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:50 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System --- python-pyrpm-0.8-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688944] Review Request: golang-github-tmc-grpc-websocket-proxy - A proxy to transparently upgrade grpc-gateway streaming endpoints to use websockets
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688944 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:31 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-tmc-grpc-websocket-proxy-0-0.1.20190408git0ad062e.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692344] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-pointer - Utility for cgo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692344 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:34 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-pointer-0-0.1.20190408git49522c3.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689006] Review Request: golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-middleware - Golang gRPC Middlewares: interceptor chaining, auth, logging, retries and more
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689006 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:30 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-grpc-ecosystem-middleware-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1688984] Review Request: golang-uber-zap - Blazing fast, structured, leveled logging in Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688984 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:28 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- golang-uber-zap-1.9.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696924] Review Request: python-prettyprinter - Syntax-highlighting, declarative and composable pretty printer
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696924 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- python-prettyprinter-0.17.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1465889] Tracking: Deepin Desktop related package review tracker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1465889 Bug 1465889 depends on bug 1696048, which changed state. Bug 1696048 Summary: Review Request: udisks2-qt5 - Qt5 binding for udisks2 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696048 What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696048] Review Request: udisks2-qt5 - Qt5 binding for udisks2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696048 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:15 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- udisks2-qt5-0.0.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696692] Review Request: ocaml-ocp-indent - A simple tool to indent OCaml programs
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696692 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:04:17 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- ocaml-ocp-indent-1.7.0-2.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1695371] Review Request: golang-github-masterminds-semver-1 - Work with semantic versions in go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1695371 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:03:24 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-masterminds-semver-1-1.4.2-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691608] Review Request: golang-github-mail-v2 - simple and efficient package to send emails
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691608 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mail-v2-2.3.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1690837] Review Request: golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr - MySQL server error constants
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1690837 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-vividcortex-mysqlerr-0-0.1.20190326git6c6b55f.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691615] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-inject - provides a reflect based injector
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691615 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-inject-0-0.1.20190326gitf23751c.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691578] Review Request: golang-github-bufio-v1 - implements buffered I/O
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691578 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-bufio-v1-1.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1689865] Review Request: python-pysol-cards - python 2/3 API for dealing layouts of PySol FC/old PySol/Freecell Pro
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1689865 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed||2019-04-13 00:02:47 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- python-pysol-cards-0.4.1-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691614] Review Request: golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3 - quoted-printable encoding
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691614 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-alexcesaro-quotedprintable-v3-3.0.0-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1691117] Review Request: golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag - parsing of the defacto struct tag style
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1691117 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|RAWHIDE |ERRATA --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-facebookarchive-structtag-0-0.1.20190327git217e25f.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699476] Review Request: golang-github-gofrs-uuid - Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers as defined in RFC-4122
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699476
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |POST
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Same comment about Changelog:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs
As this is minor, I'll approve.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Expat License", "Expat License", "Unknown or
generated". 43 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in 1699476-golang-github-gofrs-uuid/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
[Bug 1699498] Review Request: rust-atomicwrites - Atomic file-writes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699498 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34134944 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC||quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #2 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
Same comment about Changelog:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs
Is the Requires:aom really necessary? The binary already depends on
libaom.so.0.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
Issues:
===
= MUST items =
C/C++:
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated". 11 files have unknown license. Detailed
output of licensecheck in 1699308-go-avif/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 20480 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[!]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[-]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in golang-
github-kagami-avif-devel , go-avif-debuginfo , go-avif-debugsource
[?]: Package fu
[Bug 1699498] New: Review Request: rust-atomicwrites - Atomic file-writes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699498 Bug ID: 1699498 Summary: Review Request: rust-atomicwrites - Atomic file-writes Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-atomicwrites.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-atomicwrites-0.2.2-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Atomic file-writes. The basic idea is to write to temporary files, and move them when done writing. This avoids the problem of two programs writing to the same file. For AllowOverwrite, rename is used. For DisallowOverwrite, link + unlink is used instead to raise errors when the target path already exists. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1696361] Review Request: golang-github-certifi-gocertifi - Carefully curated collection of root certificates
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1696361
Elliott Sales de Andrade changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|nob...@fedoraproject.org|quantum.anal...@gmail.com
Flags||fedora-review?
--- Comment #8 from Elliott Sales de Andrade ---
I don't see times in the prescribed Changelog format:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#changelogs
Also, a heads up that upstream is thinking of switching from calver to semver:
https://github.com/certifi/gocertifi/pull/10#issuecomment-481493704
so you may want to start versioning at 0.2018.01.08 (or similar) to allow for
easier upgrades once they do that.
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed
= MUST items =
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "*No copyright* Mozilla Public License (v2.0)", "Unknown or
generated". 4 files have unknown license. Detailed output of
licensecheck in 1696361-golang-github-certifi-gocertifi/licensecheck.txt
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/gocode/src,
/usr/share/gocode
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[!]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[?]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 1 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
= SHOULD items =
Generic:
[x]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[?]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
translations for supported Non-English
[Bug 1699493] Review Request: rust-unescape - Unescapes strings with escape sequences written out as literal characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699493 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34133650 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699493] New: Review Request: rust-unescape - Unescapes strings with escape sequences written out as literal characters
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699493 Bug ID: 1699493 Summary: Review Request: rust-unescape - Unescapes strings with escape sequences written out as literal characters Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unescape.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/rust-unescape-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Unescapes strings with escape sequences written out as literal characters. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699487] New: Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699487 Bug ID: 1699487 Summary: Review Request: kim-api - Open Knowledgebase of Interatomic Models KIM API Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Hardware: All OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: Package Review Severity: medium Priority: medium Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: jungh...@votca.org QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/kim-api.spec SRPM URL: https://junghans.fedorapeople.org/kim-api-2.0.2-1.fc31.src.rpm TaskID: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34099878 Description: OpenKIM is an online framework for making molecular simulations reliable, reproducible, and portable. Models conforming to the KIM application programming interface work seamlessly with major simulation codes that have adopted the KIM-API standard. Side note: kim-api could be used in the next release of the lammps package. Fedora Account System Username: junghans -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698710] Review Request: rust-mockito - HTTP mocking for Rust
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698710
Robert-André Mauchin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zebo...@gmail.com
--- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin ---
- Remove the dot at the end of the summary:
rust-mockito-devel.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C HTTP mocking for Rust.
- Add the LICENSE file to the mockito subpackage
%files -n %{crate}
%license LICENSE
%{_bindir}/mockito-server
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699476] Review Request: golang-github-gofrs-uuid - Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers as defined in RFC-4122
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699476 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34132079 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699476] New: Review Request: golang-github-gofrs-uuid - Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers as defined in RFC-4122
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699476 Bug ID: 1699476 Summary: Review Request: golang-github-gofrs-uuid - Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers as defined in RFC-4122 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gofrs-uuid.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/golang-github-gofrs-uuid-3.2.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Package uuid provides a pure Go implementation of Universally Unique Identifiers (UUID) variant as defined in RFC-4122. This package supports both the creation and parsing of UUIDs in different formats. This package supports the following UUID versions: - Version 1, based on timestamp and MAC address (RFC-4122) - Version 2, based on timestamp, MAC address and POSIX UID/GID (DCE 1.1) - Version 3, based on MD5 hashing of a named value (RFC-4122) - Version 4, based on random numbers (RFC-4122) - Version 5, based on SHA-1 hashing of a named value (RFC-4122) Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #38 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4249741e9d -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #37 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-1bac0790b1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #36 from Fedora Update System --- playerctl-2.0.2-2.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9453c711eb -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #35 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/playerctl -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 --- Comment #34 from Tony Crisci --- Thanks for helping me get my software out there. It's a privilege to be in the repo. If you have problems with upstream down the line, send me an email or open an issue on github. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1671571] Review Request: playerctl - MPRIS command-line controller and library for spotify, vlc, audacious, bmp, cmus, and others
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1671571 Dridi Boukelmoune changed: What|Removed |Added Flags|needinfo?(dridi.boukelmoune |fedora-review+ |@gmail.com) | --- Comment #33 from Dridi Boukelmoune --- Approved. Don't forget to add me as a co-maintainer, I will stay around to help if you get any bug reports or if I see an update lingering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698242] Review Request: gamehub - All your games in one place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698242 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- gamehub-0.13.1.77-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-9aedd06612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698242] Review Request: gamehub - All your games in one place
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698242 --- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla --- (fedscm-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gamehub -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1693852] Review Request: rubygem-test_construct - Creates temporary files and directories for testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1693852 Pavel Valena changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED Fixed In Version||rubygem-test_construct-2.0. ||1-1.fc31 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697631] Review Request: golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt - Store and retrieve encrypted configs from etcd or consul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697631 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt-0.0.2-1.20190412gitb2862e3.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ec119f9539 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670656] Review Request: grafana - an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656 --- Comment #41 from Xavier Bachelot --- I too am very glad Mark and Nathan did all the work for packaging grafana and I too agree this is/was a huge task that deserves a lot of thanks. At this point, only minor points are remaining and are likely not blockers. If you saw my comments as moving the goals, this is definitely a misunderstanding and not my intent. A package review is an iterative work, for both the packager and the reviewer(s). You start with the big items and you refine until only the minor ones are remaining. We are at this stage now. I would have loved to be able to point everything out in one go, but that is simply not something that is possible for a package like grafana :-) About the patches, the unclear name and content are not helping anyone, nor the reviewer, nor the packager, nor upstream. Splitting and renaming the patches is not a lot of work and that needs to be done to upstream the patches, which is mandated both by the packaging guidelines and Fedora's philosophy. The real blocker for approving the package now is finding time to do the formal review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698403] Review Request: drawing - Drawing application for the GNOME desktop
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698403 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- drawing-0.2-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2478ff3440 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697631] Review Request: golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt - Store and retrieve encrypted configs from etcd or consul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697631 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-xordataexchange-crypt-0.0.2-1.20190412gitb2862e3.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-254449d2bf -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670656] Review Request: grafana - an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656 --- Comment #40 from Lukas Berk --- Hi Xavier, (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #39) > > > More nitpicking, you're used to it now ;-) > > > - Patch0 can probably be split in several pieces and part of them > > > upstream'ed (manpages and file perms changes at least seem relevant) > > > > OK, I've split into 3 patches (see comments in the spec) > > > 000-grafana-fedora.patch could be split again (Oauth / file perms). > The mostly noop 3rd part could be removed. > > 001-grafana-fedora.patch could also be split (distro defaults / manpages / > Specs + webpack). > > 002-grafana-fedora.patch looks ok. > > Also, the patches can probably use more descriptive names (eg. > grafana-6.1.3-fix_file_perms.patch, grafana-6.1.3-fix_oauth.patch, etc...) > Most of the patches (all but 002 ?) need to be submitted upstream and the > PR/issue URLs referenced in the specfile. > Upstream will likely want fine-grained commits, so the above patch split > will be needed anyway. I have to ask, as somebody looking forward to having grafana available as a properly packaged rpm in fedora, and considering the herculean effort Mark has put in here already, are these kind of patch tweaks/splits and bikeshedding on patch names really now the only blockers for getting grafana into fedora? Or are they things Mark can work on doing over time? I understand and emphatically agree with the notion of getting patches back upstream, but are we going to block Grafana's inclusion until they're accepted upstream? or can Mark take care of adjusting those patches when Grafana does a release and he updates the fedora packaged version to match? In other words, how much of a blocker is taking the one patch and splitting it into 5 (6?) really bringing to the state of the package, such that it's worth blocking the release over it? It'd be nice if we could set a concrete goal at what remains to be done for the fedora-review+ flag to be given, and not a constantly moving set of goalposts. Thanks for spending the time reviewing the work. Looking forward to being able to run grafana through the proper channels! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697711] Review Request: python-portend - TCP port monitoring utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697711 --- Comment #2 from Dan Radez --- I missed the pypi_source macro requested earlier, uploaded a new spec and srpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697711] Review Request: python-portend - TCP port monitoring utilities
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697711 Bug 1697711 depends on bug 1697687, which changed state. Bug 1697687 Summary: Review Request: python-tempora - Objects and routines pertaining to date and time (tempora). https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697687 What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1697687] Review Request: python-tempora - Objects and routines pertaining to date and time (tempora).
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1697687 Dan Radez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|CLOSED Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Last Closed||2019-04-12 12:33:57 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692376] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-gtk - Go binding for GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692376 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-gtk-0-0.1.20190412gite9a6766.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-4468f27fd9 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1692376] Review Request: golang-github-mattn-gtk - Go binding for GTK
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1692376 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-mattn-gtk-0-0.1.20190412gite9a6766.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-8f81d5ad82 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1698871] Review Request: supercollider - Object oriented programming environment for real-time audio and video processing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1698871 --- Comment #2 from Tristan Cacqueray --- I've updated the spec with the one from Planet CCRMA. It does bundle nova-tt[0] and nova-simd[1] header libraries to enable plugins building. Not sure it's worth making separate devel package for those... The new SRPM URL is: https://fedorapeople.org/~tdecacqu/supercollider-3.10.2-2.fc29.src.rpm [0]: https://github.com/supercollider/nova-tt [1]: https://github.com/supercollider/nova-simd -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308 --- Comment #1 from Robert-André Mauchin --- Koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=34125497 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1699308] New: Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1699308 Bug ID: 1699308 Summary: Review Request: go-avif - AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: Package Review Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org Reporter: zebo...@gmail.com QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org CC: package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org Target Milestone: --- Classification: Fedora Spec URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go-avif.spec SRPM URL: https://eclipseo.fedorapeople.org/for-review/go-avif-0.1.0-1.fc31.src.rpm Description: Go-avif implements AVIF (AV1 Still Image File Format) encoder for Go using libaom, the high quality AV1 codec. Fedora Account System Username: eclipseo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643960] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-zstd - Zstd wrapper for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643960 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-datadog-zstd-1.3.5-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-7230c9dd05 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1643960] Review Request: golang-github-datadog-zstd - Zstd wrapper for Go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1643960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-datadog-zstd-1.3.5-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-889e466328 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1333529] Review Request: opa-fm - OPA Fabric Manager
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1333529 Honggang LI changed: What|Removed |Added Flags||needinfo?(scott.j.breyer@in ||tel.com) --- Comment #18 from Honggang LI --- I failed to build the src create by the spec and tarball in previous two comments. My laptop is running fedora29. I added these BuildRequires to your spec file. BuildRequires: gcc BuildRequires: gcc-c++ BuildRequires: python-unversioned-command fc29@localhost:~/intel-src$ mock -mock --rebuild --resultdir=fc31 -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ./opa-fm-10.9.1.1-1.fc29.src.rpm + set +x Build Errors: Patch failed for filename: sm make: *** [Makefile.linux:256: prepfiles] Error 1 make[2]: *** [Makefile:178: STAGE] Error 1 make[3]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Maketargets.toplevel:89: STAGE] Error 2 make[4]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Maketargets.stage:49: STAGE] Error 1 make[4]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Rules.Common:224: buildcmdsonly] Error 2 make[5]: *** No rule to make target 'libpm.a', needed by 'build.VIEO_HOST.release/sm'. Stop. make[6]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Rules.Common:220: buildlibsonly] Error 2 make[6]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Rules.Common:224: buildcmdsonly] Error 2 make[7]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Maketargets.toplevel:145: LIBS] Error 2 make[7]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Maketargets.toplevel:96: CMDS] Error 2 make[8]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Rules.Common:224: buildcmdsonly] Error 2 make[8]: *** [/builddir/build/BUILD/opa-fm-10.9.1.1/Makerules/Rules.Common:416: build.VIEO_HOST.release/pm_sweep.c.dep] Error 1 make[9]: *** No rule to make target 'libpm.a', needed by 'opamkdsapdb'. Stop. FAILED Build, errors detected: VIEO_HOST X86_64 release error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.9ngYiu (%build) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645286] Review Request: golang-github-gomodule-redigo - Go client for Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645286 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-gomodule-redigo-2.0.0-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-ff78b19d23 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1645286] Review Request: golang-github-gomodule-redigo - Go client for Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1645286 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|POST|MODIFIED --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- golang-github-gomodule-redigo-2.0.0-1.fc30 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 30. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-72528e02f6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
[Bug 1670656] Review Request: grafana - an open source, feature rich metrics dashboard and graph editor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1670656 --- Comment #39 from Xavier Bachelot --- (In reply to Mark Goodwin from comment #38) > (In reply to Xavier Bachelot from comment #37) > > The diff between the very first spec in this review and what it is now is > > really impressive, well done. > > thanks once again Xavier You and Nathan deserve the thanks, you did the work, I only commented ;-) > > > > > More nitpicking, you're used to it now ;-) > > - Patch0 can probably be split in several pieces and part of them > > upstream'ed (manpages and file perms changes at least seem relevant) > > OK, I've split into 3 patches (see comments in the spec) > 000-grafana-fedora.patch could be split again (Oauth / file perms). The mostly noop 3rd part could be removed. 001-grafana-fedora.patch could also be split (distro defaults / manpages / Specs + webpack). 002-grafana-fedora.patch looks ok. Also, the patches can probably use more descriptive names (eg. grafana-6.1.3-fix_file_perms.patch, grafana-6.1.3-fix_oauth.patch, etc...) Most of the patches (all but 002 ?) need to be submitted upstream and the PR/issue URLs referenced in the specfile. Upstream will likely want fine-grained commits, so the above patch split will be needed anyway. ...snip... > > - There used to be Provides: bundled(..) for all the golang stuff in the > > bundle everything case (fedora <= 28 or EL <= 7). > > I think it should be put back in case you want to build for EL7 (I guess > > F28 doesn't really matter anymore). > > Those Provides would only ever be for EPEL7. I can put it back if you really > want, though for EPEL we'd only ever rebase to new upstream releases - and > grafana upstream updates the vendor'd golang sources whenever needed. So it > seems to me the spec pollution wasn't warranted and I removed it. > You are making the assumption that both upstream developers and downstream fedora packagers will be properly doing their duty forever. Although this is probably unlikely, this might not be a safe assumption. I understand adding 100+ lines to the spec is not very appealing, but I tend to think we'd rather be on the safe side. I would welcome more opinions on this, maybe I'm too pedantic. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component ___ package-review mailing list -- package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
